DOCSLIB.ORG

Sea Level Rise Adaptation Primer a Toolkit to Build Adaptive Capacity on Canada’S South Coasts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sea Level Rise Adaptation Primer a Toolkit to Build Adaptive Capacity on Canada’S South Coasts SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PRIMER A TOOLKIT TO BUILD ADAPTIVE CAPACITY ON CANADA’S SOUTH COASTS Prepared by The Arlington Group Planning + Architecture Inc. EBA, a Tetra Tech Company Prepared for DE Jardine Consulting British Columbia Ministry of Environment Sustainability Solutions Group Fall 2013 Sustainability Solutions De Jardine Group Groupe de Consulting Solutions pour un Développement Durable This Primer is a resource for coastal management authorities (mainly local governments) to help them identify and evaluate options for adapting to the impacts of sea level rise and associated hazards. The Primer is intended to be relevant for southern coastal regions across Canada with application to British Columbia, Quebec, and the Atlantic region. Acknowledgements This project was made possible with financial support from Natural Resources Canada’s Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Program, the Province of British Columbia, the Atlantic Climate Adaptation Solutions Association and the Adaptation to Climate Change Team at Simon Fraser University. Atlantic Climate Adaptation Solutions Association Solutions d’adaptation aux changements climatiques pour l’Atlantique THINKING OF THE WORLD ACT (Adaptation to Climate Change Team) Cover photos: Photo 1 (top): Stock photo Photo 2 (bottom far left): Dune protection consisting of sand fence with spruce boughs, Souris Causeway, P.E.I. (Photo: D. Jardine) Photo 3 (bottom middle left): 18th century mooring ring at Fortress of Louisbourg (Photo: Ambrose MacNeil) Photo 4 (bottom middle right): West Vancouver, B.C. Seawall Photo 4 (bottom middle right): Fraser River Park Vancouver, B.C. (Photo: Hay & Company Consultants Inc.) Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................... 6 Introduction ...................................................................................... 7 Primer Focus Area ................................................................................. 13 Framework for Decision-Making ................................................................... 21 Adaptation Tools .................................................................................. 28 Planning Tools ................................................................................ 30 1. Objectives and Policies ................................................................. 30 2. Coastal Hazard Mapping ................................................................ 32 3. Risk Management ...................................................................... 36 4. Emergency Planning and Preparedness ................................................. 39 Regulatory Tools .............................................................................. 41 1. Regulation of Land Use ................................................................. 41 2. Subdivision Regulation ................................................................. 44 3. Development Permit ................................................................... 46 4. Building Regulation .................................................................... 47 Land Use Change or Restriction Tools .......................................................... 50 1. Land Acquisition ....................................................................... 50 2. Transfer of Development Potential ...................................................... 51 3. Easements and Covenants .............................................................. 53 4. Land Trusts ............................................................................. 55 5. Foreshore Tenure ....................................................................... 57 Structural (Flood Protection Works) ............................................................ 61 1. Scour Protection ........................................................................ 61 2. Structural Elevation ..................................................................... 62 3. Dikes ................................................................................... 64 4. Other Hard Protection .................................................................. 68 5. Wet Floodproofing ..................................................................... 71 Non-Structural (Soft Armouring). 73 1. Coastal Wetland Creation or Restoration ................................................. 73 2. Dune Building or Rehabilitation ......................................................... 75 3. Beach Nourishment .................................................................... 77 Non-Local Government Adaption Tools ............................................................ 85 The Cost of Sea Level Rise and Adaptation ......................................................... 94 Appendix A – Glossary ............................................................................ 98 Appendix B – Summary of Primer Tools ............................................................ 102 Appendix C – Legislative Matrices ................................................................. 109 Appendix D – Atlantic Canada Municipal Polices and Bylaws ........................................ 114 Appendix E – Annotated Bibliography ............................................................. 121 Bibliography ...................................................................................... 142 1 2 Executive Summary Climate change is here, increasing global loss of life and property damage as weather patterns change. We now know that with climate change comes rising seas – and that this sea level rise will dramatically affect Canada’s southern coastal communities.1 These communities will require resilience and adaptive capacity to ensure their long-term sustainability. Coastal hazards associated with sea level rise include: • Coastal inundation and reduced drainage capacity; • Coastal erosion; • Changes to coastal habitats and loss of wetlands such as salt marshes; • Reduction in coastal sea ice; and • More frequent and intense storms, storm surge and wave action. This Primer provides an introduction to past and future sea level, an overview of four different adaptation strategies, a recommended framework for decision making and finally a total of 21 adaptation tools to support local adaptation action. The B.C. Ministry of the Environment commissioned the preparation of this Sea Level Rise Adaptation Primer for Canada’s Atlantic and Pacific coasts. Although this Primer was prepared in B.C., legislative provisions, policies and local government applications discussed in this Primer include B.C., southern Quebec and the Atlantic coasts of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador. Coastal communities along Hudson Bay and in the Arctic face a different set of vulnerabilities and were not considered within the context of this research. Protect Accomodate Retreat Avoid Adaptation strategies to sea level rise can be grouped as follows: Protect is a reactive strategy to protect people, property and infrastructure from sea level rise and is typically the first response considered. Protecting the coastline through structural mechanisms such as dikes, seawalls and groynes has been the traditional approach to dealing with sea level rise in many parts of the world. With increasing sea level rise and coastal vulnerability, this strategy may be prohibitively expensive and have limited long-term effectiveness in highly vulnerable locations. Accommodate is an adaptive strategy that allows continued occupation of coastal areas while changes are made to human activities and/or infrastructure to adapt to sea level rise. Accommodation can also involve retrofitting a building or making it more resilient to the consequences of sea level rise. Other accommodation measures may include liability reduction, such as a covenant indemnifying governments from the consequences of coastal hazards regardless of protection works undertaken. 1 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007). 3 Retreat or Managed Retreat refers to any strategic decision to withdraw, relocate or abandon private or public assets at risk due to sea level rise and associated coastal hazards. Retreat is an adaptive strategy to limit the use of structural protection, discourage development in areas subject to sea level rise, and plan for the eventual relocation of buildings and infrastructure to areas with no risk or lesser risk. Avoid involves ensuring new development does not take place in areas subject to coastal hazards associated with sea level rise or where the risk is low at present but will increase over time. This may involve identifying future “no build” areas within local government planning documents. A wide range of planning tools may be involved, leading to a decision to avoid development in areas subject to moderate to high risk. An avoid strategy may involve land acquisition or the transfer of development potential to areas of lower risk. These adaptation strategies are not mutually exclusive. Two or more strategies may be applied in different geographic areas by the same local government. The most appropriate strategy for a geographic area may also change over time. To implement these strategies, a wide range of adaptation tools are available. Adaptation tools included in this Primer tools should be considered in the context of information gathering, public education
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management of Coastal Erosion by Creating Large-Scale and Small-Scale Sediment Cells
    COASTAL EROSION CONTROL BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF SEDIMENT CELLS by L. C. van Rijn, www.leovanrijn-sediment.com, March 2013 1. Introduction Nearly all coastal states have to deal with the problem of coastal erosion. Coastal erosion and accretion has always existed and these processes have contributed to the shaping of the present coastlines. However, coastal erosion now is largely intensified due to human activities. Presently, the total coastal area (including houses and buildings) lost in Europe due to marine erosion is estimated to be about 15 km2 per year. The annual cost of mitigation measures is estimated to be about 3 billion euros per year (EUROSION Study, European Commission, 2004), which is not acceptable. Although engineering projects are aimed at solving the erosion problems, it has long been known that these projects can also contribute to creating problems at other nearby locations (side effects). Dramatic examples of side effects are presented by Douglas et al. (The amount of sand removed from America’s beaches by engineering works, Coastal Sediments, 2003), who state that about 1 billion m3 (109 m3) of sand are removed from the beaches of America by engineering works during the past century. The EUROSION study (2004) recommends to deal with coastal erosion by restoring the overall sediment balance on the scale of coastal cells, which are defined as coastal compartments containing the complete cycle of erosion, deposition, sediment sources and sinks and the transport paths involved. Each cell should have sufficient sediment reservoirs (sources of sediment) in the form of buffer zones between the land and the sea and sediment stocks in the nearshore and offshore coastal zones to compensate by natural or artificial processes (nourishment) for sea level rise effects and human-induced erosional effects leading to an overall favourable sediment status.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Mining: the Basics
    A fact sheet from June 2018 NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration and Research Deep-sea Mining: The Basics Overview The deepest parts of the world’s ocean feature ecosystems found nowhere else on Earth. They provide habitat for multitudes of species, many yet to be named. These vast, lightless regions also possess deposits of valuable minerals in rich concentrations. Deep-sea extraction technologies may soon develop to the point where exploration of seabed minerals can give way to active exploitation. The International Seabed Authority (ISA) is charged with formulating and enforcing rules for all seabed mining that takes place in waters beyond national jurisdictions. These rules are now under development. Environmental regulations, liability and financial rules, and oversight and enforcement protocols all must be written and approved within three to five years. Figure 1 Types of Deep-sea Mining Production support vessel Return pipe Riser pipe Cobalt Seafloor massive Polymetallic crusts sulfides nodules Subsurface plumes 800-2,500 from return water meters deep Deposition 1,000-4,000 meters deep 4,000-6,500 meters deep Cobalt-rich Localized plumes Seabed pump Ferromanganeseferromanganese from cutting crusts Seafloor production tool Nodule deposit Massive sulfide deposit Sediment Source: New Zealand Environment Guide © 2018 The Pew Charitable Trusts 2 The legal foundations • The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Also known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, UNCLOS is the constitutional document governing mineral exploitation on the roughly 60 percent of the world seabed that lies beyond national jurisdictions. UNCLOS took effect in 1994 upon passage of key enabling amendments designed to spur commercial mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Canada’S Landscapes Have a Wealth of Stories to Tell
    hallowed grounConserving Canada’s natural historyd annual report 2017 Canada’s landscapes have a wealth of stories to tell. Stories of history and culture. Stories of sacred traditions and pioneering spirits. From coast to coast to coast, the nation’s land and water have inspired countless tales of exploration and discovery, progress and change. Since 1938, Ducks Unlimited Canada has been helping conserve the hallowed ground where history is made. It’s a responsibility we’re committed to – now and always. Happy 150th anniversary, Canada. Ducks Unlimited Canada (DUC) is proud to be part of a nation committed to conserving the iconic landscapes of the true north strong and free. It’s in our nature. From shallow wetlands to dense forests, grasslands, salt marshes and coastal estuaries,Canada’s wetlands are part of an environmental legacy DUC is creating thanks to the support of people from across the country. But these wetlands are more than just a backdrop. They are essential elements of our lives. Water. Wildlife. Recreation. Protection against extreme weather and support for healthy communities. Wetlands are engrained in Canada’s natural history. DUC has been working for 79 of Canada’s 150 confederated years. Partnerships with peoples from all cultures and backgrounds are the roots of our success. Respect for the unique ways that wetlands and wildlife connect us all is what drives our ongoing quest for a better, healthier world. Together, we’re continuing to define what it means to be Canadian – and what it means to be a conservationist. Great Bear Lake wetland Great Bear Lake is a part of the Yamoria legends — ancient Dene stories about giant heroes, animals and living landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration
    1 The Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration 2 of Soft Cliff Coastlines 3 4 Sally Brown1*, Max Barton1, Robert J Nicholls1 5 6 1. Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, 7 University Road, Highfield, Southampton, UK. S017 1BJ. 8 9 * Sally Brown ([email protected], Telephone: +44(0)2380 594796). 10 11 Abstract: Building defences, such as groynes, on eroding soft cliff coastlines alters the 12 sediment budget, changing the shoreline configuration adjacent to defences. On the 13 down-drift side, the coastline is set-back. This is often believed to be caused by increased 14 erosion via the ‘terminal groyne effect’, resulting in rapid land loss. This paper examines 15 whether the terminal groyne effect always occurs down-drift post defence construction 16 (i.e. whether or not the retreat rate increases down-drift) through case study analysis. 17 18 Nine cases were analysed at Holderness and Christchurch Bay, England. Seven out of 19 nine sites experienced an increase in down-drift retreat rates. For the two remaining sites, 20 retreat rates remained constant after construction, probably as a sediment deficit already 21 existed prior to construction or as sediment movement was restricted further down-drift. 22 For these two sites, a set-back still evolved, leading to the erroneous perception that a 23 terminal groyne effect had developed. Additionally, seven of the nine sites developed a 24 set back up-drift of the initial groyne, leading to the defended sections of coast acting as 1 25 a hard headland, inhabiting long-shore drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping
    Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping Coastal Notations, Acronyms, and Glossary of Terms May 2016 Requirements for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Program are specified separately by statute, regulation, or FEMA policy (primarily the Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping). This document provides guidance to support the requirements and recommends approaches for effective and efficient implementation. Alternate approaches that comply with all requirements are acceptable. For more information, please visit the FEMA Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping webpage (www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and- mapping). Copies of the Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping policy, related guidance, technical references, and other information about the guidelines and standards development process are all available here. You can also search directly by document title at www.fema.gov/library. Coastal Notation, Acronyms, and Glossary of Terms May 2016 Guidance Document 66 Page i Document History Affected Section or Date Description Subsection Initial version of new transformed guidance. The content was derived from the Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners, Procedure Memoranda, First Publication May 2016 and/or Operating Guidance documents. It has been reorganized and is being published separately from the standards. Coastal Notation, Acronyms, and Glossary of Terms May 2016 Guidance Document 66
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Beausejour National Historic Park Aulac, New Brunswick Canada
    Fort Beausejour National Historic Park Aulac, New Brunswick Canada Issued under the authority of the HONOURABLE ARTHUR LAING, P.C., M.P., B.S.A. Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Original Earthen Bastion of French Period Fort Beausejour National Historic Park Aulac, New Brunswick At the middle of the 18th century the dividing line between French and British influence in Acadia lay along the Missaguash River, one of the four rivers that drain the southern slope of the Isthmus of Chignecto. In 1710 New England militiamen and British regulars had captured the French Port Royal, thus in one engagement effecting the conquest of the Nova Scotia main- land. The Treaty of Utrecht, concluded three years later, formally transferred Acadia to Great Britain. But what was Acadia? The British hopefully believed parts of what is now New Brunswick were included. The French, confident that they would soon win back the Nova Scotia mainland, could not consider such a broad definition of the geographical limits of Acadia. They were determined to hold as much ground as they could. Time seemed to be in their favor. Against the weak and ill-disciplined garrison at Annapolis Royal and the few detachments occupying isolated posts in the peninsula, the French could send Indian raiding parties. While the British struggled against the harassments of the Indians, the population of Acadia—over­ whelmingly French—could be provoked to at least passive resistance against their alien conquerors. French power preserved at the Fortress of Louisbourg on Cape Breton Island and at the settlements of New France along the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabed Mapping: a Brief History from Meaningful Words
    geosciences Review Seabed Mapping: A Brief History from Meaningful Words Pedro Smith Menandro and Alex Cardoso Bastos * Marine Geosciences Lab (Labogeo), Departmento Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória-ES 29075-910, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 16 July 2020 Abstract: Over the last few centuries, mapping the ocean seabed has been a major challenge for marine geoscientists. Knowledge of seabed bathymetry and morphology has significantly impacted our understanding of our planet dynamics. The history and scientific trends of seabed mapping can be assessed by data mining prior studies. Here, we have mined the scientific literature using the keyword “seabed mapping” to investigate and provide the evolution of mapping methods and emphasize the main trends and challenges over the last 90 years. An increase in related scientific production was observed in the beginning of the 1970s, together with an increased interest in new mapping technologies. The last two decades have revealed major shift in ocean mapping. Besides the range of applications for seabed mapping, terms like habitat mapping and concepts of seabed classification and backscatter began to appear. This follows the trend of investments in research, science, and technology but is mainly related to national and international demands regarding defining that country’s exclusive economic zone, the interest in marine mineral and renewable energy resources, the need for spatial planning, and the scientific challenge of understanding climate variability. The future of seabed mapping brings high expectations, considering that this is one of the main research and development themes for the United Nations Decade of the Oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Model of Groynes on Shingle Beaches
    HR Wallingford Mathematical Model of Groynes on Shingle Beaches A H Brampton BSc PhD D G Goldberg BA Report SR 276 November 1991 Address:Hydraulics Research Ltd, wallingford,oxfordshire oxl0 gBA,United Kingdom. Telephone:0491 35381 Intemarional + 44 49135381 relex: g4gsszHRSwALG. Facstunile:049132233Intemarional + M 49132233 Registeredin EngtandNo. 1622174 This report describes an investigation carried out by HR Wallingford under contract CSA 1437, 'rMathematical- Model of Groynes on Shingle Beaches", funded by the Ministry of Agri-culture, Fisheries and Food. The departmental nominated. officer for this contract was Mr A J Allison. The company's nominated. project officer was Dr S W Huntington. This report is published on behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, but the opinions e>rpressed are not necessarily those of the Ministry. @ Crown Copyright 1991 Published by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Mathematical model of groSmes on shingle beaches A H Brampton BSc PhD D G Goldberg BA Report SR 276 November 1991 ABSTRACT This report describes the development of a mathematical model of a shingle beach with gro5mes. The development of the beach plan shape is calculated given infornation on its initial position and information on wave conditions just offshore. Different groyne profiles and spacings can be specified, so that alternative gro5me systems can be investigated. Ttre model includes a method for dealing with varying water levels as the result of tidal rise and fall. CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION I 2. SCOPEOF THE UODEL 3 2.t Model resolution and input conditions 3 2.2 Sediment transport mechanisms 6 2.3 Vertical distribution of sediment transport q 2.4 Wave transformation modelling L0 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Intern Report
    Insights from abyssal lebensspuren Jennifer Durden, University of Southampton, UK Mentors: Ken Smith, Jr., Christine Huffard, Katherine Dunlop Summer 2014 Keywords: lebensspuren, traces, abyss, megafauna, deposit-feeding, benthos, sediment ABSTRACT The seasonal input of food to the abyss impacts the benthic community, and changes to that temporal cycle, through changes to the climate and surface ocean conditions impact the benthic assemblage. Most of the benthic fauna are deposit feeders, and many leave traces (‘lebensspuren’) of their activity in the sediment. These traces provide an avenue for examining the temporal variations in the activity of these animals, with insights into the usage of food inputs to the system. Traces of a variety of functions were identified in photographs captured in 2011 and 2012 from Station M, a soft-sedimented abyssal site in the northeast Pacific. Lebensspuren creation, holothurian tracking, and lebensspuren duration were estimated from hourly time-lapse images, while trace densities, diversity and seabed coverage were assessed from photographs captured with a seabed- transiting vehicle. The creation rates and duration of traces on the seabed appeared to vary over time, and may have been related to food supply, as may tracking rates of holothurians. The density, diversity and seabed coverage by lebensspuren of different types varied with food supply, with different lag times for POC flux and salp coverage. These are interpreted to be due to selectivity of 1 deposit feeders, and different response times between trace creators. These variations shed light on the usage of food inputs to the abyss. INTRODUCTION Deep-sea benthic communities rely on a seasonal food supply of detritus from the surface ocean (Billett et al., 1983, Rice et al., 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Stabilisation
    Section 5 SHORELINE STABILISATION 5.1 Overview of Options Options for handling beach erosion along the western segment of Shelley Beach include: • Do Nothing – which implies letting nature take its course; • Beach Nourishment – place or pump sand on the beach to restore a beach; • Wave Dissipating Seawall – construct a wave dissipating seawall in front of or in lieu of the vertical wall so that wave energy is absorbed and complete protection is provided to the boatsheds and bathing boxes behind the wall for a 50 year planning period; • Groyne – construct a groyne, somewhere to the east of Campbells Road to prevent sand from the western part of Shelley Beach being lost to the eastern part of Shelley Beach; • Offshore Breakwater – construct a breakwater parallel to the shoreline and seaward of the existing jetties to dissipate wave energy before it reaches the beach; and • Combinations of the above. 5.2 Do Nothing There is no reason to believe that the erosion process that has occurred over at least the last 50 years, at the western end of Shelley Beach, will diminish. If the water depth over the nearshore bank has deepened, as it appears visually from aerial photographs, the wave heights and erosive forces may in fact increase. Therefore “Do Nothing” implies that erosion will continue, more structures will be threatened and ultimately damaged, and the timber vertical wall become undermined and fail, exposing the structures behind the wall to wave forces. The cliffs behind the wall will be subjected to wave forces and will be undermined if they are not founded on solid rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Worksheets on Climate Change: Sea Level Rise
    EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEETS ON CLIMATE CHANGE Sea level rise Consequences for coastal and lowland areas: Bangladesh and the Netherlands Sea level rise – Consequences for coastal and lowland areas: Bangladesh and the Netherlands © Germanwatch 2014 Sea level rise Consequences for coastal and lowland areas: Bangladesh and the Netherlands As a consequence of the anthropogenic greenhouse effect A comparison of the two countries, the Netherlands and the scientific community predicts an increase in average Bangladesh, both of which are potentially very much jeop- global temperature and resulting sea level rise. Heated ardised by sea level rise, clearly illustrates the likely im- water, however, expands only slowly because of the heat pacts for humans and the environment, but also shows transfer from the atmosphere to the sea. For this reason, how different the capacities of individual countries are the sea responds to climate change like a slow-to-react concerning their ability to adapt and to protect them- monster – slow but persistent. In the 20th century the selves from the consequences. Bangladesh, one of the sea level already rose by an average of 12 to 22 cm. The poorest and at the same time most densely populated Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) con- countries in the world, is also one of the countries which cludes that, as a result of climate change, by 2100 the rise will be most affected by the expected sea level rise. in sea levels could increase worldwide by up to almost 1 metre compared to the mean sea level in the years Flooding has already caused damage up to 100 km inland 1986–2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure 4117, Tide 5217, Wave and Tide 5218
    TD 302 OPERATING MANUAL PRESSURE SENSOR 4117/4117R TIDE SENSOR 5217/5217R WAVE & TIDE SENSOR 5217/5217R January 2014 PRESSURE SENSOR 4117/4117R TIDE SENSOR 5217/5217R WAVE AND TIDE SENSOR 5218/5218R Page 2 Aanderaa Data Instruments AS – TD302 1st Edition 30 June 2013 Preliminary 2nd Edition 05 September 2003 New version including general updates in text. Rebranded, Frame Work 3 update, please refer Product change notification AADI Document ID:DA-50009-01, Date: 09 December 2011 (ref Appendix 6 ). 3rd Edition 14 January 2014 New property “Installation Depth” added for Tide sensors, effective version 8.1.1 © Copyright: Aanderaa Data Instruments AS January 2014 - TD 302 Operating Manual for Pressure 4117/4117R Tide 5217/5217R, Wave & Tide 5218/5218R Page 3 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and scope ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Document overview.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Applicable documents .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]