Glenn Robins. The Bishop of the Old South: The Ministry and Civil War Legacy of Leonidas Polk. Macon: Mercer University Press, 2006. xii + 243 pp. $35.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-88146-038-4.

Reviewed by Brian C. Miller

Published on H-CivWar (October, 2007)

For years, Civil War historians have endeav‐ environment where he learned the importance of ored to write military biographies that both exam‐ family, religion, and morality. In 1823, Polk re‐ ine the details of battles and campaigns and try to ceived an appointment to the Mili‐ make sense of one person's life in the midst of tary Academy at West Point, hoping that his mili‐ chaos and war. Recently-- refecting an attempt to tary service could rival his family's long military understand not only how the subject shaped soci‐ tradition, stretching back to the American Revolu‐ ety, but consequently, how society shaped the in‐ tion and even the English Civil War. Polk excelled dividual--biographies have expanded their focus academically at the academy, graduating eighth to memory, legacy, and more cultural analysis. out of thirty-eight. Yet, his stay in New York had a Glenn Robins has delved into this new form of bi‐ more profound impact on his life. He embraced ographical writing with his latest work, which ex‐ Christianity, decided to enter the ministry, and re‐ amines the life and legacy of Leonidas Polk. De‐ ceived baptism in the chapel on May 25, 1826, a spite the fact that many of Polk's early papers frst for a West Point cadet. Thus, when gradua‐ vanished in the fames of a cabin fre, Robins suc‐ tion day arrived, Polk resigned from the military cessfully explores Polk's life and ofers rich details and went on to enter the ministry, despite the ob‐ concerning religion, planter ideology, and the jections from his father, William, who wanted his roots of southern nationalism. son to prove his masculine worth through mili‐ Polk, who Robins calls "one of the most im‐ tary service. portant Episcopal leaders of the antebellum In the fall of 1828, Polk traveled to New York South," worked to make Episcopalians a vibrant City to study Hebrew and later entered the Vir‐ denomination in the face of competition from the ginia Theological Seminary. As he battled constant entrenched Baptists and Methodists (p. x). Born health problems that took him to Europe to recov‐ on April 10, 1806 to parents of an aristocratic fam‐ er, Polk eventually returned to the United States ily in , Leonidas Polk grew up in an and received a tremendous amount of responsi‐ H-Net Reviews bility from the Episcopal church, with jurisdiction Union and Confederate forces, the state of Ken‐ covering "Arkansas, Mississippi, , coastal tucky ordered the Confederates out and sided Alabama, the Republic of Texas, and other south‐ with the Union two weeks after the invasion. Even western territories designated ambiguously as the with the mishap in Kentucky, Polk continued to 'Indian Territory'" (p. 52). Earning the distinction garner notice with his military performance at of being elected First Bishop of Louisiana in 1841, Belmont, Missouri, Shiloh, Tennessee, and Per‐ he worked throughout his region, especially with ryville, Kentucky, and spent much of 1863 in Ten‐ other priests, highlighting the importance of par‐ nessee, where he criticized General Braxton ticipation in benevolent agencies. Amidst his reli‐ Bragg's military capabilities and called for his gious devotion, Polk also married Frances Ann transfer. Bragg, holding a grudge against Polk, Devereux on May 6, 1830 and purchased a sugar suspended him after the Battle at Chickamauga in plantation in Louisiana in 1841, the same year he September 1863, charging him with "'disobedi‐ was elected bishop. Polk came to own over 200 ence of the lawful command of his superior of‐ slaves, making him "among the seventeen largest cer'" (quoted, p. 181). Polk appealed and found slaveholding clergymen in the entire South" as he himself transferred by Jeferson Davis to Missis‐ managed his plantation from 1841-1854 (p. 96). sippi. General Joseph Johnston would later ask Polk eventually abandoned plantation work due Polk to join him and the in to high debt, some of which resulted from a torna‐ 1864 during the . do that inficted severe damage on his plantation Throughout his discussion of Polk's wartime in Louisiana in 1851. performance, Robins notes his popularity among Polk followed up his years as a planter with his fellow soldiers and ofcers. Polk performed continued service to the Episcopal Church, now death rites for Major Eddy Butler and ofciated at helping it select a plot of land for a new university the wedding of . He also bap‐ in Tennessee. In 1856, the trustees agreed with tized General on May 12, 1864, us‐ Polk's suggestion for the University of the South to ing rainwater collected in a tin cup, prior to the be established at Sewanee, Tennessee. As a found‐ battle at Resaca, . During a strategy meet‐ ing member of the college, Polk worked to collect ing at Pine Mountain, Georgia, on , 1864, donations to form an endowment for the school Union artillery shells began falling and as the from 1857-1860. He particularly focused on dona‐ Confederate ofcers departed, Polk was hit and tions from other wealthy planters, which must killed instantly. His death shocked many within have been assisted by his stronger defense of slav‐ the ranks of the army and several tributes arose ery, especially in the face of constant pressure from soldiers, civilians and ofcers. Polk would from abolitionists. As the Civil War entered its be buried in Augusta, Georgia, and later re-in‐ frst months, President Jeferson Davis ofered terred in in the twentieth century, a Polk a military command at the rank of Major more ftting burial locale for a man who had General three times; Polk declined twice before served in the state for several years as Bishop. accepting the third ofer. Polk's death does not end Robins's work, as he Davis placed Polk in command in the west, concludes with an assessment of Polk's legacy. which included many of the states he had worked Robins admits that Polk had only a mediocre mili‐ in as bishop. He arrived in Memphis on July 13, tary record, yet tribute after tribute praised him 1861, setting up headquarters and planning to in‐ as one of the best and brightest leaders in the vade Kentucky, a neutral state. His invasion com‐ Confederacy. The author attributes this status to menced on . Despite the presence of how the Lost Cause "enthusiasts crafted a positive

2 H-Net Reviews image of Leonidas Polk because the bishop as gen‐ eral validated their contention that Southern slav‐ ery had not been immoral or exploitative but rather a means for Christianizing a less fortunate and docile race" (p. 215). Furthermore, Polk died on the battlefeld, which seems to have erased many of his military blunders from the memory of soldiers and ofcers alike. Countering historian Charles Reagan Wilson's assertion to the contrary, Robins argues that the University of the South, one of the legacies left behind by Polk, "did not promote the Lost Cause as a type of civil religion" (p. 198). While former Confederates did work at the school, Robins notes that they isolated them‐ selves from the New South and returned to an ed‐ ucation system solely based on Episcopalian and Oxonian traditions. Thus, the University of the South may not have been as infuential in propa‐ gating the Lost Cause as other historians have pre‐ viously argued. Yet, there were some moments, especially in the fnal section, where I wanted more from Robins. While he mainly touches on the Lost Cause and legacy building, Robins could have ex‐ plored the memory of Leonidas Polk in greater detail. Are the tributes that portrayed him on such a high level a direct product of the Lost Cause? Did support for Polk come from the detractors of Bragg, who pointed the fnger at Bragg for failure in the war? How does Polk compare to other reli‐ gious leaders who fought in the war? Did the oth‐ er religious leaders who owned slaves have to rec‐ oncile enslavement and Christianity in the same manner as Polk? These ultimately are only minor points of consideration. Robins has not only pro‐ duced a new cultural biography well worth ex‐ ploring, but he has also added a new dimension to the historiography of the Lost Cause and the meaning of the in the minds and memories of Americans today.

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-civwar

3 H-Net Reviews

Citation: Brian C. Miller. Review of Robins, Glenn. The Bishop of the Old South: The Ministry and Civil War Legacy of Leonidas Polk. H-CivWar, H-Net Reviews. October, 2007.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=13638

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

4