DOCSLIB.ORG

The 1980-1982 Geothermal Resource Assessment Program in Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE 1980-1982 GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM IN WASHINGTON by Michael A. Korosec, William M. Phillips, and J. Eric Schuster with contributions from Z.F. Danes, J.H. Biggane, P.E. Hammond, and G.A. Clayton With chapters on thermal springs, gravity investigations, heat-flow drilling, low-temperature resources in eastern Washington, geology of the south Cascades and White Pass areas, and targets for geothermal resource exploration Washington State Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington 98504 Open File Report 83-7 Prepared Under U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC07-79ET27014 August 1983 THE 1980-1982 GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM IN WASHINGTON by Michael A. Korosec, William M. Phillips, and J. Eric Schuster with contributions from Z.F. Danes, J.H. Biggane, P.E. Hammond, and G.A. Clayton With chapters on thermal springs, gravity investigations, heat-flow drilling, low-temperature resources in eastern Washington, geology of the south Cascades and White Pass areas, and targets for geothermal resource exploration Washington State Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington 98504 Open File Report 83-7 Prepared Under U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC07-79ET27014 August 1983 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Geothermal program publications 5 3. Surveys and geochemical analyses of thermal and mineral springs in Washington, 1980-1981 by Michael A. Korosec 8 Introduction 9 Methods 10 Results 11 Discussion 21 Individual spring system investigations 34 Ahtanum Soda Springs 35 Geothermal features 35 Geology 36 Heat flow 37 Comments 37 Bumping River Soda Springs 38 Geothermal features 38 Geology 39 Heat flow 39 Comments 40 Flaming Geyser Springs 41 Geothermal features . 41 Geology 42 Heat flow 43 Comments 43 Goldmeyer Hot Springs 44 Geothermal features 44 Geology 45 Heat flow 45 Comments 46 Government Mineral and Little Soda Springs 47 Geothermal features 47 Geology 49 Heat flow 50 Comments 50 Klickitat Mineral Springs 51 Geothermal features 51 Geology 53 Heat flow 53 Comment 54 Rock Creek Hot Springs 55 Geothermal features 55 Geology 56 Heat flow 57 Comments 57 Scenic Hot Springs 58 Geothermal features 58 Geology 60 Heat Flow 61 Comments 61 St. Martins (Carson) and Shipherds Hot Springs... 62 Geothermal features 62 Geology..... 63 Heat flow 64 Comments 65 References 66 4. Progress report for the regional gravity survey of the Cascade Mountain Range, Washington, by William M. Phillips 68 Introduction 69 Discussion 69 Conclusion 77 References... 78 5. Preliminary interpretation of regional gravity information from the southern Cascade Mountains of Washington, by William M. Phillips . 79 Introduction 80 Regional geology 81 Regional gravity patterns 91 Interpretation of gravity data 93 Discussion 109 Conclusion 116 References 118 6. Heat-Flow Drilling in Washington during 1981, by Michael A. Korosec and J. Eric Schuster 120 Introduction 121 Results 123 Description of units penetrated by drill holes 123 Scenic No. 1 123 Scenic No. 2 123 Snoqualmie No. 1 152 Snoqualmie No. 2 152 White River 152 Clear Creek 153 Sand Ridge 153 Tieton Willows 153 Trout Creek 154 Carson 154 Klickitat 155 North Bonneville Nos. 1, 2, and 3 155 References 157 7. The low temperature geothermal resources of Eastern Washington, by Michael A. Korosec, William M. Phillips, and J. Eric Schuster 159 Introduction 160 Past work and some inherent problems 161 Data sources 161 Bottom hole temperature 162 Surface temperature 163 New data collection 164 Data manipulation 164 Cascades 167 Columbia Basin 175 Yakima and Ahtanum-Simcoe areas 175 Moses Lake-Ritzville-Connell areas 176 Lincoln 176 Douglas 1 77 Horse Heaven Hills 177 Lower Yakima Valley 177 Walla Walla 177 Other areas 178 Conclusion 178 References 179 8. Progress Report of the Time-Space-Composition Model for the Quaternary Volcanics of the South Cascades, Washington, by Paul E. Hammond and Michael A. Korosec 180 Introduction 181 Work to date 182 Discussion 182 Future work 1 90 References 191 9. Pliocene and Pleistocene Volcanic History of the White Pass-Tumac Plateau Region, Washington by Geoffrey A. Clayton 192 Introduction 193 Regional geology 194 Pliocene and Pleistocene volcanism 196 Rhyolites (and basalt) of the Devils Horns 201 Field occurrence 203 Rock description 205 Geologic relations and significance 205 Devils Washbasin basalt 206 Porphyritic andesite of the Goat Rocks volcano 208 Field occurrence 209 Rock description 210 Geologic relations and significance 210 Dacite porphyry 213 Field occurrence 213 Rock description 214 Geologic relations and significance 215 Hogback Mountain mafic magma-type: olivine-bearing basalts and basaltic-andesites 218 Field occurrence 221 Rock description 223 Geologic relations and significance 225 Hornblende andesites 228 Field occurrence 230 Rock description 236 Geologic relations and significance 238 Summary of Pliocene and Pleistocene volcanism 240 References 245 10. Geohydrologic Studies of the Yakima Valley Area, Washington, by John H. Biggane and Division of Geology and Earth Resources staff 252 Introduction 253 Previous geothermal work 255 Ground-water hydrology of the Yakima region 255 The sedimentary aquifer 255 The basalt aquifer 256 The sedimentary interbeds (Selah, Mabton, Quincy(?), Squaw Creek, and Vantage members).. 256 Temperature data 257 Discussion of results 258 Determination of geothermal gradients in the Yakima region 258 Conclusions 262 References 267 11. Geothermal Resource Targets: Progress and Proposals by Michael A. Korosec 268 Introduction 269 Geothermal target area descriptions 269 Olympic and Sol Duc Hot Springs 269 Glacier Peak 272 Mount Baker 274 Central Cascades 275 South Cascades 277 Columbia Gorge-Wind River area 279 Goat Rocks 282 Mount Adams 283 Mount Rainier 284 Mount St. Helens 284 Simcoe Mountains and Klickitat area 286 Tumac Mountain-White Pass area 287 References 291 12. Additions to the Bibliography of Geothermal Resource MichaeInformatiol A.n Korosefor thc e State of Washington, by 294 FIGURES Figure 3-1. Trilinear plot of percentage of reacting anions for thermal and mineral springs and wells of Washington ... 33 4-1. Number of gravity stations per 5 square miles in the Cascade study area 70 4-2. Comparison of Hammer zone sectors with 30 second digital terrain blocks 75 5-1. Index map showing location of the southern Cascade Mountains study area and major geologic elements of the Cascade Mountain Range 82 5-2. Geologic map of the southern Cascade Mountains study area 83 5-3. Tectonic map of the southern Cascade Mountains study area showing location of major faults and fold axes.... 90 5-4. Compilation gravity anomaly map of the Pacific Northwest 92 5-5. Gravity and structural profile along section line 94 5-6. CascadComplete e MountainBouguer s gravity anomaly map of the southern 95 5-7. Regional Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the southern Cascade Mountains 98 5-8. Residual Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the southern Cascade Mountains 100 5-9. Section A-A' 101 5-10. Section B-B' 103 5-11 . Section C-C' 104 5-12. Section D-D' 106 5-13. Section E-E' 108 6-1. RangeLocatio, n198 ma1 p for heat-flow drill holes, Cascade 122 6-2. Composite temperature-depth plots for Scenic No. 1, Scenic No. 2, Snoqualmie No. 1, Snoqualmie No. 2, and White River drill holes 135 Figure 6-3. Composite temperature-depth plots for Clear Creek, Sand Ridge, Tieton Willows, Trout Creek, Carson, and Klickitat drill holes 136 6-4. Composite temperature-depth plots for North Bonneville No. 1, North Bonneville No. 2, and North Bonneville No. 3 drill holes 137 6-5. Temperature-depth plot for Scenic No. 1 drill hole 138 6-6. Temperature-depth plot for Scenic No. 2 drill hole 139 6-7. Temperature-depth plot for Snoqualmie No. 1 drill hole 140 6-8. Temperature-depth plot for Snoqualmie No. 2 drill hole 141 6-9. Temperature-depth plot for White River drill hole 142 6-10. Temperature-depth plot for Clear Creek drill hole 143 6-11. Temperature-depth plot for Sand Ridge drill hole 144 6-12. Temperature-depth plot for Tieton Willows drill hole... 145 6-13. Temperature-depth plot for Trout Creek drill hole 146 6-14. Temperature-depth plot for Carson drill hole 147 6-15. Temperature-depth plot for Klickitat drill hole 148 6-16. drilTemperature-deptl hole h plot for North Bonneville No. 1 149 6-17. Temperature-depth plot for North Bonneville No. 2 drill hole 150 6-18. Temperature-depth plot for North Bonneville No. 3 drill hole 151 Figure 7-1. Temperature gradient contour map of Washington 168 7-2. Low-temperature geothermal resource areas in Washington 169 8-1. Index map showing zones of volcanism and project area in southern Washington Cascade Range 183 8-2. Mount St. Helens zone: Elk Pass-Marble Mountain- Soda Peaks-Trout Creek Hill-Mowich Butte 186 8-3. Indian Heaven zone: E. Canyon Creek, Steamboat Mountain-Lemei Rock-Red Mountain-Cedar Creek 187 8-4. Mount Adams zone: Walupt L.-King Mountain-Quigley Butte-Gilmer-Snowden 188 8-5. Columbia River Gorge zone: Prune Hill-Bobs Mountain- Beacon Rock-Underwood Mountain-McCoy Flat 189 9-1. Distribution of pre-Tertiary rocks 195 9-2. Summary of age data for the Pliocene and Quaternary volcanoes of the White Pass area 199 9-3. Location map of important outcrops of Pliocene to Pleistocene age igneous rocks 202 9-4. Location map of hornblende andesite and Hogback Mountain mafic magma-type vents and significant outcrops of these associated rock types 219 9-5. Schematic cross-section through the Pleistocene volcanic rocks in the White Pass-Tumac Plateau area ... 242 10-1. Location of study area 254 10-2. Plofor t welof l bottodatam grouholpe 4temperatur e vs. bottom hole depth 259 10-3. Plot of bottom hole temperature vs.
Recommended publications
  • Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply by Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply

    Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply by Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply

    Irrigation flume wends way from Panther Creek toward yet-to-be-built High Bridge over Wind River. Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply By Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply By Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society E. J. Weigle home north of Carson. (This and other photos presented to Skamania County Historical Museum by Paul Boyd.) Much of the soil of the Carson Valley is a shallow sandy layer deposited on top of the geologically recent Trout Creek Olivine basalt lava flow. This is the lava flow which filled the Wind River canyon to a considerable depth, dammed the Columbia River, and created the Panther Creek reef or lava dike which is described later in this article. The soil, while fertile and productive, dries out quickly and crops grown in this valley require frequent watering in the summertime. Contra to this statement is the knowledge that the early strawberry fields produced well with no irrigation water. During the first decade of the 1900s, entrepreneur and promoter, B. M. Hawley of Home Valley, Washington, and his associates began action upon their dream to convert the heavily timbered Carson Valley into an agricultural paradise. These gentlemen indulged their expensive fantasy to inititate construction of an irrigation flume which to exrend from Panther Creek six to eight miles to the semi-level Carson Valley plain as we know it now in 1984. Carson Water Supply — Page 2 Skamania County records show that on 1 April 1907 B. M. Hawley filed for a water right on Panther Creek, tributary to Wind River, for 60 cubic feet per second of water, giving the point of diversion and stating it was for irrigation, power, and domestic use.
  • ªª47 ªª47 ªª63 ªª85 ªª85 ªª84 ªª84 ªª48 ªª45 ªª26 ªª56 ªª21 ªª22 ªª22 ªª55 ªª55

    ªª47 ªª47 ªª63 ªª85 ªª85 ªª84 ªª84 ªª48 ªª45 ªª26 ªª56 ªª21 ªª22 ªª22 ªª55 ªª55

    Gifford Pinchot National Forest Special Forest Products Map: North Half R. 2 E. R. 3 E. R. 4 E. R. 5 E. R. 6 E. R. 7 E. R. 8 E. R. 9 E. R. 10 E. R. 11 E. Puyallup Point Lower C edar Lake N Aurora Peak Ceda r Lake 6 1 . Swa mp Lake 8 1 6 3 2 Bald Hill Glacier V8 iew 2 . 6 2 1 Alder T Shriner Peak Cou gar Lake Green Hill &M Alder Reservoir 2 6 7 2 Gla4cier View Wilderness 5 8 G 9 obblers Knob 7 2 . 0 4 Reliance H 9 ill 0 Mount Beljica 0 N Mount Wow 0 .1 9 4 0 2 5 Elbe Crag Mountain 1 7409017 &M Ashford . &M 706 5900037 T 0 0 5 Stahl Mountain Tumtum Peak 0 2 0 0 Bald Mountain 0 0 28 4 8 BIG CRE E K 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 7400000 0 52 0 6 0 7 Ladd Mou ª 42 4 ntain 5 Mineral Lake Fry "2 ingpan Moun 0 tain 0 9 9 0 Butter 3 0 4 85 Creek RNA 4 0 0 7 5 ª 2 Huckle ª berry Mountain 2 5 7 Roundtop Mo 2 4 untain 2 0 5 2 0 4 Cougar Mo 5 5 2 7 untain 0 .1 &M 5 8 1 2 4 8 50 0 O 0 L 1B 5 sborne Mountain 4 ookout Mountain 16 4 00 7 Jug Lake 41 0 Mineral 0 ª52 0 0 1 1 6 44 9 2 1 5 0 0 84 0 4 4 0 0 A .
  • Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book

    Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book

    A Standards-Aligned Project & Puzzle Guide for Grades K-4 Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book ISBN: 978-0-9965073-2-5 Written & Illustrated by Jacqueline S. Gutierrez Published by Sprouting Seed Press My hope is to raise awareness of the beauty and significance of these wonderful gifts of nature, to encourage maintenance and preservation of the existing springs, and hopefully to provide interest in the restoration of some previously decommissioned springs. The mineral springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa are a rare natural resource since there are few such places in the world where clean, drinkable mineral water springs are available. - Jacqueline S. Gutierrez Guide created by Debbie Gonzales, MFA 2 The puzzles and projects featured in this guide are intented to support the content presented in the Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book. Students are encouraged to preuse the coloring book for the solutions to the puzzles presented in this guide. Students may work through the puzzles and projects in either an individual or collaborative manner. Table of Contents Historical Mix & Match Puzzle ..................................................................................................................3 Saratoga Springs Vertical Puzzle ...........................................................................................................4 The Minerals of Saratoga Mineral Springs .........................................................................................
  • Springs of California

    Springs of California

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 338 SPRINGS OF CALIFORNIA BY GEKALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. lntroduction by W. C. Mendenhall ... .. ................................... 5 Physical features of California ...... ....... .. .. ... .. ....... .............. 7 Natural divisions ................... ... .. ........................... 7 Coast Ranges ..................................... ....•.......... _._._ 7 11 ~~:~~::!:: :~~e:_-_-_·.-.·.·: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::: 12 Sierra Nevada .................... .................................... 12 Southeastern desert ......................... ............. .. ..... ... 13 Faults ..... ....... ... ................ ·.. : ..... ................ ..... 14 Natural waters ................................ _.......................... 15 Use of terms "mineral water" and ''pure water" ............... : .·...... 15 ,,uneral analysis of water ................................ .. ... ........ 15 Source and amount of substances in water ................. ............. 17 Degree of concentration of natural waters ........................ ..· .... 21 Properties of mineral waters . ................... ...... _. _.. .. _... _....• 22 Temperature of natural waters ... : ....................... _.. _..... .... : . 24 Classification of mineral waters ............ .......... .. .. _. .. _......... _ 25 Therapeutic value of waters .................................... ... ... 26 Analyses
  • Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico

    Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico

    GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO By Frank W. Trainer, Robert J. Rogers, and Michael L. Sorey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 5338 Montgomery NE, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311 Information regarding research and data-collection programs of the U.S. Geological Survey is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the Home Page for the New Mexico District Office using the URL: http://nm.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................ 2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................................
  • Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit

    Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit

    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit 353 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 11 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 11. Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit The Yakima River CHU supports adfluvial, fluvial, and resident life history forms of bull trout. This CHU includes the mainstem Yakima River and tributaries from its confluence with the Columbia River upstream from the mouth of the Columbia River upstream to its headwaters at the crest of the Cascade Range. The Yakima River CHU is located on the eastern slopes of the Cascade Range in south-central Washington and encompasses the entire Yakima River basin located between the Klickitat and Wenatchee Basins. The Yakima River basin is one of the largest basins in the state of Washington; it drains southeast into the Columbia River near the town of Richland, Washington. The basin occupies most of Yakima and Kittitas Counties, about half of Benton County, and a small portion of Klickitat County. This CHU does not contain any subunits because it supports one core area. A total of 1,177.2 km (731.5 mi) of stream habitat and 6,285.2 ha (15,531.0 ac) of lake and reservoir surface area in this CHU are proposed as critical habitat. One of the largest populations of bull trout (South Fork Tieton River population) in central Washington is located above the Tieton Dam and supports the core area.
  • Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area Conceptual Design for Freshwater Restoration

    Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area Conceptual Design for Freshwater Restoration

    WARM MINERAL SPRINGS FOCAL AREA CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR FRESHWATER RESTORATION Final Report 5 November 2012 Steven J. Herrington, Ph.D. Director of Freshwater Conservation The Nature Conservancy, Florida Chapter FWC Agreement Number: 11043 1 ABSTRACT The Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area is considered the most important winter refuge site for the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) in the southern portion of its range in the Gulf of Mexico in Florida. However, natural resource managers are concerned that historical and current alterations of Warm Mineral Springs, Warm Mineral Springs Creek, and Salt Creek may reduce access and degrade habitat quality for Florida manatees in the system. The objectives of this study were to conduct a watershed assessment for river stability and sediment supply and develop conceptual designs for restoring the ecological condition, fluvial geomorphology, and habitat quality and accessibility for Florida manatees in the Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area. Historical and current land use alteration and management, bank erosion and excessive sedimentation, and invasive riparian plant species were identified as the primary factors degrading the focal area. Five project areas were defined for restoration, including Project 1: Bank Stabilization of the Warm Mineral Springs Pool at the Warm Mineral Springs Resort and Day Spa; Project 2: Bank Stabilization and Channel Restoration of Warm Mineral Springs Creek at the Warm Mineral Springs Resort and Day Spa; Project 3: Stream Channel Restoration of Warm Mineral Springs Creek; Project 4: Riparian Corridor Restoration for Optimizing Manatee Winter Refuge Habitat in Warm Mineral Springs Creek; and Project 5: Stream Channel Restoration of Salt Creek. Restoration can be implemented at these sites either independently or concomitantly.
  • IC-62, Heat Flow Studies in the Steamboat Mountain-Lemei Rock

    IC-62, Heat Flow Studies in the Steamboat Mountain-Lemei Rock

    ,. \\ :\ .J ~\ .... 7 \; t,6 i u2 W~~fnffl:RY u.no C ';I, .... DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES i n BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands ; RALPH A. BESWICK Supervisor I: s DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR 62 HEAT FLOW STUDIES IN THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN-LEMEI ROCK AREA, SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY J. ERIC SCHUSTER, DAVID D. BLACKWELL, PAUL E. HAMMOND, and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING Final report to the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION on sponsored proiect AER75 ... 02747 1978 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BERT L COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands RALPH A. BESWICK Supervisor DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR WA He<1.t iluw 33.J. -7 stu.diei::,; ln the .M6 t> i Stean, l:on. t --- bJ. ~uu,i ta i u-.Lem~ i 1970 Jiuck d.rea, Skaina11ia Cuunt),, W a i'ii1 i u ~ton HEAT FLOW STUDIES IN THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN-LEMEI ROCK AREA, SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY J. ERIC SCHUSTER, DAVID D. BLACKWELL, PAUL E. HAMMOND, and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING Final report to the NATIONAL SC !ENCE FOUNDATION on sponsored project AER75-02747 1978 CONTENTS Abstract ................. , . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Introduction ..................................................................... , • . 2 Acknowledgments • • • • • • . • • . • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . 3 Geo logy • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • . • • . • . • . • • . • . 4 Genera I features ............................
  • Aquatics Specialist Report

    Aquatics Specialist Report

    United States Department of Aquatics Specialist Agriculture Forest Report Service Four Forest Restoration Initiative Flagstaff Ranger District, Coconino National Forest, Coconino County, Arizona. Williams and Tusayan Ranger District, Kaibab National Forest Mogollon and Red Rock Ranger Districts – small acreages included Date: October 26, 2011 Revision Date: September 4, 2014 October 29, 2014 Prepared by: Michael R. Childs, Forest Fisheries Biologist Signature: /s/ Michael R. Childs 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Existing and Desired Conditions ............................................................................................................... 6 Forest Structure and Spatial Pattern ....................................................................................................... 6 Forest Structure – Old Growth................................................................................................................ 9 Forest
  • Mineral Waters

    Mineral Waters

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY J. \V. POWELL. DIRECTOR MINERAL WATERS BY A. C. PEALE ABSTRACT EROM “MINERAL RESOURCES OF TJIE UNITED STATES CALENDAR YEARS 1889 AND 1890”—DAVID T. DAY, CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MINING STATISTICS AND TECHNOLOGY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1892 DEPARTMENT OF TIIE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY J. W. POWELL, DIRECTOR MINERAL WATERS BY A. C. PEALE ABSTRACT FROM “MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE UNITED STATES CALENDAR YEARS 1889 AND 1890”—DAVID T. DAY, CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MINING STATISTICS AND TECHNOLOGY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1892 MINERAL WATERS. A. C. Peale. The production of mineral waters for 1889 from 258 springs was 12,780,471 gallons, valued at $1,748,458. This was an increase of 3,201,823 gallons, and the increase in the value of the product was $09,156. For 1890 the total number of springs was increased to 273, and of this number 220 springs have reported their sales, which amounted to 12,215,187 gallons, valued at $2,493,948. If for the 53 springs delin- quent at the time of making up this report we estimate the product and value at the same as given for 1889, we would have a total produc- tion of 15,691,650 gallons, with a valuation of $2,839,223. In the tables, however, the delinquent springs have been estimated at a little less than one-lialf the figures of 1889, giving for the totals the following figures: 13,907,418 gallons, with a value of $2,600,750.
  • Flood Insurance Rate Map, North Providence, Ri

    Flood Insurance Rate Map, North Providence, Ri

    SDMS DocID 5761 PANEL NUMBER 0002 C NAUOML FUM INSURANCE PROGUUI FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP TOWN OP NORTH PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCB OOUNTT 0003 C MAP INDEX MAP REPOSITORY PANELS PHNIED. 1.2.3 Building Inspector's Office. 2000 Smith Street, North Providence, Rhode Island 02911 (Maps available for reference only, not for distribution.) COMMUNnY-PANEL NUMBERS 440020 0001-0003 MAP REVISED' DECEMBER 6.1999 Federal Emetgenqr Muugement Agency LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood by Federal flood protection system under con­ struction; no base flood elevations deter­ mined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undeter­ mined, but possible. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS* \ ^ iXx Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 or Later Protected Areas Identified 1991 or Later "Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas.
  • NEON Site-Level Plot Summary Wind River Experimental Forest (WREF)

    NEON Site-Level Plot Summary Wind River Experimental Forest (WREF)

    NEON Site-Level Plot Summary Wind River Experimental Forest (WREF) Document Information Date March 14, 2019 Author Erik Dahlke, Senior Regional Soil Scientist Soil Survey Region 1, Portland, OR Site Background The Wind River Experimental Forest NEON site (WREF) site is approximately 60 kilometers northeast of Vancouver in Skamania County, Washington. The WREF site is at the United States Forest Service (USFS) Pacific Northwest Research Station – Wind River Experimental Station in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest (GPNF). WREF covers roughly 10,360 acres within Major Land Resource Area 3 (MLRA 3) – Olympic and Cascade Mountains. Most of the area lacks a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey; a small portion occurs within the 1990 Soil Survey of Skamania County, Area, Washington (WA659). A USFS Soil Resource Inventory (SRI) is available for GPNF. This product, produced at a smaller scale than NRCS soil maps, provides inventory information for geology, landform, and slope, as well as general soil groupings. Site Information The WREF site has varied relief. Elevation and slope ranges were derived from a digital elevation model (DEM), and range from slightly less than 300 meters to over 1275 meters; slope gradients range from 0 to more than 90 percent. Mean annual precipitation is between 2200 millimeters to about 3000 millimeters based on data from the PRISM (Parameter-elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model) Climate Group at Oregon State University. The WREF site consists of two distinct land areas referred to here as the ‘East Unit’ and ‘West Unit’. The West Unit contains the NEON instrument tower and all but six of the NEON distributed plots.