SENATE BILL No. 52

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SENATE BILL No. 52 As Amended by Senate Committee Session of 2017 SENATE BILL No. 52 By Committee on Public Health and Welfare 1-20 1 AN ACT concerning the uniform controlled substances act; relating to 2 substances included in schedules I, II and V; amending K.S.A. 2016 3 Supp. 65-4105, 65-4107 and 65-4113 and repealing the existing 4 sections. 5 6 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: 7 Section 1. K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 65-4105 is hereby amended to read as 8 follows: 65-4105. (a) The controlled substances listed in this section are 9 included in schedule I and the number set forth opposite each drug or 10 substance is the DEA controlled substances code which has been assigned 11 to it. 12 (b) Any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, 13 ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters and ethers, unless specifically 14 excepted, whenever the existence of these isomers, esters, ethers and salts 15 is possible within the specific chemical designation: 16 (1) Acetyl fentanyl (N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)- 17 N-phenylacetamide)......................................................................9821 18 (2) Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl (N-[1-(1-methyl-2-phenethyl)-4- 19 piperidinyl]-N-phenylacetamide)..................................................9815 20 (3) Acetylmethadol.............................................................................9601 21 (4) AH-7921 (3.4-dichloro-N-[(1- 22 dimethylaminocyclohexylmethyl]benzamide)...............................9551 23 (4)(5) Allylprodine...........................................................................9602 24 (5)(6) Alphacetylmethadol...............................................................9603 25 (except levo-alphacetylmethadol also known as levo-alpha- 26 acetylmethadol, levomethadyl acetate or LAAM) 27 (6)(7) Alphameprodine.....................................................................9604 28 (7)(8) Alphamethadol.......................................................................9605 29 (8)(9) Alpha-methylfentanyl (N-[1-(alpha-methyl-beta-phenyl)ethyl-4- 30 piperidyl] propionanilide; 1-(1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)-4-(N- 31 propanilido) piperidine).................................................................9814 32 (9)(10) Alpha-methylthiofentanyl (N-[1-methyl-2-(2-thienyl)ethyl-4- 33 piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide).............................................9832 34 (10)(11) Benzethidine...........................................................................9606 35 (11)(12) Betacetylmethadol..................................................................9607 36 (12)(13) Beta-hydroxyfentanyl (N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenethyl)-4- SB 52—Am. by SC 2 1 piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide).............................................9830 2 (13)(14) Beta-hydroxy-3-methylfentanyl (other name: N-[1-(2-hydroxy- 3 2-phenethyl)-3-methyl-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide)....9831 4 (15) Beta-hydroxythiofentanyl (N-[1-[2-hydroxy-2-(thiophen-2- 5 yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-N-phenylpropionamide)..........................9836 6 (14)(16) Betameprodine.......................................................................9608 7 (15)(17) Betamethadol.........................................................................9609 8 (16)(18) Betaprodine............................................................................9611 9 (19) Butyryl fentanyl (N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N- 10 phenylbutyramide)........................................................................9822 11 (17)(20) Clonitazene.............................................................................9612 12 (18)(21) Dextromoramide....................................................................9613 13 (19)(22) Diampromide.........................................................................9615 14 (20)(23) Diethylthiambutene................................................................9616 15 (21)(24) Difenoxin...............................................................................9168 16 (22)(25) Dimenoxadol..........................................................................9617 17 (23)(26) Dimepheptanol.......................................................................9618 18 (24)(27) Dimethylthiambutene.............................................................9619 19 (25)(28) Dioxaphetyl butyrate..............................................................9621 20 (26)(29) Dipipanone.............................................................................9622 21 (27)(30) Ethylmethylthiambutene........................................................9623 22 (28)(31) Etonitazene.............................................................................9624 23 (29)(32) Etoxeridine.............................................................................9625 24 (33) Furanyl fentanyl N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylfuran-2- 25 carboxamide..................................................................................9834 26 (30)(34) Furethidine.............................................................................9626 27 (31)(35) Hydroxypethidine...................................................................9627 28 (32)(36) Ketobemidone........................................................................9628 29 (33)(37) Levomoramide.......................................................................9629 30 (34)(38) Levophenacylmorphan...........................................................9631 31 (35)(39) 3-Methylfentanyl (N-[3-methyl-1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidyl]- 32 N-phenylpropanamide)..................................................................9813 33 (36)(40) 3-Methylthiofentanyl (N-[(3-methyl-1-(2-thienyl)ethyl-4- 34 piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide).............................................9833 35 (37)(41) Morpheridine..........................................................................9632 36 (42) O-desmethyltramadol Some trade or other names: 2- 37 ((dimethylamino)methyl-1-(3- hydroxyphenyl)cyclohexanol; 3-(2- 38 ((dimethylamino)methyl)-1-hydroxycyclohexyl)phenol 39 (38)(43) MPPP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine).............9661 40 (39)(44) Noracymethadol.....................................................................9633 41 (40)(45) Norlevorphanol......................................................................9634 42 (41)(46) Normethadone........................................................................9635 43 (42)(47) Norpipanone...........................................................................9636 SB 52—Am. by SC 3 1 (43)(48) Para-fluorofentanyl (N-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-[1-(2-phenethyl)-4- 2 piperidinyl]propanamide)..............................................................9812 3 (44)(49) PEPAP (1-(-2-phenethyl)-4-phenyl-4-acetoxypiperidine).....9663 4 (45)(50) Phenadoxone..........................................................................9637 5 (46)(51) Phenampromide.....................................................................9638 6 (47)(52) Phenomorphan.......................................................................9647 7 (48)(53) Phenoperidine.........................................................................9641 8 (49)(54) Piritramide..............................................................................9642 9 (50)(55) Proheptazine...........................................................................9643 10 (51)(56) Properidine.............................................................................9644 11 (52)(57) Propiram.................................................................................9649 12 (53)(58) Racemoramide.......................................................................9645 13 (54)(59) Thiofentanyl (N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-thienyl)ethyl-4-piperidinyl]- 14 propanamide).................................................................................9835 15 (55)(60) Tilidine...................................................................................9750 16 (56)(61) Trimeperidine.........................................................................9646 17 (62) U-47700 (3,4-dichloro-N-[2-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]-N- 18 methylbenzamide) 19 (c) Any of the following opium derivatives, their salts, isomers and 20 salts of isomers, unless specifically excepted, whenever the existence of 21 these salts, isomers and salts of isomers is possible within the specific 22 chemical designation: 23 (1) Acetorphine...................................................................................9319 24 (2) Acetyldihydrocodeine...................................................................9051 25 (3) Benzylmorphine............................................................................9052 26 (4) Codeine methylbromide................................................................9070 27 (5) Codeine-N-Oxide..........................................................................9053 28 (6) Cyprenorphine...............................................................................9054 29 (7) Desomorphine...............................................................................9055 30 (8) Dihydromorphine..........................................................................9145 31 (9) Drotebanol.....................................................................................9335 32 (10) Etorphine (except hydrochloride salt)...........................................9056 33 (11) Heroin............................................................................................9200
Recommended publications
  • Granisetron "Vianex"
    EU‐RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN GRANISETRON VIANEX® 1 MG/ML, SOLUTION FOR INJECTION/ INFUSION precautionary measure, breast‐feeding should not be advised during treatment with Granisetron “Vianex”. Legal Status: Prescription only product. VI.2 Elements for a public summary VI.2.1 Overview of disease epidemiology Nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy and radiotheraphy: One of the most distressing symptoms for patients undergoing both surgery and chemotherapy is nausea and vomiting. These symptoms have a significant impact on quality of life and can lead to malnutrition, inability to respond to treatment and an increased length of hospitalization. Emesis is more commonly associated with chemotherapeutic agents; however, radiation‐induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) can affect a significant proportion of patients, depending on the treated area, dose fractionation, and volume of radiotherapy. The relative risk for developing nausea and vomiting with chemotherapy ranges from 30 to 90% and is dependent upon the chemotherapeutic agent used. Relative risk for nausea and vomiting with radiation therapy is approximately 40%.2,3,4,5 Post‐operative nausea and vomiting Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a major source of patient dissatisfaction and is the leading cause of discharge delays and unanticipated postsurgical hospital admissions. In the absence of pharmacological treatment, the rate of PONV is approximately 30% in general population, and can be as high as 70% in patients at highest risk. Several risk factors as surgery type, female gender, non‐smoker status, history of postoperative nausea and vomiting or motion sickness and post‐operative opioid use have been acknowledged. Additionally, post‐ operative vomiting (POV) occurs twice as frequently in children as in adults, increasing until puberty and then decreasing to adult incidence rates.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTIGATION of NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS for the DEVELOPMENT of OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS by Katherine M
    INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS By Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith Submitted to the graduate degree program in Medicinal Chemistry and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano _________________________________ Dr. Brian S. J. Blagg _________________________________ Dr. Michael F. Rafferty _________________________________ Dr. Paul R. Hanson _________________________________ Dr. Susan M. Lunte Date Defended: July 18, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano Date approved: July 18, 2012 ii ABSTRACT Kappa opioid (KOP) receptors have been suggested as an alternative target to the mu opioid (MOP) receptor for the treatment of pain because KOP activation is associated with fewer negative side-effects (respiratory depression, constipation, tolerance, and dependence). The KOP receptor has also been implicated in several abuse-related effects in the central nervous system (CNS). KOP ligands have been investigated as pharmacotherapies for drug abuse; KOP agonists have been shown to modulate dopamine concentrations in the CNS as well as attenuate the self-administration of cocaine in a variety of species, and KOP antagonists have potential in the treatment of relapse. One drawback of current opioid ligand investigation is that many compounds are based on the morphine scaffold and thus have similar properties, both positive and negative, to the parent molecule. Thus there is increasing need to discover new chemical scaffolds with opioid receptor activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Formats If You Require This Document in an Alternative Format, Please Contact: [email protected]
    University of Bath PHD The extraction and chemistry of the metabolites of Mimosa tenuiflora and Papaver somniferum Ninan, Aleyamma Award date: 1990 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 THE EXTRACTION AND CHEMISTRY OF THE METABOLITES OF MIMOSA TENUIFLORA AND PAP AVER SOMNIFERUM. submitted by ALEYAMMA NINAN for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Bath 1990 Attention is drawn to the fact that the copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without prior consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • ECO-Ssls for Pahs
    Ecological Soil Screening Levels for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Interim Final OSWER Directive 9285.7-78 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460 June 2007 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 2.0 SUMMARY OF ECO-SSLs FOR PAHs......................................1 3.0 ECO-SSL FOR TERRESTRIAL PLANTS....................................4 5.0 ECO-SSL FOR AVIAN WILDLIFE.........................................8 6.0 ECO-SSL FOR MAMMALIAN WILDLIFE..................................8 6.1 Mammalian TRV ...................................................8 6.2 Estimation of Dose and Calculation of the Eco-SSL ........................9 7.0 REFERENCES .........................................................16 7.1 General PAH References ............................................16 7.2 References Used for Derivation of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Eco-SSLs ......17 7.3 References Rejected for Use in Derivation of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Eco-SSLs ...............................................................18 7.4 References Used in Derivation of Wildlife TRVs .........................25 7.5 References Rejected for Use in Derivation of Wildlife TRV ................28 i LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 PAH Eco-SSLs (mg/kg dry weight in soil) ..............................4 Table 3.1 Plant Toxicity Data - PAHs ..........................................5 Table 4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Hallucinogens
    Hallucinogens What Are Hallucinogens? Hallucinogens are a diverse group of drugs that alter a person’s awareness of their surroundings as well as their thoughts and feelings. They are commonly split into two categories: classic hallucinogens (such as LSD) and dissociative drugs (such as PCP). Both types of hallucinogens can cause hallucinations, or sensations and images that seem real though they are not. Additionally, dissociative drugs can cause users to feel out of control or disconnected from their body and environment. Some hallucinogens are extracted from plants or mushrooms, and others are synthetic (human-made). Historically, people have used hallucinogens for religious or healing rituals. More recently, people report using these drugs for social or recreational purposes. Hallucinogens are a Types of Hallucinogens diverse group of drugs Classic Hallucinogens that alter perception, LSD (D-lysergic acid diethylamide) is one of the most powerful mind- thoughts, and feelings. altering chemicals. It is a clear or white odorless material made from lysergic acid, which is found in a fungus that grows on rye and other Hallucinogens are split grains. into two categories: Psilocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine) comes from certain classic hallucinogens and types of mushrooms found in tropical and subtropical regions of South dissociative drugs. America, Mexico, and the United States. Peyote (mescaline) is a small, spineless cactus with mescaline as its main People use hallucinogens ingredient. Peyote can also be synthetic. in a wide variety of ways DMT (N,N-dimethyltryptamine) is a powerful chemical found naturally in some Amazonian plants. People can also make DMT in a lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Subanesthetic Doses of Ketamine Transiently Decrease Serotonin Transporter Activity: a PET Study in Conscious Monkeys
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2013) 38, 2666–2674 & 2013 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/13 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Subanesthetic Doses of Ketamine Transiently Decrease Serotonin Transporter Activity: A PET Study in Conscious Monkeys 1 1 1 1 1 Shigeyuki Yamamoto , Hiroyuki Ohba , Shingo Nishiyama , Norihiro Harada , Takeharu Kakiuchi , 1 ,2 Hideo Tsukada and Edward F Domino* 1 2 Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Hamakita, Japan; Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Subanesthetic doses of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) antagonist, have a rapid antidepressant effect which lasts for up to 2 weeks. However, the neurobiological mechanism regarding this effect remains unclear. In the present study, the effects of subanesthetic doses of ketamine on serotonergic systems in conscious monkey brain were investigated. Five young monkeys 11 underwent four positron emission tomography measurements with [ C]-3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulfanyl)benzoni- 11 trile ([ C]DASB) for the serotonin transporter (SERT), during and after intravenous infusion of vehicle or ketamine hydrochloride in a 11 dose of 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg for 40 min, and 24 h post infusion. Global reduction of [ C]DASB binding to SERT was observed during ketamine infusion in a dose-dependent manner, but not 24 h later. The effect of ketamine on the serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A-R) and dopamine transporter (DAT) was also investigated in the same subjects studied with [11C]DASB. No significant changes were observed in either 5-HT -R or DAT binding after ketamine infusion. Microdialysis analysis indicated that ketamine infusion transiently increased 1A serotonin levels in the extracellular fluid of the prefrontal cortex.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT PROKINETIC MEDICATION USE in PETS Introduction Pathophysiology/Etiology to That Observed in Dogs
    VETTALK Volume 15, Number 04 American College of Veterinary Pharmacists THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT PROKINETIC MEDICATION USE IN PETS Introduction Pathophysiology/Etiology to that observed in dogs. It can be The moving topic of this Vet Talk As with most diseases in the veteri- due to a trichobezoar, dehydration, newsletter will be prokinetic medica- nary world, the etiology and patho- obesity, old age, diabetes, immobility, tions. The availability of information physiology of constipation are varied pain from trauma to the low back, on the many prokinetic agents is var- depending on the species being dis- bladder infection, or an anal sac infec- ied at best so an overall consensus of cussed, where in their gastrointestinal tion. In cases that are more chronic, prokinetic medications will be as- tract the problem is occurring, and underlying disease such as colitis or sessed in this article, hopefully giving any accompanying comorbid condi- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) may better insight to practitioners about tions. be the culprit. On the other hand, the which agents to use in their patients. cause may be idiopathic which is Canines: In man’s best friend, consti- frustrating for both veterinarian and Prevalence pation has many origins. A dog’s patient since this form is most diffi- Chronic constipation and gastroin- digestive tract itself is complex but cult to treat. testinal stasis are highly debilitating ultimately the mass movements and conditions that not only affect human haustral contractions from the large Equines: Despite their large size, patients but our four legged patients intestine (colon), propel feces into the horses have incredibly delicate diges- as well! Though this condition is rectum stimulating the internal anal tive systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Soma and Haoma: Ayahuasca Analogues from the Late Bronze Age
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Journal of Psychedelic Studies 3(2), pp. 104–116 (2019) DOI: 10.1556/2054.2019.013 First published online July 25, 2019 Soma and Haoma: Ayahuasca analogues from the Late Bronze Age MATTHEW CLARK* School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Department of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, University of London, London, UK (Received: October 19, 2018; accepted: March 14, 2019) In this article, the origins of the cult of the ritual drink known as soma/haoma are explored. Various shortcomings of the main botanical candidates that have so far been proposed for this so-called “nectar of immortality” are assessed. Attention is brought to a variety of plants identified as soma/haoma in ancient Asian literature. Some of these plants are included in complex formulas and are sources of dimethyl tryptamine, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and other psychedelic substances. It is suggested that through trial and error the same kinds of formulas that are used to make ayahuasca in South America were developed in antiquity in Central Asia and that the knowledge of the psychoactive properties of certain plants spreads through migrants from Central Asia to Persia and India. This article summarizes the main arguments for the botanical identity of soma/haoma, which is presented in my book, The Tawny One: Soma, Haoma and Ayahuasca (Muswell Hill Press, London/New York). However, in this article, all the topics dealt with in that publication, such as the possible ingredients of the potion used in Greek mystery rites, an extensive discussion of cannabis, or criteria that we might use to demarcate non-ordinary states of consciousness, have not been elaborated.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017
    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Receptorsreceptors
    OPIOIDOPIOID RECEPTORSRECEPTORS defined or “classical” types of opioid receptor µ,dk and . Alistair Corbett, Sandy McKnight and Graeme Genes encoding for these receptors have been cloned.5, Henderson 6,7,8 More recently, cDNA encoding an “orphan” receptor Dr Alistair Corbett is Lecturer in the School of was identified which has a high degree of homology to Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow the “classical” opioid receptors; on structural grounds Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, this receptor is an opioid receptor and has been named Glasgow G4 0BA, UK. ORL (opioid receptor-like).9 As would be predicted from 1 Dr Sandy McKnight is Associate Director, Parke- their known abilities to couple through pertussis toxin- Davis Neuroscience Research Centre, sensitive G-proteins, all of the cloned opioid receptors Cambridge University Forvie Site, Robinson possess the same general structure of an extracellular Way, Cambridge CB2 2QB, UK. N-terminal region, seven transmembrane domains and Professor Graeme Henderson is Professor of intracellular C-terminal tail structure. There is Pharmacology and Head of Department, pharmacological evidence for subtypes of each Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical receptor and other types of novel, less well- Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, characterised opioid receptors,eliz , , , , have also been Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. postulated. Thes -receptor, however, is no longer regarded as an opioid receptor. Introduction Receptor Subtypes Preparations of the opium poppy papaver somniferum m-Receptor subtypes have been used for many hundreds of years to relieve The MOR-1 gene, encoding for one form of them - pain. In 1803, Sertürner isolated a crystalline sample of receptor, shows approximately 50-70% homology to the main constituent alkaloid, morphine, which was later shown to be almost entirely responsible for the the genes encoding for thedk -(DOR-1), -(KOR-1) and orphan (ORL ) receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Salvia Divinorum: Clinical and Research Potential
    18 m a p s • v o l u m e x i i i n u m b e r 1 • s p r i n g 2 0 0 3 Salvia divinorum: Clinical and Research Potential Karl R. Hanes, Ph.D. ([email protected]), Cognitive- Behavioural Treatment Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Salvia divinorum is a perennial Mexican herb from the labiate (mint) family (Epling & Jativa, 1962) that has a history of use chiefly for the initiation and facilitation of shamanic practice among such peoples as the Mazatec Indians of the Sierra Mazateca region of Oaxaca, Mexico, and possibly by earlier human civilizations (Johnson, 1939; Wasson, 1962; Ott, 1995). In its capacity as a tool of divination, the predomi- nant known use of this plant (aside from general problem solving, such as finding lost objects) occurred in the context of healing ceremonies, for the treatment of disease. Typically, these healing rituals involved the oral consumption of large doses (50-100 leaves) of the plant in order to induce altered states of consciousness that fostered the detection of specific ailments. Significantly, the means of such identification of a specific condition Salvia divinorum was often through self-report. The Mazatec Indians, who referred to this herb by a number of names, most commonly ‘ska Maria pastora’ (‘leaves of the Virgin Mary, the Shepherdess’), also employed this plant medicinally for the management of such conditions as headache, diarrhoea, rheumatism and anaemia (Valdez, Diaz & Paul, 1983). Recent investigations have isolated the neoclerodane diterpenes Salvinorin A, B and C as the main constituents (Ortega, Blount & Manchand, 1982; Valdez et al., 2001; Roth et al., 2002), and the psychoactivity of this herb, identified by earlier investigators (Wasson, 1962), has been clearly delineated only recently (Siebert, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Cannabis Antagonists for Marijuana Intoxication
    Central Journal of Pharmacology & Clinical Toxicology Bringing Excellence in Open Access Review Article *Corresponding author Matthew Kagan, M.D., Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA, Tel: 310- Potential Cannabis Antagonists 423-3465; Fax: 310.423.8397; Email: Matthew.Kagan@ cshs.org Submitted: 11 October 2018 for Marijuana Intoxication Accepted: 23 October 2018 William W. Ishak, Jonathan Dang, Steven Clevenger, Shaina Published: 25 October 2018 Ganjian, Samantha Cohen, and Matthew Kagan* ISSN: 2333-7079 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, USA Copyright © 2018 Kagan et al. Abstract OPEN ACCESS Keywords Cannabis use is on the rise leading to the need to address the medical, psychosocial, • Cannabis and economic effects of cannabis intoxication. While effective agents have not yet been • Cannabinoids implemented for the treatment of acute marijuana intoxication, a number of compounds • Antagonist continue to hold promise for treatment of cannabinoid intoxication. Potential therapeutic • Marijuana agents are reviewed with advantages and side effects. Three agents appear to merit • Intoxication further inquiry; most notably Cannabidiol with some evidence of antipsychotic activity • THC and in addition Virodhamine and Tetrahydrocannabivarin with a similar mixed receptor profile. Given the results of this research, continued development of agents acting on cannabinoid receptors with and without peripheral selectivity may lead to an effective treatment for acute cannabinoid intoxication. Much work still remains to develop strategies that will interrupt and reverse the effects of acute marijuana intoxication. ABBREVIATIONS Therapeutic uses of cannabis include chronic pain, loss of appetite, spasticity, and chemotherapy-associated nausea and CBD: Cannabidiol; CBG: Cannabigerol; THCV: vomiting [8]. Recreational cannabis use is on the rise with more Tetrahydrocannabivarin; THC: Tetrahydrocannabinol states approving its use and it is viewed as no different from INTRODUCTION recreational use of alcohol or tobacco [9].
    [Show full text]