President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 Date Met with... Country/Organization Meeting Location Occasion Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 1, 1992 Prime Minister Paul J. Keating Australia Sydney, Australia Official Visit New South Wales, Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 1, 1992 Premier Nicholas Greiner Sydney, Australia Australia Luncheon Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 1, 1992 Governor-General Bill Hayden Australia Canberra, Australia Official Visit and State Dinner Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 2, 1992 Prime Minister Paul J. Keating Australia Canberra, Australia Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 2, 1992 Representatives of Rural Organizations Australia Canberra, Australia Discuss U.S. Subsidization of Wheat Sales Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 2, 1992 Prime Minister Paul J. Keating Australia Canberra, Australia Business Delegation Meeting Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 2, 1992 Prime Minister Paul J. Keating Australia Canberra, Australia Working Luncheon Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 2, 1991 Former Prime Minister Robert Hawke Australia Canberra, Australia Private Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 2, 1991 Prime Minister Paul J. Keating Australia Canberra, Australia Reception and State Dinner 1 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 3, 1991 Business Leaders Australia Melbourne, Australia Roundtable Meeting Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 3, 1991 Premier Joan Kirner Victoria, Australia Melbourne, Australia Luncheon for Community Leaders Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 4, 1992 President Wee Kim Wee Singapore Singapore Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 4, 1992 Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong Singapore Singapore Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 4, 1992 Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong Singapore Singapore Business Roundtable Luncheon Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 4, 1992 Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew Singapore Singapore Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 4, 1992 President Wee Kim Wee Singapore Singapore State Dinner Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 5, 1992 Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Ambassadors ASEAN Singapore Coffee Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 5, 1992 President Roh Tae Woo Republic of Korea Seoul, South Korea Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 5, 1992 President Roh Tae Woo Republic of Korea Seoul, South Korea Private Dinner 2 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 6, 1992 Officials from Korean Business Groups Republic of Korea Seoul, South Korea Working Breakfast Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 6, 1992 President Roh Tae Woo Republic of Korea Seoul, South Korea Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 6, 1992 President Roh Tae Woo Republic of Korea Seoul, South Korea State Dinner Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 7, 1992 Former Prime Minister Toshiki Kaifu Japan Kyoto, Japan Reception and Luncheon Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 8, 1992 Emperor Akihito and Empress Michkiko Japan Tokyo, Japan Courtesy Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 8, 1992 Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa Japan Tokyo, Japan Official Visit Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 8, 1992 Prime Minister Kiichi Mayazawa Japan Tokyo, Japan Working Luncheon Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 8, 1992 Emperor Akihito and Crown Prince Japan Tokyo, Japan Tennis Match Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— State Dinner (President Bush Fell ill January 8, 1992 Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa Japan Tokyo, Japan During Dinner and Was Diagnosed as Having a Case of Intestinal Flu) Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 9, 1992 Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa Japan Tokyo, Japan Official Visit 3 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 9, 1992 Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko Japan Tokyo, Japan Cocktail Reception and State Dinner Trip to Asian and Pacific Nations— January 10, 1992 Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko Japan Tokyo, Japan Farewell Visit January 13, 1992 President Mário Soares Portugal Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 21, 1992 Permanent Representative Abdullah Salah Jordan Washington, D.C. Official Visit Luncheon Participants in Meeting vis-à-vis International Conference on Humanitarian January 22, 1992 ICHACIS Washington, D.C. Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent States (ICHACIS) (Hosted by Secretary of State James A. Baker III) Official Visit January 22, 1992 Foreign Minister Michio Watanabe Japan Washington, D.C. (Signing Ceremony for U.S.-Japan Computer Trade Agreement) U.N. Function—Photo Opportunity January 30, 1992 Prime Minister Carlos Veiga Cape Verde New York, New York and Bilateral Meeting January 30, 1992 Chancellor Franz Vranitzky Austria New York, New York U.N. Function—Photo Opportunity January 30, 1992 Prime Minister Wilfried Martens Belgium New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting January 30, 1992 King Hassan II Morocco New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting 4 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 January 30, 1992 Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa Japan New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting January 30, 1992 Prime Minister John Major United Kingdom New York, New York and Private Dinner January 31, 1992 President Carlos Andrés Pérez Venezuela New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting January 31, 1992 Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao India New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting January 31, 1992 President Francois Mitterrand France New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting Heads of State January 31, 1992 New York, New York U.N. Function—Luncheon (Including Major, Perez, Miyazawa, Mitterrand, Boris N. Yeltsin, and Others) January 1, 1992 Premier Li Peng China New York, New York U.N. Function—Bilateral Meeting February 2, 1992 President Boris N. Yeltsin Russian Federation Camp David, Maryland Summit Meeting—Official Visit February 2, 1992 President Boris N. Yeltsin Russian Federation Camp David, Maryland Summit Meeting—Luncheon February 3, 1992 President Ronald R. Venetiaan Suriname Washington, D.C. Official Visit 5 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 February 10, 1992 President Rene Felber Switzerland Washington, D.C. Official Visit February 11, 1992 Prime Minister Suleyman Demirel Turkey Washington, D.C. Official Visit February 11, 1992 Prime Minister Suleyman Demirel Turkey Washington, D.C. Working Luncheon February 18, 1992 President Mircea Snegur Moldova Washington, D.C. Official Visit February 19, 1992 President Frederick Chiluba Zambia Washington, D.C. Official Visit February 20, 1992 Prime Minister Carl Bildt Sweden Washington, D.C. Official Visit February 20, 1992 Prime Minister Carl Bildt Sweden Washington, D.C. Working Luncheon February 24, 1992 President Alfredo Cristiani El Salvador Washington, D.C. Private Visit Drug Summit Conference—Bilateral February 26, 1992 President Alberto Kenyo Fujimori Peru San Antonio, Texas Meeting Drug Summit Conference—Bilateral February 26, 1992 President César Gaviria Trujillo Colombia San Antonio, Texas Meeting 6 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 Drug Summit Conference—Bilateral February 26, 1992 President Rodrigo Borja Cevallos Ecuador San Antonio, Texas Meeting Drug Summit Conference—Bilateral February 26, 1992 President Jaime Paz Zamora Bolivia San Antonio, Texas Meeting Drug Summit Conference—State February 26, 1992 Heads of Delegations San Antonio, Texas Dinner Drug Summit Conference—Photo February 27, 1992 President Carlos Salinas de Gortari Mexico San Antonio, Texas Opportunity and Working Breakfast Drug Summit Conference—Photo February 27, 1992 Minister of Foreign Relations Armando Durán Venezuela San Antonio, Texas Opportunity First Plenary Session of Drug February 27, 1992 Heads of Delegations San Antonio, Texas Summit Conference Drug Summit Conference—Working February 27, 1992 Heads of Delegations San Antonio, Texas Luncheon Second Plenary Session of Drug February 27, 1992 Heads of Delegations San Antonio, Texas Summit March 3, 1992 Prime Minister Filip Dimitrov Bulgaria Washington, D.C. Official Visit March 10, 1992 Chief Rabbi of the Ashkenazim Avraham Shapira Israel Washington, D.C. Official Visit 7 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1992 March 12, 1992 King Hussein I Jordan Washington, D.C. Official Visit March 12, 1992 King Hussein I Jordan Washington, D.C. Working Luncheon President Bush Signed Book of Condolences Upon Death of March 12, 1992 Israeli Embassy Staff Israel Washington, D.C. Former Prime Minister Menachem Begin March 17, 1992 Minister of Foreign Affairs David Andrews Ireland Washington, D.C. Official Visit March 19, 1992 Prime Minister Khaleda Zia ur-Rahman Bangladesh Washington, D.C. Official Visit and Photo Opportunity March 21, 1992 Chancellor Helmut Kohl Germany Camp David, Maryland Bilateral Meeting March 21, 1992 Chancellor Helmut Kohl Germany Camp David, Maryland Working Luncheon March 22, 1992 Chancellor Helmut Kohl Germany Camp David, Maryland Lunch March 24, 1992 Prime Minister Michael Manley Jamaica Washington, D.C. Private Dinner March 25, 1992 Ambassador of Russian Federation to the U.S. Vladimir Lukin Russian Federation
Recommended publications
  • CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 86, 25 July 2016 2
    No. 86 25 July 2016 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html TURKISH SOCIETAL ACTORS IN THE CAUCASUS Special Editors: Andrea Weiss and Yana Zabanova ■■Introduction by the Special Editors 2 ■■Track Two Diplomacy between Armenia and Turkey: Achievements and Limitations 3 By Vahram Ter-Matevosyan, Yerevan ■■How Non-Governmental Are Civil Societal Relations Between Turkey and Azerbaijan? 6 By Hülya Demirdirek and Orhan Gafarlı, Ankara ■■Turkey’s Abkhaz Diaspora as an Intermediary Between Turkish and Abkhaz Societies 9 By Yana Zabanova, Berlin ■■Turkish Georgians: The Forgotten Diaspora, Religion and Social Ties 13 By Andrea Weiss, Berlin ■■CHRONICLE From 14 June to 19 July 2016 16 Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 86, 25 July 2016 2 Introduction by the Special Editors Turkey is an important actor in the South Caucasus in several respects: as a leading trade and investment partner, an energy hub, and a security actor. While the economic and security dimensions of Turkey’s role in the region have been amply addressed, its cross-border ties with societies in the Caucasus remain under-researched. This issue of the Cauca- sus Analytical Digest illustrates inter-societal relations between Turkey and the three South Caucasus states of Arme- nia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, as well as with the de-facto state of Abkhazia, through the prism of NGO and diaspora contacts. Although this approach is by necessity selective, each of the four articles describes an important segment of transboundary societal relations between Turkey and the Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish President Turgut Özal's Impact on Nursultan
    TURKISH PRESIDENT TURGUT ÖZAL’S IMPACT ON NURSULTAN NAZARBAYEV’S PERCEPTION OF TURKEY* Nursultan Nazarbayev'ın Türkiye Algısına Tugut Özal'ın Etkisi Din Muhammed AMETBEK** Abstract Nursultan Nazarbayev as the founding President of Kazakhstan played a determinant role in the formation of Kazakh foreign policy. In this respect, the article examines Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey as a decision maker in foreign policy are based on observation rather than realities. Nazarbayev is aware of the fact that the national identity of Kazakhstan is divided between two competing poles; Russian and Kazakh, in a broader sense; Slavic and Turkic. From this perspective, Nazarbayev’s perception of Turkey is significant as it is not only related to foreign policy but at the same time the national identity of Kazakhstan. The study argues that the President of Republic of Turkey of early 1990s Turgut Özal with his active diplomacy towards Kazakhstan contributed to the positive image of Turkey. The research concludes that close and reliable relations between Nazarbayev and Özal became the basis of a strategic part- nership between Kazakhstan and Turkey. Keywords: Turgut Özal, Nursultan Nazarbayev, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Perception, National Identity Özet Kazakistan’ın kurucu Cumhurbaşkanı Nursultan Nazarbayev’in, Kazak dış politi- kasının oluşumunda belirleyici rol üstlendiği kesindir. Bu bağlamda, makale, Nazarba- yev’in Türkiye algısını ele almaktadır. Çünkü inşacı ekolün iddiasına dış politika kararları gerçeklere değil algı üzerine alınmaktadır. Nazarbayev Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliğinin Rus ve Kazak olarak, daha geniş kapsamda Slav ve Türk olarak yarışan iki kutba ayrıldığının farkındadır. Buradan hareketle, Nazarbayev’in Türkiye algısı, yal- nızca dış politika açısından değil aynı zamanda Kazakistan’ın ulusal kimliği açısından da önemlidir.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuania Country Chapter
    EU Coalition Explorer Results of the EU28 Survey on coalition building in the European Union an initiative of Results for Lithuania © ECFR May 2017 Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners Policies ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer Findings Lithuania Coalition Potential Preferences Policies Ranks 1 to 14 Top 3 for LT Ranks 15 to 28 Lithuania ranks overall #21 at Preferences Lithuania ranks #11 at ‘More Europe’ Top 3 for LT 1. Latvia 2. Estonia Country Findings 1. Latvia #11 3. CZ EL AT Austria #19 Q1 Most Contacted 2. Estonia Q14 Deeper Integration BE Belgium 3. Poland BG Bulgaria 1. Latvia Q16 Expert View Level of Decision-Making Q17 Public View HR Croatia #22 Q2 Shared Interests 2. Poland 3. Sweden CY Cyprus 63% 52% All EU member states 50% 46% CZ Czech Rep. 1. Latvia 13% 19% Legally bound core 14% 18% DK Denmark #22 Q3 Most Responsive 2. Sweden 17% 15% Coalition of states 14% 21% EE Estonia 3. Slovenia 7% 8% Only national level 22% 15% FI Finland LT EU EU LT FR France DE Germany EL Greece HU Hungary Partners Networks IE Ireland Lithuania ranks overall #20 at Partners Voting for IT Italy Top 3 for LT Latvia LV Lithuania Latvia 1. Latvia Top 8 for LT LT Lithuania #19 Q10 Foreign and Development Policy 2. Poland Poland LU Luxembourg 3. Sweden MT Malta Estonia 1. Latvia NL Netherlands #12 Q11 Security and Defense Policy 2. HR RO PL Poland 3. DK PL SE Sweden PT Portugal LT 1. Estonia RO Romania #21 Q12 Economic and Social Policy 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Lithuanian Economic Review
    Lithuanian Economic Review 2019 MARCH 1 LITHUANIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW ISSN 2029-8471 (online) MARCH 2019 The Lithuanian Economic Review analyses the developments of the real sector, prices, public finance and credit in Lithuania, as well as the projected development of the domestic economy. The material presented in the review is the result of statistical data analysis, modelling and expert assessment. The review is prepared by the Bank of Lithuania. The cut-off date for the data used in the Lithuanian Economic Review was 1 March 2019. The Bank of Lithuania macroeconomic projections are based on external assumptions, constructed using information made available by 12 February 2019, and other information made available by 1 March 2019. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. © Lietuvos bankas Gedimino pr. 6, LT-01103 Vilnius www.lb.lt 2 CONTENTS LITHUANIA’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OUTLOOK ........................................................... 6 I. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................... 9 Box 1. Potential impact of the US tariffs on car imports from the EU on the Lithuanian economy ......................................................................................................................... 12 II. MONETARY POLICY OF THE EUROSYSTEM .......................................................................... 14 III. REAL SECTOR ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turgut Özal Twenty Years After: the Man and the Politician
    COMMENTARY TURGUT ÖZAL TWENTY YEARS AFTER: THE MAN AND THE POLITICIAN Turgut Özal Twenty Years After: The Man and the Politician CENGİZ ÇANDAR* ABSTRACT Whether Turgut Özal was a good politician remains up for debate. However, there is no question that he indeed was (and is) a significant historical persona. He guided his country into the twenty-first century. When Özal suddenly passed away in 1993, he had already led Turkey to the next century, even though the twenty-first century would technically begin only seven years later. mong the numerous com- political skills. In particular, he held mentaries published following in high regard Sultan Abdulhamid II, ATurgut Özal’s death, it was the an Ottoman sultan of the last period following remark that struck me the of the Empire of equally high caliber. hardest: “Turgut Bey was not a good I remember his expressed admiration politician. For he was a good man.” for Mehmed the Conqueror, Selim I, Suleiman the Magnificient, Murad II This was the most striking assessment and Bayezid II, whom he would refer to me because it was his qualities as a to with a facial expression overshad- good man that marked me in our fre- owed by a sense of inadequacy and quent encounters over the final two modesty: “What kind of men were years of his life. Turgut Özal was an they? How did they rule over such extremely courageous man, who did vast lands and such a diverse popu- not seem to posess the supposedly lation? Look at us, and look at them!” * Journalist, indispensable qualities of any good and a former adviser to politician: ruthlessness and the killing The people he talked about were rul- President instinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: a Political and Economic Analysis
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Vol. 5, No. 1, 2015, pp.27-44 ISSN: 2146-4553 www.econjournals.com Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: A Political and Economic Analysis Cagla Gul YESEVI Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul Kültür University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected] Burcu Yavuz TIFTIKCIGIL Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Gedik University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: It is now widely recognized that Turkey-Azerbaijan relations have always been strong and described with the phrase "one nation with two states”. This paper is concerned with economic and political nature of Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Initially, the evolution of Turkish- Azerbaijani relations after the independence of Azerbaijan has been examined. This paper gives an overview of the impacts of Nagorno-Karabagh issue and efforts to normalize the relations between Turkey and Armenia on relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Energy has a special place in the relationship between the two countries. Azerbaijan’s economy, energy sectors of Azerbaijan and Turkey has been assessed. Moreover, this paper gives a comparative analysis on economic relationship between Turkey and Azerbaijan. This study finally discusses the main trends and contributions of energy projects on Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Keywords: Turkey; Azerbaijan; Politics; Economy; Energy JEL Classifications: O57; Q41; Q43; Q48 1. Introduction Turkey has distanced itself from the Turkic people of Soviet Union, with whom it has ethnic and language affiliations, since its establishment. The primary aim was determined as the prevention of the spread of communism within the country and Turanist movements were not supported.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Caucasus: Where the Us and Turkey Succeeded Together
    THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: WHERE THE US AND TURKEY SUCCEEDED TOGETHER As Americans and Turks discuss the ups and downs in their relationship, the strategically important South Caucasus is one area, where, working together, Turkey and the United States have helped bring about historic changes. More can be done to realize the region’s promise should the US and Turkey deepen their partnership with Azerbaijan and Georgia and build on the policies that have proven to be successful. This success has been based on forward-looking pragmatism and recognition of common interests. Acknowledging the achievements in the South Caucasus and learning from them can contribute to future progress in the US-Turkey relationship. Elin Suleymanov∗ ∗ Elin Suleymanov is Senior Counselor with the Government of Azerbaijan. The views and opinions are his own and do not imply an endorsement by the employer. ormerly a Soviet backyard, the South Caucasus is increasingly emerging as a vital part of the extended European space. Sandwiched between the Black and the Caspian seas, the Caucasus F also stands as a key juncture of Eurasia. Living up to its historic reputation, the South Caucasus, especially the Republic of Azerbaijan, is now literally at the crossroads of the East-West and North – South transport corridors. Additionally, the Caucasus has been included concurrently into a rather vague “European Neighborhood” and an even vaguer “Greater Middle East.” This represents both the world’s growing realization of the region’s importance and the lack of a clear immediate plan to address the rising significance of the Caucasus. Not that the Caucasus has lacked visionaries.
    [Show full text]
  • ITC by Country Report
    ITC by Country Report Lithuania 05/12/2014 ITC by country - Lithuania 1 Table of Contents 1. Country / Territory Brief 2. People and Economy 2.1 People 2.2 Economy 3. Trade Performance 3.1 General Trade Performance 3.2 Sector Trade Performance 4. Trade Strategy and Policy 4.1 Trade and Development Strategies 4.2 Domestic and Foreign Market Access 4.3 Trade Facilitation 4.4 Business and Regulatory Environment 4.5 Infrastructure 5. ITC and the Country/Territory 5.1 ITC Projects 5.2 Events 5.3 ITC Contacts 6. Trade Information Sources and Contacts 6.1 Trade Information Sources 6.2 Trade Contacts This is a pdf version of the captioned country contents in the intracen web site of the International Trade Centre. This document was generated on 05.12.2014. For the latest information about ITC's work and the country, please refer to www.intracen.org © International Trade Centre 2014 ITC encourages the reprinting and translation of its publications to achieve wider dissemination. Short extracts of this document may be freely reproduced, with due acknowledgement of the source. Permission should be requested for more extensive reproduction or translation. A copy of the reprinted or translated material should be sent to ITC. ITC by country - Lithuania 2 1. Country / Territory Brief ITC aims to assist Lithuania in creating sustainable trade linkages with the developing world by sourcing good quality products from these growing export markets. This page contains trade performance and investment data as well as highly innovative trade flow trends and analysis specially developed by ITC.
    [Show full text]
  • To My Father, Nüsret SADIGBEYLİ
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository To my father, Nüsret SADIGBEYLÝ STABILITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: THE ROLE OF RUSSIA AND TURKEY THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES OF BILKENT UNIVERSITY BY ROVSHAN SADIGBEYLI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA AUGUST 2002 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Prof. Dr. ALİ L. KARAOSMANOĞLU Thesis Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Assistant Prof. GÜLGÜN TUNA Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Dr. AYLİN GÜNEY Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. KÜRŞAT AYDOĞAN Director ABSTRACT STABILITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: THE ROLE OF RUSSIA AND TURKEY Rovshan SADIGBEYLI M.A., International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ali L. Karaosmanoğlu August 2002 Numerous ethnic and territorial conflicts that re-emerged after the demise of the Soviet Union are the primary factors that beset the long-term stability in the post-Soviet space and particularly in the South Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of These Values Relate Not to Sovereign States but to the Individual Human Beings Who Are Their Constituent Members
    Opening Address Gaishi Hiraiwa Prime Minister Obuchi, Dr. Boutros-Ghali, ladies and gentlemen. As chairman of the Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA), I take pleasure in addressing you on the opening of this symposium commemorating the fortieth anni- versary of JIIA. JIIA was established in December 1959 on the initiative of Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida to conduct wide-ranging research and surveys in fields related to international affairs and diplomacy. Its aims were “to create a major research facility in cooperation with academe, the bureaucracy, politics, business, the press, and other spheres, and prepare a system for empirical research oriented toward advancing our new democratic diplomacy.” Thus it was established on the basis of the consensus of opinion leaders in a variety of fields. In the 40 years since then, JIIA, true to the spirit of its founders, has expanded its fields of activity in response to international trends and changes. With the recent rise of so-called track-two diplomacy, JIIA, as a leading Japanese think tank, prides itself on having made significant contributions to the formulation of Japanese foreign policy. With the cooperation of Dr. Hans van Ginkel, rector of United Nations University, and others at UNU, we have organized this symposium on the theme “In Quest of Human Security.” During this symposium, we will have the opportunity to hear the valuable opinions, informed by penetrating insight, of eminent authorities from both Japan and overseas as they discuss measures for conflict prevention, promotion of sus- tainable development, and enhancement of human dignity—all core issues of human security.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Union Responses to Globalization in Lithuania
    Discussion papers DP/111/1999 Trade union responses to globalization Labour in Lithuania and Society Programme Roma Dovydeniene P.O. Box 6 CH-1211 Geneva 22 Tel.004122/7998496 Fax. 004122/7998542 E-mail: [email protected] The International Institute for Labour Studies was established in 1960 as an autonomous facility of the International Labour Organization (ILO). Its mandate is to promote policy research and public discussion on emerging issues of concern to the ILO and its constituents labour, business and government. The Labour and Society Programme examines the outlook for labour at the beginning of the new millennium in the light of changes at the workplace and in society at large. Focusing initially on organized labour, the programme seeks to identify approaches and strategies to enhance the profile of labour as a major actor in civil society, and as a contributor to dynamic and equitable growth. Specifically, the programme will review the changing environment of labour and unions; document trade union responses to these changes; highlight promising approaches for trade unions in civil society and the global economy in future; and outline the type of policy and institutional environment required for the growth of free and effective trade unions. This work is undertaken in close collaboration with international and national trade union organizations and international trade secretariats, and will be implemented through networks consisting of trade union practitioners, academics, research institutes and other policymakers. These networks, both international and regional, will also be a means of disseminating research outcomes to a wider audience. The Discussion Paper Series presents the preliminary results of research undertaken by the IILS.
    [Show full text]