DOCSLIB.ORG

Exhibit Q2 Avondale's Act 537 Plan (Book 2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exhibit Q2 Avondale's Act 537 Plan (Book 2) EXHIBIT Q2 AVONDALE'S ACT 537 PLAN (BOOK 2) ACT 537 PLAN BOROUGH OF AVONDALD CHESTER COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA SBWAGE FACILITIES PLAN FINAL DOCUMBNT MAY 1999 Revised APRIL 2000 rvith .Approval Correspondcncc from Chester County Plannin g Commission Chester County Hcalth Dcpartment, the Memorandum of Understanding rvith DEP regarding florys and tlre DEP Approval letter and Rela ted Correspondcn ce SSM File No. 5685-005 Copyright(2001)Spous, Stevens and McCoy, Inc. Prefacc Approval Correspondencc follorving thc April 2000 Submittal: Chcstcr County Planning Commission lctter of Junc 19,2000 - Chcstcr County Hcnlth Dcpartment letter of June 2712000 $'. :i " Mcmornndum of Understnnding dated Dccembcr 19, 2000 regarding Servage Florvs, ^ rvith Resolutions of Acceptance from Avondale llorough and New Garden Township DEP Approval of the Act 537 datcd March 9, 2001, and related correspondence. Ttr{E CT-,T]NTY GF CFlf,STER COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION Kare4, L. Martynick, Chairman Government Services Center, Suite 270 Colin A. Hanna 601 Wesuown Road Andrew E. Dinniman P.O.Box 214'7 West Chester, PA 19380-0990 6t0-344-6285 WILLIAM H. FULTON, AICP FAX: 610-344-6515 Executive Director June 19,2000 JU$l A:r Mr. Robert McCue, President 6'{ tr Avondale Borough Council P.O. Box 250 Avondale, PA 1931I 't ' i'-'x::l$ "" "s1' Re: Boroush of Avondale Act 537 Plan Dear rVlr. McCue: The Chester County Planning Commission has rerriewed the revised Draft 537 Plan dated April 2000. The revisions in this draft were in response to comments received by the Borough from the various reviewing agencies including the County Planning Commission to your initial submission of a draft Plan in February 1999. In our leffer of April 19, 1999, we raised two major issues regarding the initial draft: one, regarding the manner in which the estimated fuh.re capacity needs were determined; and two, the consideration of altemative disposal solutions "outside" the boundaries of the Borough. In reviewing of the document and the accompanying cover letter from Spotts, Stevens and McCoy, Inc., we aclcrowledge that those two issues have been considered and included in the revised Plan. We also aclanowledee that our several other more technical comments have been addressed, as well. We are pleased to see that there have been discussions befween Borough and London Grove Township officials regarding the possibility of sending some of the effluent from your lreafment facility to the Township's spray system if it is expanded in the future. We encourage you to continue this discussion. Should the Township and the Borough wish to pursue this approach, such a project would be eligible to apply to the Counfy for a grant to assist in the purcbase of land to be used for spray fields. Thank you for the opporfunity to revicw this rcvised draft Plan. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to call us. , Futtnn, AI{,f Director WHF/WWC/kp cc: Glenn Stinson, PADEP Ralph DeFazio, Chester CounFy Health Dept. Rebecca Brownbeck, Borough Council Secretary Thomas Srnith, P.E., Spotts, Stevens lnd McCoy, Inc. THE CUT]NTY OF Ctr1ESTER Karen L. Martynick, Chairman 601 Westtown Road, Suite 2gg Colii A. Hanna P.O.Box 2741 Andrew E. Dinniman West Chester, PA 19380-0990 FAX: 610-344-5934 SewageAVells 610-344-6526 Certified Food Manager 61C344-5938 Food/Insti tution 6 10-344-6689 Solid Waste Mgr./Recycling 610-344-5937 Laboratory 610-344-@39 Weights & Measures/Consumer Affairs 6 t0-34rt_6150 En gi neeri n g/Public Warer 610-344-6231 June 27, 2000 IvIr. Robert McCue s' Avondale Borough Cor.rnc il r$\3$ e Avondale, Pa. l93l I RE: Borough of Avondale Act 537 Plan Dear lvlr. McCue: The Chester County Health Department has reviewed the draft Act 537 Plan noted above. ffis draft is dated May 1999, revised April2000, by Spotts, Stevens and McCoy. This Department on April 20,2000 received a copy of this draft plan Essentially, this draft revision addressed the comments. from all'reviewing agencies after . submission of the original draft, The Chester County Health Department is satisfied with the response and has no objection to the approval of this version of the plan. Thank you for the opportunity to review this final draft. Environmental Health Superviso r CC: CCPC PADEP I Thomas R. Smith, P.E., Spotts, Stevens and McCoy/ File \ ORIGINAL RESOLUTTON NO. 00-12-03 (Non-Legislative) AVONDALE BOROUGH CH ESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOROUGH OF AVONDALE, GHESTER GOUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ACKNOWLEDGING AND ACCEPTING A PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO AVONDALE BOROUGH'S ACT 537 SEWAGE FACILITIES PLAN DATED MAY 1999 AND REVISED APRIL 2OOO. WHEREAS, Avondale Borough prepared and submitted to the Commonweatth of ; Pennsy|vaniaDepartmentofEnvironmenta|ProtectionanAct537SewageFaci|itiesP|andated u, May 1999, revised as of April 2000; and WHEREAS, after April 2000, additional flow data dealing with average and peaking flow factors to Avondale's Wastewater Treatment Plant became available to Avondale Borough; and WHEREAS, this additionaldata can supplement Figure V-1 following page 44 in Avondale I Borough's Act 537 Sewage Facilities Plan; and , WHEREAS, on December 5, 2000, representatives of Avondale Borough and the ! Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection met to discuss this additional data and, after such discussion, a "Memorandum of Understanding'was prepared by Thomas R. Smith, P.E. of Spotts, Stevens & McCoy, on behalf of Avondale Borough; and ClCorel\omco7\AVONOALF\ORClAcl537 ResDluliondoc WHEREAS, a copy of the afore-referenced 'Memorandum of Understanding" is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the ''Future Maximum Monthly Flow" as stated in that Memorandum is identified to be 650,000 gallons per day, and the "Future Annual Average Flow" as stated in that Memorandum of Understanding is stated to be 500,000 gallons per day; and WHEREAS, Avondale Borough deems it in its best interest to modify the Act 537 Plan which it has submitted to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection in accordance with the "Memorandum of Understanding" attached as Exhibit'A'. NOW,THEREFORE, this lgthdayof December2000 itis hereby RESOLVEDthatAvondale Borough, Chester County, Pennsylvania, accepts as a modification to its Act 537 Sewage Facilities Plan the "Memorandum of Understanding" attached to this Resolution as Exhibit ?", subject to the condition that the "Memorandum of Understanding" is also accepted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. BE lT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution, as certified by the Secretary of Avondale Borough shallbecome partof Avondale Borough'sAct 537 Plan dated May 1999, as revised April 2000, and as further amended by this Resolution. ADOPTED this 19'n dav of December 2000, ATTEST: AVONDALE BOROUGH COUNCIL BY; ANN C. BUSH, Avondale Borough Avondale Borouoh Council C iicr'rl',Olf ce7\qVOtJOAt FiOQi)1.4.,15:17 R.nDlLrli.n ($. ,RESOLUTION T{O. 5C{ WHEREAS, the Borough of Avondale prepared a Sewage Facilities Plan which incorporates substantial input from the Supervisors of New Garden Township regarding present and future flows originating in New Garden Township; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution Number 493 on June 12, 2000 endorsing the Sewage Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the Sewage Facilities Plan was officially submitted for review to the Department of Environmental Protection by letter dated June 28, 2000 prepared by SSM acting in its capacity as engineer for the Borough of Avondale; and WHEREAS, the Department of Environmental Protection has completed a preliminary review of the submission and has raised certain questions regarding the basis for computing present and future flows; and WJIEREAS, {ufr4g a meeting held on of Envirortmorttal F.iolection, the Borough ng flowswasdiscussed at length and an un WHEREAS, in concert with that understanding the flow analysis and computations were revisited and revised to reflect the approach decided upon at said meetingi and WHEREAS, the revised flow figures must be incorporated officially in the Sewage Facilities Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the B adopts as an amendment to the Sewage Facilities Plan I explanation contained in a MEMORANDUM OF UND by reference which sets forth among other things the facility as 500,000 gpd and the maximum monthly flow has been revised to include the cost of expanding the maximum monthly flow and said analysis is attached h is hereby adopted by the Board of Supervisors for inco This RESOLUTION shal I take effect immediately. Dated: January 9,2001 NEW GARDEN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORSI ley, Jr.. Norman S. Nunn I, Joan F. Kellcher, Secrctary of New Garden Townslrip, hcreby certify that the foregoing is a tnre and con'ect copy of RESOLUTION NLMBER ao5 adopted this 9th day oiJanuary, 2001 by Lhc Boirrd of Superv'isors of New Garden Townshin. A]"fES1': SEAL: F. Kelleher, Secretaty " MEMORANDUM OF IJNDERSTANDING BOROUGII OF AVONDALE ,., ACT 537 PLAN MAY 1999, REVISED APRIL 2OOO This memorandum is issued following a meeting with the Department of Environnrental Protection Water Management on December 5, 2000, where the average and peaking factors regarding flows to the treatment plant were discussed. Additional flow data has become available to supplenrent Figure V-1, following page 44 in the Act 537 Sewage Facilities Plan. That Figure recommended an expansion to 0.5 MGD, with continuing infiltration / inflow corrections to take care of peaking flows beyond 0,5 MCD. WASTEWATER FLOWS AT AVONDALE, AND THE TERMINOLOCY CONCERNING A PLANT EXPANSION IS TO BE CLARIFIED AND AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Flows under consideration in tlris memorandum are from January 1996 to September 2000. Please refer to the attachment for the flow rates for this period. The ratio of the average 3-month mariimum to annual average flow rate has been determined to be 1.3 as shown during the period 1997 and 1998.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toxicological Profile for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
    1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 161 9. REFERENCES ACGIH. 2005. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Adinolfi M. 1985. The development of the human blood-CSF-brain barrier. Dev Med Child Neurol 27:532-537. Adlercreutz H. 1995. Phytoestrogens: Epidemiology and a possible role in cancer protection. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 103(7):103-112. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1989. Decision guide for identifying substance- specific data needs related to toxicological profiles. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Division of Toxicology. Fed Regist 54(174):37618-37634. *Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1996. Toxicological profile query; list of all toxicological profiles. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxpro2.html. April 17, 2006. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1997. Toxicological profile for tetrachloroethylene (update). Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. PB98101181AS. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp18.html. July 15, 2006. AIChE. 1995. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane. C2H2Cl4. In: Physical and thermodynamic properties of pure chemicals. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Design Institute for Physical Property Data. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis. Altman PL, Dittmer DS. 1974. Biological handbooks: Biology data book. Vol. III. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1987-2008, 2041. Amaral OC, Olivella L, Grimalt JO, et al. 1994. Combined solvent extraction-purge and trap method for the determination of volatile organic compounds in sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Local Governments on Solid Waste Management. INSTITUTION Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C
    DOCUMENT Isms ND 092 346 SE 017 241 TITLE Guidelines for Local Governments on Solid Waste Management. INSTITUTION Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Solid Waste Management Office.; National Association of Counties, Washington, D.C. Research Foundation. REPORT NO PHS-2048; SW-17c PUB DATE 71 NOTE 196p.; An environmental protection publication in the solid waste management series AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 20402 (Stock No. 5502-0047, $1.50) EDRS PRICE MP-$0.75 HC-$9.00 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Administrator Guides; City Planning; *Ecology; *Guides; *Leaders Guides; Management Systems; Regional Planning; *Waste Disposal; Wastes IDENTIFIERS *Solid Waste Management ABSTRACT This document consists of ten guides on Solid Waste Management to assist local elected and appointed policy-making officials. They are entitled: Areavide Approaches; Legal Authority, Planning, Organization Design and Operation, Financing, Technical and Financial Assistance, Citizen Support, Personnel, and Action Plan and Bibliography. The guides were prepared by the National Association of Counties Research Foundation (NACORD). They are designed to present in clear, concise form information'to help local officials and interested citizens make dedisions on the planning, organization, financing, staffing, legal aspects, and operation of comprehensive areawide solid waste management systems. (JP) U S DEPARTMVO EDUCATION OF HEALtti. NATIONAL /WELFARE THIS NSTITUTE. OF DOCUMENTtOUCATiON DUCED HAS BEEN THE PEEXACTLY AS RSON OR REPRO ATING, IT RECEIVEDFROM POIN TSORGANIZATION Of STATED 00 VIEW ORORIGIN NOT OPINIONS SENT OFFICIAL NECESSARILY EDUCATION NATIONAL REPRE POSITION ORINSTITUTE OF POLICY guidelines for local governments on solid waste management this publication (SW-17c) was developed for the federal solid waste management program by the national association of counties research foundation under contract no.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Introducing Efficient Waste Water Treatment And
    THESIS INTRODUCING EFFICIENT WASTE WATER TREATMENT AND RE-USE TECHNIQUES IN NORTH CYPRUS by LUTFIYE GUNES 4055778 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture Anhalt University of Applied Sciences Bernburg, Germany 2014 1stAdvisor: Alexander Kader 2ndAdvisor: Johannes Cox INTRODUCING EFFICIENT WASTE WATER TREATMENT AND RE-USE TECHNIQUES IN NORTH CYPRUS Master Arbeit vorgelegt im Wintersemester 2013-2014 Master Thesis submitted during winter semester 2013-2014 An der Hochschule Anhalt At the Anhalt University of Applied Sciences Abteilung Landwirtschaft, Ökotrophologie und Landschaftsbau Department of Agriculture, Ecotrophology and Landscaping Studiengang Landschaftsarchitektur Study course Landscape Architecture Verfasserin: Author: Lütfiye Günes Bachelor of Architecture (BSc) Gutachter: Examiners: Erstgutachter: Prof.Dr.Alexander Kader 1st Examiner Zweitgutachter: Dipl.Ing- Johannes Cox 2nd Examiner February 2014 2 “A drop of water is worth more than a sack of gold to a thirsty man.” Anonymous “Do not waste water even if you were at a running stream.” Hz. Mohammed To my beloved unbeknown country… 3 i. Abstract Due to its geographical location Cyprus has semi-arid climate. This fact makes water more vital and vulnerable. For all of its time Cyprus has had a lack of and low quality water, if we count the yearly average rainfall ~ 500 mm. Rainwater coming from the Trodos mountains on the South side (largest mountain range of Cyprus-peak 1,952 meters), with the Besparmak mountain and Girne mountains on the North side, is collected in big tanks and distributed to the public. However for many years water has been supplemented to NC from Turkey with tanks and balloons.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: a Review
    resources Review Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: A Review Laurence Kavanagh * , Jerome Keohane, Guiomar Garcia Cabellos, Andrew Lloyd and John Cleary EnviroCORE, Department of Science and Health, Institute of Technology Carlow, Kilkenny, Road, Co., R93-V960 Carlow, Ireland; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (G.G.C.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (J.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 July 2018; Accepted: 11 September 2018; Published: 17 September 2018 Abstract: Lithium is a key component in green energy storage technologies and is rapidly becoming a metal of crucial importance to the European Union. The different industrial uses of lithium are discussed in this review along with a compilation of the locations of the main geological sources of lithium. An emphasis is placed on lithium’s use in lithium ion batteries and their use in the electric vehicle industry. The electric vehicle market is driving new demand for lithium resources. The expected scale-up in this sector will put pressure on current lithium supplies. The European Union has a burgeoning demand for lithium and is the second largest consumer of lithium resources. Currently, only 1–2% of worldwide lithium is produced in the European Union (Portugal). There are several lithium mineralisations scattered across Europe, the majority of which are currently undergoing mining feasibility studies. The increasing cost of lithium is driving a new global mining boom and should see many of Europe’s mineralisation’s becoming economic. The information given in this paper is a source of contextual information that can be used to support the European Union’s drive towards a low carbon economy and to develop the field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Fungi Biodegradation Environmental Microbiology
    The following chapter: Use of Fungi Biodegradation by J. W. BENNET, K. G. WUNCH, AND B. D. FAISON Has been taken from the book: Manual of Environmental Microbiology Second Edition Editor in Chief Christon J. Hurst ASM Press Washington, D.C. 2002. Useof Fungiin Biodeadation l. \7. BENNETI K. G.\yUNCH, AND B. D. FAISON 87 In nature, fungi do much of the dirty work. Th"y are par- Stramenopila, and four protist phyla. ln this classification, ticularly efficient at degrading the major plant polymers, the kingdom Fungi encompassesfour phyla: Chytridiomy- cellulose and lignin, but they also decomposea huge array cota, Zygomycota, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota (18, of other organic molecules including waxes, rubber, feath- 26). The Stramenopila encompassesthree phyia' Oomy- ers, insect cuticles, and animal flesh. Although industrial cota, Hyphochytriomycota, and Labyrinthulornycota. From microbiologists regularly hamess fungal metabolism for the perspectiveof researchon fungal degradation,most of brewing, baking, cheesepreparation, and for production of the speciesof interest are in the kingdom Fungi. antibiotics, commercial enzymes, and a number of com- In filamentous forms, the individual thread-like cells are modity chemicals, fungi are best known for their dirry called hyphae. A fungal colony, or porrion of a colony, work. They spoil our foods, blight our crops, rot our build- composed of many hyphae together is called a mycelium. ings, contaminate our petri dishes, and cause some rather The filamentous/mycelial growth form poses problems in loathsome diseases.Paradoxically, despite this notoriety, determining the sizeof a single organism and in measuring "thal- the use of fungi in bioremediation has been limited com- the growth of fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC Collection of Abbreviations
    I Nuclear Regulatory Commission c ElLc LI El LIL El, EEELIILE El ClV. El El, El1 ....... I -4 PI AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555-0001 2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. 0. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica- tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docu- ments and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference pro- ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro- chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula- tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service Include NUREG-series reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal articles, and transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Decontamina Tion and Waste Treatment Facility for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California
    DOE/EIS-O 133-D DRAFT ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT STATEMENT Decontamina tion and Waste Treatment Facility for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California JUNE 1988 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OOE/EIS-O 133-0 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California JUNE 1988 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DOE/EIS-0133-D COVER SHEET DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DECONTAM INATION AND WASTE TREATMENT FACIL ITY, LAWRENCE LIVERM ORE NATIONAL LABOPATORY, LIVERMORE, CALI FORNIA a) Lead Agency : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) b) Proposed Action: to construct and operate a Decontami nation and Waste Treatment Facil ity (DWTF ) for nonradioactive (hazardous and nonhazardous). mixed. and radioact ive wastes at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory . c) For additional co.pies or further information on this stat ement and pro­ gr am. please cont act : Mr. 1iJilliam Holman Envi ronmental Branch Environment. Safety and Quality As surance Division Department of Energy San Franci sco Operations Office 1333 Broadway Oakland . California 94612 Telephone : (415) 273-6370 For general information on DOE's Environment al Impact Stat ement (EIS ) process. please contact : Ms . Carol M. Borgstrom U.S. Department of Energy Office of NEPA Proj ect As sistance 1000 Independence Av enue. SW Washington. DC 20585 Telephone : (202) 586-4600 d) Designation: Draft EIS (DEIS) i DOE/E IS-0 133-D e) Ab stract This statement assesses the environmental impact s of alternatives proposed for the management of waste generated by the Lawrence Livermore Na tional Laboratory (LLNL) . The four primary waste management strategy alternatives that were initially evaluated are : 1) no action (i.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycling Works Volume 20, Number 1 Winter 2014
    Recycling Works Volume 20, Number 1 Winter 2014 A cooperative effort of the N.C. Department Job Growth in NC Recycling of Environment and Natural Resources and the N.C. Department Industry, Study Shows of Commerce. by Sherry Yarkosky, Recycling Business Development Specialist Private sector recycling jobs in North The total estimated annual payroll Carolina have increased by nearly 12 for North Carolina recycling busi- percent since 2010 as recycling busi- nesses is $442 million. nesses in the Tar Heel State continue Forty-five percent of recycling to grow and thrive, according to a businesses surveyed anticipate cre- study released by the N.C. Department ating more jobs during the next of Environment and Natural Re- two years. sources. Eighty-one recycling businesses The study’s major findings include: reported spending $79.6 million in equipment, facilities, and land in- There are more than 17,000 direct vestments from 2011 to 2013. private sector recycling-related jobs in North Carolina. Fifty-one percent of recycling busi- nesses surveyed plan on investing Private sector recycling jobs have $47.3 million in equipment, facili- increased by 11.95 percent since ties, or land in the next two years. 2010. Twenty-eight percent of businesses surveyed report manufacturing a product, using a combined 2,264,565 tons of recycled materi- als. (JOB GROWTH continued on page 2) Inside Recycling Works 2014 CRA Annual Conference..………………… 3 EarthStone Products Poised for Growth...….……4 Rain Water Solutions’ Recycled Content Barrel.......6 State Disposal Trends Down..……………………8 Results published since 1994 document consistent expansion in RBAC Says Farwell to Staffer…………………….9 recycling employment in North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Envi Ronm Ental Services Report
    ENVI RONM ENTAL SERVICES REPORT November 15,2012 Ponderosa Landfill . EAW update o Permit Update . CON update - Don Kyser retires . Cell Construction early 2013 o Public Service Building - time frame . Adjacent Property . New Haul Road . Jersey Barriers ¡ Annual Flyover/Annual Reporting ¡ Xcel Contract for Ash Placement Solid Waste/ Recycling . Recycling Operations Contract (WMl) o New State Rule under discussion: Concrete disposal o Solid Waste Management Plan r Waste Pharmaceuticals and Sharps r FullCircle Organics Household Hazardous Waste o Closed for Season . Off Season Activity r STS processing Miscellaneous . County Web Site o Credit Card Machine - and at Landfill . Web Portal Evaluation . Buffer Project NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING - January 17,2013 lnformation Articles Minnesota Pollution Control Solid Waste Plan Review Checklist Agency Mankato Free Press Single-sort in store of Mankato Mankato Free Press Briefs: 'Sharps' now accepted at Hy-Vee Lake CrystalTibune Convenient Disposal Options Available to Area Residents Mankato Free Press Callfor compost site review rejected Mankato Free Press Township agreements'operating very well' Waste and Recycling News Partnerships push progress of Coke's plant-based bottles Waste and Recycling News Facilities overwhelmed by piles of CRT glass Mankato Free Press Do Your Part: Top five solutions to recycling problems Post-Bulletin We all pay for illegaltrash disposal Star Tribune Ol' Man River is fullof life again Star Tribune Residential thirst straining, draining White Bear Lake Minnesota Pollution Control How's the water? Much better after 40 years of Clean Water Act Agency Minnesota Public Radio Businesses and boaters pinched by low river levels in Minnesota Star Tribune Sweeping cleanup of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Newsletter Spring 2011
    INSIDE THIS ISSUE “GREEN” ELECTRONICS DISPOSAL 2 LANDSCAPE LESSONS 6 RAIN BARREL/COMPOSTER SALE 7 EnvironmentalC nnections Spring 2011 CHISAGO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL NEWS Chisago County Household Hazardous Waste Facility celebrates 10 years of service! In the spring of 2000, construction of the permanent facility began on a moderately wooded site, removing very few of the oak trees that dotted the property. Trees that were removed were fashioned into paneling for the walls of the facility meeting room. The The staff of the Chisago County facility officially opened for business on Household Hazardous Waste November 27, 2000. Based on previ- Facility (HHWF) is excited to ous participation in the one-day collec- announce that the facility has turned tion events, staff assumed that the ten! During that time, they have taken first year of operation would bring in in over TWO MILLION POUNDS of 525 participants; however over 900 household hazardous waste from households were served, resulting in county residents, including unwanted 32 tons of safely disposed waste! In paints, cleaners, pesticides, aerosols, 2010, the tenth year of service, the batteries, fluorescent lights and more. facility served nearly 2000 households. Historically, these items were simply The household hazardous waste pro- tossed in the trash or just stored in a gram continues to improve to better garage or barn—primarily because no serve the needs of its customers and other option existed. Eventually, how- the environment. Recent changes ever, those substances, some of them include the addition of 5-gallon plastic extremely toxic, may find their way into bucket recycling. Central Converting our groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioelectrochemical Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Mature Leachate and Dairy Wastewater As Co-Substrates
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021) 28:24639–24649 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10167-7 WASTE AND BIOMASS MANAGEMENT & VALORIZATION Bioelectrochemical treatment of municipal solid waste landfill mature leachate and dairy wastewater as co-substrates Silvia Bolognesi1,2 & Daniele Cecconet1,3 & Arianna Callegari1 & Andrea G. Capodaglio1 Received: 16 April 2020 /Accepted: 16 July 2020 / Published online: 22 July 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Despite solid wastes’ landfill disposal limitation due to recent European legislation, landfill leachate disposal remains a signif- icant problem and will be for many years in the future, since its production may persist for years after a site’s closure. Among process technologies proposed for its treatment, microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can be effective, achieving both contaminant removal and simultaneous energy recovery. Start-up and operation of two dual-chamber MFCs with different electrodes’ structure, fed with mature municipal solid waste landfill leachate, are reported in this study. Influent (a mix of dairy wastewater and mature landfill leachate at varying proportions) was fed to the anodic chambers of the units, under different conditions. The maximum COD removal efficiency achieved was 84.9% at low leachate/dairy mix, and 66.3% with 7.6% coulombic efficiency (CE) at a leachate/dairy ratio of 20%. Operational issues and effects of cells’ architecture and electrode materials on systems’ performance are analyzed and discussed. Keywords Bioelectrochemical systems . Bioelectricity . Leachate treatment . Agrofood industry wastewater . Electrode materials Introduction possible spread of harmful pollutants (Capodaglio et al. 2016a). Municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal is a problem with no Leachate characteristics are quite variable, affected by easy or unique solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-FREAM Re-Thinking of Fashion in Research and Artist Collaborating Development Art for Urban Manufacturing Tech
    Re-FREAM Re-Thinking of Fashion in Research and Artist collaborating development Art for Urban Manufacturing Tech ToolboxRe-FREAM is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 825647. 1 2 PURPOSE This booklet syntetizes the results of the desktop research phase of the Re-FREAM project WP2 - Art transfer Further information about the project can be found on the project website www.re-fream.eu AUTHORS Floriana Benigno, Consorzio ARCA (Graphic Design) Marta Ferreira, IED Blanca Gomara, IED Luca Leonardi, Consorzio ARCA Margot Matesanz, IED Isabel Bertz, IED Fabio Maria Montagnino, Consorzio ARCA (Editor) STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This booklet contains original unpublished work except where clearly indicated otherwise. Acknowledgment of previously published material and of the work of others has been made through appropriate citation, quotation or both. COPYRIGHT This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, 2015-2016. DISCLAIMER All information included in this document is subject to change without notice. The authors make no warranty of any kind with regard to this document, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The authors shall not be held liable for errors contained herein or direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Re-FREAM is funded by the EU
    [Show full text]