DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquatics Specialist Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquatics Specialist Report United States Department of Aquatics Specialist Agriculture Forest Report Service Four Forest Restoration Initiative Flagstaff Ranger District, Coconino National Forest, Coconino County, Arizona. Williams and Tusayan Ranger District, Kaibab National Forest Mogollon and Red Rock Ranger Districts – small acreages included Date: October 26, 2011 Revision Date: September 4, 2014 October 29, 2014 Prepared by: Michael R. Childs, Forest Fisheries Biologist Signature: /s/ Michael R. Childs 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Existing and Desired Conditions ............................................................................................................... 6 Forest Structure and Spatial Pattern ....................................................................................................... 6 Forest Structure – Old Growth................................................................................................................ 9 Forest Health – Insect and Disease ....................................................................................................... 11 Vegetation Diversity and Composition ................................................................................................. 13 Forest Resiliency .................................................................................................................................. 17 Soil Productivity and Watershed Function............................................................................................ 18 Roads and Unauthorized Routes ........................................................................................................... 22 Decision Framework............................................................................................................................. 23 Other Planning Efforts .......................................................................................................................... 23 Relationship to the Forest Plans ........................................................................................................... 23 Management Direction ......................................................................................................................... 23 Alternatives Considered in Detail ............................................................................................................ 28 Alternative A ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Alternative B ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Alternative C ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Alternative D ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Alternative E ......................................................................................................................................... 28 Actions Common to Alternatives (B–E) .................................................................................................. 29 Alternative B – Proposed Action .............................................................................................................. 36 Amendment 1 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 36 Amendment 2 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 36 Amendment 3 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 37 Alternative C – Preferred Alternative ..................................................................................................... 38 Amendment 1 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 39 Amendment 2 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 39 Amendment 3 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 39 Alternative D ............................................................................................................................................. 41 Amendment 1 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 42 Amendment 2 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 42 Amendment 3 (Coconino) .................................................................................................................... 42 Alternative E.............................................................................................................................................. 44 Affected Environment............................................................................................................................... 49 Restoration Units and Subunits ............................................................................................................ 49 Special Status Fish Species’ Natural History and Occurrence.............................................................. 54 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................................... 56 Candidate Species ................................................................................................................................. 58 Forest Service Sensitive Species .......................................................................................................... 59 Management Indicator Species............................................................................................................. 62 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................................. 68 Units of Measure .................................................................................................................................. 68 2 General Direct Effects of Vegetation Management and Prescribed Fire (Common to Alternatives B-E) .............................................................................................................................................................. 73 General Indirect Effects of Vegetation Management and Prescribed Fire (Common to Alternatives B- E) .......................................................................................................................................................... 73 General Direct and Indirect Effects of Wildfire (Common to Alternatives B-E) ................................. 74 Direct and Indirect Effects of Spring Restoration (Common to Alternatives B-E) .............................. 74 Direct and Indirect Effects of Stream Restoration (Common to Alternatives B-E) ............................. 76 Direct and Indirect Effects of Road Restoration and Decommissioning (Common to Alternatives B-E) .............................................................................................................................................................. 77 Direct and Indirect Effects of Dust Abatement (Common to Alternatives B-E) .................................. 78 Resource Protection Measures ................................................................................................................. 79 Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................................... 86 Effects of Forest Plan Amendments on Aquatic Species and Habitat .................................................. 98 Effects of Alternatives on Aquatic Habitat ............................................................................................. 99 Species Effects ......................................................................................................................................... 112 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species ............................................................................... 112 Candidate Species ............................................................................................................................... 119 Forest Sensitive Species ..................................................................................................................... 125 Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta) ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book
    A Standards-Aligned Project & Puzzle Guide for Grades K-4 Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book ISBN: 978-0-9965073-2-5 Written & Illustrated by Jacqueline S. Gutierrez Published by Sprouting Seed Press My hope is to raise awareness of the beauty and significance of these wonderful gifts of nature, to encourage maintenance and preservation of the existing springs, and hopefully to provide interest in the restoration of some previously decommissioned springs. The mineral springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa are a rare natural resource since there are few such places in the world where clean, drinkable mineral water springs are available. - Jacqueline S. Gutierrez Guide created by Debbie Gonzales, MFA 2 The puzzles and projects featured in this guide are intented to support the content presented in the Mineral Springs of Saratoga Springs and Ballston Spa Coloring Book. Students are encouraged to preuse the coloring book for the solutions to the puzzles presented in this guide. Students may work through the puzzles and projects in either an individual or collaborative manner. Table of Contents Historical Mix & Match Puzzle ..................................................................................................................3 Saratoga Springs Vertical Puzzle ...........................................................................................................4 The Minerals of Saratoga Mineral Springs .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Springs of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 338 SPRINGS OF CALIFORNIA BY GEKALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. lntroduction by W. C. Mendenhall ... .. ................................... 5 Physical features of California ...... ....... .. .. ... .. ....... .............. 7 Natural divisions ................... ... .. ........................... 7 Coast Ranges ..................................... ....•.......... _._._ 7 11 ~~:~~::!:: :~~e:_-_-_·.-.·.·: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::: 12 Sierra Nevada .................... .................................... 12 Southeastern desert ......................... ............. .. ..... ... 13 Faults ..... ....... ... ................ ·.. : ..... ................ ..... 14 Natural waters ................................ _.......................... 15 Use of terms "mineral water" and ''pure water" ............... : .·...... 15 ,,uneral analysis of water ................................ .. ... ........ 15 Source and amount of substances in water ................. ............. 17 Degree of concentration of natural waters ........................ ..· .... 21 Properties of mineral waters . ................... ...... _. _.. .. _... _....• 22 Temperature of natural waters ... : ....................... _.. _..... .... : . 24 Classification of mineral waters ............ .......... .. .. _. .. _......... _ 25 Therapeutic value of waters .................................... ... ... 26 Analyses
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO By Frank W. Trainer, Robert J. Rogers, and Michael L. Sorey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 5338 Montgomery NE, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311 Information regarding research and data-collection programs of the U.S. Geological Survey is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the Home Page for the New Mexico District Office using the URL: http://nm.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................ 2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area Conceptual Design for Freshwater Restoration
    WARM MINERAL SPRINGS FOCAL AREA CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR FRESHWATER RESTORATION Final Report 5 November 2012 Steven J. Herrington, Ph.D. Director of Freshwater Conservation The Nature Conservancy, Florida Chapter FWC Agreement Number: 11043 1 ABSTRACT The Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area is considered the most important winter refuge site for the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) in the southern portion of its range in the Gulf of Mexico in Florida. However, natural resource managers are concerned that historical and current alterations of Warm Mineral Springs, Warm Mineral Springs Creek, and Salt Creek may reduce access and degrade habitat quality for Florida manatees in the system. The objectives of this study were to conduct a watershed assessment for river stability and sediment supply and develop conceptual designs for restoring the ecological condition, fluvial geomorphology, and habitat quality and accessibility for Florida manatees in the Warm Mineral Springs Focal Area. Historical and current land use alteration and management, bank erosion and excessive sedimentation, and invasive riparian plant species were identified as the primary factors degrading the focal area. Five project areas were defined for restoration, including Project 1: Bank Stabilization of the Warm Mineral Springs Pool at the Warm Mineral Springs Resort and Day Spa; Project 2: Bank Stabilization and Channel Restoration of Warm Mineral Springs Creek at the Warm Mineral Springs Resort and Day Spa; Project 3: Stream Channel Restoration of Warm Mineral Springs Creek; Project 4: Riparian Corridor Restoration for Optimizing Manatee Winter Refuge Habitat in Warm Mineral Springs Creek; and Project 5: Stream Channel Restoration of Salt Creek. Restoration can be implemented at these sites either independently or concomitantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Waters
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY J. \V. POWELL. DIRECTOR MINERAL WATERS BY A. C. PEALE ABSTRACT EROM “MINERAL RESOURCES OF TJIE UNITED STATES CALENDAR YEARS 1889 AND 1890”—DAVID T. DAY, CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MINING STATISTICS AND TECHNOLOGY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1892 DEPARTMENT OF TIIE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY J. W. POWELL, DIRECTOR MINERAL WATERS BY A. C. PEALE ABSTRACT FROM “MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE UNITED STATES CALENDAR YEARS 1889 AND 1890”—DAVID T. DAY, CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MINING STATISTICS AND TECHNOLOGY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1892 MINERAL WATERS. A. C. Peale. The production of mineral waters for 1889 from 258 springs was 12,780,471 gallons, valued at $1,748,458. This was an increase of 3,201,823 gallons, and the increase in the value of the product was $09,156. For 1890 the total number of springs was increased to 273, and of this number 220 springs have reported their sales, which amounted to 12,215,187 gallons, valued at $2,493,948. If for the 53 springs delin- quent at the time of making up this report we estimate the product and value at the same as given for 1889, we would have a total produc- tion of 15,691,650 gallons, with a valuation of $2,839,223. In the tables, however, the delinquent springs have been estimated at a little less than one-lialf the figures of 1889, giving for the totals the following figures: 13,907,418 gallons, with a value of $2,600,750.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Rate Map, North Providence, Ri
    SDMS DocID 5761 PANEL NUMBER 0002 C NAUOML FUM INSURANCE PROGUUI FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP TOWN OP NORTH PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCB OOUNTT 0003 C MAP INDEX MAP REPOSITORY PANELS PHNIED. 1.2.3 Building Inspector's Office. 2000 Smith Street, North Providence, Rhode Island 02911 (Maps available for reference only, not for distribution.) COMMUNnY-PANEL NUMBERS 440020 0001-0003 MAP REVISED' DECEMBER 6.1999 Federal Emetgenqr Muugement Agency LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood by Federal flood protection system under con­ struction; no base flood elevations deter­ mined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undeter­ mined, but possible. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS* \ ^ iXx Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 or Later Protected Areas Identified 1991 or Later "Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of North Providence,RI
    5 1 0 2 R E B M E T P E S Town of North Provi dence, RI Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT Town of North Providence Hazard Mitigation Plan- September, 2015 ii Town of North Providence Hazard Mitigation Plan- September, 2015 Acknowledgements The Town of North Providence commends the efforts of its Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee in completing this important plan. The effort is sure to result in the protection of life and property and special thanks are extended to Committee members: Robert Howe, EMA Director Frank Bursie, Director of All Special Projects Mike Carnevale, Building Inspector Nicole Chellel, GIS Coordinator David Westcott, Town Planner Bernie Salvatore, Director of Public Works Lenny Albanese, Fire Chief Christopher Pelagio, Acting Police Chief Ralph Nahigian, Communications Technology Director Ray Medeiros, Battalion Chief, EMS Mayor Charles A. Lombardi North Providence Town Council Dina Autiello (President)- District 3 Mansuet Giusti- District 1 Stephen Feoloa- District 1 Raymond DeStefanis- District 2 William Warren- District 2 Kristen Catanzara- District 3 Alice Brady- Council-at-Large North Providence Town Hall 2000 Smith Street North Providence, RI 02911 iii Town of North Providence Hazard Mitigation Plan- XX, 2015 Executive Summary This Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) is a product of the North Providence Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (NPHMPC). It has been approved by the North Providence Town Council, the Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. Its overview of past natural hazard occurrences verifies that the area is vulnerable to diverse events including winter storms and flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Florida Local Abundance of Quartz Sand
    28390_00_cover.qxd 1/16/09 4:03 PM Page 1 Summary of Content The geologic past of Florida is mostly out of sight with its maximum elevation at only ~105 m (in the panhandle) and much of south Florida is virtually flat. The surface of Florida is dominated by subtle shorelines from previous sea-level high-stands, karst-generated lakes, and small river drainage basins What we see are modern geologic (and biologic) environments, some that are world famous such as the Everglades, the coral reefs, and the beaches. But, where did all of this come from? Does Florida have a geologic history other than the usual mantra about having been “derived from the sea”? If so, what events of the geologic past converged to produce the Florida we see today? Toanswer these questions, this module has two objectives: (1) to provide a rapid transit through geologic time to describe the key events of Florida’s past emphasizing processes, and (2) to present the high-profile modern geologic features in Florida that have made the State a world-class destination for visitors. About the Author Albert C. Hine is the Associate Dean and Professor in the College of Marine Science at the University of South Florida. He earned his A.B. from Dartmouth College; M.S. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst; and Ph.D. from the University of South Carolina, Columbia—all in the geological sciences. Dr. Hine is a broadly-trained geological oceanographer who has addressed sedimentary geology and stratigraphy problems from the estuarine system out to the base of slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Spring Cemetery Tour Preservation Society of Pawtucket
    Mineral Spring Cemetery Tour Preservation Society of Pawtucket The village of Pawtucket, North Providence, RI was a small, but growing community in 1774 and at that time, the only burying place in the village was a small private lot owned by the Jenks family. Others had to be buried in Providence, or in the Newman cemetery in Rehoboth. There was an urgent need for a burying place in Pawtucket. Members of the Jenks family, on behalf of a Baptist sect called the antipaidobaptists, led the charge to establish a public cemetery in the village. They chose a spot just west of the village, known as Bagley’s Pine Woods. Despite the name, the land was in fact owned by Jonathan Jenks, Jr. Esq. (1746-1787)**, Gideon Jenks, Col. Eleazar Jenks (1747-1822), and Nathaniel Jenks (1749-1830).* Jonathan was a Justice of the RI Supreme Court and the grandson of Pawtucket founder Joseph Jenks through Judge William Jenks. Gideon, Eleazar, and Nathaniel were blacksmiths. Two acres of their land were deeded to the village. Half an acre was reserved as a location for a public meeting house, which was never built. In 1774, the Log Bridge Road cut through Jonathan Jenks’ land; the land for the cemetery was on the north side of the road. Eventually, the cemetery expanded and the road had to be moved. Log Bridge Road is now named Conant Street. Just inside the gate and behind the cemetery office is a memorial to Samuel Slater, containing the graves of his two wives, Hannah Wilkinson (1744-1812, daughter of Oziel Wilkinson and Lydia Smith) and Esther Parkinson (1778-1859), and his son Samuel, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Report on the Mineral Springs of Southern Rhodesia
    SOUTHERN RHODESIA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN / /I' No. 23. ' l · .. < /-:"··.,, \.<~--~, I -.,._(, \ . ! \;E}·, _./) "'- r '· ·- ~ ''-.,,~: I,·.;· :"- -,,' __,:.-/ A Preliminary Report oii,:tL'e Mineral Springs of Southern Rhodesia. By H. B. MAUFE, l\i A., F.G.S. lf'SUED BY AUTHOIUTY, CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction 7 Previous investigations 7 A list· of mineral springs in Southern Rhodesia and close to its borders 8 Distribution of the mineral springs 11 ~rheir relation to the geological structure 11 r:rhe origin of thermal sp.ringR 13 The depth of origin . 13 The Hature of the:> mineral spring waters 15 Southern Rhodesian mineral spring waters classified by composition 17 Analyses of some European and South African mineral w~n W Table of distribution of classes of mineml waters 22 Temperature of the thermal springs 22 Rate of flow 23 Deposits from the mineral springs 23 'l'he individual mlllc>nd spnngs 24 List of rcef<'rences 74 b~x % ILLUSTRATIONS. P,late I, A. The main jet at the Kabira OJ.' :0ongala Gushers, No. 3701, Sebungwe District ... FACING PAGJC 28 B. The maiJJ jet at the Chipiso Thennal Springs, No. 3601, Lornagnndi District 28 " Plate II, A. Chilambwa '.rhermal Springs, No. 4403, Makabuka District, Northern B,hodesia . 67 B. rrhe Blain eye at ~~~rhe llot Springs," No. 3102, in the Sabi valley, Mutambara Native Iteserve, Melsetter District 67 " Map of the Mineral Springs AT THE E~D A Preliminary Report on the Mineral Springs of Southern Rhodesia. IXTRODUC'l'ION . .Not much .interest has been taken up to the pre~cnt in the mineral spriugs of Southern Rhodesia, and certainly ver~ iii.tle use has heen made of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Biology 2004 1
    Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences 2003 Vol. 1(2): 37-42 Structure and Functioning of Microbial Community of Mineral Springs in Central Asia Namsaraev B.B.1, Barkhutova D.D. 1, Danilova E.V. 1, Dagurova O.P. 1, Namsaraev Z.B.2, Balzhiin Tsetseg3, Ayush Oyuntsetseg4 1Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan- Ude, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 3Institute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 4Faculty of Biology, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 210646, Mongolia, e-mail: oyun_a@ num.edu.mn Abstract The microbial mats of different types of springs in Central Asia (Zabaikalye and Mongolia) are described. The species diversity of mat-formed phototrophic bacteria was determined. The rates of microbial destruction processes (sulfate reduction and methane formation) were measured. An important role of bacteria and algae in the formation of mineral water composition was shown. Key words: bacterial processes, Central Asia, microbial mats, mineral springs Introduction kilometers of the deep kainozoii breaks. The origin of carbonated mineral springs is connected with Functional diversity of microbial communities carbonate and silicate rocks in zones of young depends on chemical composition of waters and volcanic activity. rocks. The electrons acceptor contents, biogenous Hydro-chemical and microbiological research elements and other substances influence microbial has been conducted in the mineral springs of diversity and microbial activity (Zavarzin, 1984). Zabaikalye and Mongolia (Barkhutova et al., 1998; At the same time microorganisms play an active Abidueva et al., 1999; Barkhutova et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Canals, Lakes, Ponds, Rivers And
    DEER PRAIRIE SLOUGH COSMIC MYAKKA MYAKKAHATCHEE CREEK WATERWAY RIVER D V L B TROPICAIRE BLVD D CREIGHTON R WATERWAY O F L A S N MYAKKA DEER PRAIRIE SLOUGH COSMIC AC-3 WATERWAY RIVER D N I75 V TION L A B I75 T L B B N A V I ¨¦§ S R L D ¨¦§ E P C T A M CREIGHTON Y D CEA D A U V AN B N S L P L V WATERWAY B V E D N L Y D R R B MYAKKAHATCHEE R LAGOON D E V D B WATERWAY L CREEK D N D R B V V A L L R E O B B C D F IN D N A A SNOVER L L R L R B A O SNOVER W WATERWAY E F BETHLEHEM B O S P L WATERWAY R D M D IC A WATERWAY E A V N E S L L B H L C V O B D N BLUE WATER WATERWAY T N N N E N SNOVER L Y DEER PRAIRIE SLOUGH NAL O LE BASS POINT WATERWAY NEW CASTLE WATERWAY WATERWAY G R MCAUGHEY R D E PRICE BLVD K COCOPLUM S LITTLEFIELD S P N R N WATERWAY H I O N E I WATERWAY G WATERWAY R H AV R CREIGHTON E D WARM MINERAL SPRING #1 WATERWAY E NEW LONDON WATERWAY S D T NEWMAN N V R BLUERIDGE D MYAKKA WARM MINERAL SPRING #3 L WATERWAY N D A B R D WATERWAY LAGOON I RIVER Z V AMNESTY V WARM MINERAL SPRING I L L R E T WATERWAY E R TRIONFO AVE B E WATERWAY WARM MINERAL SPRING #2 R B LV T R D R O D A COCOPLUM D V E D R L T W V B T L WATERWAY D MYAKKAHATCHEE M D D A N B TWIN LAKES WATERWAY E U V WARM MINERAL SPRINGS CREEK A V CREEK S L N D L IC B Y S BLUERIDGE B BETHLEHEM R S TAMIAMI TRL A R MCAUGHEY N E COCOPLUM I E C LAKE O A M D WATERWAY W S F WATERWAY L T I WATERWAY L D R A A V S B N BLUERIDGE LAKE A L L E E NEWMAN S B B B W E S N O S S M O R A Y O D I WATERWAY A H R T P SOUTH BLUERIDGE LAKE R D AV H V MATARO TALBOT JEFFERY H D E D R C E N S D E L V K V I T
    [Show full text]