Karl Popper's Vision of Democracy As the Ideal Society
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
•AST AFE!r *NA COLLECTi®» HIS THESIS HAS BEEN ACCEPTED POS TI1E DEGREE OP^.tXV ^ '•£V\C\ l\ // Karl Popper’s Vision of Democracy as the Ideal Society By, Oyigo, Josphat. */ Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the M.A degree Philosophy of the University of Nairobi. UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI LIBRARY 1 0160066 0 4 0 / *OR USE TN TOP r,TR9 »T?r ONLY Declaration. This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University Signature:. Oyigo, Josphat. [Candidate] This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval as University Supervisor. ___ V Signature:.. .1 Dr. F. O ch ien ^ Odhiambo. Date:. % .'.23. 11 Dedication. To, My family, with love. But, This work belongs to all who recognise with concern the central role of philosophy in society. */ 4 0 / til Content. Acknowledgement.......................................................................................................... iv A bstract.........................................................................................................................v Definition of Terms .......................................................................................................vii Chapter One. Introduction.................. 1 1.1 Statement of the Problem......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives........................................................................... .......................................3 1.3 Methodology ............................................................................................................3 1.4 Theoretical Framework .......................................................................................... 3 1.5 Justification and Significance of the Study..............................................................5 1.6 Literature Review ....................................................................................................6 Notes...................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter Two, Popper’s Theory of Knowledge..................................................................................... 17 2.1 The ‘Three World’ concept........................................................................................18 2.2 Common Sense Realism.............................................................................................22 2.3 Growth of Knowledge................................................................................................ 24 2.4 Corroboration and Verisimilitude..............................................................................29 2.5 Critical Remarks..........................................................................................................31 Notes........................................................................................................................ 40 Chapter Three. Epistemological Origins of Popper’s Social-Political Philosophy ............................ 44 3.1 Who Should Rule?.....................................................................................................45 3.2 Science, Scientific Attitude, and Society................................................................ 49 3.3 The Three World Influences on Society ...............................................................52 3.4 Critical Remarks .................................................................................................../< 57 Notes...................................................................................................................... 62 Chapter Four. The Open Society - Popper’s Ideal Society ................................................................64 4.1 Popper’s Democracy ................................................................................................65 4.2 Institutions o f the Open Society ............................................................................. 66 4.3 Piecemeal Vs Utopian Social Engineering................................................................70 4.4 Popper’s Political Maxims .......................................................................................74 4.5 Polyarchy .................................................................................................................. 76 4.6 Political Paradoxes .................................................................................................... 79 4.7 The Enemies of the Open Society ....................................................... ................... 83 4.8 Critical Remarks .........................................................................................................90 Notes........................................................................................................................100 Chapter Five Summary and Recommendations.................................................................................. 104 Bibliography.....................................................................................................................107 IV Acknowledgement. This study would not have been completed without the assistance, co-operation, and encouragement of several people. I am immensely indebted to my supervisor Dr. F. Ochieng’- odhiambo, for his candid, insightful, and dedicated guidance. His clarity in criticism not only facilitated my conceptualisation of Popper’s ideas, it also helped in concretising and strengthening my own ideas as well. I owe much of my success to Mr Karori Mbugua, whose interest in this work was inspiring. His assistance crystallised what had initially seemed a hazy dream. I also want to express my gratitude to all the members of Philosophy department, especially my lecturers - Dr. F. Ochieng'-Odhiambo, Prof. Gail Presby, Prof. J. M. Nyasani, Dr. E. H. Embeywa, Dr. Jack Odhiambo and Fr. M. Mwangi, for their understanding and incessant motivation which made it possible for me to grapple with the arduous M.A course. To my family, I extend my unreserved gratitude and appreciation. They have been my source of strength as they have always prodded me to further my studies. ''/ Last but not least, I express my special thanks to Ms Mbaisi who has been my greatest source of inspiration. I sincerely wish I could find words apt enough to thank her for her readiness to help me in typing this work. I am, however, responsible for any errors of fact, interpretation, or judgement in this work. Abstract. This work attempts to reveal and explicate Popper’s Ideal Society. This is done against the backdrop of an unended quest, by social philosophers, for an Ideal Society. The study shows that unlike most past philosophers who envisaged the Ideal Society to be a utopian changeless and perfect entity, Popper conceives it as an imperfect, changing [growing] and Open Society. This Popperian Society is what the study has called Polyarchy - a term borrowed from Robert Dahl’s A Preface to Democratic Theory and which symbolizes the epitome of the democratic process. The work recognizes Popper’s contention that the classical conception of the Ideal Society was authoritarian and mistaken. It accepts his argument to the effect that this classical conception was prompted by a faulty epistemic theory. This theory takes the validity of knowledge to be a function of its source and therefore dependant on authority. It thus tends to justify might as being right. When moved to social and political philosophy, it leads to the question ‘who should rule?’ and therefore to the search for charismatic, intelligent, powerful and benevolent leaders. The study notices Popper’s caution that if this line is taken then it degenerates into authoritarian rule and the propagation of the ‘closed’ Society. In contrast to this, the study shows that Popper’s ‘open’ Society is based on an objective theory of knowledge. Here knowledge takes on a public outlook as emphasis is laid not on the person or source but on debate and criticism. In this perspective, Knowledge is never certain, it is perpetually hypothetical and conjectural. Since it is public, what is crucial are the social institutions that protect the method of its acquisition. These institutions also govern the conduct of the persons who proclaim this new knowledge. The study then goes ahead to show that this conception of the problem of knowledge leads, in social and political philosophy, to the question: How can we best control our leaders? This results into the demand that a society be administered through social VI institutions which protect the freedom of its members. These institutions should be controlled by the public as they themselves know what is best for them. Although the mood that permeates through the whole work is of shared assumptions, the study challenges many of Poppers’ convictions. It takes great exception to his reduction of epistemology to just methodology, his rejection of psychologism and personalism and especially his demand for near pure institutionalism. It disagrees with his belief in the rationality and objectivity of man especially when it comes to politics. It also rejects his assumption of the autonomy of the Open Society. In this process, it develops Popper’s ideas further by arguing that falsification alone is not enough in the search for knowledge. It also shows that institutionalism when it disregards the personal factor cannot be a foundation of an Ideal Society. But in the end the study adopts most