DOCSLIB.ORG

Stunning Sentences 1. Common Forms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stunning Sentences 1. Common Forms STUNNING SENTENCES 1. COMMON FORMS Direct “Those Magical Mushrooms,” The Economist 345, no. 8048 (20 December 1997): 93. Bob Morris, “Let Them Eat Elsewhere,” New York Times Magazine, 19 October 1997, p. 91. Floyd Norris, “Korean Crisis: Blame the Lenders,” New York Times, 14 December 1997, sec. 3, p. 1. “Poetic Injustice,” The Economist 345, no. 8048 (20 December 1997): 129. Embellished “Alabama Isn’t So Different,” The Economist 345, no. 8039 (18 October 1997): 27. Tina Rosenberg, “To Hell and Back,” New York Times Magazine, 28 December 1997, p. 32. “Ambiguity’s Path to Murder,” The Economist 345, no. 8039 (18 October 1997): 47. “Why Pagodas Don’t Fall Down,” The Economist 345, no. 8048 (20 December 1997): 121. Complicated Judith Shulevitz, “Prematurely Correct,” New York Times Book Review, 14 December 1997, p. 18. Isabelle de Courtivron, “Rebel without a Cause,” New York Times Book Review, 14 December 1997, p. 14. “Those Magical Mushrooms,” The Economist 345, no. 8098 (20 December 1997): 95. “The Birth of a New Species,” The Economist 339, no. 7967 (25 May 1996): 4. Conditioned “Greeting the Dragon,” The Economist 345, no. 8040 (25 October 1997): 15. “A Beauty Is Born,” The Economist 345, no. 8040 (25 October 1997): 94. “Crash, Dammit,” The Economist 345, no. 8039 (18 October 1997): 13. Max Frankel, “A Case of Sheep v. Coyotes,” New York Times Magazine, 21 December 1997, p. 30. “Glittering Gadfly,” The Economist 346, no. 8054 (7 February 1998): 65. “Watching Where You Eat,” The Economist 346, no. 8053 (31 January 1998): 87. Multiplied Sarah Boxer, “One Casualty of the Women’s Movement: Feminism,” New York Times, 14 December 1997, sec. 4, p. 3. “Those Magical Mushrooms,” The Economist 345, no. 8048 (20 December 1997): 93. Jack Miles, “Religion Makes a Comeback (Belief to Follow),” New York Times Magazine, 7 December 1997, p. 56. Jeffrey Rosen, “The New Look of Liberalism on the Court,” New York Times Magazine, 5 October 1997, p. 60. 2. OCCASIONAL SHORT FORMS Fragments Robert J. Samuelson, “The Attack Culture,” Washington Post, 12 March 1997, sec. A, p. 19. Louis Menand, “How Eliot Became Eliot,” New York Review of Books 54, no. 8 (15 May 1997): 27. “Back to the Garage,” The Economist 339, no. 7967 (25 May 1996): 5. “If Wall Street Falters,” The Economist 340, no. 7973 (6 July 1996): 119. To start a paragraph or point Stanley Kauffmann, Distinguishing Features (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), p. 10. “Too Far on Forfeitures,” New York Times, 26 June 1996, sec. A, p. 18. “A Surprise in the Woods,” The Economist 344, no. 8026 (19 July 1997): p. 31. What’s Going On (Washington, D.C.: Benton Foundation, 1997), p. 10. To finish a paragraph or point Paul Krugman, “Does Getting Old Cost Society Too Much?” New York Times Magazine, 9 March 1997, p. 60. James Surowiecki, “The Publisher’s Curse,” New York Times Magazine, 31 May 1998, p. 24. “Time for Reform?” The Economist 345, no. 8044 (22 November 1997): 65. Jeffrey Goldberg, “Our Africa,” New York Times Magazine, 2 March 1997, p. 35. Pairs and trios Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Literature (1980; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 5. Michael Lewis, Liar’s Poker (New York: Penguin, 1989), p. 13. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 22. Cicero, on Julius Caesar. 3. DRAMATIC FLOURISHES Interruptive dashes Hubert B. Herring, “Diary,” New York Times, 18 May 1997, sec. 4, p. 2. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 15. Paul Berman, “Biker Days,” New Yorker Magazine 71, no. 22 (31 July 1995): 78. Michiko Kakutani, “Planet of the Blind: Passing as a Person Who Can See,” New York Times, 23 December 1997, sec. E, p. 6. Imperatives “America the Unmighty,” The Economist 345, no. 8045 (29 November 1997): 17. Edwin Dobb, “Where the Good Begins,” Harper’s 297, no. 1778 (July 1998): 60. “The Tyranny of Success,” in A Survey of the Software Industry (insert), The Economist 339, no. 7967 (25 May 1996): 9. “System Failure,” in International Banking Survey, The Economist 339, no. 7963 (27 April 1996): 6. Direct address James K. Glassman, washingtonpost.com, 11 June 1997. “We Know You’re Reading This,” The Economist 338, no. 7952 (10 February 1996): 27. Mary Lee Settle, Turkish Reflections: A Biography of a Place (1991; New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992), p. xvii. “The Next Revolution,” in A Survey of Business in Eastern Europe, The Economist 345, no. 8044 (22 November 1997): 3. Recasts Andrew Sullivan, “When Plagues End,” New York Times Magazine, 10 November 1996, p. 55. Jack Miles, “Religion Makes a Comeback. (Belief to Follow),” New York Times Magazine, 7 December 1997, p. 58. Michiko Kakutani, “Planet of the Blind: Passing as a Person Who Can See,” New York Times, 23 December 1997, sec. E, p. 6. Jack Miles, “Religion Makes a Comeback. (Belief to Follow),” New York Times Magazine, 7 December 1997, p. 56. Reversals Paul Krugman, “Does Getting Old Cost Society Too Much?” New York Times Magazine, 9 March 1997, p. 60. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 7. Vivian Gornick, “An American Exile in America,” New York Times Magazine, 2 March 1997, p. 28. Primo Levi, Other People’s Trades (London: Michael Joseph, 1989; London: Abacus, 1990), p. 27. Inversions “The End of the Miracle?” The Economist 345, no. 8047 (13 December 1997): 18. “Lean Enough?” The Economist 338, no. 7952 (10 February 1996): 60. Kevin Barry, “Still Clueless,” New York Times Book Review, 7 December 1997, p. 46. Michiko Kakutani, “To Hell with Him,” New York Times Magazine, 7 December 1997, p. 38. Cascades Mary Lee Settle, Turkish Reflections: A Biography of a Place (1991; New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992), p. 35. Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Literature (1980; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 285. Elizabeth Marshall Thomas, “Horse Sense,” New York Review of Books 44, no. 8 (15 May 1997): 11. Lawrence Weschler, “When Fountainheads Collide,” New Yorker Magazine 73, no. 38 (8 December 1997): 67. First and last “The Birth of a New Species,” in A Survey of the Software Industry (insert), The Economist 339, no. 7967 (25 May 1996): 3. Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Literature (1980; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 3. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 5. William Safire, “Day of Infamy,” New York Times Magazine, 7 December 1997, p. 30. Exclamations Michael Kinsley, Op-Ed, Washington Post, 16 April 1997, sec. A, p. 17. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 34. David Wallace, “Lost Luggage,” New York Times Magazine, 21 December 1997, p. 19. Daniel D’Ambrosio, “Leggo My Logo,” New York Times Magazine, 5 October 1997, p. 23. Interjections Richard Cohen, “The Army’s Search and Self-Destroy Mission,” Washington Post, 5 June 1997, sec. A, p. 21. “Tough at the Top,” The Economist 338, no. 7947 (6 January 1996): 47. Mary Cantwell, “Still at Work on a Self,” New York Times Magazine, 9 March 1997, p. 57. James Baldwin, Notes of a Native Son (Boston: Beacon, 1955, 1957, 1983), p. 15. Highlights “System Failure,” in International Banking Survey, The Economist 339, no. 7963 (27 April 1996): 6. Richard Wright, 12 Million Black Voices (New York: Viking, 1941), p. 99. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 9. “Plenty of Gloom,” The Economist 345, no. 8048 (20 December 1997): 20. 4. ELEGANT REPETITIONS Word Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Literature (1980; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 3. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 6. Henry Han Xi Lau, “I Was a Member of the Kung Fu Crew,” New York Times Magazine, 19 October 1997, p. 54. Mary Lee Settle, Turkish Reflections: A Biography of a Place (1991; New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992), p. 17. Root “Stop the Rot,” The Economist 350, no. 8102 (16 January 1999): 19. Primo Levi, Other People’s Trades (London: Michael Joseph, 1989; London: Abacus, 1990), p. 27. “The Birth of a New Species,” in A Survey of the Software Industry (insert), The Economist 339, no. 7967 (25 May 1996): 3. Stanley Kauffmann, “sex, lies, and videotape,” in Distinguishing Features (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), p. 133. Prefix or suffix Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 33. Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Literature (1980; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 372. Michael Parfit, “Breathless,” New York Times Book Review, 7 December 1997, p. 24. Michael Lewis, “Heartless Donors,” New York Times Magazine, 14 December 1997, p. 46. Preposition Richard Wright, 12 Million Black Voices (New York: Viking, 1941), p. 100. Henry R. Luce, The American Century (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941), p. 15. Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Literature (1980; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 5. Elisabeth Bumiller, “The Politics of Personality,” New York Times Magazine, 2 November 1997, p. 38. Sound Merriam-Webster Online Edition of Explorer (m~w.com), 16 December 1997. “System Failure,” in International Banking Survey, The Economist 339, no. 7963 (27 April 1996): 6. Michiko Kakutani, “Taking Out the Trash,” New York Times Magazine, 8 June 1997, p. 34. William Shakespeare, Richard II 1.2.74. Structure “We Know You’re Reading This,” The Economist 338, no. 7952 (10 February 1996): 27. Robert Harris, “I, Spy,” New Yorker Magazine 73, no. 15 (9 June 1997): 98. “The Birth of a New Species,” in A Survey of the Software Industry (insert), The Economist 339, no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feminism, Postfeminism, Liz Lemonism: Comedy and Gender Politics on 30 Rock
    Genders 1998-2013 Genders 1998-2013 Genders 1998-2013 Home (/gendersarchive1998-2013/) Feminism, Postfeminism, Liz Lemonism: Comedy and Gender Politics on 30 Rock Feminism, Postfeminism, Liz Lemonism: Comedy and Gender Politics on 30 Rock May 1, 2012 • By Linda Mizejewski (/gendersarchive1998-2013/linda-mizejewski) [1] The title of Tina Fey's humorous 2011 memoir, Bossypants, suggests how closely Fey is identified with her Emmy-award winning NBC sitcom 30 Rock (2006-), where she is the "boss"—the show's creator, star, head writer, and executive producer. Fey's reputation as a feminist—indeed, as Hollywood's Token Feminist, as some journalists have wryly pointed out—heavily inflects the character she plays, the "bossy" Liz Lemon, whose idealistic feminism is a mainstay of her characterization and of the show's comedy. Fey's comedy has always focused on gender, beginning with her work on Saturday Night Live (SNL) where she became that show's first female head writer in 1999. A year later she moved from behind the scenes to appear in the "Weekend Update" sketches, attracting national attention as a gifted comic with a penchant for zeroing in on women's issues. Fey's connection to feminist politics escalated when she returned to SNL for guest appearances during the presidential campaign of 2008, first in a sketch protesting the sexist media treatment of Hillary Clinton, and more forcefully, in her stunning imitations of vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, which launched Fey into national politics and prominence. [2] On 30 Rock, Liz Lemon is the head writer of an NBC comedy much likeSNL, and she is identified as a "third wave feminist" on the pilot episode.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Annual Report Table of Contents the Michael J
    Roadmaps for Progress 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Annual Report Table of Contents The Michael J. Fox Foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for 2 A Note from Michael Parkinson’s disease through an 4 Annual Letter from the CEO and the Co-Founder aggressively funded research agenda 6 Roadmaps for Progress and to ensuring the development of 8 2017 in Photos improved therapies for those living 10 2017 Donor Listing 16 Legacy Circle with Parkinson’s today. 18 Industry Partners 26 Corporate Gifts 32 Tributees 36 Recurring Gifts 39 Team Fox 40 Team Fox Lifetime MVPs 46 The MJFF Signature Series 47 Team Fox in Photos 48 Financial Highlights 54 Credits 55 Boards and Councils Milestone Markers Throughout the book, look for stories of some of the dedicated Michael J. Fox Foundation community members whose generosity and collaboration are moving us forward. 1 The Michael J. Fox Foundation 2017 Annual Report “What matters most isn’t getting diagnosed with Parkinson’s, it’s A Note from what you do next. Michael J. Fox The choices we make after we’re diagnosed Dear Friend, can open doors to One of the great gifts of my life is that I've been in a position to take my experience with Parkinson's and combine it with the perspectives and expertise of others to accelerate possibilities you’d improved treatments and a cure. never imagine.’’ In 2017, thanks to your generosity and fierce belief in our shared mission, we moved closer to this goal than ever before. For helping us put breakthroughs within reach — thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots of Anger3 Notes
    The Real Explanation for the Tax Rebellion and the Size of Government H. William Batt, Ph.D., February 16, 2011 The antipathy toward taxes, and by extension toward government itself, has its roots, I believe, in a distortion of economic theory that took place a century ago. Prior to that time, there was a tacit, if not explicit, understanding that the wealth and bounty that grew from common effort along with the gifts of nature should be the source of finance recaptured by society and used to pay for public services. Since surplus economic productivity is jointly produced, it was the proper source of taxation. Only government can appropriately provide these services since they are in today's language "public goods." On the other hand, wealth that was created by the people's own brains and brawn was rightfully theirs and theirs alone. Taxing people's labor, or the products thereof, was not only wrong but was tantamount to theft.1 Today the resentment people feel about taxes on their hard-earned money has reached a point close to delegitimizing the income tax and government itself. Estimates of actual tax cheating are put at about 15 percent, but fully half the population believes that it would be okay to cheat if one wouldn’t be caught.2 It has taken over a century for this all to explode. But taking the long view of tax history one could argue that this is not only understandable but also inevitable. Had economic arrangements been done as they were in earlier times there would likely be far less such resistance to taxation and perhaps even a sense of social duty to pay one’s share of taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatization in Russia: Catalyst for the Elite
    PRIVATIZATION IN RUSSIA: CATALYST FOR THE ELITE VIRGINIE COULLOUDON During the fall of 1997, the Russian press exposed a corruption scandal in- volving First Deputy Prime Minister Anatoli Chubais, and several other high- ranking officials of the Russian government.' In a familiar scenario, news organizations run by several bankers involved in the privatization process published compromising material that prompted the dismissal of the politi- 2 cians on bribery charges. The main significance of the so-called "Chubais affair" is not that it pro- vides further evidence of corruption in Russia. Rather, it underscores the im- portance of the scandal's timing in light of the prevailing economic environment and privatization policy. It shows how deliberate this political campaign was in removing a rival on the eve of the privatization of Rosneft, Russia's only remaining state-owned oil and gas company. The history of privatization in Russia is riddled with scandals, revealing the critical nature of the struggle for state funding in Russia today. At stake is influence over defining the rules of the political game. The aim of this article is to demonstrate how privatization in Russia gave birth to an oligarchic re- gime and how, paradoxically, it would eventually destroy that very oligar- chy. This article intends to study how privatization influenced the creation of the present elite structure and how it may further transform Russian decision making in the foreseeable future. Privatization is generally seen as a prerequisite to a market economy, which in turn is considered a sine qua non to establishing a democratic regime. But some Russian analysts and political leaders disagree with this approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: CHRONOLOGY DECEMBER 1993 to FEBRUARY 1995
    Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/CHRONO... Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets Home Issue Paper RUSSIA CHRONOLOGY DECEMBER 1993 TO FEBRUARY 1995 July 1995 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This document is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Table of Contents GLOSSARY Political Organizations and Government Structures Political Leaders 1. INTRODUCTION 2. CHRONOLOGY 1993 1994 1995 3. APPENDICES TABLE 1: SEAT DISTRIBUTION IN THE STATE DUMA TABLE 2: REPUBLICS AND REGIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION MAP 1: RUSSIA 1 of 58 9/17/2013 9:13 AM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/CHRONO... MAP 2: THE NORTH CAUCASUS NOTES ON SELECTED SOURCES REFERENCES GLOSSARY Political Organizations and Government Structures [This glossary is included for easy reference to organizations which either appear more than once in the text of the chronology or which are known to have been formed in the period covered by the chronology. The list is not exhaustive.] All-Russia Democratic Alternative Party. Established in February 1995 by Grigorii Yavlinsky.( OMRI 15 Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    NOTES Introduction 1. Robert Kagan to George Packer. Cited in Packer’s The Assassin’s Gate: America In Iraq (Faber and Faber, London, 2006): 38. 2. Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neoconservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004): 9. 3. Critiques of the war on terror and its origins include Gary Dorrien, Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana (Routledge, New York and London, 2004); Francis Fukuyama, After the Neocons: America At the Crossroads (Profile Books, London, 2006); Ira Chernus, Monsters to Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin (Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO and London, 2006); and Jacob Heilbrunn, They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Doubleday, New York, 2008). 4. A report of the PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, September 2000: 76. URL: http:// www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf (15 January 2009). 5. On the first generation on Cold War neoconservatives, which has been covered far more extensively than the second, see Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture and the War of Ideology (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1993); Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1979); Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005); Murray Friedman ed. Commentary in American Life (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2005); Mark Gerson, The Neoconservative Vision: From the Cold War to the Culture Wars (Madison Books, Lanham MD; New York; Oxford, 1997); and Maria Ryan, “Neoconservative Intellectuals and the Limitations of Governing: The Reagan Administration and the Demise of the Cold War,” Comparative American Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Goldberg's
    ANDREW GOLDBERG Emmy Award-winning investigate producer/director Andrew Goldberg is the founder and owner of Two Cats Productions in New York City. In this capacity he has Executive Produced and Directed 13 Prime- Time documentary specials for PBS and Public Television, two broadcast series (spanning 39 episodes) for HGTV and DIY, and countless long and short-form segments for such outlets as CBS News Sunday Morning, ABC News, National Public Radio, E! Entertainment Television, Food Network, and FYI. He has worked with and/or interviewed more celebrities than he can remember including Ed Harris, Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, Maya Angelou, Michael Douglas, Natalie Portman, Itzhak Perlman, Julianna Margulies, Senator Joseph Lieberman, Shaquille O’Neal, Senator Bob Dole, The President of Armenia (random but true), Julianne Moore, Yo-Yo Ma, Elliot Gould, Olympia Dukakis, Pierce Brosnan, Edie Falco, Kristen Bell, Laura Linney, the legendary Walter Cronkite… and many more. Andrew is currently directing two films including a fully funded, feature documentary, currently in post- production, that explores the complex relationship between humans and animals. The film questions how animals are both respected in the world but also used for food, science, textiles and entertainment. He is also in post-production on two hour documentary that takes a look at the resurgence in anti- Semitism in the world today. Some of other previous films include: The Armenian Genocide which received extraordinary reviews and coverage in almost every major newspaper in the US including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post and The Boston Globe.
    [Show full text]
  • US Views on a Permanent International Criminal Court
    The Quivering Gulliver: U.S. Views on a Permanent International Criminal Court JOHN F. MURPHY* I. Introduction As noted by other contributors to this symposium, the United States found itself among a small minority of strange bedfellows when it voted against the draft statute for a permanent international criminal court adopted by the United Nations-sponsored conference in Rome, Italy on July 17, 1998.1 The U.S. vote against the Rome Statute stands in sharp contrast to strong statements of support for a permanent international criminal court by President Clinton and other members of his administration.2 At first blush one is inclined to explain away this discrepancy by focusing on U.S. objections to specific provisions of the Rome Statute. If particular provisions of the Rome Statute are the basis for U.S. opposition, then one could expect that the problem could be resolved by amending the statute. It is the premise of this article, however, that the basic problem is more profound. In this writer's opinion, current U.S. views on the role of the United States in foreign affairs and on international law and international institutions ensured that when the final moment of decision arrived, the United States would be unable to support the establishment of a permanent international criminal court not subject to the control of the United States. Moreover, these U.S. views pose problems that greatly transcend the issue of whether to support a permanent international criminal court. They call into question the willingness of the United States to adhere to the rule of law in international affairs-a concept that U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Litigation Lobby
    CENTER FOR LEGAL POLICY AT THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE C L P STREET NW A REPORT ON THE LITIGATION LOBBY 2010 A Message from the Director merica’s litigation-friendly legal system continues to im- law is, for the most part, crafted by state judges rather than en- A pose a heavy burden on our economy. The annual direct acted by state legislatures, these efforts have centered on ensuring cost of American tort litigation—excluding much securities liti- a friendly judiciary, whether appointed or elected. gation, punitive damages, and the multibillion-dollar settlement With business groups now fighting back against Trial Lawyers, reached between the tobacco companies and the states in 1998— Inc.’s longtime grip on state judiciaries, the litigation lobby has exceeds $250 billion, almost 2 percent of gross domestic prod- turned its attention to state legislatures, where it is not only block- uct.1 The indirect costs of excessive litigiousness (for example, the ing tort reforms but working to expand its portfolio of litigation unnecessary tests and procedures characterizing the practice of opportunities. Among other things, state legislators are authoriz- “defensive” medicine, or the loss of the fruits of research never ing new kinds of lawsuits, raising damage caps, and giving private undertaken on account of the risk of abusive lawsuits) are prob- lawyers authority to sue on behalf of the state. ably much greater than the direct costs themselves.2 Of course, the growth in federal regulation and law has made Of course, tort litigation does do some good, and it does deter it necessary for Trial Lawyers, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Orthodox Church Under Patriarch Aleksii II and the Russian State: an Unholy Alliance?
    The Russian Orthodox Church under Patriarch Aleksii II and the Russian State: An Unholy Alliance? LESLIE L. MCGANN ike most present-day Russian institutions, the Russian Orthodox Church is in L the process of defining a role for itself amidst the political, social, and eco- nomic turbulence of postcommunist Russia. The Russian Orthodox Church is unique, however, because it enjoys an unrivaled degree of respect and legitima- cy as the embodiment of Russia’s spiritual past and is invested with a national historic tradition that carries great mythical power. This respect and legitimacy have been supplied and acknowledged by the population at large and by the polit- ical elite, and have been reinforced by the collective memory of seventy years of systematic and often brutal repression suffered by the church at the hands of the Soviet state. But to what ends is the church hierarchy, under the leadership of Patriarch Aleksii II, using the immense power that it wields in today’s Russia? How, and to what ends are secular authorities taking advantage of that power? Anyone attempting an assessment of the church’s present role will almost imme- diately have his or her attention drawn to the large number of press articles on the church’s dealings with political powers. The sheer amount of publicity and high- profile political activity surrounding Patriarch Aleksii in particular and the Russian Orthodox Church in general makes one wonder whether the church does indeed stand above the political fray, as its hierarchs claim, or whether it is in fact deeply enmeshed in that fray as merely another champion of its own vested interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Gilded Age
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 The New Gilded Age In the first sentence of one of the greatest works of modern po liti cal sci­ ence, Robert Dahl posed a question of profound importance for demo cratic theory and practice: “In a po liti cal system where nearly every adult may vote but where knowledge, wealth, social position, access to officials, and other resources are unequally distributed, who actually governs?”1 Dahl’s answer to this question, for one American city in the late 1950s, was that po liti cal power was surprisingly widely dispersed. Examining politics and policy making in New Haven, Connecticut, he concluded that shifting, largely distinct co ali tions of elected and unelected leaders influ­ enced key decisions in different issue areas. This pluralistic pattern was facilitated by the fact that many individuals and groups with substantial resources at their disposal chose not to devote those resources to po liti cal activity. Even “economic notables”—the wealthy property owners, busi­ nessmen, and bank directors constituting the top tier of New Haven’s economic elite—were “simply one of the many groups out of which indi­ viduals sporadically emerge to influence the policies and acts of city offi­ cials.”2 The significance of Dahl’s question has been magnified, and the pertinence of his answer has been cast in doubt, by dramatic economic and po litical changes in the United States over the past half- century.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating News at the White House
    "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House CAROL PAULI* I. INTRODUCTION II. WHITE HOUSE PRESS BRIEFINGS A. PressBriefing as Negotiation B. The Parties and Their Power, Generally C. Ghosts in the Briefing Room D. Zone ofPossibleAgreement III. THE NEW ADMINISTRATION A. The Parties and Their Power, 2016-2017 B. White House Moves 1. NOVEMBER 22: POSITIONING 2. JANUARY 11: PLAYING TIT-FOR-TAT a. Tit-for-Tat b. Warning or Threat 3. JANUARY 21: ANCHORING AND MORE a. Anchoring b. Testing the Press c. Taunting the Press d. Changingthe GroundRules e. Devaluing the Offer f. MisdirectingPress Attention * Associate Professor, Texas A&M University School of Law; J.D. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; M.S. Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism; former writer and editor for the Associated Press broadcast wire; former writer and producer for CBS News; former writer for the Evansville (IN) Sunday Courier& Press and the Decatur (IL) Herald-Review. I am grateful for the encouragement and generosity of colleagues at Texas A&M University School of Law, especially Professor Cynthia Alkon, Professor Susan Fortney, Professor Guillermo Garcia, Professor Neil Sobol, and Professor Nancy Welsh. I also appreciate the helpful comments of members of the AALS section on Dispute Resolution, particularly Professor Noam Ebner, Professor Caroline Kaas, Professor David Noll, and Professor Richard Reuben. Special thanks go to longtime Associated Press White House Correspondent, Mark Smith, who kindly read a late draft of this article, made candid corrections, and offered valuable observations from his experience on the front lines (actually, the second row) of the White House press room.
    [Show full text]