DOCSLIB.ORG

Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Study Phase II | Report – Final Draft San Francisco Planning Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Study Phase II | Report – Final Draft San Francisco Planning Department Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Study Phase II | Report – Final Draft San Francisco Planning Department Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Study Phase II DRAFT April 2017 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Study Phase II | Report – Final Draft San Francisco Planning Department Table of Contents Page 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 Study Purpose and Role ........................................................................................................................... 3 Timeline ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Planning Context ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Study Partners ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Outreach Summary .................................................................................................................................. 10 3 Existing and Future Conditions ......................................................................................... 11 Transportation Network Overview ....................................................................................................... 11 Land Use .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Zoning ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Major Development and Infrastructure Projects ................................................................................ 19 4 Multi-Modal Facility Concept Alternatives and Evaluation ............................................... 27 Alternatives Development ...................................................................................................................... 28 Concept Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... 30 Multi-Modal Evaluation Approach ....................................................................................................... 39 Evaluation Results ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Technical Feasibility Assessment............................................................................................................ 49 5 Facility and Area Connectivity Assessment ...................................................................... 56 Non-Motorized Connectivity Assessment: Barriers and Opportunities .......................................... 56 Transit Connectivity Assessment ............................................................................................................. 67 Multi-Modal Facility Connectivity Recommendations ........................................................................ 73 6 Economic Development Assessment................................................................................. 74 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Surrounding Neighborhoods .................... 74 Environmental Justice (EJ) ....................................................................................................................... 76 Market Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 78 Impacts on Existing Business and Livability ......................................................................................... 79 7 Funding and Next Steps .................................................................................................... 81 Land Use Context..................................................................................................................................... 81 Preferred Alternative .............................................................................................................................. 82 Multi-Modal Facility Implementation Process ..................................................................................... 82 Funding Opportunities............................................................................................................................. 83 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................. 85 8 Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 86 Glossary of Terms and Acronyms ......................................................................................................... 86 Quantitative Details in Evaluation Measures ...................................................................................... 86 Comments from Open House ................................................................................................................. 89 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Study Phase II | Report – Final Draft San Francisco Planning Department Table of Figures Page Figure 1 Study Area and Caltrain Spatial Gap to Surrounding Uses ..................................................... 2 Figure 2 Preferred Multi-Modal Facility Location - Concept ..................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Sunnydale Avenue Preferred Multi-Modal Facility Location ..................................................... 5 Figure 4 Timeline of Planned Transportation in the Bi-County Area ........................................................ 6 Figure 5 Summary of Priority Development Areas ...................................................................................... 8 Figure 6 Map of Priority Development Areas............................................................................................... 9 Figure 7 Public Meeting at the San Francisco Public Library Visitacion Valley Branch ...................... 10 Figure 8 Existing Weekday Transit Service in Facility Area .................................................................... 12 Figure 9 Existing Muni Ridership and Service Map .................................................................................... 13 Figure 10 Existing and Future Street/Transportation Facilities Near Bayshore Station ..................... 15 Figure 11 Study Area Land Use Map........................................................................................................... 16 Figure 12 Land Uses in Visitacion Valley and Surrounding Developments ........................................... 17 Figure 13 Major Plan Areas and Development Projects in the Bi-County Area .................................. 19 Figure 14 Draft Phasing Map of Schlage Lock Site (Subject to Updates) ............................................ 20 Figure 15 Area under review for California High Speed Rail light maintenance facility ................ 26 Figure 16 Preferred Multi-Modal Facility Location - Concept................................................................. 28 Figure 17 Desired Facility Elements: Design Principles .............................................................................. 30 Figure 18 Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Alternative 1 ............................................................................ 32 Figure 19 Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Alternative 2 ............................................................................ 34 Figure 20 Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Alternative 3 ............................................................................ 36 Figure 21 Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Alternative 4 ............................................................................ 38 Figure 22 Multi-Modal Facility Evaluation Framework ............................................................................. 40 Figure 23 Scoring Legend ............................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 24 Transit Operations and Performance Metrics ........................................................................... 41 Figure 25 Multi-Modal Connectivity Metrics................................................................................................ 43 Figure 26 Vehicular Access Metrics ............................................................................................................... 45 Figure 27 Policy and Implementation Considerations Metrics ................................................................. 47 Figure 28 Developable Area Comparison .................................................................................................. 52 Figure 29 Blocks Immediately Around Facility ............................................................................................ 53 Figure 30 Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility Conceptual Cost Estimate .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • Warm Springs Extension Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report
    Warm Springs Extension Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report May 7, 2015 Prepared jointly by CDM Smith and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Office of Civil Rights 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Section 1: Introduction 6 Section 2: Project Description 7 Section 3: Methodology 14 Section 4: Service Analysis Findings 23 Section 5: Fare Analysis Findings 27 Appendix A: 2011 Warm Springs Survey 33 Appendix B: Proposed Service Options Description 36 Public Participation Report 4 1 2 Warm Springs Extension Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report Executive Summary In June 2011, staff completed a Title VI Analysis for the Warm Springs Extension Project (Project). Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Title VI Circular (Circular) 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients (October 1, 2012), the District is required to conduct a Title VI Service and Fare Equity Analysis (Title VI Equity Analysis) for the Project's proposed service and fare plan six months prior to revenue service. Accordingly, staff completed an updated Title VI Equity Analysis for the Project’s service and fare plan, which evaluates whether the Project’s proposed service and fare will have a disparate impact on minority populations or a disproportionate burden on low-income populations based on the District’s Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden Policy (DI/DB Policy) adopted by the Board on July 11, 2013 and FTA approved Title VI service and fare methodologies. Discussion: The Warm Springs Extension will add 5.4-miles of new track from the existing Fremont Station south to a new station in the Warm Springs district of the City of Fremont, extending BART’s service in southern Alameda County.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Millbrae Station Millbrae
    BASE Schedules & Fares Horario y precios del tránsito 時刻表與車費 Transit For more detailed information about BART Information service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. Millbrae San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective June, 2020 Early Bird Express bus service SamTrans provides bus service Schedule Information e ective August 16, 2020 throughout San Mateo County Transit (BART) rail service connects runs weekdays from 4:00 a.m. to 5:00 Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are available at samtrans.com. The SamTrans Mobile app also provides Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are available on www.bart.gov and the o cial and to Peninsula BART stations, Station the San Francisco Peninsula with a.m., before BART opens. Early Bird both real time information and schedules. Or, call 1-800-660-4287 for schedule information. A quick reference guide BART app. Overhead real time displays can be found on station platforms. A reference guide Caltrain stations, and downtown Oakland, Berkeley, Berryessa, Express bus service connects East Bay, to service hours is shown. Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and to transfer information for trains without direct service is shown. San Francisco, and Peninsula BART stations. San Francisco. For more information visit other cities in the East Bay, as well as San For more information, call 510-465-2278. www.samtrans.com, or call 1-800-660-4287 Departing from Millbrae BART Francisco International Airport (SFO) and or 650-508-6448 (TTY). Mon-Fri Sat Sun/Holidays Route 38 Millbrae Oakland International Airport (OAK).
    [Show full text]
  • Netsci Transportation Information
    The Transportation Information for NetSci 2014 1. SFO to Clark Kerr and Claremont Airport Shuttles from San Francisco International Airport to Clark Kerr and Claremont Hotel Airport shuttles provide door-to-door service. The price is $34 for one person and 15 for additional person. The total occupancy of the shuttle is for 7 people. Reservations are recommended. Bay Porter Express 1-877-467-1800 (Bay Area toll free) • 1-415-467-1800 (outside Bay Area) East Bay Transportation 1-877-526-0304, 1-510-526-0304 Airport Commuter 1-888-876-1777 Taxi Taxi fare to Berkeley will be approximately $78 from the San Francisco airport. http://www.veteranstaxicab.com/ BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) BART is the Bay Area's subway system. The campus is closest to the Downtown Berkeley station on the Richmond line and to the Rockridge station on the Pittsburg/Bay Point line. There is no direct connection to downtown Berkeley from San Francisco on Sundays and evenings. At those times, take the Pittsburg/Bay Point train and transfer to a Richmond train at the 12th Street (Oakland) station (traveling to San Francisco at those times, transfer at MacArthur station). Monday - Friday, 4 a.m. to midnight* Saturday, 6:00 a.m. to midnight* Sunday, 8:00 a.m. to midnight* *In many cases, BART service extends past midnight. Individual station closing times are coordinated with the schedule for the last train, beginning at around midnight. BART trains typically run every 15 minutes on weekdays and every 20 minutes on evenings, weekends and holidays. For exact times, check the following website.
    [Show full text]
  • Track & System Improvements
    TWIN PEAKS TUNNEL Track & System Improvements The Twin Peaks Tunnel, which runs between West Portal and Castro TIMELINE stations, will undergo a major rehabilitation and replacement of its 40+ year old infrastructure, including fixtures that are original to the tunnel, When: circa 1917. The new tracks will improve safety and reliability for Muni trains and keep the tunnel in good working condition. Summer 2018 Planned work includes replacing tracks and track infrastructure, replacing Muni Metro Changes: the drainage system, repairing tunnel walls and ceilings, completing Bus substitute for M Ocean seismic upgrades to the original east entrance of the tunnel (Eureka Valley View and L Taraval; K station), and making structural repairs and inspections. Ingleside operating modified Construction is expected to start summer 2018 during a single closure up train route to 60 days long. Transit service will be modified during construction. Bus Routes Affected: Twin Peaks Tunnel opened for service on February 3, 1918. A vital 48, 57, Nx, L OWL, 91 OWL connection between downtown San Francisco and southern and western neighborhoods, the tunnel carries over 80,000 customers daily. sfmta.com/twinpeaks Taraval Bus Ingleside • SF Zoo via Dewey/Woodside to Castro • Trains will operate between Sloat/St. Francis Station (will not stop at Church or West and Balboa Park Station and continue as Portal Stations) J Church to Embarcadero • Transfer at Sloat/St. Francis for M Ocean Ocean View Bus View or Forest Hill Shuttle buses • Balboa Park via West Portal/Vicente to • Transfer to BART for faster trips Church Station (will not stop at Forest Hill downtown or Castro Stations) To downtown Taraval & WawonaDewey & Woodside Church Castro 48 Taraval & MUNI METRO 14th Ave SF Zoo • J, N, T, and S trains running increased service.
    [Show full text]
  • Muni Metro Guide 1986
    METRO GUIDE INTRODUCTION Welcome to Muni Metro! This brochure introduces you to Muni's light rail system, and offers a full descrip­ tion of its features. Five lines operate in the Muni Metro. Cars of the J, K, L, M and N lines run in the Market Street subway downtown, and branch off to serve dif­ ferent neighborhoods of the city. Tunnel portals are located at Duboce Avenue and Church Street and at West Portal. The light rail vehi­ cles feature high/low steps at center doors. In the subway, these steps remain flush with the car floor and station platforms. For street operation, the steps lower for easy access to the pavement. SUBWAY STATIONS MEZZANINE Muni Metro has nine subway stations: Embarcadero, The mezzanine is the Montgomery, Powell, Civic Center, Van Ness, Church, level immediately below Castro, Forest Hill, and West Portal. the street, where you pay your fare and enter STATION ENTRANCES the Metro system. At Embarcadero, Mont­ Orange Muni or BART/ gomery, Powell, and Muni signposts mark Civic Center Stations, subway entrances on Muni Metro shares the the street. Near the top mezzanine with BART, of the stairs, brown the Bay Area Rapid Transit system. BART and Muni signs list the different maintain separate station agent booths and faregates. Metro lines which stop Muni booths are marked with orange and BART with below. blue. Change machines may be used by all passen­ gers. Ticket machines issue BART tickets only. Though BART and Muni share the mezzanine level, they do not share the same platforms andrai/lines. Be sure to choose the right faregates.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Technical Memoranda
    Combined Technical Memoranda 2.2 – Land Use Background 2.4 – Economic Analysis 2.5 – Operational Needs Assessment 2.7 – Station Operations and Multi-Modal Connectivity 2.8 – Preliminary Feasibility Assessment BAYSHORE MULTI-MODAL FACILITY STUDY Bayshore Multi-Modal Facility study TASK 2.2 LAND USE AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS INTRODUCTION This memorandum summarizes the land use and neighborhood access considerations in planning a Bayshore Multi-Modal (MM) Facility adjacent to the current Caltrain station and along Sunnydale Avenue. The memo identifies nearby opportunities and constraints in a planning a Multi-Modal Facility. Taking into account the Bayshore Intermodal Station Access Study (2012) and the Bi-County Transportation Study (2013), the memo considers Multi-Modal connections and the compatibility of adjacent land uses based on the current understanding (August 2016) of development projects in the area. Figure 1 – Study Area Map, showing Sunnydale Avenue preferred alternative 2.2-1 BAYSHORE MULTI-MODAL FACILITY STUDY STUDY AREA LAND USE The study area , defined as ½-mile from the edges of the Caltrain platforms, is currently a disconnected mix of industrial, formerly industrial and redeveloping areas, adjacent to residential neighborhoods, Bayshore Boulevard and US 101. But the immediate vicinity and the entire Bi-County area are poised for significant growth. The study area is expected to grow by 3,800 housing units and 13,810 jobs. The Multi-Modal Facility will play an important role in connecting these growth areas and existing neighborhoods to various modes of transportation. The major growth areas and projects are summarized in Figure 2 and discussed further in the “Current and Future Development Projects” section.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Coliseum Station Oakland
    Transit Information For more detailed information about BART service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. GA CO Coliseum San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective June, 2020 Amtrak Capitol Corridor Schedule Information effective June 1, 2020 Transit (BART) rail service connects Capitol Corridor intercity rail Station Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are available on www.bart.gov and the o cial the San Francisco Peninsula with serves 18 stations along a 170- Capitol Corridor Bus Connections Capital Corridor Oakland, Berkeley, Berryessa, BART app. Overhead real time displays can be found on station platforms. A reference guide mile rail corridor, and offers a For Bus Take Trains to Sacramento Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and to transfer information for trains without direct service is shown. convenient way to travel between the Auburn, CA 524, 542, 546 & 728 other cities in the East Bay, as well as San Sierra Foothills, Sacramento, the San to Sacramento Colfax, CA 524 & 728 Francisco International Airport (SFO) and to San Jose Reno, NV 524 & 728 Oakland Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley/San q to Auburn Oakland International Airport (OAK). Rocklin, CA 524, 542, 546 & 728 Jose. For information call 1-877-9-RIDECC Sat-Sun/ Sat-Sun/ Mon-Fri Mon-Fri Roseville, CA 524, 542, 546 & 728 or visit capitolcorridor.org. Holidays Holidays Sparks, NV 524 & 728 Trains Without Direct Service RD, CO, GA, SJD Fare Information e ective June, 2020 Train Depart Train Depart Train Depart Train Depart Truckee, CA 524 & 728 511 Real-Time Departures Weekdays and Saturdays 524 7:35a 724 9:08a 521 6:30a 723 8:06a Current fares can be found near ticket 532 1:13p 728 10:59a 523 7:31a 729 10:55a 511 provides free, up-to-the-minute For Train Transfer departure times for the transit vending machines, online at www.bart.gov Fare Information effective June 9, 2014 538 4:02p 738 5:06p 525 8:21a 737 2:08p Antioch Take Richmond train, then transfer at 19th St./Oakland Station.
    [Show full text]
  • TIP Appendix Title Pages
    APPENDIX A – 64 2017 TIP Detail Projects Being Archived Before 2017 TIP Approval 2017 TIP September 28, 2016 Projects Being Archived Before the 2017 TIP Approval 2015 TIP SI. Total Project Funding No. TIP ID Project Name County Sponsor Cost (2015-2018) 1 ALA050006 I-580 (TriValley) Right of ALA ACTC $9,700,000 $0 Way Preservation 2 ALA050015 BART - Warm Springs ALA BART $890,000,000 $69,000,000 Extension 3 ALA050042 ACE: ADA Operating Set- SCL ACE $528,000 $0 aside 4 ALA050043 ACE Signal System ALA ACE $4,579,000 $0 Rehabilitation 5 ALA050064 AC Transit: Transit ALA AC Transit $32,246,878 $4,296,776 Security Projects 6 ALA070018 I-580 (TriValley) Corridor ALA ACTC $136,818,888 $0 - WB HOV & Connectors 7 ALA070020 I-580 (TriValley) Corridor ALA ACTC $179,290,144 $0 - EB HOV Lanes 8 ALA070022 City of Alameda - Park St ALA Alameda $2,495,113 $0 Streetscape 9 ALA070041 I-80 Integrated Corridor ALA ACTC $92,855,000 $0 Mobility Project 10 ALA070046 AC Transit: Zero ALA AC Transit $40,300,000 $0 Emission Bus Advanced Demo 11 ALA070051 BART Station Electronic ALA BART $543,000 $0 Bike Lockers, Ph. 2 12 ALA070060 I-238 Widening ALA Caltrans $4,059,000 $0 Replacement Planting 13 ALA090004 I-580 WB HOT Corridor ALA ACTC $23,393,399 $0 Project 14 ALA090010 I-680/Bernal Avenue ALA Pleasanton $4,000,000 $0 interchange improvements 15 ALA090013 I-580 / Foothill Road ALA Pleasanton $3,750,000 $0 interchange improvements 16 ALA090015 Union City Intermodal ALA Union City $23,019,974 $0 Station Infrastructure 17 ALA090025 I-580 WB Auxiliary Lane, ALA ACTC $1,000,000 $0 First to Isabel 18 ALA090028 I-580 N.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Shuttle Inventory and Analysis
    San Mateo County Shuttle Inventory and Analysis Prepared for the San Mateo County Transportation Authority Prepared by June 2010 Final Report: Shuttle Inventory and Analysis June 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Institutional Overview........................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Geographical Overview ....................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Shuttle Inventory Overview .................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Shuttle Names and Purpose .......................................................................................... 14 4.2 Shuttle Institutional Structure and Funding ................................................................... 14 4.3 Shuttle Performance ...................................................................................................... 17 4.4 Shuttle Service Characteristics ...................................................................................... 20 4.5 Additional Information .................................................................................................... 20 5.0 Performance Benchmarks ................................................................................................. 21 5.1 C/CAG Benchmarks .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Balboa Park Historic Context Statement
    Draft - 8/3/08 Historic Context Statement Balboa Park Area Plan & Historic Resource Survey San Francisco, California August 3 2008 Prepared for the San Francisco Planning Department prepared by TBA West, Inc. 631 Pointe Pacific Drive #6, Daly City, California 94014 650.756.8888 / www.tbaarchitects.com 1 Draft - 8/3/08 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Theme…………………………………………………………...3 A. Time Period B. Period of Significance C. Geographic Limits II. Synthesis of Information/History 6 A. Natural History B. Native Americans C. Spanish-Mexican Periods D. American Period 1. The Industrial School 2. House of Correction/Ingleside Jail 3. San Francisco and San Jose Railroad 4. Ocean Avenue Corridor a. Ingleside Coursing Park b. Ingleside Jail 5. Residential Development 6. Balboa Park - a Rationalistic park 7. Balboa Park Area Transportation History 8. Westwood Park 9. Commercial Development 10. Demographic Patterns III. Balboa Park Area Plan: Architecture 26 A. Property Types B. Commercial Corridors C. Architectural Styles in Subject Area IV. Bibliography……………………………………………………………………..47 V. Appendices 48 A. Study Area Map B. Inventory of Construction Dates, Type, Styles C. Inventory of Character Defining Features 2 Draft - 8/3/08 Exhibit 1: Subject Area, 1878 map of San Francisco, UCLA. I. Introduction and Themes The Balboa Park Area (Subject Area) acts as a hub and boundary line in San Francisco, a crossroad between the Ingleside, Westwood Park, Sunnyside, Excelsior and Outer Mission neighborhoods. It also acts as a crossroad of historic themes: Balboa Park embodies distinctive characteristics of 20th Century recreational landscaping, as naturalistic, romantic treatments of city parks gave way to more rationalistic uses, including the incorporation of civic structures and game fields.
    [Show full text]