DOCSLIB.ORG

SHA 2016: Washington, DC, January 6-9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SHA 2016: Washington, DC, January 6-9 This Issue 2.... President’s Corner 3.... Opinion and Debate 3.... Public Education & Interpretation Committee 4.... Images of the Past 5.... Current Research 6.... Continental Europe 7.... Great Britain & Ireland The material culture of migration to Europe - pp. 6-7. 9.... Latin America 10.. Underwater - Worldwide 12.. USA - Gulf States 16.. USA - Northeast 17.. USA - Pacific West 23.. Death Notice: Sarah T. Bridges 24.. SHA 2016 Preliminary Program 35.. Conference Registration Form 39.. Conference Student Volunteer Form The Williams Farmstead Project, Texas - pp. 12-16. SHA 2016: Washington, DC, January 6-9 2016 Conference Preliminary Program - pp. 24-34. Volume 48: Number 3 Fall 2015 Page 1 Published Quarterly Subscription is via membership in the President’s Corner Society for Historical Archaeology Charlie Ewen Newsletter Editor: Alasdair Brooks, DPhil A Call to Action 15 Reservoir Road Burton-Upon-Trent This coming conference will examine the past and future DE14 2BP of historical archaeology. The year 2016 will mark two United Kingdom significant anniversaries that are pivotal in the growth <amb [email protected]> and development of archaeology in general and historical archaeology in particular. One hundred years ago the Copy Editor: National Park Service was created. It is the lead governmental Daniel McNaughton agency for archaeology and an effective voice for the management and preservation of this nation’s heritage. A Images of the Past: half century later saw the passage of the National Historic Benjamin Pykles Preservation Act in 1966, a signal event for the profession. The NHPA, specifically Section 106 of this act, set the standards for the recognition of the significance of Current Research Coordinators: archaeological properties and laid the groundwork for the Africa: Kenneth Kelly cultural resource management industry. Fifty years later, Asia: Ruth Young 9 out of 10 archaeologists are involved in some aspect of Australasia & Antarctica: Sarah Hayes cultural resource management. I would dare say that the Canada-Atlantic: Amanda Crompton overwhelming majority of practicing archaeologists in the Canada-Arctic: vacant United States today have never known an archaeology that Canada-Ontario: Jeff Seibert wasn’t driven by these legal mandates. During the course of Canada-Prairie: Tim Panas Canada-Québec: Stéphane Noël my own career I have seen the shift from an SHA dominated Canada-West: Doug Ross by academics to one where the majority of its members are Caribbean/Bermuda: Frederick H. Smith employed running contracts. Our next president, Joe Joseph, Continental Europe: Natascha Mehler heads a CRM consulting firm. The once-perceived stigma of Great Britain & Ireland: Emma Dwyer being a contract archaeologist has long been erased. Latin America: Pedro Paulo Funari That’s what makes this upcoming conference so Middle East: Uzi Baram significant. To commemorate these anniversaries, the 2016 Underwater (Worldwide): Toni Carrell Society for Historical Archaeology Conference is being held USA-Alaska: Robin Mills in our nation’s capital. What better place to celebrate the USA-Central Plains: Jay Sturdevant USA-Gulf States: Kathleen H. Cande preservation and interpretation of archaeological resources USA-Mid-Atlantic: Ben Resnick important to the historical narrative of our historic past? Our USA-Midwest: Lynne L.M. Evans theme is a broad vision that encourages all our members to USA-Northeast: David Starbuck consider the impact of the NPS and NHPA on historical USA-Northern Plains & Mountain States: Steven G. Baker archaeology in the United States and around the world. USA-Pacific Northwest: Robert Cromwell It is important that we not only reflect on our past USA-Pacific West: Kimberly Wooten achievements, but heed the call to action to expand upon USA-Southeast: Gifford Waters our efforts and make them relevant to the general public, USA-Southwest: Michael R. Polk who foot the bill for these activities. We need to be able to demonstrate to an increasingly skeptical and regulation- weary public that what we do is worth their support. We Business Address: Society for Historical Archaeology, can start with the people’s representatives while we are in 13017 Wisteria Drive #395, Germantown, MD 20874, Phone: 301.972.9684, Fax: 866.285.3512, Email: <[email protected]> (New sub- their city. The SHA board is taking time out from our usual scriptions, change of address, subscription fulfillment matters) business meeting to visit our representatives on Capitol Hill. We hope to lure members of the Congress and the federal 2015 The Society for Historical Archaeology 3rd Class Postage regulators to our plenary session, the Public Day activities, Paid and even to listen to some of the papers. I encourage each of you to contact your representative, whether in person while The paper used in this publication meets the minimum require- you are in D.C. or by email, to inform them of what we do ments of the American National Stardards for Information and why it is important. Are you involved in an interesting Sciences--Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, project that has caught the public’s attention? Let them ANSIZ39.48-1984. know that, too. Volume 48: Number 3 Fall 2015 Page 2 It looks like we will have a record attendance with Xiang to give birth recently, so by the time you get here the 980 abstracts accepted, which should mean close to 2000 newest baby panda will be in his impossibly cute cub stage. attendees. So book your room early: the Omni Shoreham Check him out: <http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Animals/ Hotel has hosted presidents and world leaders—the Beatles GiantPandas/PandaUpdates/instagram.cfm>. even stayed there during their first trip to the United States. Come and see your friends, network with people who I have been there since and it has maintained its first-rate set might give you a job, cruise the book room and attend the of amenities. The hotel is located close to a Metro station that Thursday night reception (you’ll be surprised by the venue will take you to the city’s historic monuments and it is just a —I know I was!) couple of blocks from the National Zoo. I arranged for Mei See you in D.C.! Opinion and Debate Public Education and Interpretation Committee or materials of historical or archaeological value from land Artifact Amnesty: Forgive and Forget? owned or controlled by the state or on land owned by a water Adrianne Sams, M.A., RPA authority?” The survey goes on to ask: “Should it be illegal (University of West Florida Historic Trust) to remove these items? Would you support the amnesty <[email protected]> program? If you were in possession of said items would you return them?” and “Do you think others would participate?” Artifact amnesty has been attempted in several states, The multiple-choice answers consisted of yes or no, but a including Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah; few questions had multiple options. The question regarding however, this is a new concept for the State of Florida. whether or not the individual would return the artifacts had The Florida Division of Historical Resources (DHR) four different answers to choose from: has been tasked with preparing a feasibility study for implementing a one-time amnesty program of “limited • “Yes, if I had any, I would return them during an duration for persons who possess specimens, objects, or amnesty program.” materials of historical and archaeological value found on • “Yes, I currently possess items that I would return land owned or controlled by the state or on land owned by during an amnesty program.” a water authority” (<http://dos.myflorida.com/historical/ • “No, if I had any, I would not return them during an archaeology/artifact-amnesty-feasibility-study/>). The amnesty program.” Department of State, in consultation with the Florida Fish • “No, I currently possess items of historical or and Wildlife Conservation Commission, is preparing the archaeological value from land owned or controlled by study at the request of the Florida Legislature in the 2015– the state or on land owned by a water authority, but I 2016 General Appropriations Act. Florida’s Secretary of would not return them during an amnesty program.” State, Ken Detzner, encouraged full public participation in the feasibility study, composed of a short online survey with This survey question is gathering data not only on a comment period ending on September 4, 2015 (<http:// willingness to participate in the program, but also data on dos.myflorida.com/communications/press-releases/2015/ current possession of artifacts, if people are truthful. As a secretary-detzner-encourages-public-input-on-proposed- professional archaeologist, it was unnerving to not have a artifact-amnesty-program/>). fifth option of “Not applicable because I know it is illegal It appears that the amnesty program has not been to remove items from land owned or controlled by the developed in detail beyond the online survey. The state or on land owned by a water authority.” Professional “frequently asked questions” link does not address actual archaeologists have spoken out through various mass amnesty questions, but instead provides an overview of media platforms, including email distribution, social media, typical stewardship and outreach questions, such as, “How and blog posts. The Executive Director of the Florida Public does the state obtain artifacts? Can I dig for artifacts? Is Archaeology Network, Dr. William Lees, authored a blog it legal to collect arrowheads from my grandpa’s farm post regarding the amnesty program and its detrimental (family property, etc.)?” (<http://dos.myflorida.com/ effects on Florida’s cultural resources, <http://www. media/695305/faq_final-8-4-2015.pdf>). The lack of details flpublicarchaeology.org/blog/blog/2015/08/14/artifact- is commonplace for a preliminary phase; however, the five- amnesty-program-for-florida/>. Dr. Lees makes an question survey is dictating the practicality of a plan that excellent point in stating, “If we forgive those who obtained provides no details or guidelines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stone Tidal Weirs, Underwater Cultural Heritage Or Not? Akifumi
    Stone Tidal Weirs, Underwater Cultural Heritage or Not? Akifumi Iwabuchi Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 135-8533 Email: [email protected] Abstract The stone tidal weir is a kind of fish trap, made of numerous rocks or reef limestones, which extends along the shoreline on a colossal scale in semicircular, half-quadrilateral, or almost linear shape. At the flood tide these weirs are submerged beneath the sea, while they emerge into full view at the ebb. Using with nets or tridents, fishermen, inside the weirs at low tides, catch fish that fails to escape because of the stone walls. They could be observed in the Pacific or the Yap Islands, in the Indian Ocean or the east African coast, and in the Atlantic or Oleron and Ré Islands. The UNESCO’s 2001 Convention regards this weir as underwater cultural heritage, because it has been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, for at least 100 years; stone tidal weirs have been built in France since the 11th century and a historical record notes that one weir in the Ryukyu Islands was built in the 17th century. In Japan every weir is considered not to be buried cultural property or cultural heritage investigated by archaeologists, but to be folk cultural asset studied by anthropologists, according to its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties. Even now in many countries stone tidal weirs are continuously built or restored by locals. Owing to the contemporary trait, it is not easy to preserve them under the name of underwater cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Side Scan Sonar and the Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage Timmy Gambin
    259 CHAPTER 15 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OAR@UM Side Scan Sonar and the Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage Timmy Gambin Introduction Th is chapter deals with side scan sonar, not because I believe it is superior to other available technologies but rather because it is the tool that I have used in the context of a number of off shore surveys. It is therefore opportune to share an approach that I have developed and utilised in a number of projects around the Mediterranean. Th ese projects were conceptualised together with local partners that had a wealth of local experience in the countries of operation. Over time it became clear that before starting to plan a project it is always important to ask oneself the obvious question – but one that is oft en overlooked: “what is it that we are setting out to achieve”? All too oft en, researchers and scientists approach a potential research project with blinkers. Such an approach may prove to be a hindrance to cross-fertilisation of ideas as well as to inter-disciplinary cooperation. Th erefore, the aforementioned question should be followed up by a second query: “and who else can benefi t from this project?” Benefi ciaries may vary from individual researchers of the same fi eld such as archaeologists interested in other more clearly defi ned historic periods (World War II, Early Modern shipping etc) to other researchers who may be interested in specifi c studies (African amphora production for example).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
    OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf Author TRC Environmental Corporation Prepared under BOEM Contract M08PD00024 by TRC Environmental Corporation 4155 Shackleford Road Suite 225 Norcross, Georgia 30093 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region May 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and TRC Environmental Corporation. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endoresements or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report is available only in compact disc format from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, at a charge of $15.00, by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2012-008. The report may be downloaded from the BOEM website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future. Here are the addresses. You may also inspect copies at selected Federal Depository Libraries. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Technologies for Underwater Archaeology and Maritime Preservation
    Technologies for Underwater Archaeology and Maritime Preservation September 1987 NTIS order #PB88-142559 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies for Underwater Archaeol- ogy and Maritime Preservation— Background Paper, OTA-BP-E-37 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1987). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 87-619848 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form on the last page of this background paper) Foreword Exploration, trading, and other maritime activity along this Nation’s coast and through its inland waters have played crucial roles in the discovery, settlement, and develop- ment of the United States. The remnants of these activities include such varied cul- tural historic resources as Spanish, English, and American shipwrecks off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts; abandoned lighthouses; historic vessels like Maine-built coastal schooners, or Chesapeake Bay Skipjacks; and submerged prehistoric villages in the Gulf Coast. Together, this country’s maritime activities make up a substantial compo- nent of U.S. history. This background paper describes and assesses the role of technology in underwater archaeology and historic maritime preservation. As several underwater projects have recently demonstrated, advanced technology, often developed for other uses, plays an increasingly important role in the discovery and recovery of historic shipwrecks and their contents. For example, the U.S. Government this summer employed a powerful remotely operated vehicle to map and explore the U.S.S. Monitor, which lies on the bottom off Cape Hatteras. This is the same vehicle used to recover parts of the space shuttle Challenger from the ocean bottom in 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • + Conservation Considerations for Archaeology Collections. the Following Discussion Is Adapted from the SHA Standards and Guidel
    + Conservation Considerations for Archaeology Collections. The following discussion is adapted from the SHA Standards and Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Collections (1993) and the NPS Museum Handbook, Part I (1996). Archaeological objects “in situ” have generally reached a state of equilibrium with their environment. Although taphonomic processes, (what happens to an object or organic material after disposal or death), might have altered the object in some manner and erosion and weathering may continue to alter the object, many artifacts are recovered from stable environments. The excavation process disturbs this stability and recommences deterioration. A critical task for any archaeological project is to reestablish equilibrium before total destruction of the object occurs. Different materials, i.e. glass, metal, ceramics, stone, etc., are subject to different destructive forces and require different preventative measures. Therefore, as mentioned in Chapter 2, it is recommended that archaeologists consult with conservators before excavation begins. This allows the archaeologist to become conversant with the types of artifacts that may be encountered, the conditions in which they are found, and preliminary conservation measures. At any time, when difficulties are encountered in the field, consultation with conservators can help in the recovery process. This allows for retention of as much factual information about the artifact as possible (Bourque, et. al. 1980, Storch 1997). The Table below lists the most common archaeological materials with their associated problems and curatorial requirements. This list is not inclusive and provides guidelines only. The optimal temperature listed varies among the materials. MHS’s storage facilities are kept at 65°(+/- 3% in 24 hours) with 50% relative humidity (+/- 3%), providing an average suitable for most materials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Archaeological Resource
    The marine archaeological resource IFA Paper No. 4 Ian Oxley and David O’Regan IFA PAPER NO. 4 THE MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE Published by the Institute of Field Archaeologists SHES, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB ISBN 0 948393 18 1 Copyright © the authors (text), illustrations by permission © IFA (typography and design) Edited by Jenny Moore and Alison Taylor The authors Ian Oxley, formerly Deputy Director of the Archaeological Diving Unit, University of St Andrews, is researching the management of historic wreck sites at the Centre for Environmental Resource Management, Department of Civil and Offshore Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh. David O’Regan is a freelance archaeologist, formerly Project Manager for the Defence of Britain Project, Imperial War Museum. Acknowledgements A document attempting to summarise a subject area as wide as UK maritime archaeology inevitably involves the input of a large number of people. It is impossible to name them all and therefore any omissions are regretted but their support is gratefully acknowledged. Particular thanks go to Martin Dean, Mark Lawrence, Ben Ferrari, Antony Firth, Karen Gracie-Langrick, Mark Redknap and Kit Watson. General thanks go to the past and present staff members of the Archaeological Diving Unit and the Scottish Institute of Maritime Studies at the University of St Andrews, and officers and Council members of the IFA and its Maritime Affairs Special Interest Group. The IFA gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England, Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland, Historic Scotland, and the Environment and Heritage Service, Historic Buildings and Monuments, DoE(NI), for funding this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Privateering, Faye Kert
    Measuring Effects of Treasure Salvors on Spanish Colonial Shipwreck Sites By Melissa R. Price he treasure salvage of submerged archaeological sites has been a topic of continuous discussion T within the realm of maritime archaeology. In Florida especially, a culture of treasure salvage developed in the 1950s and became widespread, as much a result of SCUBA technology as of romanticized tales of sunken treasure. As more shipwrecks were discovered and exploited, the State of Florida was faced with a dilemma: how should these underwater resources be managed? In 1964, as Florida’s shipwreck salvage movement accelerated, the state hired its first underwater archaeologist to oversee exploration and salvage activities. Starting in 1967, the Division of Archives, History, and Records Management retained responsibility for protecting Florida’s cultural heritage, including its underwater heritage. State-owned properties and territorial waters (three nautical miles from the mean low water mark) could only be salvaged with a contract from the Division, with field agents overseeing salvage activities. The state initially instituted a contract system, with contracts being issued for either exploration or salvage purposes, thus giving rise to the Florida Exploration and Salvage Program (now Exploration and Recovery Program). Eventually, the contract system was replaced with a permitting system, and more stringent requirements were placed on commercial salvors. Students from the East Carolina University investigate the Pillar Dollar Wreck in Biscayne Bay. What could an academic investigation of the (Photo courtesy of Charles Lawson/NPS). treasure salvage industry and looting activities reveal continued on page 3 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Effects of Treasure Salvors ................................ 1 Two Oceans Aquarium ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Cultural and Historic Newsletter Monthly Compilation of Maritime Heritage News and Information from Around the World Volume 2.1, 2005 (January)1
    Marine Cultural and Historic Newsletter Monthly compilation of maritime heritage news and information from around the world Volume 2.1, 2005 (January)1 his newsletter is provided as a service by the All material contained within the newsletter is excerpted National Marine Protected Areas Center to share from the original source and is reprinted strictly for T information about marine cultural heritage and information purposes. The copyright holder or the historic resources from around the world. We also hope contributor retains ownership of the work. The to promote collaboration among individuals and Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and agencies for the preservation of cultural and historic Atmospheric Administration does not necessarily resources for future generations. endorse or promote the views or facts presented on these sites. The information included here has been compiled from many different sources, including on-line news sources, To receive the newsletter, send a message to federal agency personnel and web sites, and from [email protected] with “subscribe MCH cultural resource management and education newsletter” in the subject field. Similarly, to remove professionals. yourself from the list, send the subject “unsubscribe MCH newsletter”. Feel free to provide as much contact We have attempted to verify web addresses, but make information as you would like in the body of the no guarantee of accuracy. The links contained in each message so that we may update our records. newsletter have been verified on the date of issue. Federal Agencies National Park Service (Department of the Interior) National Register of Historic Places (courtesy of Erika Martin Seibert, Archaeologist at the National Register of Historic Places) The National Register of Historic Places listed the Portland Shipwreck and remains on the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Underwater Archaeological Organic Materials)
    UNIVERSIDADE AUTÓNOMA DE LISBOA LUIS DE CAMÕES Departamento de História Tese de Doutoramento em História Conservação de Materiais Orgânicos Arqueológicos Subaquáticos (Conservation of Underwater Archaeological Organic Materials) Tese apresentada para a obtenção do grau de Doutor em História Orientador: Adolfo Silveira Martins Co-orientador: Donny L. Hamilton Doutoranda: Andreia Ribeiro Romão Veliça Machado Junho, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work presented here would not have been possible without the help and collaboration of a group of people I would like to thank. To start with, the members of my committee, Prof. Adolfo Silveira Martins and Prof. Donny L. Hamilton. They kindly accepted me as their student and since then have been most supportive and helpful. Enough cannot be said about the help I received from Helen Dewolf, at the Conservation Research Laboratory, and also Dr. Wayne Smith. They were willing to teach me everything that they knew, get me any supplies and samples that I needed and they were always there to check my work and to guide me when needed. Deep gratitude is reserved for Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH / BD / 49007 / 2008), to Dr. Jorge Campos of the Câmara Municipal de Portimão , without whose interest in supporting me, this research would not have been accomplished. A thank you to Madalena Mira, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa Library Director, and to Doctors Mike Pendleton and Ann Ellis from the Microscopy & Imaging Center, at Texas A&M. Another word of appreciation to Dr. Adolfo Miguel Martins and Dr. João Coelho from DANS, for the enlightening conversations and help during the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Historical Shipwreck Figaro in the High Arctic Using Underwater Sensor-Carrying Robots
    remote sensing Article Mapping the Historical Shipwreck Figaro in the High Arctic Using Underwater Sensor-Carrying Robots Aksel Alstad Mogstad 1,* , Øyvind Ødegård 2,3,*, Stein Melvær Nornes 2 , Martin Ludvigsen 2,4, Geir Johnsen 1,4 , Asgeir J. Sørensen 2 and Jørgen Berge 1,4,5 1 Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondhjem Biological Station, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (G.J.); [email protected] (J.B.) 2 Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Otto Nielsens vei 10, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (S.M.N.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (A.J.S.) 3 Department of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Erling Skakkes gate 47b, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway 4 University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), P.O. Box 156, NO-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway 5 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty for Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.M.); [email protected] (Ø.Ø.); Tel.: +47-90-57-77-61 (A.A.M.) Received: 5 March 2020; Accepted: 18 March 2020; Published: 19 March 2020 Abstract: In 2007, a possible wreck site was discovered in Trygghamna, Isfjorden, Svalbard by the Norwegian Hydrographic Service. Using (1) a REMUS 100 autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) equipped with a sidescan sonar (SSS) and (2) a Seabotix LBV 200 mini-remotely operated vehicle (ROV) with a high-definition (HD) camera, the wreck was in 2015 identified as the Figaro: a floating whalery that sank in 1908.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Archaeology—Discovering and Exploring Shipwrecks
    Monitor National Marine Sanctuary: Maritime Archaeology—Discovering and Exploring Shipwrecks Educational Product Maritime Archaeology Educators Grades 6-12 Discovering and Exploring Shipwrecks http://monitor.noaa.gov Monitor National Marine Sanctuary: Maritime Archaeology—Discovering and Exploring Shipwrecks Acknowledgement This educator guide was developed by NOAA’s Monitor National Marine Sanctuary. This guide is in the public domain and cannot be used for commercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted for the reproduction, without alteration, of this guide on the condition its source is acknowledged. When reproducing this guide or any portion of it, please cite NOAA’s Monitor National Marine Sanctuary as the source, and provide the following URL for more information: http://monitor.noaa.gov/education. If you have any questions or need additional information, email [email protected]. Cover Photo: All photos were taken off North Carolina’s coast as maritime archaeologists surveyed World War II shipwrecks during NOAA’s Battle of the Atlantic Expeditions. Clockwise: E.M. Clark, Photo: Joseph Hoyt, NOAA; Dixie Arrow, Photo: Greg McFall, NOAA; Manuela, Photo: Joseph Hoyt, NOAA; Keshena, Photo: NOAA Inside Cover Photo: USS Monitor drawing, Courtesy Joe Hines http://monitor.noaa.gov Monitor National Marine Sanctuary: Maritime Archaeology—Discovering and Exploring Shipwrecks Monitor National Marine Sanctuary Maritime Archaeology—Discovering and exploring Shipwrecks _____________________________________________________________________ An Educator
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Shelf Archaeology : Where Next?
    This is a repository copy of Continental shelf archaeology : where next?. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/80061/ Version: Published Version Book Section: Bailey, Geoff orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-830X (2011) Continental shelf archaeology : where next? In: Benjamin, J., Bonsall, G., Pickard, K. and Fischer, A., (eds.) Submerged Prehistory. Oxbow , Oxford , pp. 311-331. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ An offprint from Submerged Prehistory Edited by Jonathan Benjamin Clive Bonsall Catriona Pickard Anders Fischer Oxbow Books 2011 ISBN 978-1-84217-418-0 is digital offprint belongs to the publishers, Oxbow Books, and it is their copyright. is content may not be published on the World Wide Web until April 2014 (three years from publication), unless the site is a limited access intranet (password protected) and may not be re-published without permission. If you have queries about this please contact the editorial department ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]