DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin 68 Gypsum Resources of New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin 68 Gypsum Resources of New Mexico BULLETIN 68 Gypsum Resources of New Mexico by ROBERT H. WEBER and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI 1959 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable John Burroughs .......................... Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ......................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. ....................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ........................................................................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio .................................................................... Albuquerque John N. Mathews, Jr. ...................................................................... Socorro Richard A. Matuszeski ........................................................... Albuquerque For sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $1.00 Contents Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Purpose and nature of report ....................................................................... 1 Procedure ........................................................................................................ 1 Previous investigations ................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................... 4 PROPERTIES AND ORIGIN OF GYPSUM ........................................... 5 GYPSUM DEPOSITS IN NEW MEXICO ............................................... 7 Stratigraphic occurrence ............................................................................... 7 Pennsylvanian Panther Seep formation ................................................. 7 Permian Abo—Hueco formations ......................................................... 7 Permian Epitaph dolomite ....................................................................... 8 Permian Yeso formation .......................................................................... 9 Permian San Andres formation ............................................................. 10 Permian Whitehorse group .................................................................... 11 Permian Ochoan series ........................................................................... 11 Jurassic Todilto formation ..................................................................... 12 Cretaceous gypsum beds ........................................................................ 13 Tertiary gypsum beds .............................................................................. 13 Quaternary gypsum beds and dunes .................................................... 13 Areal distribution ......................................................................................... 14 Northeastern New Mexico .................................................................... 14 North-central New Mexico .................................................................... 14 San Ysidro—Cuba region ................................................................... 14 Gallina—Rio Chama region ............................................................... 19 Galisteo Creek—Arroyo Tongue region .......................................... 19 Tijeras Basin .......................................................................................... 24 Lamy—Glorieta Mesa region ............................................................. 25 Northwestern New Mexico ................................................................... 25 Mesita—Suwanee region ..................................................................... 25 Mesa Lucero—Rio Salado region ...................................................... 29 Page Central New Mexico ............................................................................... 30 Vaughn—Santa Rosa region ............................................................. 30 Ancho area ........................................................................................... 32 Mesa del Yeso area ............................................................................. 33 Northern Chupadera Mesa—Mesa Jumanes region ..................... 34 Estancia, Encino, and Piños Wells Basins ...................................... 35 West-central New Mexico ..................................................................... 38 South-central New Mexico .................................................................... 38 White Sands ......................................................................................... 38 Caballo Mountains .............................................................................. 41 Nogal Canyon ..................................................................................... 41 Sierra Cuchillo ..................................................................................... 42 San Andres Mountains ....................................................................... 42 Southern Chupadera Mesa ................................................................ 43 Phillips Hills ......................................................................................... 43 Sacramento Mountains ...................................................................... 44 Otero Mesa .......................................................................................... 45 Rio Hondo and Rio Ruidoso valleys ............................................... 46 Southern Robledo Mountains .......................................................... 46 Northern Franklin Mountains .......................................................... 47 Southwesternmost New Mexico ........................................................... 49 Southeastern New Mexico ..................................................................... 50 Pecos Valley ......................................................................................... 51 Yeso Hills ............................................................................................. 52 CHEMICAL ANALYSES ............................................................................. 53 USES AND INDUSTRIAL PREPARATION ........................................... 54 Uncalcined gypsum ..................................................................................... 54 Calcined gypsum .......................................................................................... 56 Chemical uses ............................................................................................... 57 REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 58 INDEX .............................................................................................................. 63 iv Illustrations TABLES Page 1. Chemical analyses ................................................................. Following 52 2. Gypsum products in the United States, 1955 ..................................... 55 FIGURES 1. Surface distribution of Todilto formation, San Ysidro area . 17 2. Surface distribution of Jurassic rocks, Galisteo—Tonque region 20 3. Sketch map of Todilto formation adjoining Arroyo Tongue . 23 4. Surface distribution of Todilto formation, Suwanee area ................. 28 5. Apache Canyon area, Robledo Mountains .......................................... 48 PLATES 1. Index map of gypsum deposits in New Mexico .................... In pocket 2. A. Northern face of White Mesa ........................................ Following 18 B. Eroded surface of massive gypsum in Todilto forma- tion, White Mesa ................................................................................. 18 3. A. Mesita deposit ..................................................................................... 18 B. Gypsum from San Andres formation, Vaughn quarry .................................................................................................... 18 4. A. Crystalline gypsite, Mesa del Yeso ................................................... 18 B. Stabilized gypsum dune sands, Piños Wells Basin . ...................... 18 5. A. Gypsum sand dunes, White Sands National Monu- ment ...................................................................................................... 18 B. Laminated gypsum from Castile formation, Yeso Hills ....................................................................................................... 18 6. Map of White Sands ................................................................... In pocket Introduction PURPOSE AND NATURE OF REPORT This bulletin is designed to satisfy the growing demand for informa- tion concerning gypsum deposits in New Mexico and the possible utilization of known deposits of this mineral. An earlier study by Darton (1920), listing and summarily describing most of the large deposits in the State, is now out of print. Moreover, some smaller deposits of pos- sible local value, not listed by Darton, have been located recently. The utilization of gypsum depends on many factors, which must be con- sidered for each deposit and each locality individually. This report is chiefly a reconnaissance survey of gypsum deposits
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Douglas P. Klein with Plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado
    U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein with plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado Open-file Report 95-506 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. The use of trade, product, or firm names in this papers is for descriptive purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 DEEP SEISMIC CRUSTAL STUDIES .................................. 4 SEISMIC REFRACTION DATA ....................................... 7 RELIABILITY OF VELOCITY STRUCTURE ............................. 9 CHARACTER OF THE SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTION ..................... 13 DRILL HOLE DATA ............................................... 16 BASIN DEPOSITS AND BEDROCK STRUCTURE .......................... 20 Line 1 - Playas Valley ................................... 21 Cowboy Rim caldera .................................. 23 Valley floor ........................................ 24 Line 2 - San Luis Valley through the Alamo Hueco Mountains ....................................... 25 San Luis Valley ..................................... 26 San Luis and Whitewater Mountains ................... 26 Southern
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy, Age, and Rates of Deposition of the Datil Group (Upper
    Stratigraphy,age, and rates of deposition ol the Datil Group (Upper Eocene-Lower0ligocene), west-central New Mexico bySteren M. Cather,Willian C. Mclntosh, and Charles E. Chapin,New Mexico Bureau of Minesand Mineral Resources, Socorro, NM 87801 Introduction Stratigraphyand contacts The Datil Group, formerly called the SpearsFormation, comprises The term Datil Formation was coined by Winchester(1920), but a seriesof volcaniclasticrocks, lava flows, and ash-flow tuffs that its usagehas since evolved considerably(see, for example,Elston, crops out in a broad, west-trending swath of discontinuous expo- 1976;Cather, 1986).In this report, we employ the nomenclatureof suresin west-centralNew Mexico.The Datil Group is the oldestunit Osburn and Chapin (1983),who restrict usage of the Datil Group in the_northern Mogollon-Datil volcanic field, and ranges in thick- to the volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks that occur belowHells Mesa ness from more than 1 km to about 300 m where it onlaps late Tuff. In addition, we divide the Datil Group into two informal units, Laramideuplifts. This report summarizespart of a doctoral disser- the lower Datil and the upper Datil (Fig. 2). tation on the Datil Group (Cathea 1986)and incorporates15 new The lower Datil is dominatedby andesiticvolcaniclastic rocks that {rdiometric datesby Mclntosh et al. (1986),Mclntosh (in progress), are characterizedby phenocrystic plagioclase,amphibole, and ti- C. E. Chapin (unpublished),and Cather (1986).To facilitatediscus- tanomagnetite(+ biotite). Silicacontent in Datil andesitestypically sion of various Datil Group exposureswithin the study area, we rangesfrom 58 Io 64 wt. percent.Throughout most of the northern have divided the outcrop belt into geographicsegments'(Fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for the Recovery of Desert Bighorn Sheep in New Mexico 2003-2013
    PLAN FOR THE RECOVERY OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP IN NEW MEXICO 2003-2013 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish August 2003 Executive Summary Desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) were once prolific in New Mexico, occupying most arid mountain ranges in the southern part of the state. Over-hunting, and disease transmission from livestock are 2 primary reasons for the dramatic decline in bighorn sheep numbers throughout the west during the early 1900s. In 1980, desert bighorn were placed on New Mexico’s endangered species list. From 1992-2003, approximately 25% of bighorn were radiocollared to learn causes of mortality driving this species towards extinction. Approximately 85% of all known-cause non-hunter killed radiocollared individuals have been killed by mountain lions. Despite the lack of a native ungulate prey base in desert bighorn range, mountain lion populations remain high, leading to the hypothesis that mountain lions are subsidized predators feeding on exotic ungulates, including cattle. Lack of fine fuels from cattle grazing have resulted in a lack of fire on the landscape. This has lead to increased woody vegetation which inhibits bighorn’s ability to detect and escape from predators. Bighorn numbers in spring 2003 in New Mexico totaled 213 in the wild, and 91 at the Red Rock captive breeding facility. This is in spite of releasing 266 bighorn from Red Rock and 30 bighorn from Arizona between 1979 and 2002. Several existing herds of desert bighorn likely need an augmentation to prevent them from going extinct. The presence of domestic sheep and Barbary sheep, which pose risks to bighorn from fatal disease transmission and aggression, respectively, preclude reintroduction onto many unoccupied mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Day & Overnight Hikes Guide
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES NEW MEXICO PHOTO BY ERIC “DG”SHAW CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT NEW MEXICO Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail The Land of Enchantment offers many wonderful ELEVATION: Many of these hikes are at elevations CDT experiences! From the rugged Rocky above 5,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, Mountains to the desert grasslands of the sun protection, extra food, and know that a hike at Chihuahuan Desert, the CDT extends for 820 miles elevation may be more challenging than a similar in New Mexico, running through the present-day hike at sea level. and ancestral lands of numerous Native American tribes including the Chiricahua Apache, Pueblo, DRY CLIMATE: New Mexico gets an average of 14 Western Apache, Ute, Diné (Navajo), and Zuni inches of rain for the entire year. You will likely be tribes. New Mexico is home to pronghorn antelope, hiking in a very dry climate, so bring plenty of water roadrunners, gila monsters, javelinas, and turkey and stay hydrated. vultures, as well as ponderosa pines, cottonwoods, aspens, mesquite, prickly pears, and yuccas. NAVIGATION: Download the CDTC mapset at https://continentaldividetrail.org/maps. In this guide, you’ll find the state’s best day and The Guthook Guides phone application also provides overnight hikes on the CDT, organized from south a trail map and user-friendly, crowd-sourced to north. waypoint information for the entire CDT. Hike Types: OUT-AND-BACK POINT-TO-POINT LOOP Southern Terminus Begin at the Mexican border and experience the Big Hatchet Mountains Wilderness Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) by W.C
    NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) By W.C. Butler INTRODUCTION This province covers about 59,000 sq mi, mostly in the southwestern part of the Colorado Plateau. Significant geologic features include the Grand Canyon, Kaibab Arch, Mogollon Highlands transition zone, Monument Uplift, Defiance Uplift, Black Mesa Basin, Holbrook Basin, and southern edges of the Kaiparowits and Blanding Basins. The stratigraphic section shown for northeastern Arizona has demonstrated the highest petroleum potential in Arizona. See Wilson (1962), Butler (1988a), and Dickinson (1989) for synopses of the province's geology and evolution. The lithologically and structurally complex basement of the Colorado Plateau area evolved from northwest-younging Proterozoic terranes sequentially accreted onto the Archean craton. As much as 12,000 ft of Middle and Late Proterozoic strata is preserved in possible rift-aulacogen depositional settings in central Arizona. Thick, unmetamorphosed, organic-rich Late Proterozoic strata deposited in backarc basins or continental lakes of north-central Arizona and south-central Utah have good petroleum potential. The plateau area, as a passive Paleozoic plate margin and buffered Mesozoic retro-arc platform, has been remarkably tectonically stable during Phanerozoic time. The area is characterized by blanket Paleozoic strata, as much as 6,000 ft thick, consisting of mostly shallow marine clastics and carbonates showing numerous disconformities. These strata accumulated during transgressions and regressions from both the northwest and southeast, onlapping and thinning toward the trans-continental arch – a northeast-trending positive area extending from the northeast into central Arizona. Convergence between North and South American tectonic plates, with reactivation of basement blocks, during the late Paleozoic created the plateau's fault-bounded basins and uplifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver and Gold Occurrences in New Mexico by Robert M
    New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Resource Map 15 March 1986 Silver and gold occurrences in New Mexico by Robert M. North and Virginia T. Mclemore New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801 Abstract Anomalous amounts of silver and/or gold have been identified in 153 mining districts or prospect areas of New Mexico. Production from most of these occurrences has been small; figures or estimates are given when known. Thirty-five districts have produced in excess of 10,000 troy ounces of gold or 200,000 ounces of silver. Silver and gold in New Mexico occur in 14 distinct types of deposits ranging in age from Precam­ brian (Proterozoic) to Recent. Mid-Tertiary to Recent deposits include the placer, volcanic-epithermal, supergene copper-uranium (silver), and Great Plains Margin types. Late Cretaceous to mid-Tertiary deposits include the sedimentary-hydrothermal barite-fluorite-galena, carbonate-hosted silver (lead­ manganese ), lead-zinc and copper skarn, Laramide vein, and prophyry-copper types. Late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic deposits include the sedimentary-copper type and possibly some of the Permian Mississippi Valley type. Precambrian deposits include the vein and replacement and Precambrian massive-sulfide types. Deposits that have produced significant silver and/or gold as the primary product are the placer, volcanic-epithermal, Great Plains Margin, carbonate-hosted silver, and Lar­ amide vein types. Deposits that have produced significant precious metals as a byproduct of base­ metal mining include the carbonate-hosted lead-zinc, copper skarn, and porphyry-copper types. Introduction Precious metals in varying degrees of importance or 14 ppm (0.41 oz/ton) silver.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimbres Resource Management Plan (RMP) Preparation Process
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Las Cruces District Office IN REPLY REFER TO: 1800 Marquess St. Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005 1600 (036) December 1993 Dear Reader: This document is the culmination of the Mimbres Resource Management Plan (RMP) preparation process. It contains both the Approved Resource Management Plan and the Record of Decision (ROD). Although this may mark the completion of the land use planning stage, it denotes the beginning of the plan implementation stage. Signed on April 30, 1993, the ROD for the Mimbres RMP records the acceptance of the Proposed RMP (with some modification) as the land use plan for the Mimbres Resource Area, and will shape the management direction of its resources for the next 20 years. Since the approval of the ROD, we have begun implementing the RMP. The Approved RMP as presented in this document will serve as a basis from which both the BLM and the public can track the implementation of the Plan. You will continue to be informed of the progress in implementation through the publication of an Annual RMP Update. This annual update will identify completed actions, as well as actions planned for the coming year, thus enabling you to be involved in specific land management actions. Your continuing interest and involvement in ELM's management of the public land and resources within the Mimbres Resource Area will be the key to successful implementation of the RMP. We look forward to our continued partnership in managing your public land. If you desire more specific information or would like to become more involved in the resource management process, we encourage you to write to the above address or call (505) 525-4352.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Legal Document
    Case 4:20-cv-01494-HSG Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 135 1 DROR LADIN* NOOR ZAFAR* 2 JONATHAN HAFETZ** HINA SHAMSI** 3 OMAR C. JADWAT** AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 4 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 5 Tel.: (212) 549-2500 Fax: (212) 549-2564 6 [email protected] [email protected] 7 [email protected] [email protected] 8 [email protected] 9 * Admitted pro hac vice **Application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming 10 CECILLIA D. WANG (SBN 187782) 11 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 39 Drumm Street 12 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 343-0770 13 Fax: (415) 395-0950 [email protected] 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Additional counsel listed on following page) 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND DIVISION 18 SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER 19 COMMUNITIES COALITION, Case No.: 4:20-cv-01494-HSG 20 Plaintiffs, APPENDIX OF DECLARATIONS IN 21 v. SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 22 DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United JUDGMENT States, in his official capacity; MARK T. ESPER, 23 Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity; and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 24 Security, in his official capacity, Trial Date: None Set Action Filed: February 28, 2020 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ APPENDIX OF DECLARATIONS ISO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO.: 4:20-cv-01494-HSG Case 4:20-cv-01494-HSG Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 135 1 Additional counsel for Plaintiffs: 2 SANJAY NARAYAN (SBN 183227)*** GLORIA D.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by F. Allan Hills and KA Sargent This Map Report Is One of a Series of Geologic and Hydro
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WRI REPORT 83-4118-D MAP SHOWING OUTCROPS OF GRANITIC ROCKS AND SILICIC SHALLOW-INTRUSIVE ROCKS, BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE, NEW MEXICO Compiled by F. Allan Hills and K. A. Sargent INTRODUCTION This map report is one of a series of geologic and hydro- logic maps covering all or parts of the States within the Basin and Range province of the western United States. The map reports contain information on subjects that characterize the geohy- drology of the province, including the ground-water hydrology, ground-water quality, surface distribution of selected rock types, tectonic conditions, areal geophysics, Pleistocene lakes and marshes, and mineral and energy resources. This work is part of the U.S. Geological Survey's program for geologic and hydro- logic evalutaion of the Basin and Range province to identify potentially suitable regions for further study relative to storage of high-level nuclear waste (Bedinger, Sargent, and Reed, 1984). This map report on the granitic rocks and silicic shallow- intrusive rocks of New Mexico was prepared from published geo­ logic maps and reports utilizing the project guidelines of Sargent and Bedinger (1984). The map shows outcrops of mostly plutonic granitic rocks, but also of fine-grained and partly glassy, silicic, shallow-intrusive rocks. The outcrops have been grouped into numbered county areas, which are outlined on the map. The Description of Map Units includes the geologic, and if available, radiometric ages, the lithology, thickness where available, and sources of data. Because the classification of plutonic igneous rocks has changed since publication of many reports used in this study, the rock terminology in the original reports has been converted, where possible, to that adopted by the International Union of Geologic Sciences (IUGS), as reported by Streckeisen (1976).
    [Show full text]
  • EPGS Guidebook
    THE EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY GUIDEBOOK FOURTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY Of THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY AREA DORA ANA COUNTY NEW MEXICO MARCH 14, 1970 CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY AREA DQk ANA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO John W. Hawley - Editor and Cmpi ler GUIDEBOOK FOURTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP of the EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY March 14, 1970 Compiled in Cooperati on with: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso Earth Sciences and Astronomy Department, New Mexi co State University Soi 1 Survey Investigations, SCS, USDA, University Park, New Mexico New Mexico State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS Charles J. Crowley Presi dent El Paso Natural Gas C. Tom Hollenshead Vice President El Paso Natural Gas Carl Cotton Secretary El Paso Indpt. School Dist. Thomas F. Cliett Treasurer El Paso Water Utilities Wi11 iam N. McAnul ty Counci lor Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP Robert D. Habbit Councilor El Paso Natural Gas FIELD TRIP COMMITTEES Guidebook John W. Hawley Edi tor and compi 1er Soi 1 Survey Invest., SCS Jerry M. Hoffer Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP William R. Seager Contributor and editing Earth Sci. Dept. NMSU Frank E. Kottlowski Contributor and editing N. M. Bur. Mines & Min. Res. Earl M.P. Lovejoy Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP William S. Strain Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP Paul a Blackshear Typing Dept. Geol . Sci ., UTEP Robert Sepul veda Drafting Dept. Geol . Sci ., UTEP Caravan Earl M. P. Lovejoy Pub1 icity and Regi stration Charles J.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Doña Ana County
    www.nmwild.org DoñaAna by Stephen Capra When working to protect wild places in New Mexico, one need only look south to see large tracts of wild public lands that have the potential of being put into the National Wilderness Preservation a look at the wildlands of Doña Ana County System. From the Boot Heel to Otero Mesa and north to the Apache Kid and Quebradas, southern New Mexico is, in many ways, some of the wildest coun- try left in the Rocky Mountain West. But like so many other places here, it faces a myriad of threats. From oil and gas drill- ing, to off-road vehicles to urban sprawl, the threats are real. These threats make Wilderness designation essential to the long-term protection of these wild places. Despite the tough political cli- mate related to wilderness, there are indications of a bi-partisan willingness to work together to protect some key areas in Doña Ana County. Wilderness remains one of the best ideas we Americans have ever had. With the passage of the Wilderness Act in 1964, public lands were, for the first time, set aside for their scenic, biologi- cal and recreational value. Protecting OJITO: an area as wilderness prevents oil and NOW IT’S FOREVER gas development, mining, logging and off-road vehicle use, but still allows for cattle grazing and horseback riding and WILD! packing. See Page 3 see Doña Ana, pg. 12 ©2005 Ken Stinnett s t e p h e n c a p r a • e x e c u t i v e d i r e c t o r Notes from the Executive Director As we come to the close of 2005, we can look back and see that it has been a very good year indeed for wilderness in New Mexico.
    [Show full text]