Customer List
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold
SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD NICHOLAS W. HELDT (Bar No. 083601) 2 DIANE T. GORCZYCA (Bar No. 201203) One Embarcadero Center, 16th Floor 3 San Francisco, CA 94111-3628 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 4 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 5 Attorneys for Defendant RSR WHOLESALE GUNS, INC. 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) CASE NO. 303753 CALIFORNIA, et aI., ) 12 ) RSR WHOLESALE GUNS, INC.'S Plaintiffs, ) RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST 13 ) SET OF FORM INTERROGATORIES vs. ) 14 ) ARCADIA MACHINE & TOOL, et aI., ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 18 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 19 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant RSR WHOLESALE GUNS, INC. 20 SET NUMBER: ONE (1) 21 Defendant RSR WHOLESALE GUNS, INC. (hereinafter "RSR" or 22 "Defendant") responds to Plaintiffs' First Set of Form Interrogatories as follows: 23 FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 1.1: 24 State the name, ADDRESS, telephone number, and relationship to you of each 25 PERSON who prepared or assisted in the preparation of the responses to these interrogatories. 26 (Do not identify anyone who simply typed or reproduced the response.) SEDGWICK. 27 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1.1: DETERT. MORAN & ARNOLD 28 The responses to these interrogatories were prepared by outside counsel to One Embarcadero Center Sixteenth Floor San F..... ci.sco, California 94111.,'!628 - 1 - TeL 415. 781 . 7900 PRO-SF/51086 RSR WHOLESALE GUNS, INC.'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF FORM INTERROGATORiES RSR, Nicholas W. Heldt and Diane T. Gorczyca of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, based 2 on infonnation provided by RSR's Senior Vice President and in-house legal counsel, Michael 3 Saporito. -
BOMA Bulletin Marble West Mcmillan Electric Co
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2006 www.bomasf.org B OMA S a n F r a n c i s c o a d v a n c e s t h e c o m m e r c i a l r e a l e s t a t e i n d u s t r y t h r o u g h a d v o c a c y , p r o f e s s i o n a l d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d i n f o r m a t i o n e x c h a n g e Support our Associate Members: Buying BOMA Benefits Us All By Kathy Mattes, CPM, CCIM, Flynn Properties Inc. On the Inside good portion of our membership and involved with the local BOMAs there, has spent the past few months as well. If I’m doing business elsewhere working on their 2007 budgets. and don’t know the market but need some ELMER JOHNSON RECAP This process, arduous as it may seem, assistance, I know where to turn. And • •• 4 •• • reminds us where we spend our valuable that’s comforting. Adollars, and what expenditures give us the best return on investment. As a Principal Our Associate members are a great UILDING OUR 2006 B T BOMA member, I know the value received resource to BOMA San Francisco. • •• 6 •• • for my dues investment. I know that, as a Associate members contribute not only result of BOMA’s advocacy efforts, my dues and sponsorship support to our dues of approximately $0.01638 activities; they also actively CALENDAR per square foot per year saves serve on many committees that • •• 7 •• • 1.54 per square foot per year in do the work of our association. -
Mckesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation 99-CV-20743-US District
US District Court Civil Docket as of February 8, 2013 Retrieved from the court on February 11, 2013 U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:99-cv-20743-RMW Aronson, et al v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al Date Filed: 04/28/1999 Assigned to: Judge Ronald M. Whyte Date Terminated: 03/26/2008 Referred to: Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull Jury Demand: Both Demand: $0 Nature of Suit: 850 Case in other court: Ninth Circuit, 06-15987 Securities/Commodities Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Andrew Aronson represented by D. Brian Hufford on behalf of himself and all others Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & similarly situated Gross LLP 100 Park Ave 26th Flr New York, NY 10017-5516 (212) 661-1100 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel L. Berger Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann 1285 Avenue of the Americas 33rd Flr New York, NY 10019 (212) 554-1400 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gerald J. Rodos Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey W. Golan Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joseph J. Tabacco , Jr. Berman DeValerio One California Street Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-3200 Fax: 415-433-6382 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Leonard Barrack Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Max W. -
March 2020 Report Corporations Code Section 301.3 Report Methodology
ALEX PADILLA SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE March 2020 Report Corporations Code Section 301.3 Report Methodology The July 2019 Report and March 2020 Report have been created by using publicly available information provided in annual California and annual federal filings by corporations, as well as information provided by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), NYSE American (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange or AMEX and more recently as NYSE MKT), National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ), and other sources available on the internet, including company websites. The Secretary of State posted a benchmark report on July 1, 2019, listing all publicly held corporations that stated a principal executive office in California on the annual report filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Form 10-K) during the 6-month period of January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019. The July 2019 Report also listed all publicly traded corporations identified through the Publicly Traded Disclosure Search on the Secretary of State’s website that reported having at least one female director on their annual Corporate Disclosure Statement filings with the Secretary of State. The March 2020 Report has been created by combining information in the July 2019 Report with data for the additional 6-month period of July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. The information and statistics provided in the reports were generated by a search of the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) for corporations listing a principal executive office in California on their SEC Form 10-K filing. -
SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street. -
November 23, 2004 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal
November 23, 2004 By ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Written Ex Parte Presentation, Unbundled Access to Network Elements; Review ofthe Section 251 Unbundling Obligations ofIncumbent Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 04-313, CC Docket No. 01-338 Dear Ms. Dortch: On November 16, 2004, Verizon filed an ex parte letter in this docket, attaching a recent filing by MCI in a California state regulatory proceeding. As Verizon expressly acknowledges, MCI's pleading was submitted in response to a request by the California Public Utilities Commission "for comment on whether it should revise traditional retail regulation of ILECs.,,1 Verizon contends that this filing amounts to an admission by MCI "that the arguments it advanced in this proceeding no longer are valid,,2 - a claim that misstates the facts and ignores the context in which the California pleading was filed. Even a cursory review of the MCI submission shows that MCI did not contradict the facts or contentions that it has advanced in this proceeding concerning the state of intermodal competition. More fundamentally, the California proceeding and this Commission's pending Triennial Remand proceeding involve very different issues. The California Public Utilities Commission is examining in two concurrent proceedings the retail regulatory framework applicable to the state's foremost ILECs, and the application of intrastate switched access charges. In the instant proceeding, the FCC is charged with examining impairment in the absence ofthe availability of Letter from Dee May, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, WC Docket No. -
Geographical Names and Sustainable Tourism
No. 59 NOVEMBERNo. 59 NOVEMBER 2020 2020 Geographical Names and Sustainable Tourism Socio- Institutional cultural Sustainable Tourism Economic Environmental Table of Contents The Information Bulletin of the United Nations MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRPERSON ............................................... 3 Group of Experts on Geographical Names (formerly Reconsidérer notre mobilité ......................................................... 3 UNGEGN Newsletter) is issued twice a year by the Secretariat of the Group of Experts. The Secretariat Reconsider our mobility ............................................................... 4 is served by the Statistics Division (UNSD), MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARIAT ................................................. 5 Department for Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Secretariat of the United Nations. Contributions “Geographical names and sustainable tourism ............................ 5 and reports received from the Experts of the Group, IN MEMORIAM ................................................................................ 7 its Linguistic/Geographical Divisions and its Working Groups are reviewed and edited jointly by the Danutė Janė Mardosienė (1947-2020) ........................................ 7 Secretariat and the UNGEGN Working Group on SPECIAL FEATURE: GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES AND SUSTAINABLE Publicity and Funding. Contributions for the TOURISM ......................................................................................... 9 Information Bulletin can only be considered when they are made -
Item 9A Informational Presentation on SWL 351 Development Criteria
MEMORANDUM May 22, 2008 TO: MEMBERS, PORT COMMISSION Hon. Kimberly Brandon, President Hon. Rodney Fong Vice President Hon. Ann Lazarus Hon. Michael Hardeman Hon. Stephanie Shakofsky FROM: Monique A. Moyer Executive Director SUBJECT: Informational Presentation on Development Criteria for SWL 351 (The Embarcadero at Washington Street) DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION: Discussion Item, No Action Requested EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Seawall Lot 351 (“SWL 351”) is one of the development opportunities in San Francisco created by removal of the Embarcadero Freeway after the 1989 earthquake. The parcel is a nearly triangular site with a 358-foot frontage along The Embarcadero Roadway with a mere 26-foot frontage on Washington Street. (See Exhibit A, Site Map.) In the context of San Francisco, this 27,937 square foot lot has potential for effective development. At its December 11, 2007 meeting, the Port Commission received an informational presentation by San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC (“SFWP”) of its proposed 8 Washington project, a mixed-use condominium development.1 The proposed project site, as currently conceived, includes a privately owned 2.5 acre property within the Golden Gateway area and the adjacent Port-owned SWL 351 located at Washington Street and The Embarcadero. This unsolicited development proposal has raised questions about the Port’s long-term land use and development plans for SWL 351. The Port’s Waterfront Land Use Plan (“Waterfront Plan”) identifies development parameters and acceptable land uses for SWL 351 and also notes the 1 The Port has not responded to SFWP’s proposal; rather the Port is engaging in a public process before considering any land transaction involving SWL 351. -
Dear Secretary Salazar: I Strongly
Dear Secretary Salazar: I strongly oppose the Bush administration's illegal and illogical regulations under Section 4(d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which reduce protections to polar bears and create an exemption for greenhouse gas emissions. I request that you revoke these regulations immediately, within the 60-day window provided by Congress for their removal. The Endangered Species Act has a proven track record of success at reducing all threats to species, and it makes absolutely no sense, scientifically or legally, to exempt greenhouse gas emissions -- the number-one threat to the polar bear -- from this successful system. I urge you to take this critically important step in restoring scientific integrity at the Department of Interior by rescinding both of Bush's illegal regulations reducing protections to polar bears. Sarah Bergman, Tucson, AZ James Shannon, Fairfield Bay, AR Keri Dixon, Tucson, AZ Ben Blanding, Lynnwood, WA Bill Haskins, Sacramento, CA Sher Surratt, Middleburg Hts, OH Kassie Siegel, Joshua Tree, CA Sigrid Schraube, Schoeneck Susan Arnot, San Francisco, CA Stephanie Mitchell, Los Angeles, CA Sarah Taylor, NY, NY Simona Bixler, Apo Ae, AE Stephan Flint, Moscow, ID Steve Fardys, Los Angeles, CA Shelbi Kepler, Temecula, CA Kim Crawford, NJ Mary Trujillo, Alhambra, CA Diane Jarosy, Letchworth Garden City,Herts Shari Carpenter, Fallbrook, CA Sheila Kilpatrick, Virginia Beach, VA Kierã¡N Suckling, Tucson, AZ Steve Atkins, Bath Sharon Fleisher, Huntington Station, NY Hans Morgenstern, Miami, FL Shawn Alma, -
2013-00985C3340.Pdf
SERVICE LIST JCCP 4765 ADDRESS PARTY Trenton H. Norris ABACO Partners LLC; Commonwealth Sarah Esmaili Soap & Toiletries, Inc.; E.T. Browne Arnold & Porter LLP Drug Company, Inc.; Home & Body Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor Company, Inc.; Method Products, Inc. San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] Kevin C. Mayer Added Extras LLC Crowell & Moring LLP 515 S. Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [email protected] John E. Dittoe Advanced Healthcare Distributors, Reed Smith LLP L.L.C.; CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Paul H. Burleigh Alberto-Culver Company; TIGI Linea LeclairRyan, LLP Corp. 725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 350 Los Angeles, CA 90017 [email protected] Bruce Nye Albertson’s, LLC; Raani Corporation; Barbara Adams SUPERVALU, Inc. Adams Nye Becht LLP 222 Kearny Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 [email protected] [email protected] Jason L. Weisberg Archipelago, Inc. Roxborough Pomerance Nye & Adreani 5820 Canoga Avenue, Suite 250 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 [email protected] Sophia B. Belloli Aspire Brands; Bonne Bell, LLC Michael Van Zandt Hanson Bridgett LLP 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Richard E. Haskin Awesome Products, Inc. Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet Wittbrodt LLP 1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 [email protected] Robert A. Randick Barbera Studio, Inc. Randick O’Dea & Tooliatos, LLP 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 225 -
SAN FRANCISCO) Z
1 Irving Sulmeyer (CA Bar No. 22910) Victor A. Sahn (CA Bar No. 97299) 2 Frank V. Zerunyan (CA Bar No. 140191) SULMEYER, KUPETZ, BAUMANN & ROTHMAN 3 A Professional Corporation 300 South Grand Avenue, 14th Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 626-2311 5 Facsimile: (213) 629-4520 6 Attorneys for Certain California Counties with Claims against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) z 04 11 00 U') 12 In re CASE NO. 01-30923 DM 11 z 13 Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Chapter (LLI Z oN >-I u ,,-NCD< 14 Debtor. M W CD 15 Federal I.D. No. 94-0742640 16 0UCOC' >- C -LJ l J 17 C', 18 19 20 21 22 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL RE 23 (1) RULE 2019 STATEMENT AND (2) REQUEST FOR SPECIAL NOTICE 24 25 I am employed in the City and County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the 26 age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 300 South 27 Grand Avenue, 14 th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. 28 [IS\AP1 D\41117R 1 5/141401 (3:07 PMVI--611~~1~, ~ Jr PROOF OF SERVICE of documents for 1 I am readily familiar with the practice for collection and processing & Rothman, a 2 mailing with the United States Postal Service of Sulmeyer, Kupetz, Baumann with the United 3 Professional Corporation, and that practice is that the documents are deposited in the 4 States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid the same day as the day of collection 5 ordinary course of business. -
The Evolution of the Financial Services Industry and Its Impact on U.S
THOUGHT LEADERSHIP SERIES THE EVOLUTION OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY AND ITS IMPACT ON U.S. OFFICE SPACE June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW OF U.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY I PAGE: 4 OVERVIEW OF OFFICE MARKET CONDITIONS IN 11 MAJOR FINANCIAL CENTERS PAGE: 8 A. ATLANTA, GA PAGE: 8 B. BOSTON, MA PAGE: 10 C. CHARLOTTE, NC PAGE: 12 D. CHICAGO, IL PAGE: 14 E. DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TX II PAGE: 16 F. DENVER, CO PAGE: 18 G. MANHATTAN, NY PAGE: 20 H. ORANGE COUNTY, CA PAGE: 22 I. SAN FRANCISCO, CA PAGE: 24 J. WASHINGTON, DC PAGE: 26 K. WILMINGTON, DE PAGE: 28 MARKET SUMMARY AND ACTION STEPS III PAGE: 30 KEY FINDINGS The financial services sector has adapted its office-space usage in ways that are consistent with many office-using industries. However, its relationship to real estate has changed as a result of its role within the broader economy. In particular, four major causes have spurred a reduction in gross leasing activity by financial services firms: increased government regulation following the Great Recession of 2007-2009, cost reduction, efficient space utilization, and the emergence of the financial technology (fintech) sector. While demand for office space among financial services tenants has edged down recently overall, industry demand is inconsistent among major metros. For example, leasing increased for financial services tenants in San Francisco from 10% of all leasing activity in 2015 to 20% in 2016, while leasing among tenants in New York City declined from 32% to 20% over the same time period. Leasing trends within the financial services industry correlate with: the types of institutions involved, environments with policies and incentives that are conducive to doing business, the scale of operations and access to a highly-skilled talent pool, a shift from some urban to suburban locations, and a desire for new construction.