DOCSLIB.ORG

Problem Vlasništva U Rusoovoj I Marksovoj Filozofiji Doktorska Disertacija

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Problem Vlasništva U Rusoovoj I Marksovoj Filozofiji Doktorska Disertacija UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET ODSEK ZA FILOZOFIJU PROBLEM VLASNIŠTVA U RUSOOVOJ I MARKSOVOJ FILOZOFIJI DOKTORSKA DISERTACIJA Mentor: Kandidatkinja: Prof. dr Milenko A. Perović Maja Solar Novi Sad, 2014. g. UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET KLJUČNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA INFORMACIJA Redni broj: RBR Identifikacioni broj: IBR Tip dokumentacije: Monografska dokumentacija TD Tip zapisa: Tekstualni štampani materijal TZ Vrsta rada (dipl., mag., dokt.): Doktorska disertacija VR Ime i prezime autora: Maja Solar AU Mentor (titula, ime, prezime, zvanje): Prof. dr Milenko A. Perović, redovni profesor, MN Odsek za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu Naslov rada: Problem vlasništva u Rusoovoj i Marksovoj filozofiji NR Jezik publikacije: srpski / latinica JP Jezik izvoda: srpski / engleski JI Zemlja publikovanja: R Srbija ZP Uže geografsko područje: Vojvodina UGP Godina: 2014 GO Izdavač: autorski reprint IZ 2 Mesto i adresa: Novi Sad, dr Zorana Đinđića 2 MA Fizički opis rada: (4 poglavlja / 229 stranica / 84 referenci ) FO Naučna oblast: Filozofija NO Naučna disciplina: Filozofija ekonomije ND Predmetna odrednica, ključne reči: Filozofija ekonomije, filozofija politike, istorija PO kapitalizma, apsolutizam, Ruso, Marks, kritika vlasništva, privatno vlasništvo, kolektivno vlasništvo, individualizam, luksuz, jednakost, otuđenje, način proizvodnje, prvobitna akumulacija UDK Čuva se: Biblioteka Odseka za filozofiju, Filozofski ČU fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Važna napomena: VN Izvod: str. 7 IZ Datum prihvatanja teme od strane NN 11. 04. 2014. veća: DP Datum odbrane: DO Članovi komisije: predsednik: doc. dr Jasna Šakota Mimica (ime i prezime / titula / zvanje / naziv član-mentor: prof. dr Milenko A. Perović organizacije / status) član: doc. dr Dejan Donev KO 3 UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY KEY WORD DOCUMENTATION Accession number: ANO Identification number: INO Document type: Monograph documentation DT Type of record: Textual printed material TR Contents code: PhD Thesis CC Author: Maja Solar AU Mentor: Milenko A. Perović, Full Professor MN Department of Philosopy, Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad Title: The Problem of the Property in Rousseau’s and TI Marx’s Philosophy Language of text: Serbian (Latin) LT Language of abstract: Serbian/English LA Country of publication: Serbia CP Locality of publication: Vojvodina LP Publication year: 2014 PY 4 Publisher: Author's reprint PU Publication place: Novi Sad, dr Zoran Đinđić 2 PP Physical description: ( 4 chapters / 229 pages / 84 references) PD Scientific field Philosophy SF Scientific discipline Philosophy of Economy SD Subject, Key words Philosophy of Economy, Political Philosophy, SKW History of Capitalism, Absolutism, Rousseau, Marx, The Critique of Property, Private property, Common Property, Individualism, Luxury, Equality, Alienation, Mode of Production, Primitive Accumulation UC Holding data: HD Note: N Abstract: p. 8 AB Accepted on Scientific Board on: 11. 04. 2014. AS Defended: DE Thesis Defend Board: president: doc. dr Jasna Šakota Mimica DB member: prof. dr Milenko A. Perović member: doc. dr Dejan Donev 5 Sadržaj: • REZIME ................................................................................................................................. 7 • ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 8 • UVOD ................................................................................................................................... 9 - FILOZOFSKE REFLEKSIJE O VLASNIŠTVU ................................................................. 9 - RUSOOVA I MARKSOVA KRITIKA VLASNIŠTVA ...................................................... 20 • AGRARNI KAPITALIZAM I NOVI REŽIM VLASNIŠTVA ....................................... 28 - MOR O VLASNIŠTVU ....................................................................................................... 32 - HOBS O VLASNIŠTVU ...................................................................................................... 33 - LOK O VLASNIŠTVU ........................................................................................................ 36 • APSOLUTISTIČKA MONARHIJA I REŽIM VLASNIŠTVA .................................... 39 - RUSO O VLASNIŠTVU ...................................................................................................... 51 - OSUDA LUKSUZA I ISTICANJA TROŠENJA (LA DÉPENSE OSTENTATOIRE) .......... 79 - VLASNIŠTVO I INDIVIDUA ............................................................................................ 107 - VLASNIŠTVO I JEDNAKOST .......................................................................................... 124 • INDUSTRIJSKI KAPITALIZAM I REŽIM VLASNIŠTVA ....................................... 142 - MARKSOVA KONCEPCIJA OTUĐENJA ........................................................................151 - VLASNIŠTVO I NAČIN PROIZVODNJE ........................................................................ 166 - PRVOBITNA AKUMULACIJA KAPITALA .................................................................... 190 - FORME PRIVATNOG I KOLEKTIVNOG VLASNIŠTVA ............................................ 212 • LITERATURA .................................................................................................................... 221 6 REZIME: Rusoove i Marksove refleksije o vlasništvu nisu jednoznačne, mnogostruki su problemi koje filozofsko mišljenje ovog pojma otvara. Usredsređenje ovog teksta je na konceptualizaciji vlasništva u konjunkciji sa problemima individualizma, idejom jednakosti, problematizacijom luksuza, analizom načina proizvodnje, fenomenom otuđenja i diferenciranjem različitih formi privatnog i kolektivnog vlasništva. Rad je nastojao da pokaže bitna mesta presecanja i približavanja Rusoovih i Marksovih promišljanja problema vlasništva, ali i njihova udaljavanja. Analiza je kao strukturalni okvir za promišljanje problema vlasništva postavila istorijsko razlikovanje agrarno-kapitalističkog, apsolutističkog i industrijsko-kapitalističkog horizonta, spram kojih je moguće pokazati zašto su se i Rusoova i Marksova tematizacija vlasništva pojavile kao radikalno kritičke. Ipak, Rusoova konceptualizacija vlasništva se provodi iz ravni kritike nejednakosti, što čini i njeno ograničenje s obzirom na povezivanje ideje jednakosti sa staleškim sistemom dominacije i potčinjavanja, dok se Marksova analiza problema vlasništva provodi iz ravni kritike političke ekonomije, čime je omogućena klasna analiza i radikalna kritika postojećeg klasnog društvenog raslojavanja. KLJUČNE REČI: Filozofija ekonomije, istorija kapitalizma, apsolutizam, Ruso, Marks, kritika vlasništva, privatno vlasništvo, kolektivno vlasništvo, individualizam, luksuz, jednakost, otuđenje, način proizvodnje, prvobitna akumulacija. 7 ABSTRACT: Rousseau’s and Marx’s reflections on the property are not unequivocal, there are manifold problems to which the philosophical thinking of property gives rise. The focus of this text is based upon conceptualization of the property in conjunction with the problems of individualism, idea of equality, problematization of the luxury, analysis of the modes of production, phenomenon of alienation and with the differentiation of various forms of private and collective property. The study attempted to demonstrate crucial spots of intersection and convergence of Rousseau’s and Marx’s reflections of the problem of the property, but also their divergence. The analysis set a structural framework for the reflection of the problem of property in historical differentiation of agrarian capitalism, absolutism and industrial capitalism, toward which is possible to show why Rousseau’s and Marx’s thematisation of the property is radical and critical. However, Rousseau’s conceptualisation is carried out from the level of critique of inequality, which makes its limitations regarding to the connection of equality with the estate system of domination and submission, while Marx's analysis of the problem of the property is carried out from the level of the critique of political economy, which enabled the class analysis and radical critique of the existing class and social stratification. KEY-WORDS: Philosophy of Economy, History of Capitalism, Absolutism, Rousseau, Marx, The Critique of Property, Private property, Common Property, Individualism, Luxury, Equality, Alienation, Mode of Production, Primitive Accumulation. 8 UVOD FILOZOFSKE REFLEKSIJE O VLASNIŠTVU Problem i pojam vlasništva (eng. property, franc. propriété, nem. Eigentum) usidrava se u različita teorijska polja, od istorijskog, preko pravnog, političkog i ekonomskog, do sociološkog i filozofskog. Ova polja se u analizama i tematizaciji vlasništva ukrštaju, stoga usredsređenje na problem vlasništva zahteva obuhvatno interdisciplinarno istraživanje i promišljanje ovog pojma u njegovim složenim određenjima. Dakako, određenja pojma vlasništva nisu fiksirana, značenjska mapa ideje vlasništva se menja od teorije do teorije, te od različitog istorijskog konteksta koji suodređuje propitivanje vlasništva. No, postavlja se pitanje da li je problem vlasništva filozofski problem i, ako jeste, u kom smislu govorimo o filozofskoj tematizaciji pojma vlasništva? Odgovor na ovo pitanje već nam je dala istorija filozofije. Problematizacija vlasništva pojavljuje se kao jedno od krucijalnih diskusionih polja u istoriji filozofije, a u sprezi sa različitim tematskim ravnima koje je legitimiraju i kao par excellence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Centar Za Ženske Studije Zagreb Jednosemestralni
    CENTAR ZA ŽENSKE STUDIJE ZAGREB JEDNOSEMESTRALNI ŽENSKOSTUDIJSKI OBRAZOVNI PROGRAM 2020. Uvod u feminističku epistemologiju, Žene i socijalna država terminologiju i ženske studije Danijela Dolenec Josipa Lulić Toni Prug Biljana Kašić Petra Rodik Nina Čolović Suzana Kunac Maja Solar Nivedita Majumdar Socioekonomski kontekst suvremenih feminističkih borbi Analitički fokusi feminističkih struja i pravaca Mislav Žitko Ankica Čakardić Jelena Ostojić Biljana Kašić Ana Vilenica Mario Kikaš Karolina Leaković Mia Gonan Toni Prug Lilijana Burcar Nina Čolović Lezbijski studiji Tihana Pupovac Sanja Juras Roberta Nikšić Leonida Kovač Lepa Mlađenović Historija feminizma – lokalno i regionalno u Jelena Miloš globalnom kontekstu Sandra Prlenda Queer studiji Renata Jambrešić Kirin Lina Gonan Chiara Bonfiglioli Natalija Iva Stepanović Maja Solar Nina Čolović Tihana Pupovac Dušan Maljković Reprodukcija, tijelo i režimi patrijarhata Feministička optika kulturno-umjetničkih Lilijana Burcar praksi Ana Vilenica Lea Horvat Jasmina Husanović Josipa Lulić Mia Gonan Sanja Iveković Marta Baradić Sanja Horvatinčić Luka Matić Nikolina Pristaš Vesna Vuković Feministička kritika nasilja Leonida Kovač Valentina Andrašek Katja Praznik Maja Solar Marijana Senjak Feministička kritika nacionalne države i Ivana Radačić kapitalizma Bojana Ivanišević Mario Kikaš Miloš Urošević Maja Gergorić Ivan Tranfić Goran Pavlić Luka Matić Uvod u feminističku epistemologiju, terminologiju i ženske studije Feministički kolektiv: teorija u praksi (radionica) Josipa Lulić Sažetak Ideja superžene koja je osnažena dovoljno da joj ne treba nitko poruka je internalizirane kapitalističke ideologije. Dapače, radi se o kamenu temeljcu na kojemu sustav počiva. U tom je pak slučaju gradnja kolektiva kamen temeljac otpora. Pitanje organizacije i uloge kolektiva javlja se i u raspravama oko političkog organiziranja u feminističkim krugovima, gdje se ponekad javlja rascjep teorije i prakse: naime, puno je lakše govoriti o kolektivu u teoriji nego raditi na praksama koje bi omogućile da kolektiv zaista funkcionira.
    [Show full text]
  • The Housing Policies in Socialist Yugoslavia 287
    2 Analize • For our comrade Ivan Radenković Publisher: Center CZKD - Center for Cultural Decontamination Birčaninova 21, Belgrade For the publisher: Borka Pavićević Editors: Vida Knežević, Marko Miletić Technical editor: Anica Stojanović Introduction: Vida Knežević and Marko Miletić Analyses: Domagoj Mihaljević, Artan Sadiku, Mario Reljanović, Borovo Group (Sven Cvek, Snježana Ivčić, Jasna Račić), Lidija K. Radojević and Ana Podvršič, Boris Postnikov, Iskra Krstić, Ivan Radenković and Maja Solar, Ivana Vaseva, Isidora Ilić and Boško Prostran (Doplgenger), Rade Pantić, Ines Tanović and Boriša Mraović (Crvena), Tanja Vukša and Vladimir Simović Research and art works: Borovo Group (Sven Cvek, Snježana Ivčić, Jasna Račić), Mario Reljanović, Srđan Kovačević, The Workers’ Video Club – Zrenjanin, Lidija Radojević and Ana Podvršič, Boris Postnikov, Vigan Nimani, Iskra Krstić, Irena Pejić, Milivoje Krivokapić (Culture Center Punkt), Milica Lupšor, Bojan Mrđenović, Filip Jovanovski, Contemporary Art Center of Montenegro (Nađa Baković), Doplgenger, Crvena, Majlinda Hoxha, Miloš Miletić and Mirjana Radovanović (KURS) Translation and proofreading: Novica Petrović, Andrew Hodges, Jelena Mandić, Elizabeta Bakovska, Iskra Krstić Design and layout: Andreja Mirić This publication is illustrated with details from exhibition visualizations by KURS (Miloš Miletić and Mirjana Radovanović) Printed by: Standard 2, Belgrade Print run: 600 We Have Built Cities for You On the contradictions of Yugoslav socialism Belgrade, 2018 6 Introduction: 11 ..... Vida Knežević and Marko Miletić, We Have Built Cities for You: On the Contradictions of Yugoslav Socialism Analyses: 29 ..... Domagoj Mihaljević, In search for the lost future 47 ..... Artan Sadiku, From the Core to the Periphery: On the Aesthetic Form of Workers 61 ..... Mario Reljanović, The normative position of trade unions and the ideals of selfmanagement 81 ....
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-01-02.Indd
    Originalni naučni rad UDK 316.66-055.2(497.1)"1918/1939" Ana Rajković* Croatian Institute of History Department for the History of Slavonia, Srijem and Baranja THE POSITION OF FEMALE WORKERS IN YUGOSLAVIA BETWEEN THE TWO WORLD WARS A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 1918 1939 Abstract: The position of female workers from the middle of the 19th century, when they took a more active role in the world of work, was marked with double oppression, both gender- and class-conditioned. After World War I there was a strong conviction that legal framework would be changed and that it would enable women to have an equal social and political status. Although this did not happen, women still participat- ed in the public domain. They were particularly active in the working sphere, which provided them with a more active social role, especially when it came to numerous strikes which were primarily a response to economic circumstances or demands for collective agreements and better working conditions. Within this context, the aim of the paper is to analyse the position of female workers in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, placing special emphasis on their social status and strikes as a means of gender and class emancipation. This analysis is conducted within the frameworks of microhistory and comparative history in order to create a thesis that women’s labour movement, influenced by communist ideas, was an important component of the Yugo- slav labour movement in the interwar years, and that it had an impact on the formation and strengthening of the class and gender awareness in Yugoslav female workers.
    [Show full text]
  • TRADICIJA NASTAVE Finalno Sa Praznim.Indd
    ýasopis Arhe Edicija filozofske literature Propaideia IzdavDþ Odsek za filozofiju Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad Urednik Milenko A. PerRYLü Recenzenti Prof. dr Radomir VidenoYLü Prof. dr Branko Balj Lektura i korektura Milena StefaQRYLü Prelom i korice Vladimir VaWLü Štampa Sajnos, Novi Sad Tiraž 200 Ova knjiga nastala je kao rezultat rada na nauþno-istaživDþkom projektu „Nastava filozofije u srpskim gimnazijama Vojvodine u meÿXratnom periodu“, koji finansira Ministarstvo prosvete i nauke. Broj Projekta: 179007. ISBN 978-86-6065-301-9 CIP- Katalogizacija u publikaciji Biblioteka Matice srpske, Novi Sad 37.916::1(497.113)(091)(082) TRADICIJA NASTAVE FILOZOFIJE VIII / [Urednik Milenko A. PerovLü]. – Novi Sad : Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju, 2014 (Novi Sad : Sajnos). – 156 str. ; 24 cm. – (Edicija filozofske literature Propaideia / ýasopis Arhe) Tiraž 200. – Beleška o autorima: str. 153. – Napomene i bibliografske reference uz tekst. - Bibliografija uz svaki rad. – Rezimei ne engl. jeziku uz svaki rad. ISBN 978-86-6065-301-9 a) Ɏɢɥɨɡɨɮɢʁɚ – ɇɚɫɬɚɜɚ - ɂɫɬɨɪɢʁɚ - ȼɨʁɜɨɞɢɧɚ - Ɂɛɨɪɧɢɰɢ COBISS.SR-ID 236463111 Odlukom Nastavno-nauþnog veüa Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu od 12.12.2008. godine data je saglasnost za štampanje knjiga u okviru ove Edicije. TRADICIJA NASTAVE FILOZOFIJE VIII NOVI SAD, 2014. SADRŽAJ Predgovor [7] * Nastava filozofije i kulturna politika Dragan Prole [9] Analiza zastupljenosti filozofskih predmeta i tema u „Izveštajima” KarlovaþNH gimnazije. Period od 1917-1941. godine Željko KaluÿerovLü [31] Didaktika u svetlu filozofije kontrasta. Prikaz didaNWLþNog kriticizma Miloša R. MiloševLüD Damir SmiljanLü [55] Metodika nastave filozofije u srednjim školama Kraljevine Jugoslavije Una PopovLü [77] KrLWLþko mišljenje kao filozofski vaspitni cilj Marica RajkovLü Mina ĈikanovLü Nevena JevWLü [93] „Sistematko-didaNWLþNL uvod u filozofiju“ Stjepana Cimermana Nikola TatalovLü [109] Zagorka 0LüLü o kulturnoj politici Maja Solar [123] Kultura panhumanizma.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Class Politics
    FEMINIST CLASS POLITICS - EXCHANGING THEORY AND PRACTICE Challenges of the New Feminist Movements The year 2017 began with a global wave of feminist protests. In the US, the Women’s Marches brought hundreds of thousands to the streets, while the #MeToo debate raised public awareness of sexual harassment and violence. In Poland, resistance to restrictions on reproductive rights continued, while the 8 March demonstrations filled the streets from Berlin to Buenos Aires, and from Istanbul to New Delhi. In Spain, a feminist general strike mobilized around five million women. These protests are successful transnational social movements of our times, visibly counteracting right-wing populism and authoritarianism. At the same time, right-wing parties and movements are successfully increasing in size, mobilizing against the achievements of the women’s and LGBTIQ movements. They portray «gender mania» and «marriage for all» as elitist issues and as threats to allegedly «natural» gender roles and ways of life. On the one hand they build on existing racist and sexist attitudes, intensifying them. On the other hand they are successfully articulating a widespread discontent rooted in the organic crises of neoliberalism: discontent with growing social inequalities, with the hollowing out of democratic structures and procedures, and with a continual market pressure that makes it impossible for most people to reconcile wage labour, reproductive rights and other basic needs. The right is not offering real solutions to these problems, but it is taking them up and re-articulating them, while presenting themselves as the voice of the «common people». This constellation has brought new attention to the practices and approaches of connective and organizing politics across the broader left.
    [Show full text]
  • WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR from REALITY from Political Education Towards Self-Organisation
    WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR FROM REALITY From Political Education WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR FROM REALITY towards Self-Organisation IMPRESSUM Publication: When documents are far from reality. From political education towards self- organisation Publisher: Roma Forum of Serbia, Belgrade Editor: Maja Solar Authors: Radovan Jovanović, Danilo Ćurčić, Milena Reljić, Jelena Reljić, Jelena Krivokapić, Jasmina Drmaku, Žarka Svirčev, Robert Kasumović and Maja Solar Translation: Jelena Mandić Proofreading: Maja Solar Design and layout: KURS This publication has been produced with the support of the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Office for Southeast Europe as a part of the political education project of Roma Forum of Serbia for 2019 and 2020. The publication, or parts of it, can be freely used if the source is cited. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Roma Forum of Serbia or the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Office for Southeast Europe. Roma Forum of Serbia, 2020 WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR FROM REALITY From Political Education towards Self-Organisation CONTENTS 9 Introduction 15 Radovan Jovanović - WHEN THE RIGHT TO WATER IS NOT ENOUGH 25 Danilo Ćurčić - HOUSING PROBLEMS OF THE ROMA IN SERBIA 35 Milena and Jelena Reljić - POSITION OF THE YOUNG ROMA IN SERBIA 41 Jelena Krivokapić - MEDIA CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS CRIMINALISATION OF THE ROMA 47 Jasmina Drmaku - DOES THE ECONOMY HAVE AN IMPACT ON ROMA CULTURE AND TRADITION? 55 Žarka Svirčev - A DOLL FOR A ROMA GIRL 63 Robert Kasumović - LACK OF POLITICAL UNITY OF THE ROMA IN SERBIA 69 Maja Solar - SOCIAL INCLUSION AS DEPOLITICIZATION OF THE ROMA COMMUNITY 87 Biographies of the authors Introduction For many years, Roma Forum of Serbia has been one of the rare Roma organisations working on the political education of the Roma commu- nity.
    [Show full text]
  • WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR from REALITY from Political Education Towards Self-Organisation
    WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR FROM REALITY From Political Education WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR FROM REALITY towards Self-Organisation IMPRESSUM Publication: When documents are far from reality. From political education towards self- organisation Publisher: Roma Forum of Serbia, Belgrade Editor: Maja Solar Authors: Radovan Jovanović, Danilo Ćurčić, Milena Reljić, Jelena Reljić, Jelena Krivokapić, Jasmina Drmaku, Žarka Svirčev, Robert Kasumović and Maja Solar Translation: Jelena Mandić Proofreading: Maja Solar Design and layout: KURS This publication has been produced with the support of the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Office for Southeast Europe as a part of the political education project of Roma Forum of Serbia for 2019 and 2020. The publication, or parts of it, can be freely used if the source is cited. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Roma Forum of Serbia or the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Office for Southeast Europe. Roma Forum of Serbia, 2020 WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE FAR FROM REALITY From Political Education towards Self-Organisation CONTENTS 9 Introduction 15 Radovan Jovanović - WHEN THE RIGHT TO WATER IS NOT ENOUGH 25 Danilo Ćurčić - HOUSING PROBLEMS OF THE ROMA IN SERBIA 35 Milena and Jelena Reljić - POSITION OF THE YOUNG ROMA IN SERBIA 41 Jelena Krivokapić - MEDIA CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS CRIMINALISATION OF THE ROMA 47 Jasmina Drmaku - DOES THE ECONOMY HAVE AN IMPACT ON ROMA CULTURE AND TRADITION? 55 Žarka Svirčev - A DOLL FOR A ROMA GIRL 63 Robert Kasumović - LACK OF POLITICAL UNITY OF THE ROMA IN SERBIA 69 Maja Solar - SOCIAL INCLUSION AS DEPOLITICIZATION OF THE ROMA COMMUNITY 87 Biographies of the authors Introduction For many years, Roma Forum of Serbia has been one of the rare Roma organisations working on the political education of the Roma commu- nity.
    [Show full text]
  • Disrupting Historicity, Reclaiming the Future
    This volume is the result of the close collaboration between the University of Naples ”L’Orientale” and the scholars organizing and Università degli studi di Napoli participating in the postgraduate course Feminisms in a Transnational Perspective in Dubrovnik, Croatia. The contributions presented here “L’Orientale” use different conceptual approaches to theory, history and cultural texts, and to women’s lives, experiences and legacies, in order to offer their re-visions of the past and their prospects of the future as an act of feminist responsibility. Disrupting Historicity, Reclaiming the Future Disrupting Historicity, Reclaiming the Future is a complex, methodologically innovative, and valuable collection of scholarly works. Pointing to mimetic and absent places (themes, artefacts, female figures, suppressed Others, acts of resistance) within great historical narratives and the importance of a different kind of reading and researching of heritage, archived sociality, and the future, the essays collected here signal the potency of feminist epistemology to assume responsibility in the ‘re-semantization of the contemporaneity’. The texts show how, with which tools, and through which critical lenses, feminist epistemology gives answers to the overwhelming problems of modernity, having in mind the centrality of emancipatory values of women’s heritage and insight. (Prof. Biljana Kašić, University of Zadar, Croatia) The collected book of proceedings Disrupting Historicity, Reclaiming the Future represents a valuable publication that includes multiple perspectives, problems and concepts of feminist research (...) from a wide range of approaches: from analyzing historical materials, archives, new discoveries to an overview of the lives and works of female Disrupting Historicity, Reclaiming the Future philosophers, the predecessors of gender studies, literary and film criticism, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradicija Nastave Filozofije 6
    Časopis Arhe Edicija filozofske literature Propaideia Izdavač Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad Odsek za filozofiju Za izdavača Ivana Živančević-Sekeruš Urednik Milenko A. Perović Recenzenti Prof. dr Radomir Videnović Prof. dr Branko Balj Lektura i korektura Milena Stefanović Prelom teksta i štampa Štamparija Feljton Stražilovska 17 21000 Novi Sad Tiraž 200 Ova knjiga nastala je kao rezultat rada na naučno-istaživačkom projektu „Nastava filozofije u srpskim gimnazijama Vojvodine u međuratnom periodu“, koji finansira Ministarstvo prosvete i nauke. Broj Projekta: 179007. ISBN 978-86-6065-150-3 CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији Библиотека Матице српске, Нови Сад 371 . 3 : : 1 ( 497 . 113 ) ( 091 ) ( 082 ) TRADICIJA nastave filozofije. 6 / [urednik Milenko A. Perović] . - Novi Sad : Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju, 2012 (Novi Sad : Feljton) . - 160 str. ; 24 cm. - ( Edicija filozofske literature Propaideia / Časopis Arhe ) Tiraž 200. - Beleška o autorima: str. 159. -Napomene i bibliografske reference uz tekst. - Bibliografija uz svaki rad. - Rezimei na engl. jeziku uz svaki rad. ISBN 978-86-6065-150-3 а) Филозофија - Настава - Историја - Војводина - Зборници COBISS.SR-ID 276616711 Odlukom Nastavno-naučnog veća Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu od 12.12.2008. godine data je saglasnost za štampanje knjiga u okviru ove Edicije. TRADICIJA NASTAVE FILOZOFIJE VI NOVI SAD, 2012. 4 SADRŽAJ Predgovor [7] Cimermanova filozofska propedeutika Milenko A. Perović [9] Autonomnost Karlovačke gimnazije u kreiranju nastave filozofije u periodu od 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • Sastavila Gordana Đilas
    BIBLIOGRAFIJA POLJA ZA 2010. 1. AĆIMOVIĆ, Mileta Ivkov 10. ALEMPIJEVIĆ, Milen Dva lica priče / Mileta Aćimović Ivkov. – Prikaz Točak, nebo, zemlja. I gitara / Milen Alempijević. knjige: Dejan Stojiljković: „Konstantinovo ra- U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 462 skršće”, Beograd, 2009. (mart-april 2010), str. 220-231. U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 461 11. ANČIĆ, Dejan (januar-februar 2010), str. 202-203. Inteligencija koja ne poznaje granice / Dejan 2. Lepota i groza / Mileta Aćimović Ivkov. – Prikaz Ančić. – O Mišelu Fukou. knjige: Stevan Tontić: „Sveto i prokleto”, Novi U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 463 Sad, 2009. (maj-jun 2010), str. 42-43. U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 462 12. ARMANO, Venero (mart-april 2010), str. 187-189. Usnuli neznanac / Venero Armano ; s engle- 3. Poezija i vreme / Mileta Aćimović Ivkov. – Pri- skog prevela Bojana Vujin. kaz knjige: Gojko Božović: „Mesta koja volimo”, U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 466 Beograd, 2009. (novembar-decembar 2010), str.73-80. U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 465 13. BAGIĆ, Krešimir (septembar-oktobar 2010), str. 205-208. Nezaustavljiva misao / Krešimir Bagić. 4. Priča i stvarnost / Mileta Aćimović Ivkov. – Prikaz U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 465 knjige: David Albahari, „Ćerka”, Beograd, 2009. (septembar-oktobar 2010), str. 35-39. U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578. – God. 55, br. 463 14. BARANEJ, Inez (maj-jun 2010), str. 204-206. Drugarica za izlaske / Inez Baranej ; s engleskog prevela Viktorija Krombholc. 5. Trajanje i priča / Mileta Aćimović Ivkov. – Prikaz U: Polja. – ISSN 0032-3578.
    [Show full text]
  • Centar Za Ženske Studije Zagreb Jednosemestralni
    CENTAR ZA ŽENSKE STUDIJE ZAGREB JEDNOSEMESTRALNI ŽENSKOSTUDIJSKI OBRAZOVNI PROGRAM 2019. Uvod u feminističku epistemologiju, Žene i socijalna država terminologiju i ženske studije Toni Prug Biljana Kašić Danijela Dolenec Iva Grgić Maroević Lea Horvat Branka Šegvić Maja Solar Socioekonomski kontekst Lilijana Burcar suvremenih feminističkih borbi Analitički fokusi i konceptualna Mislav Žitko ograničenja feminističkih Ana Vilenica struja i pravaca Karolina Leaković Lilijana Burcar Lezbijski studiji Vlasta Jalušić Silva Mežnarić Sanja Juras Miloš Urošević Jelena Miloš Mario Kikaš Olga Dimitrijević Ankica Čakardić Roberta Nikšić Queer studiji Cinzia Arruzza Slaven Crnić Historija feminizma – lokalno i Dušan Maljković regionalno u globalnom kontekstu Cinzia Arruzza Lina Gonan Ida Ograjšek Gorenjak Renata Jambrešić Kirin Feministička optika Chiara Bonfiglioli kulturno-umjetničkih praksi Sandra Prlenda Maja Solar Nikolina Pristaš Vesna Vuković Reprodukcija, tijelo i Natalija Iva Stepanović režimi patrijarhata Katja Praznik Ana Vilenica Feminizam između Marta Baradić nacionalne države i kapitalizma Mia Gonan Sara R. Farris Feministička kritika nasilja Jasmina Husanović Marina Gržinić Valentina Andrašek Šefik Tatlić Ivana Radačić Luka Matić Maja Mamula Tihana Pupovac Tithi Bhattacharya Uvod u feminističku epistemologiju, terminologiju i ženske studije Ženski studiji i feministička učionica Iva Grgić Maroević i Biljana Kašić Sažetak Namjera je ovoga predavanja pokazati smisao ženskostudijskog obrazovanja iz dvostrukog očišta: povijesno-preglednog
    [Show full text]
  • Strukturalizam I Marksizam 185
    ČASOPIS ZA TEORIJSKE PRAKSE GERUSIJA NOVI SAD, BR. 5/2013 JOURNAL FOR THEORETICAL PRACTICES GERUSIA NOVI SAD, No. 5/2013 STVAR - THING Časopis za teorijske prakse / Journal for theoretical practices Izdavač/Publisher Gerusija Novi Sad [email protected] http:gerusija.com Uredništvo/Editorship Aleksandar Matković, Aleksandar Stojanović, Andrea Jovanović, Đorđe Hristov, Ivan Radenković, Maja Solar, Mark Lošonc i LekturaSaša i Hrnjez korektura Ilustracije/IllustrationsGERUSIJA NemanjaPrelom/Layout Bogdanov IvanŠtampa/Print Radenković Tiraž/PrintFutura run 1100 Projekat i publikaciju je podržala Fondacija Rosa Luxemburg PREDGOVOR UVOD U RADIKALNE TEORIJE ANKICA• Ženski problemČAKARDIĆ u političkoj ekonomiji – od jugoslavenskog samoupravljanja do mjera štednji_16 MISLAV ŽITKO • Novac i kredit u marksističkoj teoriji_34 ALPAR LOŠONC • Kako je Marksa sustiglo vreme?_44 PRIMOŽ KRAŠOVEC • Nematerijalni rad u operaizmu i postoperaizmu_57 ALEKSANDAR STOJANOVIĆ • Altiser u svojim granicama_72 ĐORĐE HRISTOV • Altiser, subjekt i radnička klasa_92 SAŠA• “Staro HRNJEZ umire a novo ne može da se rodi”: Gramši na putu rađanja novoga_101 VUK VUKOVIĆ • Lenjin i politička intervencija – smemo li da pobedimo?_117 MAJA SOLAR • Brecht, politika umetnosti i teorije_133 MARK• Odbijanje LOŠONC rada – od pohvale lenjosti do strukturalne kritike_152 IGOR CVEJIĆ • Privatno, javno i zajedničko_165 ALEKSANDAR MATKOVIĆ • Crvena genealogija ili beg od tržišta?_173 LEONARDO KOVAČEVIĆ • Sociologova tjeskoba ili o politici znanja_181 IVAN RADENKOVIĆ • Strukturalizam i
    [Show full text]