DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning of Nuclear Power Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning of Nuclear Power Systems ASKO VUORINEN Planning of Nuclear Power Systems To Save the Planet Ekoenergo Oy August, 2011 The nuclear power could generate 27 % of electricity by 2050 and 34 % by 2075. Nuclear electricity generation can make the biggest change in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and it would be possible to limit the global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100. 1 Copyright © 2011 Ekoenergo Oy Lokirinne 8 A 25, 02320 Espoo, Finland Telephone (+358) 440451022 The book is available for internet orders www.optimalpowersystems.com Email (for orders and customer service enquires): [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, scanning or otherwise, except under terms of copyright, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the publisher should be addressed to Ekoenergo Oy, Lokirinne 8 A 25, 02320 Espoo, Finland or emailed to [email protected]. Comments to the author can be sent directly to [email protected]. Cover page: the Planet and Atoms. Created by my son Architect Teo-Tuomas Vuorinen 2 Table of Contents PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 .ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 15 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................... 17 1.1 The smallest particles ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1.2 Theories of nuclear energy ................................................................................................................................ 20 1.3 Development during the Second World War .................................................................................................... 23 1.4 The Manhattan project ...................................................................................................................................... 26 1.5 Other nuclear programs .................................................................................................................................... 33 1.6 Energy of the sun ............................................................................................................................................... 35 1.6.1 The American hydrogen bomb ................................................................................................................... 35 1.6.2 The Soviet hydrogen bomb ......................................................................................................................... 36 1.7 Opposition voices .............................................................................................................................................. 36 2. NUCLEAR REACTORS ................................................................................................................................................ 38 2.1 The first power reactors .................................................................................................................................... 38 2.2 Fast breeder reactors......................................................................................................................................... 38 2.2.1 USA ............................................................................................................................................................. 38 2.2.2 The United Kingdom ................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.3 France ......................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.4 The Soviet Union ......................................................................................................................................... 40 2.3 Graphite reactors ............................................................................................................................................... 42 2.3.1 The Soviet Union ......................................................................................................................................... 42 2.3.2 Magnox in the UK ....................................................................................................................................... 42 2.3.3 The AGR in the UK....................................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.4 UNGG in France .......................................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.5 The HTGR in the US ..................................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.6 The Pebble Bed Reactor in Germany .......................................................................................................... 44 2.4 Pressurized water reactors ................................................................................................................................ 44 2.4.1 Westinghouse ............................................................................................................................................. 45 2.4.2 Combustion Engineering ............................................................................................................................. 46 2.4.3 Babcock Wilcox ........................................................................................................................................... 46 3 2.4.4 VVER (Rosatom, Atomstroiexport) ............................................................................................................. 47 2.4.5 European PWR reactors .............................................................................................................................. 48 2.4.6 The Korean PWR reactors ........................................................................................................................... 49 2.4.7 The Chinese PWR ........................................................................................................................................ 49 2.5 Boiling water reactors ........................................................................................................................................ 50 2.5.1 General Electric BWR .................................................................................................................................. 50 2.5.2 ABWR (GE Toshiba) ..................................................................................................................................... 50 2.5.3 ESBWR (GE Hitachi)..................................................................................................................................... 51 2.5.4 BWR (Asea Atom) ....................................................................................................................................... 51 2.5.5 BWR (Areva) ................................................................................................................................................ 52 2.6 Heavy water reactor .......................................................................................................................................... 52 2.6.1 Candu .......................................................................................................................................................... 52 2.6.2 ACR-1000 .................................................................................................................................................... 53 2.7 Thorium breeder reactors ................................................................................................................................. 53 2.7.1 Molten salt reactor ..................................................................................................................................... 53 2.7.2 VHTR ........................................................................................................................................................... 53 2.7.3 Candu .......................................................................................................................................................... 54 2.7.4 AHWR-300 .................................................................................................................................................. 54 2.7.5 Thorium fired light water reactors ............................................................................................................. 54 3. NUCLEAR PROGRAMS .............................................................................................................................................. 55 3.1 Big plans in the United States ............................................................................................................................ 55 3.2 Finnish nuclear program ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay: the Crew
    AFA’s Enola Gay Controversy Archive Collection www.airforcemag.com The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay From the Air Force Association’s Enola Gay Controversy archive collection Online at www.airforcemag.com The Crew The Commander Paul Warfield Tibbets was born in Quincy, Ill., Feb. 23, 1915. He joined the Army in 1937, became an aviation cadet, and earned his wings and commission in 1938. In the early years of World War II, Tibbets was an outstanding B-17 pilot and squadron commander in Europe. He was chosen to be a test pilot for the B-29, then in development. In September 1944, Lt. Col. Tibbets was picked to organize and train a unit to deliver the atomic bomb. He was promoted to colonel in January 1945. In May 1945, Tibbets took his unit, the 509th Composite Group, to Tinian, from where it flew the atomic bomb missions against Japan in August. After the war, Tibbets stayed in the Air Force. One of his assignments was heading the bomber requirements branch at the Pentagon during the development of the B-47 jet bomber. He retired as a brigadier general in 1966. In civilian life, he rose to chairman of the board of Executive Jet Aviation in Columbus, Ohio, retiring from that post in 1986. At the dedication of the National Air and Space Museum’s Udvar- Hazy Center in December 2003, the 88-year-old Tibbets stood in front of the restored Enola Gay, shaking hands and receiving the high regard of visitors. (Col. Paul Tibbets in front of the Enola Gay—US Air Force photo) The Enola Gay Crew Airplane Crew Col.
    [Show full text]
  • ARE DRONES a FORCE for GOOD? How Drones Are Being Used to Benefit Society
    BRIEF FOOD AND DRINK CULTURE GEAR SPORTS STYLE WOMEN HOME > BANNER- HOME > MAGAZINE ARE DRONES A FORCE FOR GOOD? How drones are being used to benefit society By Matthew Priest Words: Max Mueller NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION Get the lowdown on the week ahead to your inbox, together with reviews, exclusive competitions and the occasional funny list. Enter Your Email SUBSCRIBE MOST POPULAR THIS WEEK Read Shared Galleries HOW TO BULK UP LIKE A RUGBY PLAYER Drones usually feature in the news due to their controversial use as weapons of war or, more prosaically, for their use as fun but largely impractical toys. But what if the technology could be used to help the environment or save lives? This month, the UAE is again promoting the humanitarian use of drones with a $1 million competition that features the best designs from around the world. Here is a bird’s eye view of the technology and its pitfalls, in the Middle East and beyond. *** WHAT I’VE LEARNT: FLAVIO BRIATORE Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, April 10, 2015. Four years after the March 2011 meltdown, a stream of images is being recorded inside reactor No 1, one of three that was badly damaged after the plant was hit by a devastating tsunami. As the remote-controlled robot crawls through debris, the on-board searchlight struggles to penetrate a thick dust cloud. It also has to navigate charred concrete girders coated in solidified molten metal that now resemble warped stalactites. CESARO: 8 THINGS WE’VE At the bottom of the video screen is a digital display of the radiation exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wright Stuff
    1203cent.qxd 11/13/03 2:19 PM Page 1 n a chilly North Carolina edge. It is likely that this informa- Omorning 100 years ago, two tion became the basis for the design brothers from Dayton, Ohio, at- of their early gliders. It also led them tempted a feat others considered im- to contact Octave Chanute, an possible, and their success changed American engineer who was the world. leading the way for experiments in Today we take air travel for aeronautics. granted, and rarely give a second thought to our capability to fly liter- Three problems ally anywhere in the world. But one The Wrights realized from the be- hundred years ago, the endeavors ginning that they had to solve three of the Wrights and other aeronau- problems: tical pioneers were widely viewed • Balance and control. as foolhardy. Although some of the THE WRIGHT • Wing shape and resulting lift. world’s most creative minds were • Application of power to the converging on a solution to the flight structure. problem, well-respected scientists STUFF: Of the three, they correctly recog- such as Lord Kelvin thought flight Materials in the Wright Flyer nized that balance and control were impossible. the least understood and probably In fact, Simon Newcomb, pro- The flight of the Wright Flyer was the most critical. To solve that fessor of mathematics and as- the “first in the history of the world problem, they turned to gliding ex- tronomy at Johns Hopkins Univer- periments. sity and vice-president of the in which a machine carrying a man National Academy of Sciences, had had raised itself by its own power The 1900 glider declared only 18 months before the into the air in full flight, had sailed After a few preliminary experi- successful flight at Kitty Hawk, forward without reduction of speed, ments with small kites, they built “Flight by machines heavier than air and had finally landed at a point as their first glider in 1900.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRCRAFT Into Flames and Plummeted out of Control Toward the Ground
    activation, training, and deployment to the Pacific Theater of Operation (PTO). Chapter Three emphasizes the combat operations of the 315th during the months it was based in the PTO. Finally, Chapter Four summarizes the significance of the strategic air campaign against Japan and the 315th's contribution to that effort. The history of the 315th BombWing is closely linked to the story of the B-29 aircraft Make them the biggest, gun them the flown by the unit and to the mission of the Twentieth Air heaviest, and fly them the farthest! Force, the parent unit of the 315th in the PTO. A brief General H. H. Arnold discussion follows to highlight these relationships. The B-29, struck by the intense flak, suddenly burst THE AIRCRAFT into flames and plummeted out of control toward the ground. The Japanese searchlights had found the B-29 hidden in the night sky, and the antiaircraft batteries quickly inflicted their General Henry H. Arnold spearheaded the develop­ mortal wound on the American heavy bomber. Captain ment of the B-29 aircraft. As early as 1939, Gen Arnold Kenneth Dougherty, an aircraft commander in another B-29 pursued the development of a very long-range, very heavy that night, gave his account of the incident. bomber in anticipation of future air power requirements. At landfall there were four or five planes together. One Our B-29 idea come to birth in those days when it appeared stayed right with us all the way in. He was slightly ahead atthat England would go down to defeat, and there'd be no 1 o'clock.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Envelope Applications Utilizing Drone Technologies
    Raymond Engineering – Georgia, Inc. 401104237 DRONING ON ABOUT DRONES Ray Ramos, PE July 12, 2017 Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request. This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. __________________________________________ Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation. Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of the speaker is prohibited. Course This course gives the audience an understanding of the history of drones and associated technology; and how the development and use of drones have evolved over time. Additionally, the course includes performing an actual drone demonstration showing how a drone currently works and how they can be used by building/property owners, architects, engineers, consultants, and/or contractors. Learning At the end of the this course, participants will be able to: • Learning Objective 1: Understanding how drones got their start and have evolved over time. • Learning Objective 2: Overview of the types of drones and uses. • Learning Objective 3: Use and operations issues and how to resolve them • Learning Objective 4: To perform a drone demonstration in order to showcase it’s capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the History of Engineering at the Linda Hall Library
    Exploring the History of Engineering at the Linda Hall Library Benjamin Gross, Ph.D. VP for Research & Scholarship Linda Hall Library September 18, 2018 City of Fountains,Engineers, HeartHeart ofof thethe NationNation https://www.kauffman.org/ https://http://commons.wikimedia.orgeclubofkc.org/ / City of Engineers, Heart of the Nation https://www.kctechcouncil.com/ Engineering Triumphs Kansas City Bridge (1869) Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts (2011) LHL https://www.azahner.com/ …and Tragedies Kemper Arena (1979) Hyatt Regency Hotel (1981) http://www.kcur.org/ https://www.kansascity.com/ Recent Achievements Google Fiber (2012) KC Streetcar (2016) https://www.nytimes.com/ https://www.nytimes.com/ Linda Hall Library A Plenary in Three Parts 1) The Roots of American Engineering 2) A Remarkable Gift 3) New Frontiers in the History of Engineering LHL I. The Roots of American Engineering Images from The Panorama of Professions and Trades (Edward Hazen, 1836) The Middlesex Canal • 1793: Formation of Middlesex Canal Company • Goal: Linking Charles and Merrimack Rivers (27 miles) • Loammi Baldwin (1744-1807) • Cabinetmaker and Revolutionary War veteran • No experience building canals • Reliance on foreign expertise (William Weston) ”The greatest work of the kind which has been completed in the United States.” –Albert Gallatin http://www.middlesexcanal.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/ European Engineering Traditions British civil engineers French military engineers LHL LHL British Civil Engineers • Characteristics • Open to all social classes
    [Show full text]
  • John Joseph Montgomery 1883 Glider
    John Joseph Montgomery 1883 Glider An International Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark Designated by ASME International The American Society of Mechanical Engineers May 11, 1996 at Hiller Aircraft Museum and Santa Clara University INTERNATIONAL HISTORIC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LANDMARK JOHN J. MONTGOMERY HUMAN PILOTED GLIDER 1883 THIS REPLICA THE FIRST HEAVIER - THAN - AIR CRAFT TO ACHIEVE CONTROLLED. PILOTED FLIGHT. THE GLIDER'S DESIGN BASED ON THE PIONEERING AERODYNAMIC THEORIES AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES OF JOHN JOSEPH MONTGOMERY (1858-1911). WHO DESIGNED, BUILT, AND FLEW IT. THIS GLIDER WAS WAY AHEAD OF ITS. TIME . INCORPORATING A SINGLE PARABOLIC. CAMBERED WING. WITH STABILIZING AND CONTROL SURFACES AT THE REAR OF THE FUSELAGE. WITH HIS GLIDER'S SUCCESS, MONTGOMERY DEMONSTRATED AERODYNAMIC PRINCIPLES AND DESIGNES FUNDAMENTAL TO MODERN AIRCRAFT. THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGS 1996 2 Historical Background Montgomery was the first to incorporate On Aug. 28, 1883, at Otay Mesa near San Diego, a manned successfully the wing glider left the surface of the earth and soared in a stable, con- airfoil parabolic shape trolled flight. At the controls was John Joseph Montgomery, in a heavier-than-air aged 25, who had designed and built the fragile craft. After the man-carrying aircraft. launching, John and his brother James, who had helped launch His glider also had its the glider, paced off the distance of the flight as 600 feet. In ad- stabilizing and con- dition to James, several local ranchers and others in John’s fam- trol surfaces at the ily witnessed the construction and flight of the 1883 glider. rear of the aircraft, This 1883 flight of Montgomery’s glider was the first manned, the placement of controlled flight of a heavier-than-air machine in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of War Culture in Silverplate B-29 Nose Art from the 509Th Composite Group by Terri D. Wesemann, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2019
    METAL STORYTELLERS: REFLECTIONS OF WAR CULTURE IN SILVERPLATE B-29 NOSE ART FROM THE 509TH COMPOSITE GROUP by Terri D. Wesemann A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in American Studies Specialization Folklore Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Randy Williams, MS Jeannie Thomas, Ph.D. Committee Chair Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Susan Grayzel, Ph.D. Richard S. Inouye, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice Provost for Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2019 Copyright © Terri Wesemann 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Metal Storytellers: Reflections of War Culture in Silverplate B-29 Nose Art From the 509th Composite Group by Terri D. Wesemann, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2019 Committee Chair: Randy Williams, MS Department: English Most people are familiar with the Enola Gay—the B-29 that dropped Little Boy, the first atomic bomb, over the city of Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945. Less known are the fifteen Silverplate B-29 airplanes that trained for the mission, that were named and later adorned with nose art. However, in recorded history, the atomic mission overshadowed the occupational folklore of this group. Because the abundance of planes were scrapped in the decade after World War II and most WWII veterans have passed on, all that remains of their occupational folklore are photographs, oral and written histories, some books, and two iconic airplanes in museum exhibits. Yet, the public’s infatuation and curiosity with nose art keeps the tradition alive. The purpose of my graduate project and internship with the Hill Aerospace Museum was to collaborate on a 60-foot exhibit that analyzes the humanizing aspects of the Silverplate B-29 nose art from the 509th Composite Group and show how nose art functioned in three ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 509Th Composite Group Photography
    509th Composite Group Photography 2001 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 General............................................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 509th Composite Group Photography NASM.2000.0026 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: 509th Composite Group Photography Identifier: NASM.2000.0026 Date: [ca. 1945] Extent: 0.05 Cubic feet ((1 folder)) Creator: Downey, John L. Language: English . Administrative Information Acquisition Information John L. Downey, gift, 2000-0026, NASM Restrictions No restrictions on access Conditions Governing Use Material is subject to Smithsonian Terms of Use. Should you wish to use NASM material in any medium, please submit an Application for Permission to Reproduce
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Atomic Bomb Commander: Colonel Cliff Heflin and His “Special” 216Th AAF Base Unit
    The Other Atomic Bomb Commander: Colonel Cliff Heflin and his “Special” 216th AAF Base Unit 14 AIR POWER History / WINTER 2012 Darrell F. Dvorak AIR POWER History / WINTER 2012 15 (Overleaf) B–17s at he Distinguished Service Medal is earned for Wendover AAFB. “exceptionally meritorious service to the gov- T ernment in a duty of great responsibility, in combat or otherwise.” The U.S. Air Force’s third- most prestigious award, it is rarely given to airmen lower than major general, but it was awarded to Col. Clifford J. Heflin upon his retirement in 1968 after thirty-one years of service. Heflin was recom- mended for the DSM primarily because he had com- manded two vital, top secret and highly successful projects in World War II. Few people—military or civilian—knew about those commands at the time, and even fewer knew about them when Heflin died in 1980. The story of his first command began to emerge in 1985 but remains little known, and the story of his second command is remembered only by his immediate family. Both deserve to be univer- sally known because together they change the pre- vailing narrative of the Army Air Forces (AAF) role in the atomic bombing of Japan. This paper is based on Heflin’s private records, overlooked primary sources, and prior scholarship. It addresses three key questions: Why was Heflin chosen for a top com- mand in the atomic bomb project; what were his specific contributions to that project; and why has his story been overlooked? After almost seventy years, “The Manhattan Further sessions between Groves and Arnold in July Project” is widely recognized as the codename for the and August conceptually defined two key organiza- massive, top secret U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic “Aerodrome A”
    Politically Incorrect The Flights and Fights Involving the Langley Aerodrome By Nick Engler As morning dawned on 28 May 1914, the “Aerodrome A” perched like a giant dragonfly on the edge of Lake Keuka, surrounded by journalists, photographers, even a videographer. Members of the scientific elite and Washington DC power structure were also there, among them Charles Doolittle Walcott, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and Albert Zahm, the director of the recently reopened Langley Aerodynamical Laboratory. They carefully spun the event for the media, explaining why they were attempting to fly the infamous Langley Aerodrome eleven years after two highly-publicized, unsuccessful, and nearly- catastrophic launch attempts. A cool breeze blew down the lake, gently rocking the four tandem wings that sprouted from the Aerodrome’s central framework. It was time to go. As the sun crept higher in the sky the winds would kick up. With a pronounced 12-degree dihedral between the pairs of 22-foot wings, even a modest crosswind could flip the old aircraft if it got under a wing. Workmen from the Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company of Hammondsport, New York lined up along the pontoons and outriggers recently added to the airframe. They lifted the half-ton aircraft a foot or so above the ramp, duck-walked it into the water and turned it into the wind. 1 Glenn Curtiss waded out, stepped onto the braces between the forward pontoons and climbed into the nacelle that hung beneath the framework. He settled into the cockpit and tested the familiar Curtiss controls – wheel, post and shoulder yoke borrowed from one of his early pushers.1 This system had replaced the dual trim wheels that had steered the original Aerodrome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Tinian Island During World War II OUTLINE
    The Use of Tinian Island During World War II OUTLINE • Background • Assault on Tinian Island • Seabee Construction and North Field • Tinian and the Atomic Bombs • Tinian Today Background • Tinian and Saipan Islands had been Japanese stronghold since the end of WW I • Ability to reach Japan with long-range B-29 bombers • Saipan was attacked on 15 June 1944 and captured by mid-August 1944 Background Assault on Tinian "An Amtrac loaded with Marines, churns through the sea bound for beaches of Tinian Island" July 1944. Two tiny landing beaches, White 1 and White 2, were used at Tinian to land two entire divisions. Each beach was slightly less than 200 feet wide! One of 10 “doodlebug” landing ramps built by the Seabees mounted on an Amtrac The SeaBees fashioned these ramps from scrap steel taken out of a Japanese Sugar Mill on Saipan. They allowed Marine Amtracs to scale the 8-foot high cliffs along the White Beach landing zone The Americans employed a deception landing off the coast of Tinian Town, holding Japanese forces there while the main landings occurred at White Beaches on the northwest side of Tinian. The deception force then proceeded north and landed at White Beach. Construction of the World’s Largest Air Bases on Tinian Four 8,500 foot runways were eventually constructed by the SeaBees at North Field on Tinian, in addition to two similar runways constructed at West Feld, a few miles southwest. The four runways at North Field on Tinian comprised the largest single airport in world in mid-summer 1945.
    [Show full text]