CDI Policy Papers on Political Governance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CDI Policy Papers on Political Governance centre for democratic institutions www.cdi.anu.edu.au CDI Policy Papers on Political Governance Political Parties and Post-Conflict Transition: the Results and Implications of the 2009 Parliamentary Elections in Aceh Ben Hillmani Executive Summaryii Since Indonesia's return to democracy, only national parties with a cross-regional organisational basis have been allowed to contest elections. Local political parties are restricted from contesting even local elections, making Indonesia unique in the world of multiparty democracies. Despite widespread antipathy to local political parties in Indonesia, the peace agreement between the Government of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) paved the way for parties representing exclusively local interests to contest provincial legislative elections in Aceh in April 2009. In a major test for Indonesia’s democratic political system, the local party representing the former rebels secured an impressive victory in those elections. CDI PPS 2010/01 PPS CDI Based on a province-wide survey of voters in Aceh and in-depth interviews with local and national party leaders, this study examines the Aceh Party victory and its implications for Jakarta-Aceh relations. The study finds that, while the introduction of local political parties in Aceh represents a milestone for peace The CDI Policy Paper and democracy in Aceh, new policies are needed if local political parties are to be series focuses on pressing issues of political securely integrated into Indonesia’s broader political party system. governance in the Asia- Pacific region. The series BACKGROUND – THE EMERGENCE OF LOCAL POLITICAL PARTIES IN ACEH publishes original papers commissioned by CDI, each of which deal with Since Indonesia’s return to multiparty democracy in 1999, only political parties important issues for with a nation-wide organisational basis have been allowed to contest elections. policymakers interested Under the revised Law on Political Parties (Law No 2/2008), a political party must in issues of democracy, governance and political maintain branches in 60 per cent of the country’s provinces as well as offices in at institutions. The papers least 50 per cent of districts and municipalities within those provinces.iii Revisions feature new research and to the law on political parties have made it increasingly tough for new parties to policy recommendations, and aim to forge research- enter the system. to-policy links and provide new insights and analysis Along with an accompanying parliamentary threshold of 2.5 per cent, the law is on subjects of concern designed to restrict the entry of smaller parties into parliament. These laws have to CDI. been motivated by concerns about fragmentation, but also by a historical fear of Political Parties and Post-Conflict Transition: the Results and Implications of the 2009 Parliamentary Elections in Aceh local political parties. Since the collapse of parliamentary democracy in the 1950s, 2 local parties have been associated with regionalism and disunity. In 1998, when the fall of the Suharto regime energised separatist movements at both ends of the archipelago, lawmakers were particularly determined to ensure that democratic reforms denied entry to local parties with regionally-specific electoral agendas. In addition to countering secessionism, promoting nationally-focussed parties was also seen as an important component of democratic development. As Benjamin Reilly has argued in the CDI-sponsored book Political Parties in Conflict-Prone Societies, building national-organised, policy-based parties remains a pre-eminent task for successful national government. Particularly in new democracies, broad- based national parties are “one of the primary channels for building accountable and responsive government”.iv Yet despite these goals, and the widespread antipathy toward local parties in post- Suharto Indonesia, policymakers were forced to revisit the issue in the context of peace negotiations between the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and Jakarta. Groups connected with the Free Aceh Movement had been fighting the Indonesian state since the 1970s, but a permanent peace looked possible in the first half of 2005. During peace talks brokered by former Finnish President Marti Ahtisari, GAM for the first time indicated a willingness to relinquish demands for independence in return for the right to participate in the governing of an autonomous Aceh. GAM representatives argued that they should be allowed to form a political party to facilitate their entry into the political system. While this idea was initially rejected by the Government of Indonesia, GAM was offering an irresistible prize—an end to the decades-long separatist movement in Indonesia’s westernmost province. Opposition to the local party idea was strong during the first rounds of negotiations. Former president Megawati Sukarnoputri argued publicly at the time that local parties were a threat to Indonesia’s national integrity. Citing local political parties in Spain and Canada as examples, Megawati argued that local political parties in Indonesia would also be vehicles for separatism.v Her stance was echoed by other prominent national leaders including former president Abdurrahman Wahid, former House Speakers Agung Laksono and Akbar Tanjung, as well as the head of Nahdlatul Ulama Hasyim Muzadi. Centre for Democratic According to a Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI) survey, 75.8 per cent of InstitutionsIndonesians also opposed the re-emergence of local political parties.vi A further 76.2Research per Schoolcent of Social Sciences were specifically opposed to local political parties in Aceh. AccordingAustralian to political National analyst Rizal Sukma, the survey results reflected public fears that localUniversity political parties would lead to national disintegration, concern that the governmentCanberra ACT had 0200 AUSTRALIA been too generous in its negotiations with GAM, and lingering suspicion that GAM remained committed to independence for Aceh.vii Other voices, however, pointed to increasing evidence that local political parties could serve as vehicles for conflict management and prevention. A number of human rights and other civil society groups supported the local political party Ben Hillman option. iiiiii Acehnese lawmaker and former Minister for Justice and Human Rights Hasballah M. Saad argued that it would be difficult to secure long-term peace if 3 former combatants were forced to join national parties. ivvvivii Because GAM had no linkages with national political parties, he argued that the right to form a local political party in Aceh was the only viable means of extending political rights to viii GAM and facilitating the former rebels’ stable entry into mainstream politics. Antipathy toward GAM’s demands for a local political party brought peace negotiations to the brink of collapse because GAM refused to budge on the issue. Eventually, recognising a historical opportunity to end the conflict in Aceh once and for all, Government of Indonesia negotiators led by Vice President Jusuf Kalla and backed by President Bambang Yudhyono conceded to GAM’s demands. In a major victory for GAM negotiators, the Memorandum of Understanding signed in Helsinki on 15 August 2005 promised to create “ the political legal conditions necessary for the establishment of local political parties in Aceh ”. ix THE LAW ON GOVERNING ACEH AND THE NEW LOCAL POLITICAL PARTIES Debates on the local party issue continued to simmer even after the signing of the Helsinki MoU. Jakarta-based opponents warned that local party issue was not a done deal, claiming that it remained a matter for the National Parliament to decide if and how Aceh might establish local political parties. After a series of heated debates, the House of Representatives (DPR) did eventually pass Aceh’s new autonomy law—the Law on Governing Aceh (UUPA), which replaced all previous laws on Aceh. Signed into effect on 1 August 2006, the UUPA contained two critical provisions—the right for independent candidates to contest elections for local heads of government (Pilkada) scheduled for 2006 and the right for Acehnese to form local political parties to contest general (parliamentary) elections at the provincial and district/municipality levels in 2009. x Independent candidates were allowed to contest the 2006 elections because it was clear that local political parties would not be established in time. The law restricted the participation of local political parties to provincial and district-level elections in Aceh. Local political parties were not permitted to field candidates in general elections for the DPR. However, in order to facilitate communication between local parties and the central government a dual membership clause was added. According to Article 83 of the UUPA, members of local parties were allowed to simultaneously join national parties. This law was followed by a more detailed set of (national) regulations in 2007 and provincial legislation in 2008. xi While as many as 14 groups initially registered as political parties with the Department of Law and Human Rights, the Aceh Independent Elections Commission (KIP) found that only six parties met eligibility criteria to field candidates in the 2009 general elections. xii The six parties were: In Political Parties and Post-Conflict Transition: the Results and Implications of the 2009 Parliamentary Elections in Aceh 1. The Aceh Party (Partai Aceh, PA) 4 2. Aceh Sovereignty Party (Partai Daulat Aceh, PDA) 3. Safe and Prosperous Aceh Party
Recommended publications
  • Indonesia Beyond Reformasi: Necessity and the “De-Centering” of Democracy
    INDONESIA BEYOND REFORMASI: NECESSITY AND THE “DE-CENTERING” OF DEMOCRACY Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen and Adhi Priamarizki* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: TRANSITIONAL POLITICS IN INDONESIA ......................................... 2 R II. NECESSITY MAKES STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: THE GLOBAL AND DOMESTIC CONTEXT FOR DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA .................... 7 R III. NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ................... 12 R A. What Necessity Inevitably Entailed: Changes to Defining Features of the New Order ............. 12 R 1. Military Reform: From Dual Function (Dwifungsi) to NKRI ......................... 13 R 2. Taming Golkar: From Hegemony to Political Party .......................................... 21 R 3. Decentralizing the Executive and Devolution to the Regions................................. 26 R 4. Necessary Changes and Beyond: A Reflection .31 R IV. NON NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ............. 32 R A. After Necessity: A Political Tug of War........... 32 R 1. The Evolution of Legislative Elections ........ 33 R 2. The Introduction of Direct Presidential Elections ...................................... 44 R a. The 2004 Direct Presidential Elections . 47 R b. The 2009 Direct Presidential Elections . 48 R 3. The Emergence of Direct Local Elections ..... 50 R V. 2014: A WATERSHED ............................... 55 R * Leonard C. Sebastian is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Indonesia Pro- gramme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of In- ternational Studies, Nanyang Technological University,
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERALISM, ETHNIC POLITICS and VIOLENT CONFLICT Molly
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: WHEN NATIONAL MINORITIES BECOME LOCAL MAJORITIES: FEDERALISM, ETHNIC POLITICS AND VIOLENT CONFLICT Molly Inman, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Johanna K. Birnir Department of Government and Politics What explains the variation in ethnic conflict in federal systems? Existing theory and empirical evidence are mixed, with some saying it decreases violence, and some saying increases it. This puzzle also leads to a number of research questions: why does federalism fail to resolve the problem of violent ethnic conflict? Why does local ethnic politics in federal units frequently lead to violence within the ethnic group? What effect does federalism have on violence between ethnic groups? Why do central governments intervene with force into local interethnic conflicts rather than simply allowing the local government of the federal unit to resolve the issue? Conversely, why does federalism sometimes work in preventing violent conflict and session in countries where ethnic politics is salient? The theory presented here asserts that the level of intraethnic political compe- tition within the national minority/local majority and the political incentives created by devolving power to the local level determine the answers. I develop a new theory of local ethnic outbidding by minority groups in federal systems which explains how local ethnic politics turns violent when intraethnic political competition is high. Previous theories have focused almost exclusively on national level politics and vi- olence and have largely ignored the subnational level. I also explain how central governments become involved in local ethnic conflicts in federal systems, because local minorities being targeted call upon them for assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Local Democracy Assessment in Indonesia (Sold Indonesia)
    State of Local Democracy Assessment in Indonesia (SoLD Indonesia) Editors: Abdul Gaffar Karim Hasrul Hanif Wigke Capri Arti Supported by: State of Local Democracy Assessment in Indonesia Copyright ©Penerbit Polgov, 2014 All rights reserved Printed I, October 2014 316 + xxviii pages, 16.5x24.5 cm ISBN 978-602-14532-7-8 Editors: Abdul Gaffar Karim, Hasrul Hanif, Wigke Capri Arti Layout and Cover: Oryza Irwanto Published by Polgov Press Polgov Press is published political and governance books, under the Research Centre for Politics and Government (Polgov), Department of Politics and Government Research Centre for Politics and Government is a research and publication unit of Department of Politics and Government (JPP) Fisipol Universitas Gadjah Mada. Polgov concerns on four keys issues; first local politics and regional autonomy, second party politics, electoral system, and parliament, third human rights and democracy, and four governance reforms and developing integrity system. Gedung BA 403 Jl. Sosio Yustisia No. 2, Yogyakarta, 55281 http://jpp.fisipol.ugm.ac.id Telp/Fax: (0274) 563362 ext.150 Surel: [email protected], [email protected] This report is a product of an assessment of the quality of democracy conducted on the basis of International IDEA's State of Local Democracy Assessment Framework. The report was developed by the Department of Politics and Government, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada with support and partnership of International IDEA. International IDEA has not participated in the content development nor the research leading to the report. Views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Update Issue 2, Oct/Nov 2008
    Election Update Issue 2, Oct/Nov 2008 The Multi-Choice Elections 2009 will be an important year for reformasi in Indonesia, which began in 1998 after the downfall of the dictatorial Suharto regime. On 9 April 2009, elections will be held for the Indonesian Parliament, the DPR (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, People’s Representative Assembly), the DPD (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Regional Representatives Council) and provincial assemblies. Three months later, the first round of direct elections will be held for the President and Vice-President. No fewer than 38 political parties will participate in the legislative elections. Just ten years ago, Indonesia emerged from what was in effect a one-party system. The bicameral system of Indonesian Parliament became increasingly powerless. governance is only five years old, following the creation of the DPD, first elected in 2004. The MPs were only allowed to rubber-stamp new DPD is composed of four representatives from laws. Serious discussions were seen as a each province, all non-party independents. It hindrance to authoritarian rule. has the right to make proposals and submit opinions on legislative matters and monitor the As is the case under the US presidential implementation of laws, but it does not yet system, members of the government are have the revising function of second chambers appointees of the President. In Indonesia, they in other countries such as the (unelected) are not directly answerable to parliament House of Lords in the UK or the US Senate. though they can be, and frequently are, There is growing unease about what some summoned to give an account of their policies lawyers and politicians regard as the and actions to parliamentary committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Moderation and Immoderation Among Islamic Political Parties
    Moderation and Immoderation among Islamic Political Parties Colm Fox Jeremy Menchik Assistant Professor of Political Science Assistant Professor School of Social Science Pardee School of Global Studies Singapore Management University Boston University This Version: June 12, 2019 Word count: 8,665 (includes all text, footnotes/endnotes, references, and tables/figures) Abstract: What factors cause parties to become more or less moderate is an important question in studies of Islam and politics. Existing research on moderation has been almost entirely qualitative, focusing on change over time at the national level, and has examined either moderation or immoderation rather than looking for evidence of both processes simultaneously. We coded the appeals contained on the campaign posters of 570 Indonesian candidates from Islamic political parties so as to map the conditions under which they made either moderate or immoderate appeals. We found that party ideology, demographics, urban-rural differences, and the level of government office (i.e., national or regional) affected candidate behavior. The study shows the effectiveness of a new data source and suggests new opportunities to study the conditions under which anti-system parties will either challenge democratic values or help to make democracy work. Keywords: Islam, political parties, democracy, moderation, election campaigns, election posters Acknowledgements: This article has benefited from feedback from Dodi Ambardi, Ulil Abshar Abdalla, Sunny Tanuwidjaja, Donald Emmerson, and workshop participants at the Freedom Institute, the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Jakarta, and the Shorenstein Asia Pacific Research Center at Stanford University. We received exceptional research assistance from Sugianto Tandra, Firman Witoelar, Kevin Fogg, and Dani Alfah.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Clearing an Airfield with Wooden Logs | Appointments As Chairman of the DPRD of Yapen-Waropen and As HPB for the Yapen-Waropen Area
    9 Clearing an airfi eld with wooden logs Florenz Imbiri It was by using only wooden logs to pound the earth firm and smooth that we managed to clear the airfield in Moanemani, Wisselmeren (pres- ent day Paniai). Without the aid of machines and heavy equipment, the work took eight months’ time to complete. All the adult residents of the villages around Moanemani, men and women, amounting to ap- proximately six thousand people, joined in to help. They were given their choice of payment: in money or in beads. Yet many of them preferred beads. ‘We prefer beads. Just pay us in beads’, is how they asked for their wages. A few members of the community were familiar with money, and they asked to be paid in money. Thus, in that way, they worked with pleasure. Aside from the airfield, we also worked on a whole network of roads from Moanemani to Obano, then from Waghete to Enarotali, again with the work done by villagers, digging and making roads that could eventually be used for vehicles. So, starting from 1959 they were acquainted with cars and airplanes. They were jubilant about the development and progress they achieved. Upon graduating from OSIBA in 1957 I took a stance and made the decision to work in the interior. I wanted to be together with communi- ties considered to be extremely underdeveloped at that time. I wanted to contribute the knowledge I had gained to the advancement of the people in the interior so that they too could enjoy progress. We were given time to select places to work.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Rule in Wajo, South Sulawesi
    ANDI FAISAL BAKTI Family rule in Wajo, South Sulawesi Introduction In this chapter I examine the position of aristocratic power holders in the district of Wajo, South Sulawesi, from the late New Order until the elections in 2004. In particular I address the following questions: 1. To what extent was administrative power embedded in aristocratic family rule in the late New Order? Which families were involved, and how did they exercise their rule? 2. What was the impact of Reformasi and regional autonomy in Wajo? What changes can be observed? 3. What was the effect of the elections in 2004 on the position of the aristocracy? 4. Finally, what kind of changes took place in the local power structure between the late New Order period and 2004? Christian Pelras (1976:314) analysed traditional authority in Wajo in the 1960s. He concluded that members of the aristocracy would remain in power, although in forms which differ from those of the past. Similarly Burhan Magenda (1989:891-2) emphasized with regard to South Sulawesi the surviv- al of the local aristocracy within the administrative apparatus (pamong praja). The fact that the pamong praja had become the bastion of local aristocrats is not surprising given the fact that the local bureaucracy had grown out of the dynastic bureaucracy of the ‘self-governing territories’ dating from the colo- nial period. The decentralization reforms of 1938 brought about the enlarge- ment of the dynastic bureaucracy, accommodating the fruits of expanded educational opportunities and a growing number of aristocrats (Burhan Magenda 1989:896). With respect to the Philippines, Benedict Anderson (1988) described a so-called ‘cacique democracy’, in which a well-entrenched oligarchy cooperates with a strong central state machine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Salafi Campaign in Aceh
    THE ANTI-SALAFI CAMPAIGN IN ACEH 6 October 2016 IPAC Report No. 32 CONTENTS I. Introduction .........................................................................................1 II. Background ..........................................................................................1 A. Salafism, Modernism and Traditionalism .................................2 B. 1950s-1990s: The Beginning .......................................................3 C. Late 1990s and 2000s: Fighting for Sunni Orthodoxy in Shari’a Legislation .........................................................................5 III. Targeting Salafis ...................................................................................6 A. The First GAM Elections .............................................................7 B. Attacks in Bireuen ........................................................................9 C. The Impact of the Irwandi-Nazar Rift .....................................11 D. More Pressure to Define Orthodoxy .......................................12 E. Lead-up to the MPU Fatwa .......................................................13 IV. Aswaja Parades and Their Aftermath .............................................15 A. Zaini’s Unfulfilled Promises to the Traditionalists .................15 B. Occupation of Baiturrahman and Concern over Saudi Influence ......................................................................................17 C. Muzakir’s Candidacy .................................................................18 D. More Violence
    [Show full text]
  • Golkar: the Embodiment of New Order That Still Appeals
    Golkar: The Embodiment of New Order that Still Appeals Ulla Fionna1 Department of Politics and International Relations, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University and Department of Government and International Relations, Faculty of Arts, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Abstract At the end of Suharto’s long authoritarian rule in 1998, few would throw their support for Golkar – the former government-backed party. Golkar (Golongan Karya or lit. functional group) changed its name to Partai Golkar (Golka r Party), but the stigma of being the former government’s main hand in controlling and manipulating elections has stuck on. However, against popular belief, the party has managed to continue its electoral success. This article explores the factors behind the continued popularity of Partai Golkar. Investigating its history, close connection with the military, and the changes the party had been undergoing since the start of the reform (reformasi) era, this article argues that the success of the party has been supported by the adoption of new image, the prevalence of money politics, and the strength of the party outside the main island of Java. Key words: Indonesian politics, Golkar Party, election, reformasi, party popularity Indonesia’s new order era (1966 -1998) is associated with rapid economic development, but also with Soeharto’s authoritarian rule, corruption, strong military rule, and extensive government control.i Pro-reform movement brought an end to new order in 1998 and strengthened anti-Soeharto sentiments. Golkar or golongan karya (literally means functional group), the new order government’s party, received the same negative reaction and was predicted to die soon after 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Politics and Local Political Parties in Indonesia
    This article was downloaded by: [Australian National University] On: 26 February 2013, At: 16:52 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Asian Ethnicity Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/caet20 Ethnic politics and local political parties in Indonesia Ben Hillman a a Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Australia Version of record first published: 13 Aug 2012. To cite this article: Ben Hillman (2012): Ethnic politics and local political parties in Indonesia, Asian Ethnicity, 13:4, 419-440 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2012.710078 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Asian Ethnicity Vol. 13, No. 4, September 2012, 419–440 Ethnic politics and local political parties in Indonesia Ben Hillman* Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Australia Since Indonesia’s return to multiparty democracy in 1999, national law makers have introduced regulations that effectively ban ethnic or regionally based political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations and Acronyms
    487 Abbreviations and acronyms ABK Fraksi Fraksi Amanat Bintang Keadilan – Mandate Star Justice Faction ABRI Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia – Indonesian Armed Forces ABSSBK Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah – Adat is founded on the syarak, the syarak is founded on the holy Koran AISS Aku ingin sehat sejahtera – I would like to be healthy and prosper- ous AMAN Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara – Nusanatara Indigenous Peoples Alliance AMMK Aliansi Masyarakat Melayu Kalbar – the Alliance of the Malay Community of West Kalimantan APBD Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah – the Regional Budget APBN Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Negara – the State Budget APDN Akademi Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri – Domestic Government Academy BAKIN Badan Koordinasi Intelijen Negara (currently BIN) – State Coordinating Intelligence Service BAKOR-P3L Badan Koordinasi Perjuangan Pembentukan Provinsi Luwu Coordinating Body for the Formation of Luwu Province Bappeda Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah – Regional Planning Board BIDA Batam Industrial Development Authority BIN Badan Intelijen Negara – National Intelligence Board BKO Bawah Kendali Operasi – Under Operational Control BKPM Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal – Investment Coordination Agency BKPPLR Badan Koordinasi Pembentukan Propinsi Luwu-Raya – Coordinat- ing Body for the Formation of Luwu Raya Province BKSAUA Badan Kerjasama Antar Umat Beragama – Organization for Inter- Faith Cooperation BOSOWA Bone-Soppeng-Wajo – The regionally powerful political and eco- nomic Bugis areas in South
    [Show full text]
  • The Institutional Origin of Multiethnic Politics in India, Indonesia, and South Africa
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2013 Parties and Peacebuilding: The Institutional Origin of Multiethnic Politics in India, Indonesia, and South Africa Geoffrey P. Macdonald University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Macdonald, Geoffrey P., "Parties and Peacebuilding: The Institutional Origin of Multiethnic Politics in India, Indonesia, and South Africa" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 865. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/865 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. PARTIES AND PEACEBUILDING: THE INSTITUTIONAL ORIGIN OF MULTIETHNIC POLITICS IN INDIA, INDONESIA, AND SOUTH AFRICA __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Geoffrey P. Macdonald November 2013 Advisor: Dr. Timothy Sisk ©Copyright by Geoffrey P. Macdonald 2013 All Rights Reserved Author: Geoffrey P. Macdonald Title: Parties and Peacebuilding: The Institutional Origin of Multiethnic Politics in India, Indonesia, and South Africa Advisor: Dr. Timothy Sisk Degree Date: November 2013 ABSTRACT Under what conditions to multiethnic parties win elections in deeply divided societies? To investigate this question, this dissertation examines the historical and institutional conditions that explain the formation and success of multiethnic parties in three ethnically divided, conflict-prone democracies: India, Indonesia, and South Africa.
    [Show full text]