DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of the Geology and Resources of Uranium in the San Juan Basin and Adjacent Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

u~c..~ OFR :J8- 'JtgLJ all''1 I. i \ "' ! .SUHMARY OF THE GEOLOGY .ANp RESOURCES OF ,URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT 'REGION, NEW MEXICO, ARIZONA, UTAH & COLORADO I , J.L. Ridgley, et. al. 1978 US. 6EOL~ SURVEY ~RD, US'RARY 505 MARQU51"1"5 NW, RM 72e I .1\LB'U·QuERQ~, N.M. 87'102 i I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY AND RESOURCES OF URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT REGION, NEW MEXICO, A~IZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO 'V'R.0 t ~.-4~ . GICAL SURVEY p.· ..... P• 0 . .:.;J .. _. ·5 ALBU~U~~QUE, N. By Jennie L. Ridgley, Morris W. Green, Charles T. Pierson, • Warren I. Finch, and Robert D. Lupe Open-file Report 78-964 1978 Contents • Page Abstract Introduction 3 General geologic setting 3 Stratigraphy and depositional environments 4 Rocks of Precambrian age 5 .. Rocks of Cambrian age 5 < 'I Ignacio Quartzite 6 Rocks of Devonian age 6... i Aneth Formation 6 Elbert Formation 7 Ouray Limestone 7 Rocks of Mississippian age 8 Redwall Limestone 8 Leadville Limestone 8 Kelly Limestone 9 Arroyo Penasco Group 10 Log Springs Formation 10 Rocks of Pennsylvanian age 11 Molas Formation 11 ~ermosa Formation 12 .' . Ric9 Formation'· 13 .. •;,. Sandia Fotfuatto~ 13 Madera Limestone 14 Unnamed Pennsylvanian rocks 15 • ii • Rocks of Permian age 15 Bursum Formation 16 Abo Formation 16 Cutler Formation 17. Yeso Formation 18 Glorieta Sandstone 19 San Andres Limestone 19 Rocks of Triassic age 20 Moenkopi(?) Formation 21 Chinle Formation 21 Shinarump Member 21 Monitor Butte Member 22 Petrified Forest Member and Sonsela Sandstone Bed 22 Owl Rock Member 23 • Agua Zarca Sandstone Member and sandstone member 24 Salitral Shale Tongue and Poleo Sandstone Lentil 25 Dolores Formation 26 Wingate Sandstone 27 Rocks of Jurassic age 28 San Rafael Group 29 Carmel Formation 29 Entrada Sandstone 30 Todilto Limestone 31 Summerville Formation 31 Bluff Sandstone 32 • Cow Springs Sandstone 33 iii Morrison Formation 33 Salt Wash Member 34 • Recapture Creek Member 35 Westwater Canyon Sandstone Member 36 Brushy Basin Member 38 Rocks of Cretaceous age 39 Burro Canyon Formation 40 Dakota Sandstone 41 Mancos Shale 41 Mesaverde Group 42 Gallup Sandstone 42 Crevasse Canyon Formation 43 Point Lookout Sandstone 43 Menefee Formation 44 Cliff House Sandstone 44 • Lewis Shale 45 Pictured Cliffs Sandstone 45 Fruitland Formation 46 Kirtland Shale 47 Animas Formation 47 Rocks of Tertiary age 48 San Juan Basin 48 Ojo Alamo Sandstone 49 Nacimiento Formation 49 San Jose Formation 50 Chuska Sandstone 50 iv • Igneous rocks in the San Juan Basin and vicinity 51 • Chama Basin 53 El Rite Formation 53 Abiquiu Tuff of the Santa Fe Group 53 Los Pinos Formation 54 Igneous rocks in the Chama Basin 54 Southern section 54 Baca Formation 54 Datil Formation 55 Santa Fe Group 55 Structural geology 56 Geologic history 58 Paleontology 66 • Uranium deposits, production, reserves, and resources 69 Location of uranium mining districts and ore reserve areas 69 History of uranium discovery and production 69 Uranium occurrences and deposits 71 General 71 Uranium in Precambrian rocks 73 '"';~~ Uranium in Paleozoic rocks 73 \ Uranium in Mesozoic rocks 73 Uranium in Triassic rocks 73 Uranium in Jurassic rocks 74 Uranium in Cretaceous rocks 75 Uranium in Cenozoic rocks 76 Origin of the deposits 76 • v Uranium production, reserves, and resources 77 • Selected bibliography 84 • vi • • Illustrations (Plates in pocket) Plate 1. Generalized geologic map of the San Juan Basin and adjacent region, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah 2. Preliminary map showing principal areas of known uranium occurrences, prospects, mines and undeveloped deposits in the San Juan Basin and vicinity. Figures • Page Figure 1. Index map of the San Juan Basin and vicinity, showing locations of uranium districts and ore reserve areas-----70 Tables Table 1. Product1on from the San Juan Basin, 1948-1976---------------79 Table 2. Uranium reserves for resource areas in the San Juan Basin---81 Table 3. Potential uranium resources in the San Juan Basin-----------82 • vii • SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY AND RESOURCES OF URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT REGION, NEW MEXICO, ARIZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO By Jennie L. Ridgley, Morris W. Green, Charles T. Pierson, Warren I. Finch, and Robert D. Lupe ABSTRACT The San Juan Basin and adjacent region lie predominantly in the southeastern part of the uranium-rich Colorado Plateau of New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, and Colorado. Underlying the province are rocks of the Precambrian basement complex composed mainly of igneous and metamorphic • rocks; a thickness of about 3,600 meters of generally horizontal Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks; and a variety of Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic igneous rocks. Sedimentary rocks of the sequence are commonly eroded and well exposed near the present basin margins where Tertiary tectonic activity has uplifted, folded, and faulted the sequence into its present geologic configuration of basins, platforms, monoclines, and other related structural features. Sedimentary rocks of Jurassic age in the southern part of the San Juan Basin contain the largest uranium deposits in the United States, and offer the promise of additional uranium deposits. Elsewhere in the basin and the adjacent Colorado Plateau, reserves and resources of uranium are known primarily in Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous • strata. Only scattered occurrences of uranium are known in Paleozoic sedimentary rocks or in Tertiary sedimentary and igneous rocks. Although uranium occurs in several formations and rock types within • the area, the most important uranium deposits are contained in sandstone facies of the sequence, where geochemical and sedimentological conditions were most suitable for concentration of uranium. The distribution of sandstone and other favorable facies is controlled by the special distribution and association of sedimentary depositional environments operative during past geologic periods in the basin and on the Colorado Plateau. These environments of sedimentary deposition included a variety of both marine and continental types, such as deep and shallow marine, marginal marine, evaporite basin, fluvial, lacustrine, and desert eolian and sabkha (small, subsurface recharged, interdune ponds and lakes). Uranium is most commonly associated with ancient continental stream (fluvial) and lake (lacustrine) deposits of • Jurassic age and marginal marine deposits of Cretaceous age. Most of the 120;000 tons of u o produced in the area came from the 3 8 Westwater Canyon and Brushy Basin Members of the Morrison Formation. The largest proportion of the reserves of 465,500 tons of u o (at 3 8 $50-per-pound forward cost) are in the area between Gallup and Laguna, New Mexico. Potential uranium resources, most of which remain undiscovered, total 826,600 tons at $30-per-pound forward cost and u3o8 are in the southern San Juan basin. The total resource base for the basin is about 1,500,000 tons u3o8 at a forward cost of $50-per-pound. 2 • • INTRODUCTION The following report has been compiled for the purpose of providing . a summary of the geology and uranium-resources of the San Juan Basin and adjacent region of New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, and Colorado (plates and 2). This report supplements the Interior Department-sponsored San Juan Basin Regional Uranium Study project, which has as its primary objective the gathering of information pertinent to the analysis of the effects and impacts of future uranium developments on the natural and human environments in the region through the year 2000. Material contained in this report has been synthesized primarily from literature written during the past 10 years on the geology and uranium resources of the region. The report has been composed for the governmental decisionmaker; however, the authors hope that it will also be of value to the explorationist seeking a broad overview of the • regional geology and its relationship to mineral occurrence. The authors express appreciation to the personnel of the Grand Junction, Colorado, and Albuquerque, New Mexico, offices of the U.S. Department of Energy for their cooperation and aid in providing uranium resource data for this report. GENERAL GEOLOGIC SETTING The San Juan Basin and vicinity (plate 1) lies mainly within the southeastern part of the Colorado Plateau physiographic province. This province, which comprises an area of approximately 390,000 square kilometers, lies within the states of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Underlying the province are: (1) a Precambrian basement complex • 3 composed mainly of igneous and metamorphic rocks; (2) a thickness of • about 3,600 m of generally flat-lying Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks; and (3) a variety of Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic igneous rocks. Uplifts and related downwarps and platforms, as well as faults and monoclinal folds are locally present. These structural features and the rocks they disrupt are discussed in later sections of this report. In addition, sedimentary rocks present south of the map area (plate 1). and north of Socorro, New Mexico, are briefly discussed, as many of these rock units represent southern extensions of rock units present in the San Juan Basin. This discussion was included in order to provide a more complete picture of the stratigraphy and depositional environments of the map area. STRATIGRAPHY AND DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS Rocks exposed iri the San Juan Basin and adjacent areas range in age • from Precambrian to Tertiary. Sedimentary rocks, which are dominantly sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, and limestone, were deposited in a variety of continental and marine environments.; Basaltic to granitic igneous rocks were formed under various intrusive and extrusive conditions. Uranium is known in a number of sedimentary formations and is generally associated with rocks of fluvial and lacustrine origin. Many occurrences of uranium in the area are not economic; however, the largest deposits in the United States occur in members of the Morrison Formation of Jurassic age.
Recommended publications
  • Narbonapass.Pdf

    Narbonapass.Pdf

    FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG 1 FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG, FROM GALLUP TO GAMERCO, YAH-TA-HEY, WINDOW ROCK, FORT DEFIANCE, NAVAJO, TODILTO PARK, CRYSTAL, NARBONA PASS, SHEEP SPRINGS, TOHATCHI AND GALLUP SPENCER G. LUCAS, STEVEN C. SEMKEN, ANDREW B. HECKERT, WILLIAM R. BERGLOF, First-day Road Log GRETCHEN HOFFMAN, BARRY S. KUES, LARRY S. CRUMPLER AND JAYNE C. AUBELE ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ ������ ������ �������� Distance: 141.8 miles ������� Stops: 5 ���� ������ ������ SUMMARY ������ �� ������ �� ����� �� The first day’s trip takes us around the southern �� �� flank of the Defiance uplift, back over it into the �� southwestern San Juan Basin and ends at the Hogback monocline at Gallup. The trip emphasizes Mesozoic— especially Jurassic—stratigraphy and sedimentation in NOTE: Most of this day’s trip will be conducted the Defiance uplift region. We also closely examine within the boundaries of the Navajo (Diné) Nation under Cenozoic volcanism of the Navajo volcanic field. a permit from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department. Stop 1 at Window Rock discusses the Laramide Persons wishing to conduct geological investigations Defiance uplift and introduces Jurassic eolianites near on the Navajo Nation, including stops described in this the preserved southern edge of the Middle-Upper guidebook, must first apply for and receive a permit Jurassic depositional basin. At Todilto Park, Stop 2, from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department, P.O. we examine the type area of the Jurassic Todilto For- Box 1910, Window Rock, Arizona, 86515, 928-871- mation and discuss Todilto deposition and economic 6587. Sample collection on Navajo land is forbidden. geology, a recurrent theme of this field conference. From Todilto Park we move on to the Green Knobs diatreme adjacent to the highway for Stop 3, and then to Stop 4 at the Narbona Pass maar at the crest of the Chuska Mountains.
  • Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado by Peter W

    Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado by Peter W

    Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado By Peter W. Lipman Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Investigations Series I–2799 dacite Ceobolla Creek Tuff Nelson Mountain Tuff, rhyolite Rat Creek Tuff, dacite Cebolla Creek Tuff Rat Creek Tuff, rhyolite Wheeler Geologic Monument (Half Moon Pass quadrangle) provides exceptional exposures of three outflow tuff sheets erupted from the San Luis caldera complex. Lowest sheet is Rat Creek Tuff, which is nonwelded throughout but grades upward from light-tan rhyolite (~74% SiO2) into pale brown dacite (~66% SiO2) that contains sparse dark-brown andesitic scoria. Distinctive hornblende-rich middle Cebolla Creek Tuff contains basal surge beds, overlain by vitrophyre of uniform mafic dacite that becomes less welded upward. Uppermost Nelson Mountain Tuff consists of nonwelded to weakly welded, crystal-poor rhyolite, which grades upward to a densely welded caprock of crystal-rich dacite (~68% SiO2). White arrows show contacts between outflow units. 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Geologic setting . 1 Volcanism . 1 Structure . 2 Methods of study . 3 Description of map units . 4 Surficial deposits . 4 Glacial deposits . 4 Postcaldera volcanic rocks . 4 Hinsdale Formation . 4 Los Pinos Formation . 5 Oligocene volcanic rocks . 5 Rocks of the Creede Caldera cycle . 5 Creede Formation . 5 Fisher Dacite . 5 Snowshoe Mountain Tuff . 6 Rocks of the San Luis caldera complex . 7 Rocks of the Nelson Mountain caldera cycle . 7 Rocks of the Cebolla Creek caldera cycle . 9 Rocks of the Rat Creek caldera cycle . 10 Lava flows premonitory(?) to San Luis caldera complex . .11 Rocks of the South River caldera cycle .
  • Late Paleozoic Tectonic and Sedimentologic History of the Penasco Uplift, North-Central New Mexico

    Late Paleozoic Tectonic and Sedimentologic History of the Penasco Uplift, North-Central New Mexico

    RICE UNIVERSITY LATE PALEOZOIC TECTONIC AND SEDIMENTOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE PENASCO UPLIFT, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO by ROY DONALD ADAMS A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: 0^ (3- /jtd&i obfe B. Anderson, Chairman Assistant Professor pf Geology KT Rudy R. Schwarzer, Adjunct Assistant Professor of GSology John /E. Warme Professor of Geology Donald R. Baker Professor of Geology Houston, Texas May, 1980 ABSTRACT LATE PALEOZOIC TECTONIC AND SEDIMENTOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE PENASCO UPLIFT, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO Roy Donald Adams The Paleozoic Peiiasco Uplift, located on the site of the present Nacimiento Mountains of north-central New Mexico, acted as a sediment source and modifier of regional sedimentation patterns from Middle Pennsylvanian to Early Permian time. The earliest history of the uplift is still poorly defined. Orogenic activity may have started as early as the Late Mississippian, or there may have been quiescence until after deposition of the Morrow-age Osha Canyon Formation and prior to deposition of the Atoka-age Sandia Formation. Coarse, arkosic siliciclastic sediments inter- bedded with fossilferious carbonates in the Madera Formation indicate that by early Desmoinesian time the Peiiasco Uplift had risen sufficiently to expose and erode Precambrian rocks. Paleotransport indicators in the arkosic sediments show transport away from the uplift. Throughout the remainder of the Pennsylvanian, the Peiiasco Uplift was a sediment source. The siliciclastic sediments derived from the Peiiasco Uplift formed a wedge that prograded out onto and interfingered with carbonate sediments of a shallow normal marine shelf. A change in paleotransport directions from northeasterly to southwesterly occurs on the east side of the Peiiasco Uplift and is due to the arrival of a flood of siliciclastic sediments derived from the Uncompahgre-San Luis Uplift to the northeast.
  • PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B

    PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B

    PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms.
  • Petrology, Diagenesis, and Genetic Stratigraphy of the Eocene Baca Formation, Alamo Navajo Reservation and Vicinity, Socorro County, New Mexico

    Petrology, Diagenesis, and Genetic Stratigraphy of the Eocene Baca Formation, Alamo Navajo Reservation and Vicinity, Socorro County, New Mexico

    OPEN FILE REPORT 125 PETROLOGY, DIAGENESIS, AND GENETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE EOCENE BACA FORMATION, ALAMO NAVAJO RESERVATION AND VICINITY, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO APPROVED : PETROLOGY, DIAGENESIS, AND GENETIC STRATIGRAPHYOF THE EOCENE BACA FORMATION, ALAMO NAVAJO RESERVATION AND VICINITY, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO by STEVEN MARTIN CATHER,B.S. THESIS Presented to the Facultyof the Graduate School of The Universityof Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degreeof MASTER OF ARTS THE UNIVERSITYOF TEXAS AT AUSTIN August 1980 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to sincerelythank Drs. R. L. Folkand C. E. Chapin fortheir enthusiasmtoward this study and theirpatience in tutoring a novicegeologist in their respectivefields of expertise. Dr. A. J. Scott provided many helpful comments concerning lacustrinesedimentation and thesisillustrations. Discussions with BruceJohnson contributedgreatly to my understanding of thedistribution of facies and paleoenvironments within the Baca-Eagar basin. I would also like to thank my colleaguesin Austin and e Socorrofor their helpful comments and criticisms. Bob Blodgettserved as studenteditor. Finally, I would like to acknowledge JerryGarcia, who providedunending inspiration and motivation throughout the course of this study. Financialsupport for field work and the writing of this manuscript wa-s generously provided by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines andMineral Resources. The University of TexasGeology Foundationalso provided funds for travel expenses and field work. This thesis was submitted tothe committee in June, 1980. iii PETROLOGY, DIAGENESIS, AND GENETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE EOCENE BACA FORMATION, AIAMO NAVAJO RESERVATION AND VICINITY, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO by Steven M. Cather ABSTRACT The Eocene Baca Formation of New Mexico and. correlative EagarFormation and Mogollon Rim gravels of Arizonacomprise a redbedsequence conglomerate,of sandstone, mudstone,and claystone which cropsout from near Socorro, New Mexico, to the Mogollon Rim of Arizona.
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Sierra Nacimiento and Vicinity, New

    Geology and Mineral Resources of Sierra Nacimiento and Vicinity, New

    iv Contents ABSTRACT 7 TERTIARY-QUATERNARY 47 INTRODUCTION 7 QUATERNARY 48 LOCATION 7 Bandelier Tuff 48 PHYSIOGRAPHY 9 Surficial deposits 48 PREVIOUS WORK 9 PALEOTECTONIC SETTING 48 ROCKS AND FORMATIONS 9 REGIONAL TECTONIC SETTING 49 PRECAMBRIAN 9 STRUCTURE 49 Northern Nacimiento area 9 NACIMIENTO UPLIFT 49 Southern Nacimiento area 15 Nacimiento fault 51 CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN (?) 20 Pajarito fault 52 MISSISSIPPIAN 20 Synthetic reverse faults 52 Arroyo Peñasco Formation 20 Eastward-trending faults 53 Log Springs Formation 21 Trail Creek fault 53 PENNSYLVANIAN 21 Antithetic reverse faults 53 Osha Canyon Formation 23 Normal faults 53 Sandia Formation 23 Folds 54 Madera Formation 23 SAN JUAN BASIN 55 Paleotectonic interpretation 25 En echelon folds 55 PERMIAN 25 Northeast-trending faults 55 Abo Formation 25 Synclinal bend 56 Yeso Formation 27 Northerly trending normal faults 56 Glorieta Sandstone 30 Antithetic reverse faults 56 Bernal Formation 30 GALLINA-ARCHULETA ARCH 56 TRIASSIC 30 CHAMA BASIN 57 Chinle Formation 30 RIΟ GRANDE RIFT 57 JURASSIC 34 JEMEZ VOLCANIC FIELD 59 Entrada Sandstone 34 TECTONIC EVOLUTION 60 Todilto Formation 34 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES 63 Morrison Formation 34 COPPER 63 Depositional environments 37 Mineralization 63 CRETACEOUS 37 Origin 67 Dakota Formation 37 AGGREGATE 69 Mancos Shale 39 TRAVERTINE 70 Mesaverde Group 40 GYPSUM 70 Lewis Shale 41 COAL 70 Pictured Cliffs Sandstone 41 ΗUMΑTE 70 Fruitland Formation and Kirtland Shale URANIUM 70 undivided 42 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY 72 TERTIARY 42 OIL AND GAS 72 Ojo Alamo Sandstone
  • Forgotten Crocodile from the Kirtland Formation, San Juan Basin, New

    Forgotten Crocodile from the Kirtland Formation, San Juan Basin, New

    posed that the narial cavities of Para- Wima1l- saurolophuswere vocal resonating chambers' Goniopholiskirtlandicus Apparently included with this material shippedto Wiman was a partial skull that lromthe Wiman describedas a new speciesof croc- forgottencrocodile odile, Goniopholis kirtlandicus. Wiman publisheda descriptionof G. kirtlandicusin Basin, 1932in the Bulletin of the GeologicalInstitute KirtlandFormation, San Juan of IJppsala. Notice of this specieshas not appearedin any Americanpublication. Klilin NewMexico (1955)presented a descriptionand illustration of the speciesin French, but essentially repeatedWiman (1932). byDonald L. Wolberg, Vertebrate Paleontologist, NewMexico Bureau of lVlinesand Mineral Resources, Socorro, NIM Localityinformation for Crocodilian bone, armor, and teeth are Goni o p holi s kir t landicus common in Late Cretaceous and Early Ter- The skeletalmaterial referred to Gonio- tiary deposits of the San Juan Basin and pholis kirtlandicus includesmost of the right elsewhere.In the Fruitland and Kirtland For- side of a skull, a squamosalfragment, and a mations of the San Juan Basin, Late Creta- portion of dorsal plate. The referral of the ceous crocodiles were important carnivores of dorsalplate probably represents an interpreta- the reconstructed stream and stream-bank tion of the proximity of the material when community (Wolberg, 1980). In the Kirtland found. Figs. I and 2, taken from Wiman Formation, a mesosuchian crocodile, Gonio- (1932),illustrate this material. pholis kirtlandicus, discovered by Charles H. Wiman(1932, p. 181)recorded the follow- Sternbergin the early 1920'sand not described ing locality data, provided by Sternberg: until 1932 by Carl Wiman, has been all but of Crocodile.Kirtland shalesa 100feet ignored since its description and referral. "Skull below the Ojo Alamo Sandstonein the blue Specimensreferred to other crocodilian genera cley.
  • Geology of the Cebolla Quadrangle, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico

    Geology of the Cebolla Quadrangle, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico

    BULLETIN 92 Geology of the Cebolla Quadrangle Rio Arriba County, New Mexico by HUGH H. DONEY 1 9 6 8 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Acting Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable David F. Cargo ...................................... Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo ................................................. Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS William G. Abbott .........................................................................................Hobbs Henry S. Birdseye ............................................................................... Albuquerque Thomas M. Cramer ................................................................................... Carlsbad Steve S. Torres, Jr. ....................................................................................... Socorro Richard M. Zimmerly .................................................................................... Socorro For sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex. 87801—Price $3.00 Abstract The Cebolla quadrangle overlaps two physiographic provinces, the San Juan Basin and the Tusas Mountains. Westward-dipping Mesozoic rocks, Quaternary cinder cones and flow rock, and Quaternary gravel terraces occur in the Chama Basin of the San Juan
  • Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico

    Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico

    Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Roessel, Raymond J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 19:50:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191379 HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE CHINLE WASH WATERSHED, NAVAJO NATION, ARIZONA, UTAH AND NEW MEXICO by Raymond J. Roessel A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN HYDROLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1994 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
  • Geologic Map and Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon Area, Cottonwood Canyon Quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California

    Geologic Map and Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon Area, Cottonwood Canyon Quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California

    Geologic Map and Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon Area, Cottonwood Canyon Quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California By Paul Stone, Calvin H. Stevens, Paul Belasky, Isabel P. Montañez, Lauren G. Martin, Bruce R. Wardlaw, Charles A. Sandberg, Elmira Wan, Holly A. Olson, and Susan S. Priest Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3298 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover View of Marble Canyon area, California, showing dark rocks of Mississippian Indian Springs Formation and Pennsylvanian Bird Spring Formation overlying light rocks of Mississippian Santa Rosa Hills Limestone in middle distance. View is southeast toward Emigrant Wash and Tucki Mountain in distance. U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Stone, P., Stevens, C.H., Belasky, P., Montanez, I.P., Martin, L.G., Wardlaw, B.R., Sandberg, C.A., Wan, E., Olson, H.A., and Priest, S.S., 2014, Geologic map and upper Paleozoic stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon area, Cottonwood Canyon quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3298, scale 1:24,000, 59 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3298.
  • The Geology of New Mexico As Understood in 1912: an Essay for the Centennial of New Mexico Statehood Part 2 Barry S

    The Geology of New Mexico As Understood in 1912: an Essay for the Centennial of New Mexico Statehood Part 2 Barry S

    Celebrating New Mexico's Centennial The geology of New Mexico as understood in 1912: an essay for the centennial of New Mexico statehood Part 2 Barry S. Kues, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, [email protected] Introduction he first part of this contribution, presented in the February Here I first discuss contemporary ideas on two fundamental areas 2012 issue of New Mexico Geology, laid the groundwork for an of geologic thought—the accurate dating of rocks and the move- exploration of what geologists knew or surmised about the ment of continents through time—that were at the beginning of Tgeology of New Mexico as the territory transitioned into statehood paradigm shifts around 1912. Then I explore research trends and in 1912. Part 1 included an overview of the demographic, economic, the developing state of knowledge in stratigraphy and paleontol- social, cultural, and technological attributes of New Mexico and its ogy, two disciplines of geology that were essential in understand- people a century ago, and a discussion of important individuals, ing New Mexico’s rock record (some 84% of New Mexico’s surface institutions, and areas and methods of research—the geologic envi- area is covered by sediments or sedimentary rocks) and which were ronment, so to speak—that existed in the new state at that time. advancing rapidly through the first decade of the 20th century. The geologic time scale and age of rocks The geologic time scale familiar to geologists working in New The USGS did not adopt the Paleocene as the earliest epoch of the Mexico in 1912 was not greatly different from that used by modern Cenozoic until 1939.
  • 2013 NMGS Spring Meeting: Abstract-67

    2013 NMGS Spring Meeting: Abstract-67

    TOWARD STANDARDIZATION OF PHANEROZOIC STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE IN NEW MEXICO Steven M. Cather1, Kate E. Zeigler2, Greg H. Mack3 and Shari A. Kelley1 1New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Pl., Socorro, NM, 87801, [email protected] 2Department of Natural Resources Management, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM, 87701 3Department of Geological Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003 Recent decades have seen an unprecedented rate of change in the Phanerozoic stratigraphic nomenclature of New Mexico. At the same time, the state has experienced a dramatic resurgence of geologic quadrangle mapping, primarily facilitated by the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992, which enabled the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs. The utility of the new stratigraphic nomenclature has not yet been adequately tested, and in some cases has been opposed by other researchers. Despite a lack of consensus among stratigraphers, it is desirable to have an agreed-upon nomenclature for the purpose of ongoing geologic mapping. We present here, from our perspective as geologic mappers, revisions to the Phanerozoic stratigraphic nomenclature of New Mexico. We hope our discussion will eventually lead to adoption of a standardized nomenclature, for the purposes of mapping, by the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, which administers the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs in New Mexico. Here we criticize, and suggest alternatives to, aspects of recent nomenclatural