DOCSLIB.ORG

Fort Pulaski National Monument Administrative History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fort Pulaski National Monument Administrative History fopu_front Crop Marks are Black National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Pulaski National Monument Savannah, Georgia Fort Pulaski National Monument Administrative History Cultural Resources Southeast Region Fort Pulaski National Monument Administrative History December 2003 J. Faith Meader New South Associates Cameron Binkley, Editor National Park Service The administrative history presented here exists in two formats. A printed version is available for study at the park, the Southeastern Regional Office of the National Park Service, and at a variety of other repositories. For more widespread access, this administrative history also exists in a web-based format through ParkNet, the website of the National Park Service. Please visit www.nps.gov for more information. Cultural Resources Division Southeast Regional Office National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303 404-562-3117 Fort Pulaski National Monument P.O. Box 30757 Highway 80 East Savannah, Georgia 31410-0757 About the cover: A “park” guide poses in front of the Fort Pulaski National Monument contact station, which was located in Savannah, Georgia, at the intersection of Bull Street and Victory Boulevard in the 1930s. The contact station was necessary because Fort Pulaski, located on an island in the Savannah River, was difficult to access during the early years of its development. Lack of uniform insignia suggests that the guide, identity unknown, was a CCC employee. Source: Fort Pulaski NM photo collection. iv Fort Pulaski National Monument Administrative History Contents Figures . ix Tables . x Figure Credits . x Foreword . xi Introduction Chapter One: The History of Fort Pulaski Early History of Cockspur Island . 3 The Construction of Fort Pulaski . 5 The Civil War Years . 8 Chapter Two: Fort Pulaski Prior to the National Park Service The Military Post after the Civil War, 1865-1880 . 13 Fort Pulaski Military Reservation, 1881-1914 . 13 The American Antiquities Act and the Establishment of the National Park Service. 16 Designation of Fort Pulaski as a National Monument, 1915-1933. 18 Chapter Three: Development of Fort Pulaski National Monument Land Acquisition at Fort Pulaski NM . 23 New Deal Agencies and Programs at Fort Pulaski NM, 1933-1941 . 23 Civil Works Administration (CWA). 24 Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) . 24 Public Works Administration (PWA) . 28 Mission 66 at Fort Pulaski NM, 1956-1966 . 29 Visitor Center Construction . 30 Other Mission 66 Projects. 31 Additional Park Development, 1966-2000. 32 Chapter Four: Interpretation and Visitor Services Early Park Interpretation and Visitation, 1934-1938. 35 Fort Museum, 1939-1956 . 37 Casemate Exhibits and Fort Tours . 37 Collections Transfer to Ocmulgee National Monument, 1942-1947 . 38 Post-World War II Years . 38 Commemorative Markers and Interpretive Signs and Aids . 38 Mission 66 Interpretation, 1956-1966 . 39 Interpretive Prospectus, 1971 . 40 Living History and Reenactments. 41 Interpretation, Collections, and Visitor Services in the 1980s and 1990s . 42 Visitation Statistics and Trends. 44 National Park Service v Special Events . .45 Chapter Five: Park Planning Master Plans . .49 Master Plans, 1939 and 1942. .49 Master Plan, 1965 . .52 Master Plan, 1971 . .52 Land Protection Plan, 1984 . .53 Park Planning, 1993-2001 . .55 Chapter Six: Park Administration Government Agencies at Fort Pulaski NM . .57 Naval Occupation of Cockspur Island, 1942-1948 . .57 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers . .59 U.S. Coast Guard . .61 Transfer of Cockspur Island Lighthouse from U.S. Coast Guard . .62 Savannah Bar Pilots . .64 Cooperative Activities . .65 Chatham County . .65 Volunteers . .66 Youth Conservation Corps . .66 Management Issues . .67 Chapter Seven: Resource Management and Law Enforcement Cultural Resource Management . .69 Archeological Investigations. .69 Collections Management . .71 Artifact Preservation . .73 National Register Nomination . .74 Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) . .75 Cockspur Island Lighthouse Restoration . .76 Natural Resource Management . .78 Moat Management . .78 Shoreline Stabilization . .80 Water Studies. .82 Flora and Fauna . .82 Law Enforcement . .84 Safety Measures . .86 Conclusion Appendix A: Chronology - Fort Pulaski National Monument . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Structure Report: Battery Horace Hambright, Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Pulaski National Monument Georgia Battery Horace Hambright Historic Structure Report Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Battery Horace Hambright Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia Historic Structure Report February 2019 Prepared by: Panamerican Consultants, Inc. 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, New York 14227 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 330 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, Illinois 60062 Prepared for: National Park Service Southeast Regional Office 100 Alabama Street SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Cultural Resources, Partnership and Science Division Southeast Region National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404) 562-3117 About the front cover: View of Battery Horace Hambright from HABS GA-2158. This manuscript has been authored by Panamerican Consultants, Inc., and Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., under Contract Number P16PD1918 with the National Park Service. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. Battery Horace Hambright Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia Historic Structure Report Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2006 HNSA Anchor Watch.Qxd 1/20/2010 6:25 PM Page 1
    Winter 2010 AW:Winter 2006 HNSA Anchor Watch.qxd 1/20/2010 6:25 PM Page 1 JANUARY NCHOR FEBRUARY A MARCH APRIL WATCH 2010 The Quarterly Journal of the Historic Naval Ships Association www.hnsa.org CSS NEUSE: IRONCLAD SLATED TO GET A NEW HOME Winter 2010 AW:Winter 2006 HNSA Anchor Watch.qxd 1/20/2010 6:25 PM Page 2 2 ANCHOR WATCH HNSA STAFF HNSA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS President Executive Director RADM John P. McLaughlin, USS Midway CDR Jeffrey S. Nilsson, USN (Ret) Vice President Executive Director Emeritus Brad King, HMS Belfast CAPT Channing M. Zucker, USN (Ret) Secretary Executive Secretary LCDR Sherry Richardson, HMCS Sackville James W. Cheevers Treasurer Individual Member Program Manager COL Patrick J. Cunningham CDR Jeffrey S. Nilsson, U.S.N. (Ret) Buffalo & Erie County Naval & Military Park Anchor Watch Editor Immediate Past President Jason W. Hall William N. Tunnell, Jr., USS Alabama/USS Drum Battleship New Jersey Museum Webmaster HONORARY DIRECTORS Richard S. Pekelney Admiral Thad W. Allen, U.S. Coast Guard Sean Connaughton, MARAD International Coordinator Admiral Michael G. Mullen, U.S. Navy Brad King Larry Ostola, Parks Canada HMS Belfast Vice Admiral Drew Robertson, Royal Canadian Navy Admiral Sir Alan West, GCB DCD, Royal Navy DIRECTORS AT LARGE HNSA COMMITTEE Captain Terry Bragg CHAIRPERSONS USS North Carolina Captain Jack Casey, USN (Ret) USS Massachusetts Memorial Annual Conference Maury Drummond Ms. Angela McCleaf USS KIDD USS Texas Awards Alyce N. Guthrie PT Boats, Inc. James W. Cheevers United States Naval Academy Museum Terry Miller Communications Tin Can Sailors, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Jasper Ocean Terminal Project Update
    December 2020 December 2020 Environmental Impact Statement Project Update Introduction The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement to assess the potential impacts associated with the construction and operation of a new marine container terminal on the Savannah River by the Jasper Ocean Terminal Joint Venture, a partnership between the Georgia Ports Authority IN THIS ISSUE and the South Carolina Ports Authority. The JOT marine container terminal would be constructed on an approximately 1,500-acre site (an existing Dredged Material Containment Area) on the north bank of the Savannah River in Jasper County, South Carolina across the Savannah River from Elba Island in Chatham County, Georgia. Introduction ..................................1 The JOT would be a state-of-the-art marine container terminal to transfer containerized JOT Project Map .......................... 2 cargo between container ships, over-the-road trucks, and intermodal rail cars. The proposed JOT is required for the GPA and the SCPA to meet the current forecasted demand for additional containerized cargo for the Port of Savannah and the Port of Work Accomplished to Date Charleston through the Design Year 2055. for EIS ............................................ 3 Elements of the proposed JOT project would include: What’s New with JOT? ............... 3 Terminal Site Road & Rail Access Corridor Current Related Activities in • 12,500-foot long pile supported wharf • 4-lane divided highway to connect and a 210-foot wide
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Artillery Defenses Department of the Gulf 11 January 1864
    Confederate Artillery Defenses Department of the Gulf 11 January 1864 Fort Morgan 5 ­ 10" Columbaids 3 ­ 10" Sea Coast Mortars 1 ­ 8" Columbaid 2 ­ 8" Blakley Rifles 2 ­ 6.4" Rifles (old 32pdrs, rifled and banded) 5 ­ 6.4" Rifles (old 32pdrs, rifled, not banded) 16 ­ 32pdr Smoothbores 1 ­ 5.82" Rifle (8" Columbaid Pattern) 2 ­ 5.82" Rifles (old 24pdrs, not banded) 4 ­ 24pdr Smoothbores 20 ­ 24pdr Flank Casemate Howitzers 1 ­ 12pdr Field Howitzer 1 ­ 3" Rifle Fort Gaines 3 ­ 10" Columbaids 2 ­ 8" Siege Mortars 7 ­ 6.4" Rifles (old 32pdrs, rifled and banded) 5 ­ 32pdr Smoothbores 2 ­ 24pdr Smoothbores 11 ­ 24pdr Flank Casemate Howitzers 2 ­ 18pdr Guns 1 ­ 12pdr Field Howitzer Fort Powell 2 ­ 8" Columbaids 1 ­ 6.4" Rifle (l0" Columbaid Pattern) 2 ­ 24pdr Smoothbores 3 ­ 12pdr Field Howitzers 2 ­ 6pdr Field Guns Battery McIntosh 6 ­ 10" Columbaids 1 ­ 6.4" Rifle (old 32pdrs, rifled and banded) Battery Gladden 4 ­ 10" Columbaids 1 ­ 7" Brooke Rifle Battery Missouri 3 ­ 10" Columbaids 1 ­ 7" Rifle (old 42pdrs, rifled and banded) Battery Tracy 1 ­ 8" Columbaid 1 ­ 8" Sea Coast Howitzer 2 ­ 7" Rifles, (old 42pdrs, rifled and banded) 1 ­ 32pdr Smoothbore Battery Huger 2 ­ 10" Columbaids 2 ­ 42pdr Smoothbores 1 ­ 24pdr Smoothbore Redoubt No. 1 3 ­ 12pdr Siege and Field Guns Redoubt No. 2 not reported Redoubt No. 3 3 ­ 24pdr Smoothbores Redoubt No. 4 3 ­ 24pdr Smoothbores Redoubt No. 5 1 ­ 24pdr Smoothbore Redoubt No. 6 3 ­ 6.4" Rifles (old 32pdrs, rifled and banded) Redoubt No. 7 1 ­ 8" Columbaid 1 ­ 6.4" Rifle (old 32pdr, rifled and banded) Redoubt No.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight and Intermodal Transportation
    C H A P T E R 5 FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION FREIGHT AND INTERMOD AL TRANSPORTATION A region’s industry and employment characteristics play a large role in the freight composition. Glynn County is largely a service-driven economy. The private sector employs about 76 percent of residents, with manufacturing employing approximately six percent and services employing about 65 percent of Glynn County residents. Federal, state and local government employs about 24 percent of County residents1. As such, the County primarily consumes goods rather than produces them. Existing Freight Conditions In order to create a freight movement profile for Glynn County the Federal Highway Administration Freight Analysis Framework data was compiled to develop an approximate estimate of freight movements. A total of about 816,000 tons were inbound in 2012 valued at approximately $3.0 billion (primarily motorized vehicles from eastern Asia to Los Angeles and nonmetallic minerals from Europe to the Philadelphia, PA area), while outbound totaled approximately 954,000 tons valued at $2.3 billion (primarily motorized vehicles and newsprint/paper to Europe). There were approximately 142 million tons moving regional with an approximate value of over $63 billion. Trucks carried 95 percent of the total 141.9 million tons of freight flowing through the area, while rail carried five percent of the share. Water and intermodal modes carry less than one percent each. The dominance of truck is due to the mode’s flexibility in terms of being able to handle varying shipment sizes and ability to achieve door-to-door delivery virtually anywhere without making any additional mode transfers.
    [Show full text]
  • CSS Georgia 2007 New South Assoc Rpt.Pdf
    I J K L New South Assciates • 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue • Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 CSS Georgia: Archival Study CONTRACT NO. DACW21-99-D-0004 DELIVERY ORDER 0029 Report submitted to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889 Report submitted by: New South Associates 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 _____________________________________ Mary Beth Reed - Principal Investigator Authors: Mark Swanson, New South Associates – Historian and Robert Holcombe, National Civil War Naval Museum – Historian New South Associates Technical Report 1092 January 31, 2007 CSS GEORGIA iii ARCHIVAL STUDY Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part One: Historical Context 3 The Setting: Geography of the Savannah Area 3 Pre-War Economic Developments, 1810-1860 5 Changes in Warfare, 1810-1860 6 Initial Development of Confederate Navy, 1861 – March 1862 8 Confederate Navy Reorganization, 1862-1863 17 Josiah Tattnall and the Beginnings of the Savannah Squadron, Early 1861 20 War Comes to Savannah, November 1861 – April 1862 23 Impetus for Georgia: The Ladies Gunboat Association 28 Construction of Georgia, March – October 1862 32 The Placement of Georgia, Late 1862 34 The Savannah Station and Squadron, 1862-1864 36 Fall of Savannah, December 1864 39 Part Two: CSS Georgia - Research Themes 41 Planning and Construction 41 1. Individuals and Organizations Involved in Fund-Raising 41 2. Evidence for Conception of Construction Plans for the Vessel; Background and Skill of Those Involved and an Estimate of How Long They Worked on the Project 45 3. Evidence for the Location of the Construction Site, the Site Where the Engine and Machinery Were Installed, and a Description of These Facilities 48 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Amend the Senate Transportation Committe
    08 AM 34 0254 ADOPTED Senator Mullis of the 53rd offered the following amendment: 1 Amend the Senate Transportation Committee substitute to HR 468 by inserting between lines 2 7 and 8 of page 12 the following: 3 WHEREAS, Christmas Moultrie was born a slave on Mulberry Grove Plantation on 4 Christmas Day, 1863; and 5 WHEREAS, Christmas Moultrie was the last child born into slavery on Mulberry Grove 6 Plantation; and 7 WHEREAS, Christmas Moultrie lived most of his life on the Plantation as a renowned 8 Savannah River market hunter; and 9 WHEREAS, Christmas Moultrie´s expertise as a market hunter is documented in a book 10 entitled Ward Allen, Savannah River Market Hunter by John Eugene Cay, Jr., copyright 11 1958; and 12 WHEREAS, Mulberry Grove Plantation was where President George Washington stayed 13 during his only visits to Georgia in the 1790´s as the guest of Catherine Greene, the widow 14 of the Revolutionary War hero, General Nathaniel Greene; and 15 WHEREAS, Christmas Moultrie´s grave is located outside Port Wentworth, Georgia, in 16 historic Cherokee Hill Cemetery; and 17 WHEREAS, it is only fitting that the life of Christmas Moultrie be memorialized by 18 dedicating an interchange in his honor. 19 PART XIX 20 WHEREAS, portions of U.S. Highways 129, 78, and 278 and State Routes 47, 77, and 22 21 pass through historically significant regions of this state, especially with regard to Georgians 22 who were leaders in the American Civil War; and 23 WHEREAS, recognizing and promoting the historical significance of this region could 24 promote economic development through tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Port of Jacksonville to Lower Your Cost to Market
    ® MAKING THE CASE FOR Using the Port of Jacksonville to Lower Your Cost to Market Situated within a day’s drive of 70+ million consumers, America’s logistics center is a place where shippers of all sizes and across all industries come to lower their cost to market and grow their enterprises. PEERLESS CONTENT CREATION JACKSONVILLE PORT AUTHORITY MAKING THE CASE USING THE PORT OF JACKSONVILLE TO LOWER YOUR COST TO MARKET It’s a Fact: Jacksonville is the Logistics Center of America RIVE INTO JACKSONVILLE, FLA., and you’ll probably notice a roadside sign that Dstates, “America’s Logistics Center.” Aptly named, this Florida city is positioned at the nation’s center when it comes to moving shipments from Point A to Point B. “This isn’t just propaganda; it’s a fact,” says Scott Lane, CIO at Jacksonville-based Beaver Street Fisheries, a wholesaler of seafood and meat that sells to mass discounters, grocers, distributors, food service companies, and restaurant chains. “Look at where Jacksonville is on the map, and we’re sitting here between two Class I railroads, three major highway systems, and a port that carries over 1.3 million TEUs of cargo annually.” Peel back JAXPORT’s layers a little further and you’ll find a robust logistics infrastructure that spans all modes of transportation, ocean carriers of all sizes, and third-party logistics (3PL) companies. “When you factor in the many 3PLs that are based here in Jacksonville,” says Lane, “our logistics footprint is clearly expansive.” Wanted: The Right Logistics Hub Many factors are taking a toll on shippers’ bottom lines: international tariffs, global competition, rising freight rates, fluctuating transportation capacity, and the need to fulfill customers’ orders at lightning speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Final General Management Plan, Wilderness Study, and Environmental Impact Statement June 2013
    Fort Pulaski National Monument National Park Service Georgia U.S. Department of the Interior Final General Management Plan, Wilderness Study, and Environmental Impact Statement June 2013 Front cover photo credits, clockwise from top left:National Park Service; Tammy Herrell; David Libman; David Libman General Management Plan / Wilderness Study / Environmental Impact Statement Fort Pulaski National Monument Chatham County, Georgia SUMMARY President Calvin Coolidge established Fort Lighthouse and the other is known as Pulaski as a national monument by Daymark Island. Finally, in 1996, Congress proclamation on October 15, 1924, under the passed a law that removed the U.S. Army authority of section 2 of the Antiquities Act Corps of Engineers’ reserved right to deposit of 1906. The proclamation declared the dredge spoil on Cockspur Island. entire 20-acre area “comprising the site of the old fortifications which are clearly This General Management Plan / Wilderness defined by ditches and embankments” to be Study / Environmental Impact Statement a national monument. provides comprehensive guidance for perpetuating natural systems, preserving By act of Congress on June 26, 1936 (49 Stat. cultural resources, and providing 1979), the boundaries of Fort Pulaski opportunities for high-quality visitor National Monument were expanded to experiences at Fort Pulaski National include all lands on Cockspur Island, Monument. The purpose of the plan is to Georgia, then or formerly under the decide how the National Park Service can jurisdiction of the secretary of war. The best fulfill the monument’s purpose, legislation also authorized the Secretary of maintain its significance, and protect its the Interior to accept donated lands, resources unimpaired for the enjoyment of easements, and improvements on McQueens present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Ports Authority
    gaports.com Gateway To The World Gateway To The World Index American businesses, shipping products to A deepened harbor is important because the “The Port of Savannah plays a key role in delivering on that promise.” — Target 4 destinations across the globe, have chosen the Port of shipping industry is moving to larger vessels. Savannah as a critical gateway in their supply chains. In 2016, the Panama Canal will complete its expansion. In the following pages, industry leaders will detail The new locks will send ships to Savannah that are as “With partners such as the Georgia Ports Authority… we are able to flow product to the size and scope of their operations, and how their much as three times the capacity of ships currently and from the facility… and get to our end customer efficiently.” — Home Depot 6 businesses and the nation’s economic wellbeing would able to transit the Canal. be jeopardized — if not for Savannah’s continued Major manufacturers and retailers look to the “Working directly with Caterpillar, the GPA considers the entire transportation reliable, efficient and cost-effective operation. harbor deepening as an important opportunity to — Caterpillar and logistics chain… to best serve our needs.” 8 Today, the Port of Savannah reaches 44 percent become more competitive at home and abroad. of the American population — roughly 140 million U.S. Army Corps of Engineers studies show that Super people — within a two-day drive. Post-Panamax vessels more efficiently served by “Deepening the Savannah Harbor will allow us to keep our markets that we have It serves as the cargo hub for a region covering a deeper Savannah harbor will lower shipping costs and go out and get others.” — Bell Farms 10 the entire U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Priest Recalls Masses He Said at Aunt's Elba Island Home
    Thursday, August 18, 2005 FEATURE Southern Cross, Page 3 Priest recalls Masses he said at aunt’s Elba Island Home he late Monsignor Thomas J. Brennan had photos taken when he ven- Ttured to Elba Island in the summer of 1924 to say Mass. The young priest recorded the date on the back of one of the photographs: June 20, 1924. Brennan also recorded dates of the second and third Masses he cele- brated at the lighthouse keeper’s home on the island on June 21 and July 3. Father Brennan’s Henry Martus, 53, retains his rank, memories of being listed as “ordinance sergeant”, these Masses while his son, George, 19 years, is said early in his identified as “assistant light keeper”. long and fruitful Martus’ wife, Rosanna, 52, is keep- career revealed ing house and daughters Rosanna J., the regard he felt 21; Mary, 14, and Florence, 12, for his Uncle “reside in the home.” Rita H. DeLorme George, keeper The demographics of the Martus of the Elba household changed considerably in Island light, and his Aunt, Flo- the decade following the 1880 cen- rence—George’s sister—who spent sus. By 1890, John Martus had died, courtesy of the Diocesan Archives. Photo most of her life on the lonely is- and the two older Martus daughters Father Thomas J. Brennan prepares for Mass on Elba Island in 1924. land. Brennan would go on to labor had married. Only the widowed those who sailed the seas came to and in turn each vessel, from the successfully in the missions of Rosanna Martus, son George, and expect her salute.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration
    National Park Service U.S Department of the Interior Washington Support Office: Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Interpretation, Education and Volunteers Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration Summary Report DEDICATION This report honors all those who suffered and died in this nation’s struggles for freedom and equality. It is also dedicated to our colleague, Tim Sinclair, who was taken from us too soon. Timothy D. Sinclair, Sr. (1974-2016) Chief of Interpretation Selma to Montgomery NHT Tuskegee Airmen NHS and Tuskegee Institute NHS You took us on a walk from Selma to Montgomery. To keep your vision and memory alive, “We’re still marching!” Silent sentinels stood watch for 22 hours to commemorate the 22 hours of combat that took place at Spotsylvania’s Bloody Angle. FREDERICKSBURG AND SPOTSYLVANIA NMP Cover Graphic: Courtesy of Chris Barr FOREWORD The Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration has been quite a journey. Thanks to all of you who helped make it a meaningful and memorable one for our country. We hope our efforts have helped Americans understand the connection between these two epic periods of time as a continuous march toward freedom and equality for all–a march that continues still today. Along the way, perhaps the National Park Service learned something about itself, as well. When we first began planning for this commemorative journey, there were several Civil War parks that had difficultly acknowledging slavery as the cause of the war. Both Civil War sites and civil rights sites questioned whether a combined “Civil War to Civil Rights” Commemoration would water down and weaken each.
    [Show full text]