Fire Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fire Management Plan Fire Management Plan Ngarkat District Incorporating Ngarkat, Carcuma and Kelvin Powrie Conservation Parks; Hardings Springs Conservation Reserve; included Crown Lands and participating Heritage Agreements Department for Environment and Heritage Department for Environment and Heritage South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources PREPARE. ACT. SURVIVE. Management Board www.environment.sa.gov.auwww.environment.sa.gov.au This plan has been produced by the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage with the support of the Australian Government through the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT). For further information please contact: Department for Environment and Heritage Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department for Environment and Heritage office. This Fire Management Plan is also available from: Hhttp://www.environment.sa.gov.au/parks/management/fireplanning.html Front Cover: Ngarkat Conservation Park by Brett Stephens Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department for Environment and Heritage. Apart from fair dealings and other uses permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced, published, communicated, transmitted, modified or commercialised without the prior written approval of the Department for Environment and Heritage. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department for Environment and Heritage GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Heritage makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication. Reference to any company, product or service in this publication should not be taken as a Departmental endorsement of the company, product or service. © Department for Environment and Heritage September 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ngarkat Conservation Park (CP) is the largest protected area of remnant vegetation in settled South Australia. The reserve, along with Carcuma CP, Kelvin Powrie CP, Hardings Springs Conservation Reserve (CR), adjacent unalienated Crown land and Heritage Agreements, represents 300 000 hectares of heath habitat. It contains a diverse range of flora and fauna species, including some threatened species exclusively found within the region. The recognition that inappropriate fire regimes present a threat to biodiversity regardless of land tenure is important in such a fire-prone landscape. As such, the development of this plan has been funded by the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin (SAMDB) Natural Resources Management (NRM) Board. This Draft Fire Management Plan for the Ngarkat district has been developed to provide direction for fire management activities, including bushfire suppression, in the region. The plan emphasises the protection of life and property as well as providing direction for land managers in the protection and enhancement of the natural and cultural heritage of Ngarkat and its surrounds. Implementation of the recommendations and works listed in this plan is subject to available resources as well as regional and statewide priorities. Some degree of flexibility will need to remain for fire suppression in those areas where there has only been partial implementation of works. The Ngarkat district was identified as a priority for fire management planning within Department for Environment and Heritage (DEH) Murraylands Region to address the following issues: • general protection of life, property and environmental values in the plan area • protection of important habitat for many species and communities including those with conservation ratings • the landscape protection of blocks and reserves, to reduce the likelihood of a whole reserve or large portion of a reserve burning in a single fire event. These issues were addressed by: • applying a risk assessment process to identify life, property and environmental values at risk from bushfires • applying DEH Fire Management Zoning Principles to manage fuel in Asset and Buffer Zones • identifying significant ecological assets and applying Ecological Fire Management Guidelines to determine appropriate burning in Conservation Zones • auditing tracks within the DEH reserves using the Government Agencies Fire Liaison Committee’s (GAFLC) “South Australian Guidelines for State Government Agencies: Firebreaks and Fire Access Tracks”. Ngarkat District Fire Management Plan i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A number of recommendations as result of applying the above processes have been identified. • Prescribed burning to: reduce fuel in Asset and Buffer zones as outlined in the plan (other methods of fuel reduction will also be used, and in some cases is specifically mentioned) reduce fuel in strategic areas within Conservation zones to provide landscape and habitat protection within the plan area and known threatened species populations create mosaics of areas with a range of different fire ages. • Track upgrades (in accordance with GAFLC guidelines). • Identification of suppression considerations that may assist bushfire suppression operations to contribute to improved fire management. The local community and South Australian Country Fire Service (CFS) volunteers have contributed extensive amounts of time, energy and resources to fire suppression in the Ngarkat district and they are to be commended for this contribution. The co-operation of stakeholders such as DEH, CFS, the apiary industry, Heritage Agreement owners, adjacent landholders and the local community will be critical to the success of the plan. The recognition that fire presents a genuine risk to a variety of land tenures within this plan area provides a unique opportunity to manage the landscape with respect to fire through combining the resources and experience of stakeholders. The draft plan will be released for public comment for a period of four weeks. Comments will then be evaluated and incorporated according to the submission criteria. A major review of this plan will occur after ten years of implementation, or earlier if required. Recommended works will be reviewed on an annual basis. ii Ngarkat District Fire Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... I TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... III List of Figures...................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables....................................................................................................................................... v List of Attached Maps ..................................................................................................................... v 1 RATIONALE AND KEY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Key Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 3 2 THE PLANNING FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Legislation ................................................................................................................................4 2.2 DEH Fire Management Policy ............................................................................................... 4 2.3 Zoning Policy ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Local and Regional Environmental Planning / Recovery Planning................................ 6 2.5 Reserve Management Planning .......................................................................................... 6 2.6 Fire Management in Heritage Agreements ....................................................................... 7 2.7 Fire Management and the Apiary Industry ........................................................................ 8 2.8 The Role of the Country Fire Service.................................................................................... 9 3 BUSHFIRE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Location .................................................................................................................................11 3.2 Terrain .....................................................................................................................................11 3.3 Climate, Wind and Weather...............................................................................................11 3.4 Fuel..........................................................................................................................................12 3.5 Fire Behaviour in Mallee-Heath Ecosystems .....................................................................14
Recommended publications
  • Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Management Plan
    Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Management Plan This plan of management has been prepared and adopted in pursuance of Section 38 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, Australia Department for Environment and Heritage, 2004 ISBN: 0 75901076 5 Final Edited by staff of Mallee District and Reserve Planning Department for Environment and Heritage Cartography by Reserve Planning and Benno Curth Cover photo clockwise from top left: Silvery phebalium Phabalium bullatum, Little Pygmy Possum Cercartetus lepidus on Leptospermum spp, Silver Goodenia Goodenia willisiana, Mallee Heath, Wallowa Acacia calamifolia, Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata, Mallee Heath and Western Blutongue Tiliqua occipitalis. This document may be cited as ‘Department for Environment and Heritage (2004) Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Management Plan, Adelaide, South Australia’ FIS 17148 •Feb 2004 Department for Environment and Heritage Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Incorporating Ngarkat, Mt Rescue, Mt Shaugh and Scorpion Springs Conservation Parks Management Plan March 2004 Our Parks, Our Heritage, Our Legacy Cultural richness and diversity are the marks of a great society. It is these qualities that are basic to our humanity. They are the foundation of our value systems and drive our quest for purpose and contentment. Cultural richness embodies morality, spiritual well-being, the rule of law, reverence for life, human achievement, creativity and talent, options for choice, a sense of belonging, personal worth and an acceptance of responsibility for the future. Biological richness and diversity are, in turn, important to cultural richness and communities of people. When a community ceases to value and protect its natural landscapes, it erodes the richness and wholeness of its cultural foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ngaut Ngaut Interpretive Project Final Report
    The Ngaut Ngaut Interpretive Project: Providing Culturally Sustainable Online Interpretive Content to the Public (South Australia) IPinCH Case Study – Final Report by Amy Roberts, Isobelle Campbell, and the Mannum Aboriginal Community Association Inc. 1 © 2014 Mannum Aboriginal Community Association Inc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. This research was made possible, in part, through the support of the Intellectual Property Issues in Cultural Heritage (IPinCH) project, a Major Collaborative Research Initiative funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. IPinCH explores the rights, values, and responsibilities associated with material culture, cultural knowledge and the practice of heritage research. www.sfu.ca/ipinch Front cover: The cliffs at Ngaut Ngaut. Photograph by Amy Roberts. All those whose images appear in this report have given their permission for them to be included in this document and in related IPinCH outputs. 2 “Ngaut Ngaut is part of my heritage and culture. We have to preserve it for future generations. My life would be empty without my connection to this place.” Isobelle Campbell 3 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 A Few Words on Words ............................................................................................................. 6 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal History Journal: Volume 21
    Aboriginal History Volume twenty-one 1997 Aboriginal History Incorporated The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Secretary), Peter Grimshaw (Treasurer/Public Officer), Neil Andrews, Richard Baker, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Luise Hercus, Bill Humes, Ian Keen, David Johnston, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Diane Smith, Elspeth Young. Correspondents Jeremy Beckett, Valerie Chapman, Ian Clark, Eve Fesl, Fay Gale, Ronald Lampert, Campbell Macknight, Ewan Morris, John Mulvaney, Andrew Markus, Bob Reece, Henry Reynolds, Shirley Roser, Lyndall Ryan, Bruce Shaw, Tom Stannage, Robert Tonkinson, James Urry. Aboriginal History aims to present articles and information in the field of Australian ethnohistory, particularly in the post-contact history of the Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders. Historical studies based on anthropological, archaeological, linguistic and sociological research, including comparative studies of other ethnic groups such as Pacific Islanders in Australia will be welcomed. Issues include recorded oral traditions and biographies, narratives in local languages with translations, previously unpublished manuscript accounts, resumes of current events, archival and bibliographical articles, and book reviews. Editors 1997 Rob Paton and Di Smith, Editors, Luise Hercus, Review Editor and Ian Howie Willis, Managing Editor. Aboriginal History Monograph Series Published occasionally, the monographs present longer discussions or a series of articles on single subjects of contemporary interest. Previous monograph titles are D. Barwick, M. Mace and T. Stannage (eds), Handbook of Aboriginal and Islander History; Diane Bell and Pam Ditton, Law: the old the nexo; Peter Sutton, Country: Aboriginal boundaries and land ownership in Australia; Link-Up (NSW) and Tikka Wilson, In the Best Interest of the Child? Stolen children: Aboriginal pain/white shame, Jane Simpson and Luise Hercus, History in Portraits: biographies of nineteenth century South Australian Aboriginal people.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydney Inst. of TAFE, Blacktown (Australia). ISBN-0-7310
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 412 400 CE 074 961 TITLE Numerous Connections. INSTITUTION Western Sydney Inst. of TAFE, Blacktown (Australia). ISBN ISBN-0-7310-8840-9 PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 213p. AVAILABLE FROM Adult Literacy Information Office, Level 1, 6-8 Holden Street, Ashfield, New South Wales 2131, Australia. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; Basic Skills; Foreign Countries; Instructional Materials; *Integrated Curriculum; Learning Activities; *Literacy Education; Mathematics Instruction; *Mathematics Skills; *Numeracy; Student Evaluation; Teaching Guides IDENTIFIERS Australia ABSTRACT This resource includes units of work developed by different practitioners that integrate the teaching of literacy with the teaching of numeracy in adult basic education. It is designed to provide models of integration for teachers to develop similar resources on different contexts or themes. The units follow slightly different formats. Unit lengths vary from a few sessions to the basis of a semester's work. The way in which literacy and numeracy are integrated also varies; in some units there are literacy and numeracy activities on the same theme or context, and in others activities are more closely woven. The nine sections are on these topics: water, gardens, reasonable force, aboriginal land, work, women in Australia, tourist spots, juggling pool, and banking. Components of each section include the following: learning outcomes; topics; resources; future directions; teacher notes that correlate in a column format whether the activity is primarily literacy or numeracy or both, activities, resources, and assessment; and handouts. Units list additional resources that can be used to extend the students' understanding of particular mathematical skills.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee South Australia
    A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE MURRAY MALLEE SOUTH AUSTRALIA Editors J. N. Foulkes J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2000 The Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia was carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Programs and the State Government of South Australia. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Australian Heritage Commission or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Foulkes, J. N. and Gillen, J. S. (Eds.) (2000). A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia (Biological Survey and Research, Department for Environment and Heritage and Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Environment Australia Department for Human Services, Housing, GPO Box 636 or Environment and Planning Library CANBERRA ACT 2601 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 EDITORS J. N. Foulkes and J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 AUTHORS D. M. Armstrong, J. N. Foulkes, Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001. S. Carruthers, F. Smith, S. Kinnear, Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Planning SA, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, GPO Box 1815, ADELAIDE SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Water Allocation Plan for the River Murray Prescribed Watercourse
    Draft Water Allocation Plan for the River Murray Prescribed Watercourse January 2020 Version Date Reason Section 1.0 28 February 2019 Adopted version published 1.1 7 January 2020 Draft WAP approved for consultation 5.5.2 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Regional Director, Natural Resources SA Murray-Darling Basin, PO Box 2343, Murray Bridge SA 5253. The South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board and the Government of South Australia, their employees and their servants do not warrant, or make any representation, regarding the use or results of the information contain herein as to its correctness, accuracy, currency or otherwise. The South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board and the Government of South Australia, their employees and their servants expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice herein. Aboriginal Cultural Knowledge No authority is provided by First Peoples of the River Murray and Mallee, Peramangk and Ngarrindjeri nations for the use of their cultural knowledge contained in this document without their prior written consent. ii Water Allocation Plan FOR THE RIVER MURRAY PRESCRIBED WATERCOURSE iii Page left intentionally blank iv Page left intentionally blank v Acknowledgement The South Australian Government acknowledges and respects Aboriginal people as the state’s first peoples and nations, and recognises Aboriginal people as traditional owners and occupants of land and waters in South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia
    “KEEP THAT LANGUAGE GOING!” A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia A consultancy carried out by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, South Australia by Patrick McConvell, Rob Amery, Mary-Anne Gale, Christine Nicholls, Jonathan Nicholls, Lester Irabinna Rigney and Simone Ulalka Tur May 2002 Declaration The authors of this report wish to acknowledge that South Australia’s Indigenous communities remain the custodians for all of the Indigenous languages spoken across the length and breadth of this state. Despite enormous pressures and institutionalised opposition, Indigenous communities have refused to abandon their culture and languages. As a result, South Australia is not a storehouse for linguistic relics but remains the home of vital, living languages. The wisdom of South Australia’s Indigenous communities has been and continues to be foundational for all language programs and projects. In carrying out this project, the Research Team has been strengthened and encouraged by the commitment, insight and linguistic pride of South Australia’s Indigenous communities. All of the recommendations contained in this report are premised on the fundamental right of Indigenous Australians to speak, protect, strengthen and reclaim their traditional languages and to pass them on to future generations. * Within this report, the voices of Indigenous respondents appear in italics. In some places, these voices stand apart from the main body of the report, in other places, they are embedded within sentences. The decision to incorporate direct quotations or close paraphrases of Indigenous respondent’s view is recognition of the importance of foregrounding the perspectives and aspirations of Indigenous communities across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation Action Plan 2017 – 2019
    Reconciliation Action Plan September 2017 – September 2019 Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan 1 Chief Executive Foreword On behalf of the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), I am pleased to present our Reconciliation Action Plan. The yearly review and renewal of our plan has seen us able to adapt to the changing circumstances in the Reconciliation agenda state-wide and nationally. I would like to Acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters, current land managers, and all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander South Australians. As a Department we acknowledge that Aboriginal Nations are the first managers and decision makers of Country and that Country has sustained their culture and economy for thousands of generations. The care, skill and knowledge of Aboriginal Nations has shaped the character of Country across the continent and is seen as an integrated and interdependent cultural landscape. European colonisation saw the Australian Nation-State claiming ownership of Country denying Aboriginal Nations sovereignty. Conflict as well as punitive and racist policies significantly impacted Aboriginal Nations and the trauma and inequality created by these impacts are still felt and experienced today. Across much of the State, the cultural landscape has also significantly shifted to one characterised by European agricultural land use that has disrupted the cycles of Aboriginal care and stewardship. Despite this, Aboriginal Nations continue to assert their sovereign rights and connection to Country. These shifts in the Cultural landscape place DEWNR and its staff at the forefront of engagement with Aboriginal Nations around the matter of who has authority to manage and benefit from the natural resources in South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual General Meeting Minutes 16 February 2021
    Loxton High School Governing Council Annual General Meeting – Minutes for the Meeting held at Loxton High School Library, Tuesday 16 February 2021 at 7.00pm Welcome: Principal, Mr David Garrett and then handover to Mr Tom Fielke, current Governing Council chairperson to run meeting until executive positions declared vacant and election of new members. Acknowledgement of Country: We would like to acknowledge the custodians of the land and waters of the River Murray and Mallee Region. These clans comprise seven neighbouring groups known as the Ngaiawang, the Ngawait, the Ngaralte, the Ngarkat, the Ngagkuruku, the Ngintait and the Erawirung. These clans were one nation. Today we are meeting on the traditional lands of the Erawirung people and we feel welcome. Present: Staff: David Garrett, Shannon Tootell, Tricia Yandell, Leanne Priest, Tara Deren, Lesley Peterson, Gina Nitschke (minute taker) Parents: Tom Fielke, Allison Ingerson, Kelvin Burgemeister, Simon Vause, Kimberlee Murdoch, Sonya Altschwager, Shannon Harkins, Matt Abbott, Brett Schlein, Jo Gibbs, Melinda Morena, Jason Sander Students: Joey Haenen, Tabitha Zdanowicz Apologies: Rebecca Knowles, Ann Biele, Skye Beauchamp, Kerry Albrecht-Szabo Minutes of Previous Annual General Meeting held 19 November 2019: Moved and seconded as correct: Moved: Kimberlee Murdoch Seconded: Simon Vause Carried Nominations for Governing Council election to be received: Melinda Morena, Tom Fielke, Rebecca Knowles, Ian Schneider, Ann-Louise Biele, Allison Ingerson, Jason Sander, Kelvin Burgemeister, Jo Gibbs, Brett Schlein. Reports: 1. Principal’s Report – Mr David Garrett. Moved by David Garrett and seconded by Sonya Altschwager Carried 2. High School Governing Council Chairman’s Report – Mr Tom Fielke Moved by Tom Fielke and seconded by Shannon Harkins Carried 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Source: Connecting to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Culture
    CONNECTING TO ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURE: A resource to help Carers connect children and young people in their care to their Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture 1 2 CONTENTS Page 4 What can I do to support an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander child or young person? Page 5 South Australian Aboriginal Communities Page 6 South Australian Languages Page 7 Department for Child Protection responsibilities and tools Page 9 Foster Care Agency supports Page 10 Cultural Immersion and Aboriginal Community Councils Page 13 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Service Providers and Programs Page 16 Additional Resources Page 17 Significant dates and events Page 20 Acknowledgements 3 Speak with your child’s case worker or foster care agency to find out any cultural background, history or Explore ways to use heritage. Engage in their services, language through programs, tools or seek referrals if conversation, everyday Learn through play, necessary. tasks and activities books, games, craft (pg. 7-8, 9) and activities that they (pg. 13-15, 16, 17-18) enjoy (pg. 13-15, 16, 17-18) What can I do to support an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Immerse Carer and child in culture wherever possible Listen to ATSI radio, child connect to their culture? YouTube, videos or (pg. 10-12, 13-15, 16, 17-18) songs and download apps (pg. 16) Be culturally inclusive in your home – by including an ATSI perspective and Approach your local having ATSI paintings and artwork, council, ask an elder songs and music, food, dolls/toys, or community group. fabric, books, or photos, pictures and posters.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Name SUMMARY (PNS) 6/23 BRUKANGGA and Tindale's Uses Of
    The Southern Kaurna Place Names Project The writing of this essay was funded as part of The Kaurna Project 2018-9 (coordinator Rob Amery) by the Commonwealth of Australia Ministry for the Arts through its Indigenous Languages and Arts (Languages) program. Parts of it have been built on the shoulders of essential work done by Philip Clarke on ‘The significance of whales to Aboriginal people of southern SA’ (2001). He also kindly found and copied for me Tindale’s missing document on ‘Strike-a-lights’. This and other essays may be downloaded free of charge from https://www.adelaide.edu.au/kwp/placenames/research-publ/ Place Name SUMMARY (PNS) 6/23 BRUKANGGA and Tindale’s uses of the word bruki (last edited: 22.10.2018) See also PNS 7.01/07 Tjirbuki. NOTE AND DISCLAIMER: This essay has not been peer-reviewed or culturally endorsed in detail. The spellings and interpretations contained in it (linguistic, historical and geographical) are my own, and do not necessarily represent the views of KWP/KWK or its members or any other group. I have studied history at tertiary level. Though not a linguist, for 30 years I have learned much about the Kaurna, Ramindjeri-Ngarrindjeri and Narungga languages while working with KWP, Rob Amery, and other local culture-reclamation groups; and from primary documents I have learned much about the Aboriginal history of the Adelaide-Fleurieu region. My explorations of 'language on the land' through the Southern Kaurna Place Names Project are part of an ongoing effort to correct the record about Aboriginal place-names in this region (which has abounded in confusions and errors), and to add reliable new material into the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • National Indigenous Languages Survey Report 2005 National Indigenous Languages Survey Report 2005
    National Indigenous Languages Survey Report 2005 National Indigenous Languages Survey Report 2005 Report submitted to the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies in association with the Federation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Languages Front cover photo: Yipirinya School Choir, Northern Territory. Photo by Faith Baisden Disclaimer The Commonwealth, its employees, officers and agents are not responsible for the activities of organisations and agencies listed in this report and do not accept any liability for the results of any action taken in reliance upon, or based on or in connection with this report. To the extent legally possible, the Commonwealth, its employees, officers and agents, disclaim all liability arising by reason of any breach of any duty in tort (including negligence and negligent misstatement) or as a result of any errors and omissions contained in this document. The views expressed in this report and organisations and agencies listed do not have the endorsement of the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA). ISBN 0 642753 229 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General’s Department Robert Garran Offices National Circuit CANBERRA ACT 2600 Or visit http://www.ag.gov.au/cca This report was commissioned by the former Broadcasting, Languages and Arts and Culture Branch of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Services (ATSIS).
    [Show full text]