John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England' H-Albion Sommerville on Barbour, 'John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England' Review published on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 Reid Barbour. John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003. x + 417 pp. $73.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8020-8776-8. Reviewed by Johann P. Sommerville (Department of History, University of Wisconsin, Madison) Published on H-Albion (February, 2005) Selden, Secularism, and Judaism John Selden was one of the most learned and prolific scholars in seventeenth-century England. He wrote on topics including the history of common law, Jewish antiquities, Christian church history, titles of honor, the freedom of the seas, and the gods of the ancient Syrians. He possessed a staggering knowledge of ancient, medieval, and modern sources and languages. He was also an important political figure. In the parliament of 1628-29 he was one of the architects of the Petition of Right. In 1629, he, Sir John Eliot, and others plotted the events which led to the Speaker of the House of Commons being held by force in his chair while three resolutions denouncing recent royal policies were read out. When Charles dissolved the parliament, Selden was imprisoned. Later, he made his peace with the king's regime, was released from prison, and befriended Archbishop William Laud, who found him a seat in the Long Parliament. There, Selden spoke in defense of the bishops, but when Civil War came he sided with parliament. He was appointed a member of the Westminster Assembly, in which he made common cause with other Erastians such as Thomas Coleman, and with Independents, against efforts to establish a rigid, intolerant, and clericalist Presbyterian Church in England. Selden's many other achievements include cataloguing the Arundel Marbles, and writing the official response to Hugo Grotius's Mare Liberum, in which the Dutchman had claimed that the seas are free to all who sail in them, and that the Dutch were therefore perfectly entitled to fish herring off the British coast. Given the vast extent of Selden's learning, and the great range of his intellectual and political activities, it is not surprising that modern scholars have rather shied away from him. A few--Paul Christianson and Richard Tuck, for example--have contributed notably to the study of select aspects of Selden's scholarship, but no one has attempted an overview of all of it. The great merit of Reid Barbour's book is precisely that it attempts to give an account of virtually all of Selden's scholarly output. It will be indispensable reading for everyone who has an interest in Selden but who lacks the time or opportunity to read his writings, for it contains much information on works which are scarcely mentioned elsewhere. Barbour bases his account on Selden's own works and on modern writings--especially (but not exclusively) those which deal specifically with Selden. He does not employ manuscript materials, and makes only limited use of printed sources on proceedings in parliament. He also refrains from discussing the views of a number of prominent twentieth-century historians on matters highly relevant to Selden and his concerns. This makes it difficult to locate his contentions about Selden Citation: H-Net Reviews. Sommerville on Barbour, 'John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England'. H-Albion. 03-26-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/16749/reviews/17879/sommerville-barbour-john-selden-measures-holy-commonwealth-seventeenth Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Albion against the background of recent debate on the seventeenth century more generally. Missing from Barbour's bibliography are the writings of Patrick Collinson, Geoffrey Elton, S. R. Gardiner, Jack Hexter, Christopher Hill, Derek Hirst, Mark Kishlansky, Peter Lake, Theodore K. Rabb, Conrad Russell, Nicholas Tyacke, and many others. Moreover, Barbour says relatively little about the ideas of important predecessors and contemporaries of Selden. He dwells at particular length on Selden's views on religion and church-state relations, but his bibliography omits the works of Lancelot Andrewes (a friend of Selden's as well as an important thinker), Bellarmine, Beza, Calvin, Thomas Coleman (with whom Selden allied in the Westminster Assembly, and whom he praised in hisDe Synedriis), Richard Field, George Gillespie (a leading Presbyterian in the Westminster Assembly), and Gillespie's ally Samuel Rutherford, to name only a few. Barbour stresses the influence of Grotius's thinking on Selden, but his bibliography mentions only Grotius's De Jure Belli ac Pacis, and not his far more voluminous works on religion and church state relations (including the De Imperio Summarum Potestatum circa Sacra, which Selden approvingly referred to in De Synedriis). Barbour has much to say about Selden's Erastianism, and the links between his theories and those of the sixteenth-century thinker Thomas Erastus. Oddly, however, he does not draw on the writings of Erastus himself, which are also missing from the bibliography. Given the limitations of the sources which Barbour has used, it is perhaps inevitable that there are problems large and small with his arguments. He adds little to older writings on Selden's biography, and does not provide much information on Selden's role in English politics from the 1620s to the 1650s. We are told that in the 1620s "Selden appears for the most part to have sided with the 'godly' or zealous Protestants in his work for Parliament" (p. 164), and we learn that "there was no question that Selden was an invaluable standard of true religion for MPs condemnatory of creeping popery and Arminianism in the court and church of Charles I" (p. 165), but he brings little evidence to support these contentions. If Selden was an enemy of Arminianism, then it is perhaps odd that Nicholas Tyacke's authoritative work on the rise of English Arminianism classifies Selden as an Arminian, and that in the 1630s Selden befriended Laud, the leading supporter of the Arminians.[1] Barbour observes that Selden was commissioned by the Commons in 1629 to investigate whether the Arminian Richard Montagu was a lawful bishop. But this does not serve to show that Selden opposed Montagu's Arminianism, or, indeed, that Selden disagreed with Montagu at all. In fact, it is quite likely that Selden did bear a grudge against Montagu, though not about Arminianism. For in 1621 Montagu published an attack on Selden in which he called him (among other things) the "most pernicious underminer of the Church, and of Religion in the Church, that the Prince of darknes hath set on worke to do mischiefe many yeeres."[2] Montagu believed that Selden's ideas undermined the wealth and power of the clergy, and clerics of various theological stripes agreed. Barbour rightly notes that Selden was accused of opposing the clergy and religion, but argues that this was only partially justified, for (he claims) Selden in fact wanted to see a truly religious "holy commonwealth" instituted in England, though he thought that such a commonwealth was too important to be left under the authority of the clergy. Selden "came to be associated with the destruction of the very holy commonwealth that he had laboured so monumentally and inventively to save," Barbour informs us, and he asserts that he in fact dedicated his energies "to the rescue of the holy commonwealth in the face of growing secularism" (p. 19). According to Barbour, in his later years Selden turned to ancient Jewish religion to provide a model for the holy commonwealth he wanted to see set up in England. In the 1640s, he says, "Selden Citation: H-Net Reviews. Sommerville on Barbour, 'John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England'. H-Albion. 03-26-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/16749/reviews/17879/sommerville-barbour-john-selden-measures-holy-commonwealth-seventeenth Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Albion invented his own party of reformed Judaism" (p. 31) and in the Westminster Assembly he "sought to effect the marriage of Judaism and Christianity" "and, withal, to reinvent the norms of spirituality within the English church itself" (p. 273). At the center of his depiction of the perfect religious society, argues Barbour, was the Jewish Sanhedrin, but ultimately he was "elusive on the question that perhaps mattered most in the 1650s: Was the Sanhedrin a useful, viable model for advancing religious society into a prosperity worthy of the Messiah, or a beautiful, poetical dream from which Philo Semites would sadly awaken" (p. 340)? Barbour is himself somewhat elusive on what precisely Selden thought his holy commonwealth should be like. He hints that he wanted some or all of ancient Judaism to be revived, but does not tell us exactly which practices he hoped would be resurrected. Did he advocate circumcision, we might ask, or stoning for blasphemy? The answer to these questions seems to be resoundingly negative. Selden's works on Judaism were largely intended as historical accounts of the customs of the ancient Jews. There is little reason to view them as defenses of those practices. He was aware that early Christians had sometimes built on Judaic traditions, and he knew that some of the clergy of his own day grounded their claims to wealth and power in Jewish precedent--for example portraying the Sanhedrin as a clerical institution. He countered these arguments by producing evidence that church and state were not separate in ancient Judaism, that the Sanhedrin was a secular body like the English parliament, and that it governed in both civil and ecclesiastical matters.
Recommended publications
  • JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission
    U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page i The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER Copyright material: Irish Manuscripts Commission Commission Manuscripts Irish material: Copyright U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iii The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER 1600–1656 V O L U M E I I I 1640–1656 Commission Letters no. 475–680 editedManuscripts by Elizabethanne Boran Irish with Latin and Greek translations by David Money material: Copyright IRISH MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION 2015 U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iv For Gertie, Orla and Rosemary — one each. Published by Irish Manuscripts Commission 45 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland www.irishmanuscripts.ie Commission Copyright © Irish Manuscripts Commission 2015 Elizabethanne Boran has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000, Section 107. Manuscripts ISBN 978-1-874280-89-7 (3 volume set) Irish No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. The index was completed with the support of the Arts andmaterial: Social Sciences Benefaction Fund, Trinity College, Dublin. Copyright Typeset by December Publications in Adobe Garamond and Times New Roman Printed by Brunswick Press Index prepared by Steve Flanders U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page v S E R I E S C O N T E N T S V O L U M E I Abbreviations xxv Acknowledgements xxix Introduction xxxi Correspondence of James Ussher: Letters no.
    [Show full text]
  • Satirical Legal Studies: from the Legists to the Lizard
    Michigan Law Review Volume 103 Issue 3 2004 Satirical Legal Studies: From the Legists to the Lizard Peter Goodrich Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Profession Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons Recommended Citation Peter Goodrich, Satirical Legal Studies: From the Legists to the Lizard, 103 MICH. L. REV. 397 (2004). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol103/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SATIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES: FROM THE LEGISTS TO THE LIZARD Peter Goodrich* ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................... .............................................. ........ .... ..... ..... 399 I. FRAGMENTA ANTIQUITATIS (THE ENDURING TRADITION) .. 415 A. The Civilian Tradition .......................................................... 416 B. The Sermon on the Laws ......................... ............................. 419 C. Satirical Themes ....................... ............................................. 422 1. Personification .... ............................................................. 422 2. Novelty .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Von Greyerz Translated by Thomas Dunlap
    Religion and Culture in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1800 This page intentionally left blank Religion and Culture in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1800 kaspar von greyerz translated by thomas dunlap 1 2008 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright # 2008 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Greyerz, Kaspar von. [Religion und Kultur. English] Religion and culture in early modern Europe, 1500–1800 / Kaspar von Greyerz ; Translated by Thomas Dunlap. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 978-0-19-532765-6 (cloth); 978-0-19-532766-3 (pbk.) 1. Religion and culture—Europe—History. 2. Europe—Religious life and customs. I. Title. BL65.C8G7413 2007 274'.06—dc22 2007001259 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To Maya Widmer This page intentionally left blank Preface When I wrote the foreword to the original German edition of this book in March 2000, I took the secularized social and cultural cli- mate in which Europeans live today as a reason for reminding the reader of the special effort he or she had to make in order to grasp the central role of religion in the cultures and societies of early modern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Erastus Oor Die Struktuur Van Die Gemeenskap'^
    Thomas Erastus oor die struktuur van die gemeenskap’^ A D Pont Abstract Thomas Erastus on the Church, the rulers and the community In this, largely desCriptive paper, the views of Thomas Erastus (1520-1583) of Heidelberg, are discussed. Erastus' views on the church, the rulers and the community are put forward in his Treatise Explicatio gravissimae of 1568-69, published in 1589. It is clear that Erastus depends on the Zurich covenant-theology in his view that the community is essentially a Christian community ruled by the pius magistratus. In this community the church does not appear as a separate coetus or societas, but is ruled by the godly prinCe who rules according to God's law. Erastus' view gained popularity in the ecclesia AngUcam and was, to a certain extent, also a plea for the divine rights of kings. INLEIDENDE OPMERKINGS Dit is duidelik dat die sestiende eeu 'n tyd was waarin baie dinge wat uit die verlede gestam het, in duie gestort het en dat op baie vlakke nuwe insigte na vore gekom het. Dit was nie net op die kerklik-gods- dienstige vlak waar, danksy die arbeid én insigte van Martin Luther, geweldige veranderings plaasgevind het nie, maar ook op die staatkun- dig-politieke én kulturele vlak, is baie veranderings te konstateer. Die bewegings van die RenaissanCe en die Humanisme, verwant aan me- kaar en tog verskillend van inhoud, die opkoms van die nasionale state, die verbrokkeling van die godsdienstig-kerklik-bepaalde eenheid- struktuur en kultuur van die Middeleeue, dui alles op die veranderings wat besig was om plaas te vind.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Ills, the King's Will and the Troubling of Bishop Bridgeman
    LANCASHIRE ILLS, THE KING'S WILL AND THE TROUBLING OF BISHOP BRIDGEMAN B.W. Quintrell, M.A., Ph.D. N one of the more curious episodes of Charles I's personal I rule, bishop John Bridgeman of Chester was early in 1633 startled to find himself subjected to a vigorous local enquiry into aspects of his diocesan administration. It was undertaken without warning by royal commissioners from Westminster; and it was to be followed by months of humiliating prosecu­ tion in and out of High Commission. This rough handling of one of the more experienced of the English bishops came at a time when the High Church Charles and his prospective archbishop of Canterbury, William Laud, were intent on restoring the political standing of the Church while reforming what they regarded as the worst of its doctrinal abuses. Only three years later, Laud's efforts reached their culmination with the appointment of his ally William Juxon, bishop of London, as lord treasurer the first in holy orders since 1470.' Bridgeman, a bishop more firmly associated with the Calvinist James than with his son, was never to experience comparable elevation; but on the other hand there are no compelling grounds for supposing that he was more lax in his ways than the majority of his fellow bishops, even though he alone was proceeded against in this manner. The explanation for his treatment may be found in his peculiar vulnerability to investigation by a king less immediately interested in diocesan reform than in urgently acquiring revenues for pious purposes of his own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Views and Parliamentary Career of John Selden J.T
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Richmond University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 3-3-1995 The political views and Parliamentary career of John Selden J.T. Price Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Price, J.T., "The political views and Parliamentary career of John Selden" (1995). Honors Theses. Paper 710. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Richmond The Political Views and Parliamentary Career of John Selden J. T. Price Senior Honors Thesis Department of History Dr. John R. Rilling March 3, 1995 John Selden rose from a relatively obscure background to become an internationally renowned legal scholar and a key parliamentary leader during the contentious Parliament of 1628-1629. Selden's father was a "ministrell," yet the younger Selden became one of the most respected thinkers in London while still fairly young, and would eventually take a leading role in Parliament. 1 Selden's brilliant mind, personality, and actions as an "honest broker" in his turbulent times made him a man who all sides could respect and who could stay afloat and prosper in the shifting political sands of Seventeenth Century England. John Selden was the son of a minstrel who married Margaret Baker~ the daughter of a Kentish squire.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Knights for Freedom
    FIVE KNIGHTS FOR FREEDOM (A talk delivered at the conference of the Property Bar Association on 12th November 2007) The genesis of this talk is two speeches by Lord Hoffmann in the House of Lords in the cases involving the Belmarsh detainees1. Following 9/11 the UK Government concluded that there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation which justified it in derogating from the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article 5 of the Convention on Human Rights. By section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism etc Act 2001 the Government provided for the detention of non-nationals if the Home Secretary believed that their presence in the UK was a threat to national security but there was some reason why they could not be deported. Nine people were detained in Belmarsh Prison. They appealed to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (“SIAC”). SIAC quashed the derogation order and declared that section 23 was incompatible with the Convention in that it discriminated against the prisoners on grounds of nationality. The Court of Appeal allowed the Secretary of State’s appeal. The House of Lords (Lord Hoffmann dissenting on this point) held that there was a public emergency but agreed with SIAC on the discrimination point. In a speech that went rather further than those of the other Law Lords, Lord Hoffmann said: “This is one of the most important cases which the House had had to decide in recent years. It calls into question the very existence of an ancient liberty of which this country has until now been very proud: freedom from arbitrary arrest and 1 A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 WLR 87; A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No.2) [2005] 3 WLR 1249.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law Judicial Office, Sovereignty, and the Church Of
    1 Common Law Judicial Office, Sovereignty, and the Church of England in Restoration England, 1660-1688 David Kearns Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 2 This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. David Kearns 29/06/2019 3 Authorship Attribution Statement This thesis contains material published in David Kearns, ‘Sovereignty and Common Law Judicial Office in Taylor’s Case (1675)’, Law and History Review, 37:2 (2019), 397-429, and material to be published in David Kearns and Ryan Walter, ‘Office, Political Theory, and the Political Theorist’, The Historical Journal (forthcoming). The research for these articles was undertaken as part of the research for this thesis. I am the sole author of the first article and sole author of section I of the co-authored article, and it is the research underpinning section I that appears in the thesis. David Kearns 29/06/2019 As supervisor for the candidature upon which this thesis is based, I can confirm that the authorship attribution statements above are correct. Andrew Fitzmaurice 29/06/2019 4 Acknowledgements Many debts have been incurred in the writing of this thesis, and these acknowledgements must necessarily be a poor repayment for the assistance that has made it possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Bess of Hardwick) Gave the Queen an Embroidered Gown Made by William Jones, the Queen’S Tailor (Cost Over £100)
    1592 1592 At WHITEHALL PALACE Jan 1,Sat New Year gifts. Gift roll not extant, but Elizabeth Countess of Shrewsbury (Bess of Hardwick) gave the Queen an embroidered gown made by William Jones, the Queen’s tailor (cost over £100). Her other gifts included: Ramsey, the Court Jester, 20s; six of the Queen’s trumpeters, 5s each.SH Jan 1: Queen to Lord Burghley, Lord Howard of Effingham, and Lord Hunsdon: Commission to execute the office of Earl Marshal.RT This post, in overall charge of the College of Arms, was vacant since Earl of Shrewsbury died, 1590. Also Jan 1: play, by Lord Strange’s Men.T Jan 2,Sun French Ambassadors at Whitehall for audience.HD Beauvoir, resident Ambassador, with Duplessis-Mornay, who took his leave. Lord Burghley kept a diary in 1592, shown here as HD. [HT.xiii.464-6]. Also Jan 2: play, by Earl of Sussex’s Men.T Jan 6,Thur play, by Earl of Hertford’s Men.T Jan 6: Allegations against Sir John Perrot, former Lord Deputy of Ireland, noted by the law officers, included: Perrot boasted that he was King Henry’s son; he said the Irish had a prophecy that a bird would do them good, and applied it to himself, he having a parrot in his crest; he uttered ‘immodest and venomous words’ about the Queen; of the Council in Ireland he said he cared no more for them than for so many dogs. [SP12/241/7]. Robert Naunton: ‘Sir Thomas Perrot his father was a Gentleman to the Privy Chamber to Henry the Eighth and in the court married to a lady of great honour and of the King’s familiarity...If we go a little further and compare his picture, his qualities, his gesture and voice with that of the King’s..
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwellian Anger Was the Passage in 1650 of Repressive Friends'
    Cromwelliana The Journal of 2003 'l'ho Crom\\'.Oll Alloooluthm CROMWELLIANA 2003 l'rcoklcnt: Dl' llAlUW CO\l(IA1© l"hD, t'Rl-llmS 1 Editor Jane A. Mills Vice l'l'csidcnts: Right HM Mlchncl l1'oe>t1 l'C Profcssot·JONN MOlUUU.., Dl,llll, F.13A, FlU-IistS Consultant Peter Gaunt Professor lVAN ROOTS, MA, l~S.A, FlU~listS Professor AUSTIN WOOLll'YCH. MA, Dlitt, FBA CONTENTS Professor BLAIR WORDEN, FBA PAT BARNES AGM Lecture 2003. TREWIN COPPLESTON, FRGS By Dr Barry Coward 2 Right Hon FRANK DOBSON, MF Chairman: Dr PETER GAUNT, PhD, FRHistS 350 Years On: Cromwell and the Long Parliament. Honorary Secretary: MICHAEL BYRD By Professor Blair Worden 16 5 Town Farm Close, Pinchbeck, near Spalding, Lincolnshire, PEl 1 3SG Learning the Ropes in 'His Own Fields': Cromwell's Early Sieges in the East Honorary Treasurer: DAVID SMITH Midlands. 3 Bowgrave Copse, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 2NL By Dr Peter Gaunt 27 THE CROMWELL ASSOCIATION was founded in 1935 by the late Rt Hon Writings and Sources VI. Durham University: 'A Pious and laudable work'. By Jane A Mills · Isaac Foot and others to commemorate Oliver Cromwell, the great Puritan 40 statesman, and to encourage the study of the history of his times, his achievements and influence. It is neither political nor sectarian, its aims being The Revolutionary Navy, 1648-1654. essentially historical. The Association seeks to advance its aims in a variety of By Professor Bernard Capp 47 ways, which have included: 'Ancient and Familiar Neighbours': England and Holland on the eve of the a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Magistrate and the ‹Cura Religionis › Heinrich Bullinger’S Prophetical Office and the English Reformation
    The Civil Magistrate and the ‹cura religionis › Heinrich Bullinger’s prophetical office and the English Reformation by Torrance Kirby 1 Introduction John Jewel, Bishop of Sarum, once referred to Heinrich Bullinger as the «oracle of the churches.»1 While Jewel’s remark conveys a pithy assess- ment of the Zuricher’s pre-eminent role on the stage of international Reform, it is particularly applicable to the case of England. Throughout his lengthy career as Antistes of the Church of Zurich (1531–1575), Bullinger exercised a unique infl uence on the Church of England both as theologian and, on a practical level, as counsellor to both princes and bishops. Given the scope of this infl uence and its remarkable con- sistency over a considerable period of time (almost forty years), it is now almost commonplace to include Bullinger among the fi rst rank of reformers of the English Church, although this was not always the case.2 Indeed it is even arguable that no other divine exercised a compa- rable degree of continuous infl uence over all of the principal stages of the English Reformation – from the Henrician and Edwardine reforms, through the crucible of the Marian exile, to the eventual implementa- tion and consolidation of the Elizabethan religious settlement. At every stage Bullinger was engaged as a signifi cant player, and in later years was frequently appealed to as an arbiter of internal disputes and even as 1 John Jewel styled Bullinger «oraculum ecclesiarum.» See Zurich Letters, 1, 70, (Cam- bridge: Parker Society, 1842), p. 156. Théodore de Bèze spoke of Bullinger as «the common shepherd of all Christian churches,» in Icones, id est veræ imagines virorum doctrina simul et pietate illustrium, additis eorundem vitæ e operæ descriptionibus, quibus adiectæ sunt nonnullæ picturæ, quas emblemata vocant (Geneva, 1580).
    [Show full text]
  • Reynolds at Port Eliot Reynolds at Port Eliot
    REYNOLDS AT PORT ELIOT REYNOLDS AT PORT ELIOT Introduction In early 2007, Plymouth City Museum and Art Gallery Richard Eliot, the father of the first Lord Eliot (Edward acquired 23 portraits from the Trustees of the Port Eliot Craggs-Eliot) was one of Reynolds’ principal patrons. Estate through the Acceptance in Lieu scheme. The works Over the years, Reynolds received many commissions to have remained in situ at Port Eliot. paint the Eliot family and their relations and remained on close terms with them throughout his life. The core of the acquisition is a group of 14 works by Sir Joshua Reynolds, one of Plymouth's most famous artists, with a further nine painted by some of his contemporaries. Spanning the period from the start of his career in the 1740s up to the 1780s, the works represent an unusually good group of family portraits from this time. > This leaflet is available in large print. Please ask for a copy. See more works by Reynolds in the Cottonian Collection and discover more galleries and exhibitions, at Plymouth City Museum and Art Gallery. Open 10am to 5.30pm Tuesday to Friday and 10am to 5pm on Saturdays and Bank Holiday Mondays. Admission free. Call 01752 304774 or visit www.plymouthmuseum.gov.uk for more details. HALL > 3 2 There are three portraits in the Hall belonging to Plymouth City Museum and Art Gallery. Hall 1 Portrait: John, 1st Earl of St Germans (1761-1823) Artist: John Hoppner 1 The second surviving son of Edward, 1st Lord Eliot and his wife Catherine, John, 1st Earl of St Germans, enjoyed a distinguished political career during his 62 years.
    [Show full text]