Celebrating Our Shared History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Can’T Be What You Can’T See’: the Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students Into Higher Education
‘Can’t be what you can’t see’: The Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students into higher education Literature Review 2014 Fremantle Broome Sydney Cover Artwork: ‘Seeing Country’ by Yangkana Laurel Yangkana Laurel is a Walmajarri artist and educator from the Kadjina Community in the Kimberley region of Western Australia on the edge of the Great Sandy Desert - part of Millijidee Station. Along with her sisters, brothers and mothers, Yangkana advocated to set up the remote Wulungarra Community School. Yangkana’s commitment to education in this small community is replicated across the many universities we visited and encapsulated in the innovative models that support more Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students to transition to higher education. ‘Can’t be what you can’t see’: The Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students into higher education Literature Review 2014 The University of Notre Dame Australia (UNDA) Southern Cross University (SCU) Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education (BIITE) Project Leaders: Professor Lyn Henderson-Yates (UNDA), Professor Patrick Dodson (UNDA), Professor Marguerite Maher (UNDA), Project Management: Bruce Gorring (UNDA), Sue Thomas (UNDA) Project Team Members: Stephen Kinnane (UNDA), Dr Judith Wilks (SCU), Katie Wilson (SCU), Terri Hughes (BIITE), Sue Thomas (UNDA), Professor Neil Drew (UNDA), Dr Keith McNaught (UNDA), Dr Kevin Watson (UNDA) Report Authors: Dr Judith Wilks (SCU), Katie Wilson (SCU) “Can’t be what you can’t see”: The Transition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students into higher education: Literature Review: 20/12/13 OLT ID SI11-2138 (UNDA; SCU; BIITE) Support for the production of this report/publication has been provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. -
ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY and CULTURE Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc
ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY AND CULTURE Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, and gratefully acknowledges the support of the School of History and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University. Aboriginal History Inc. is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to the Editors, Aboriginal History Inc., ACIH, School of History, RSSS, 9 Fellows Road (Coombs Building), The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, 2601, or [email protected]. WARNING: Readers are notified that this publication may contain names or images of deceased persons. ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY AND CULTURE UNCLE ROY PATTERSON AND JENNIFER JONES Published by ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760464066 ISBN (online): 9781760464073 WorldCat (print): 1224453432 WorldCat (online): 1224452874 DOI: 10.22459/OTL.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Patterson family photograph, circa 1904 This edition © 2020 ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. Contents Acknowledgements ....................................... vii Note on terminology ......................................ix Preface .................................................xi Introduction: Meeting and working with Uncle Roy ..............1 Part 1: Sharing Taungurung history 1. -
Non-Indigenous/Aboriginal Relations in Australian Society
2. Keeping Our Distance: Non-Indigenous/Aboriginal relations in Australian society Maggie Walter In February 2008, then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made a national apology to members of the Stolen Generations. For Indigenous1 and non-Indigenous Australians alike this was a significant political and social moment. The intense media and public interest in, and scrutiny of, the apology demonstrate that the relationship between the original Australians and those who have arrived since colonisation remains salient, if not central, to who Australians are what Australians and Australia is in the twenty-first century. The terrain of this relationship is key to Australia’s self-concept, its identity as a nation and that of its peoples, old and new. Yet these relations are also highly contested. The image of Australia reflected here is a two-sided visage. One face—as manifested in the apology, the elevating of Professor Mick Dodson to 2009 Australian of the Year and the groundswell of public action in the March for Reconciliation in 2000—is openly encouraging of reconciliation and acknowledging of a historical legacy of entrenched marginalisation and poverty. The other face forestalls the prospect of formal rapprochement, casting as undeserved and unearned attempts at social, economic or political equity—a position manifested by the now long-stalled reconciliation process and the commonness of publicly expressed negative sentiment towards Indigenous peoples and culture (see, for example, Andrew Bolt’s 2008 blog in relation to the new Indigenous representative body). This distinctively Australian, but contradictory, picture suggests a country and a national identity ill at ease with the place of Indigeneity in its consciousness, one in which Indigeneity remains unreconciled with everyday concepts of Australian society and Australian identity. -
Draft As at 21 January 2003
ARTSongs: The Soul Beneath My Skin Author Croft, Pamela Joy Published 2003 Thesis Type Thesis (Professional Doctorate) School Queensland College of Art DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2049 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367423 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au ARTsong: the soul beneath my skin Pamela Joy Croft Bachelor of Arts (Fine Art) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Visual Art Queensland College of Art Griffith University Brisbane, Queensland February, 2003 1 DEDICATION Let our voices be heard for our future generations, For the justice of all Aboriginal people. The time has come for family members to be united in unison and heal together. I cannot heal alone, The time has come for us all to be in harmony, To set our loved one’s spirits free, from places that our family member’s lives had come to an end. I dedicate [this doctoral project] to the family members in remembrance of all our late loved ones whose lives came to an end in death in custody, and to the families who had suffered the pains of grief and hurt, Of these terrible fatal traumas that we had to accept throughout the years of our lives, Now being together in unison, To heal together. Daisy Rankine, Ngarrindjeri Aboriginal Elder of Meningie. The visual narratives and this exegesis could not have occurred without the love, support and motivation of my family. They continue to inspire me. -
Sorry Day Is a Day Where We Remember the Stolen Generations
Aboriginal Heritage Office Yarnuping Education Series Ku-ring-gai, Lane Cove, North Sydney, Northern Beaches, Strathfield and Willoughby Councils © Copyright Aboriginal Heritage Office www.aboriginalheritage.org Yarnuping 5 Sorry Day 26th May 2020 Karen Smith Education Officer Sorry Day is a day where we remember the Stolen Generations. Protection & Assimilation Policies Have communities survived the removal of children? The systematic removal and cultural genocide of children has an intergenerational, devastating effect on families and communities. Even Aboriginal people put into the Reserves and Missions under the Protectionist Policies would hide their children in swamps or logs. Families and communities would colour their faces to make them darker. Not that long after the First Fleet arrived in 1788, a large community of mixed ancestry children could be found in Sydney. They were named ‘Friday’, ‘Johnny’, ‘Betty’, and denied by their white fathers. Below is a writing by David Collins who witnessed this occurring: “The venereal disease also has got among them, but I fear our people have to answer for that, for though I believe none of our women had connection with them, yet there is no doubt that several of the Black women had not scrupled to connect themselves with the white men. Of the certainty of this extraordinary instance occurred. A native woman had a child by one of our people. On its coming into the world she perceived a difference in its colour, for which not knowing how to account, she endeavoured to supply by art what she found deficient in nature, and actually held the poor babe, repeatedly over the smoke of her fire, and rubbed its little body with ashes and dirt, to restore it to the hue with which her other children has been born. -
A Collaborative History of Social Innovation in South Australia
Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies University of South Australia St Bernards Road Magill South Australia 5072 Australia www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute © Rob Manwaring and University of South Australia 2008 A COLLABORATIVE HISTORY OF SOCIAL INNOVATION IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Rob Manwaring∗ Abstract In this paper I outline a collaborative history of social innovation in South Australia, a state that has a striking record of social innovation. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia would seem an unlikely location for such experimentation. This paper outlines the main periods of innovation. Appended to it is the first attempt to collate all these social innovations in one document. This paper is unique in that its account of the history of social innovation has been derived after public consultation in South Australia, and is a key output from Geoff Mulgan’s role as an Adelaide Thinker in Residence.1 The paper analyses why, at times, South Australia appears to have punched above its weight as a leader in social innovation. Drawing on Giddens’ ‘structuration’ model, the paper uses South Australian history as a case study to determine how far structure and/or agency can explain the main periods of social innovation. Introduction South Australia has a great and rich (albeit uneven) history of social innovation, and has at times punched above its weight. What makes this history so intriguing is that on the face of it, South Australia is quite an unlikely place for such innovation. South Australia is a relatively new entity; it has a relatively small but highly urbanised population, and is geographically isolated from other Australian urban centres and other developed nations. -
Tatz MIC Castan Essay Dec 2011
Indigenous Human Rights and History: occasional papers Series Editors: Lynette Russell, Melissa Castan The editors welcome written submissions writing on issues of Indigenous human rights and history. Please send enquiries including an abstract to arts- [email protected]. ISBN 978-0-9872391-0-5 Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? Colin Tatz © Indigenous Human Rights and History Vol 1(1). The essays in this series are fully refereed. Editorial committee: John Bradley, Melissa Castan, Stephen Gray, Zane Ma Rhea and Lynette Russell. Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? Colin Tatz © Colin Tatz 1 CONTENTS Editor’s Acknowledgements …… 3 Editor’s introduction …… 4 The Context …… 11 Australia and the Genocide Convention …… 12 Perceptions of the Victims …… 18 Killing Members of the Group …… 22 Protection by Segregation …… 29 Forcible Child Removals — the Stolen Generations …… 36 The Politics of Amnesia — Denialism …… 44 The Politics of Apology — Admissions, Regrets and Law Suits …… 53 Eyewitness Accounts — the Killings …… 58 Eyewitness Accounts — the Child Removals …… 68 Moving On, Moving From …… 76 References …… 84 Appendix — Some Known Massacre Sites and Dates …… 100 2 Acknowledgements The Editors would like to thank Dr Stephen Gray, Associate Professor John Bradley and Dr Zane Ma Rhea for their feedback on earlier versions of this essay. Myles Russell-Cook created the design layout and desk-top publishing. Financial assistance was generously provided by the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law and the School of Journalism, Australian and Indigenous Studies. 3 Editor’s introduction This essay is the first in a new series of scholarly discussion papers published jointly by the Monash Indigenous Centre and the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law. -
Anthropology of Indigenous Australia
Anthropology of Indigenous Australia Class code ANTH-UA 9037 – 001 Instructor Petronella Vaarzon-Morel Details [email protected] Consultations by appointment. Please allow at least 24 hours for your instructor to respond to your emails. Class Details Fall 2017 Anthropology of Indigenous Australia Tuesday 12:30 – 3:30pm 5 September to 12 December Room 202 NYU Sydney Academic Centre Science House: 157-161 Gloucester Street, The Rocks 2000 Prerequisites None. Class This course offers an introduction to some of the classical and current issues in the Description anthropology of Indigenous Australia. The role of anthropology in the representation and governance of Indigenous life is itself an important subject for anthropological inquiry, considering that Indigenous people of Australia have long been the objects of interest and imagination by outsiders for their cultural formulations of kinship, ritual, art, gender, and politics. These representations—in feature films about them (such as Rabbit-Proof Fence and Australia), New Age Literature (such as Mutant Message Down Under), or museum exhibitions (such as in the Museum of Sydney or the Australian Museum)—are now also in dialogue with Indigenous forms of cultural production, in genres as diverse as film, television, drama, dance, art and writing. The course will explore how Aboriginal people have struggled to reproduce themselves and their traditions on their own terms, asserting their right to forms of cultural autonomy and self-determination. Through the examination of ethnographic and historical texts, films, archives and Indigenous life-writing accounts, we will consider the ways in which Aboriginalities are being challenged and constructed in contemporary Australia. -
3 Researchers and Coranderrk
3 Researchers and Coranderrk Coranderrk was an important focus of research for anthropologists, archaeologists, naturalists, historians and others with an interest in Australian Aboriginal people. Lydon (2005: 170) describes researchers treating Coranderrk as ‘a kind of ethno- logical archive’. Cawte (1986: 36) has argued that there was a strand of colonial thought – which may be characterised as imperialist, self-congratulatory, and social Darwinist – that regarded Australia as an ‘evolutionary museum in which the primi- tive and civilised races could be studied side by side – at least while the remnants of the former survived’. This chapter considers contributions from six researchers – E.H. Giglioli, H.N. Moseley, C.J.D. Charnay, Rev. J. Mathew, L.W.G. Büchner, and Professor F.R. von Luschan – and a 1921 comment from a primary school teacher, named J.M. Provan, who was concerned about the impact the proposed closure of Coranderrk would have on the ability to conduct research into Aboriginal people. Ethel Shaw (1949: 29–30) has discussed the interaction of Aboriginal residents and researchers, explaining the need for a nuanced understanding of the research setting: The Aborigine does not tell everything; he has learnt to keep silent on some aspects of his life. There is not a tribe in Australia which does not know about the whites and their ideas on certain subjects. News passes quickly from one tribe to another, and they are quick to mislead the inquirer if it suits their purpose. Mr. Howitt, Mr. Matthews, and others, who made a study of the Aborigines, often visited Coranderrk, and were given much assistance by Mr. -
Minutes of Loxton High School Annual General
LOXTON HIGH SCHOL GOVERNING COUNCIL ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING MINUTES HELD ON TUESDAY 19 NOVEMBER 2019 AT 7.00PM @ LHS LIBRARY Meeting Opened: 7.05pm Welcome: Principal, Mr David Garrett and then handover to Mrs Margaret Wormald, current Governing Council chairperson to run meeting until executive positions declared vacant and election of new members. Acknowledgement of Country: We would like to acknowledge the custodians of the land and waters of the River Murray and Mallee Region. These clans comprise seven neighbouring groups known as the Ngaiawang, the Ngawait, the Ngaralte, the Ngarkat, the Ngagkuruku, the Ngintait and the Erawirung. These clans were one nation. Today we are meeting on the traditional lands of the Erawirung people and we feel welcome. Present: David Garrett, Tom Fielke Apologies: Leanne Priest, Shannon Tootell, Scott Gillett, Jill Obst Minutes of Previous Meeting: Held on 20 November 2018 at 7.00pm. Moved and seconded: Moved Kerry Albrecht-Szabo, Seconded Shannon Tootell Carried Reports: 1. Principal’s Report – Mr David Garrett. Moved by Julie-ann Phillips and seconded by Mel Morena Carried 2. High School Governing Council Chairman’s Report – Mr Tom Fielke Moved by Kerry Albrecht and seconded by Scott Gillett Carried 3. Financial Statements – Ms Lesley Peterson • Loxton High School Council Inc. Consolidated Account • Loxton High School Canteen Trading Statement • Motion to accept the 2020 budget as an interim budget with final budget to be handed down in March 2020 Lesley advised accounts are still subject to Audit. Statements attached. All Financial Statements Moved by Lesley Peterson and seconded by Scott Gillett Carried Elections: Principal, David Garrett to hold election (if necessary) Election of Governing Council Members Those remaining on Council: Rebecca Knowles, Melinda Morena, Tom Fielke, Kylie O’Shaughnessy, Ian Schneider. -
Water Allocation Plan for the RIVER MURRAY PRESCRIBED WATERCOURSE
This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Regional Director, Natural Resources SA Murray-Darling Basin, PO Box 2343, Murray Bridge SA 5253. The South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board and the Government of South Australia, their employees and their servants do not warrant, or make any representation, regarding the use or results of the information contain herein as to its correctness, accuracy, currency or otherwise. The South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board and the Government of South Australia, their employees and their servants expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice herein. Aboriginal Cultural Knowledge No authority is provided by First Peoples of the River Murray and Mallee, Peramangk and Ngarrindjeri nations for the use of their cultural knowledge contained in this document without their prior written consent. ii Water Allocation Plan FOR THE RIVER MURRAY PRESCRIBED WATERCOURSE iii iv v Acknowledgement The South Australian Government acknowledges and respects Aboriginal people as the state’s first peoples and nations, and recognises Aboriginal people as traditional owners and occupants of land and waters in South Australia. Aboriginal peoples’ spiritual, social, cultural and economic practices come from their lands and waters, and they continue to maintain their cultural heritage, economies, languages and laws which are of ongoing importance. -
Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Management Plan
Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Management Plan This plan of management has been prepared and adopted in pursuance of Section 38 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, Australia Department for Environment and Heritage, 2004 ISBN: 0 75901076 5 Final Edited by staff of Mallee District and Reserve Planning Department for Environment and Heritage Cartography by Reserve Planning and Benno Curth Cover photo clockwise from top left: Silvery phebalium Phabalium bullatum, Little Pygmy Possum Cercartetus lepidus on Leptospermum spp, Silver Goodenia Goodenia willisiana, Mallee Heath, Wallowa Acacia calamifolia, Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata, Mallee Heath and Western Blutongue Tiliqua occipitalis. This document may be cited as ‘Department for Environment and Heritage (2004) Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Management Plan, Adelaide, South Australia’ FIS 17148 •Feb 2004 Department for Environment and Heritage Ngarkat Complex of Conservation Parks Incorporating Ngarkat, Mt Rescue, Mt Shaugh and Scorpion Springs Conservation Parks Management Plan March 2004 Our Parks, Our Heritage, Our Legacy Cultural richness and diversity are the marks of a great society. It is these qualities that are basic to our humanity. They are the foundation of our value systems and drive our quest for purpose and contentment. Cultural richness embodies morality, spiritual well-being, the rule of law, reverence for life, human achievement, creativity and talent, options for choice, a sense of belonging, personal worth and an acceptance of responsibility for the future. Biological richness and diversity are, in turn, important to cultural richness and communities of people. When a community ceases to value and protect its natural landscapes, it erodes the richness and wholeness of its cultural foundation.