Great and Spotted Bowerbirds Chlamydera Nucha/Is and C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great and Spotted Bowerbirds Chlamydera Nucha/Is and C VOL. 16 (2) JUNE 1995 49 AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1995, 16, 49-57 Great and Spotted Bowerbirds Chlamydera nucha/is and C. maculata (Ptilonorhynchidae) Sympatric and Interacting at Each Other's Bowers by CLIFFORD B. FRITH!, DAWN W. FRITH1 and MARNIE McCULLOUGH2 1'Prionodura', P.O. Box 581, Malanda, Queensland 4885 2 'Bruslee', P.O. Charters Towers, Queensland 4820 Summary An area of sympatry between bower-attending Great and Spotted Bowerbirds Ch/amydera nucha/is and C. maculata (Ptilonorhynchidae) in northern Queensland is described. Great Bowerbirds maintained bowers within little more than a kilometre of riverine vegetation and Spotted Bowerbirds mostly beyond this and in more arid habitat. The two species meet where the two favoured habitats abut and thus do so linearly either side of the major river system of the study area. The two closest pairs of bowers of each species were 1020 m and 1200 m apart. Spotted Bowerbirds visited bowers of, and displayed to, Great Bowerbirds, and the latter species visited bowers of the former. Photographic evidence is presented. Mean nearest-neighbour distance of 10 active Spotted Bowerbird bowers was 870 m (range 645-1170 m) and of nine Great Bowerbird bowers was 1370 m (range 825-1920 m). Introduction Records of sympatry between congeneric species of polygynous and bower-building bowerbird species (Ptilonorhynchidae) are few . The few records of sympatry between congeneric Australian bowerbird species involve only odd vagrant individuals within the peripheral range of another. In the case of polygynously breeding bowerbird species, sympatry of bower-attending congeneric males is unknown. Instances of sympatry are of interest as they may provide opportunities to examine the function of bower form, the influence of sympatry upon bower structures and upon the behaviour and reproduction of individuals and populations of bird taxa involved (Gilliard 1969, Frith 1970, Schodde & McKean 1973). The few such records are therefore briefly reviewed here. Gilliard (1969) observed two individual Yellow-breasted Bowerbirds Chlamydera lauterbachi visit an active bower of a Fawn-breasted Bowerbird C. cerviniventris at Aiome on the Ramu River in northern Papua New Guinea. One of the Yellow-breasted birds was seen to tear aggressively at the bower and to display to a female Fawn­ breasted Bowerbird. Bailey (1992) also noted sympatry in these two species on the Ramu River. It is probable these two bowerbirds are sympatrically breeding congeneric species in the Ramu River valley, but a bower of the former remains to be found there. These two bowerbirds have also both been recorded in the Aiyura Valley, Papua New Guinea, at c. 1700 rn above sea level (Doyle et al. 1981). Frith (1970) cited historical records of apparent sympatry between the otherwise mostly altitudinally isolated New Guinea Streaked Bowerbird Amblyomis subalaris and Macgregor's Bowerbird A. macgregoriae. The reliabilty of these data was questioned (LeCroy 1971, Bell 1972), but Schodde & McKean (1973) then reported the two species together in some areas and described a specimen suggestive of hybridisation between them. A second probable hybrid specimen between these two species was discovered as the present paper went to press (CBF & DWF unpubl. data). Roberts (1975) recorded a single Great Bowerbird C. nuchalis 'in open eucalypts along Portland Roads Road', an area of Cape York Peninsula, Queensland, where AUSTRALIAN 50 FRITH, FRITH & McCULLOUGH BIRD WATCHER Figure 1. Map of continental Australia showing approximate distributional range of Great and Spotted Bowerbirds, the black area indicating where they overlap (after Blakers et al. 1984). Fawn-breasted Bowerbirds reside. A Great Bowerbird was seen on 6 June 1983, several kilometres inland of Portland Roads, where Fawn-breasted Bowerbirds were common (Ray Pierce pers. comm.). A single vagrant Great Bowerbird was seen on 27 May 1987 at Trephina Gorge, N.T., where the Western Bowerbird C. guttata is a common resident; a recent cylone may have been responsible for the presence of this lone Great Bowerbird (Graham & Graham 1990). CBF and DWF have seen a Great Bowerbird near the Heathlands National Park ranger's residence in an area where the Fawn-breasted Bowerbird is resident (Irtgram 1993). The Great Bowerbird is by far the most extensively distributed bowerbird in Australia, being found throughout most of the tropics north of 20 os and a little to the south in the east. The Spotted Bowerbird C. maculata inhabits much of central New South Wales and Queensland north to the Townsville area in the east, and westward across Queensland to just into the Northern Territory. In the extreme north of its eastern and central Queensland range, non-breeding Spotted Bowerbirds have been reported within the range of the Great Bowerbird (Figure 1). For details of distributions and habitats of these bowerbirds see Gilliard (1969), Cooper & Forshaw (1977) and Blakers et al. (1984). The two species are geographical representatives of the Chlamydera superspecies. Defining points at which the Great and Spotted Bowerbirds most closely meet or replace each other in tropical Queensland has long interested ornithologists (Gilbert 1844 in Chisholm 1945, Elsey 1856 in Macdonald & Colston 1966, Marshall 1954). Parker (1968) reported them as sympatric, having seen a single Great Bowerbird at 'Glendower', on the Flinders River, near Hughenden, Queensland, where the Spotted Bowerbird was moderately common in riverine forest and adjacent woodland. In northern Queensland Andree Griffin (in litt.) observed a vagrant Great Bowerbird at Paluma, within the clearing in upland rainforest atop the Seaview Range occupied by the village, on 12 April 1989, and a vagrant Spotted Bowerbird there on 5 June 1993. Both birds were out of their species' known range and habitat. VOL. 16 (2) JUNE 1995 Great and Spotted Bowerbirds Sharing Bowers 51 N t 13 2 1 5 3 0 10 7 9 4 8 6 12 ------------------ '\:c.\\c.e kilometres Figure 2. Map showing area of sympatry between Great and Spotted Bowerbirds to south­ south-east of Charters Towers, north Queensland. Numbers = Spotted Bowerbird bowers; letters = Great Bowerbird bowers; square = location of homestead buildings. The extensive areas lacking bower plots were not searched. Note Spotted bower 9 replaced bower 8, and bower 15 was replaced by Great bower D. Blakers et al. (1984) presented maps of plotted sightings of both Great and Spotted Bowerbirds, indicating both to be present over a band of tropical Queensland some 600 km in length and 100 km broad, west-north-west of Proserpine and Mackay and extending to the Northern Territory border (Figure 1). These records apparently involved non-breeding (i.e. no bowers or nests reported) Great Bowerbirds at the extreme south of the species' range and into the range of the Spotted Bowerbird. There have been no records of breeding populations of any two congeneric bowerbird species being truly sympatric, that is with active bowers of both species within the same area. Methods In an attempt to discover an area of sympatry between the Great and Spotted Bowerbirds, CBF and DWF drove south-east from Charters Towers, Queensland, 20 °05 'S, 146 °16 'E (where the Great Bowerbird is common), to 'Cardigan' and 'Warrawee' stations on the Burdekin River c. 43 km from Charters Towers in September 1984. Here they found only Great Bowerbirds and their bowers. They then travelled to 'Bruslee', c. 100 km south-south-east of Charters Towers, where they first met MM who informed them that although all bowers she knew of on the McCullough property were of Spotted Bowerbirds, she had once seen a Great Bowerbird in the area. MM subsequently located a Great Bowerbird's bower (Figure 2, bower F) on the west bank of the Cape River. In September 1987 MM saw a Spotted Bowerbird visit this Great Bowerbird bower, where it spent two minutes within the avenue examining decorations before the calls of the returning Great Bowerbird caused it to leave. AUSTRALIAN 52 FRITH, FRITH & McCULLOUGH BIRD WATCHER As a result ofMM's latter observation, CBF and DWF made visits to 'Bruslee' during September­ November 1988, March-April and September 1989, July and September 1990 and August-September 1991. An extensive area of the property to either side of the normally dry Cape River bed, and immediately about and to the west of the homestead about the dry bed of Dish Creek, was searched for bowerbirds and their bowers. Twenty-seven Spotted Bowerbirds were captured near bowers and banded with metal bands (Australian Bird Banding Scheme) and 19 of them also with plastic colour bands. Three Great Bowerbirds were caught and metal-banded before release. Habitat away from the influence of tall dense riverine woodland on the Cape River was low open woodland dominated by acacias and eucalypts Yiith vine thickets where the Spotted Bowerbird was found nesting (Frith & Frith 1990). The understorey of this open woodland was dominated by Currant Bush Carissa lanceolata, beneath which most bowers of both species were found . Canvas hides were erected near several bowers, notably Spotted bowers 5, 10 and 12 and Great bowers A and F (Figure 2) and observations/photographs made at various times. Results We located and plotted 16 active bowers of the Spotted and nine of the Great Bowerbird (Figure 2). Although nine of the Spotted Bowerbird bowers were typical of the species in being almost, if not exclusively, of grass stems with their broad avenue floor at or almost at ground level (Plate 13, front cover), four were grass­ stem structures with modest to most substantial stick foundations to the lower outer walls with an avenue floor conspicuously above ground level (Plate 14). A minimum of nine concurrently active Spotted Bowerbird bowers was found in an area of little more than 7 km2 • The locations of all active Spotted and Oreat Bowerbird bowers are indicated in Figure 2 as a result of plotting them onto high­ quality aerial photographs.
Recommended publications
  • Variation in Bower Decorating Style Among Male Bowerbirds
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 83, pp. 3042-3046, May 1986 Population Biology Animal art: Variation in bower decorating style among male bowerbirds Amblyornis inornatus (cultural rnlsson/geographic variadon/behavior) JARED DIAMOND Physiology Department, University of California Medical School, Los Angeles, CA 90024 Contributed by Jared Diamond, December 30, 1985 ABSTRACT Courtship bowers of the bowerbird Ambly- BACKGROUND ornis inornatus, the most elaborately decorated structures Bowers are avenues, huts, or towers of sticks decorated with erected by an animal other than humans, vary geographically objects such as fruits, flowers, mushrooms, and stones. and individually. Bowers in the south Kumawa Mountains are Males often hold a decoration in their bill while displaying to tall towers of sticks glued together, resting on a circular mat of a female, and experiments confirm that bower structure and dead moss painted black, and decorated with dull objects such decorations influence females' choice of mate (7). Whereas as snall shells, acorns, and stones. Bowers in the Wandamen males are polygynous and contribute nothing to the female Mountains are low woven towers covered by a stick hut with an after copulation, females perform the whole effort ofbuilding entrance, resting on a green moss mat and decorated with a nest and rearing the young. Species comparisons show that colorful objects such as fruits, flowers, and butterfly wings. male bowerbirds with duller ornamental plumage build fan- Young males build simpler bowers, and adult males differ cier bowers (4, 8). Thus, during bowerbird evolution the among themselves. Experiments with poker chips of seven female's attention has been transferred from ornaments ofthe colors offered as decorations showed that individual birds male's body to those ofhis bower.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest, Egg, Incubation Behaviour and Parental Care in the Huon Bowerbird Amblyornis Germana
    Australian Field Ornithology 2019, 36, 18–23 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo36018023 Nest, egg, incubation behaviour and parental care in the Huon Bowerbird Amblyornis germana Richard H. Donaghey1, 2*, Donna J. Belder3, Tony Baylis4 and Sue Gould5 1Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111 QLD, Australia 280 Sawards Road, Myalla TAS 7325, Australia 3Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 4628 Utopia Road, Brooweena QLD 4621, Australia 5269 Burraneer Road, Coomba Park NSW 2428, Australia *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The Huon Bowerbird Amblyornis germana, recently elevated to species status, is endemic to montane forests on the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. The polygynous males in the Yopno Urawa Som Conservation Area build distinctive maypole bowers. We document for the first time the nest, egg, incubation behaviour, and parental care of this species. Three of the five nests found were built in tree-fern crowns. Nest structure and the single-egg clutch were similar to those of MacGregor’s Bowerbird A. macgregoriae. Only the female Huon Bowerbird incubated. Mean length of incubation sessions was 30.9 minutes and the number of sessions daily was 18. Diurnal incubation constancy over a 12-hour day was 74%, compared with a mean of ~70% in six other members of the bowerbird family. The downy nestling resembled that of MacGregor’s Bowerbird. Vocalisations of a female Huon Bowerbird at a nest with a nestling
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Evolution of Bower-Building Behavior in Two Groups of Bowerbirds Suggested by Phylogenomics
    SUPPLEMENT TO: Parallel Evolution of Bower-Building Behavior in Two Groups of Bowerbirds Suggested by Phylogenomics Per G.P. Ericson 1 *, Martin Irestedt 1, Johan A.A. Nylander 1, Les Christidis 2, Leo Joseph 3, Yanhua Qu 1, 4 * 1 Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden 2 School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia 3 Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 4 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China CONTENT 1. MATERIAL AND METHODS (DETAILED DESCRIPTION) 2. FURTHER DETAILS ABOUT SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIPS OBSERVED 3. DATA REPOSITORIES 4. SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES S1-S5 5. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES S1-S2 1. MATERIAL AND METHODS (DETAILED DESCRIPTION) Taxon Sampling In the study, we include all traditionally recognized bowerbird species as well as representatives for each of the morphologically and genetically distinct populations of the genus Ailuroedus that recently were elevated from status as subspecies to full species (Irestedt et al. 2016). The number of Ailuroedus species thus increased from the traditionally recognized three species (buccoides, crassirostris and melanotis; species epithets used for brevity when possible) to ten (buccoides, stonii, geislerorum, crassirostris, maculosus, melanocephalus, astigmaticus, arfakianus, jobiensis and melanotis). We used cryo-frozen tissue samples for most taxa, but for twelve individuals DNA was extracted from toe pad samples of museum study skins (Table S1 available on Dryad). We base our information on mating system, sexual plumage dimorphism, and building of courts and bowers on Gilliard (1969), Diamond (1986a), Kusmierski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Courtship Vocalizations As Cues for Mate Choice in the Satin Bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus Violaceus)
    MALE COURTSHIP VOCALIZATIONS AS CUES FOR MATE CHOICE IN THE SATIN BOWERBIRD (PTILONORHYNCHUS VIOLACEUS) CHRISTOPHER A. LOFFREDO AND GERALD BORGIA Departmentof Zoology,University of Maryland,College Park, Maryland 20742 USA AI3STRACT.--MaleSatin Bowerbirds(Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) court femalesat specialized structurescalled bowers. Courtship includes a complexpattern of vocalizationsin which a broad-band,mechanical-sounding song is followed by interspecificmimicry. We studiedthe effect of male courtshipdisplays on male mating successin Satin Bowerbirds.Data from 2 yearsof field researchshowed low between-maledifferences in mechanicalcomponents of courtshipsong and high variability betweenmales in mimeticsinging. Older malessang longer and higher-qualitybouts of mimicry than did youngermales. In one year, courtship song featureswere correlatedwith male mating success.The resultssuggest that female SatinBowerbirds use male courtship vocalizations in their mate-choicedecisions. We discuss hypothesesabout assessment of male age and dominancefrom courtshipvocalizations and suggestthat thesesongs have evolvedas a result of selectionfor male displaycharacteristics that provide femaleswith information about the relative quality of prospectivemates. Re- ceived27 June1985, accepted20 September1985. MALESatin Bowerbirds(Ptilonorhynchus vio- ingnessto copulateor by flying away. Given laceus)build specializedstructures called bow- the complexity of male display and the atten- ers that are used as sites for courting females tion femalespay to displayingmales,
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in and Around Blackall
    Birds in and around Blackall Apostle bird Eastern Rosella Red backed Kingfisher Australasian Grebe Emu Red-backed Fairy-wren Australasian Shoveler Eurasian Coot Red-breasted Button Quail Australian Bustard Forest Kingfisher Red-browed Pardalote Australian Darter Friary Martin Red-capped Robin Australian Hobby Galah Red-chested Buttonquail Australian Magpie Glossy Ibis Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo Australian Magpie-lark Golden-headed Cisticola Red-winged Parrot Australian Owlet-nightjar Great (Black) Cormorant Restless Flycatcher Australian Pelican Great Egret Richard’s Pipit Australian Pipit Grey (White) Goshawk Royal Spoonbill Australian Pratincole Grey Butcherbird Rufous Fantail Australian Raven Grey Fantail Rufous Songlark Australian Reed Warbler Grey Shrike-thrush Rufous Whistler Australian White Ibis Grey Teal Sacred Ibis Australian Ringneck (mallee form) Grey-crowned Babbler Sacred Kingfisher Australian Wood Duck Grey-fronted Honeyeater Singing Bushlark Baillon’s Crake Grey-headed Honeyeater Singing Honeyeater Banded Honeyeater Hardhead Southern Boobook Owl Barking Owl Hoary-headed Grebe Spinifex Pigeon Barn Owl Hooded Robin Spiny-cheeked Honeyeater Bar-shouldered Dove Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo Splendid Fairy-wren Black Falcon House Sparrow Spotted Bowerbird Black Honeyeater Inland Thornbill Spotted Nightjar Black Kite Intermediate Egret Square-tailed kite Black-chinned Honeyeater Jacky Winter Squatter Pigeon Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike Laughing Kookaburra Straw-necked Ibis Black-faced Woodswallow Little Black Cormorant Striated Pardalote
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Evolution of Reproductive Behavior (1St Lecture)
    Chapter 18 Evolution of reproductive behavior (1st lecture) The Satin Bowerbird has an unusual courtship ritual Male constructs an female elaborate “avenue” bower, contaiing colorful objects that he has collected. When a female arrives, he performs a energetic dance while emitting a medley of male buzzes, screeches and imitations of other bird songs. The female assesses the male based on: bower attributes, the male’s dance, and location of the bower If the female decides to mate with him, then she will enter his bower, copulate, and fly away, never to see him again. She will incubate her eggs and raise young on her own. The male will continue in this manner across the 8-month breeding season, mating with as many females as possible. The design of the bower varies greatly, both among and within species Playhouse bower Different populations of Amblyornis inoratus construct different types of bower, perhaps reflecting different “aesthetic tastes” of females within each population Maypole bower Evolutionary relationships among 14 of the 19 species of bowerbird, based on similarities in their mitochondrial cytochrome b gene Note that 2 bowerbird species share the ancestral trait of not building a bower Maypole builders Presumably, the hypothetical species Y built a Avenue simple bower. builders The ensuing adaptive radiation illustrates a fantastic example of divergent evolution What are the features of the bowerbird courtship ritual that represent evolutionary conundrums? The males make absolutely no parental investment Each male mates multiple
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries Version: June 2013 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 2 GROUND FEEDING BIRD STANDARDS 3 GROUND FEEDING BIRD HOUSING 3 H-1. Types of Space and Size 3 H-2. Containment 5 H-3. Ground and Plantings 6 H-4. Gates and Doors 7 H-5. Shelter 8 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 8 H-7. Sanitation 9 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 11 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION 12 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities 12 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing 13 PF-3. Life Support 13 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling 13 PF-5. Security: Avian Enclosures 14 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance 14 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring 15 PF-8. Insect and Rodent Control 15 PF-9. Record Keeping 16 PF-10. Animal Transport 16 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 18 N-1. Water 18 N-2. Diet 18 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 20 N-4. Food Storage 21 N-5. Food Handling 21 VETERINARY CARE 22 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 22 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 22 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 23 V-4. Diagnostic Services, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 23 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Ground Feeding Birds 25 V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 26 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries V-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicus Biological Consultants
    Indicus Biological Consultants Darwin City Waterfront (Darwin Wharf) Redevelopment Terrestrial fauna assessment December 2003 James Smith Ronald Firth This document is and shall remain the property of Indicus Biological Consultants. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. 29 Aralia Street, Nightcliff phone: (08) 8411 0350 email: [email protected] Contents www.indicusbc.netfirms.com Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Darwin City Waterfront Redevelopment December 2003 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS ................................................................................................................................................................3 Bird counts ........................................................................................................................................................................3 Active Searches .................................................................................................................................................................3 Incidental records ..............................................................................................................................................................4 Bat
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching & Researching Big History: Exploring a New Scholarly Field
    Teaching & Researching Big History: Exploring a New Scholarly Field Leonid Grinin, David Baker, Esther Quaedackers, Andrey Korotayev To cite this version: Leonid Grinin, David Baker, Esther Quaedackers, Andrey Korotayev. Teaching & Researching Big History: Exploring a New Scholarly Field. France. Uchitel, pp.368, 2014, 978-5-7057-4027-7. hprints- 01861224 HAL Id: hprints-01861224 https://hal-hprints.archives-ouvertes.fr/hprints-01861224 Submitted on 24 Aug 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Public Domain INTERNATIONAL BIG HISTORY ASSOCIATION RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ORIENTAL STUDIES The Eurasian Center for Big History and System Forecasting TEACHING & RESEARCHING BIG HISTORY: EXPLORING A NEW SCHOLARLY FIELD Edited by Leonid Grinin, David Baker, Esther Quaedackers, and Andrey Korotayev ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House Volgograd ББК 28.02 87.21 Editorial Council: Cynthia Stokes Brown Ji-Hyung Cho David Christian Barry Rodrigue Teaching & Researching Big History: Exploring a New Scholarly Field / Edited by Leonid E. Grinin, David Baker, Esther Quaedackers, and Andrey V. Korotayev. – Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2014. – 368 pp. According to the working definition of the International Big History Association, ‘Big History seeks to understand the integrated history of the Cosmos, Earth, Life and Humanity, using the best available empirical evidence and scholarly methods’.
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Bird Damage
    Managing Bird Damage Managing Bird Managing Bird Damage Bird damage is a significant problem in Australia with total to Fruit and Other Horticultural Crops damage to horticultural production estimated at nearly $300 million annually. Over 60 bird species are known to damage horticultural crops. These species possess marked differences in feeding strategies and movement patterns which influence the nature, timing and severity of the damage they cause. Reducing bird damage is difficult because of the to Fruit and Other Horticultural Crops Fruit and Other Horticultural to unpredictability of damage from year to year and a lack of information about the cost-effectiveness of commonly used management practices. Growers therefore need information on how to better predict patterns of bird movement and abundance, and simple techniques to estimate the extent of damage to guide future management investment. This book promotes the adoption of a more strategic approach to bird management including use of better techniques to reduce damage and increased cooperation between neighbours. Improved collaboration and commit- John Tracey ment from industry and government is also essential along with reconciliation of legislation and responsibilities. Mary Bomford Whilst the focus of this review is pest bird impacts on Quentin Hart horticulture, most of the issues are of relevance to pest bird Glen Saunders management in general. Ron Sinclair DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY Managing Bird Damage Managing Bird Managing Bird Damage Bird damage is a significant problem in Australia with total to Fruit and Other Horticultural Crops damage to horticultural production estimated at nearly $300 million annually. Over 60 bird species are known to damage horticultural crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of New Guinea Field Guide (Beehler Et Al
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction The New Guinea Region Our region of coverage follows Mayr (1941: vi), who defined the natural region that encompasses the avifauna of New Guinea, naming it the “New Guinea Region.” It comprises the great tropical island of New Guinea as well as an array of islands lying on its continental shelf or immediately offshore. This region extends from the equator to latitude 12o south and from longitude 129o east to 155o east; it is 2,800 km long by 750 km wide and supports the largest remaining contiguous tract of old-growth humid tropical forest in the Asia-Pacific (Beehler 1993a). The Region includes the Northwestern Islands (Raja Ampat group) of the far west—Waigeo, Batanta, Salawati, Misool, Kofiau, Gam, Gebe, and Gag; the Aru Islands of the southwest—Wokam, Kobroor, Trangan, and others; the Bay Islands of Geelvink/Cenderawasih Bay—Biak-Supiori, Numfor, Mios Num, and Yapen; Dolak Island of south-central New Guinea (also known as Dolok, Kimaam, Kolepom, Yos Sudarso, or Frederik Hendrik); Daru and Kiwai Islands of eastern south-central New Guinea; islands of the north coast of Papua New Guinea (PNG)—Kairiru, Muschu, Manam, Bagabag, and Karkar; and the Southeastern (Milne Bay) Islands of the far southeast—Goodenough, Fergusson, Normanby, Kiriwina, Kaileuna, Wood- lark, Misima, Tagula/Sudest, and Rossel, plus many groups of smaller islands (see the endpapers for a graphic delimitation of the Region).
    [Show full text]