DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Epidemics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Epidemics List of epidemics This is a list of the biggest known epidemics (including pandemics) caused by an infectious disease. Widespread non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer are not included. An epidemic is the rapid spread of disease to a large number of people in a given population within a short period of time. For example, in meningococcal infections, an attack rate in excess of 15 cases per 100,000 people for two consecutive weeks is considered an epidemic.[1] 17th-century German "plague panel" depicting the triumph of death. Panels of this kind were placed on the walls of houses to warn against the plague. A plague epidemic raged in Augsburg, Bavaria between 1632 and 1635 Emergency hospital during Spanish Influenza epidemic, Camp Funston, Kansas (1918-20) Death toll Event Date Location Disease Ref. (estimate) Babylon, or Babirus of the Persians, Sanskrit scholars found Influenza 1200 BC Central Asia, records of a disease Unknown [2] epidemic Mesopotamia resembling the Flu and Southern Asia Unknown, possibly Plague of 429–426 Greece, Libya, typhus, typhoid fever or 75,000–100,000 [3][4][5][6] Athens BC Egypt, Ethiopia viral hemorrhagic fever Greece 412 BC (Northern Unknown, possibly 412 BC Unknown [7] epidemic Greece, Roman influenza Republic) 165–180 Unknown, possibly Antonine Plague (possibly Roman Empire 5–10 million [8] smallpox up to 190) Plague of Unknown, possibly 250–266 Europe 1 million+ [9][10] Cyprian smallpox 25–100 million (40– Plague of Europe and Bubonic plague (beginning 541–542 50% of population [11][12][13] Justinian West Asia of First plague pandemic) of Europe) Rome, Roman Plague Bubonic plague (part of 590 Byzantine Unknown [14] of 590 First plague pandemic) Empire Plague of Bubonic plague (part of 627–628 Mesopotamia Unknown [15] Sheroe First plague pandemic) Bubonic plague (part of Plague of 664 664–689 British Isles Unknown [16] First plague pandemic) Byzantine Plague of 698– Empire, West Bubonic plague (part of 698–701 Unknown [17] 701 Asia, Syria, First plague pandemic) Mesopotamia 735–737 2 million (approx. Japanese 735–737 Japan Smallpox 1⁄ of Japanese [18][19] smallpox 3 epidemic population) Byzantine Plague of 746– Bubonic plague (part of 746–747 Empire, West Unknown [20] 747 First plague pandemic) Asia, Africa Bubonic plague Black Death Europe, Asia 75–200 million (10– (start of the 1346–1353 and North 60% of European [21] Second plague Africa Yersinia pestis population) pandemic) bacterium Britain Sweating (England) and Unknown, possibly an sickness 1485–1551 later unknown species of 10,000+ [22] (multiple continental hantavirus outbreaks) Europe 1489 Spain 1489 Spain Typhus 17,000 [23] typhus epidemic Unknown, around 1510 influenza Asia, North 1510 Influenza 1% of those [24] pandemic Africa, Europe infected 1520 Mexico 5–8 million (40% of smallpox 1519–1520 Mexico Smallpox [25] population) epidemic Cocoliztli Possibly Salmonella 5–15 million (80% Epidemic of 1545–1548 Mexico [26][27][28][29] enterica of population) 1545–1548 1561 Chile Unknown (20-25% smallpox 1561–1562 Chile Smallpox of native [30] epidemic population) 1563 London London, 1563–1564 Bubonic plague 20,100+ [31] plague England Cocoliztli Possibly Salmonella 2–2.5 million (50% epidemic of 1576–1580 Mexico [26][27][28][29] enterica of population) 1576 1582 Tenerife 1582–1583 Tenerife, Spain Bubonic plague 5,000–9,000 [32] plague epidemic 1592–1596 Seneca nation, Seneca nation 1592–1596 United States Measles Unknown [33] measles and Canada epidemic 1592–93 Malta 1592–1593 Malta Bubonic plague 3,000 [34] plague epidemic 1592–93 London London, 1592–1593 Bubonic plague 19,900+ [35] plague England 1596–1602 Spain plague 1596–1602 Spain Bubonic plague 600,000–700,000 [36] epidemic 1600–1650 South America 1600–1650 South America Malaria Unknown [37] malaria epidemic 1603 London London, 1603 Bubonic plague 40,000 [38][39][40] plague epidemic England 1609 Egyptian 1609 Egypt Bubonic plague 1 million plague epidemic Unknown, possibly leptospirosis with Weil Southern New syndrome. Classic 1616 New England, explanations include Unknown England United States, yellow fever, bubonic 1616–1620 (estimated 30–90% [41][42] infections especially the plague, influenza, of population) epidemic Wampanoag smallpox, chickenpox, people typhus, and syndemic infection of hepatitis B and hepatitis D 1629–1631 1629–1631 Italy Bubonic plague 280,000 [43][44] Italian plague 1632–1635 1632–1635 Augsburg, Bubonic plague 13,712 [45] Augsburg Germany plague epidemic Massachusetts Massachusetts Bay Colony, smallpox 1633–1634 Smallpox 1,000 [46] Thirteen epidemic Colonies 1634–1640 Wyandot Wyandot people people, United 1634–1640 Smallpox and Influenza 15,000–25,000 [47] epidemic of States and infections Canada London and 1637 London 1636–1637 Westminster, Bubonic plague 10,400 [48] plague epidemic England 1641–1644 China plague 1641–1644 China Bubonic plague Unknown [49] epidemic Great Plague of 1647–1652 Spain Bubonic plague 500,000 [50] Seville 1648 Central Central America yellow 1648 Yellow fever Unknown [51] America fever epidemic Naples Plague 1656 Italy Bubonic plague 1,250,000 [52] 1663–1664 Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1663–1664 Bubonic plague 24,148 [53] Netherlands plague epidemic Great Plague of 1665–1666 England Bubonic plague 100,000 [54][55] London 1668 France 1668 France Bubonic plague 40,000 [56] plague 1675–76 Malta 1675–1676 Malta Bubonic plague 11,300 [57] plague epidemic 1676–1685 1676–1685 Spain Bubonic plague Unknown [58] Spain plague 1677–1678 Massachusetts Boston 1677–1678 Bay Colony, Smallpox 750–1000 [59] smallpox United States epidemic Great Plague of 1679 Vienna, Austria Bubonic plague 76,000 [60] Vienna 1681 Prague Prague, Czech 1681 Bubonic plague 83,000 [61] plague epidemic Kingdom 1687 South Unknown, possibly Africa Influenza 1687 South Africa Unknown [62] Influenza outbreak 1693 Boston Boston, United yellow fever 1693 Yellow fever 3,100+ [63] States epidemic 1699 Charleston Charleston and 520 (300 in and Philadelphia 1699 Philadelphia, Yellow fever Charleston, 220 in [64] yellow fever United States Philadelphia) epidemic 1702 New York 1702 New York City, Yellow fever 500 [65] City yellow United States fever epidemic 1702–1703 St. Lawrence Valley New France, 1702–1703 Smallpox 1,300 [66] smallpox Canada epidemic 1707–1709 Iceland 18,000+ (36% of 1707–1709 Iceland Smallpox [67] smallpox population) epidemic Great Northern Denmark, War plague 1710–1712 Sweden, Bubonic plague 164,000 [68][69] outbreak Lithuania 1713–1715 Thirteen North America Colonies and 1713–1715 Measles Unknown [70][71] measles New France, epidemic Canada Great Plague of 1720–1722 France Bubonic plague 100,000+ [72] Marseille 1721 Boston Massachusetts smallpox 1721–1722 Smallpox 844 [73] Bay Colony outbreak 1730 Cádiz yellow fever 1730 Cádiz, Spain Yellow fever 2,200 [74] epidemic 1732–1733 Thirteen Thirteen Colonies 1732–1733 Influenza Unknown [75] Colonies influenza epidemic 1733 New France New France, 1733 Smallpox Unknown [76] smallpox Canada epidemic New England, 1735–1741 New York, New Diphtheria 1735–1741 Diphtheria 20,000 [77] Jersey, United epidemic States Great Plague of 1738 Balkans Bubonic plague 50,000 [78] 1738 1738–1739 North Carolina North Carolina, 1738–1739 Smallpox 7,700–11,700 [79] smallpox United States epidemic 1739–1740 Thirteen Thirteen Colonies 1739–1740 Measles Unknown Colonies measles epidemic 1741 Cartagena Cartagena, yellow fever 1741 Yellow fever 20,000 [80] Colombia epidemic 1743 Sicily Messina, 1743 Bubonic plague 40,000–50,000 [81][82] plague epidemic Sicily, Italy 1747 Thirteen 1747 Thirteen Measles Unknown Colonies Colonies measles outbreak 1759 North America 1759 North America Measles Unknown [83] measles outbreak 1760 Charleston Charleston, smallpox 1760 Smallpox 730–940 [84][85] United States epidemic 1761 North America and North America, West Indies 1761 Influenza Unknown West Indies influenza epidemic 1762 Havana yellow fever 1762 Havana, Cuba Yellow fever 8,000 [80] epidemic 1763 Pittsburgh North America, area smallpox 1763 present-day Smallpox Unknown [86] outbreak Pittsburgh area Russian plague 1770–1772 Russia Bubonic plague 50,000 [87] of 1770–1772 1772 North America 1772 North America Measles Unknown measles epidemic 1772–1773 1772–1773 Persia Bubonic plague 2 million+ [88] Persian Plague 1775–1776 England 1775–1776 England Influenza Unknown [89] influenza outbreak 1775–1782 Pacific North American 1775–1782 Northwest, Smallpox 11,000+ [90][91] smallpox United States epidemic 1778 Spain dengue fever 1778 Spain Dengue fever Unknown [92] outbreak 1788 Pueblo Pueblo Indians, Indians 1788 Southwestern Smallpox Unknown [93] smallpox United States epidemic 1788 United States measles 1788 United States Measles Unknown epidemic 1789–1790 New New South Unknown (50–70% South Wales 1789–1790 Wales, Smallpox of native [94][95] smallpox Australia population) epidemic 1793 United States influenza Influenza and epidemic 1793 United States Unknown and typhus typhus epidemic 1793 1793 Philadelphia, Yellow fever 5,000+ Philadelphia United States [96] yellow fever epidemic 1800–1803 Spain yellow 1800–1803 Spain Yellow fever 60,000+ [97] fever epidemic 1801 Ottoman Empire and Ottoman 1801 Bubonic plague Unknown [98] Egypt bubonic Empire, Egypt plague epidemic 1802–1803 Saint-Domingue Saint- 1802–1803 Yellow fever 29,000–55,000 [99] yellow fever Domingue epidemic 1812 Egypt bubonic plague 1812 Egypt Bubonic plague Unknown epidemic 1812 Russia Typhus 1812 Russia Typhus 300,000 [23] epidemic 1812–19 Ottoman Ottoman plague
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Small Drinking Water Systems Project
    Strong evidence, stronger public health Small Drinking Water-borne Disease Outbreaks in Water Systems Canadian Small Drinking Water Systems Project Hannah Moffatt, Sylvia Struck Report Highlights Information about Canadian drinking water systems and past water-borne disease outbreaks is incomplete and non-standardized. Standard definitions and coordinated surveillance systems for water-borne disease outbreaks would help inform policy and practice. A relatively high proportion of past water-borne disease outbreaks in Canada are estimated to have occurred in small drinking water systems serving populations of 5,000 people or less. Water-borne disease outbreaks in small drinking water systems are often the result of a combination of water system failures; contributing factors often include a lack of source water protection and inadequate drinking water treatment. Analyses suggest small drinking water systems face challenges associated with infrastructure, technology, and financial constraints. Investments in drinking water systems and operator training have the potential to reduce the burden of water-borne disease in Canada. Executive Summary Generally, Canadians have access to safe and secure drinking water. However, as demonstrated by the events of Walkerton in 2000, the exception can be tragic. Outbreaks of water-borne disease are preventable, yet evidence-informed policy and practice is hampered, in part, by our limited knowledge of drinking water systems that experience outbreaks and the factors that contribute to outbreaks in Canada. There is no national surveillance system for systematic collection of water-borne disease outbreak data. Investigating past water-borne disease outbreaks is a valuable approach to collect information to inform practice and policy. Investigations of water-borne disease outbreaks are challenging because the outbreak events are rare, the pathogenic agents involved may be transmitted via multiple routes (e.g., person to person, food-borne, as well as water-borne), and gastrointestinal illnesses are frequently under-reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandemic Flu Planning for Schools
    PandemicPandemicPandemic FluFluFlu PlanningPlanningPlanning forforfor SchoolsSchoolsSchools EdenEden Wells,Wells, MD,MD, MPHMPH Michigan Department of Community Health Influenza Strains •Type A – Infects animals and humans –Moderate to severe illness – Potential epidemics/pandemics • Type B – Infects humans only Source: CDC – Milder epidemics – Larger proportion of children affected •Type C –No epidemics –Rare in humans A’s and B’s, H’s and N’s • Classified by its RNA core – Type A or Type B influenza • Further classified by surface protein – Neuraminidase (N) – 9 subtypes known – Hemagluttin (H) – 16 subtypes known • Only Influenza A has pandemic potential Influenza Virus Structure Type of nuclear material Neuraminidase Hemagglutinin A/Moscow/21/99 (H3N2) Virus Geographic Strain Year of Virus type origin number isolation subtype Influenza Overview • Orthomyxoviridae, enveloped RNA virus •Strains –Type A –Type B –Type C Source: CDC • Further classified by surface protein –Neuraminidase (N) – 9 subtypes known – Hemagglutinin (H) – 16 subtypes known Influenza A: Antigenic Drift and Shift • Hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminadase (NA) structures can change •Drift: minor point mutations – associated with seasonal changes/epidemics – subtype remains the same •Shift:major genetic changes (reassortments) – making a new subtype – can cause pandemic Seasonal Influenza •October to April • People should get flu vaccine • Children and elderly most prone • ~36,000 deaths annually in U.S. Seasonal Effects Seasonal Influenza Surveillance Differentiating
    [Show full text]
  • People, Plagues, and Prices in the Roman World: the Evidence from Egypt
    People, Plagues, and Prices in the Roman World: The Evidence from Egypt KYLE HARPER The papyri of Roman Egypt provide some of the most important quantifiable data from a first-millennium economy. This paper builds a new dataset of wheat prices, land prices, rents, and wages over the entire period of Roman control in Egypt. Movements in both nominal and real prices over these centuries suggest periods of intensive and extensive economic growth as well as contraction. Across a timeframe that covers several severe mortality shocks, demographic changes appear to be an important, but by no means the only, force behind changes in factor prices. his article creates and analyzes a time series of wheat and factor Tprices for Egypt from AD 1 to the Muslim conquest, ~AD 641. From the time the territory was annexed by Octavian in 30 BCE until it was permanently taken around AD 641, Egypt was an important part of the Roman Empire. Famously, it supplied grain for the populations of Rome and later Constantinople, but more broadly it was integrated into the culture, society, and economy of the Roman Mediterranean. While every province of the sprawling Roman Empire was distinctive, recent work stresses that Egypt was not peculiar (Bagnall 1993; Rathbone 2007). Neither its Pharaonic legacy, nor the geography of the Nile valley, make it unrepresentative of the Roman world. In one crucial sense, however, Roman Egypt is truly unique: the rich- ness of its surviving documentation. Because of the valley’s arid climate, tens of thousands of papyri, covering the entire spectrum of public and private documents, survive from the Roman period (Bagnall 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Infectious Diseases: a Review of the Linkages
    TDR/STR/SEB/ST/04.2 SPECIAL TOPICS NO.3 Globalization and infectious diseases: A review of the linkages Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) The "Special Topics in Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research" series are peer-reviewed publications commissioned by the TDR Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural Research. For further information please contact: Dr Johannes Sommerfeld Manager Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural Research (SEB) UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) World Health Organization 20, Avenue Appia CH-1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] TDR/STR/SEB/ST/04.2 Globalization and infectious diseases: A review of the linkages Lance Saker,1 MSc MRCP Kelley Lee,1 MPA, MA, D.Phil. Barbara Cannito,1 MSc Anna Gilmore,2 MBBS, DTM&H, MSc, MFPHM Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum,1 D.Phil. 1 Centre on Global Change and Health London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK 2 European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST) London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK TDR/STR/SEB/ST/04.2 Copyright © World Health Organization on behalf of the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases 2004 All rights reserved. The use of content from this health information product for all non-commercial education, training and information purposes is encouraged, including translation, quotation and reproduction, in any medium, but the content must not be changed and full acknowledgement of the source must be clearly stated.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Epidemiology of Global Smallpox Eradication Smallpox
    History and Epidemiology of Global Smallpox Eradication Smallpox Three Egyptian Mummies 1570-1085 BC Ramses the Vth Died 1157 BC Early Written Description of Smallpox India 400 AD “Severe pain is felt in the large and small joints, with cough, shaking, listlessness and langour; the palate, lips, and tongue are dry with thirst and no appetite. The pustules are red, yellow, and white and they are accompanied by burning pain. The form soon ripens …the body has a blue color and seems studded with rice. The pustules become black and flat, are depressed in the centre, with much pain.” Smallpox and History • In the Elephant war in Mecca 568 AD, smallpox decimated the Ethiopian soldiers • Introduction of smallpox into the new world (Carribean 1507, Mexico 1520, Peru 1524, and Brazil 1555 ) facilitated Spanish conquest • Smallpox destroys Hottentots (1713) • In 1738, smallpox killed half the Cherokee Indian population • Smallpox disrupted colonial army in 1776 Smallpox Control Strategies • Smallpox hospitals (Japan 982 AD). • Variolation 10th Century. • Quarantine 1650s. • Home isolation of smallpox in Virginia 1667. • Inoculation and isolation (Haygarth 1793). • Jenner and widespread practice of vaccination throughout Europe and rest of the world. • Mass vaccination. • Surveillance containment. Variolation Inoculation with Smallpox Pus • Observations: – Pocked marked persons never affected with smallpox – Persons inoculated with smallpox pustular fluid or dried scabs usually had milder disease • Not ideal control strategy – Case fatality rate still 2% – Can transmit disease to others during illness The 1st Smallpox Vaccination Jenner 1796 Cowpox lesions on the hand of Sarah Nelmes (case XVI in Jenner’s Inquiry), from which material was taken for the vaccination of James Phipps below in 1796 History of Smallpox Vaccination 1805 Growth of virus on the flank of a calf in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • On Confinement and Quarantine Concerns on an SEIAR Epidemic
    S S symmetry Article On Confinement and Quarantine Concerns on an SEIAR Epidemic Model with Simulated Parameterizations for the COVID-19 Pandemic Manuel De la Sen 1,* , Asier Ibeas 2 and Ravi P. Agarwal 3 1 Campus of Leioa, Institute of Research and Development of Processes IIDP, University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa (Bizkaia), Spain 2 Department of Telecommunications and Systems Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, 08193 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 3 Department of Mathematics, Texas A & M University, 700 Univ Blvd, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 September 2020; Accepted: 30 September 2020; Published: 7 October 2020 Abstract: This paper firstly studies an SIR (susceptible-infectious-recovered) epidemic model without demography and with no disease mortality under both total and under partial quarantine of the susceptible subpopulation or of both the susceptible and the infectious ones in order to satisfy the hospital availability requirements on bed disposal and other necessary treatment means for the seriously infectious subpopulations. The seriously infectious individuals are assumed to be a part of the total infectious being described by a time-varying proportional function. A time-varying upper-bound of those seriously infected individuals has to be satisfied as objective by either a total confinement or partial quarantine intervention of the susceptible subpopulation. Afterwards, a new extended SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered) epidemic model, which is referred to as an SEIAR (susceptible-exposed-symptomatic infectious-asymptomatic infectious-recovered) epidemic model with demography and disease mortality is given and focused on so as to extend the above developed ideas on the SIR model.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographic Review on the Historical Memory of Previous
    REVISIONES Bibliographic review on the historical memory of previous pandemics in nursing reviews on COVID-19: a secularly documented reality Revisión bibliográfica sobre la memoria histórica de pandemias anteriores en revisiones de enfermería sobre COVID-19: una realidad secularmente documentada Joaquín León Molina1 M. Fuensanta Hellín Gil1 Eva Abad Corpa2 1 Nurse Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia; Advanced Nursing Care Group of the Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Arrixaca. Murcia. Spain. 2 Associate nurse, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía de Murcia; Contracted Professor PhD linked University of Murcia. Advanced Nursing Care Group of the Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Arrixaca. Murcia. Spain. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.456511 Received: 17/11/2020 Accepted: 10/01/2021 ABSTRACT: Introduction: Reviews for COVID-19 should reflect historical antecedents from previous pandemics. Objective: We plan to map the content of recent reviews in the nursing area on COVID-19 to see if it refers to health crises due to epidemics and infectious diseases. Methodology: Descriptive narrative review. The Science Web, PubMed and Lilacs were consulted to identify the reviews; The content of the documents was consulted to detect the presence of descriptors and terms related to pandemics prior to the 21st century of humanity, taking into account the inclusion criteria and objectives of the study. Results: Relevant reviews were found only in 11 documents of the 192 identified. Conclusions: There may be reluctance to use documentation published more than a century ago; However, it would be advisable not to lose the historical memory of pandemic crises that humanity has suffered for millennia Key words: Pandemics; Epidemics; History; Ancient History.
    [Show full text]
  • Haitian Revolution Strategy
    How to Win a War Without Even Shooting: Haitian Revolution Strategy Lynn Gourinski Fahr Overbrook High School Overview Rationale Objectives Strategies Classroom Activities Annotated Biographies/Works Cited/Resources Appendix/Content Standards Overview: The Haitian Revolution largely impacted world history albeit a small country. The war and the success of the enslaved peoples became the forerunner to modern anti- colonialism movements in the Third World and caused the world to pause and think. During the time of the Haitian Revolution (1791-1804), slaves outnumbered white slave owner’s 10:1.(Garrigus, 2006). The western Caribbean was alive with conquests and movement both socially and politically. It was also caught in a whirlwind of disease being brought from place to place-on ships and brought inland through the purchases of goods and slaves. Yellow Fever and Cholera wiped out thousands of persons in the Caribbean islands, many in just a few hours. But why was Haiti not as hard hit by cholera as other nations in the Caribbean. Why did Yellow Fever play such a pivotal role in the successful uprising of slaves? Many diseases might be prevented through good hygiene and development, while others were common to native peoples but wreaked havoc on troops employed to put down revolutions. Such was the case in Haiti, where of the 162,000 troops, up to 40,000 sent by Napoleon, were killed in attempts to reconquer the slaves and restore order in Haiti as Yellow Fever reared it's ugly head to kill many foreign invaders. (Peterson, 1995) Rationale: This curriculum can be taught in history classes for grades 7-12 in conjunction with a health class currently studying a universal hygiene unit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Coronavirus and Its Impact on International Relations
    Vol. 14(3), pp. 116-125, July-September 2020 DOI: 10.5897/AJPSIR2020.1271 Article Number: FA1630564661 ISSN: 1996-0832 Copyright ©2020 African Journal of Political Science and Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJPSIR International Relations Full Length Research Paper The politics of the coronavirus and its impact on international relations Bheki Richard Mngomezulu Department of Political Science, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape, South Africa. Received 7 June, 2020; Accepted 1 July, 2020 Pandemic outbreaks are not a new phenomenon globally. There is plethora of evidence to substantiate this view. However, each epidemic has its own defining features, magnitude, and discernible impact. Societies are affected differently. The coronavirus or COVID-19 is not an incongruity. Although it is still active, thus making detailed empirical data inconclusive, it has already impacted societies in many ways - leaving indelible marks. Regarding methodology, this paper is an analytic and exploratory desktop study which draws evidence from different countries to advance certain arguments. It is mainly grounded in political science (specifically international relations) and history academic disciplines. Firstly, the paper begins by looking at how the coronavirus has affected international relations – both positively and negatively. Secondly, using examples from different countries, it argues that the virus has exposed the political leadership by bringing to bear endemic socio-economic inequalities which result in citizens responding differently to government regulations meant to flatten the curve of infection. Thirdly, in the context of Africa, the paper makes a compelling argument that some of the socio-economic situations found within the continent are remnants of colonialism and apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Justinianic Plague's Origins and Consequences
    The Justinianic plague’s origins and consequences Georgiana Bianca Constantin1, Ionuţ Căluian2 1Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dunarea de Jos University Galati, Romania 2Valahia University Targoviste, Romania Corresponding author: Georgiana Bianca Constantin Abstract The bubonic plague is an extremely old disease (apparentely from the late Neolitic era). The so-called “Justinianic plague”of the sixth century was the first well-attested outbreak of bubonic plague in the history of the Mediterranean world. It was thought that the Justinianic Plague, along with barbarian invasions, contributed directly to the so-called “Fall of the Roman Empire.” Keywords: plague, pandemics, history Introduction The bubonic plague is an extremely old disease, and scientists have detected the DNA of the pathogen that causes it—the bacterium Yersinia pestis—in the remains of late Neolithic era [1]. The limited details in historical texts have led scholars to question whether the causative agent of Justinianic Plague was truly Yersinia pestis, a debate that was only resolved recently through ancient DNA analysis [2-4]. Three major plague epidemics have been recorded worldwide so far: the “Justinian” plague in the 6th century, the “Black Death” in the 14th century and the recent 20th century pandemic [5]. The plague first hit cities in the southeastern Mediterranean, and moved swiftly through the Levant to the imperial capital of Constantinople. It seems that the plague arrived in Constantinople in 542 CE and the outbreak continued to sweep throughout the Mediterranean world for another 225 years, finally disappearing in 750 CE [1,6]. It is difficult to approximate the overall mortality rate due to the 542 plague, because of the lack of demographical data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Evaluation Between the Impact of Previous Outbreaks and COVID-19 on the Tourism Industry Has Been Made Based on Statistics and Previous Research Studies
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2516-8142.htm Impact of A comparative evaluation between COVID-19 on the impact of previous outbreaks the tourism and COVID-19 on the industry tourism industry Gulcin Ozbay, Mehmet Sariisik and Veli Ceylan Received 11 November 2020 Revised 9 January 2021 Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Accepted 10 January 2021 Sakarya, Turkey, and Muzaffer Çakmak Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, Istanbul_ Gelis¸im University, Istanbul, Turkey Abstract Purpose – The main purpose of this study is to make a comparative evaluation of the impacts of previous outbreaks and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the tourism industry. COVID-19 appears to have disrupted all memorizations about epidemics ever seen. Nobody has anticipated that the outbreak in late December will spread rapidly across the world, be fatal and turn the world economy upside down. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, Ebola, Middle East respiratory syndrome and others caused limited losses in a limited geography, thus similar behaviors were expected at first in COVID-19. But it was not so. Today, people continue to lose their lives and experience economic difficulties. One of the most important distressed industries is undoubtedly tourism. Design/methodology/approach – This study is a literature review. In this review, a comparative evaluation between the impact of previous outbreaks and COVID-19 on the tourism industry has been made based on statistics and previous research studies. Findings – The information and figures obtained show that COVID-19 and previous outbreaks have such significant differences that cannot be compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Norovirus Background
    DOH 420-180 Norovirus Background Clinical Syndrome of Norovirus Symptoms Norovirus can cause acute gastroenteritis in persons of all ages. Symptoms include acute onset non- bloody diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain, sometimes accompanied by low-grade fever, body aches, and headache.2,3 Some individuals may only experience vomiting or diarrhea. Dehydration is a concerning secondary outcome.2 Symptoms typically resolve without treatment in 1-3 days in healthy individuals. Illness can last 4-6 days and may manifest more severely in young children elderly persons, and hospitalized patients.2,3 Diarrhea is more common in adults, while vomiting is more common among children.4 Up to 30% of norovirus infections are asymptomatic.2 Incubation The incubation period for norovirus is 12-48 hours.2 Transmission The only known reservoir for norovirus is humans. Transmission occurs by three routes: person-to- person, foodborne, or waterborne.2 Individuals can be infected by coming into contact with infected individuals (through the fecal-oral route or by ingestion of aerosolized vomitus or feces), contaminated foods or water, or contaminated surfaces or fomites.1,2 Viral shedding occurs for 4 weeks on average following infection, with peak viral shedding occurring 2-5 days after infection.2 Norovirus is extremely contagious, with an estimated infectious dose as low as 18 viral particles, indicating that even small amounts of feces can contain billions of infectious doses.2 The period of communicability includes the acute phase of illness up through 48 hours after conclusion of diarrhea. Treatment Treatment of norovirus gastroenteritis primarily includes oral rehydration through water, juice, or ice chips.
    [Show full text]