DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Wenatchee National Forest, Naches Area, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Wenatchee National Forest, Naches Area, Washington United States In cooperation with Department of United States Department of Agriculture Agriculture, Forest Service; Soil Survey of Washington State Department of Natural Wenatchee Resources; and Washington State University, Agricultural Natural Research Center National Forest, Resources Conservation Service Naches Area, Washington, Parts of Kittitas and Yakima Counties How To Use This Soil Survey Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. i National Cooperative Soil Survey This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Forest Service, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, and Washington State University, Agricultural Research Center. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1996. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2003. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1996. The most current official data are available on the Internet. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover Caption Naches Ranger District of Wenatchee National Forest. Lost Lake in foreground, and Divide Ridge in background. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. ii Contents How to Use This Soil Survey ......................................................................................i Contents...................................................................................................................... iii Foreword ..................................................................................................................... ix General Nature of the Survey Area..............................................................................2 History and Development ........................................................................................2 Physiography, Relief, and Drainage ........................................................................3 Geologic History ......................................................................................................3 Climate .....................................................................................................................6 Table 1.—Temperature and Precipitation ............................................................ 7 Table 2.—Freeze Dates in Spring and Fall ......................................................... 8 Table 3.—Growing Season .................................................................................8 How This Survey Was Made ........................................................................................ 9 Detailed Soil Map Units ............................................................................................11 Table 4.—Acreage and Proportionate Extent of the Soils ..................................... 12 1—Ainsley gravelly ashy sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes .............................. 17 2—Ainsley gravelly ashy sandy loam, 30 to 55 percent slopes ............................ 18 3—Alfic Vitrixerands, 20 to 60 percent slopes** .................................................... 19 4—Andic Haplocryods, 10 to 30 percent slopes** ................................................. 20 5—Andic Haplocryods, 20 to 60 percent slopes** ................................................. 21 6—Andic Haplocryods-Rock outcrop-Chutes complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes** ...........................................................................................................22 7—Aquic Haploxererts, 0 to 3 percent slopes ....................................................... 23 8—Aquic Vitricryands-Cryaquands complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes** ................... 24 9—Badland, 5 to 30 percent slopes** ...................................................................26 10—Bearrun ashy sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes ...................................... 26 11—Bearrun ashy sandy loam, cold, 30 to 55 percent slopes .............................. 27 12—Bearrun-Aquic Haploxererts complex, cold, 0 to 30 percent slopes .............. 28 13—Bearrun-Bograp complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes ......................................... 30 14—Bertolotti gravelly ashy loamy sand, 30 to 55 percent slopes........................ 31 15—Bocker-Gidwin complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes............................................ 32 16—Bocker-Gidwin-McDanielake complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes ..................... 34 17—Bocker-Naxing complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes ........................................... 36 18—Bocker-Stemilt complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes ............................................ 38 19—Bograp ashy fine sandy loam, 10 to 35 percent slopes ................................. 39 20—Bograp-McDanielake complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes ............................... 40 21—Bograp-Singh complex, 30 to 55 percent slopes ........................................... 42 22—Haplocryolls, 0 to 3 percent slopes ................................................................ 44 23—Cryosaprists-Cryaquands complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes** ......................... 45 24—Darland very gravelly ashy fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes............. 46 25—Darland very gravelly ashy fine sandy loam, 30 to 70 percent slopes ........... 47 26—Darland-Naxing complex, 15 to 55 percent slopes ........................................ 48 27—Fifesridge-Pileup-Fiscus complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes .......................... 50 28—Fiscus ashy sandy loam, 25 to 55 percent slopes ......................................... 52 29—Fiscus ashy sandy loam, 55 to 70 percent slopes ......................................... 53 iii Soil Survey of Wenatchee National Forest, Naches Area, Washington 30—Fiscus-Pileup-Fifesridge complex, 30 to 55 percent slopes .......................... 54 31—Ghormley-Bearrun complex, 30 to 55 percent slopes ................................... 56 32—Ghormley-Bearrun-Aquic Haploxererts complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes ...... 58 33—Gilpar ashy sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes ............................................ 60 34—Gilpar ashy sandy loam, 30 to 55 percent slopes .......................................... 61 35—Gilpar-Haywire complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes ........................................... 62 36—Gilpar-Walupt complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes ........................................... 64 37—Icksix gravelly ashy sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes ............................... 65 38—Icksix gravelly ashy sandy loam, 30 to 55 percent slopes ............................. 66 39—Icksix gravelly ashy sandy loam, 55 to 80 percent slopes ............................. 67 41—Icksix gravelly ashy sandy loam, 20 to 80 percent slopes** .......................... 68 42—Icksix-Rock outcrop-Rubble land complex, 20 to 90 percent slopes** .......... 69 43—Jumpe stony ashy loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes............................................ 71 44—Jumpe stony ashy loam, 25 to 45 percent south slopes................................ 72 45—Jumpe stony ashy loam, 25 to 45 percent north slopes ................................ 73 46—Jumpe stony ashy loam, 45 to 65 percent north slopes ................................ 74 47—Kaner gravelly ashy sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes .............................. 75 48—Kaner
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit
    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit 353 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 11 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 11. Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit The Yakima River CHU supports adfluvial, fluvial, and resident life history forms of bull trout. This CHU includes the mainstem Yakima River and tributaries from its confluence with the Columbia River upstream from the mouth of the Columbia River upstream to its headwaters at the crest of the Cascade Range. The Yakima River CHU is located on the eastern slopes of the Cascade Range in south-central Washington and encompasses the entire Yakima River basin located between the Klickitat and Wenatchee Basins. The Yakima River basin is one of the largest basins in the state of Washington; it drains southeast into the Columbia River near the town of Richland, Washington. The basin occupies most of Yakima and Kittitas Counties, about half of Benton County, and a small portion of Klickitat County. This CHU does not contain any subunits because it supports one core area. A total of 1,177.2 km (731.5 mi) of stream habitat and 6,285.2 ha (15,531.0 ac) of lake and reservoir surface area in this CHU are proposed as critical habitat. One of the largest populations of bull trout (South Fork Tieton River population) in central Washington is located above the Tieton Dam and supports the core area.
    [Show full text]
  • CCC-Docent-Manual.Pdf
    DOCENT MANUAL Cowiche Canyon Snow Mountain Ranch Photos by David Hagen INDEX CCC DOCENT PROGRAM Definition of a Docent 2 Tasks of Docents 2 What CCC will provide to Docents 3 What Docents will provide 3 Qualities of a Docent 4 THE COWICHE CANYON CONSERVANCY Mission 5 Who We Are 5 What CCC Does 5 Rules for Use of CCC Properties 5 Areas Managed by CCC 6 CULTURAL HISTORY Cowiche Canyon 7 Cowiche Canyon, the Organization 8 Snow Mountain Ranch 9 The Gilbert Family 9 William O. Douglas 10 William O. Douglas Trail 10 Native American Connections 11 Euro-Americans and Agriculture 12 NATURAL HISTORY Geology 13 Shrub-Steppe 14 Native Plants and Wildflowers 17 Trees 20 Birds 22 Reptiles and Amphibians 25 Mammals 26 Fish 27 Butterflies 28 Conservation and Restoration 30 1 CCC DOCENT PROGRAM Welcome to Cowiche Canyon Conservancy’s Docent Program. A docent for Cowiche Canyon Conservancy is a volunteer who represents the Conservancy by communicating our mission to the general public. Docents will participate in various forms of outreach, both on and off Conservancy property with the aim of sharing our mission of conservation and nature education, and promoting the recreational use of CCC properties. The only requirements to be a docent are: be at least 18 years old, be a CCC member, be in adequate physical condition, and make a commitment of 15 to 20 volunteer hours per year. Docents are able to participate within their area of interest. A docent is not expected to be an expert. Docent training and the docent manual will provide basic information that will enable volunteers to answer questions about the organization as well as the natural and social history of Conservancy properties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yodelyodel
    TheThe YodelYodel Volume 14, Issue 1 Jan 2007 Keep climbing mountains and don’t slip! In This Issue: Glacier Climbing Course Begins The Autobiographi- What’s it all about? cal Jim Hinkhouse by Louisa Peck —pg. 2 I signed up for the Glacier Climbing Course with Grand Canyon Trek OSAT for one reason and one reason only: I wanted —pg. 3 to climb Mt. Rainier before I got too old. Or, to be even more honest, I wanted to be able to say I’d Sahale Peak Trip climbed Mount Rainier, which meant I probably —pg. 4 ought to actually do it, which meant joining OSAT Climbing Safety because it was cheap enough, and in turn jumping —p. 7 through this silly hoop they had called the Glacier Climbing Course, so I could get on with it. I didn’t Thoughts on plan on learning anything. I knew plenty; after all Sobriety —p. 7 I’d been hiking in the Cascades and Olympics since I was a kid, so what’s to learn? Josh R. hangs out in a crevasse on Baker, GCC 2006 Reflections on OSAT —p. 9 In retrospect, my attitude bears a striking resem- Just as I am excited to continue my life as a sober blance to that I brought into my first AA meeting. I woman and discover what new situations and de- Return to Goat wanted to learn how to control and enjoy my drink- mands I’ll have to rise to, so am I excited to continue Rocks ing, plus maybe cut down a little on how often I climbing mountains and discover more of what’s out —p.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Creek Dam Fish Passage Assessment First Annual Progress Report
    Clear Creek Dam Fish Passage Assessment First Annual Progress Report U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mid-Columbia Fishery Resource Office Yakima Sub-Office U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Columbia-Cascades Area Office April 10, 2013 Authors: Jeff A. Thomas (USFWS) Patrick Monk (USFWS) and Arden Thomas (USBR) Foreword The Clear Creek Dam Fish Passage Assessment is a cooperative investigation being conducted by staff from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Mid-Columbia Fishery Resource Office (Yakima Sub-Office), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Columbia-Cascades Area Office, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Region 3). Planning for this study began in early 2012 and the assessment will continue through 2015. This is the first of three annual progress reports which will be prepared during the course of this study. A final report will be submitted during the first half of 2016. Background The local population of bull trout which spawns in the North Fork Tieton River was not officially recognized until 2004 when biologists observed juvenile fish (obtaining genetic samples from some) and documented spawning activity for the first time during a comprehensive fish census (USFWS 2005). This census occurred above Clear Lake, a relatively small (4,400 acre-feet) impoundment formed when Clear Creek Dam was constructed on the North Fork Tieton River (hereafter North Fork) in 1914. Clear Creek Dam is located slightly less than one kilometer above Rimrock Lake, a much larger (198,000 acre-feet) reservoir impounded by Tieton Dam in 1925. Both of these dams were constructed by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1653-A Pamphlet
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1653-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE GOAT ROCKS WILDERNESS AND ADJACENT ROADLESS AREAS, LEWIS AND YAKIMA COUNTIES, WASHINGTON By S. E. Church, D. A. Swanson, D. L. Williams, G. A. Clayton, U.S. Geological Survey and T. J. Close, and T. J. Peters, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are currently being- studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Goat Rocks Wilderness and adjacent roadless areas in the Gifford Pinchot and Snoqualmie National Forests, Lewis and Yakima Counties, Wash. The Goat Rocks Wilderness (NF032) was established by Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964. The Goat Rocks Roadless Areas (06036 A, C, D) were classified as proposed wilderness additions during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE n) by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Committee: Andrew G
    Late Pleistocene and Holocene aged Glacial and Climate Reconstructions in the Goat Rocks Wilderness, Washington, United States By Joshua Andrews Heard Master of Science in Geology Thesis Committee: Andrew G. Fountain, Chair Scott F. Burns Jim E. O’Connor Portland State University ©2012 ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Joshua Andrews Heard for the Master of Science in Geology presented May 8th, 2012. Title: Late Pleistocene and Holocene aged Glacial and Climate Reconstructions in the Goat Rocks Wilderness, Washington, United States Eight glaciers, covering an area of 1.63 km2, reside on the northern and northeastern slopes of the Goat Rocks tallest peaks in the Cascades of central Washington. At least three glacial stands occurred downstream from these glaciers. Closest to modern glacier termini are Little Ice Age (LIA) moraines that were deposited between 1870 and 1899 AD, according to the lichenometric analysis. They are characterized by sharp, minimally eroded crests, little to no soil cover, and minimal vegetation cover. Glacier reconstructions indicate that LIA glaciers covered 8.29 km2, 76% more area than modern ice coverage. The average LIA equilibrium line altitude (ELA) of 1995 ± 70 m is ~150 m below the average modern ELA of 2149 ± 76 m. To satisfy climate conditions at the LIA ELA, the winter snow accumulation must have been 8 to 43 cm greater and mean summer temperatures 0.2 to 1.3 ºC cooler than they are now. Late Pleistocene to early Holocene (LPEH) aged moraines are located between 100 and 400 m below the LIA deposits. They have degraded moraine crests, few surface boulders, and considerable vegetation and soil cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Hamilton Buttes Quadrangle, Southern Cascade
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the Hamilton Buttes quadrangle, southern Cascade Range, Washington by Donald A. Swanson1 Open-File Report 96-0016 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'U.S. Geological Survey, University of Washington, Department of Geological Sciences, Box 351310, Seattle, Washington 98195-1310 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................. 1 FIGURES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................... 2 1. Map showing location of Hamilton Buttes quadrangle ROCK TERMINOLOGY AND CHEMICAL relative to other quadrangles and the Southern CLASSIFICATION .......................... 3 Washington Cascades Conductor .......- 2 GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW OF QUADRANGLE ...... 6 2. Map of Hamilton Buttes quadrangle, showing locali­ TERTIARY ROCKS OLDER THAN INTRUSIVE ties mentioned in text ..................... 3 SUITE OF KIDD CREEK ..................... 8 3. Total alkali-silica classification diagram for rocks in Arkose of Chambers Creek (map unit Tsc) ........ 8 Hamilton Buttes quadrangle ................ 3 Significance of interbedded arkose and volcanic 4. Plot of phenocryst assemblage vs. SiO2 for rocks in sandstone ............................. 9 Hamilton Buttes quadrangle ................ 6 Relation to SWCC ........................ 10 5. Locations of samples
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Availability Assessment
    Assessment of the Availability of Groundwater for Residential Development in the Rural Parts of Yakima County, Washington January 2016 John Vaccaro, Vaccaro G.W. Consulting, LLC (Under Contract by Yakima County) For Technical Analysis and Assessment of Groundwater Mitigation Strategies Table of Contents Foreword and Acnowledgments ………………………..…………………………………………………………………vi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Purpose and Scope of this Report .............................................................................................................................. 7 Characterization of Groundwater Domains Department of Ecology Scoping Map ......................................................................................................................... 7 Information Analyzed for Characterization of Domains ............................................................................................. 10 Background Information ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Map and Data Information ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Land ownership
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Census of the North Fork Tieton River, Yakima River Basin
    Final Report Fish Census of the North Fork Tieton River, Yakima River Basin, Washington December 15, 2005 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mid-Columbia Fishery Resource Office Yakima Sub-Office 1917 Marsh Road Yakima, WA 98901 Background During the summers of 2002 and 2003 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Mid- Columbia Fishery Resource Office (MCRFRO) conducted presence/absence surveys for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Yakima Basin. These surveys were conducted by snorkeling, at night, in randomly selected sampling units in accordance with the protocol developed by Peterson et al. (2002) for determining the occurrence of bull trout. In 2002, staff conducted these surveys in the upper Cle Elum River above Cle Elum Lake. In 2003, the surveys were conducted in the Waptus River, a tributary of the upper Cle Elum River. It was the original intent of the MCRFRO to continue presence/absence surveys in the middle fork of the Teanaway River during the summer of 2004. However, biologists from the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Cle Elum Ranger District, had already undertaken this effort in 2003. With monies left from the original funding for that study, alternative bull trout survey work was considered. The North Fork of the Tieton River (North Fork) was chosen as the stream in which additional surveys to determine the presence of bull trout would fill the most important information need. The North Fork was identified in the Service’s Draft Recovery Plan (USFWS 2002) as a stream where a local population of bull trout should be reestablished. The river is also designated as Critical Habitat for bull trout (69 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests Roads Analysis: Naches Sub-Basin March 2004 Core Team Members Marge Hutchinson Team Leader, South Zone Engineer Alan Christian Transportation Planner Carl Davis Forest Soil Scientist Bill Gaines Forest Wildlife Biologist Andrea Gold Wildlife Biologist Ken MacDonald Forest Fisheries Biologist Tom Robinson Forest Hydrologist Roger Skistad District Recreation Officer District Team Members Jim Bailey Fire Management Glynis Bauer GIS Specialist Chuck Davey Special Uses, Road Management Peter Forbes District Wildlife Biologist Bill Garrigues District Hydrologist Chris Gosnell GIS Specialist Scott Hoefer District Fish Biologist Sue Ranger Recreation Planner Jerry Robbins Road Manager Dave Tharp Timber Management Review Team Jodi Bush Wildlife Biologist, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Jim Furlong Natural Resource Planner, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests, U.S.D.A Forest Service Virginia Grilley Assistant Regional Engineer, Region 6, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Dan Robinson Environmental Protection Specialist, Region 10, Environmental Protection Agency For more information contact: U.S.D.A. Forest Service Naches Ranger District 10061 Highway 12 Naches, WA 98937 Contents Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests Roads Analysis: Naches Sub-Basin ....... i Contents............................................................................................ iii List of Figures ..................................................................................... vi List of Tables .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Assessment Report Storage Dam Fish Passage Study
    Phase I Assessment Report Storage Dam Fish Passage Study Yakima Project, Washington Technical Series No. PN-YDFP-001 U.S. Department of the Interior September 2003 Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho Revised April 2005 U.S. Department of the Interior Mission Statement The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Mission Statement The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Yakima Dams Fish Passage Assessment Goal Statement The goal of the Yakima Dams Fish Passage Assessment is to determine the feasibility of building fish passage facilities at Yakima Project storage dams, recommend construction where feasible, and develop and recommend alternatives at sites where passage is not feasible. This document should be cited as follows: Phase I Assessment Report, Storage Dam Fish Passage Study, Yakima Project, Washington, Technical Series No. PN-YDFP-001, Bureau of Reclamation, Boise, Idaho, February 2003. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN RIVER MILE INDEX YAKIMA RIVER Xeche!;,; River Cle jm Hi"", WASHINGTON Middle Fork To""""o/ Ri~"f Kocl!es$ ,~ '!:!:-a;; ! Loke Rive No{!e= Cfuk 191.0 .,,,,,{"'I \/ Little Noch"s Rive, Norfh Ferll Man(J$f(lsll ene/( ~) Sfwth Fork ELLENSBURG Amertcan MaM!stosh Ct""" Riv;1r Norfh Fork W..nqs Creek Umfo",Jm Cre"k SW//l Ferk Bllmping Wenqs CrB 1/ Rive' Bumping Loke Sill/OW Cree" Tieton Reserlloir 50<1'" Fork Cawic"" Crt1fJII I~;::' ~;! 'II SOU'h Fod ril;!on River S(}JJfll Fork AMonum Cr8"k TOPPENISH rn SUNNYSIDE ao.4 EID [jj MABTON I:3Z3S1a·PMO·E 7·14·64 YAKIMA DAMS FISH PASSAGE PHASE I ASSESSMENT REPORT CONTENTS SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................Summary – 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL: Preliminary Integrated Water Resource Management Plan for The
    Final Report Preliminary Integrated Water Resource Management Plan for the Yakima River Basin Yakima Project Washington Prepared by: HDR Engineering Anchor QEA ESA Adolfson U.S. Department of the Interior State of Washington Bureau of Reclamation Department of Ecology Pacific Northwest Region Office of Columbia River Columbia-Cascades Area Office December 2009 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. The mission of the Department of Ecology is to protect, preserve and enhance Washington’s environment, and promote the wise management of our air, land and water for the benefit of current and future generations Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Purpose ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 Previous YRBWEP Activities and More Recent Studies ........................... 3 1.2 Workgroup Efforts and Recommendation .................................................. 4 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................. 7 2 Water Resources Needs in the Yakima Basin......................................................... 7 3 Preliminary Integrated
    [Show full text]