Which Kremligarchs Should Be Sanctioned by the Biden Administration? 1 CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Which Kremligarchs Should Be Sanctioned by the Biden Administration? 1 CONTENTS Which Kremligarchs Should Be Sanctioned by the Biden Administration? 1 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Criteria for selection 4 Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman 5 Iskander Makhmudov and Andrey Bokarev 11 Dmitry Rybolovlev 14 Mikhail Gutseriev 19 Ruben Vardanyan 20 Alexander Vinokurov 24 Annex: need for a new term "kremligarch" 28 2 WHICH KREMLIGARCHS SHOULD BE SANCTIONED BY THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION? Introduction This report is an investigative and reference completely on the Kremlin’s hook. Kremligarchs study, based on open and verifiable have their overwhelming allegiance to Putin information, which offers the latest and his closest circle. recommendations for individual sanctions on the key “oligarchs” close to Vladimir Putin and Kremligarchs is a more relevant new his regime. The report argues these individuals, term than “oligarchs”, it shows a total who I prefer to call “kremligarchs”, should be predominance of Putin and Kremlin over added to the US Treasury sanctions’ lists due all aspects of business in Russia. to their close involvement in the Kremlin’s infrastructure designed to harm the US and its The new administration is in the White House allies. and exercising democratic control over both chambers of Congress. Now is an appropriate The term “oligarchs” is put above in inverted time to update and evaluate options for commas because it is outdated, something further sanctions under existing and proposed that I have been suggesting for a long time legislation. I strongly believe that a few dozen now1. An annex to this report provides a kremligarchs constitute the backbone of Putin’s detailed explanation why kremligarch is a network aimed against the West, but also much more relevant new term. It will be represent his regime’s big vulnerability. Key immediately understood by those who monitor Russian opposition figures are now urging the developments in Putin’s Russia. In short, West to sanction major Russian businessmen “oligarch” conveys a sense of independent (and they are overwhelmingly men).2 With the wealth, ownership of a genuine private recent arrest of Alexey Navalny, a key opposition business in an economy where at least basic figure who supports such sanctions, there market forces and private ownership exist are even more reasons to review and expand thanks to judicial power that is at least partly US sanctions against the Kremlin’s repressive independent. regime.3 Considerable parts of this report are based on Navalny's team investigations4. None of these conditions are any longer present under Putin. Kremligarch serves as a Notably, this report is complimentary to other better reflection of today’s Russian business ongoing efforts by Russian opposition and environment where all wealth handlers are civil society organizations to add different sets tied to the Kremlin administration and state of officials and businessmen to US sanctions. favors are allocated between these handlers. What matters to me is that not all kremligarchs Meanwhile the economy has become almost can be sanctioned without economic entirely based on corrupt monopolies, there is repercussions in the West. I have pragmatically virtually no economic independence nor basic chosen key individuals important to Putin’s defense of private property. Kremligarch is a subversive foreign policy but who are also low person then who may appear to be a wealthy “tycoon” perhaps, in the West, but in reality, is 2 https://www.rferl.org/a/navalny-calls-on-eu-to-target- russian-oligarchs-with-sanctions/30972213.html 1 https://martenscentre.eu/sites/default/files/publication- 3 https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/17/biden-national- files/russia-elections-russian-oligarchs.pdf; security-advisor-calls-for-russia-to-release-navalny.html https://www.c-span.org/video/?431597-1/helsinki-commission- 4 Including YouTube videos by Alexey Navalny, his eco- holds-discussion-russian-corruption nomic adviser Vladimir Milov and Perm region team Which Kremligarchs Should Be Sanctioned by the Biden Administration? 3 hanging fruit for the new US administration. In other words, they can be viably sanctioned Criteria for selection under existing legislation, such as the Countering America’s Adversaries Through The two basic criteria that I have used Sanctions Act (CAATSA), without risking any are derived from the Countering America’s serious impact on the US (as was not the case, Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) for example, with Oleg Deripaska and RUSAL, legislation. These constitute: which sparked a pushback from some US and EU steel partners of the Russian company5). a) proximity to Putin’s inner circle/involvement in his regime’s policy Many of the names mentioned are familiar figures in the sanctions debate. Some of the b) participation in the Kremlin’s subversive facts about the kremligarchs I list in my report activity against Western democratic are also not new, but perhaps have been institutions and interests neglected by US policy-makers. Nevertheless, Both of these criteria can still be broken into there have been significant developments sub-criteria, to give a precise and nuanced over the past eighteen months regarding definition of what proximity to Putin and most of these kremligarchs warranting wider 6 subversive activities in the West really mean. discussion about their activities. Below I In 2018 I discussed how these sub-criteria provide substantiated reasons for inclusion of could be defined and why CAATSA should the following eight kremligarchs for sanctions’ be considered as a watershed in sanctions review: criteria, especially as far as what we then • Petr Aven & Mikhail Fridman called “oligarchs”, are concerned.8 In short, those criteria provide more flexible ways for 7 • Iskander Makhmudov & Andrey Bokarev the US government to include a wider array • Dmitry Rybolovlev of Kremlin-connected “oligarchs” based on economic and political considerations and not • Mikhail Gutseriev just gross human rights violations, criminal • Ruben Vardanyan activity and involvement in Russia’s invasions of Ukraine and Georgia. Given the gravity of • Alexander Vinokurov Russian corruption and subversive activity with regards to US national security, the importance of such criteria should not be underestimated. Apart from CAATSA, recommendations from this report may be useful to US policy- makers considering sanctions against Kremlin networks under existing and pending legislation such as the Global Magnitsky Act and the Defending American Security from Kremlin Aggression Act (DASKA). Key findings of the report in terms of applicability of different criteria are summarized in the chart below. 5 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-17/ deripaska-s-rusal-role-spurred-europe-sanctions-warning-to-u-s 6 Some of the references in the footnotes are available only in Russian but can be read using Google translate. 7 I place the first four oligarchs in two pairs as they are 8 https://www.underminers.info/publications/2018/6/20/ closely aligned in their business and interaction with the Krem- report-by-i-zaslavskiy-and-s-stedman-on-interpreting-criteria- lin. for-sanctions-on-kremlin-oligarchs pp.4-6 4 Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman Aven/ Aven/ Reasons to be included under sanctions: Bokarev Fridman Gutseriev Vinokurov Vardanyan Rybolovlev Makhmudov/ Makhmudov/ • Proximity to Putin and Russian intelligence Proximity to • Funding of Russian defense industry and Putin/Kremlin strategic exports/trade through direct contacts and • • • • • • • Alleged corruption and corporate raiding inner circle • Undermining of Western institutions and Funding of security Russian defense • Attacks on American and Russian media industry and stra- tegic exports/trade • • In the West, Aven and Fridman are usually presented as founders of the Luxembourg and US-based company, Letter One, and as Alleged philanthropists. In Russia they are better known corruption • • • • • as the two main principals of Alfa Group, one Proximity to other of the largest privately owned investment consortiums in Russia. Multiple new interviews sanctioned indi- • • • • with well-connected sources in Putin’s People, viduals/entities the recent book by Reuters correspondent Undermining Catherine Belton, have provided additional of Western legal evidence that, from their student years, and 9 system and other throughout the Putin administration , Aven and • • • Fridman have been in close cooperation with institution the KGB and its successor the FSB.10 Facilitating US sanctions evasion • • • Support of Lukashenka • • Involved in disin- formation opera- tions in the West • • - requires more investigation by the US Government Petr Aven, Mikhail Fridman and Lord Browne. Source: L1 Group, 2015. CC 2.0 According to Belton’s account, Aven was sent to a KGB-friendly Austrian economic institute while Fridman engaged in black market operations while a member of Komsomol. Fridman’s company Alfa Eco, the precursor to today’s Alfa Group, was also assisted by the KGB in opening an export trading branch 9 Belton, C 2020, Putin's People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took On the West, First American edition, Far- rar, Straus and Giroux, New York, p.70 and pp. 189-190 10 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374238711 Which Kremligarchs Should Be Sanctioned by the Biden Administration? 5 in Switzerland, one of the first of its kind11. out a corporate raid against Russia’s third Belton also provides new material about how largest oil company TNK-BP. This was done Aven shielded Vladimir Putin from criminal at the enormous expense of US
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Economic Model of a Professional Football Club in France
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository Chapter 2 Economic model of a professional football club in France Nicolas Scelles and Wladimir Andreff The economic model of football clubs is a revenue model but also a cost model in relation to their objective. It can be defined as the search for balance between revenues, costs and objective, and the latter can vary: profit maximization, sporting maximization under strict constraint (“hard” constraint), or “soft” budget constraint (Andreff, 2009). In France, the revenue model of football clubs has evolved with time. This mutation fits in the switch from an SSSL (Spectators-Subventions-Sponsors- Local) model to an MMMMG (Media-Magnats-Merchandising-Markets-Global) model at the European level (Andreff & Staudohar, 2000). Before 1914, sport financing came mainly from practitioners (Bourg et Gouguet, 2001, p. 19). Thereafter, with competitions as spectacle, spectators have become the primary source of revenue, ahead of the subsidies granted by the local authorities and industry patrons. Advertising revenues have gradually become more and more important and, in the 1960s and 1970s, sponsorship increased significantly as firms were seeking more direct identification in terms of audience, image, reputation and sales (Andreff et Staudohar, 2000, p. 259) . In France, during the 1970s, operating revenues of first division football clubs came mainly from the spectators, supplemented by subsidies and sponsorship. The SSSL model was at its peak, with its “L” finding its justification in the fact that the revenues were generated from local or national residents. The 1980s is the starting point of a continuous increase in the share of TV rights income for French clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Killing of William Browder
    THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER Bill Browder, the fa lse crusader for justice and human rights and the self - styled No. 1 enemy of Vladimir Putin has perpetrated a brazen and dangerous deception upon the Weste rn world. This book traces the anatomy of this deception, unmasking the powerful forces that are pushing the West ern world toward yet another great war with Russia. ALEX KRAINER EQUILIBRIUM MONACO First published in Monaco in 20 17 Copyright © 201 7 by Alex Krainer ISBN 978 - 2 - 9556923 - 2 - 5 Material contained in this book may be reproduced with permission from its author and/or publisher, except for attributed brief quotations Cover page design, content editing a nd copy editing by Alex Krainer. Set in Times New Roman, book title in Imprint MT shadow To the people of Russia and the United States wh o together, hold the keys to the future of humanity. Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like the evil spirits at the dawn of day. Thomas Jefferson Table of Contents 1. Bill Browder and I ................................ ................................ ............... 1 Browder’s 2005 presentation in Monaco ................................ .............. 2 Harvard club presentation in 2010 ................................ ........................ 3 Ru ssophobia and Putin - bashing in the West ................................ ......... 4 Red notice ................................ ................................ ............................ 6 Reading
    [Show full text]
  • NOVATEK RS Presentation
    “Harnessing the Energy of the Far North” Mark Gyetvay, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board Alexander Palivoda, Head of Investor Relations Goldman Sachs Global Natural Resources Conference London 11-12 November 2015 Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements in this presentation are not historical facts and are “forward-looking”. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: – projections or expectations of revenues, income (or loss), earnings (or loss) per share, dividends, capital structure or other financial items or ratios; – statements of our plans, objectives or goals, including those related to products or services; – statements of future economic performance; and – statements of assumptions underlying such statements Words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “estimates”, “intends”, “plans”, “outlook” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. You should be aware that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements When relying on forward-looking statements, you should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and events, especially in light of the political, economic, social and legal environment in which we operate. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russia You Never Met
    The Russia You Never Met MATT BIVENS AND JONAS BERNSTEIN fter staggering to reelection in summer 1996, President Boris Yeltsin A announced what had long been obvious: that he had a bad heart and needed surgery. Then he disappeared from view, leaving his prime minister, Viktor Cher- nomyrdin, and his chief of staff, Anatoly Chubais, to mind the Kremlin. For the next few months, Russians would tune in the morning news to learn if the presi- dent was still alive. Evenings they would tune in Chubais and Chernomyrdin to hear about a national emergency—no one was paying their taxes. Summer turned to autumn, but as Yeltsin’s by-pass operation approached, strange things began to happen. Chubais and Chernomyrdin suddenly announced the creation of a new body, the Cheka, to help the government collect taxes. In Lenin’s day, the Cheka was the secret police force—the forerunner of the KGB— that, among other things, forcibly wrested food and money from the peasantry and drove some of them into collective farms or concentration camps. Chubais made no apologies, saying that he had chosen such a historically weighted name to communicate the seriousness of the tax emergency.1 Western governments nod- ded their collective heads in solemn agreement. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank both confirmed that Russia was experiencing a tax collec- tion emergency and insisted that serious steps be taken.2 Never mind that the Russian government had been granting enormous tax breaks to the politically connected, including billions to Chernomyrdin’s favorite, Gazprom, the natural gas monopoly,3 and around $1 billion to Chubais’s favorite, Uneximbank,4 never mind the horrendous corruption that had been bleeding the treasury dry for years, or the nihilistic and pointless (and expensive) destruction of Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the Registrar of the Company and the Acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel
    Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the registrar of the Company and the acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel IRC – R.O.S.T. (former R.O.S.T. Registrar merged with Independent Registrar Company in February 2019) was established in 1996. In 2003–2015, Independent Registrar Company was a member of Computershare Group, a global leader in registrar and transfer agency services. In July 2015, IRC changed its ownership to pass into the control of a group of independent Russian investors. In December 2016, R.O.S.T. Registrar and Independent Registrar Company, both owned by the same group of independent investors, formed IRC – R.O.S.T. Group of Companies. In 2018, Saint Petersburg Central Registrar joined the Group. In February 2019, Independent Registrar Company merged with IRC – R.O.S.T. Ultimate beneficiaries of IRC – R.O.S.T. Group are individuals with a strong background in business management and stock markets. No beneficiary holds a blocking stake in the Group. In accordance with indefinite License No. 045-13976-000001, IRC – R.O.S.T. keeps records of holders of registered securities. Services offered by IRC – R.O.S.T. to its clients include: › Records of shareholders, interestholders, bondholders, holders of mortgage participation certificates, lenders, and joint property owners › Meetings of shareholders, joint owners, lenders, company members, etc. › Electronic voting › Postal and electronic mailing › Corporate consulting › Buyback of securities, including payments for securities repurchased › Proxy solicitation › Call centre services › Depositary and brokerage, including escrow agent services IRC – R.O.S.T. Group invests a lot in development of proprietary high-tech solutions, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Billionaire Rybolovlev Sues Sotheby's for $380M in Fraud
    AiA Art News-service Russian billionaire Rybolovlev sues Sotheby’s for $380m in fraud damages The mega-collector’s latest lawsuit, filed in New York, escalates his three-year legal feud with Swiss dealer Yves Bouvier MARGARET CARRIGAN 3rd October 2018 20:38 GMT Rybolovlev served Sotheby's with a $380m suit in a New York federal court despite a similar pending case in Geneva Francknataf The ongoing and vitriolic battle between the Russian fertiliser billionaire turned art collector Dmitry Rybolovlev and Yves Bouvier, an entrepreneurial Swiss art dealer and freeport magnate, reached dramatic new heights on Tuesday (2 October) when Rybolovlev filed a $380m lawsuit against Sotheby’s in a Manhattan federal court. The charges are brought by two of Rybolovlev’s companies and claim that the auction house materially assisted what the collector refers to as the “largest art fraud in history”, as first reported by Bloomberg. It is the latest attempt by the Russian oligarch to recoup $1bn from Bouvier after first claiming in 2015 that he was overcharged by the dealer on 38 works of art purchased for a total of $2bn over the course of a decade, among them Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi. Sotheby’s was involved in the sale of 14 of the works in question. According to the court papers, Bouvier “masterminded” the fraud by acquiring the paintings at lower prices than he represented before selling them to Rybolovlev at unduly marked up rates, fraudulently pocketing millions for himself. Sotheby’s, the complaint contends, knowingly and intentionally bolstered the plaintiffs’ “trust and confidence in Bouvier and rendered the whole edifice of fraud plausible and credible” by brokering certain sales and inflated valuations.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence
    N°70 - January 31 2008 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS SPOTLIGHT P. 1-3 Politics & Government c Medvedev’s Last Battle Before Kremlin Debut SPOTLIGHT c Medvedev’s Last Battle The arrest of Semyon Mogilevich in Moscow on Jan. 23 is a considerable development on Russia’s cur- Before Kremlin Debut rent political landscape. His profile is altogether singular: linked to a crime gang known as “solntsevo” and PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS sought in the United States for money-laundering and fraud, Mogilevich lived an apparently peaceful exis- c Final Stretch for tence in Moscow in the renowned Rublyovka road residential neighborhood in which government figures « Operation Succession » and businessmen rub shoulders. In truth, however, he was involved in at least two types of business. One c Kirillov, Shestakov, was the sale of perfume and cosmetic goods through the firm Arbat Prestige, whose manager and leading Potekhin: the New St. “official” shareholder is Vladimir Nekrasov who was arrested at the same time as Mogilevich as the two left Petersburg Crew in Moscow a restaurant at which they had lunched. The charge that led to their incarceration was evading taxes worth DIPLOMACY around 1.5 million euros and involving companies linked to Arbat Prestige. c Balkans : Putin’s Gets His Revenge The other business to which Mogilevich’s name has been linked since at least 2003 concerns trading in P. 4-7 Business & Networks gas. As Russia Intelligence regularly reported in previous issues, Mogilevich was reportedly the driving force behind the creation of two commercial entities that played a leading role in gas relations between Russia, BEHIND THE SCENE Turkmenistan and Ukraine: EuralTransGaz first and then RosUkrEnergo later.
    [Show full text]
  • Treisman Silovarchs 9 10 06
    Putin’s Silovarchs Daniel Treisman October 2006, Forthcoming in Orbis, Winter 2007 In the late 1990s, many Russians believed their government had been captured by a small group of business magnates known as “the oligarchs”. The most flamboyant, Boris Berezovsky, claimed in 1996 that seven bankers controlled fifty percent of the Russian economy. Having acquired massive oil and metals enterprises in rigged privatizations, these tycoons exploited Yeltsin’s ill-health to meddle in politics and lobby their interests. Two served briefly in government. Another, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, summed up the conventional wisdom of the time in a 1997 interview: “Politics is the most lucrative field of business in Russia. And it will be that way forever.”1 A decade later, most of the original oligarchs have been tripping over each other in their haste to leave the political stage, jettisoning properties as they go. From exile in London, Berezovsky announced in February he was liquidating his last Russian assets. A 1 Quoted in Andrei Piontkovsky, “Modern-Day Rasputin,” The Moscow Times, 12 November, 1997. fellow media magnate, Vladimir Gusinsky, long ago surrendered his television station to the state-controlled gas company Gazprom and now divides his time between Israel and the US. Khodorkovsky is in a Siberian jail, serving an eight-year sentence for fraud and tax evasion. Roman Abramovich, Berezovsky’s former partner, spends much of his time in London, where he bought the Chelsea soccer club in 2003. Rather than exile him to Siberia, the Kremlin merely insists he serve as governor of the depressed Arctic outpost of Chukotka—a sign Russia’s leaders have a sense of humor, albeit of a dark kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Silence Factory
    Russia’s Silence Factory: The Kremlin’s Crackdown on Free Speech and Democracy in the Run-up to the 2021 Parliamentary Elections August 2021 Contact information: International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR) Rue Belliard 205, 1040 Brussels, Belgium [email protected] Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 II. INTRODUCTION 6 A. AUTHORS 6 B. OBJECTIVES 6 C. SOURCES OF INFORMATION AND METHODOLOGY 6 III. THE KREMLIN’S CRACKDOWN ON FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY 7 A. THE LEGAL TOOLKIT USED BY THE KREMLIN 7 B. 2021 TIMELINE OF THE CRACKDOWN ON FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY 9 C. KEY TARGETS IN THE CRACKDOWN ON FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY 12 i) Alexei Navalny 12 ii) Organisations and Individuals associated with Alexei Navalny 13 iii) Human Rights Lawyers 20 iv) Independent Media 22 v) Opposition politicians and pro-democracy activists 24 IV. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS TRIGGERED BY THE CRACKDOWN 27 A. FREEDOMS OF ASSOCIATION, OPINION AND EXPRESSION 27 B. FAIR TRIAL RIGHTS 29 C. ARBITRARY DETENTION 30 D. POLITICAL PERSECUTION AS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY 31 V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 37 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “An overdose of freedom is lethal to a state.” Vladislav Surkov, former adviser to President Putin and architect of Russia’s “managed democracy”.1 Russia is due to hold Parliamentary elections in September 2021. The ruling United Russia party is polling at 28% and is projected to lose its constitutional majority (the number of seats required to amend the Constitution).2 In a bid to silence its critics and retain control of the legislature, the Kremlin has unleashed an unprecedented crackdown on the pro-democracy movement, independent media, and anti-corruption activists.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA INTELLIGENCE Politics & Government
    N°66 - November 22 2007 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS KREMLIN P. 1-4 Politics & Government c KREMLIN The highly-orchestrated launching into orbit cThe highly-orchestrated launching into orbit of of the «national leader» the «national leader» Only a few days away from the legislative elections, the political climate in Russia grew particu- STORCHAK AFFAIR larly heavy with the announcement of the arrest of the assistant to the Finance minister Alexey Ku- c Kudrin in the line of fire of drin (read page 2). Sergey Storchak is accused of attempting to divert several dozen million dol- the Patrushev-Sechin clan lars in connection with the settlement of the Algerian debt to Russia. The clan wars in the close DUMA guard of Vladimir Putin which confront the Igor Sechin/Nikolay Patrushev duo against a compet- cUnited Russia, electoral ing «Petersburg» group based around Viktor Cherkesov, overflows the limits of the «power struc- home for Russia’s big ture» where it was contained up until now to affect the entire Russian political power complex. business WAR OF THE SERVICES The electoral campaign itself is unfolding without too much tension, involving men, parties, fac- cThe KGB old guard appeals for calm tions that support President Putin. They are no longer legislative elections but a sort of plebicite campaign, to which the Russian president lends himself without excessive good humour. The objec- PROFILE cValentina Matvienko, the tive is not even to know if the presidential party United Russia will be victorious, but if the final score “czarina” of Saint Petersburg passes the 60% threshhold.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreads VTB Sustainability Report 2019
    MAINTAINING A BALANCE OF INTERESTS SUSTAINABILITY REPORT | 2019 2 Contents Statement of Andrey Kostin, VTB for the environment 82 President and Chairman Financing environmental projects 83 of the Management Board 4 Environmental impact management 88 Charitable environmental projects 93 VTB Group in 2019 8 VTB for society 96 Values 9 VTB Group in 2019: key highliths 10 Managing sponsorship and charity projects 97 Credit ratings of VTB Bank 11 A Sporting Country 100 Patriotism and a Country of Traditions 104 A Cultured Country 105 About VTB Group 14 An Educated Country 108 A Country for Business 111 VTB Group – mission and vision 16 A Healthy Country 114 Reliability as a core value 18 Internal control and business ethics 21 CSR management 23 About the Report 116 Contributing to the UN Sustainable Development Goals 27 Scope of the Report 116 Stakeholder engagement 30 Approach to determining material topics 118 VTB for clients 36 Appendices 122 Support for socially important businesses Membership in business associations 122 and cooperation with governmental agencies 40 Abbreviations 124 Promoting small and medium GRI Standards reference table 125 enterprise development 48 Providing socially important retail services 52 Availability and quality of banking services 58 Contact information 130 VTB for employees 64 Personnel management 65 Talent training and development 68 Employee motivation and remuneration 74 Corporate culture and internal communications 76 Occupational health and safety 79 3 Sustainability Report / 2019 Statement of Andrey Kostin, President and Chairman of the Management Board Dear Reader, This integration dramatically improved our manageability During the year, we worked towards strengthening while benefiting clients.
    [Show full text]