DOCSLIB.ORG

The Runic Alphabet 8/29/07

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Runic Alphabet 8/29/07 The Runic Alphabet 8/29/07 1 History and use Germanic peoples used runic alphabets from ca. c1 to the Middle Ages. Gothic rūna can translate Lat. mystērium ‘mystery; secret’, and OE rūn has a range of meanings, including ‘mystery; counsel; discussion; word’. Early runic rūn meant ‘message; text’ (Antonsen 1990: 314). The original meaning had to do with scratching (Morris 1985). The mystery and magic associations were products of specialized knowledge in an illiterate society. Also, from c–6 to the Middle Ages mystical power was associated with correct recitation of the abecedarium. There are extant some 5000 runic inscriptions, some 3000 in Sweden alone, about 1100 in Norway, some 700 in Denmark, and about 60 in England. The farther south one goes, the rarer runic inscriptions become. From southeastern Europe, there are three inscriptions (or four, if Kowel is included) from the third to the fifth century, associated with the Goths who settled in the Black Sea area. Of the roughly 250 early Germanic inscriptions in the older runic alphabet, only a little over fifty have more than two identifiable words. Most have only one or two words. One of the oldest runic inscriptions is the Øvra Stabu spearhead, Oppland, Norway [150– 200] (Kr. 31, ORI 1): The inscription reads raunijaz ‘(the) tester’. Compare OIce reynir ‘tester’, agentive to reyna ‘to test, try’. Another very early spearhead is that from Kowel, West Ukraine [ca.200–50] (Kr. 33, ORI 96): t The inscription reads tilarīds ‘attacker’, ‘goal-pursuer’, or the like (cf. OE tilian ‘to attain’, OIce ríða ‘to ride’). Only some ten percent of the old runic texts have more than two identifiable words; cf. bracteate 1 from Skåne, Sweden [ca.500–50] (ORI 85): lᚨQᚢlᚨᚢᴧ ᛉ ᛫ X ᴧ ᛉ ᚨ l ᚢ laþū laukaz ᛫ gakaz alu ‘invitation leek cuckoo? magic’ Compare OE laðu ‘summons’, OIce laukr ‘leek’, OE ealu ‘ale, beer’. The third word is unclear. If it is a misspelling for gaukaz ‘cuckoo’, cf. OIce gaukr ‘id.’. The Runic Alphabet 2 The older Fuþark had 24 letters, arranged in three sets of eight (OIce ǽttir ‘rows of eight’), as on the Vadstena bracteate, Östergötland, Sweden [500–50] (ORI 90): ᛞ ᛟ ᛜ ᛐ ᛗ ᛖ ᛁ ᛏ : ᛘ ᛁ ᛇ ᛁ æ ᛁ ᛁ : ¢ ᚷ % ᛐ ô Ü ™ d o ŋ l m e b t s z p æ y i n h w g k r a þ u f The three sets of eight were probably rhythmic subdivisions for recitation. Compare the 7–9–7 division of the English alphabet jingle: A B C D E F G || H I J K L M N O P || Q R S T U & V … The main difference between the Vadstena bracteate and the slightly earlier Kylver stone from Gotland, Sweden [350–475] (ORI 30), is that the latter has /p/ before /æ/ and reverses the final two runes. Its order is left-to-right. 2 Runic vowel letters The runic alphabet had six letters for vowels: i /i/ <11> U /u/ <2> < I (?) <13> e /e/ <19> a /a/ <4> o /o/ <24> or <23> The mysterious thirteenth rune is much disputed. In later use, it is a variant of i /i/ which, at the time of its creation would have been entirely unmotivated and exceptional. However, it is not difficult to ascertain the nature of the thirteenth rune. Early Germanic had eight vowels, and long and short /ī/ – /i/, /ū/ – /u/, etc., were not distinguished in any ancient script. Matching Early Germanic vowels and runic letters yields the following distribution: short long i /i/ <11> U /u/ <2> < i /ī/ <11> U /ū/ <2> < e /e/ <19> a /a/ <4> I /ǣ/ <13> o /ō/ <24>/<23> By process of elimination, the thirteenth rune had to be /ǣ/ (Antonsen 1975; 2002). This is confirmed by a rather unexpected source. The oldest runic inscription in Old English is on a roe-deer’s ankle bone from Caistor-by-Norwich [ca.400]: raᛇhan ‘roe(deer)’ The Runic Alphabet 3 The etymology of roe is *roi-ko-Hon- > Gmc. *raiχōn (HGE 295) > OE rā(ha). Around 400, /ai/ was in the process of being monophthongized, which presupposes lowering of the glide, viz. /ai/ > [aæ], with a value very close to the postulated value of the thirteenth rune. Consequently, my reading of the Caistor-by-Norwich inscription is raæhan ‘roe’ (Miller 1994: 70). The runes I and O originally represented only long vowels /ǣ/, /ō/. Subsequent loss of Germanic /ǣ/ rendered the thirteenth rune useless. The introduction of short /o/, as in *hurną > runic horna ‘horn’, entailed the extension of o to short /o/, on the model of other letters used for both long and short vowels. With the later loss of initial */y/ in North Germanic, the rune Y jāra and its variants, which evolved to H, was now pronounced āra, and could be used for /ā/ and /a/. This was advantageous because the old ansuz rune a was by this time pronounced as nasal /ą/, allowing for a contrast between h /a, ā/ and a /ą/ (cf. Moltke 1985: 139). For the new h rune, customarily transcribed A, note the name Hariwolf ‘armywolf’ on the Stentoften stone, Blekinge, Sweden [600–50] (ORI 119): Hh 5 i 1 ᛟ l h F Y h A r i w o l A f z Inverted Y often represents rhotacized /R/, as possibly here. The second A h in the name is epenthetic, whence it has been concluded that the rune also has the value [ə] (Schulte 2003: 393f.). 3 Runic class/manner projections On a sequential projection from f1 to d24, the letters all fall in place as natural classes with respect to their major category features. The odd letter æ, conspicuously bearing the number <13>, forms a kind of dividing line. continu.: f1 þ3 χ/h9 z15 s16 syllabic: u2 a4 i11 æ13 e19 o23 sonorant: r5 w8 n10 y12 m20 l21 ŋ22 stop: vcl.: k6 p14 t17 vcd.: g7 b18 d24 The continuants to the left of CENTER are arranged front to back; the most strident (sibilants) stand alone on the right. The vowels to the left of center occur in two clusters, back /u/ /a/ before front /i/ /æ/, which in turn subdivide into high before low. The mid vowels /e/ /o/ occur (mirror image) front before back to the right of center. The Runic Alphabet 4 As the resonants stand, there is a curious interspersing. The placeless /r/ stands alone, followed by front to back /w/ /n/ /y/ (glide-nasal-glide) on the left and /m/ /l/ /ŋ/ (nasal-lateral-nasal) on the right. Following the pattern of the ancient Canaanite scripts, similar and dissimilar classes are alternated (Miller 1994: 73ff., w. lit). The stops subdivide very naturally into voiced and voiceless, and in both cases, the order is velar > labial > dental, conforming to the Sonority Hierarchy and / or indpendent feature geometry. Moreover, dentals also come last in the Canaanite matrices. Hence the conflict between some fuþarks ending in /d/ (e.g. the Vadstena and Grumpan bracteates) and others (e.g. the Kylver stone) ending in /o/ ᛟ (from Ω omega), following the Greek tradition. 4 Source(s) of the runic letters As in all ancient scripts, letters face the direction of writing. All letters have at least two alternants, which modern fonts do not readily accommodate. Therefore the list below has fewer variant forms than occur in the earliest runic inscriptions. Also, in some sense, the forms are idealized since many other variations also occur. For details and discussion, see Morris (1988), Miller (1994, ch. 5), Antonsen (2002). f ™ /f/ = variant of F, as in the Latin alphabet uþ ᚢ /u/ = Italic V inverted T ᚧ /þ/ = D ‘d’ or a variant of Gk. Δ ‘delta’ or invented ‘thorn’ a ᛐ ᛡ /a/ = frequent ancient variant of ᚥ = A r % /r/ = variant of Gk. Ρ ‘rho’ found in several areas, e.g. Taras/Tarentum ᚲ ᛎ > /k/ = NW Semitic or * Ó without the stave, hence the small ᚲ g /g/ = regular + backward Γ ‘gamma’ (reduplicated) w ¢ /w/ = cf. Proto-Sinaitic ¢ ‘waw’ h N и /h/ = variant of H n ᛅ /n/ = variant of ᛚ → Ú ~ ᛅ (more stylized) i /i/ = /i/ y /y/ = regular < + retrograde > (cf. Venetic ᚲᚲ, |ᚲ = ii, like uu > w) I /æ/ = ᛚ ‘a’ + crossbar of Σ ᛖ ‘e’ p /p/ = variant on Gk. Π ‘pi’ (stylized) z ᛦ /z/ = cf. Proto-Sinaitic M ‘ṣa(d)’ (many East Greek variants, all sibilants) s ᛊ /s/ = variants of ancient Gk. ᛊ Σ ‘sigma’ t /t/ = old variant of Τ ‘tau’ b Ç /b/ = reduplicated from NW Semitic / archaic Gk. W / ¢ ~ B / Ç e Π /e/ = rotated Σ = E The Runic Alphabet 5 m /m/ = stylized M l t /l/ = standard archaic Greek variant of Λ ‘lambda’ N /ŋ/ = regular + retrograde Γ ‘gamma’: Gk./Goth. convention gg = [ŋ(g)] o /o/ = Gk. Ω ‘omega’ d /d/ = reduplicated Δ ‘delta’ It is of some interest that all of the voiced stops are formally reduplicated (cf. Griffiths 1999). Select references ANTONSEN, ELMER H. (2002). Runes and Germanic Linguistics. Mouton: Walter de Gruyter. _________ (1990). Review of Elliott (1989). German Studies Review 13: 313–15. ELLIOTT, RALPH W. V. (1989). Runes: An Introduction. 2nd edn. New York: St. Martin’s. GRIFFITHS, ALAN (1999). ‘The Fuþark (and Ogam): Order as a Key to Origin’. Indogermanische Forschungen 104: 164–210. MILLER, D. GARY (1994). Ancient Scripts and Phonological Knowledge (ch. 5 ‘The Runic Alphabet’). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. MOLTKE, ERIK (1985). Runes and Their Origin, Denmark and Elsewhere.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ABSTRACT Savannah Dehart. BRACTEATES AS INDICATORS OF
    ABSTRACT Savannah DeHart. BRACTEATES AS INDICATORS OF NORTHERN PAGAN RELIGIOSITY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES. (Under the direction of Michael J. Enright) Department of History, May 2012. This thesis investigates the religiosity of some Germanic peoples of the Migration period (approximately AD 300-800) and seeks to overcome some difficulties in the related source material. The written sources which describe pagan elements of this period - such as Tacitus’ Germania, Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People, and Paul the Deacon’s History of the Lombards - are problematic because they were composed by Roman or Christian authors whose primary goals were not to preserve the traditions of pagans. Literary sources of the High Middle Ages (approximately AD 1000-1400) - such as The Poetic Edda, Snorri Sturluson’s Prose Edda , and Icelandic Family Sagas - can only offer a clearer picture of Old Norse religiosity alone. The problem is that the beliefs described by these late sources cannot accurately reflect religious conditions of the Early Middle Ages. Too much time has elapsed and too many changes have occurred. If literary sources are unavailing, however, archaeology can offer a way out of the dilemma. Rightly interpreted, archaeological evidence can be used in conjunction with literary sources to demonstrate considerable continuity in precisely this area of religiosity. Some of the most relevant material objects (often overlooked by scholars) are bracteates. These coin-like amulets are stamped with designs that appear to reflect motifs from Old Norse myths, yet their find contexts, including the inhumation graves of women and hoards, demonstrate that they were used during the Migration period of half a millennium earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy L. Wicker and Henrik Williams. Futhark 3
    Futhark International Journal of Runic Studies Main editors James E. Knirk and Henrik Williams Assistant editor Marco Bianchi Vol. 3 · 2012 © Contributing authors 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ All articles are available free of charge at http://www.futhark-journal.com A printed version of the issue can be ordered through http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-194111 Editorial advisory board: Michael P. Barnes (University College London), Klaus Düwel (University of Göttingen), Lena Peterson (Uppsala University), Marie Stoklund (National Museum, Copenhagen) Typeset with Linux Libertine by Marco Bianchi University of Oslo Uppsala University ISSN 1892-0950 Bracteates and Runes Review article by Nancy L. Wicker and Henrik Williams Die Goldbrakteaten der Völkerwanderungszeit — Auswertung und Neufunde. Eds. Wilhelm Heizmann and Morten Axboe. Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 40. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2011. 1024 pp., 102 plates. ISBN 978-3-11-022411-5, e-ISBN 978-3-11-022411-2, ISSN 1866-7678. 199.95 €, $280. From the Migration Period we now have more than a thousand stamped gold pendants known as bracteates. They have fascinated scholars since the late seventeenth century and continue to do so today. Although bracteates are fundamental sources for the art history of the period, and important archae- o logical artifacts, for runologists their inscriptions have played a minor role in comparison with other older-futhark texts. It is to be hoped that this will now change, however.
    [Show full text]
  • Context Analysis and Bracteate Inscriptions in Light of Alternative Iconographic Interpretations
    Context analysis and bracteate inscriptions in light of alternative iconographic interpretations Nancy L. Wicker Although nearly 1000 Scandinavian Migration Period (fifth- and sixth-century) gold pendants called bracteates have been discovered in Scandinavia and throughout northern and central Europe, only about twenty percent of these objects have inscriptions. The writing is mostly in the elder futhark but also in corrupted Latin copied from inscriptions on Late Roman coins and medallions, which are presumably the models for bracteate imagery. Relatively few of the 170 bracteates with runic inscriptions—which are known from only 110 different dies (Düwel 2008: 46)—are semantically meaningful. While the research of the late Karl Hauck has dominated bracteate scholarship for the past forty years, his theory of bracteate iconography is not the only possible interpretation of this imagery that may illuminate our understanding of the inscriptions. In this paper, I will high- light other interpretations of bracteates, not as definitive answers to the meaning of bracteates but instead to emphasize the tenuous nature of all such theories. I also propose the use of what Michaela Helmbrecht (2008) has termed ‗context analysis‘ to focus on the various contexts in which bracteates have been discovered in order to shed additional light upon their meaning. Before presenting alternate explanations, I will review basic information about bracteates and their inscriptions, and I will summarize the basic tenets of Hauck‘s thesis. Bracteate classification and iconography From the earliest research on bracteates, scholars including C. J. Thomsen (1855), Oscar Montelius (1869), and Bernhard Salin (1895) focused on organizing these artifacts by classi- fying them into types according to details of images depicted in the central stamped field of decoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Viking Art, Snorri Sturluson and Some Recent Metal Detector Finds. Fornvännen 113
    •• JOURNAL OF SWEDISH ANTIQUARIAN RESEARCH 2018:1 Art. Pentz 17-33_Layout 1 2018-02-16 14:37 Sida 17 Viking art, Snorri Sturluson and some recent metal detector finds By Peter Pentz Pentz, P., 2018. Viking art, Snorri Sturluson and some recent metal detector finds. Fornvännen 113. Stockholm. This paper seeks to contribute to a recent debate on the use of private metal detect- ing and its value within archaeology. Specifically it explores – by presenting some recently found Viking Period artefacts from Denmark – how private metal detect- ing can contribute to our understanding of Viking minds. By bringing together the myths as related by Snorri Sturluson in the early 13th century with the artefacts, I argue that thanks to private metal detecting through the last decades, our ability to recognise Viking art as narrative art has improved substantially. Peter Pentz, National Museum of Denmark, Ny Vestergade 10, DK–1471 København K [email protected] Over 60 years ago, Thorkild Ramskou (1953) the main problems in understanding Viking art described Viking art as almost exclusively deco- is the scarcity of reference materials. We largely rative, only functioning as a covering for plain know Norse mythology and its narratives through surfaces. In the rare cases where it was represen- Medieval Christian authors, in particular Snorri. tative, quality was poor. Viking artists, he stated, Hence, the myths have come down to us biased, preferred to portray scenes from myths of the reinterpreted and even now and then propagan- gods and heroic legends. Such scenes functioned dised. Furthermore, what survived is only a selec- as mnemonics; for the viewer they would recall tion.
    [Show full text]
  • New Bracteate Finds from Early Anglo-Saxon England by CHARLOTTE BEHR1
    Medieval Archaeology, 54, 2010 New Bracteate Finds from Early Anglo-Saxon England By CHARLOTTE BEHR1 THE NUMBER OF bracteate finds from early Anglo-Saxon England has increased substan- tially in recent years. A catalogue draws together for the first time all the finds since 1993 and one, possibly two, dies with bracteate motifs. This leads to a review of their find circum- stances, distribution and their stylistic and iconographical links with continental and Scandi- navian bracteates. The outcome is a revised picture of the function and meaning of bracteates in Anglo-Saxon society, with the suggestion that the English adopted the idea for these pendants from Sievern in Germany but adapted the concept and iconography for local manufacture. In Kent use links to high-status female burials but outside Kent ritual deposition is also a possibility. With over 980 objects, mostly from Scandinavia, bracteates form one of the largest find groups in 5th- and 6th-century northern European archaeology. Examples from the early Anglo-Saxon period are yet another find group that has in recent years increased considerably thanks to metal-detector finds and their systematic recording in the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) and the Treasure Annual Reports (TAR). Archaeological excavations have also contri- buted several new finds.2 Bracteates are round pendants usually made out of gold foil, occasionally silver or bronze foil, with a stamped central image. Dated to the second half of the 5th and first half of the 6th centuries, they were looped and worn on necklaces. The central image was figurative showing either one or more animals or an anthropomorphic head or figure often together with animals.3 Depending on the size of the metal sheet, one or more concentric rings, sometimes decorated with individual geometrical stamps, surround the image.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon Runes
    Runes Each rune can mean something in divination (fortune telling) but they also act as a phonetic alphabet. This means that they can sound out words. When writing your name or whatever in runes, don’t pay attention to the letters we use, but rather the sounds we use to make up the words. Then finds the runes with the closest sounds and put them together. Anglo- Swedo- Roman Germanic Danish Saxon Norwegian A ansuz ac ar or god oak-tree (?) AE aesch ash-tree A/O or B berkanan bercon or birch-twig (?) C cen torch D dagaz day E ehwaz horse EA ear earth, grave(?) F fehu feoh fe fe money, cattle, money, money, money, wealth property property property gyfu / G gebo geofu gift gift (?) G gar spear H hagalaz hail hagol (?) I isa is iss ice ice ice Ï The sound of this character was something ihwaz / close to, but not exactly eihwaz like I or IE. yew-tree J jera year, fruitful part of the year K kenaz calc torch, flame (?) (?) K name unknown L laguz / laukaz water / fertility M mannaz man N naudiz need, necessity, nou (?) extremity ing NG ingwaz the god the god "Ing" "Ing" O othala- hereditary land, oethil possession OE P perth-(?) peorth meaning unclear (?) R raidho reth (?) riding, carriage S sowilo sun or sol (?) or sun tiwaz / teiwaz T the god Tiw (whose name survives in Tyr "Tuesday") TH thurisaz thorn thurs giant, monster (?) thorn giant, monster U uruz ur wild ox (?) wild ox W wunjo joy X Y yr bow (?) Z agiz(?) meaning unclear Now write your name: _________________________________________________________________ Rune table borrowed from: www.cratchit.org/dleigh/alpha/runes/runes.htm .
    [Show full text]
  • Signs and Symbols Represented in Germanic, Particularly Early Scandinavian, Iconography Between the Migration Period and the End of the Viking Age
    Signs and symbols represented in Germanic, particularly early Scandinavian, iconography between the Migration Period and the end of the Viking Age Peter R. Hupfauf Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Sydney, 2003 Preface After the Middle Ages, artists in European cultures concentrated predominantly on real- istic interpretations of events and issues and on documentation of the world. From the Renaissance onwards, artists developed techniques of illusion (e.g. perspective) and high levels of sophistication to embed messages within decorative elaborations. This develop- ment reached its peak in nineteenth century Classicism and Realism. A Fine Art interest in ‘Nordic Antiquity’, which emerged during the Romantic movement, was usually expressed in a Renaissance manner, representing heroic attitudes by copying Classical Antiquity. A group of nineteenth-century artists, including Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Holman Hunt and Everett Millais founded the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. John Ruskin, who taught aesthetic theory at Oxford, became an associate and public defender of the group. The members of this group appreciated the symbolism and iconography of the Gothic period. Rossetti worked together with Edward Burne-Jones and William Morris. Morris was a great admirer of early Scandinavian cultures, and his ideas were extremely influential for the development of the English Craft Movement, which originated from Pre-Raphaelite ideology. Abstraction, which developed during the early twentieth century, attempted to communicate more directly with emotion rather then with the intellect. Many of the early abstract artists (Picasso is probably the best known) found inspiration in tribal artefacts. However, according to Rubin (1984), some nineteenth-century primitivist painters appreciated pre-Renaissance European styles for their simplicity and sincerity – they saw value in the absence of complex devices of illusio-nist lighting and perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Meanings of the Elder Futhark Runes
    Meanings of the Elder Futhark Runes Fehu (F: Domestic cattle, wealth.) Possessions won or earned, earned income, luck. Abundance, financial strength in the present or near future. Sign of hope and plenty, success and happiness. Social success. Energy, foresight, fertility, creation/destruction (becoming). Fehu Reversed or Merkstave: Loss of personal property, esteem, or something that you put in effort to keep. It indicates some sort of failure. Greed, burnout, atrophy, discord. Cowardice, stupidity, dullness, poverty, slavery, bondage. Uruz: (U: Auroch, a wild ox.) Physical strength and speed, untamed potential. A time of great energy and health. Freedom, energy, action, courage, strength, tenacity, understanding, wisdom. Sudden or unexpected changes (usually for the better). Sexual desire, masculine potency. The shaping of power and pattern, formulation of the self. Uruz Reversed or Merkstave: Weakness, obsession, misdirected force, domination by others. Sickness, inconsistency, ignorance. Lust, brutality, rashness, callousness, violence. Thurisaz: (TH: Thorn or a Giant.) Reactive force, directed force of destruction and defense, conflict. Instinctual will, vital eroticism, regenerative catalyst. A tendency toward change. Catharsis, purging, cleansing fire. Male sexuality, fertilization. (Thorr, the Thunder god, was of Giant stock.)Thurisaz Reversed or Merkstave: Danger, defenselessness, compulsion, betrayal, dullness. Evil, malice, hatred, torment, spite, lies. A bad man or woman. Rape? Ansuz: (A: The As, ancestral god, i.e. Odin.) A revealing message or insight, communication. Signals, inspiration, enthusiasm, speech, true vision, power of words and naming. Blessings, the taking of advice. Good health, harmony, truth, wisdom. Ansuz Reversed or Merkstave: Misunderstanding, delusion, manipulation by others, boredom. Vanity and grandiloquence. (Odin is a mighty, but duplicitous god.
    [Show full text]
  • Elder Futhark Rune Poem and Some Notes RYKHART: ODINSXRAL
    Elder Futhark Rune Poem and some notes RYKHART: ODINSXRAL Dedication Mysteries ancient, Allfather found Wrested from anguish, nine days fast bound Hung from the world tree, pierced by the spear Odin who seized them, make these staves clear 1 Unless otherwise specified, all text and artwork within ELDER FUTHARK RUNE POEM and some notes RYKHART: ODINSXRAL are copyright by the author and is not to be copied or reproduced in any medium or form without the express written permission of the author Reikhart Odinsthrall both Reikhart Odinsthrall and RYKHART: ODINSXRAL are also both copyright Dec 31, 2013 Elder Futhark Rune Poem by Reikhart Odinsthrall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://odinsthrall.co.uk/rune-poem.html. 2 F: Fehu : Cattle / Wealth Wealth is won and gold bestowed But honour's due to all men owed Gift the given and ware the lord For thy name's worth noised abroad U: Uruz : Aurochs / Wild-ox Wild ox-blood proud, sharp hornéd might On moorland harsh midst sprite and wight Unconquered will and fierce in form Through summer's sun and winter's storm X: Thurisaz : Thorn / Giant / Thor Thorn hedge bound the foe repelled A giant's anger by Mjolnir felled Thor protect us, fight for troth In anger true as Odin's wrath A: Ansuz : As / God / Odin In mead divine and written word In raven's call and whisper heard Wisdom seek and wise-way act In Mimir's well see Odin's pact R: Raidho : Journey / Carriage By horse and wheel to travel far Till journey's
    [Show full text]
  • Using Bracteates As Evidence for Long-Distance Contacts
    Using bracteates as evidence for long-distance contacts Charlotte Behr Roehampton University Introduction together with other bracteates, other pendants or beads' With more than 900 finds they form one of the largest The study of golden pendants, so-called bracteates, can find groups in migration-period northern European contribute to the understanding of long-distance contacts archaeology. Currently about 620 different die images are in northern, western and central Europe in the 5th and 6th known mostly from one bracteate but also from series centuries. It is well known from the extensive with up to 14 die-identical bracteates' The central archaeological record that the countries north and east of images of the pendants have always a diameter of the Roman Empire were far from being isolated from the between 2 and ·2.5 cm. Some were stamped on a larger networks of trade and exchange in the Roman Empire disk and the central image was surrounded by one or and beyond, links that often survived the end of the more concentric rings that were decorated with individual western Roman Empire in the 5th century. Among the stamps usually with geometric designs and sometimes numerous finds made in northern and central Europe that small images of animals or anthropomorphic heads. In belonged predominantly to a sphere of wealth and luxury some instances it is possible to show that the same stamp were Roman coins, glass vessels, bronze pots, precious was used in the border zone on two different bracteates.6 and semi-precious stones, even a Buddha statue was The edge of the disk was surrounded with gold wire and a found on the island of Helga in the Malaren area.' loop was attached.
    [Show full text]
  • FREE Elder Futhark Norse Runes Guide
    Elder Futhark Norse Runes Guide Rune Casting and Reading Elder Futhark Norse Runes Guide This guide is designed to be printed as a booklet, and used in conjunction with a rune set. If you don’t have your own, download FREE printable rune tokens from Spiritlore. Index Quick Index ................................................................................................. 2-3 The Aettir ...................................................................................................... 4 Rune Casting ............................................................................................... 5-7 Single Draw ................................................................................................. 5 Past, Present, Future .................................................................................. 5 Rune Toss ................................................................................................... 6 Rune Chart................................................................................................... 7 Rune Meanings ......................................................................................... 8-20 Freyja’s Aett ............................................................................................ 8-11 Heimdall’s Aett ...................................................................................... 12-15 Tyr’s Aett ............................................................................................... 16-19 Thank You ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy L. Wicker. Futhark 5
    Bracteate Inscriptions and Context Analysis in the Light of Alternatives to Hauck’s Iconographic Interpretations Nancy L. Wicker Abstract Runic inscriptions on Scandinavian Migration Period gold bracteates have long been considered problematic. Although many of them are readable, only a few are interpretable. One of the major questions about bracteate texts is whether they are related to the images depicted on the pieces. During the past quarter century, these inscriptions have been interpreted chiefly on the basis of Karl Hauck’s identification of the major figure depicted on bracteates as Odin. However, there are other interpretations of the pictures that may also assist our understanding of the texts. This paper examines some of these alternative explanations of bracteate imagery, with particular reference to how the objects were used and by whom, the aim being to arrive at a better understanding of the inscriptions. Keywords: bracteates, Migration Period, older runic inscriptions, iconography, imagery nscriptions are not essential to Scandinavian Migration Period (fifth- Iand sixth-century) bracteates, yet writing in some form appears on about twenty per cent of these gold pendants, which have been discovered in Scandi navia and throughout northern and central Europe. According to Morten Axboe’s list of December 2010, 1003 bracteates were then known, including 222 with inscriptions from a total of 153 unique dies (2011, Wicker, Nancy L. “Bracteate Inscriptions and Context Analysis in the Light of Alternatives to Hauck’s Iconographic Interpretations.” Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies 5 (2014, publ. 2015): 25–43. © 2015 Nancy L. Wicker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
    [Show full text]