DOCSLIB.ORG

Opioid Analgesics (Narcotic Anlagesics)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opioid Analgesics (Narcotic Anlagesics) http://www.gpatonline.com Pharmacology CNS: Opioid Analgesics Opioid Analgesics (Narcotic Anlagesics ) Analgsia : Unpleasant sensation evoked by external or internal noxious stimuli. Analgesics : The drugs that relives the pain by acting in the CNS or on Pheripheral pain mechanism. It divide into Opioid analgesics and non-opioid (NSAIDs) analgesics. Classification of Opiod analgesics present in papaver somniferum 1. Phenanthrene derivatives: Morphine (10%), Codeine (0.5%), Thebaine (0.2%) 2. Benzisoquinoline derivatives: Papavarine (1%), Noscapine (6%) (Narcotine) Demethylation of Codeine to Morphine Classification: 1. Narcotics agonist analgesics A. Phenanthrenes: Natural opium alkaloids: Morphine, Codeine Semi-synthetic derivatives: Morphine derivative: Hydroxymorphone, Oxymorphone Codeine Derivatives: Hydrocodone, Oxycodone B. Methadones: Methadone, Propoxyphene C. Morphinan : Levorphenol D. Phenyl piperidens (Meperidine): Pethidine, Fentanyl, Alfentanil, Sufentanil 2. Narcotic agonist-antagonist analgesics A. Phenanthrenes – Buprenorphine, Nalbuphine B. Morphinan – Butorphanol C. Benzomorphan – Phenazocine, Pentazocine 3. Narcotic antagonist: Naloxone, Naltraxone Tech Sanskar eLearning Solutions http://www.gpatonline.com Page 1 of 6 http://www.gpatonline.com Pharmacology CNS: Opioid Analgesics Opioid Receptors: Endogenous Partial Receptors Agonist Antagonist Substance agonist Buprenorphine Nalorphine µ receptors Endorphin Morphine Butorphanol Naltrexone Butorphanol Naltrexone κ receptors Dynorphin A, B Nalorphine --- Naloxone Pentazocine Morphine Naltrexone (Weak) δ receptors Enkephalins ---- (Weak) Naloxone (Weak) MOA of Opioids: Fig. 1 Action of Opioid Explanation of Fig. 1: Opioids excites neurons from periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) and nucleus reticularis paragigantocellularis (NRPG). which project to retroventral medulla which contain nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) 5-HT and enkephalin containing neurons Tech Sanskar eLearning Solutions http://www.gpatonline.com Page 2 of 6 http://www.gpatonline.com Pharmacology CNS: Opioid Analgesics runs towards dorsal horn and exert an inhibitory influence on transmission (Substance P). Opioids directly act on dorsal horn as well as peripheral terminal of nociceptive afferent neurons. Upon activations of opioids receptors (µ and δ) decreases c-AMP formation Opens K + channels hyperpolarisation Decrease in release of Substance P (neurotransmitter) On activation of κ receptors Suppresses N type Ca ++ ion channels inhibition of Ca ++ influx Hyperpolarisation. SAR of Morphine: Modification Interpretation rd Replacement of OCH 3 at 3 Position Codeine – decreased analgesic activity rd Replacement of OC 2H5 at 3 Position Ethylmorphine – little analgesic activty rd Replacement of -O-CO -CH 3 at 3 Position Heroin – increases analgesic but also and 6 th postion increases addiction effect. Dihydromorphinone or dihydrocodeine – 14-Hydroxy dihydromorphine – more potent Oxidation at C-6 analgesics. Tech Sanskar eLearning Solutions http://www.gpatonline.com Page 3 of 6 http://www.gpatonline.com Pharmacology CNS: Opioid Analgesics addition of OH at C-14 Bridging at C-6 and C-14 through ethylene Etorphine – 200 times more potent than linkage morphine Modification at tertiary nitrogen (N-R) Potent Antagonistic activity Replacement of R with methyl, n-phenyl, n- hexyl, allyl etcs. Thenaine, Oripavine Increased activity, selectivity, and decreased toxicity. Ethorphine 10000 time more potent than morphine but no. of side effects, use as a sedative in veterinary medicines. SAR of Meperidine Class: Removal of B,C, D rings Morphine Pethidine Modification Interpretation 4-phenyl group with hydrogen, alkyl, Reduces Activity aroalkyl or hetrocyclic group Replacement of –COOC 2H5 by –COC 2H5 Prodine - increases analgesic activity Replacement of N-CH 3 by various aralkyl e.g. Piminodine – Increased analgesic group activity Piperidine ring enlarge to 7 - membered e.g. Proheptazine – Active and potent azepine ring analgesic Methadone Class: Tech Sanskar eLearning Solutions http://www.gpatonline.com Page 4 of 6 http://www.gpatonline.com Pharmacology CNS: Opioid Analgesics Methadone series • Unlike mepridine series insertion of m -hydroxyl group in one of the phenyl ring of methadone series causes a marked decreased in activity. • Methadone is more potent than isomethadone Methadone Isomethadone • Replacement of propionyl group (COC 2H5) with hydrogen, hydroxyl, acetoloxy decreases in activity. • Replacement of propionyl group (COC 2H5) with amide group Racemoramide (More active than methadone) Racemoramide • Removal of any phenyl ring lead to decreases in activity. Morphinanes • Does not process C4 –C5 ether linkage. • N-Methyl Morphinan (20% of activity) • Levo form possesses greater activity , Levorphenol shows 5% more potent than morphine Tech Sanskar eLearning Solutions http://www.gpatonline.com Page 5 of 6 http://www.gpatonline.com Pharmacology CNS: Opioid Analgesics • dextro form of recemorphan is used as cough suppressant (Dextromorphan) Benzomorphan series: Compound R1 R2 R3 R4 Benzomorphan OH CH 3 H H Pentazocine OH CH 2CH=C(CH 3)2 CH 3 CH 3 Phenazocine OH CH 2-CH 2-C6H5 CH 3 CH 3 Metazocine OH CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 Cyclazocine OH CH 3 CH 3 • Trimethyl compounds is 3 time more potent than dimethyl amalogous • N-phenethyl derivatives possess 20 times greater potency than N -methyl analogous. • Pentazocine and cyclazocine are classic antagonist. (Pentazocine - High analgesia less addiction) Narcotic antagonist: Replacement of N-methyl group in morphine by larger alkyl group lowers activity and act as antagonist. antagonist activity increases in following order: C2H5 < C3H7 < CH 2CH=CH 2 < e.g. Nalorphine, Naloxone, Levallorphan Tech Sanskar eLearning Solutions http://www.gpatonline.com Page 6 of 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minnesota Statutes 1979 Supplement
    MINNESOTA STATUTES 1979 SUPPLEMENT 152.01 PROHIBITED DRUGS CHAPTER 152. PROHIBITED DRUGS Sec. 152.01 Definitions. 152.02 Schedules of controlled substances; admin­ istration of chapter. 152.01 Definitions. [For text of subds 1 to 8, see M.S.1978] Subd. 9. Marijuana. "Marijuana" means all parts of the plant of any species of the genus Cannabis, including all agronomical varieties, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin, but shall not include the mature stalks of such plant, fiber from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mix­ ture, or preparation of such mature stalks, except the resin extracted therefrom, fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination. [For text of subds 10 to 17, see M.S.1978] [ 1979 c 157 s 1 ] 152.02 Schedules of controlled substances; administration of chapter. [For text of subd 1, see M.S.1978) Subd. 2. The following items are listed in Schedule I: (1) Any of the following substances, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, unless specifically excepted, whenever the exis­ tence of such isomers, esters, ethers and salts is possible within the specific chemical des­ ignation: Acetylmethadol; Allylprodine; Alphacetylmethadol; Alphameprodine; Alpham- ethadol; Benzethidine; Betacetylmethadol; Betameprodine; Betamethadol; Betaprodine; Clonitazene; Dextromoramide; Dextrorphan; Diampromide; Diethyliambutene; Dime- noxadol; Dimepheptanol; Dimethyliambutene; Dioxaphetyl butyrate; Dipipanone; Ethylmethylthiambutene; Etonitazene; Etoxeridine; Furethidine; Hydroxypethidine; Ke- tobemidone; Levomoramide; Levophenacylmorphan; Morpheridine; Noracymethadol; Norlevorphanol; Normethadone; Norpipanone; Phenadoxone; Phenampromide; Pheno- morphan; Phenoperidine; Piritramide; Proheptazine; Properidine; Racemoramide; Tri­ meperidine.
    [Show full text]
  • Noscapine Suppresses Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors-Induced Cough
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKNEPNephrology1320-53582005 Asian Pacific Society of NephrologyAugust 2005104348350Original ArticleNoscapine suppresses ACEI-induced coughA Mooraki et al. NEPHROLOGY 2005; 10, 348–350 doi:10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00429.x Original Article Noscapine suppresses angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors-induced cough AHMAD MOORAKI,1 ARIA JENABI,1 MOSADEGH JABBARI,1 MOHAMMAD I ZOLFAGHARI,2 SAHAR Z JAVANMARDI,2 MASOUD MAHMOUDIAN3 and BAHAR BASTANI4 1Division of Nephrology, Rasool Akram Medical Center and 3Razi Institute for Drug Research, Iran University of Medical Sciences and 2Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Azad University, Iran and 4Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA SUMMARY: Background: Dry cough is a common side-effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and is a major limiting factor of their use. It has been suggested that ACEI cause this side-effect by potentiation of the bradykinin effect. Previous work in our laboratory has shown that noscapine, an antitussive drug, inhibits the effect of bradykinin. Methods: To investigate the effect of noscapine on ACEI-induced cough, 611 hypertensive patients who were being treated with ACEI were evaluated for the incidence of persistent dry cough. Results: A cough had developed in 65 (10.6%) patients, two (3.1%) of whom also had severe respiratory dis- tress that required hospitalisation and immediate discontinuation of the ACEI. Forty-two (64.6%) patients had developed a mild cough and 21 (32.3%) patients had developed a moderate to severe cough. The patients with moderate to severe cough received 15 mg of noscapine, orally three times daily, while they continued ACEI.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE BILL No. 52
    As Amended by Senate Committee Session of 2017 SENATE BILL No. 52 By Committee on Public Health and Welfare 1-20 1 AN ACT concerning the uniform controlled substances act; relating to 2 substances included in schedules I, II and V; amending K.S.A. 2016 3 Supp. 65-4105, 65-4107 and 65-4113 and repealing the existing 4 sections. 5 6 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: 7 Section 1. K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 65-4105 is hereby amended to read as 8 follows: 65-4105. (a) The controlled substances listed in this section are 9 included in schedule I and the number set forth opposite each drug or 10 substance is the DEA controlled substances code which has been assigned 11 to it. 12 (b) Any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, 13 ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters and ethers, unless specifically 14 excepted, whenever the existence of these isomers, esters, ethers and salts 15 is possible within the specific chemical designation: 16 (1) Acetyl fentanyl (N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)- 17 N-phenylacetamide)......................................................................9821 18 (2) Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl (N-[1-(1-methyl-2-phenethyl)-4- 19 piperidinyl]-N-phenylacetamide)..................................................9815 20 (3) Acetylmethadol.............................................................................9601 21 (4) AH-7921 (3.4-dichloro-N-[(1- 22 dimethylaminocyclohexylmethyl]benzamide)...............................9551 23 (4)(5) Allylprodine...........................................................................9602
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20050181041A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0181041 A1 Goldman (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 18, 2005 (54) METHOD OF PREPARATION OF MIXED Related US. Application Data PHASE CO-CRYSTALS WITH ACTIVE AGENTS (60) Provisional application No. 60/528,232, ?led on Dec. 9, 2003. Provisional application No. 60/559,862, ?led (75) Inventor: David Goldman, Portland, CT (US) on Apr. 6, 2004. Correspondence Address: Publication Classi?cation LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD (51) Int. Cl.7 ....................... .. A61K 31/56; A61K 38/00; TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, SUITE 4900 A61K 9/64 180 NORTH STETSON AVENUE (52) US. Cl. ............................ .. 424/456; 514/179; 514/2; CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780 (US) 514/221 (73) Assignee: MedCrystalForms, LLC, Hunt Valley, (57) ABSTRACT MD This invention pertains to a method of preparing mixed phase co-crystals of active agents With one or more materials (21) Appl. No.: 11/008,034 that alloWs the modi?cation of the active agent to a neW physical/crystal form With unique properties useful for the delivery of the active agent, as Well as compositions com (22) Filed: Dec. 9, 2004 prising the mixed phase co-crystals. Patent Application Publication Aug. 18, 2005 Sheet 1 0f 8 US 2005/0181041 A1 FIG. 1a 214.70°C z.m."m.n... 206.98°C n..0ao 142 OJ/g as:20m=3: -0.8 -1.0 40 90 1:10 2110 Temperture (°C) FIG. 1b 0.01 as:22“.Km: 217 095 24221.4 39Jmum/Q -0.8 35 155 255 255 Temperture (°C) Patent Application Publication Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Controlled Substances Checklist
    Federal Controlled Substances Checklist Introduction By Norton Tooby & Joseph Justin Rollin We have reprinted here an alphabetical list of all controlled substances forbidden under federal drug laws, taken from the official website of the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, at http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html. No copyright is asserted to this information. This list changes frequently. The official list is contained at 21 CFR § 1308, as supplemented by final rules published in the Federal Register. The attached checklist of controlled substances has been compiled into one list, and placed in alphabetical order, for ease of reference. If a controlled substance is listed in the federal drug schedules, it triggers deportation, INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), and inadmissibility. INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)II). In addition, there is an aggravated felony defined as illicit trafficking in a controlled substance. INA § 101(a)(43)(B), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). The same controlled substance lists apply to this ground of deportation as well. If a drug is not listed on the federal controlled substances schedules, it does not trigger removal under these grounds. In addition, because the government has the burden of proof in deportation removal proceedings by clear and convincing evidence, if the record of conviction is ambiguous as to whether the specific substance involved in the particular case was listed on the federal schedules, the government cannot obtain a deportation removal order on this ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens
    Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2017 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/53 Original language: English © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr. Barry Logan, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, at the Fredric Rieders Family Founda- tion and NMS Labs, United States; Amanda L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures and CDS for Safer Opioid Prescribing: a Literature Review
    Measures and CDS for Safer Opioid Prescribing: A Literature Review Measures and CDS for Safer Opioid Prescribing: A Literature Review Executive Summary The U.S. opioid epidemic continues to pose significant challenges for patients, families, clinicians, and public health policy. Opioids are responsible for an estimated 315,000 deaths (from 1999 to 2016) and have caused 115 deaths per day.1 In 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services declared the opioid epidemic a public health crisis.2 The total economic burden of opioid abuse in the United States has been estimated to be $78.5 billion per year.3 Although providing care for chronic opioid users is important, equally vital are efforts to prevent so-called opioid-naïve patients (patients with no history of opioid use) from developing regular opioid use, misuse, or abuse. However, much remains unclear regarding what role clinician prescribing habits play and what duration or dose of opioids may safely be prescribed without promoting long-term use.4,5 In 2013, ECRI Institute convened the Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety, and its component, single-topic-focused workgroups followed. For this subject, the Electronic Health Record Association (EHRA): Measures and Clinical Decision Support (CDS) for Safer Opioid Prescribing workgroup included members from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) EHRA and the Partnership team. The project was oriented towards exploring methods to enable a synergistic cycle of performance measurement and identifying electronic health record (EHR)/health information technology (IT)–enabled approaches to support healthcare organizations’ ability to assess and measure opioid prescribing.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    INDEX Volume 21 3, April-June 1980 Aarbakke, J., see Gadeholt, G., tyl xanthine (MIX) on am- Anderson, D. F., Phernetton, T. muscle (dog), 150 196 phibian neuromyal transmis- M. and Rankin, J. H. G.: The Atria, positive isotropic action of Abboa-Offei, B. E., see Casey, F. sion, 586 measurement of placental digoxigenin, effects of sodium B., 432 Akera, T., see Yamamoto, S., 105 drug clearance in near-term (guinea pigs), 105 Acetaldehyde, effects on testicu- Alcohol sheep: Indomethacin, 100 Auber, M., see HalUshka, P. V., tar steroidogenesis (rats), 228 depression of myo-inositol 1- Anesthetics, local, frequency-de- 462 Acetaminophen phosphate in cerebral cortex pendent sodium channel Ayachi, S. and Brown, A. M.: Hy- probe analysis, hepatic gluts- (rat), 24 block in nerve (frog), 114 potensive effects of cardiac thione turnover in vivo deter- tolerance to (mice), 309 Angiotensin, comparison with ox- glycosides in spontaneously mined by (rats), 54 [‘4C]Allantoin, renal clearance ytocin in effect on prosta- hypertensive rats, 520 toxicity in lymphocytes in vitro (rabbit), 168 glandin release in IsOlated (man), 395 Allen, J. C., see Seidel, C. L., 514 uterus (rat), 575 Bainbridge, C. W. and Heistad, D. Acetazolamide Allergy, antiallergic properties of Anileridine, effects on body tem- D.: Effect of haloperidol on inhibition of bone resorption, SQ 13,847 and SQ 12,903 perature (mice), 273 ventilatory responses to do- lack of hypophosphateania (rats, mice, guinea pigs), 432, Anoxia, -induced contractions of pamine in man, 13 (rats), 441 437 coronary arteries, inhibition Barbitol, enhancement of effects inhibition of carbonic ashy- Allison, J. H. and Cicero, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration and Affinity Labeling of a Stereoselective Binding Site for A
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 82, pp. 940-944, February 1985 Neurobiology Demonstration and affinity labeling of a stereoselective binding site for a benzomorphan opiate on acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes from Torpedo electroplaque (cholinergic receptor/ion channel/photoaffinity labeling/N-aliyl-N-normetazocine/phencyclidine) ROBERT E. OSWALD, NANCY N. PENNOW, AND JAMES T. MCLAUGHLIN Department of Pharmacology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Communicated by R. H. Wasserman, October 3, 1984 ABSTRACT The interaction of an optically pure benzo- Benzomorphan opiates have been shown to inhibit the morphan opiate, (-)-N-allyl-N-normetazocine [(-)-ANMC], binding of [3H]PCP to central nervous system synaptic mem- with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo electro- branes (15, 16) and to modify the activity of serum cholines plaque was studied by using radioligand binding and affinity terase (17). Some opiate derivatives, in particular the benzo- labeling. The binding was complex with at least two specific morphans, can inhibit the binding of [3H]perhydrohistrioni- components having equilibrium dissociation constants of 0.3 cotoxin and [3H]PCP to the Torpedo AcChoR (18, 19). In the jiM and 2 jiM. The affinity of the higher affinity component present studies, a radioactive optically pure benzomorphan, was decreased by carbamoylcholine but not by a-bungaro- (-)-[3H]N-allyl-N-normetazocine {(-)-[3H]ANMC}, was toxin. The effect of carbamoylcholine was not blocked by a- used to measure reversible binding to and affinity labeling of bungarotoxin. In comparison, the affinity of [3Hlphencycli- the Torpedo electroplaque AcChoR. Specific binding was dine, a well-characterized ligand for a high-affinity site for shown to be complex with at least one component having noncompetitive blockers on the acetylcholine receptor, is in- lower affinity in the presence rather than the absence of cho- creased by carbamoylcholine and the increase is blocked by a- linergic effectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs of Abuseon September Archived 13-10048 No
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION WWW.DEA.GOV 9, 2014 on September archived 13-10048 No. v. Stewart, in U.S. cited Drugs of2011 Abuse EDITION A DEA RESOURCE GUIDE V. Narcotics WHAT ARE NARCOTICS? Also known as “opioids,” the term "narcotic" comes from the Greek word for “stupor” and originally referred to a variety of substances that dulled the senses and relieved pain. Though some people still refer to all drugs as “narcot- ics,” today “narcotic” refers to opium, opium derivatives, and their semi-synthetic substitutes. A more current term for these drugs, with less uncertainty regarding its meaning, is “opioid.” Examples include the illicit drug heroin and pharmaceutical drugs like OxyContin®, Vicodin®, codeine, morphine, methadone and fentanyl. WHAT IS THEIR ORIGIN? The poppy papaver somniferum is the source for all natural opioids, whereas synthetic opioids are made entirely in a lab and include meperidine, fentanyl, and methadone. Semi-synthetic opioids are synthesized from naturally occurring opium products, such as morphine and codeine, and include heroin, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and hydromorphone. Teens can obtain narcotics from friends, family members, medicine cabinets, pharmacies, nursing 2014 homes, hospitals, hospices, doctors, and the Internet. 9, on September archived 13-10048 No. v. Stewart, in U.S. cited What are common street names? Street names for various narcotics/opioids include: ➔ Hillbilly Heroin, Lean or Purple Drank, OC, Ox, Oxy, Oxycotton, Sippin Syrup What are their forms? Narcotics/opioids come in various forms including: ➔ T ablets, capsules, skin patches, powder, chunks in varying colors (from white to shades of brown and black), liquid form for oral use and injection, syrups, suppositories, lollipops How are they abused? ➔ Narcotics/opioids can be swallowed, smoked, sniffed, or injected.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Drug Schedules, Violations & Penalties
    CONTROLLED DRUG SCHEDULES, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES A REFERENCE FOR THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY April 2015 Prepared by the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION Drug Control Division TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I CONTROLLED DRUG SCHEDULES & VIOLATIONS An alphabetical listing of controlled drugs by their brand, generic and/or street name that includes each drug’s schedule and the violation(s) from the Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) that are associated with each drug’s sale and/or possession. SECTION II CONTROLLED DRUG VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES A numerical listing of controlled drug violations by their section number in the Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) and the penalty(ies) associated with each violation. SECTION III SUMMARY OF FEDERAL METHAMPHETAMINE STATUTES 2 S E C T I O N I CONTROLLED DRUG SCHEDULES & VIOLATIONS The ‘Schedules of Controlled Substances’ may be found in Sections 21a-243-7 through 21a-243-11, inclusive, of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. www.ct.gov/dcp/lib/dcp/dcp_regulations/21a-243_designation_of_controlled_drugs.pdf 3 Drug State CS Drug Type AKA Sale or Quantity Person Drug- CGS Schedule Possession? Dependent or Not Violation APAP = Acetaminophen APAP = Acetaminophen Drug-Dependent ? ASA = Aspirin ASA = Aspirin “2C-C” Designer Drug - Stimulant “Bath Salts” Federal CS Schedule 1 “2C-D” Designer Drug - Stimulant “Bath Salts” Federal CS Schedule 1 “2C-E” Designer Drug - Stimulant “Bath Salts” Federal CS Schedule 1 “2C-H” Designer Drug - Stimulant “Bath Salts” Federal CS Schedule 1 “2C-I” Designer Drug - Stimulant
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement of the Sigma-1 Receptor in Methamphetamine-Mediated Changes to Astrocyte Structure and Function" (2020)
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Medical Sciences Medical Sciences 2020 Involvement of the Sigma-1 Receptor in Methamphetamine- Mediated Changes to Astrocyte Structure and Function Richik Neogi University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-8812 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2020.363 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Neogi, Richik, "Involvement of the Sigma-1 Receptor in Methamphetamine-Mediated Changes to Astrocyte Structure and Function" (2020). Theses and Dissertations--Medical Sciences. 12. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/medsci_etds/12 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Medical Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Medical Sciences by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]