Introduction to Terror Course Level 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Terror Course Level 1 Infowar School Terrorism Course Level 1 False Flag Terrorism 1 www.infowarschool.com Infowar School Terrorism Course Level 1 False Flag Terrorism Terrorism Course Level 1 False Flag Terrorism By Shaun Almeida This is a free publication from the Infowar School created to raise awareness about the New World Order. Please share this book with everyone. Click here to check the Infowar School Library for the latest version of this course PDF. Published online by Infowarschool.com 2021 Version 1.0 2 www.infowarschool.com Infowar School Terrorism Course Level 1 False Flag Terrorism Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION TO TERROR COURSE LEVEL 1..............................................................................5 TWO ADMITTED EXAMPLES OF FALSE FLAG TERROR...........................................................................................5 OPERATION GLADIO.........................................................................................................................................6 OPERATION NORTHWOODS...................................................................................................................7 THE PURPOSE OF OPERATION NORTHWOODS.......................................................................................................8 THE PEOPLE AND AGENCIES INVOLVED IN OPERATION NORTHWOODS....................................................................9 Those Who Were Directly Involved And Knew It Was All A Lie To Frame Cuba.................................9 Unknowing Co-conspirators - Those Who Are Indirectly Involved.....................................................10 Other Types Of Conspirators................................................................................................................10 THE N.W.O. ARE WILLING TO GO TO GREAT LENGTHS TO CREATE AN ENTIRE FALSE STORY...........................11 TACTICS FROM OPERATION NORTHWOODS TO USE AGAINST CUBA......................................................................13 Use A Military Exercise to Scare Cuba into Defending Itself..............................................................13 Create A Series Of Fake Incidents Around The American Base At Guantanamo Bay And Blame The Cubans For It........................................................................................................................................13 Sink A Ship And Blame It On Cuba......................................................................................................14 Create A Campaign Of Terror In Florida And Surrounding States And In Washington.....................15 Fake An Attack On A Civilian Airliner By Cubans..............................................................................16 Pretend To Shoot Down American Air Force Jet.................................................................................17 FALSE FLAG TERROR.............................................................................................................................18 WHO USES FALSE FLAGS ...............................................................................................................................18 REAL EXAMPLES OF FALSE FLAG TERROR........................................................................................................20 THE USS MAINE.........................................................................................................................................26 THE SINKING OF THE LUSITANIA......................................................................................................27 WAS IT REALLY A FALSE FLAG?.....................................................................................................................27 WHY SINK THE LUSITANIA?...........................................................................................................................28 SETTING UP THE LUCITANIA BEFORE THE ATTACK.............................................................................................30 RULES ON WHAT SHIPS TO ATTACK.................................................................................................................30 BRITISH IGNORE THE RULES OF WAR PUTTING INNOCENT PEOPLE AT RISK............................................................31 Britain Caught Violating the Cruiser Rules.........................................................................................31 GERMANY DECLARES WAR ZONE SAYS EVEN NEUTRAL SHIPS NOT SAFE............................................................31 NEUTRAL AMERICAN SHIPS ARE NOW POSSIBLE TARGETS..................................................................................31 LUCITANIA IS SPECIFICALLY MADE A TARGET BY NAME BY MAKING IT KNOWN IT IS VIOLATING THE CRUISER RULES ....................................................................................................................................................................32 WILSON SETS THE STAGE FOR GOING TO WAR BY HOLDING GERMANS STRICTLY ACCOUNTABLE IF THEY FIRE ON AN AMERICAN FLAGGED SHIP...............................................................................................................................33 AND NOT DISCOURAGING THE BRITISH FROM FLYING THE AMERICAN FLAG ON THEIR SHIPS...................................33 MAKING SURE THERE WOULD BE AMERICAN PASSENGERS.................................................................................33 PUTTING GUNCOTTON ON THE SHIP TO MAKE SURE THE LUCITANIA SINKS AND DOES IT QUICKLY..........................34 THERE WAS KNOWN SUBMARINE ACTIVITY IN THE AREA...................................................................................34 TAKING THE ESCORT AWAY ...........................................................................................................................35 MAKING THE TARGET EASIER TO HIT..............................................................................................................35 THE ATTACK.................................................................................................................................................35 MAKING SURE AMERICANS DIED.....................................................................................................................36 THE COVER UP.............................................................................................................................................37 THE UNITED STATES FINALLY ENTERS THE WAR...............................................................................................37 PEARL HARBOR........................................................................................................................................39 3 www.infowarschool.com Infowar School Terrorism Course Level 1 False Flag Terrorism THEIR COVER STORY 'REASONING' FOR THE ATTACK.........................................................................................40 F.D.R. AND MCCOLLUM DEVELOPED A STRATEGY TO PROVOKE THE JAPANESE...................................................41 THE N.W.O. PLANTS THE PACIFIC FLEET AT PEARL HARBOR AS BAIT FOR THE JAPANESE......................................43 JAPANESE NAVAL AND DIPLOMATIC CODES WERE BROKEN.................................................................................43 PRIOR WARNINGS FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES WERE HIDDEN FROM PEARL HARBOR...............................................48 PEARL NOT WAS ALLOWED TO DEFEND ITSELF................................................................................................50 KIMMEL AND SHORT SET UP AS PATSIES FOR THE ATTACK................................................................................51 PACIFIC CLEARED OF SHIPPING........................................................................................................................51 GULF OF TONKIN ATTACK...................................................................................................................52 USS LIBERTY..............................................................................................................................................53 WHY WOULD ISRAEL STAGE AN ATTACK ON THE USS LIBERTY.............................................................................54 THE SET UP OF THE USS LIBERTY....................................................................................................................54 ISRAEL KNEW IT WAS AN AMERICAN SHIP AND EXACTLY WHAT SHIP IT WAS...................................................55 THEY WANTED EVERYONE DEAD AND THE SHIP SUNK.......................................................................................56 HELP WAS DENIED TO THE SHIP.....................................................................................................................57 THE COVER-UP.............................................................................................................................................59 ISLAMIC TERRORISM.............................................................................................................................61 CREATING ISRAEL MADE THE MODERN ISLAMIC TERRORISTS...............................................................................62 THE BALFOUR DECLARATION...........................................................................................................................62 EXPANDING THE STATE OF ISRAEL AND CREATING THE
Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to loe removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 WASHINGTON IRVING CHAMBERS: INNOVATION, PROFESSIONALIZATION, AND THE NEW NAVY, 1872-1919 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorof Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephen Kenneth Stein, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1925 Monkey Trial
    The “Monkey Trial” March 1925. • On 21st March 1925 Tennessee passed the Butler Act which stated: • That it shall be unlawful for any teacher in any of the Universities, Normals and all other public schools of the State which are supported in whole or in part by the public school funds of the State, to teach any theory that denies the Story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals. Proposer of the act: John Washington Butler. Religion vs. Science. • (State Representative) John W. Butler, a Tennessee farmer and head of the World Christian Fundamentals Association, lobbied state legislatures to pass the anti-evolution law. The act is challenged. • John Thomas Scopes' involvement in the so-called Scopes Monkey Trial came about after the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announced that it would finance a test case challenging the constitutionality of the Butler Act if they could find a Tennessee teacher willing to act as a defendant. • Photograph of John Scopes taken one month before the trial. Opportunistic Bush Lawyers? • A band of businessmen in Dayton, Tennessee, led by engineer and geologist George Rappleyea, saw this as an opportunity to get publicity for their town and approached Scopes. • Rappleyea pointed out that while the Butler Act prohibited the teaching of human evolution, the state required teachers to use the assigned textbook, Hunter's Civic Biology (1914), which included a chapter on evolution. • Rappleyea argued that teachers were essentially required to break the law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scopes Trial, Antievolutionism, and the Last Crusade of William Jennings Bryan
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2012 Six Days of Twenty-Four Hours: the Scopes Trial, Antievolutionism, and the Last Crusade of William Jennings Bryan Kari Lynn Edwards Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Edwards, Kari Lynn, "Six Days of Twenty-Four Hours: the Scopes Trial, Antievolutionism, and the Last Crusade of William Jennings Bryan" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 96. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/96 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SIX DAYS OF TWENTY-FOUR HOURS: THE SCOPES TRIAL, ANTIEVOLUTIONISM, AND THE LAST CRUSADE OF WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYAN A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Southern Studies The University of Mississippi by KARI EDWARDS May 2012 Copyright Kari Edwards 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT The academic study of the Scopes Trial has always been approached from a traditional legal interpretation. This project seeks to reframe the conventional arguments surrounding the trial, treating it instead as a significant religious event, one which not only altered the course of Christian Fundamentalism and the Creationist movement, but also perpetuated Southern religious stereotypes through the intense, and largely negative, nationwide publicity it attracted. Prosecutor William Jennings Bryan's crucial role is also redefined, with his denial of a strictly literal interpretation of Genesis during the trial serving as the impetus for the shift toward ultra- conservatism and young-earth Creationism within the movement after 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • Ally Advocacy, Identity Reconfiguration, and Political Change
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: “THE FIGHT IS YOURS”: ALLY ADVOCACY, IDENTITY RECONFIGURATION, AND POLITICAL CHANGE William Howell, Doctor of Philosophy, 2020 Dissertation directed by: Dr. Trevor Parry-Giles, Department of Communication Since at least 1990, scholars and activists have used the term “ally” to describe and theorize a distinct sociopolitical role: someone from a majority identity group working to end that group’s oppression of another identity group. While the term is recent, “allies” are present throughout America’s constant struggle to actualize equality and justice. The identity-rooted ideologies that empowered allies disempowered the groups for and with whom they sought justice and equality. But those empowering identities were pieces, more or less salient, of complex intersectional people. Given the shared nature of identity, this process also necessarily pitted allies against those with whom they shared an identity. In this project, I ask two questions about past ally advocacy—questions that are often asked about contemporary ally advocacy. First, in moments of major civil rights reform, how did allies engage their own intersecting identities—especially those ideologically-charged identities with accrued power from generations of marginalizing and oppressing? Second, how did allies engage other identities that were not theirs—especially identities on whose oppression their privilege was built? In asking these two questions—about self-identity and others’ identity—I assemble numerous rhetorical fragments into “ally advocacy.” This bricolage is in recognition of rhetoric’s fragmentary nature, and in response to Michael Calvin McGee’s call to assemble texts for criticism. I intend to demonstrate that ally advocacy is such a text, manifesting (among other contexts) around the women’s suffrage amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the marriage equality movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roosevelt Myth
    THE ROOSEVELT MYTH BY JOHN T. FLYNN (1948) Flynn was a political reporter who supported the populist objectives of FDR early in his career but became an ardent critic later on, as he saw the blunders and corruption of the Roosevelt administration covered up by a compliant press. FDR was always portrayed as a peace-loving populist on the side of the "little guy" while many of his advisors were war mongers, communist sympathizers, and agents of Wall Street. This expose is a much needed corrective to the 'myth' of Roosevelt populism. TABLE OF CONTENTS BOOK I: TRIAL AND ERROR NEW DEALER TAKES THE DECK ............................................................... 3 THE HUNDRED DAYS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 THE BANKING CRISIS .................................................................................................................................... 11 THE NEW NEW DEAL..................................................................................................................................... 21 THE RABBITS GO BACK IN THE HAT ............................................................................................................ 26 THE DANCE OF THE CRACKPOTS ................................................................................................................. 38 AN ENEMY IS WELCOMED ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Mr. President, How Long Must Women Wait for Liberty?”1
    “Mr. President, How Long Must Women Wait for Liberty?”1 Mallory Durlauf Junior Division Individual Historical Paper Women, it rests with us. We have got to bring to the President, individually, day by day, week in and week out, the idea that great numbers of women want to be free, will be free, and want to know what he is going to do about it. - Harriot Stanton Blatch, 19172 An important chapter in American history is the climax of the battle for woman suffrage. In 1917, members of the National Woman’s Party escalated their efforts from lobbying to civil disobedience. These brave women aimed their protests at President Woodrow Wilson, picketing the White House as “Silent Sentinels” and displaying statements from Wilson’s speeches to show his hypocrisy in not supporting suffrage. The public’s attention was aroused by the arrest and detention of these women. This reaction was strengthened by the mistreatment of the women in jail, particularly their force-feeding. In 1917, when confronted by the tragedy of the jailed suffragists, prominent political figures and the broader public recognized Wilson’s untenable position that democracy could exist without national suffrage. The suffragists triumphed when Wilson changed his stance and announced his support for the federal suffrage amendment. The struggle for American woman suffrage began in 1848 when the first women’s rights convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York. The movement succeeded in securing suffrage for four states, but slipped into the so-called “doldrums” period (1896-1910) during which no states adopted suffrage.3 After the Civil War, the earlier suffrage groups merged into the National American Woman’s Suffrage Association (NAWSA), but their original aggressiveness waned.4 Meanwhile, in Britain, militant feminism had appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm I C R O S O F T W O R
    Copernic Agent Search Results Search: Gulf of Aden war ship battle portal (All the words) Found: 1019 result(s) on _Full.Search Date: 7/23/2010 11:06:20 AM 1. Indian Frigate Sinks Pirate Ship in Gulf of Aden ... NEW DELHI, Nov. 19 -- An Indian navy frigate battled with and sank a vessel described as a pirate mother ship in the Gulf of Aden, one of the world's busiest and most ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/19/AR2008111900364.html 94% 2. Pirate Attack in the Gulf of Aden Michael Briant completed a circumnaviagion in Bambola reports on Pirates, Red Sea Anchorages lightning strikes, French Canal routes and all the fun of blue water ... http://www.michaelbriant.com/attacked.htm 93% 3. What is Happening in the Gulf of Aden? « Revolutionizing Awareness It has a Swirl Pattern just Like A Portal In ... those who have been in charge of making war ... French Ship Guepratte Provides a Presence in Gulf of Aden http://revolutionizingawareness.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/what-is-happening-in-the-gulf-of-aden/ 93% 4. Piracy in Somalia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... 11 May 2010, Somali pirates seized a Bulgarian-flagged ship in the Gulf of Aden. ... increased war insurance premium due to the high risk off the Gulf of Aden."[80] ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy_in_Somalia 92% 5. Shippers urge naval blockade of Somali coast World news channel covers Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Europe, America and Africa. Chinadaily.com.cn is the largest English portal in China, providing news, business ..
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston Village Society Inc 1127 West 4Th Street. Lorain, Ohio 44052 E-Mail [email protected] Tel: 440-246-6046
    Charleston Village Society Inc 1127 West 4th Street. Lorain, Ohio 44052 E-mail [email protected] Tel: 440-246-6046 For the attention of State Representative Dan Ramos District 56 Dear State Representative Ramos and the House Armed Services, Veterans Affairs and Homeland Security Committee, Re: House Bill 579- declaring November 23rd as Admiral Ernest Joseph King Day for the State of Ohio. As you are probably aware Admiral Ernest J King was born was born November 23rd 1878 only a hundred yards from the shore of Lake Erie, in a small cottage that is still standing on the east side of Hamilton Street ( Ave) No. 113} Lorain Ohio. From those humble beginnings Ernest J King went on to an illustrious career with numerous honors throughout that career such as : Naval Aviator Wings, Navy Distinguished Service Medal (w/two gold stars), Navy Cross Spanish Campaign Medal, Sampson Medal Mexican Service Medal, World War I Victory Medal (w/Atlantic Fleet campaign clasp, )American Defense Service Medal (w/Atlantic Device) American Campaign Medal, World War II Victory Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Grand Cross of the National Order of the Légion d’honneur (France), 1945Croix de guerre (France), 1944Commander of the Order of Vasco Nunez de Balboa (Panama), 1929,Officer of the Order of the Crown of Italy 1933, Knight of the Grand Cross of the Military Order of Italy 1948,Order of Merit, Grand Official (Brazil) 1943 ,Naval Order of Merit (Cuba) 1943, Estrella Abdon Calderon (Ecuador) 1943, Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath (United Kingdom) 194, Order of the Sacred Tripod (China) 1945,Grand Cross of the Order of George I (Greece) 1946, Grand Officer of the Order of the Crown (1948,)Croix de Guerre (Belgium) (1948), Order of Orange-Nassau (Netherlands) 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King, U.S. Navy Ernest J
    Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King, U.S. Navy Ernest J. King was born on 23 November 1878 in Lorain, OH. He attended the U.S. Naval Academy from 1897 until 1901, graduating fourth in his class. During his senior year at the Academy, he attained the rank of Midshipman Lieutenant Commander, the highest midshipman ranking at that time. While still at the Academy, he served on the USS San Francisco during the Spanish–American War. While at the Naval Academy, King met Martha Rankin Egerton, whom he married in a ceremony at the Naval Academy Chapel on 10 October 1905. They had six daughters, Claire, Elizabeth, Florence, Martha, Eleanor and Mildred; and then a son, Ernest Jr. After graduation, he served as a junior officer on the survey ship USS Eagle, the battleships USS Illinois, USS Alabama, and USS New Hampshire, and the cruiser USS Cincinnati. King returned to shore duty at Annapolis in 1912. He received his first command, the destroyer USS Terry in 1914, participating in the U.S. occupation of Veracruz. He then moved on to a more modern ship, USS Cassin. World War I: During the war he served on the staff of Vice Admiral Henry T. Mayo, the Commander in Chief, Atlantic Fleet. As such, he was a frequent visitor to the Royal Navy and occasionally saw action as an observer on board British ships. He was awarded the Navy Cross "for distinguished service in the line of his profession as assistant chief of staff of the Atlantic Fleet." After the war, King, now a captain, became head of the Naval Postgraduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Treadmill to Pearl Harbor: the Memoirs of Admiral James O
    Review Article On the Treadmill to Pearl Harbor: The Memoirs of Admiral James O. Richardson (USN Retired), As Told to Vice Admiral George C. Dyer (USN Retired). Washington DC: Naval Historical Division, Department of the Navy, 1973, 471 pages. Martin Merson On the Treadmill to Pearl Harbor: The Memoirs of Admiral James O. Richardson (USN Retired), As Told to Vice Admiral George C. Dyer (USN Retired), with an introduction by Vice Admiral Edwin B. Hooper, (USN Retired), Director of Naval History, is a fundamental book for anyone in- terested in ascertaining the truth concerning the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor, including the role of Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) and the Navy’s state of readiness. A review of the Richardson book appeared in Officer Review (The Military Order of the World Wars), Vol. 27, No. 6, January 1988, page 5.1 Although this book was completed in 1958, the publication date appearing in the book is 1973. To this reviewer’s knowledge there is no satisfactory explanation for the fifteen-year delay in making the book avail- able to the public. We have unofficial information that the delay may have been due to the fact that Harold Stark, Chief of Naval operations during the crucial early war years, did not die until 1972; the book is indeed highly critical of Admiral Stark. This writer has also been told that Admiral Arthur 1Martin Merson, “On the Treadmill to Pearl Harbor” Officer Review (The Military Order of the World Wars, 6 January 1988). 1 Radford, then serving as Chief of Naval Operations, insisted that Chapter XXII, entitled “Retrospect,” be included as a condition for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Chipman, Fanny S
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Program Foreign Service Spouse Series FANNY S. CHIPMAN Interviewed by: Hope Meyers Initial interview date: July 22, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Mrs. Chipman was born and raised in France. In 1935 she married United States Foreign Service Officer Norris Chipman, and accompanied him on his various assignments in Washington, DC and abroad Early years in France Born Fanny Bunand-Sevastos, 1905 in Asniéres, France Raised in France Bourdelle family Bourdelle’s :”La France” Early life in France French artists and writers Early education in France Alice Pike Barney and family Mademoiselle Laprévotte Anatole France Sir James Fraser Musée Bourdelle Career as artist (painter) Marcel Poncet Queen of Belgium Palais des Beaux Arts in Brussels The Dying Centaur Posing for sculpture Gift of the head of “France” sculpture Visit to the United States c1928 New York banking society Friend Irene Millet Chandler Bragdcon Georgia O’Keefe Theodor Gréppo 1 Return to Paris La Revue de la Femme Doris Stevens Malone Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact Mrs. O.H.P. Belmont Rambouillet Chateau Women’s Rights meeting Return to U.S. New Orleans carnival Angela Gregory Rodin Inter-American Commission of Women: Staff member The Hague Doris Stevens Malone National Women’s Party Dr. James Brown Scott Lobbying activities Senator Cooper Bernita Matthews Montevideo Conference Haiti Appointed Haiti delegate Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt opposition Protective legislation for women Commission financing Lima Conference Painting career Frau Conrad Husband Norris Chipman Accompanying Foreign Service Officer Norris Chipman 1936-1957 Husband’s background Marriage, 1935 Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sparks Letter to the Editor Sourcing Contextualizing Close Reading
    WWW. HISTORICALT HINKINGM ATTERS. ORG — SCOPES T RIAL Document A: Sparks Letter to the Editor Many citizens wrote letters to Tennessee’s newspapers in response to the Butler Act. Below is an excerpt from a letter written by a parent. Editor of the Nashville Tennessean: At the time the bill prohibiting the teaching of evolution in our public schools was passed by our legislature I could not see why the mothers in greater number were not conveying their appreciation to the members for this act of safeguarding their children from one of the destructive forces which . will destroy our civilization. I for one felt grateful for their standing for the right against all criticism. And grateful, too, that we have a Christian man for governor who will defend the Word of God against this so-called science. The Bible tells us that the gates of Hell shall not prevail against the church. Therefore we know there will always be standard-bearers for the cross of Christ. But in these times of materialism I am constrained to thank God deep down in my heart for . every . one whose voice is raised for the uplift of humanity and the coming of God’s kingdom. Mrs. Jesse Sparks Pope, Tennessee Source: Mrs. Jesse Sparks, letter to the editor, Nashville Tennessean, July 3, 1925. Sourcing 1. Why does Mrs. Sparks care about what is taught in schools? Contextualizing 2. To what does Mrs. Sparks refer when she says “these times of materialism”? Close Reading 3. Find all of the words that suggest the presence of a great danger.
    [Show full text]