Building Value – TEDCO Corporate Plan 2008-2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Building Value – TEDCO Corporate Plan 2008-2010 BUILDING VALUE TEDCO CORPORATE PLAN 2008 – 2010 TORONTO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION “TORONTO’S AGENDA FOR BUILDING VALUE PROSPERITY COMMITS US TEDCO CORPORATE PLAN TO BUILDING A VIBRANT, 2008 – 2010 CREATIVE AND INNOVATIVE CITY WITH STRONG LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RELATIONS AND INDUSTRIES. WITH PROJECTS LIKE FILMPORT, CANPAR AND THE CORUS TEDCO AT A GLANCE 02 BUILDING, WE CELEBRATE LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN 04 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT & CEO 06 THE KIND OF VISION AND COMPANY HIGHLIGHTS 08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 LEADERSHIP THAT ALLOWS REAL ESTATE 24 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 32 THE CITY OF TORONTO TEDCO INITIATIVES 36 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 43 TO PROSPER.” SENIOR MANAGEMENT 47 GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIALS 50 MAYOR DAVID MILLER, CITY OF TORONTO PARTNERS AND RECOGNITION 52 TEDCO AT A GLANCE 3,700 1.8 121 01: TEDCO is Toronto’s urban 04: TEDCO pursues opportunities 08: TEDCO supports entrepre- development corporation, that generate new high-quality neurial job development and ESTIMATED NEW AND MILLION SQUARE FEET OF NEW ACRES OF BROWNFIELD LANDS incorporated in 1986 as a company jobs and increase new industrial skill creation through the support RETAINED JOBS THROUGH NEW PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT RESTORED TO PRODUCTIVE under the Ontario Business and commercial assessment and of business incubation and DEVELOPMENT USE SINCE 1992 Corporations Act and governed investment to support the long- commercialization programs. by its Board of Directors. term prosperity of the City of Toronto. 09: TEDCO strategically and 02: As a leading city builder, proactively encourages invest- TEDCO nurtures involvement of 05: TEDCO’s revenue-generating ment in underutilized, vacant the private sector as well as other business is real estate develop- or brownfield properties, which, orders of government and public ment, and property management in turn, enhances tax revenues + agencies to effectively fulfill and and leasing, which add value to for the City of Toronto. 500 111 implement public policy impera- the City through quality initiatives tives in a business-like manner. in urban design and sustainable 10: TEDCO continuestopioneer ACRES OF LAND OWNED ACRES UNDER development. and take leadership in environ- REDEVELOPMENT 03: TEDCO MISSION:Asthe mental matters through its principal urban development 06: TEDCO is proactive, innova- remediation expertise and corporation owned by the City of tive and creative in developing award-winning Environmental Toronto, TEDCO exists to act as a unique approaches to complex Management Program (EMP). catalyst to improve the economic economic, social and environ- competitiveness of Toronto mental issues across the City directly and with partners; to of Toronto. $ $ increase investment in the key 800 07: TEDCO is not an agency of the 4.3 550 economic infrastructure of the City; and to redevelop underuti- City nor a government department MILLION 2007 PROPERTY MILLION INVESTMENT FOR JOBS CREATED IN 2007 lized and brownfield properties. but is an arms-length corporation TAXES PAID PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TEDCO SUPPORTED that functions in an entrepreneur- BUSINESS INCUBATORS ial and nimble fashion. It is structured to act with efficiency and focus with a range of public and private sector partners. $ 8 360 TONNES OF CO2 EMISSIONS MILLION INVESTED IN BUSINESS ELIMINATED THROUGH CANPAR INCUBATION SINCE 1989 AND FILMPORT REMEDIATION PROCESS 02 ROWLAND FLEMING LETTER FROM THE CHAIR At the core of every successful urban region is a increasingly over the past several years, environ- TEDCO as either an agency or a department of the enable TEDCO to move forward with greater relevance dynamic city that attracts investment, employment mentally sustainable development. City of Toronto. It is neither. TEDCO’s structure is and adaptability than at any time in its history. and momentum to the entire area. The Greater unique in that it is mandated to fulfill public policy Toronto Area is such a region. By many measures it Today more than ever, Toronto and TEDCO stand at a imperatives while at the same time operating as a All of these advances have brought a new sense of is one of the fastest-growing regions in North crossroads. The strategic direction we take and the nimble business entity. excitement and purpose to our activities, and a new America and the city itself is hailed for its civility, related investments we make will have profound understanding of our role. Crucial to our success is livability and drive. long-term effects for the millions of people who will Executing the Board’s vision for TEDCO is a strong the City of Toronto and all of the various staff and call Toronto their home in the years to come. management team headed by Jeffrey Steiner who city departments who have been instrumental in Certainly Toronto, as well as every major city in the joined the corporation in 2002, bringing with him a our ability to move forward. TEDCO will continue to developed world, is facing challenges. But I believe The direction we have taken and our priorities for new sense of urgency and direction to the corpora- build value for our shareholder and the people of that the success Toronto enjoys today is largely a 2008-2010 are highlighted in this Corporate Plan. tion’s activities. It is no surprise that the most Toronto who inhabit one of the great urban regions function of decisions made 10, 20 and even 50 years We are successfully delivering on the City’s require- dramatic changes within TEDCO have come in the of North America. ago. One of those decisions was made in 1986 when ments for faster, more aggressive and innovative past five years when our assets, our scope and our the City of Toronto established TEDCO to be its eco- development. These successes are fostered activities have all increased dramatically. One of the nomic development corporation. Since then TEDCO’s through the vision of our truly exceptional board of reasons for this dramatic increase is our expanded mandate and methods have changed with the times directors who bring expertise from both the private mandate to operate city wide rather than continuing to help ensure that Toronto can remain at the fore- and public sectors to guide a corporation that itself to focus primarily on the Port Lands. These changes Rowland Fleming front of job creation, economic development and, is a public-private hybrid. It is easy to think of have helped us build a strong foundation that will Chairman of the Board 04 05 JEFFREY D. STEINER LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO The purpose of a city’s economic development recently, property developers — we manage our land The past few years have seen an acceleration of guidance and the support to grow TEDCO,its corporation is to tap into the best of both the private assets to a commercially prudent standard. Our activity for TEDCO as we completed research, plan- mandate, activities and effectiveness to levels and public sectors to achieve City Building in a experience in dealing with the “brownfield” legacy of ning and negotiation stages of various projects to that were barely conceived of when the Corporation business-like way. As Toronto’s urban development contamination in Toronto’s Port Lands has given us successfully carry out our mandate. TEDCO’s Corus began its work in the 1980s.Ialsowanttoacknowl- corporation, TEDCO has partnered with remarkable the insight to continue to pioneer and take leadership Entertainment building is scheduled for completion edge the management and staff of TEDCO who businesses, public organizations and investors in environmental matters across the City. TEDCO’s in 2009 and is the first commercial office building work tirelessly to embrace our new sense of mission thesepastyears.Iwouldliketoextendmydeep role does not end here. We are also a facilitator, under construction in the East Bayfront precinct of and confidence in realizing just how effective the appreciation to all of our stakeholders for their negotiator and a catalyst, beginning with our own Toronto’s waterfront. Nearby in the Port Lands we, Corporation can be in adding value to our great city. insight, their expertise and their faith in our initia- lands and looking across the city to other initiatives. together with our tenant FILMPORT, are transforming tives. By working with us, our partners enforce our some 20 acres of a former oil tank repository into This is a time of unprecedented growth and belief that by linking public policy priorities with Since our corporate strategy is to be a leading City one of the largest and most advanced film and transition for the Toronto Economic Development private sector imperatives we all gain a powerful Builder, our motivation remains to create positive television production studios in Canada. Corporation and for the City of Toronto. We look advantage in reaching our collective goals. outcomes to benefit the City of Toronto and its forward to continuing to fulfill our mandate and citizens. This means that, although our focus is The financial value we generate from these develop- explore new initiatives. These collective goals stem from our city-wide man- mostly on economic growth and job creation, it is ments is leveraged into new developments, creates date set by our sole shareholder, the City of Toronto, also about cutting-edge urban redevelopment. In value for the City, and allows us to continue to through City Council, with whom we work closely to such a rapidly changing environment, TEDCO’s role support economic development initiatives and our achieve our mutual objectives. In order to better has become increasingly proactive and full of incubator and commercialization programs. achieve these objectives, we have strengthened our interesting challenges. Jeffrey D. Steiner operations in areas such as governance, finance, None of this could be realized without the strong President & CEO strategy, technology and human resources. As one of I am pleased to say that we are meeting these direction and encouragement of our Board of the largest landowners in the city — and, more challenges.
Recommended publications
  • Minutes Budget Committee
    Minutes Budget Committee Meeting No. 9 (Special) Contact Merle MacDonald,Committee Administrator Meeting Date March 26, 28, 29, and April 2, 2007 Phone 416-392-7340 Start Time 9:35 AM E-mail [email protected] Location Committee Room 1, City Hall Attendance Members of the Budget Committee were present for some or all of the time periods indicated under the section headed “Meeting Sessions”, which appears at the end of the Minutes. Councillor Shelley Carroll, Chair X Councillor Paul Ainslie, Vice-Chair X Councillor Maria Augimeri X Councillor A.A. Heaps X Councillor Joe Mihevc X Councillor Gord Perks X Councillor Kyle Rae X Also Present: Councillor Brian Ashton Councillor Chin Lee Councillor Janet Davis Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker Councillor Pam McConnell Councillor Mike Del Grande Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong Councillor Frank Di Giorgio Councillor Howard Moscoe Councillor Mike Feldman Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone Councillor Paula Fletcher Councillor David Shiner Councillor Adam Giambrone Councillor Karen Stintz Councillor Doug Holyday Councillor Michael Thompson Councillor Cliff Jenkins Councillor Adam Vaughan 2 Budget Committee – March 26, 28, 29 and April 2, 2007 Minutes BU9.1 Information Received 2007 Operating Budget Summary To receive a Presentation by the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to introduce the 2007 Operating Budget and to hold Operating Budget Hearings for Councillors and for Stakeholder Groups and the General Public. Speakers Karl Sprogis, Chair,
    [Show full text]
  • Novae Res Urbis
    FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 2017 REFUSAL 3 20 YEARS LATER 4 Replacing rentals Vol. 21 Stronger not enough No. 24 t o g e t h e r 20TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION NRU TURNS 20! AND THE STORY CONTINUES… Dominik Matusik xactly 20 years ago today, are on our walk selling the NRU faxed out its first City neighbourhood. But not the E of Toronto edition. For the developers. The question is next two decades, it covered whether the developers will the ups and downs of the city’s join the walk.” planning, development, and From 2017, it seems like municipal affairs news, though the answer to that question is a email has since replaced the fax resounding yes. machine. Many of the issues “One of the innovative the city cared about in 1997 still parts of the Regent Park resonate in 2017. From ideas for Revitalization,” downtown the new Yonge-Dundas Square city planning manager David to development charges along Oikawa wrote in an email the city’s latest subway line and to NRU, “was the concept of trepidations about revitalizing using [condos] to fund the Regent Park. It was an eventful needed new assisted public year. housing. A big unknown at The entire first edition of Novæ Res Urbis (2 pages), June 16, 1997 Below are some headlines from the time was [whether] that NRU’s first year and why these concept [would] work. Would issues continue to captivate us. private home owners respond to the idea of living and New Life for Regent Park investing in a mixed, integrated (July 7, 1997) community? Recently, some condo townhouses went on sale In 1997, NRU mused about the in Regent Park and were sold future of Regent Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Toronto Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan Our Common Grounds
    CITY CLERK Consolidated Clause in Economic Development and Parks Committee Report 5, which was considered by City Council on July 20, 21 and 22, 2004. 2 Toronto Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan Our Common Grounds (All Wards) City Council on July 20, 21 and 22, 2004, amended this Clause by: (1) adding to Recommendation (28)(c) contained in Attachment 1, entitled “Our Common Grounds: Toronto Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan”, the words, “and access to ice time in Toronto rinks”, so that Recommendation (28)(c) shall now read as follows: “(c) more female programming, to level the gender playing field in sport and recreation, including dance, female-only sports and workshops, and access to ice time in Toronto rinks;”; and (2) adding the following: “That: (a) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be requested to consult with Ward Councillors and report to the Economic Development and Parks Committee on: (i) existing garbage collection in parks; and (ii) options for ensuring the provision of a higher quality service; and (b) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, in consultation with the Acting Medical Officer of Health, be requested to report to the Economic Development and Parks Committee, in September 2004, on the feasibility of creating a reasonably-priced, fixed-cost, ‘healthy recovery’ monthly program pass for survivors of serious illnesses, such as cancer, heart disease, stroke and HIV.” This Clause, as amended, was adopted by City Council. _________ The Economic Development and Parks
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Voices for Ranked Ballots in Toronto
    Conservative voices for ranked ballots in Toronto In June 2013, Toronto City Council voted 26-15 in favour of asking the province for permission to use ranked ballots. Residents of Toronto are now hoping that all parties at Queen’s Park will work together to pass Bill 166, “!e Toronto Ranked Ballot Elections Act”. Here are some conservative voices in favour of this proposal: “All I’d like to see is far more turnover and candidates who are sent to City Hall by the majority of their residents. Run-off voting is a step in the right direction.” “By changing the voting system, the election would result in a candidate being selected by a greater than Sue-Ann Levy 50% majority of voters and therefore would be the most representative of the will of the people.” Case Ootes “Our whole system is broken. We shouldn’t be the victims of a system that makes winners out of losers. There is a better way “The ranked ballot would be a vast to do this. It’s called improvement over the status quo” Instant Runoff” Jerry Agar Andrew Coyne Friendly Elections. Fair Results. Request to Examine Alternate Methods of Electing the Mayor of Toronto Moved by Councillor Case Ootes, seconded by Councillor Mike Feldman. Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2010 “The City of Toronto is the largest city in Can- ada and the Mayor of Toronto receives the - da. As Toronto is such a heavily populated metropolis, the race for Mayor can be high- ly contested with many candidates, high To ensure that the individual who is elected is representative of the majority of voters in the City, the Municipal Elections Act should be altered to state that the race for Mayor should be decided by a form of voting that represents a result of 50% + 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tabia-Resourceguide09-Web.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS TORONTO/TABIA FACTSHEET _________________________________________________ 2 THE BIA STORY __________________________________________________________ 3 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF TABIA __________________________________________ 4 TABIA ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ______________________________________________ 5-7 TABIA COMMITTEES Tax _______________________________________________________________ 8-9 Marketing & Communications ______________________________________________ 10 Tourism ____________________________________________________________ 11 Transportation ________________________________________________________ 12-13 Task Force on Crime ____________________________________________________ 14 TABIA WEBSITE _________________________________________________________ 15 TABIA MILESTONES AND ACHIEVEMENTS ________________________________________ 16-17 GREENTBIZ ____________________________________________________________ 18 TABIA DISCOUNTS & SAVINGS PROGRAMS Savings for BIA Boards __________________________________________________ 19-20 Savings for Member Businesses ____________________________________________ 21-22 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROJECT ___________________________ 24 ACCESSIBILITY FOR ONTARIANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT _____________________________ 25 CITY OF TORONTO BIA OFFICE Commercial Area Advisors ________________________________________________ 26-27 Community Advisor Designers ______________________________________________ 26-27 Councillors __________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Folder E1 – Parking Annual Report Examples
    CITY OF LINCOLN - PARKING SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2005 Table of Contents CATEGORY PAGE Mission and Vision Statements 2 Message from the Parking Manager 3 Parking System Organization 4 Financial Overview 5-7 Utilization Study 8 Carriage Park 9-10 Center Park 11-12 Cornhusker 13-14 Haymarket 15-16 Market Place 17-18 Que Place 19-20 University Square 21-22 Transient Ticket Analysis 23 Duration of Stay Report 24 Parking Programs and Specials 25-26 Validation Sales Comparisons 27 Husker Football 28-29 Violations 30-32 Appendix Space Allocation 33-35 Mission “The Parking Section is defined by using appropriate strategies and oversight to promote compliance with its mission and related goals. This is done by supporting existing and future land uses, assisting the City’s economic development initiatives, and preserving parking by providing adequate and high quality parking resources and related services for all users while maintaining and/or increasing revenues to support future parking development.” Vision “To protect the City’s investment in the parking system by maintaining and improving on a safe, reliable, and efficient parking facilities and equipment. There will be a continuing need to maintain and improve the City’s existing and future parking facilities and equipment. This will be accomplished by utilizing the necessary training, technologies, and modern equipment. The City of Lincoln’s Parking Section will meet escalating public demands, by increasing the system’s ability to be more efficient, accountable, and responsive. The parking system will continue to efficiently serve the public with the highest standards of quality, safety, and responsiveness while working to increase public parking effectiveness.” page 2 Message from the Parking Manager I would like to present you the Public Works and Utilities Parking Section's first "official" annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Globe and Mail Council Spent Over $250,000 Against Advice of Its Lawyers
    The Globe and Mail Council spent over $250,000 against advice of its lawyers Tue Mar 8 2011 Page: A16 Section: Toronto News Byline: Kelly Grant Toronto city council has spent more than $250,000 pursuing a legal fight against the advice of its own Along with former councillors Mr. Moscoe and Mr. lawyers, including $96,057 on a recent unsuccessful Jenkins, the other contributors were Joe Mihevc, court case, according to confidential documents Mark Grimes, Mike Feldman, Frank Di Giorgio, Bill viewed by The Globe and Mail. Saundercook, Adam Vaughan, Michael Walker, John Filion, David Shiner, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Chin The city's top lawyer, Anna Kinastowski, is Lee and Ron Moeser. recommending council abandon its quest for access to a database containing private information about On July 14, 2008, both Mr. Rust D'Eye and Ann residents, something the province's privacy Cavoukian, the provincial privacy commissioner, sent commissioner and two outside legal experts warned letters to then-mayor David Miller and to council would violate privacy laws. eviscerating the Zarnett opinion. But if council votes this week to reject that advice, an "With due respect, this legal opinion can hardly be appeal would cost at least another $35,000, the characterized as 'expert, ' given that it provides, at documents say. best, faulty advice," Ms. Cavoukian wrote. "It's time to put a stop to the nonsense," said deputy Despite this, council voted 27-12 in October, 2008, to mayor Doug Holyday, who tried in 2008 to halt the take the case to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes North York Community Council
    Minutes North York Community Council Meeting No. 16 Contact Francine Adamo, Committee Administrator Meeting Date Tuesday, June 10, 2008 Phone 416-395-7348 Start Time 9:30 AM E-mail [email protected] Location Council Chamber, North York Civic Centre Attendance Members of the North York Community Council were present for some or all of the time periods indicated under the section headed “Meeting Sessions”, which appears at the end of the Minutes. Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair X Councillor Shelley Carroll X Councillor Mike Feldman Councillor John Filion X Councillor Cliff Jenkins X Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong X Councillor Howard Moscoe X Councillor John Parker X Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Vice-Chair Councillor David Shiner X Councillor Karen Stintz X Regrets: Councillors Feldman and Perruzza. Councillor Augimeri in the Chair. Confirmation of minutes On motion by Councillor Moscoe, the minutes of the North York Community Council meeting held on May 6, 2008 were confirmed. 2 North York Community Council – June 10, 2008 Minutes NY16.1 ACTION Adopted Ward: 25 Draft By-law - To name the proposed private lanes & walkways at the retail commercial development at 939 Lawrence Avenue East, The Shops at Don Mills, as Karl Fraser Road, Leadley Lane, Pabst Lane, Sampson Mews, Maginn Mews, Aggie Hogg Gardens, Marie Labatte Road, Clock Tower Road, and O’Neill Road Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 (May 22, 2008) Draft By-law from City Solicitor Recommendations That the North York Community Council enact the Draft By-law from the City Solicitor. Summary To name the proposed private lanes and walkways at the retail commercial development at 939 Lawrence Avenue East, The Shops at Don Mills, as “Karl Fraser Road”, “Leadley Lane”, “Pabst Lane”, “Sampson Mews”, “Maginn Mews”, “Aggie Hogg Gardens”, “Marie Labatte Road”, “Clock Tower Road” and “O’Neill Road”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario / Quebec October 21, 2001 and March 18, 2002
    Canada’s Urban Strategy A Vision for the21st Century Prime Minister’s Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues Chair: Judy Sgro,MP Interim Report April 2002 April 30, 2002 The Right Honourable Jean Chrétien, P.C. M.P. Prime Minister of Canada House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 Dear Prime Minister: We are pleased to present the Interim Report of the Prime Minister’s Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues, which was directed in May, 2001 to engage in a dialogue with fellow Canadians and to examine the challenges and opportunities facing our urban regions. In our view, this Interim Report provides an accurate picture of urban Canada in the 21st Century – its pressures and its problems. On behalf of the members of the Task Force, we would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to hear the views of Canadians on this important issue. We look forward to continuing the dialogue through the next phase of our mandate when we will present a final report on the responses arising from the ideas and recommendations expressed in this report. Sincerely, Judy Sgro, Member of Parliament, York West Chair, Prime Minister’s Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues Dr. Bernard Patry, Member of Parliament, Pierrefonds-Dollard Vice-Chair, Prime Minister’s Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues The Honourable Tommy Banks, Senator (Alberta) Vice-Chair, Prime Minister’s Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues ii CANADA’S URBAN STRATEGY: A VISION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Prime Minister’s Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues Judy Sgro, M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Plan for the Creative City
    CITY OF TORONTO Culture Plan for the Creative City Culture Plan for the Creative City CITY OF TORONTO 2003 Cover: courtesy of Ballet Creole, photographer: Jun Sae Hong Portions of the text of this publication may be reproduced without charge or written permission provided that appropriate acknowledgment is made of the source. For information about reproducing photographs, contact the Culture Division at the addresses below. For more information, contact the Culture Division, City of Toronto, at: Email: [email protected] Phone: (416) 397-5253 Mail: Culture Division 9th Floor, East Tower City Hall Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2 Design: Toronto Corporate Communications 03R71 131 Culture Plan CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ 1 Principles ........................................................... 5 A Plan for All Seasons.................................................. 5 Imagining the Creative City.............................................. 7 Driving Forward ..................................................... 11 Cultural Renaissance ............................................. 12 Integrating Diversity............................................... 14 Attracting Youth ................................................. 14 The City’s Portfolio ................................................... 17 Taking Stock .................................................... 17 Asset Rich, Cash Poor ............................................. 18 Public Art: The People’s Treasures ......................................
    [Show full text]