DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This Issue -1- FEED MY SHEEP PUBLISHED BY JAMES W. BRUGGEMAN STONE KINGDOM MINISTRIES P. O. BOX 5695 ASHEVILLE, NC 28813 U.S.A. www.stonekingdom.org Issue #102 May 2007 No Fatalism Here! e have been studying the character of David and ing David. David restrained his commandos from W Saul for these many months, and although King eliminating this threat because David sensed God Saul has long been removed from the scene, we have speaking through this enemy. Remember that? Are we discovered that David’s own son, Absalom, is of the learning to hear God speak through our enemies? Can same spirit as Saul. Thus, in our understanding of the we see those enemies, in the final analysis, as being types and shadows in the life of David, we recognize for our good? That should be one of the goals of any Absalom as another Saul type. prospective overcomer. When we left off last time, Absalom had con- David and his sizeable entourage made it spired with Ahithophel to effect a coup d’état, to topple through Shimei’s gauntlet and came to a place of rest, David from the throne and take it for himself. When probably right on the west bank of the Jordan river. King David in Jerusalem got word that Absalom had amassed an army and was on his way to Jerusalem, 2 Samuel 16:13 And as David and his men David let it be known that any and all who wished to went by the way, Shimei went along on the hill’s join him as he left Jerusalem were welcome to do so. side over against him, and cursed as he went, and threw stones at him, and cast dust. As they were in the Kidron Valley and later on the 14 And the king, and all the people that were mount of Olives, David took several steps to try to with him, came weary, and refreshed themselves thwart the plans of his rebellious son. He told the co- there. high priests, Zadok and Abiathar, to return to Jerusalem 15 And Absalom, and all the people the men with the ark of the covenant. He told them that they of Israel, came to Jerusalem, and Ahithophel with could be his eyes and ears in the capital, and that they him. should use their respective sons, Ahimaaz and Jona- than, as couriers to bring reports to David. When Absalom and his fellow conspirators came riding into Jerusalem, there were some—perhaps Then, David also sent his good friend and trusted many—people who cast their lot with Absalom, and counselor, Hushai the Archite, back to Jerusalem. He of course, would have welcomed him as a liberator. instructed him to try to get close to Absalom and learn Among the cheering crowds would have been the two whatever intelligence he could. Hushai was to relay the high priests—their sons remained outside of town— intel to either of the high priests who would then send it and also helping line the parade route was David’s back to David through their sons as couriers. other undercover agent, Hushai. Finally, as David and his “Delta forces” are mak- 16 And it came to pass, when Hushai the Archite, ing their way through the territory of Benjamin (Saul’s David’s friend, was come unto Absalom, that Hushai said tribe), one of Saul’s loyalists named Shimei began ston- unto Absalom, God save the king, God save the king. -2- Hushai plays the role of the spy, pretending that Hushai be an undercover agent to work to over- great friendship and loyalty to the new king. But Ab- throw the rebel Absalom. salom is little suspicious at first and it takes a bit of play-acting and clever talking by Hushai to persuade The principle here that we must fully understand him otherwise. is that no matter what happens in our lives, we can always choose how to react. We must never allow 17 And Absalom said to Hushai, Is this thy laziness or apathy or fatalism to set in and become our kindness to thy friend? why wentest thou not with mode of life. God gives us minds with great capabili- thy friend? ties and He expects us to use them. In this case, both 18 And Hushai said unto Absalom, Nay; but David and Hushai could have taken the fatalistic atti- whom the LORD, and this people, and all the men tude that [in a whiney voice] “Well, Absalom seems to of Israel, choose, his will I be, and with him will I have the upper hand here. I guess that means that my abide. reign as king is over. I guess I will just sit here and 19 And again, whom should I serve? should I wait for him to come assassinate me because it’s obvi- not serve in the presence of his son? as I have ous that this is God’s sovereign plan.” Boo hoo hoo. served in thy father’s presence, so will I be in thy presence. No, David did not think like that. He believed fully in the sovereignty of God, but because he really We notice that Hushai’s first response to Absa- did not know what the outcome of Absalom’s rebel- lom’s questioning of his loyalty is to proclaim that lion was going to be, from his perspective, he was free “Well, David has fled; and you’re here; and therefore to choose how to react. So he was decisive and chose it is obvious that Yahweh has chosen you to be king to send some undercover spies back to Jerusalem and now.” This is another lesson in how God’s sover- to fight for his throne. eignty works. It follows naturally on the similar point we made in a previous FMS, the point about the rela- God indeed controls every detail of everyone’s tionship between God’s sovereignty and fatalism life from beginning to end, but the beauty of it, the among Christians, or stated another way: it’s about the utterly dazzling brilliance of the Father is that He does relationship between God’s sovereignty and apathetic not let us know the future. Therefore, what is from His attitudes on the part of believers. point of view the illusion of free will, is from our point of view and for all practical purposes, the appar- Just as an aside, we all understand how people ent reality of free will. This is why David was not a who believe in an any-moment-now rapture of all be- fatalist. Let me repeat the key verses from our previ- lievers can easily develop a do-nothing and an apa- ous message. thetic attitude. But this is also a pitfall for those of us who believe in God’s absolute sovereignty. In the 2 Samuel 15: 25 And the king said unto situation in the narrative here, I see it like this: God Zadok, Carry back the ark of God into the city: if I indeed controls everything, down to the tiniest detail; shall find favour in the eyes of the LORD, he will and while we can truthfully state that whatever hap- bring me again, and show me both it, and his habi- pens was meant to happen, that does not mean that we tation: must be passive on-lookers to everything that hap- 26 But if he thus say, I have no delight in pens. That is the Oriental philosophy of fatalism. thee; behold, here am I, let him do to me as seem- eth good unto him. You see, Hushai’s clever statements were meant to deceive Absalom by causing him to think that You see, David did not know the future, and so Hushai was a fatalist; i.e., that Hushai had the idea for all practical purposes, from his perspective, he had that “Well, if you’re here and David’s gone, then ob- free will to choose… to either roll over and die, … or viously, God meant for you to be king. And my job is to use all his talents and resources to prevent the suc- to serve the king.” This satisfies Absalom. He lets cess of Absalom’s attempted coup d’état. Therefore, he Hushai take his seat among his inner circle of counsel- fled Jerusalem. Therefore, he sent Zadok and Abiathar ors. But what Absalom did not know was that while back with the ark with instructions to set up an intelli- Hushai did believe that God had ordained this event, gence network. Therefore, he sent Hushai back to Jeru- Hushai also believed that God’s sovereignty ordained salem also, as his point man in Absalom’s inner circle. Feed My Sheep #102 May 2007 Stone Kingdom Ministries, P.O. Box 5695, Asheville, NC 28813 -3- Of course, he did not know if Hushai would be was equally self-serving because David, being the successful in being accepted in Absalom’s inner cir- kind of character that he was, there was always the cle. If he failed to penetrate it, David would accept possibility that somehow David would find it in his that failure as God’s plan. But then the same choice heart to forgive Absalom, and then Ahithophel might would confront David again: does he then roll over not fare as well. He might be the one executed as the and die, or does he use his mind to try to come up mastermind of the whole conspiracy—which he may with another means to thwart Absalom’s plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thank You So Much for the Opportunity to Share with You This Morning from the Word of God
    II Samuel 16:5-14 Dealin' with Dead Dogs Licking Valley Church of Christ January 31, 2021 Thank you so much for the opportunity to share with you this morning from the Word of God. I count it a privilege to know and minister alongside your minister, Gus. Gus and I started out in Bible college together back in 1975. He and his roommate, Jay lived on the 2nd floor right above Kevin Mack and me. We would communicate with each other - either by them stomping on the floor or us banging on the ceiling. That would signify that it was time to open our windows and to look up or down while conversing. I don't care to remember all of the gory details, but there was a time when I believe I indicated that I wanted to visit them up in their room. "Come on up!" They invited. Like a dummy, I reached up my hands through our window stretching up toward theirs. They actually agreed to my non-verbal request by pulling me up to their 2nd story dorm room and I ascended without the use of steps! Our relationship has toned down considerably over the years. I appreciate so much Gus's love for the Lord and His people. His ministry here has been an encouragement, not only to the folks of this congregation, but to so many others of us. I also appreciate your theme for the beginning of this year: Goliath Must Fall - Winning the Battle Against Your Giants. I've listened to a couple of sermons from the series and also watched this week's Louie Giglio episode that some of your small groups are using.
    [Show full text]
  • Zechariah 9–14 and the Continuation of Zechariah During the Ptolemaic Period
    Journal of Hebrew Scriptures Volume 13, Article 9 DOI:10.5508/jhs.2013.v13.a9 Zechariah 9–14 and the Continuation of Zechariah during the Ptolemaic Period HERVÉ GONZALEZ Articles in JHS are being indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, RAMBI, and BiBIL. Their abstracts appear in Religious and Theological Abstracts. The journal is archived by Library and Archives Canada and is accessible for consultation and research at the Electronic Collection site maintained by Library and Archives Canada. ISSN 1203L1542 http://www.jhsonline.org and http://purl.org/jhs ZECHARIAH 9–14 AND THE CONTINUATION OF ZECHARIAH DURING THE PTOLEMAIC PERIOD HERVÉ GONZALEZ UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE INTRODUCTION This article seeks to identify the sociohistorical factors that led to the addition of chs. 9–14 to the book of Zechariah.1 It accepts the classical scholarly hypothesis that Zech 1–8 and Zech 9–14 are of different origins and Zech 9–14 is the latest section of the book.2 Despite a significant consensus on this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 The article presents the preliminary results of a larger work currently underway at the University of Lausanne regarding war in Zech 9–14. I am grateful to my colleagues Julia Rhyder and Jan Rückl for their helpful comments on previous versions of this article. 2 Scholars usually assume that Zech 1–8 was complete when chs. 9–14 were added to the book of Zechariah, and I will assume the sameT see for instance E. Bosshard and R. G. Kratz, “Maleachi im Zwölfprophetenbuch,” BN 52 (1990), 27–46 (41–45)T O. H.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Zechariah 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on Zechariah 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE AND WRITER The title of this book comes from its traditional writer, as is true of all the prophetical books of the Old Testament. The name "Zechariah" (lit. "Yahweh Remembers") was a common one among the Israelites, which identified at least 27 different individuals in the Old Testament, perhaps 30.1 It was an appropriate name for the writer of this book, because it explains that Yahweh remembers His chosen people, and His promises, and will be faithful to them. This Zechariah was the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo (1:1, 7; cf. Ezra 5:1; 6:14; Neh. 12:4, 16). Zechariah, like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, was both a prophet and a priest. He was obviously familiar with priestly things (cf. ch. 3; 6:9-15; 9:8, 15; 14:16, 20, 21). Since he was a young man (Heb. na'ar) when he began prophesying (2:4), he was probably born in Babylonian captivity and returned to Palestine very early in life, in 536 B.C. with Zerubbabel and Joshua. Zechariah apparently survived Joshua, the high priest, since he became the head of his own division of priests in the days of Joiakim, the son of Joshua (Neh. 12:12, 16). Zechariah became a leading priest in the restoration community succeeding his grandfather (or ancestor), Iddo, who also returned from captivity in 536 B.C., as the leader of his priestly family (Neh. 12:4, 16). Zechariah's father, Berechiah (1:1, 7), evidently never became prominent.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 So Moses and Aaron Went to Pharaoh and Did Just As the Lord Commanded
    Today’s Scripture Reading Exodus 6:14-7:13 14 These are the heads of their fathers' houses: the sons of Reuben, the firstborn of Israel: Hanoch, Pallu, Hezron, and Carmi; these are the clans of Reuben. 15 The sons of Simeon: Jemuel, Jamin, Ohad, Jachin, Zohar, and Shaul, the son of a Canaanite woman; these are the clans of Simeon. 16 These are the names of the sons of Levi according to their generations: Gershon, Kohath, and Merari, the years of the life of Levi being 137 years. 17 The sons of Gershon: Libni and Shimei, by their clans. 18 The sons of Kohath: Amram, Izhar, Hebron, and Uzziel, the years of the life of Kohath being 133 years. ! 6:14-7:13 19 The sons of Merari: Mahli and Mushi. These are the clans of the Levites according to their generations. 20 Amram took as his wife Jochebed his father's sister, and she bore him Aaron and Moses, the years of the life of Amram being 137 years. 21 The sons of Izhar: Korah, Nepheg, and Zichri. 22 The sons of Uzziel: Mishael, Elzaphan, and Sithri. 23 Aaron took as his wife Elisheba, the daughter of Amminadab and the sister of Nahshon, and she bore him Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar, and Ithamar. 24 The sons of Korah: Assir, Elkanah, and Abiasaph; these are the clans of the Korahites. ! 6:14-7:13 25 Eleazar, Aaron's son, took as his wife one of the daughters of Putiel, and she bore him Phinehas. These are the heads of the fathers' houses of the Levites by their clans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of David's Kingship at Hebron: an Exegetical and Theological Study of 2 Samuel 2:1-5:5
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2019 The Nature of David's Kingship at Hebron: An Exegetical and Theological Study of 2 Samuel 2:1-5:5 Christian Vogel Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Vogel, Christian, "The Nature of David's Kingship at Hebron: An Exegetical and Theological Study of 2 Samuel 2:1-5:5" (2019). Dissertations. 1684. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1684 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE NATURE OF DAVID’S KINGSHIP AT HEBRON: AN EXEGETICAL AND THEOLOGICAL STUDY OF 2 SAMUEL 2:1—5:5 by Christian Vogel Adviser: Richard M. Davidson ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE NATURE OF DAVID’S KINGSHIP AT HEBRON: AN EXEGETICAL AND THEOLOGICAL STUDY OF 2 SAMUEL 2:1—5:5 Name of researcher: Christian Vogel Name and degree of faculty adviser: Richard M. Davidson, Ph.D. Date completed: June 2019 The account of David’s reign at Hebron found in 2 Samuel 2:1—5:5 constitutes a somewhat neglected, yet crucial part of the David narrative, chronicling David’s first years as king. This dissertation investigates these chapters by means of a close reading of the Hebrew text in order to gain a better understanding of the nature of David’s kingship as it is presented in this literary unit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronology of the Events in Zechariah 12-14
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Honors Theses Undergraduate Research 3-28-2016 The Chronology of the Events in Zechariah 12-14 Won Jin Jeon Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/honors Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Jeon, Won Jin, "The Chronology of the Events in Zechariah 12-14" (2016). Honors Theses. 134. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/honors/134 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. ABSTRACT J. N. Andrews Honors Thesis Andrews University College of Arts & Sciences Title: THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE EVENTS IN ZECHARIAH 12-14 Author’s Name: Won Jin Jeon Advisor: Rahel Schafer, PhD Completion Date: March 2016 In current scholarship, there is a lack of consensus on the timing of the specific events in Zechariah 12-14, with a focus on eschatological or sequential chronologies. Preliminary exegetical research has revealed many connections between the three chapters. For instance, the occurs 17 times (versus four times in the rest of Zechariah). This (ביום־ההוא) ”phrase “in that day concentrated usage closely interconnects the three chapters and suggests that the timeliness of all of the events is in close succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Therefore, My Beloved Brethren, Be Ye Stedfast, Unmoveable, Always Abounding in the Work of the Lord, Forasmuch As Ye Know That Your Labour Is Not in Vain in the Lord
    Greater New Life Family Worship Center Thursday Night Teaching June 24th, 2021 2021 Theme: “Still Here” Thematic Text: 1 Corinthians 15:58 (KJV) Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord. T.N.T TEACHING SERIES: THE MIGHTY ACTS OF GOD Base Text: Psalm 150:1-6 (A PSALM OF PRAISE) (KJV) 150 Praise ye the Lord. Praise God in his sanctuary: praise him in the firmament of his power. 2 Praise him for his mighty acts: praise him according to his excellent greatness. 3 Praise him with the sound of the trumpet: praise him with the psaltery and harp. 4 Praise him with the timbrel and dance: praise him with stringed instruments and organs. 5 Praise him upon the loud cymbals: praise him upon the high sounding cymbals. 6 Let every thing that hath breath praise the Lord. Praise ye the Lord. 1 MIGHTY ACTS (According To: Christoph Barth OT Theology) 1. God Created Heaven and Earth 2. God Chose the Fathers of Israel 3. God Brought Israel Out of Egypt 4. God Led His People Through the Wilderness 5. God Revealed Himself at Sinai 6. God Granted Israel the Land of Caanan 7. God Raised Up Kings in Israel 8. God Chose Jerusalem 9. God Sent His Prophets 2 MIGHTY ACT #2 ‘GOD CHOSE THE FATHERS OF ISRAEL’ PART 6f LAST LESSON, JUNE 17th, 2021 V. THE LIBERATION BEGINS Exodus 5 New American Standard Bible (NASB) 5 And afterward Moses and Aaron came and said to Pharaoh, “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel says: ‘Let My people go so that they may celebrate a feast to Me in the wilderness.’” 2 But Pharaoh said, “Who is the LORD that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and besides, I will not let Israel go.” 3 Then they said, “The God of the Hebrews has met with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Shimei and Grace Sunday PM 05/02/21 Introduction: Perhaps You Have Never Paid Attention to Shimei in the Bible
    Shimei and Grace Sunday PM 05/02/21 Introduction: Perhaps you have never paid attention to Shimei in the Bible. He is not a particularly good person but he is like a lot of people we know. I) 2 Samuel 16 Absalom Rebels and David Flees Jerusalem A) Shimei curses David. 2 Samuel 16:5 Now when King David came to Bahurim, there was a man from the family of the house of Saul, whose name was Shimei the son of Gera, coming from there. He came out, cursing continuously as he came. 1. Notice his ancestry – of the house of Saul, a Benjamite. 2 Samuel 16:7 Also Shimei said thus when he cursed: "Come out! Come out! You bloodthirsty man, you rogue! 8 "The LORD has brought upon you all the blood of the house of Saul, in whose place you have reigned; and the LORD has delivered the kingdom into the hand of Absalom your son. So now you are caught in your own evil, because you are a bloodthirsty man!" 2. He seems to think David’s problems is due to how he treated King Saul. 3. Saul had died battling the Philistines, 1 Samuel 31. 4. Some believe this in connection with an event recorded in 2 Samuel 21.1 a. Saul had killed some Gibeonites, which is unrecorded and the Gibeonites come to David for justice. Page 1 of 8 2 Samuel 21:1 Now there was a famine in the days of David for three years, year after year; and David inquired of the LORD.
    [Show full text]
  • Eng-Kjv ZEC.Pdf Zechariah (23 Pages)
    Zechariah 1:1 1 Zechariah 1:10 Zechariah 1 In the eighth month, in the second year of Darius, came the word of the LORD unto Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo the prophet, saying, 2 The LORD hath been sore displeased with your fathers.* 3 Therefore say thou unto them, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Turn ye unto me, saith the LORD of hosts, and I will turn unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. 4 Be ye not as your fathers, unto whom the former prophets have cried, saying, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Turn ye now from your evil ways, and from your evil doings: but they did not hear, nor hearken unto me, saith the LORD. 5 Your fathers, where are they? and the prophets, do they live for ever? 6 But my words and my statutes, which I commanded my servants the prophets, did they not take hold of your fathers? and they returned and said, Like as the LORD of hosts thought to do unto us, according to our ways, and according to our doings, so hath he dealt with us.† 7 ¶ Upon the four and twentieth day of the eleventh month, which is the month Sebat, in the second year of Darius, came the word of the LORD unto Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo the prophet, saying, 8 I saw by night, and behold a man riding upon a red horse, and he stood among the myrtle trees that were in the bottom; and behind him were there red horses, speckled, and white.‡ 9 Then said I, O my lord, what are these? And the angel that talked with me said unto me, I will shew thee what these be.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM PATRIARCH to PILGRIM: the Development of the Biblical Figure of Abraham and Its Contribution to the Christian Metaphor of Spiritual Pilgrimage
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Faculty Dissertations 1988 From Patriarch to Pilgrim: The evelopmeD nt of the Biblical Figure of Abraham and Its Contribution to the Christian Metaphor of Spiritual Pilgrimage Daniel J. Estes Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/faculty_dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Estes, Daniel J., "From Patriarch to Pilgrim: The eD velopment of the Biblical Figure of Abraham and Its Contribution to the Christian Metaphor of Spiritual Pilgrimage" (1988). Faculty Dissertations. 3. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/faculty_dissertations/3 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM PATRIARCH TO PILGRIM: The Development of the Biblical Figure of Abraham and its Contribution to the Christian Metaphor of Spiritual Pilgrimage Daniel John Estes Clare Hall A Thesis Submitted to the University of Cambridge for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION 1 1 .1 The Concept of Pilgrimage 1 1.11 Pilgrimage as a Literary Theme 1 1.12 Pilgrimage as a Christian Theme J 1.2 Review of Literature on Abraham 4 1.J Rationale for the Study 10 1.4 Thesis of the Study 12 1.5 Plan for the Study 1) Chapter 2 - ABRAHAM THE SOJOURNER IN GENESIS 12-25 15 2.0 Introduction 15 2,1 Verbs of Movement in the Abrahamic Narratives 15 2.11 Verbs of Geographical Movement 15 2.12 Verbs Related to Tent Dwelling 17 .
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Class Notes on Zechariah
    Bible Class Notes On Zechariah “In the eighth month of the second year of Darius, the word of the Lord came to Zechariah the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo the prophet…” (Zechariah 1:1) © 2010 Jeff Asher www.BibleTalk.net A Timeline of Events Relevant to the Exilic & Post-exilic Prophets 614 B.C. Nabopolassar begins the siege of Nineveh 612 B.C. Nineveh falls as prophesied (Nahum 1:8; 2:6) 610 B.C. Ashurbanipal defeated at Haran 610 B.C. Josiah slain at Megiddo by Pharaoh Necho (II Kings 23:29) 609 B.C Assyrian counter-attack at Carchemish repulsed 606 B.C. Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael & Azariah taken to “Shinar” (Daniel 1:1; about 17 years old) 605 B.C. Nebuchadnezzar defeats Assyria and Egypt at Carchemish (II Kings 24:7) 605 B.C. Nebuchadnezzar ascends to the throne of Babylon (Jeremiah 25:1; 46:2) 604 B.C. First full year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign. 603 B.C. Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the Great Image (Daniel 2:1; cf. 1:1, 5) 597 B.C. Jehoiachin taken captive of Nebuchadnezzar (II Kings 24:10-12; Ezekiel about 25 years old, cf. 1:1-2; II Kings 24:14-15; Jeremiah 52:28) 597 B.C. Zedekiah ascends to the throne of David (II Kings 24:17) 587 B.C. Jerusalem besieged (Jeremiah 32:1-2; 52:1 ff.; II Kings 25:1; Ezekiel 24:1) 586 B.C. Jerusalem is destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar (II Kings 25:2-9; Jeremiah 39:1-10) 585 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • David and Shimei: Innocent Victim and Perpetrator?1
    Snyman: David and Shimei OTE 21/2 (2008), 435-454 435 David and Shimei: innocent victim and perpetrator?1 GERRIE SNYMAN UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA ABSTRACT Feeding on the current social anxiety in the country that is defined by racial lines, the paper suggests the possibility of a theology for the ‘retributed’, i.e. those who undergo justice in terms of affirma- tive action or land repossession. Employing Ndebele’s thoughts on the folktale The lion and the rabbit and the issue of justice in Lars von Trier’s Dogville as its matrices, the paper enquires into the roles of perpetrator or victim Shimei and David play to each other in Samuel-Kings in order to see whether Shimei’s death constitutes retributive justice or whether there is some social benefit in turning him into a purificatory sacrifice in a Girardian sense. A INTRODUCTION What does one say to someone whose job opportunities have been affected by what can be referred to as ‘redress of past injustices’? Similarly, how does one counsel someone whose farm has been attached because of a land claim? These occurrences, affirmative action as well as land restitution, act as lawful mecha- nisms through which the working force is supposed to become more represen- tative of the general population and through which those who lost land under the previous regime, can repossess land. The process of redress operates on the basis of justice. Nonetheless, those upon whom redress is visited, and depen- ding on their political outlook, do not always experience their situation as one of justice.
    [Show full text]