Stratigraphy, Age, and Rates of Deposition of the Datil Group (Upper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphy, Age, and Rates of Deposition of the Datil Group (Upper Stratigraphy,age, and rates of deposition ol the Datil Group (Upper Eocene-Lower0ligocene), west-central New Mexico bySteren M. Cather,Willian C. Mclntosh, and Charles E. Chapin,New Mexico Bureau of Minesand Mineral Resources, Socorro, NM 87801 Introduction Stratigraphyand contacts The Datil Group, formerly called the SpearsFormation, comprises The term Datil Formation was coined by Winchester(1920), but a seriesof volcaniclasticrocks, lava flows, and ash-flow tuffs that its usagehas since evolved considerably(see, for example,Elston, crops out in a broad, west-trending swath of discontinuous expo- 1976;Cather, 1986).In this report, we employ the nomenclatureof suresin west-centralNew Mexico.The Datil Group is the oldestunit Osburn and Chapin (1983),who restrict usage of the Datil Group in the_northern Mogollon-Datil volcanic field, and ranges in thick- to the volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks that occur belowHells Mesa ness from more than 1 km to about 300 m where it onlaps late Tuff. In addition, we divide the Datil Group into two informal units, Laramideuplifts. This report summarizespart of a doctoral disser- the lower Datil and the upper Datil (Fig. 2). tation on the Datil Group (Cathea 1986)and incorporates15 new The lower Datil is dominatedby andesiticvolcaniclastic rocks that {rdiometric datesby Mclntosh et al. (1986),Mclntosh (in progress), are characterizedby phenocrystic plagioclase,amphibole, and ti- C. E. Chapin (unpublished),and Cather (1986).To facilitatediscus- tanomagnetite(+ biotite). Silicacontent in Datil andesitestypically sion of various Datil Group exposureswithin the study area, we rangesfrom 58 Io 64 wt. percent.Throughout most of the northern have divided the outcrop belt into geographicsegments'(Fig 1). Mogollon-Datil volcanic field, the lower Datil Group overlies late Laramide,synorogenic red beds of the EoceneBaca Fbrmation. The contactbetween theseunits is defined as the first up-sectionoccur- renceof megascopicvolcanic detritus (Cather,1980), and is typically marked by a pronounced change from the red colors of the Baca Formationto the grays,buffs, purples, and reddish-graysof the Datil Group. The Baca-Datilcontact is everywhere conformableand gra- dational, exceptwhere early Datil fluvial scouringhas createdlocal, apparently sharp contacts.Where deposited upon late Laramide uplifts, the Datil Group typically overliesstrata of Pennsylvanianor Permianage with angular disconformity;such contactrelations are exposedin the Lemitar Mountains, ChupaderaMountains, southern San Mateo Mountains, MagdalenaMountains, BlackRange, and at Horse Mountain (Fig. i7. In nearly all exposuresthat were examined,non-volcanic detritus identical tb that of the BacaFormation is present throughout most or all of the lower Datil Group (Fig.2). This detritus,-consisting dominantly of fragments of upper Paleozoiclimestone, sandstone, and siltstonewith subordinateamounts of Precambrianlithologies, representsthe continuationof Baca-stylesedimentation during early Datil volcanismand is important becauseit indicatesthe persistence of late Laramidepositive areasfollowinq the onset of volcanismin west-centralNe#Mexico. Abundanceof"non-volcanic detritus in the lower Datil rangesfrom individual bedsof nearlypure Paleozoicand Precambriandetritus to traceamounts of such lithologiespresent as scatteredclasts in volcaniclasticconglomerates. The upper Datil Group consistsof a fundamentallybimodal suite of basalticandesite lava flows, rhyodaciticto rhyolitic ash-flowtuffs, and volcaniclasticrocks derived from theselithologies. Basaltic an- desitesrange in silica content from about 52 to 56 wt. percent, and are characterizedbyphenocrysts of piagioclase,clinopyroxene, and titanomagnetite(+ olintr'te,amphibole). Basalticandesite lavas are widespread in the upper Datil; composite thicknessfor such lava flows locally exceeds150 m (LaRoche,1981). Four ash-flow tuffs of FIGURE l-Location map showing study area, outcrops of Datil Group and regional extent occur in the upper Datil Group. Using the termi- equivalent units, basins of Rio rift, Grande and selected structural and seo- nology of Osburn and Chapin (1983),these are the Datil Well Tuff, morphic features. Intrabasin zonesactive during Datil fault time are shown by Rock House Tuff, Blue Tuff, the heary lines: H.f .2., Hickman fault zone; R.l.f .2., Red Lake fault zone; p.f .2., Canyon Canyon and tuff of Granite Puertecito fault zone. Segmentsof outcrop belt are divided by fine dashed lines Mountain. Unlike the lower Datil Group, the upper Datil does not and are indicated by encircled numbers: 1., Quemado; 2, Alegros Mountain contain non-volcanicdetritus. arca;3, Datil Mountains-Crosby Mountains; 4, Gallinas Mountains area; 5, The contactbetween the lower and upper Datil Group is grada- northern Bear Mountains; 5, Tres Montosas area;7, Magdalena Mountains; tional and typically occurs within the volcaniclasticrocks that un- 8, Nipple Mountain-Granite Mountain; 9, Lemitar Mountiins; 10, Joyita Hills; derlie the basaltic-andesitelava flows and silicic ash-flow tuffs of the 11, northern Jornada del Muerto. Geomorphicfeatures: H, Horse Mountain; upper Datil (Fig. 2). This contact is defined as the first up-section SAB, San Agustin Basin; D, Datil Mountains;'C, Crosby Mountains; Saw, occurrenceof greaterthan 50% basaltic-andesitedetritus. The tran- Sawtooth Mountains; G, Gallinas Mountains; B, Bear Mountains; M, Mag- sition from andesitic to bimodal volcanism, as representedby the dalena Mountains; L, Lemitar Mountains; Ch, Chupadera Mountains; JH, lower Datil-upper Datil contact,marked a time of important loyita Hills; SM, San Mateo Mountains; SC, Sierra Cuihllio; BR, Black Range; changes in tectonism,sedimentation, and petrogenesisin west-central SB, Socorro Basin; AB, Albuquerque Basin; fMB, Jornada del Muerto Basin; New PB, Palomas Basin. Measured and sampled sections are denoted bv solid tri- Mexico(Cather, 1986). The upper contactof the Datil Group is placed angles, | (Cather, 1986). Base map modified from New Mexico'Geological at the base of the Hells Mesa Tuff (-32 Ma), a thick, regionally Society (1982). extensiveash-flow tuff in the northern Mogollon-Datil field. The August 1987 New MexicoGeology Datil-Hells Mesa contactis commonly concealedby talus due to the Location of eruptive centets cliff-formingnature of the Hells MesaTuff. Whereeiposed, however, Although dikes of probable late Datil age have been documented the contact is sharp and typically conformable, except where the in the Hills (Spradlin, 1976)and the northern Bear Mountains, paleovallevs. Joyita Hells Mesa Tuff fills local exposuresof Datil Group eruptive centers have not been docu- During deposition of the Eocenebucu Formation, two intermon- mented anywhere in the northern Mogollon-Datil volcanic field. tane basins (the Bacaand Carthage-LaJoya basins)and their sur- However, the distribution of sedimentary facies and paleoflow in rounding uplifts dominated the late Laramide paleogeographyof Datil volcaniclasticrocks provides important constraintson the lo- west-centralNew Metco (Cathea 1983;Cather and fohnson, 1984, cationof associatedvolcanic centers. For example,paleocurrent and 1985).Late Laramide basin geometriespersisted during Datil vol- faciesdata strongly suggestthat Datil andesiteand basalticandesite paleo- canism, as shown bv similarities in facies distribution and eruptive centers were present along what is now the Socorro Basin current azimuths within the BacaFormation and Datil Group (iather, of the Rio Granderift. This areacoincides with the northern portion 1986).Therefore, the terms Bacabasin and Carthage-LaJoya basin of the Laramide Sierra uplift (Cather, 1.983;Cather and Johnson, 1984; areretained in describingthe sedimentarypaleoenvironments of the 1986), which remained topographically positive throughout Datil Datil Group. Depositionalsystems of the Datil Group are identical time. to and transitionalwith the fluvial-lacustrinefacies tract of the Baca The majority of volcaniclasticdeposits in the Baca basin were Formation,except in the GallinasMountains, Datil Mountains, and derived from the south and southwest(Cather, 1986). Eruptive cen- SawtoothMountains, where debris-flow depositsare a major com- ters of probable Datil age are present in the western part of the of the lower (Cathea ponent Datil Group 1986). Mogollon-Datil volcanicfield (Ratt6et al.,1969;). C. Ratt€,written comm. 1987),and may have supplied detritus to the western portion of the study area. The location of source vents for depositsin the Averogegroin size of Poleoenvi ronmenlo I is not well constrainedbecause of the interoretolion centralpart of the study area sedimentoryrocks lack of Datil-equivalentexposures in the central portion of the Mo- gollon-Datil volcanic field. However, the similarity of facies distri- :::1"'bution and paleoflow between the BacaFormation and Datil Group suggeststhat Datil eruptive centers were developed on, or near, the southernboundary of the Bacabasin (the Laramide Morenci uplif! Cather and Johnson,L984, 1986). Although its geometry and struc- ::l-tural style are poorly understood, the Morenci uplift appears to have undergone mid- and late-Tertiary extension and collapse, to form the SanAgustin Basin and its associatedgrabens to the southwest. Proximol Availabledata suggestthat Datil sourcevents were developedon, fon or near, Laramide positive areasin west-centralNew Mexico. This spatial associationis intuitively reasonablebecause zones of prior Lovo flows Laramide deformation would tend to provide
Recommended publications
  • Petrology, Diagenesis, and Genetic Stratigraphy of the Eocene Baca Formation, Alamo Navajo Reservation and Vicinity, Socorro County, New Mexico
    OPEN FILE REPORT 125 PETROLOGY, DIAGENESIS, AND GENETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE EOCENE BACA FORMATION, ALAMO NAVAJO RESERVATION AND VICINITY, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO APPROVED : PETROLOGY, DIAGENESIS, AND GENETIC STRATIGRAPHYOF THE EOCENE BACA FORMATION, ALAMO NAVAJO RESERVATION AND VICINITY, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO by STEVEN MARTIN CATHER,B.S. THESIS Presented to the Facultyof the Graduate School of The Universityof Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degreeof MASTER OF ARTS THE UNIVERSITYOF TEXAS AT AUSTIN August 1980 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to sincerelythank Drs. R. L. Folkand C. E. Chapin fortheir enthusiasmtoward this study and theirpatience in tutoring a novicegeologist in their respectivefields of expertise. Dr. A. J. Scott provided many helpful comments concerning lacustrinesedimentation and thesisillustrations. Discussions with BruceJohnson contributedgreatly to my understanding of thedistribution of facies and paleoenvironments within the Baca-Eagar basin. I would also like to thank my colleaguesin Austin and e Socorrofor their helpful comments and criticisms. Bob Blodgettserved as studenteditor. Finally, I would like to acknowledge JerryGarcia, who providedunending inspiration and motivation throughout the course of this study. Financialsupport for field work and the writing of this manuscript wa-s generously provided by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines andMineral Resources. The University of TexasGeology Foundationalso provided funds for travel expenses and field work. This thesis was submitted tothe committee in June, 1980. iii PETROLOGY, DIAGENESIS, AND GENETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE EOCENE BACA FORMATION, AIAMO NAVAJO RESERVATION AND VICINITY, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO by Steven M. Cather ABSTRACT The Eocene Baca Formation of New Mexico and. correlative EagarFormation and Mogollon Rim gravels of Arizonacomprise a redbedsequence conglomerate,of sandstone, mudstone,and claystone which cropsout from near Socorro, New Mexico, to the Mogollon Rim of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 NMGS Spring Meeting: Abstract-67
    TOWARD STANDARDIZATION OF PHANEROZOIC STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE IN NEW MEXICO Steven M. Cather1, Kate E. Zeigler2, Greg H. Mack3 and Shari A. Kelley1 1New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Pl., Socorro, NM, 87801, [email protected] 2Department of Natural Resources Management, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM, 87701 3Department of Geological Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003 Recent decades have seen an unprecedented rate of change in the Phanerozoic stratigraphic nomenclature of New Mexico. At the same time, the state has experienced a dramatic resurgence of geologic quadrangle mapping, primarily facilitated by the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992, which enabled the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs. The utility of the new stratigraphic nomenclature has not yet been adequately tested, and in some cases has been opposed by other researchers. Despite a lack of consensus among stratigraphers, it is desirable to have an agreed-upon nomenclature for the purpose of ongoing geologic mapping. We present here, from our perspective as geologic mappers, revisions to the Phanerozoic stratigraphic nomenclature of New Mexico. We hope our discussion will eventually lead to adoption of a standardized nomenclature, for the purposes of mapping, by the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, which administers the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs in New Mexico. Here we criticize, and suggest alternatives to, aspects of recent nomenclatural
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the San Agustin Basin, Alamosa Creek Basin
    Geohydrology of the San Agustin Basin, Alamosa Creek Basin upstream from Monticello Box, and upper Gila Basin in parts of Catron, Socorro, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico By R.G. Myers, J.T. Everheart, and C.A. Wilson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 94-4125 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER OFFICE Albuquerque, New Mexico 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Denver Federal Center Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope...................................................................................................................... 3 Location and extent.................................................................................................................... 3 Ctimate....................................^ 3 Previous hydrologic investigations.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Geologic Plates of Eastern Arizona and Western New Mexico
    Implications of Live Oil Shows in an Eastern Arizona Geothermal Test (1 Alpine-Federal) by Steven L. Rauzi Oil and Gas Program Administrator Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-1 Version 2.0 June, 2009 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 INTRODUCTION The 1 Alpine-Federal geothermal test, at an elevation of 8,556 feet in eastern Arizona, was drilled by the Arizona Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Energy to obtain information about the hot-dry-rock potential of Precambrian rocks in the Alpine-Nutrioso area, a region of extensive basaltic volcanism in southern Apache County. The hole reached total depth of 4,505 feet in August 1993. Temperature measurements were taken through October 1993 when final temperature, gamma ray, and neutron logs were run. The Alpine-Federal hole is located just east of U.S. Highway 180/191 (old 180/666) at the divide between Alpine and Nutrioso, in sec. 23, T. 6 N., R. 30 E., in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest (Fig. 1). The town of Alpine is about 6 miles south of the wellsite and the Arizona-New Mexico state line is about 6 miles east. The basaltic Springerville volcanic field is just north of the wellsite (Crumpler, L.S., Aubele, J.C., and Condit, C.D., 1994). Although volcanic rocks of middle Miocene to Oligocene age (Reynolds, 1988) are widespread in the region, erosion has removed them from the main valleys between Alpine and Nutrioso. As a result, the 1 Alpine-Federal was spudded in sedimentary strata of Oligocene to Eocene age (Reynolds, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Geology and Resources of Uranium in the San Juan Basin and Adjacent Region
    u~c..~ OFR :J8- 'JtgLJ all''1 I. i \ "' ! .SUHMARY OF THE GEOLOGY .ANp RESOURCES OF ,URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT 'REGION, NEW MEXICO, ARIZONA, UTAH & COLORADO I , J.L. Ridgley, et. al. 1978 US. 6EOL~ SURVEY ~RD, US'RARY 505 MARQU51"1"5 NW, RM 72e I .1\LB'U·QuERQ~, N.M. 87'102 i I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY AND RESOURCES OF URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT REGION, NEW MEXICO, A~IZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO 'V'R.0 t ~.-4~ . GICAL SURVEY p.· ..... P• 0 . .:.;J .. _. ·5 ALBU~U~~QUE, N. By Jennie L. Ridgley, Morris W. Green, Charles T. Pierson, • Warren I. Finch, and Robert D. Lupe Open-file Report 78-964 1978 Contents • Page Abstract Introduction 3 General geologic setting 3 Stratigraphy and depositional environments 4 Rocks of Precambrian age 5 .. Rocks of Cambrian age 5 < 'I Ignacio Quartzite 6 Rocks of Devonian age 6... i Aneth Formation 6 Elbert Formation 7 Ouray Limestone 7 Rocks of Mississippian age 8 Redwall Limestone 8 Leadville Limestone 8 Kelly Limestone 9 Arroyo Penasco Group 10 Log Springs Formation 10 Rocks of Pennsylvanian age 11 Molas Formation 11 ~ermosa Formation 12 .' . Ric9 Formation'· 13 .. •;,. Sandia Fotfuatto~ 13 Madera Limestone 14 Unnamed Pennsylvanian rocks 15 • ii • Rocks of Permian age 15 Bursum Formation 16 Abo Formation 16 Cutler Formation 17. Yeso Formation 18 Glorieta Sandstone 19 San Andres Limestone 19 Rocks of Triassic age 20 Moenkopi(?) Formation 21 Chinle Formation 21 Shinarump Member 21 Monitor Butte Member 22 Petrified Forest
    [Show full text]
  • EPGS Guidebook
    THE EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY GUIDEBOOK FOURTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY Of THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY AREA DORA ANA COUNTY NEW MEXICO MARCH 14, 1970 CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY AREA DQk ANA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO John W. Hawley - Editor and Cmpi ler GUIDEBOOK FOURTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP of the EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY March 14, 1970 Compiled in Cooperati on with: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso Earth Sciences and Astronomy Department, New Mexi co State University Soi 1 Survey Investigations, SCS, USDA, University Park, New Mexico New Mexico State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS Charles J. Crowley Presi dent El Paso Natural Gas C. Tom Hollenshead Vice President El Paso Natural Gas Carl Cotton Secretary El Paso Indpt. School Dist. Thomas F. Cliett Treasurer El Paso Water Utilities Wi11 iam N. McAnul ty Counci lor Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP Robert D. Habbit Councilor El Paso Natural Gas FIELD TRIP COMMITTEES Guidebook John W. Hawley Edi tor and compi 1er Soi 1 Survey Invest., SCS Jerry M. Hoffer Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP William R. Seager Contributor and editing Earth Sci. Dept. NMSU Frank E. Kottlowski Contributor and editing N. M. Bur. Mines & Min. Res. Earl M.P. Lovejoy Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP William S. Strain Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP Paul a Blackshear Typing Dept. Geol . Sci ., UTEP Robert Sepul veda Drafting Dept. Geol . Sci ., UTEP Caravan Earl M. P. Lovejoy Pub1 icity and Regi stration Charles J.
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pb Geochronology of Middle–Late Eocene Intermediate Volcanic Rocks of the Palm Park Formation and Orejon Andesite in South-Central New Mexico R.H
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/69 U-Pb geochronology of middle–late Eocene intermediate volcanic rocks of the Palm Park Formation and Orejon Andesite in south-central New Mexico R.H. Creitz, B.A. Hampton, G.H. Mack, and J.M. Amato, 2018, pp. 147-157 Supplemental data available: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/repository/index.cfm?rid=2018004 in: Las Cruces Country III, Mack, Greg H.; Hampton, Brian A.; Ramos, Frank C.; Witcher, James C.; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana S., New Mexico Geological Society 69th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 218 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2018 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Vertebrates from Socorro County, Central New Mexico Gary S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/60 Cenozoic vertebrates from Socorro County, central New Mexico Gary S. Morgan, Spencer G. Lucas, and David W. Love, 2009, pp. 321-336 in: Geology of the Chupadera Mesa, Lueth, Virgil; Lucas, Spencer G.; Chamberlin, Richard M.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 60th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 438 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2009 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Rockhound Guide
    New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Socorro, New Mexico Information: 505-835-5420 Publications: 505-83-5490 FAX: 505-835-6333 A Division of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Dear “Rockhound” Thank you for your interest in mineral collecting in New Mexico. The New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources has put together this packet of material (we call it our “Rockhound Guide”) that we hope will be useful to you. This information is designed to direct people to localities where they may collect specimens and also to give them some brief information about the area. These sites have been chosen because they may be reached by passenger car. We hope the information included here will lead to many enjoyable hours of collecting minerals in the “Land of Enchantment.” Enjoy your excursion, but please follow these basic rules: Take only what you need for your own collection, leave what you can’t use. Keep New Mexico beautiful. If you pack it in, pack it out. Respect the rights of landowners and lessees. Make sure you have permission to collect on private land, including mines. Be extremely careful around old mines, especially mine shafts. Respect the desert climate. Carry plenty of water for yourself and your vehicle. Be aware of flash-flooding hazards. The New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources has a whole series of publications to assist in the exploration for mineral resources in New Mexico. These publications are reasonably priced at about the cost of printing. New Mexico State Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Bulletin 87, “Mineral and Water Resources of New Mexico,” describes the important mineral deposits of all types, as presently known in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Borderlands Wind Project Final Environmental Impact Statement
    APPENDIX H: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NEW MEXICO STATE OFFICE GROUNDWATER IMPACT ANALYSIS Borderlands Wind Project Final EIS and Proposed RMP Amendment March 2020 Appendix H: Bureau of Land Management New Mexico State Office Groundwater Impact Analysis Page Left Intentionally Blank Borderlands Wind Project Final EIS and Proposed RMP Amendment March 2020 Appendix H: Bureau of Land Management New Mexico State Office Groundwater Impact Analysis Borderlands Wind Project Regional Geology and Estimated Aquifer Drawdown J. Burgess-Conforti1, C. Durr2, D. Herrell1 1. Bureau of Land Management – New Mexico State Office 2. Bureau of Land Management – Las Cruces District Office Location of Permitted Wells Borderlands Wind, LLC (a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC) is proposing development of an up to 100-megawatt (MW) wind-powered electrical generation facility in western Catron County, New Mexico (NM). The Borderlands Wind Project (BLWP) would be built near the Arizona (AZ)–NM border south of U.S. Highway 60 (U.S. 60). Wind turbines and ancillary facilities, such as access roads, underground collection lines, and substation/switchyard areas, would be located on lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Socorro Field Office (SFO), New Mexico State Land Office (NMSLO)-owned lands, and privately owned lands. Construction activities would require approximately 26 million gallons of water and would be pumped from an existing private well and conveyed through aboveground piping. Water rights would remain with the private well owner. A new 5- to 6- gal min-1 well would be drilled for operation and maintenance (O&M) water use with an estimated withdrawal at 140,800 gal yr-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955
    Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955 ^GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A Names of North America Introduced in 1936-1955 By DRUID WILSON, WILLIAM J. SANDO? and RUDOLPH W. KOPF Prepared with the assistance of BARBARA BEDETTE, JEAN L. EGGLETON, GRACE C. KEROHER, CAROLYN MANN, WILLIAM G. MELTON, JR., KATHERINE DENNISON PALMER, and JACK E. SMEDLEY GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA -G E O L O G I C AL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A A compilation of new geologic names of North America, including Greenland, the finest Indies, the Pacific Island pos­ sessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director ' For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1. (paper cover) FOEEWOBD The "Lexicon of geologic names of the United States" by M. Grace Wilmarth, published in 1938 and reprinted in 1951 and 1957, met a long standing need and continuing demand for a compilation of geologic names. Plans made for future compilations as new names and revisions appeared were interrupted during the years of World War II. In 1952 a sustained effort was begun toward review of geo­ logic publications necessary to furnish a background for preparation of a new edition. After the review was brought up to date in 1956, the present compilation was prepared in order to furnish to the geo­ logic profession, as quickly as possible, some of the essential data concerning the new names that have appeared since 1935.
    [Show full text]