DOCSLIB.ORG

Archival Documentation, Historical Perception, and the No Gun Ri Massacre in the Korean War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RECORDS AND THE UNDERSTANDING OF VIOLENT EVENTS: ARCHIVAL DOCUMENTATION, HISTORICAL PERCEPTION, AND THE NO GUN RI MASSACRE IN THE KOREAN WAR by Donghee Sinn B.A., Chung-Ang University, 1993 M.A., Chung-Ang University, 1996 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Department of Library and Information Science School of Information Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE SCHOOL OF INFORMATION SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Donghee Sinn It was defended on July 9, 2007 and approved by Richard J. Cox, Ph.D., DLIS, Advisor Karen F. Gracy, Ph.D., DLIS Ellen G. Detlefsen, Ph.D., DLIS Jeannette A. Bastian, Ph.D., Simmons College Dissertation Director: Richard J. Cox, Ph.D., Advisor ii Copyright © by Donghee Sinn 2007 iii RECORDS AND THE UNDERSTANDING OF VIOLENT EVENTS: ARCHIVAL DOCUMENTATION, HISTORICAL PERCEPTION, AND THE NO GUN RI MASSACRE IN THE KOREAN WAR Donghee Sinn, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2007 The archival community has long shown an interest in documenting history, and it has been assumed that archival materials are one of the major sources of historical research. However, little is known about how much impact archival holdings actually have on historical research, what role they play in building public knowledge about a historical event and how they contribute to the process of recording history. The case of the No Gun Ri incident provides a good example of how archival materials play a role in historical discussions and a good opportunity to look at archival contributions. This dissertation examines how archival materials were discovered and used in the process of identifying the controversies raised in No Gun Ri research by examining the earliest to the most recent publications, their authors’ patterns of conducting their research and their perceptions on using archives. In doing so, a content analysis of No Gun Ri publications was employed and interviews with No Gun Ri researchers were conducted for this study. In No Gun Ri research, archival documents were essential source materials for details about the incident and a major player in stimulating heated controversies and discussions and, consequently, provided the impetus for further publications by No Gun Ri researchers. Archival documents were especially critical for specific details of the incident as well as a good source for background and circumstantial information. General record keeping situations - such as missing documents - also provided a circumstantial context of the incident. However, No Gun Ri researchers agreed that oral history was the most valuable and influential evidence for their major ideas and used archival documents to provide hard facts about the details of oral history. There are some unique research patterns of No Gun Ri researchers identified in this study which are different from typical assumptions of archivists. Archival programs should have an accurate understanding about how their holdings are iv used (or not used) and why; consequently, this study regarding the use of archival materials in the evolution of the discussion of the No Gun Ri massacre will provide the fundamental information within an empirical framework. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE...................................................................................................................................... ix TRANSLITERATION FOR KOREAN NAMES OF PERSONS AND PLACES....................... xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS.................................................................................... 1 1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY............................................................................... 8 1.3 TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 10 1.4 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................ 11 1.5 STRUCTURE AND OUTLINE .................................................................................. 12 1.6 LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................ 14 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW..................................................................................................... 16 2.1 PUBLIC MEMORY, WAR HISTORY, AND ARCHIVES ....................................... 17 2.2 DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN LEGAL AND ARCHIVAL ASPECTS ....................................................................................................... 34 2.3 USER STUDIES IN ARCHIVES................................................................................ 47 3.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 55 3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN ................................................................................................. 55 3.2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND............................................................................. 56 3.2.1 Grounded Theory Approach ......................................................................... 56 3.2.2 Applicability to this Research....................................................................... 58 3.3 DATA COLLECTION AND CONTENT ANALYSIS .............................................. 60 3.3.1 Data Set of Historical Description: Contents of Research............................ 60 3.3.2 Data Set of User Perception: Interview of Researchers................................ 62 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS AND TECHNIQUE.................................................. 64 3.4.1 Publication Analysis ..................................................................................... 64 vi 3.4.2 Interviews...................................................................................................... 66 4.0 NO GUN RI MASSACRE: HISTORICAL SKETCH ......................................................... 68 5.0 NO GUN RI INCIDENT: ARCHIVAL DOCUMENTATION............................................ 87 5.1 BEFORE SEPTEMBER 29, 1999: BEGINNING OF THE EARLY DISCUSSIONS90 5.2 SEPTEMBER 29, 1999 TO MAY 11, 2000: AP STORY’S PREDOMINANCE ...... 98 5.3 MAY 11, 2000 TO JANUARY 12, 2001: VERACITY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING NEWS SOURCES................................................................................... 120 5.4 AFTER JANUARY 11, 2001: GOVERNMENTS’ INVESTIGATION REPORTS 139 6.0 THE NO GUN RI INCIDENT: HISTORICAL PERCEPTION......................................... 171 6.1 RESEARCH PROCESS IN TERMS OF USING ARCHIVES................................. 172 6.2 IDENTIFYING, LOCATING, AND SEARCHING ARCHIVES ............................ 180 6.3 CREDIBILITY OF SOURCE MATERIALS............................................................ 186 6.4 RESEARCHERS’ PERCEPTION OF USING ARCHIVES..................................... 195 7.0 IMPLICATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS ........................................................................... 201 7.1 FINDINGS OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS.............................................................. 202 7.2 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY AND FURTHER RESEARCH DIRECTION ... 214 7.3 CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................... 218 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................ 222 APPENDIX B ............................................................................................................................. 256 APPENDIX C ............................................................................................................................. 269 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................................................................................... 272 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Timeframes for Analysis ................................................................................................ 88 Table 2. The Number of Publications before Septermber 29, 1999 ............................................. 90 Table 3. No Gun Ri Discussions in the First Period ..................................................................... 97 Table 4. The Number of Publications from September 29, 1999 to May 10, 2000...................... 99 Table 5. Discussions on the Background of No Gun Ri in the Second Period ........................... 105 Table 6. Discussions of Refugee Problems and Policies in the Second Period.......................... 107 Table 7. Discussions on the Evolution of the No Gun Ri in the Second Period ......................... 111 Table 8. Discussions on the No Gun Ri Research in the Second Period .................................... 116 Table 9. Most Used Archival and Secondary Materials in the Second Period........................... 118 Table 10. The Number of Publications from May 11, 2000 to January 12, 2001 ...................... 121 Table 11. Discussions on the Background of No Gun Ri in the Third Period ............................ 124 Table 12. Discussions on the Evolution of the No Gun Ri in the Third Period.......................... 128 Table 13. Discussions of Refugee Problems and Policies in the Third Period........................... 130 Table 14. Discussions on the No Gun Ri Research in the Third Period ....................................
Recommended publications
  • A War Crime Against an Ally's Civilians: the No Gun Ri Massacre

    A War Crime Against an Ally's Civilians: the No Gun Ri Massacre

    A WAR CRIME AGAINST AN ALLY'S CIVILIANS: THE NO GUN RI MASSACRE TAE-UNG BAIK* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................ 456 I. THE ANATOMY OF THE No GUN Ri CASE ............ 461 A. Summary of the Incident ......................... 461 1. The Korean War (1950-1953) .............. 461 2. Three Night and Four Day Massacre ....... 463 * Research Intern, Human Rights Watch, Asia Division; Notre Dame Law School, LL.M, 2000, cum laude, Notre Dame Law Fellow, 1999-2001; Seoul National University, LL.B., 1990; Columnist, HANGYORE DAILY NEWSPAPER, 1999; Editor, FIDES, Seoul National University College of Law, 1982-1984. Publi- cations: A Dfferent View on the Kwangju Democracy Movement in 1980, THE MONTHLY OF LABOR LIBERATION LrrERATuRE, Seoul, Korea, May 1990. Former prisonerof conscience adopted by Amnesty International in 1992; released in 1998, after six years of solitary confinement. This article is a revised version of my LL.M. thesis. I dedicate this article to the people who helped me to come out of the prison. I would like to thank my academic adviser, Professor Juan E. Mendez, Director of the Center for Civil and Human Rights, for his time and invaluable advice in the course of writing this thesis. I am also greatly indebted to Associate Director Garth Meintjes, for his assistance and emotional support during my study in the Program. I would like to thank Dr. Ada Verloren Themaat and her husband for supplying me with various reading materials and suggesting the title of this work; Professor Dinah Shelton for her lessons and class discussions, which created the theoreti- cal basis for this thesis; and Ms.
  • Korean War Timeline America's Forgotten War by Kallie Szczepanski, About.Com Guide

    Korean War Timeline America's Forgotten War by Kallie Szczepanski, About.Com Guide

    Korean War Timeline America's Forgotten War By Kallie Szczepanski, About.com Guide At the close of World War II, the victorious Allied Powers did not know what to do with the Korean Peninsula. Korea had been a Japanese colony since the late nineteenth century, so westerners thought the country incapable of self-rule. The Korean people, however, were eager to re-establish an independent nation of Korea. Background to the Korean War: July 1945 - June 1950 Library of Congress Potsdam Conference, Russians invade Manchuria and Korea, US accepts Japanese surrender, North Korean People's Army activated, U.S. withdraws from Korea, Republic of Korea founded, North Korea claims entire peninsula, Secretary of State Acheson puts Korea outside U.S. security cordon, North Korea fires on South, North Korea declares war July 24, 1945- President Truman asks for Russian aid against Japan, Potsdam Aug. 8, 1945- 120,000 Russian troops invade Manchuria and Korea Sept. 9, 1945- U.S. accept surrender of Japanese south of 38th Parallel Feb. 8, 1948- North Korean People's Army (NKA) activated April 8, 1948- U.S. troops withdraw from Korea Aug. 15, 1948- Republic of Korea founded. Syngman Rhee elected president. Sept. 9, 1948- Democratic People's Republic (N. Korea) claims entire peninsula Jan. 12, 1950- Sec. of State Acheson says Korea is outside US security cordon June 25, 1950- 4 am, North Korea opens fire on South Korea over 38th Parallel June 25, 1950- 11 am, North Korea declares war on South Korea North Korea's Ground Assault Begins: June - July 1950 Department of Defense / National Archives UN Security Council calls for ceasefire, South Korean President flees Seoul, UN Security Council pledges military help for South Korea, U.S.
  • SEHUN OH, Ph.D. the Ohio State University College of Social Work 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210 Office: (614) 292-5239 Email: Oh.570@Osu.Edu

    SEHUN OH, Ph.D. the Ohio State University College of Social Work 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210 Office: (614) 292-5239 Email: [email protected]

    Updated on August 27, 2019 SEHUN OH, Ph.D. The Ohio State University College of Social Work 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210 Office: (614) 292-5239 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION May 2019 The University of Texas at Austin Doctor of Philosophy in Social Work Dissertation Title: “Helping Americans achieve sustainable economic self-sufficiency: A reevaluation of the effects of human capital development approaches on employment and substance misuse” Committee: Drs. Diana DiNitto (Chair), Daniel Powers (Co-chair, Sociology), Cynthia Franklin, Yolanda Padilla, and Cynthia Osborne (Public Affairs) August 2014 Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea Master of Social Welfare Concentration: Family Welfare and Social Insurance October 2008 University of Rochester, Rochester, New York Master of Arts in Economics June 2006 University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin Bachelor of Arts in Economics: Mathematical Emphasis (with Distinction) ACADEMIC POSITIONS June 2019 – Assistant Professor Present College of Social Work, The Ohio State University June 2009 – Lecturer May 2012 Department of Law and Economics, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, South Korea GRANTS AND RESEARCH SUPPORT August 2018 – Developing Collaborative Research Partnerships in Greater Boston (KL2 December 2018 TR001411) Funding agency: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NIH) Total award amount: $247,442 Role: Statistical Consultant January 2010 – An analysis of the cadet-selection system at Korea Military Academy December 2010 Funding agency: Hwarang Dae
  • Depictions of the Korean War: Picasso to North Korean Propaganda

    Depictions of the Korean War: Picasso to North Korean Propaganda

    Depictions of the Korean War: Picasso to North Korean Propaganda Spanning from the early to mid-twentieth century, Korea was subject to the colonial rule of Japan. Following the defeat of the Axis powers in the Second World War, Korea was liberated from the colonial era that racked its people for thirty-five-years (“Massacre at Nogun-ri"). In Japan’s place, the United States and the Soviet Union moved in and occupied, respectively, the South and North Korean territories, which were divided along an arbitrary boundary at the 38th parallel (Williams). The world’s superpowers similarly divided defeated Germany and the United States would go on to promote a two-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The divisions of Korea and Germany, results of the ideological clash between the democratic United States and the communist Soviet Union, set the stage for the ensuing Cold War. On the 25th of June in 1950, North Korean forces, with support from the Soviet Union, invaded South Korea, initiating the Korean, or “Forgotten,” War. Warfare continued until 1953, when an armistice was signed between Chinese and North Korean military commanders and the U.S.-led United Nations Command (Williams). Notably, South Korea was not a signatory of the armistice; South Korea’s exclusion highlights the unusual circumstance that the people of Korea, a people with a shared history, were divided by the United States and the Soviet Union and incited by the super powers to fight amongst themselves in a proxy war between democracy and communism (Young-na Kim). Though depictions of the Korean War are inextricably tied to the political and social ideologies that launched the peninsula into conflict, no matter an artist’s background, his work imparts upon the viewer the indiscriminate ruination the war brought to the people of Korea.
  • No Gun Ri Massacre and the Battle of Changjin Reservoir: the Korean War in Lark and Termite and the Coldest Night

    No Gun Ri Massacre and the Battle of Changjin Reservoir: the Korean War in Lark and Termite and the Coldest Night

    【연구논문】 No Gun Ri Massacre and The Battle of Changjin Reservoir: The Korean War in Lark and Termite and The Coldest Night Jae Eun Yoo (Hanyang University) A few days after the 9/11 terrorist attack, scholars of history noted, with much concern, a fierce revival of the Cold War rhetoric. This was first observed in President Bush’s speeches and then quickly spread to official government discourses, media, and popular culture. In various studies of the post-9/11 America, historians such as Mary Dudziak, Marilyn Young, Amy Kaplan, Elaine Tyler May, and Bruce Cumings argue that the striking similarity between the rhetoric employed by the Bush administration and the cold war propaganda of the 1950s testify to the strength of the Cold War legacies. In other words, official and popular responses to 9/11 in the U.S. closely followed the protocols and beliefs formed and practiced in the earlier era of crisis. For instance, May points out that it was “during the cold war” that “the apparatus of wartime” became “a permanent feature of American life” 162 Jae Eun Yoo not only as rhetorical, but as a societal structuring principle” (9/11 220). If, as Jodi Kim argues, the Cold War has produceda hermeneutics peculiar to its social and international conditions, the same paradigm continues to shape the U.S. and its international relations today. The return of the Cold War’s political and cultural paradigm in the days following 9/11 manifests the often unnoticed fact that the legacies of the Cold War continues to exert their power at present; the recognition of such lasting influences of the Cold War era appears to have triggered a renewed interest in re-interpreting the historical period that has been popularly considered as terminated in triumph.
  • The Causes of the Korean War, 1950-1953

    The Causes of the Korean War, 1950-1953

    The Causes of the Korean War, 1950-1953 Ohn Chang-Il Korea Military Academy ABSTRACT The causes of the Korean War (1950-1953) can be examined in two categories, ideological and political. Ideologically, the communist side, including the Soviet Union, China, and North Korea, desired to secure the Korean peninsula and incorporate it in a communist bloc. Politically, the Soviet Union considered the Korean peninsula in the light of Poland in Eastern Europe—as a springboard to attack Russia—and asserted that the Korean government should be “loyal” to the Soviet Union. Because of this policy and strategic posture, the Soviet military government in North Korea (1945-48) rejected any idea of establishing one Korean government under the guidance of the United Nations. The two Korean governments, instead of one, were thus established, one in South Korea under the blessing of the United Nations and the other in the north under the direction of the Soviet Union. Observing this Soviet posture on the Korean peninsula, North Korean leader Kim Il-sung asked for Soviet support to arm North Korean forces and Stalin fully supported Kim and secured newly-born Communist China’s support for the cause. Judging that it needed a buffer zone against the West and Soviet aid for nation building, the Chinese government readily accepted a role to aid North Korea, specifically, in case of full American intervention in the projected war. With full support from the Soviet Union and comradely assistance from China, Kim Il-sung attacked South Korea with forces that were better armed, equipped, and prepared than their counterparts in South Korea.
  • Center for East Asian Studies Newsnotes Korea: a Divided

    Center for East Asian Studies Newsnotes Korea: a Divided

    Center for East Asian Studies NewsNotes 1440 Jayhawk Blvd., #202, Lawrence, KS 66045 Tel: (785) 864-3849 Fax: (785) 864-5034 [email protected] www.ceas.ku.edu Vol. 14 No. 3 East Asian Library Homepage: www2.lib.ku.edu/eastasia/ April 1, 2005 Korea: A Divided Nation on the World Stage A 10-day program of conferences, films, and exhibitions, organized by the Center for East Asian Studies and the Office of International Programs, and co-sponsored by International Studies, the Political Science Department, and American Studies at KU and by the Truman Presidential Museum and Library will begin on April 5. These events are held in conjunction with the dedication of the Korean War Memorial at KU on April 16 (8:30 a.m.). The conferences and films are free and open to the public. Information packets will be provided to those who pre- register for the conferences; to pre-register, email: [email protected] Focus on Korea: Part I: “Korea Today” (April 9th) The first of two academic conferences will be devoted to Korean culture and politics. The morning session, “Korean Religion, Society and Art,” will be held in the Spencer Museum of Art auditorium and begins with coffee at 8:30. The first panel will examine “Religion and Society.” Professor Ed Canda (School of Social Welfare), will give a talk called “The Spiritual Cauldron: Religions in Contemporary South Korea”. He will be followed by Kelly Chong (Sociology), whose lecture is entitled “Negotiating Modernity: the Politics of Gender and Conversion in Contemporary South Korean Evangelicalism.” The panel will conclude with “From Korea to Kansas City: Local perspectives on Korean Diaspora” by Anne Soon Choi (American Studies).
  • Empowering English Teachers in the Globalization Era

    Empowering English Teachers in the Globalization Era

    www.kate.or.kr The Korea Association of Teachers of English 2011 International Conference PROGRAM Empowering English Teachers in the Globalization Era July 1st (Friday) - July 2nd (Saturday), 2011 Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea 2011 KATE International Conference Hosted by Yonsei University Organized by The Korea Association of Teachers of English Sponsored by The National Research Foundation of Korea British Council Korea Embassy of the United States International Communication Foundation CHUNGDAHM Learning English Mou Mou Hyundae Yong-O-Sa Daekyo This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korea Government. KATE Executive Board July 2010-June 2012 President Jin-Wan Kim (Seoul National University) Vice Presidents - Journal Editing & Publication Jong-Bai Hwang (Konkuk University) - Planning & Coordination Moon-Sub Han (Hanyang University) - Research & Development Kilryoung Lee (Hankuk Univ. of Foreign Studies) - Public Relations Sang-Ho Han (Gyeongju University) - International Affairs & Information Joo-Kyung Park (Honam University) Secretary Generals Jihyeon Jeon (Ewha Womans University) Jungmin Ko (Sungshin Women's University) Treasurer Jin-Hwa Lee (Chung-Ang University) International Affairs Officers Hikyoung Lee (Korea University) Isaiah WonHo Yoo (Sogang University) Yuah Vicky Chon (Hanyang University) Public Relations Officers Seok-Chae Rhee (Yonsei University) Taeyoung Jeong (The Korea Military Academy) Yunjoo Park (Korea National Open University) Research & Development Officers Jeong-Won
  • College Codes (Outside the United States)

    College Codes (Outside the United States)

    COLLEGE CODES (OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES) ACT CODE COLLEGE NAME COUNTRY 7143 ARGENTINA UNIV OF MANAGEMENT ARGENTINA 7139 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF ENTRE RIOS ARGENTINA 6694 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TUCUMAN ARGENTINA 7205 TECHNICAL INST OF BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA 6673 UNIVERSIDAD DE BELGRANO ARGENTINA 6000 BALLARAT COLLEGE OF ADVANCED EDUCATION AUSTRALIA 7271 BOND UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7122 CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7334 CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6610 CURTIN UNIVERSITY EXCHANGE PROG AUSTRALIA 6600 CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AUSTRALIA 7038 DEAKIN UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6863 EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7090 GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6901 LA TROBE UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6001 MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6497 MELBOURNE COLLEGE OF ADV EDUCATION AUSTRALIA 6832 MONASH UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7281 PERTH INST OF BUSINESS & TECH AUSTRALIA 6002 QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF TECH AUSTRALIA 6341 ROYAL MELBOURNE INST TECH EXCHANGE PROG AUSTRALIA 6537 ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AUSTRALIA 6671 SWINBURNE INSTITUTE OF TECH AUSTRALIA 7296 THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 7317 UNIV OF MELBOURNE EXCHANGE PROGRAM AUSTRALIA 7287 UNIV OF NEW SO WALES EXCHG PROG AUSTRALIA 6737 UNIV OF QUEENSLAND EXCHANGE PROGRAM AUSTRALIA 6756 UNIV OF SYDNEY EXCHANGE PROGRAM AUSTRALIA 7289 UNIV OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA EXCHG PRO AUSTRALIA 7332 UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE AUSTRALIA 7142 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA AUSTRALIA 7027 UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA 7276 UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE AUSTRALIA 6331 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA 7265 UNIVERSITY
  • Presidential Instability in a Developing Country: Reassessing South Korean Politics from a State-Society Relations Perspective

    Presidential Instability in a Developing Country: Reassessing South Korean Politics from a State-Society Relations Perspective

    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE June 2017 Presidential Instability in a Developing Country: Reassessing South Korean Politics from a State-Society Relations Perspective Kyung-hwa Kim Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Kyung-hwa, "Presidential Instability in a Developing Country: Reassessing South Korean Politics from a State-Society Relations Perspective" (2017). Dissertations - ALL. 711. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/711 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This study attempts to explain why ALL of South Korean presidents, without exception and notwithstanding their individual major contributions to the process of Korea’s development, have fallen victim to disgraceful downfalls. For the analysis, I employ S.N. Sangmpam’s middle-range theory that establishes a causal link between society-rooted politics and political outcomes. Building on his analytical frameworks that non-Western countries are characterized by over-politicization in politics as a function of social context, I argue that patterned downfalls of all Korean presidents are an institutional outcome of over-politicization in Korean politics, which is itself a function of not fully entrenched capitalist society. In support of my thesis, I test three hypotheses. Hypotheses one and two posit Korea’s tenacious traditional and cultural traits as an internal modifier of capitalism and the nation’s dependent nature of its relationships with the United States and Japan as an external factor that prevented capitalist entrenchment in Korean society.
  • The Bible and Empire in the Divided Korean Peninsula in Search for a Theological Imagination for Just Peace

    The Bible and Empire in the Divided Korean Peninsula in Search for a Theological Imagination for Just Peace

    University of Dublin Trinity College The Bible and Empire in the Divided Korean Peninsula In Search for a Theological Imagination for Just Peace A Dissertation Submitted For the Degree of DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY By Youngseop Lim Irish School of Ecumenics February 2021 Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the Library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. Signed: _____________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ iii Summary The major objective of this thesis is to examine the relationship between biblical interpretation and imperialism in the context of the Korean conflict. This study takes its starting point in the questions of what caused the Korean conflict, and what role the Bible has played in the divided Korean church and society. In order to find answers to these questions, this study is carried out in several steps. The first step is to explore just peace and imperial peace in the Bible as a conceptual framework. The second step seeks to reconstruct the history of Korean Christianity, the relationship between church and state, and the impact of American church and politics from postcolonial perspective. As the third step, this study focuses on the homiletical discourses of Korean megachurches in terms of their relation to the dominant ideologies, such as anticommunism, national security, pro-Americanism, and economic prosperity.
  • Korea's Royal Families: Presidential Politics And

    Korea's Royal Families: Presidential Politics And

    KOREA’S ROYAL FAMILIES: PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS AND THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF CHAEBŎL REFORM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES MAY 2014 By Rob York Thesis Committee: Young-a Park, chairperson Jun Yoo Sang-Hyop Lee Keywords: Korea, Asian Studies, corporate governance, politics © 2014, Robert J. York 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the support of many individuals, namely my academic advisor, Young-a Park and committee members Jun Yoo and Sang-Hyop Lee. Each supplied a wealth of knowledge and gave generously of their time during this process, and I’m grateful to the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa for gathering many knowledgeable Korea specialists onto one campus. Finally, I want to thank my wife and family for their support during the completion of this degree. 3 ABSTRACT For decades South Korean politicians, pundits, and citizens have criticized the chaebŏl, the massive, family-owned conglomerates who take up a disproportionate share of the nation’s wealth and who use their influence to avoid penalties for law-breaking. However, political considerations, as well as the chaebŏl’s role in Korea’s post-war economic miracle, have caused reform efforts to fizzle once presidential candidates make their way into office. This thesis analyzes scholarly assessments of Korea’s presidents, their policies on economy and finance, and the political considerations each faced in dealing with the large business groups. It challenges the claims of these business groups, and their supporters, of the chaebŏl’s indispensability by comparing Korea to Taiwan, which enjoyed similar successes by fostering smaller businesses.