21St Forum on the Geolo F Industrial Minerals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wollastonite–A Versatile Industrial Mineral
Industrial Minerals of the United States Wollastonite–A Versatile Industrial Mineral What is Wollastonite? Wollastonite is a chemically simple mineral named in honor of English mineralogist and chemist Sir W.H. Wollaston (1766–1828). It is composed of calcium (Ca) and silicon and oxygen (SiO2, silica) with the chemical formula CaSiO3. Although much wollastonite is relatively pure CaSiO3, it can contain some iron, magnesium, (Above and right) Hand specimens of manganese, aluminum, potassium, wollastonite showing acicular crystal clusters. sodium, or strontium substituting for calcium in the mineral structure. Pure wollastonite is bright white; the geologic conditions during formation What Makes Wollastonite and host rock composition. The type and amount of impurities can Useful? produce gray, cream, brown, pale- Lewis Deposit, mined by NYCO green, or red colors. Minerals, Inc., in the Adirondack Wollastonite has several physical Mountains in Essex County, was properties that make it useful as an formed by the recrystallization of industrial mineral: Geology of U.S. Precambrian carbonate rocks inter- Wollastonite Deposits layered with high-grade metamor- ∑ Wollastonite is largely inert, phic rocks. Nearby reserves are although it will dissolve in concen- Wollastonite is formed by two contained in the Oak Hill and trated hydrochloric acid. It will not processes. The first occurs when Deerhead deposits. The ore bodies react with other components of silica and limestone are raised to a consist of the minerals wollastonite, manufactured products either during temperature of 400°–450°C, either garnet, and diopside with as much as or after the manufacturing process. because of deep burial (regional 60 percent of the bodies being ∑ During crushing, wollastonite metamorphism) or by being baked wollastonite. -
The American Journal of Science
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOIENOE. EDITOR: EDWARD S. DANA. ASSOCIATE EDITORS PROFESSORS GEO. L. GOODALE, JOHN TROWBRIDGE, H. P. BOWDITCH AND W. G. FARLOW, OF CAMBRIDGE, PROFESSORS O. C. MAHSH, A. E. VERRILL AND H. S. WILLIAMS, OF NEW HAVEN, PROFESSOR GEORGE F. BARKER, OF PHILADELPHIA, PROFESSOR H. A. ROWLAND, OF BALTIMORE, MR. J. S. DILLER, OF W ASHl~GTON. FOURTH SERIES. VOL. II-[WHOLE NUMBER, CLI!.] Nos. 7-12. JULY TO DEOEMBER, 1896. WITH SIX PLATES. NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT. 1896'. J. B. Pratt-Northupite, PirBsonite, etc. 123 , ART. ~V.-On Northupite; Pirs8onite, a new mineral j (}OI!flussite and IIanksite from Borax Lake, San Bernar dino County, Californi(t j by J. H. PRATT. INTRODUCTION. THE minerals to be described in this paper are from the remarkable locality of Borax Lake, San Bernardino County, California. They were broug-ht to the author's notice, in the fall of 1895, by Mr. Warren M. Foote of Philadelphia, who sent one of them, the northupite, tog-ether with some of the associ ated minerals, to the mineralogical laboratory of the Sheffield Scientific School, for chemical investigation. About the same time Mr. C. H. Northup of San Jose, CaL, sent some minerals from the same region to Prof. S. L. Penfield. Among them, gaylussite, hanksite and a third mineral, which has proved to be a new species, were identified. These same minerals were also observed among the specimens sent by Mr. Foote. Mr. Northup, in his letter of transmittal, stated that he had care fully saved all of the crystals of the new mineral, having observed that they were different from gaylnssite in habit, and that he believed they would prove to be a new and interesting species. -
Gaylussite Na2ca(CO3)2 • 5H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
Gaylussite Na2Ca(CO3)2 • 5H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. As flattened wedge-shaped crystals with dominant {110}, {011}, {001}, smaller {010}, {100}, {101}, {112}; also as prismatic to dipyramidal crystals elongated along [100], to 6 cm. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {110}, perfect; on {001}, imperfect. Fracture: Conchoidal. Tenacity: Very brittle. Hardness = 2.5–3 D(meas.) = 1.991 D(calc.) = 1.991 Dehydrates with efflorescence in dry air; slowly decomposes in H2O leaving CaCO3 as calcite or aragonite. Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Colorless to pale yellow or pale gray, white; colorless in transmitted light. Streak: White to pale gray. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Orientation: X = b; Z ∧ c = –15◦. Dispersion: r< v,strong, crossed. α = 1.444 β = 1.516 γ = 1.523 2V(meas.) = 34◦ Cell Data: Space Group: C2/c. a = 11.589 b = 7.780 c = 11.207 β = 102.5◦ Z=4 X-ray Powder Pattern: John Hay, Jr. Well No. 1, Wyoming, USA. 6.403 (100), 3.18 (80), 2.70 (80), 2.61 (80), 1.91 (80), 2.49 (70), 1.98 (70) Chemistry: (1) (2) CO2 30.02 29.72 SiO2 0.08 Fe2O3 0.03 MnO 0.01 MgO 0.01 CaO 19.02 18.94 Na2O 20.40 20.93 H2O 30.47 30.41 insol. 0.16 Total 100.20 100.00 • (1) Taboos-nor salt lake, Mongolia. (2) Na2Ca(CO3)2 5H2O. Occurrence: Typically in evaporites or shales from alkali lakes; rarely in veinlets cutting alkalic igneous rocks. -
Corporate Presentation
FSE: 6IM | OTCQB: IMAHF | TSX.V: IMA CORPORATE PRESENTATION September 7, 2017 www.imineralsinc.com 1 FSE:61M | OTCQB: IMAHF | TSX.V: IMA Forward Looking Statements This presentation may contain forward-looking statements which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of I-Minerals to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements may include statements regarding exploration results and budgets, resource estimates, work programs, strategic plans, market price of industrial minerals or other statements that are not statements of fact. Although I-Minerals believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Various factors that may affect future results include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in market prices of minerals, foreign currency exchange fluctuations, risks relating to exploration, including resource estimation and costs and timing of commercial production, requirements for additional financing, political and regulatory risks, and other risks described in I-Minerals’ management discussions and analyses as filed on SEDAR and EDGAR. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements 2 FSE:61M | OTCQB: IMAHF | TSX.V: IMA Permitted Deposit, Robust Feasibility Study, Strong Management • -
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science Part II Addresses and Invited Papers Vol. 98 (1988) Speaker OF THE Year 63 SPEAKER OF THE YEAR ADDRESS—1988-89 INDUSTRIAL MINERALS—A CRITICAL KEY TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Haydn H. Murray Speaker of the Year Department of Geology Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT: Industrial or non-metallic minerals are essen- tial to economic development. The value of industrial mineral production in the United States is over 3 times the value of metallic mineral production. In the developed countries of the world, the value of non-metallic mineral production exceeds the value of metallic mineral production. The development of a modern industrialized society requires quality and reason- ably priced industrial minerals in such industries as smelting of copper and iron, manufacturing cement, drilling oil wells, manufacturing ceramic materials, and a host of others. Be- cause transportation costs are high, most industrial minerals are not imported so a country or region must have a good raw material source. INTRODUCTION A precise inclusive definition for industrial minerals or non-metallic minerals is difficult because it includes many unrelated minerals that range from low priced materials such as sand and gravel to high priced materials like industrial dia- monds. The World Bank report (Noestaller, 1987) defines industrial minerals as comprising all non-metallic non-fuel minerals extracted and processed for industry end uses, some metallic minerals consumed in non-metallurgical applications, -
New Mineral Names*
American Mineralogist, Volume 75, pages 240-246, 1990 NEW MINERAL NAMES* JOHN L. JAMBOR CANMET, 555 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OGI, Canada EDWARD S. GREW Department of Geological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A. Baiyuneboite-(Ce) the formula for cordylite-(Ce) requires revision such that Pigqiu Fu, Xlanze Su (1987) Baiyuneboite-A new min- cordylite-(Ce) and baiyuneboite-(Ce) may be identical. The eral. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 7, 289-297 (in Chinese, Chairman therefore withdrew the approval and asked that English abstract). the authors withhold publication of their description of Pingqiu Fu, Youhua Kong, Guohong Gong, Meicheng baiyuneboite-(Ce) until the matter could be resolved. The Shao, Jinzi Qian (1987) The crystal structure of bai- request, unfortunately, was ignored. J.L.J. yuneboite-(Ce). Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 7, 298-304 (in Chinese, English abstract). Diaoyudaoite* Electron-microprobe analyses of ten grains, whose va- lidity was checked by single-crystal X-ray methods prior Shunxi Shen, Lirong Chen, Anchun Li, Tailu Dong, Qiu- to analysis, gave an average ofNa20 4.73, CaO 1.04, BaO huo Huang, Wenqiang Xu (1986) Diaoyudaoite-A new 20.38, Ce20, 24.21, La20, 10.92, Pr20, 0.62, Nd20, 10.04, mineral. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 6, 224-227 (in Gd20, 0.13, F 2.50, C02 (by gas chromatography) 24.64, Chinese, English abstract). o == F 1.05, sum 98.16 wt%, corresponding to Nal.OS- The average of 13 electron-microprobe analyses gave (BaO.94CaO.I,)n07( Ce I.OSLao.4sN do.42Pr 0.0'Gdo.OI)"1.99F 0.9'C,.97- Na20 4.54, AI20, 93.00, Cr20, 1.95, MgO 0.10, CaO 0.10, 012.07'ideally NaBaCe2F(CO')4' The mineral occurs as yel- SiOz 0.23, K20 0.12, sum 100.04 wt%, corresponding to low, irregular grains 0.3 to 3 mm in size, frequently as (N ao.87Ko.ozMgo.02CaO.01)ro.92(AllO.84CrO.lsSio.02)"'1.01 0,7, ide- thin hexagonal tablets. -
AP42 Section: Reference: Title: 11.25 Clays, S. H. Patterson and H. H
AP42 Section: 11.25 Reference: ~ Title: Clays, S. H. Patterson and H. H. Murray, Industrial Minerals And Rocks, Volume 1, Society Of Mining Engineers, New York, 1983. The term clay is somewhat ambiguous un- less specifically defined, because it is used in three ways: (I) as a diverse group of fine- grained minerals, (2) a5 a rock term, and (3) as a particle-size term. Actually, most persons using the term clay realize that it has several meanings, and in most instances they define it. As a rock term, clay is difficult to define be- cause of the wide variety of materials that com- ,me it; therefore, the definition must be gen- 'eral. Clay is a natural earthy, fine-grained ma- Iterial composed largely of a group of crystalline ;minerals known as the clay minerals. These minerals are hydrous silicates composed mainly of silica, alumina, and water. Several of these minerals also contain appreciable quantities of iron, alkalies, and alkaline earths. Many defini- tions state that a clay is plastic when wet. Most clay materials do have this property, but some clays are not plastic; for exaniple, halloysite and flint clay. As a particle-size term, clay is used for the category that includes the smallest particles. The maximum-size particles in the clay-size grade are defined differently on various grade scales. Soil imestigators and mineralogists gen- erally use 2 micrometers as the maximum size, whereas the widely used scale by Wentworth (1922) defines clay as material finer than ap proximately 4 micrometers. Some authorities find it convenient to'use the term clay'for any fine-grained, natural, earthy, argillaceous material (Grim. -
Trona Na3(CO3)(HCO3) • 2H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
Trona Na3(CO3)(HCO3) • 2H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. Crystals are dominated by {001}, {100}, flattened on {001} and elongated on [010], with minor {201}, {301}, {211}, {211}, {411},to 10 cm; may be fibrous or columnar massive, as rosettelike aggregates. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {100}, perfect; {211} and {001}, interrupted. Fracture: Uneven to subconchoidal. Hardness = 2.5–3 D(meas.) = 2.11 D(calc.) = 2.124 Soluble in H2O, alkaline taste; may fluoresce under SW UV. Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Colorless, gray, pale yellow, brown; colorless in transmitted light. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Orientation: X = b; Z ∧ c =83◦. Dispersion: r< v; strong. α = 1.412–1.417 β = 1.492–1.494 γ = 1.540–1.543 2V(meas.) = 76◦160 2V(calc.) = 74◦ Cell Data: Space Group: I2/a. a = 20.4218(9) b = 3.4913(1) c = 10.3326(6) β = 106.452(4)◦ Z=4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Sweetwater Co., Wyoming, USA. 2.647 (100), 3.071 (80), 4.892 (55), 9.77 (45), 2.444 (30), 2.254 (30), 2.029 (30) Chemistry: (1) (2) CO2 38.13 38.94 SO3 0.70 Na2O 41.00 41.13 Cl 0.19 H2O 20.07 19.93 insol. 0.02 −O=Cl2 0.04 Total 100.07 100.00 • (1) Owens Lake, California, USA; average of several analyses. (2) Na3(CO3)(HCO3) 2H2O. Occurrence: Deposited from saline lakes and along river banks as efflorescences in arid climates; rarely from fumarolic action. Association: Natron, thermonatrite, halite, glauberite, th´enardite,mirabilite, gypsum (alkali lakes); shortite, northupite, bradleyite, pirssonite (Green River Formation, Wyoming, USA). -
Stratigraphy, Age, and Rates of Deposition of the Datil Group (Upper
Stratigraphy,age, and rates of deposition ol the Datil Group (Upper Eocene-Lower0ligocene), west-central New Mexico bySteren M. Cather,Willian C. Mclntosh, and Charles E. Chapin,New Mexico Bureau of Minesand Mineral Resources, Socorro, NM 87801 Introduction Stratigraphyand contacts The Datil Group, formerly called the SpearsFormation, comprises The term Datil Formation was coined by Winchester(1920), but a seriesof volcaniclasticrocks, lava flows, and ash-flow tuffs that its usagehas since evolved considerably(see, for example,Elston, crops out in a broad, west-trending swath of discontinuous expo- 1976;Cather, 1986).In this report, we employ the nomenclatureof suresin west-centralNew Mexico.The Datil Group is the oldestunit Osburn and Chapin (1983),who restrict usage of the Datil Group in the_northern Mogollon-Datil volcanic field, and ranges in thick- to the volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks that occur belowHells Mesa ness from more than 1 km to about 300 m where it onlaps late Tuff. In addition, we divide the Datil Group into two informal units, Laramideuplifts. This report summarizespart of a doctoral disser- the lower Datil and the upper Datil (Fig. 2). tation on the Datil Group (Cathea 1986)and incorporates15 new The lower Datil is dominatedby andesiticvolcaniclastic rocks that {rdiometric datesby Mclntosh et al. (1986),Mclntosh (in progress), are characterizedby phenocrystic plagioclase,amphibole, and ti- C. E. Chapin (unpublished),and Cather (1986).To facilitatediscus- tanomagnetite(+ biotite). Silicacontent in Datil andesitestypically sion of various Datil Group exposureswithin the study area, we rangesfrom 58 Io 64 wt. percent.Throughout most of the northern have divided the outcrop belt into geographicsegments'(Fig 1). -
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent. -
Industrial Minerals-Mines, Quarries, and General Resources in Kansas 2008
Industrial Minerals-Mines, Quarries, and General Resources in Kansas 2008 Lawrence L. Brady Kansas Geological Survey 1930 Constant Avenue Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Telephone (785) 864-2159 Fax (785) 864-5317 E-mail lbrady@ kgs.k u.edu Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016-24 ABSTRACT Industrial mineral production in Kansas based on tonnage mainly involves those commodities that are important to the construction industry. Among those commodities with large tonnage are sand and gravel and stone—both crushed and dimension, mainly limestone but also with a limited amount of sandstone. Sand and gravel are obtained primarily from pits in western Kansas and from pits and dredging in rivers and floodplains in the central and eastern part of the state. Crushed stone for aggregates and for use in cement production is mainly from limestone units of Pennsylvanian age in eastern Kansas, and the dimension stone is now cut from Lower Permian limestone units. Outstanding buildings in the past were also constructed from limestone rocks from Middle and Upper Pennsylvanian and Upper Cretaceous limestone units. Clay and shale from Pennsylvanian and Cretaceous units are used for manufacture of structural clay products, brick, and lightweight aggregate and in Portland and masonry cement manufacture. Salt is a major industrial mineral important to the state. It is produced from the thick Hutchinson Salt Member in the Lower Permian Wellington Formation that is present in the subsurface in a large part of central Kansas. The salt is mined by room-and-pillar methods at three locations, and salt is also produced by solution mining from four different brine fields. -
U.S. Mining Industry Energy Bandwidth Study
Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................5 2. Background ..................................................................................................................7 2.1 Mining Industry Energy Sources ...................................................................................7 2.2 Materials Mined and Recovery Ratio ............................................................................7 2.3 Mining Methods.............................................................................................................8 3. Mining Equipment.......................................................................................................9 3.1 Extraction.....................................................................................................................10 3.2 Materials Handling Equipment....................................................................................11 3.3 Beneficiation & Processing Equipment.......................................................................12 4. Bandwidth Calculation Methodology ......................................................................13 4.1 Method for Determining Current Mining Energy Consumption .................................14 4.2 Best Practice, Practical Minimum, and Theoretical Minimum Energy Consumption 16 4.3 Factoring