PUBLICOPINION Solid and Professional 1/2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PUBLICOPINION Solid and Professional 1/2018 POLISH PUBLICOPINION Solid and Professional 1/2018 ISSN 2083-1714 CONTENTS Reactions to triggering of Article 7 of TEU against Poland Reactions to triggering of Article 7 of TEU against On December 20, 2017, the European Commission decided to launch Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union against Poland and asked the Council of the EU to Poland declare the existence of a clear risk of a serious violation of European values in Poland. At the same time, the Commission issued the fourth recommendation First evaluations on the rule of law, in which it called on the Polish authorities to amend the laws of the government reforming the judiciary and "restore the independence and legitimacy of the of Mateusz Morawiecki Constitutional Tribunal." The activities of the EU institutions aimed at protecting the rule of law in Poland Evaluation of Andrzej have aroused public controversy from the beginning. Triggering Article 7 of the TEU, like the previous actions of the European Commission and the European Duda's presidency Parliament, is received ambiguously. The European Commission's request to in the middle of the term declare the existence of a clear risk of a serious violation of European values in Poland is slightly more often perceived critically than approved. Over two-fifths Subjective well-being of respondents (43%) believe that triggering Article 7 of the TEU is unjustified, in 2017 while 38% are convinced of the legitimacy of this step. In the opinion of nearly half of Poles (46%) the decision of the European Commission results from aversion to the Law and Justice (PiS) and the current authorities of our country. Fewer respondents (37%) perceive it as an expression of concern for the state of IN ADDITION the rule of law and In your opinion, triggering of the Article 7 of the TEU TO THE REPORTS REFERRED TO ABOVE, democracy in Poland. In by the EC towards Poland is: THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED addition, in the public justified unjustified Don't know RECENTLY (IN POLISH): 38% 43% 19% opinion, the EC's request · to declare the existence results from concern for results from aversion Politician of the Year 2017 in Poland and the state of the rule of law to the Law and Justice in the World of a clear risk of a serious and democracy in Poland and current Polish authorities Don't know 37% 46% 17% · The Most Important Event of the Year violation of European 2017 for Poland and for the World values in Poland is more acceptable form of pressure unacceptable form of pressure on the Polish authorities on the Polish authorities Don't know · Evaluations of the Year 2017 and often considered as 34% 45% 21% Forecasts for the Year 2018 unacceptable (45%) · Does Warsaw Need New Memorials? than as acceptable (34%) form of pressure on the Polish authorities. · Life Satisfaction Poles are divided in opinions on whether our country should take into account · Political Party Preferences in the recommendations of the European Commission regarding withdrawal of Voivodships some changes in the judiciary and the functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal. · Political Party Preferences after Cabinet In total, 44% of respondents think that Poland should meet the Commission's Reshuffle expectations. Fewer people (41%) are of the opposite opinion. Proponents and · Opinions about Parliament and opponents of taking into account the recommendations of the European President Commission approach the issue from different perspectives. People who favour · Social Moods in January the adoption of EU recommendations justify their position by the conviction that · Trust in Politicians after Cabinet the rule of law in Poland is at stake, rather than expressing concerns that failure Reshuffle to take into account the expectations of the European Commission may have · Expectations for Mateusz Morawiecki's negative, political and economic consequences for Poland. Opponents of taking Government into account the Commission's recommendations more often refer to the sovereignty of Poland than to the lack of threat to the rule of law in our country. Should Poland take into account European Commission's recommendations regarding the withdrawal of some First evaluations of the changes in the judiciary and the functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal? of the government Yes, because failure to do so may have negative, political and economic of Mateusz Morawiecki consequences for Poland 16% The government of Mateusz Morawiecki has been received No, because Poland is a sovereign by society quite well. Reactions to its creation are clearly 26% country and cannot succumb Yes, because the rule of law to this kind of pressure in Poland is under threat 28% better than those expressed over two years ago at the formation of Beata Szydło's cabinet. Nearly half of 15% 15% No, because the rule of law respondents (46%) express hope that the situation in Don't know in Poland is not threatened Poland will improve in connection with the establishment Triggering legal mechanisms ensuring that member states of the government of Mateusz Morawiecki. Much smaller adhere to EU values, including maintaining the rule of law, groups of respondents react to the formation of the against Poland has not raised concerns about the government with disappointment that nothing will introduction of sanctions against our country. At present, change (15%) or with fear of deterioration (13%). slightly more than half of respondents (51%) are Indifference to the government is declared by almost one concerned with the possibility of sanctions against fifth of respondents (18%). Poland, whereas two fifths of respondents (40%) are not Reactions to the formation of the government of: afraid of this. % If, as the next step of the procedure, there is a vote in the Beata Szydło (XII '15) 34 12 37 13 4 European Council on the determination of the existence of Mateusz Morawiecki (I '18) 46 15 13 18 8 a serious and persistent violation of European values by Hope for Disappointment Fear of Indifference Don't the better that nothing will deterioration know Poland, which may result in the introduction of sanctions, change in public opinion at least one country would take Poland's The level of acceptance of Mateusz Morawiecki as Prime side. A total of 63% of respondents share this opinion, in which 35% believe that there would be more such Minister is quite large. More than half of respondents countries. (54%) are satisfied with the new head of government. Dissatisfaction is expressed by every fifth respondent If there is a vote in the European Council on the (20%). Beata Szydło was much less widely accepted at the determination of the existence a serious and permanent violation by Poland of European values, which in the future beginning of her term in office. may result in the introduction of sanctions against our The first evaluations of Mateusz Morawiecki as Prime country, how do you think EU member states would behave? Minister are better than Beata Szydło's last. The new head One country would take of government has slightly more supporters, but far fewer Poland's side 28% opponents than Beata Szydło in December 2017. No country would take Poland's side, voting against the determination More countries 35% would take Poland's of the existence of a serious 19% Are you satisfied that Beata Szydło/Mateusz Morawiecki and persistent violation side of European values in our country is Prime Minister? 18% 60% Yes Don't know 54% 50% Respondents convinced that at least one member state 40% would share Poland's position by voting against the 30% No determination of the existence of a serious and permanent violation of European values by our country, 20% 20% most often spontaneously mentioned Hungary in this 10% 0% context (77%). Relatively many people count on support I 2016 V X I 2017 V XII I 2018 from the Czech Republic (22%), Slovakia (16%) and Bulgaria (14%). Moreover, Lithuania (8%), Germany (7%) Don't know omitted and Romania (5%) were mentioned. Generally, Poles The new government receives relatively large public expect solidarity above all from the countries of our region support at the commencement of its activity, larger than or, more broadly, post-communist countries. Beata Szydło's cabinet at the beginning of the term. Over two-fifths of respondents (42%) are supporters Mateusz More information about this topic can be found in CBOS report in Morawiecki's government. Only every seventh Polish: "Reactions on Triggering Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union against Poland", January 2018. Fieldwork for national sample: respondent (14%) self-identifies as opponent of the new January 2018, N=951. The random address sample is representative for government. One-third (33%) keep their distance to the adult population of Poland. government and declare indifference. 2 The first ratings of Mateusz Morawiecki's cabinet are In your opinion, president Andrzej Duda, when making better than the last ratings of Beata Szydło's. The new decisions: government has far fewer opponents. is primarily guided 47% by the interests of the country Attitude to the government of Beata Szydło/Mateusz Morawiecki Don't know 13% 50% 45% 40% is primarily guided by the interests Supporters 42% 40% of the political circles from which he originates 35% Opponents 33% 30% The vast majority of respondents (77%) believe that the 25% Indifferent 20% current president well represents Poland abroad. 15% 14% 10% How does president Andrzej Duda represent Poland 5% abroad? 0% I V X I V XII I Very well 2016 2017 2018 27% Don't know omitted Don't know 9% Very badly 5% More information about this topic can be found in CBOS report in 9% Polish: "The First Ratings of Mateusz Morawiecki's Government", Moderately badly 50% Moderately well January 2018.
Recommended publications
  • Dear President, Dear Ursula, We Welcome the Letter of 1 March That
    March 8, 2021 Dear President, dear Ursula, We welcome the letter of 1 March that you received from Chancellor Merkel and PM Frederiksen, PM Kallas and PM Marin. We share many of the ideas outlined in the letter. Indeed, there are some points that we find are of particular importance as we work to progress the digital agenda for the EU. We certainly agree that our agenda must be founded on a good mix of self-determination and openness. Our approach to digital sovereignty must be geared towards growing digital leadership by preparing for smart and selective action to ensure capacity where called for, while preserving open markets and strengthening global cooperation and the external trade dimension. Digital innovation benefits from partnerships among sectors, promoting public and private cooperation. Translating excellence in research and innovation into commercial successes is crucial to creating global leadership. The Single Market remains key to our prosperity and to the productivity and competitiveness of European companies, and our regulatory framework needs to be made fit for the digital age. We need a Digital Single Market for innovation, to eliminate barriers to cross-border online services, and to ensure free data flows. Attention must be paid to the external dimension where we should continue to work closely with our allies around the world and where in our interest, develop new partnerships. We need to make sure that the EU can be a leader of a responsible digital transformation. Trust and innovation are two sides of the same coin. Europe’s competitiveness should be built on efficient, trustworthy, transparent, safe and responsible use of data in accordance with our shared values.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland by Piotr Arak, Andrzej Bobiński
    Poland by Piotr Arak, Andrzej Bobiński Capital: Warsaw Population: 38 million GNI/capita, PPP: $25,930 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 National Democratic 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Governance Electoral Process 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 Independent Media 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 3.00 Local Democratic 1.75 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 Governance Judicial Framework 3.25 2.50 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 and Independence Corruption 3.00 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Democracy Score 2.39 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 2.18 2.18 2.21 2.32 2.57 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • HEADS of STATE Protocol and Liaison Service HEADS of GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LIST MINISTERS for FOREIGN AFFAIRS
    UNITED NATIONS HEADS OF STATE Protocol and Liaison Service HEADS OF GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LIST MINISTERS FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AFGHANISTAN His Excellency Same as Head of State His Excellency Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Ghani Mr. Salahuddin Rabbani Full Title President of the Islamic Republic of Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic Afghanistan of Afghanistan Date of Appointment 29-Sep-14 02-Feb-15 ALBANIA His Excellency His Excellency same as Prime Minister Mr. Ilir Meta Mr. Edi Rama Full Title President of the Republic of Albania Prime Minister and Minister for Europe and Foreign Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of the Affairs of the Republic of Albania Republic of Albania Date of Appointment 24-Jul-17 15-Sep-13 21-Jan-19 ALGERIA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monsieur Abdelkader Bensalah Monsieur Nour-Eddine Bedoui Monsieur Sabri Boukadoum Full Title Chef d'État de la République algérienne Premier Ministre de la République algérienne Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la République démocratique et populaire démocratique et populaire algérienne démocratique et populaire Date of Appointment 09-Apr-19 31-Mar-19 31-Mar-19 31/05/2019 Page 1 of 66 COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS ANDORRA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monseigneur Joan Enric Vives Sicília Monsieur Xavier Espot Zamora Madame Maria Ubach Font et Son Excellence Monsieur Emmanuel Macron Full Title Co-Princes de la Principauté d’Andorre Chef du Gouvernement de la Principauté d’Andorre Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la Principauté d’Andorre Date of Appointment 16-May-12 21-May-19 17-Jul-17 ANGOLA His Excellency His Excellency Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland by Anna Wójcik Capital: Warsaw Population: 37.95 Million GNI/Capita, PPP: $26,770
    Poland by Anna Wójcik Capital: Warsaw Population: 37.95 million GNI/capita, PPP: $26,770 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic Governance 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 3.25 4.00 Electoral Process 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 2.00 Independent Media 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.00 Local Democratic Governance 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 2.00 Judicial Framework and Independence 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 3.25 4.25 Corruption 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Democracy Score 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 2.18 2.18 2.21 2.32 2.57 2.89 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • La Fondation Robert Schuman
    Having problems in reading this e-mail? Click here Tuesday 16th January 2018 issue 787 The Letter in PDF format The Foundation on and The foundation application available on Appstore and Google Play Catalonia: the lie of the land after the battle Author: Angel Sanchez Navarro On 21st December the Catalans voted. Nearly a month later we can put forward the first ideas about the results, their meaning and the impact these might have. Whilst in society and the Spanish Parliament there is a very wide majority in support of the respect of the rules of the game, the ballot boxes have revealed a deeply divided society in two quantitatively similar blocks, although one of them has been in government for nearly forty years. Read more Elections : Czech Republic Commission : Priorities 2018 - Budget - Supercomputers - Digital - Sustainable development Council : Bulgaria - Eurogroup - Korea/Sanctions Diplomacy : Iran/Nuclear - Iraq Court of Justice : Morocco Court of Auditors : Regions Germany : Coalition Austria : France Bulgaria : Anti-corruption France : Italy - China Italy : Summit/Europe-South Poland : Relations/EU - Re-shuffle Romania : Government/Resignation UK : Re-shuffle Slovenia : Croatia Sweden : NATO Eurostat : Unemployment - Trade Studies/Reports : Impact/Brexit Culture : Exhibition/Vienna - Exhibition/Paris - Design/Cologne Agenda | Other issues | Contact Elections : Milo Zeman and Jiri Drahos will face each other in the second round of the Czech Presidential election Outgoing President of the Czech Republic, Milos Zeman (Citizens Rights Party - SPOZ) came out ahead in the first round of the presidential election on 12th and 13th January 38.56% of the vote. In the 2nd round on 26th and 27th January, he will face Jiri Drahos (independent), the former President of the Academy of Science who has the support of the People's Christian-Democratic Union (KDU-CSL), (a centrist party led by Pavel Belobradek), and the movement Mayors and Independents (STAN), (a party led by Petr Gazdik, who won 26.60% of the vote).
    [Show full text]
  • RJEA Vol19 No2 December2019.Cdr
    Title: Common Interests and the Most Important Areas of Political Cooperation between Poland and Romania in the Context of the European Union Author: Justyna Łapaj-Kucharska Citation style: Łapaj-Kucharska Justyna. (2019). Common Interests and the Most Important Areas of Political Cooperation between Poland and Romania in the Context of the European Union. "Romanian Journal of European Affairs" (2019, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 63-86). ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN AFFAIRS Vol. 19, No. 2, December 2019 Common Interests and the Most Important Areas of Political Cooperation between Poland and Romania in the Context of the European Union Justyna Łapaj-Kucharska1 Abstract: The article addresses several issues that constitute the main areas of Polish-Romanian relations in the 21st century in the political dimension and in the broad sense of security. Relations between Poland and Romania have been characterized in the context of the membership of both countries in the European Union. Particular emphasis was placed on the period of the Romanian Presidency of the Council of EU, which lasted from January to the end of June 2019. The article indicates the most important common interests of both countries, the ways for their implementation, as well as potential opportunities for the development of bilateral and multilateral cooperation. The article also takes into account the key challenges that Poland and Romania must face in connection with EU membership. Keywords: Romania, Poland, European Union, Three Seas Initiative, multilateral cooperation. Introduction Polish-Romanian relations were particularly close in 1921-1939, when Romania was the only neighbour, apart from Latvia, who was Poland's ally.
    [Show full text]
  • Where the Law Ends
    ideaForum Where the law ends The collapse of the rule of law in Poland – and what to do “Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.” (Article 47, EU Charter on Fundamental Rights) Berlin – Warsaw 29 May 2018 ii Executive Summary No member state of the EU has ever gone as far in subjugating its courts to executive control as the current Polish government has done. The Polish case is a test whether it is possible to create a Soviet-style justice system, where the control of courts, prosecutors and judges lies with the executive and a single party, in an EU member state. In December 2017 the Commission proposed to the EU Council to determine that there was “a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law.” It warned that in Poland the constitutionality of laws “can no longer be verified and guaranteed by an independent constitutional tribunal.” It expressed “grave concerns” over the lack of independent courts. In March 2018 an Irish High Court judge noted a “deliberate, calculated and provocative legislative dismantling by Poland of the independence of the judiciary, a key component of the rule of law.” She argued, in an extradition case involving a Polish suspect, that “the rule of law in Poland has been systematically damaged by the cumulative impact of all the legislative changes that have taken place over the last two years.” Things are about to get even worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Political Briefing: Political Crisis and Changes in the Composition of the Government Joanna Ciesielska-Klikowska
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 33, No. 1 (PL) October 2020 Poland political briefing: Political crisis and changes in the composition of the government Joanna Ciesielska-Klikowska 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Political crisis and changes in the composition of the government Last weeks have brought an almost never-ending discussion about changes in the government and its planned reconstruction. It is a rare procedure in the Polish political system under which some ministers lose their powers and new ones appear on the stage. Unexpectedly, however, the Animal Protection Act shook the talks and caused a serious political crisis. The reconstruction that followed the crisis is very far-reaching and shows who is genuinely ruling the country. Political crisis related to the Animal Protection Act The debate about reducing the number of ministries, changing their competences or powers of individual ministers had already been going on throughout the summer period (see Poland 2020 September Domestic Policy Briefing). When it seemed that the three parties which create the ruling coalition of the United Right (Law and Justice Party, Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS; United Poland; Solidarna Polska; Agreement, Porozumienie Jarosława Gowina) were already agreeing on the appearance of the new government, one vote shocked the political scene and public opinion. A real game changer was the voting on the Animal Protection Act (so-called "five for animals" act), which entered the deliberations of the parliament on September 18, and was voted shortly after by a large part of the political circles represented in the SeJm.
    [Show full text]
  • Druk Nr 3069 Warszawa, 23 Listopada 2018 R
    Druk nr 3069 Warszawa, 23 listopada 2018 r. SEJM RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ VIII kadencja Pan Marek Kuchciński Marszałek Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej Na podstawie art. 158 ust. 1 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz art. 115 ust. 1 regulaminu Sejmu niżej podpisani posłowie składają wniosek: - o wyrażenie wotum nieufności Radzie Ministrów kierowanej przez Prezesa Rady Ministrów Pana Mateusza Morawieckiego i wybranie Pana Grzegorza Schetyny na Prezesa Rady Ministrów. Do reprezentowania wnioskodawców upoważniamy pana posła Grzegorza Schetynę. (-) Zbigniew Ajchler; (-) Bartosz Arłukowicz; (-) Paweł Arndt; (-) Urszula Augustyn; (-) Joanna Augustynowska; (-) Tadeusz Aziewicz; (-) Paweł Bańkowski; (-) Anna Białkowska; (-) Jerzy Borowczak; (-) Krzysztof Brejza; (-) Bożenna Bukiewicz; (-) Małgorzata Chmiel; (-) Alicja Chybicka; (-) Janusz Cichoń; (-) Piotr Cieśliński; (-) Tomasz Cimoszewicz; (-) Zofia Czernow; (-) Andrzej Czerwiński; (-) Ewa Drozd; (-) Artur Dunin; (-) Waldy Dzikowski; (-) Joanna Fabisiak; (-) Joanna Frydrych; (-) Grzegorz Furgo; (-) Krzysztof Gadowski; (-) Zdzisław Gawlik; (-) Stanisław Gawłowski; (-) Lidia Gądek; (-) Elżbieta Gelert; (-) Artur Gierada; (-) Marta Golbik; (-) Cezary Grabarczyk; (-) Jan Grabiec; (-) Rafał Grupiński; (-) Andrzej Halicki; (-) Agnieszka Hanajczyk; (-) Bożena Henczyca; (-) Jolanta Hibner; (-) Marek Hok; (-) Maria Małgorzata Janyska; (-) Bożena Kamińska; (-) Włodzimierz Karpiński; (-) Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska; (-) Joanna Kluzik-Rostkowska; (-) Magdalena Kochan; (-) Agnieszka Kołacz-Leszczyńska;
    [Show full text]
  • ZAPA's Position on Chapter 1 and 2
    Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich ZAPA – Związek Autorów i Producentów Audiowizualnych Polish Filmmakers Association ZAPA – Union of Audiovisual Authors and Producers Warsaw, 17 February 2021 Mr Mateusz Morawiecki Prime Minister, Minister of Digitisation ul. Królewska 27 00-060 Warsaw Re: Proposal for a regulation on digital services COM (2020) 825 – Digital Services Act Dear Mr Prime Minister, Acting on behalf of the Polish Filmmakers Association – Union of Audiovisual Authors and Producers (hereinafter: “SFP-ZAPA”) we would like to thank you for the consultation meeting to discuss the proposal for a regulation on digital services COM (2020) 825 (hereinafter: “Regulation” or “Digital Services Act”), where its participants were asked to present their opinions on three questions, considered by the Chancellery of the Prime Minister of Poland (KPRM) to be of paramount importance, and to provide their comments on the provisions of Chapters I and II of the Digital Services Act. However, we would like to start by emphasizing that authors and the audiovisual sector have identified different top priority issues that should be discussed and modified at the stage of works carried out by the Council of the European Union. The basis of the Digital Services Act are the principles of exemption of service providers from liability for the provision of services by electronic means, which have been transferred almost unchanged from Directive 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (hereinafter: “e- Commerce Directive”). However, the regulatory environment created in 2000 was responding to completely different needs and problems than those we are facing today.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Reports in Europe
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN EUROPE REVIEW OF 2019 Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2020 Cover photo: Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed A protester speaks through a megaphone as under a Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, smoke from coloured smoke bombs billows near international 4.0) licence. people taking part in the annual May Day rally in https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Strasbourg, eastern France, on May 1, 2019. For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: © PATRICK HERTZOG/AFP via Getty Images www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2020 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street, London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: EUR 01/2098/2020 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS REGIONAL OVERVIEW 4 ALBANIA 8 AUSTRIA 10 BELGIUM 12 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 14 BULGARIA 16 CROATIA 18 CYPRUS 20 CZECH REPUBLIC 22 DENMARK 24 ESTONIA 26 FINLAND 27 FRANCE 29 GERMANY 32 GREECE 35 HUNGARY 38 IRELAND 41 ITALY 43 LATVIA 46 LITHUANIA 48 MALTA 49 MONTENEGRO 51 THE NETHERLANDS 53 NORTH MACEDONIA 55 NORWAY 57 POLAND 59 PORTUGAL 62 ROMANIA 64 SERBIA 66 SLOVAKIA 69 SLOVENIA 71 SPAIN 73 SWEDEN 76 SWITZERLAND 78 TURKEY 80 UK 84 HUMAN RIGHTS IN EUROPE 3 REVIEW OF 2019 Amnesty International campaigns, harassment, and even In 2019, founding values of the European administrative and criminal penalties.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from 55 Civil Society Organisations to EU Heads Of
    To: Federal Chancellor of Austria, Sebastian Kurz; Prime Minister of Belgium, Charles Michel; Prime Minister of Bulgaria, Boyko Borissov; Prime Minister of Croatia, Andrej Plenkovic; President of the Republic of Cyprus, Nicos Anastasiades; Prime Minister of Czech Republic, Andrej Babis; Prime Minister of Denmark, Lars Lokke Rasmussen; Prime Minister of Estonia, Juri Ratas; Prime Minister of Finland, Juha Sipila; President of the Republic of France, Emmanuel Macron; Federal Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel; Prime Minister of Greece, Alexis Tsipras; Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban; Taoiseach of Ireland, Leo Varadkar; Prime Minister of Italy, Giuseppe Conte; Prime Minister of Latvia, Krisjanis Karins; President of Lithuania, Dalia Grybauskaite; Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Xavier Bettel; Prime Minister of Malta, Joseph Muscat; Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte; Prime Minister of Poland, Mateusz Morawiecki; Prime Minister of Portugal, Antonio Costa; President of Romania, Klaus Werner Iohannis; Prime Minister of Slovakia, Peter Pellegrini; Prime Minister of Slovenia, Marjan Sarec; President of the Government of Spain, Pedro Sanchez; Prime Minister of Sweden, Stefan Lofven. 7th May 2019 Dear Federal Chancellor/President/Prime Minister/Taoiseach, On behalf of 55 civil society organisations from across Europe, we are writing to you to urge you to nominate European commissioners who will support and serve present and future generations, and prioritise environment, quality of life and decent work. Every day, people across Europe struggle with growing poverty and inequality, deteriorating access to healthcare and worrying levels of youth unemployment. Meanwhile, many large companies pollute the environment, refuse to pay their fair share of taxes and wield disproportionate political influence.
    [Show full text]