Organic Chemistry from the Eastern Bloc Florina Voica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organic Chemistry from the Eastern Bloc Florina Voica Baran Lab GM 08/13/2011 Organic Chemistry from the Eastern Bloc Florina Voica The goal of this presentation is to offer a detailed perspective on the state of art in organic chemistry research in the major academic centers in former Eastern Bloc countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia). The analysis for each individual country consists in identifying the researchers who have made significant contributions to the field. Historic context: - The Eastern Bloc refers to the region in Europe which entered under Soviet influence after WWII (Yalta conferene, 1945); - These were communist countries, either directly reporting to Moscow, or having more "independent" communist regimes; - Under the strict, totalitarian policies, the economic development was "extensive rather than intensive", with chracteristic shortages of goods and minimal innovation; - After the fall of USSR (1989-1991), these countries adopted the free market economic model (and democratic governments), but in most cases the '90s remain a period of slow development (transition period/lost generation); - Nov 1993, The Maastricht Treaty established The European Union; - WIth the exception of Albania, Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia and Russia, all former communist countries are now part of the EU; General aspects: The scientist in society: During the almost half a century of soviet cultural influence, science and technology served an important part of national politics and identity. However, significant efforts were focused on pure science and theoretical research, with little practical applications or economic impact. The educational system "In spite of all the apparent shortcomings and faults, the Russian secondary schools seem to prepare the students relatively well for life and for higher education, especially in the sciences and mathematics. The intensity of the work and the student's motivation to succeed is a big factor. Admission to higher education is a crucial, life-long decision and it is made while the student in still in the secondary school." "In general, the Soviet Educators in higher educational institutions receive and work with a better motivated and selected student than their American counterparts. However, the rigid requirements and screenings have an already built-in weakness due to over-specialization." "The earned Doctor degree is supposed to be based on research work containing a theoretical utilization and the solution of a major scientific problem representing a considerable contribution to science and to practical work. It should have a serious impact". "The earned Doctor degree is not a degree in the American sense, but a sign of recongition which could be compared to our post-doctoral experience. Too many Russians remain in one place to work and study under the same man in one field. This creates inbreeding and an educational system that lacks imagination and produces research contributions not up to the level of effort exerted and manpower used" Chemistry Nobel Prize winners J. Chem. Educ. 1971, 48, 60; 1973, 50, 520. - awarded from 1945-2011; chemists who were residents in their countries of birth when they received the award: Nikolay Semyonov (Russia), 1956 - for work on the mechanism of chain reactions; Jaroslav Heyrousky (Czech Republic), 1959 - for developing the polarographic method of analysis; Vladimir Prelog (Croatia), 1975 - for research into the stereochemistry of molecules and reactions; - awarded from 1945-2011; eastern european born chemists who led their research in other countries: Ilya Prigogine (born Russia), 1977 - for his work on dissipative structures, complex systems, and irreversibility; Roald Hoffmann (born Ukraine), 1981 - for the Woodward-Hoffman rule; Aaron Klug (born Lithuania), 1982 - for his development of crystallographic electron microscopy and his structural elucidation of biologically important nucleic acid-protein complexes George Olah (born Hungary), 1994 - for work on carbocations generated with superacids; Avram Hershko (born Hungary), 2004 - for the discovery of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. The pharmaceutical industry: - generic drugs account for more than half of the total market (in value) and almost 3/4 in volume (july 2011); - major generic companies: KrKa (Slovenia), Gedeon Richter (Hungary), PolPharma (Poland), Zentiva (Romania), Pharmstandard (Russia). - highest sales in cardiovascular market, followed by alimentary canal and metabolic disorders; http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/09/02/pharma-industry-booming-in-eastern-europe/ - importantly, the health care system is run by the government, so obviously there is little impetus for significant R&D programs. http://www.espicom.com/prodcat2.nsf/Product_ID_Lookup/00000396?OpenDocument https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Pharmas_generics_opportunity_in_Central_and_Eastern_Europe_2186# Baran Lab GM 08/13/2011 Organic Chemistry from the Eastern Bloc Florina Voica Major Research Centers: O Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences nBuLi, TMS Univ of Warsaw SO2Ph OH Adam Mickiewiecz Univ, Poznan then HClO4, MeOH Warsaw Univ of Technology Gdansk Technical Univ (+)DET, Ti(OiPr)4, TBHP Founding fathers: 1. TsCl, pyr Osman Achmatowicz (1899-1988) - alkaloids isolation 2. (nC9H19)2CuLi (O. Achmatowicz Jr - sugar chemistry, name rxn) Jerzy Suszko (1889-1972) - polycyclic aromatics C9H19 OH Edwin Plazek - heterocyclic chemistry O O Henryk Kuczynski (1909-1991) - terpene chemistry (+)-disparlure Tet. Lett. 1989, 30, 2845 Prof. Jerzy Wicha O O Me Me - born on February 14, 1936, Warsaw, Poland; O - education: Me Me 1. NaOMe, 40% Me H M. Sc.: Moscow State University, 1958 2. H2, Pd/SrSO3 Ph. D.: The University of Warsaw, 1964 OH D. Sc.: The University of Warsaw, 1970 O - positions: O O O 1958-1960 Research Associate, Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry, Warsaw 1960 -1970 Instructor - reader, the University of Warsaw H2, Pd/C 1970 - 1978 Docent, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences I I Me O 1978 - Professor, the same Institute Me Me - 184 publications (Scifinder) 1. L-selectride Me H - major research topics: steroid synthesis, some guanacastepene, Me H Me H 2. N2H4 prostaglandins research, some methods based on the Julia olefination N2H2 3. I2 reaction. OH OH OH HO HO O H H H SO2Ph TMS OSitBuPh TMS 2 1. tBuNC, NaCNBH nBuLi OSitBuPh2 3 Bu SnCl, AIBN O then MsCl dr 3:1 3 H 2. DHP PhO2S OMs O 86% (over 2 steps) 3. MeLi, PhH O LDA, THF Me 89% O Me Me 1. LDA, MoOHPy Me H 2. Ph3P • • O Me H TBAF TMS 41% PhO S OH OH 2 OSitBuPh2 OH THPO THPO Tet. Lett. 1991, 32, 531 H J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4855 H Baran Lab GM 08/13/2011 Organic Chemistry from the Eastern Bloc Florina Voica EtO2C Br O CO2Et Me Me HO Me LDA/THF, -78 °C then Me Br Br TMS TMS Me nBuLi, BF •Et O Me Me Me 3 2 Br iPr H 93% H 80% THPO THPO H H OMe OMe 1.VO(acac)2, TBHP, 86% 1. DIBAL 2. mCPBA, 87% 2. TsCl, pyr 3. TFAA, pyr, 87% 3. Superhydride 80% F3C O O O Br Br O Me Me Me Br Me Br TMS Me Me TBAF, H O, CHBr -50%NaOH 2 Me 3 Me THF, rt CETRIMID O O Me 50%, dr 1:1 Me H H (separable) THPO THPO H H OMe OMe MeLi/Et2O -78 °C to rt then MeI, -78 °C to rt 60% O O O Me Me Me OH Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me TsOH/aq dioxane Me H OH OH THPO HO H H HO Digitoxigenin OMe 23-H-isocalysterol J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1823 (both diastereoisomers are NPs) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1849 Baran Lab GM 08/13/2011 Organic Chemistry from the Eastern Bloc Florina Voica For more on steroid functionalization: J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5388, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3484, NO2 tBuOK DMF/THF DMDO, Ph Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 2223, Tet. Lett. 1988, 29, 4001, J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1280. Ph aq. NH4Cl -70 °C H2O For some representative refs on formal syntheses of different vitamin Ds (20 papers published)- + NC OH Tet. Lett. 1998, 29, 885, Synthesis 1999, 1209; J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5276. NC Me Me For work on terpene synthesis: Tet. Lett. 2005, 46, 1149, J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 8337. 83% SO2Ph SO2Ph Prof. Mieczyslaw Makosza J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4390 - born in 1934 N N N - education: Cl SO2Ph M. Sc : Univ.of Leningrad, 1958 66% Ph.D : Technical Univ. Warsaw, 1956 KOH, DMSO N D.Sc : Technical Univ. Warsaw, 1971 N N - positions: Chem. Lett. 1987, 61 1975-1977, Director, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, SO2Ph Univ. of Warsaw TBSO O- NO + 1979-present, Director, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of 2 N Ph NO Ph Sciences. Ph DBU DBU - 420 publications (Scifinder) TBSCl -TBSOH - major research areas: phase transfer catalysis (chemistry of carbanions SO2 SO2 and carbenes), vicarious nucleophilic substitution. SO2 N N N Me Me Me Vicarious Nucleophilic Substitution of Hydrogen (VNS) - describes the reaction of a nucleophile with a electrophilic arene (nitroarenes, heteroarenes) or DBU alkene; TBSCl - the attack can occur ortho or para to the NO2 group but there are ways to achieve selectivity; DBU TBSO TBSO disubstituted prods are usually not observed; N N N - VNS is an "umpolung Friedel-Crafts" reaction and it complements the scope of the FC rxn since -TBSOH hν Ph it allows functionalization of arenes which are very poor nucleophiles in SEAr. General reaction scheme: SO2 SO2 SO2 N N N base Me Me Me base + R X solvent -HX H Acta Chem. Scand. 1992, 46, 689 + X OMe Y Y Y OH OH Y Me2SO4, MeO NO MeO NO MeO NO2 2 PhO CN 2 NaHCO3 NO NO - R NO - R NO R 2 2 2 2 83% tBuOK, DMF CN CN σH complex 80% Z = F, Cl, Br, I, OMe, OPh, SMe, Et, tBu, Ph, NMe2, CF3, CN, SO2Me, CO2H.
Recommended publications
  • Proteins: a Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics
    PROTEINS: A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF DYNAMICS, STRUCTURE, AND THERMODYNAMICS CHARLES L. BROOKS I11 Department of Chemistry. Carnegie-Mellon IJniversity, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania MARTIN KARPLUS Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts B. MONTGOMERY PETTITT Department of Chemistry University of Houston Houston, Texas ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME L.XXI Series editors Ilya Prigogine Stuart A. Rice University of Brussels Department of Chemistry Brussels. BelRium and and The James Franck Institute University of Texas University of Chicugo Austin. Texas Chicago. Illinois AN INTERSCIENCE” PUBLICATION JOHN WILEY & SONS NEW YORK CHICHESTER BRISBANE TORONTO SINGAPORE PROTEINS: A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF DYNAMICS, STRUCTURE, AND THERMODYNAMICS ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME LXXI EDITORIAL BOARD C. J. BALLHAUSEN,Kobenhaven Universitets Fysisk-Kemiske Institut, Kemisk La- boratorium IV, Kobenhaven, Denmark BRUCE BERNE, Columbia University, Department of Chemistry, New York, New York, U.S.A. RICHARDB. BERNSTEIN,University of California, Department of Chemistry, LOS Angeles, California, U.S.A. G. CARERI,Instituto di Fisica “Guglielmo Marconi,” Universita delli Studi, Piazzle delle Scienze, Rome, Italy MORRELCOHEN, Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Clinton Township, An- nandale, New Jersey, U.S.A. KARLF. FREED,The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. ROBERTGOMER, The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. RAYMONDE. KAPRAL, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada WILLIAMKLEMPERER, Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U .S. A. Yu L. KLIMONTOVITCH,Moscow State University, Moscow, USSR V. KRINSKI,Institute of Biological Physics, USSR Academy of Science, Puschino, Moscow Region, USSR M. MANDEL,Chemie-Complex der Rijks-Universiteit, Wassenaarseweg, Leiden, Netherlands RUDYMARCUS, Department of Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, Pasa- dena, California, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Peptide Chemistry up to Its Present State
    Appendix In this Appendix biographical sketches are compiled of many scientists who have made notable contributions to the development of peptide chemistry up to its present state. We have tried to consider names mainly connected with important events during the earlier periods of peptide history, but could not include all authors mentioned in the text of this book. This is particularly true for the more recent decades when the number of peptide chemists and biologists increased to such an extent that their enumeration would have gone beyond the scope of this Appendix. 250 Appendix Plate 8. Emil Abderhalden (1877-1950), Photo Plate 9. S. Akabori Leopoldina, Halle J Plate 10. Ernst Bayer Plate 11. Karel Blaha (1926-1988) Appendix 251 Plate 12. Max Brenner Plate 13. Hans Brockmann (1903-1988) Plate 14. Victor Bruckner (1900- 1980) Plate 15. Pehr V. Edman (1916- 1977) 252 Appendix Plate 16. Lyman C. Craig (1906-1974) Plate 17. Vittorio Erspamer Plate 18. Joseph S. Fruton, Biochemist and Historian Appendix 253 Plate 19. Rolf Geiger (1923-1988) Plate 20. Wolfgang Konig Plate 21. Dorothy Hodgkins Plate. 22. Franz Hofmeister (1850-1922), (Fischer, biograph. Lexikon) 254 Appendix Plate 23. The picture shows the late Professor 1.E. Jorpes (r.j and Professor V. Mutt during their favorite pastime in the archipelago on the Baltic near Stockholm Plate 24. Ephraim Katchalski (Katzir) Plate 25. Abraham Patchornik Appendix 255 Plate 26. P.G. Katsoyannis Plate 27. George W. Kenner (1922-1978) Plate 28. Edger Lederer (1908- 1988) Plate 29. Hennann Leuchs (1879-1945) 256 Appendix Plate 30. Choh Hao Li (1913-1987) Plate 31.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • STIX 394372 1 En Bookfront
    Quantum Systems in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics VOLUME 30 Honorary Editors Rudolph A. Marcus (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA) Roy McWeeny (Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy) Editors-in-Chief J. Maruani (formerly Laboratoire de Chimie Physique, Paris, France) S. Wilson (formerly Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, UK) Editorial Board E. Brändas (University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden) L. Cederbaum (Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Heidelberg, Germany) G. Delgado-Barrio (Instituto de Matemáticas y Física Fundamental, Madrid, Spain) E.K.U. Gross (Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany) K. Hirao (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) Chao-Ping Hsu (Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan) R. Lefebvre (Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Paris, France) R. Levine (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel) K. Lindenberg (University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA) A. Lund (University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden) M.A.C. Nascimento (Instituto de Química, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) P. Piecuch (Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA) M. Quack (ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland) S.D. Schwartz (Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA) O. Vasyutinskii (Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia) Y.A. Wang (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) Former Editors and Editorial Board Members I. Prigogine (†) W.F. van Gunsteren (*) J. Rychlewski (†) H. Hubač (*) Y.G. Smeyers (†) E. Kryachko (*) R. Daudel (†) M.P. Levy (*) M. Mateev (†) G.L. Malli (*) W.N. Lipscomb (†) P.G. Mezey (*) Y. Chauvin (†) N. Rahman (*) H.W. Kroto (†) S. Suhai (*) H. Ågren (*) O. Tapia (*) V. Aquilanti (*) P.R. Taylor (*) D. Avnir (*) R.G. Woolley (*) J. Cioslowski (*) †: deceased; *: end of term More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6464 Alia Tadjer ⋅ Rossen Pavlov (†) Jean Maruani ⋅ Erkki J.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Lectures™ 2001-2005
    World Scientific Connecting Great Minds 逾10 0 种 诺贝尔奖得主著作 及 诺贝尔奖相关图书 我们非常荣幸得以出版超过100种诺贝尔奖得主著作 以及诺贝尔奖相关图书。 我们自1980年代开始与诺贝尔奖得主合作出版高品质 畅销书。一些得主担任我们的编辑顾问、丛书编辑, 并于我们期刊发表综述文章与学术论文。 世界科技与帝国理工学院出版社还邀得其中多位作了公 开演讲。 Philip W Anderson Sir Derek H R Barton Aage Niels Bohr Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Murray Gell-Mann Georges Charpak Nicolaas Bloembergen Baruch S Blumberg Hans A Bethe Aaron J Ciechanover Claude Steven Chu Cohen-Tannoudji Leon N Cooper Pierre-Gilles de Gennes Niels K Jerne Richard Feynman Kenichi Fukui Lawrence R Klein Herbert Kroemer Vitaly L Ginzburg David Gross H Gobind Khorana Rita Levi-Montalcini Harry M Markowitz Karl Alex Müller Sir Nevill F Mott Ben Roy Mottelson 诺贝尔奖相关图书 THE PERIODIC TABLE AND A MISSED NOBEL PRIZES THAT CHANGED MEDICINE NOBEL PRIZE edited by Gilbert Thompson (Imperial College London) by Ulf Lagerkvist & edited by Erling Norrby (The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) This book brings together in one volume fifteen Nobel Prize- winning discoveries that have had the greatest impact upon medical science and the practice of medicine during the 20th “This is a fascinating account of how century and up to the present time. Its overall aim is to groundbreaking scientists think and enlighten, entertain and stimulate. work. This is the insider’s view of the process and demands made on the Contents: The Discovery of Insulin (Robert Tattersall) • The experts of the Nobel Foundation who Discovery of the Cure for Pernicious Anaemia, Vitamin B12 assess the originality and significance (A Victor Hoffbrand) • The Discovery of
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy 2 Editorial out Ofhealthcare Taking Thepollution Unpopular Sector the Benefitsofan Nuclear Energy Tion Whichhasbeenignoredfortoolong
    954050_RDT40_EN 19-02-2004 07:51 Pagina 1 a ISSN 1024-0802 Nuclear 15 KI-AB-03-040-EN-C Energy Can we do without it? Environment Taking the pollution out of health care p. 15 Science and ethics Protecting the ‘whistle-blowers’ p. 35 954050_RDT40_EN 19-02-2004 07:51 Pagina 2 2 RTD info N° 40 February 2004 Editorial Science under pressure Sacked or suspended… while others are being individuals acting as the ‘conscience’ of sci- one and the same time. This causes confusion, prevented from publishing – it is not unusual for ence do not always have the legal or legislative conflicts and sometimes irregularities. It blurs scientists who publicly express doubts or fears tools to ensure their voices are heard and their their image and that of science along with it. about the consequences of their research to find rights are respected. In this respect, science is Aware of the problem, the publishers of certain their civic conscience causing them profes- a very human and mundane activity, with its fair journals now require their contributors to cite sional problems. At a time when science is per- share of conflicts, slip-ups and moral issues. the source of their funding as proof that an art- haps too often seen as the universal magic icle deemed to be scientifically correct is not, at Researchers must therefore be able to speak out wand, there is the temptation to have scientists the same time, potentially biased. freely on the ethical aspects of their research, say what the politicians or captains of industry subject of course to the exclusion of ‘denounce- Until researchers speak openly and transparently would like to hear.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Foundation for Mechanics, Thermodynamics, and Evolution
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 20 August 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0469.v2 Article A Contextual Foundation for Mechanics, Thermodynamics, and Evolution Harrison Crecraft 1,* 1 GeoEx Analytics: [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The prevailing interpretations of physics are based on deeply entrenched assumptions, rooted in classical mechanics. Logical implications include: the denial of entropy and irreversible change as fundamental properties of state; the inability to explain random quantum measurements and nonlocality without unjustifiable assumptions and untestable metaphysical implications; and the inability to explain or even define the evolution of complexity. The dissipative conceptual model (DCM) is based on empirically justified assumptions. It generalizes mechanics’ definition of state by acknowledging the contextual relationship between a physical system and its positive-temperature ambient background, and it defines the DCM entropy as a fundamental contextual property of physical states. The irreversible production of entropy establishes the thermodynamic arrow of time and a system’s process of dissipation as fundamental. The DCM defines a system’s utilization by the measurable rate of internal work on its components and as an objective measure of stability for a dissipative process. The spontaneous transition of dissipative processes to higher utilization and stability defines two evolutionary paths. The evolution of life proceeded by both competition for resources and cooperation to evolve and sustain higher functional complexity. The DCM accommodates classical and quantum mechanics and thermodynamics as idealized non-contextual special cases. Keywords: Physical Foundations; Quantum mechanics; Nonlocality; Time; Entropy; Thermodynamics; Origin of Life 1. Introduction Physics has had a foundational crisis since the early Twentieth Century, when classical mechanics ceded its supremacy to quantum mechanics and relativity as fundamental descriptions of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Got Moseley's Prize?
    Chapter 4 Who Got Moseley’s Prize? Virginia Trimble1 and Vera V. Mainz*,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, United States 2Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, United States *E-mail: [email protected]. Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley (1887-1915) made prompt and very skilled use of the then new technique of X-ray scattering by crystals (Bragg scattering) to solve several problems about the periodic table and atoms. He was nominated for both the chemistry and physics Nobel Prizes by Svante Arrhenius in 1915, but was dead at Gallipoli before the committees finished their deliberations. Instead, the 1917 physics prize (announced in 1918 and presented on 6 June 1920) went to Charles Glover Barkla (1877-1944) “for discovery of the Röntgen radiation of the elements.” This, and his discovery of X-ray polarization, were done with earlier techniques that he never gave up. Moseley’s contemporaries and later historians of science have written that he would have gone on to other major achievements and a Nobel Prize if he had lived. In contrast, after about 1916, Barkla moved well outside the scientific mainstream, clinging to upgrades of his older methods, denying the significance of the Bohr atom and quantization, and continuing to report evidence for what he called the J phenomenon. This chapter addresses the lives and scientific endeavors of Moseley and Barkla, something about the context in which they worked and their connections with other scientists, contemporary, earlier, and later. © 2017 American Chemical Society Introduction Henry Moseley’s (Figure 1) academic credentials consisted of a 1910 Oxford BA with first-class honors in Mathematical Moderations and a second in Natural Sciences (physics) and the MA that followed more or less automatically a few years later.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Community of Chemists and Physics in the Nineteenth- Century Habsburg Monarchy
    The Scientific Community of Chemists and Physics in the Nineteenth- Century Habsburg Monarchy Alois Kernbauer Professor History of Science and Technology University of Vienna July 1995 Working Paper 95-4 © 1997 by the Center for Austrian Studies. Permission to reproduce must generally be obtained from the Center for Austrian Studies. Copying is permitted in accordance with the fair use guidelines of the US Copyright Act of 1976. The the Center for Austrian Studies permits the following additional educational uses without permission or payment of fees: academic libraries may place copies of the Center's Working Papers on reserve (in multiple photocopied or electronically retrievable form) for students enrolled in specific courses: teachers may reproduce or have reproduced multiple copies (in photocopied or electronic form) for students in their courses. Those wishing to reproduce Center for Austrian Studies Working Papers for any other purpose (general distribution, advertising or promotion, creating new collective works, resale, etc.) must obtain permission from the Center. In 1838 the famous chemist Justus von Liebig published his treatise, "The Condition of Chemistry in Austria"(1) (Der Zustand der Chemie in Österreich) in his renowned journal, The Annals of Chemistry and Pharmacy (Annalen der Chemie und Pharmazie). After analyzing and criticizing contemporary Austrian chemists, he concluded that chemistry as conducted in Austria could not be termed scientific. When, some twenty years later, Ernst Mach began studying physics at the University of Vienna, he told one of his professors that he would like to become a scientist and enter a university career. The professor advised Mach to chose another field because physics as a science was finished.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Aleksander Wies³aw Zamojski 1929–2004 OBITUARY*
    Polish J. Chem., 79, 155–161 (2005) Professor Aleksander Wies³aw Zamojski 1929–2004 OBITUARY* Aleksander Wies³aw Zamojski was born in Poznañ on 1st September 1929. His father Szczepan was a medical doctor. Alex received his early education in elemen- tary school in Smigiel near Poznañ and then in Aleksandrów near £ódŸ. During the Second World War he attended hidden education in £ódŸ. In 1948 Alex graduated from high-school with a special mathematics-physics program and began his chemi- cal education at the Chemistry Department of the Technical University of £ódŸ. In 1952 he obtained the degree of engineer and then in 1954, M.Sc. in chemistry. The same year he moved to Warsaw, where he was appointed as a teaching assistant at the Chemistry Department of Warsaw University and started his Ph.D. program under the supervision of Professor Osman Achmatowicz on reactions of carbonyl cyanide CO(CN)2. This very reactive compound had been synthesized by Professor Roman Ma³achowski before the Second World War. Alex demonstrated the extremely high reactivity of carbonyl cyanide as a heterodienophile in the Diels-Alder reaction lead- ing to dihydropyran derivatives. He also showed that diethyl mesoxalate was an even better dienophile. In 1959 he defended his Ph.D. thesis entitled ‘Diene reactions of carbonyl cyanide and diethyl mesoxalate’. In 1959–61 he received a Rockefeller fel- lowship to work as a post-doctoral at the ETH in Zurich in the laboratory of the future Nobel Prize laureate Professor Vladimir Prelog, where he was engaged in a project directed to the structure determination of two antibiotics – narbomycin and lankacidin.
    [Show full text]
  • RF Annual Report
    The Rockefeller Foundation Annual Report, 1960 FnilWDAT JAN 2 Q 2001 LIBRARY > iii West 5oth Street, New York 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation \%0 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation CONTENTS TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, AND COMMITTEES, 1960-1961 xvi TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, AND COMMITTEES, 1961-1962 xviii OFFICERS AND STAFF MEMBERS, 1960 xx LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL xxvii The President's Review John D. Rockefeller, Jr., 1874-1960 3 Financial Summary for 1960 7 Program Dynamics 8 The Local Relevance of Learning 12 The Agricultural Development of Africa 20 Training in International Affairs 26 Language: Barrier or Bridge? 34 Communication in the Americas 36 An International Study Center for Modern Art 38 The Art of the American Indian 39 A Registry for American Craftsmen 4] The International Rice Research Institute 43 The Foundation's Operating Programs Agriculture 45 Arthropod-Borne Viruses 63 Organizational Information • 74 Summary of Appropriations Account and Principal Fund 81 ILLUSTRATIONS following 82 v 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation Medical and Natural Sciences INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT 87 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION Harvard Medical Center: Central Medical Library 90 All-India Institute of Medical Sciences: Teaching Hospital and Scholarship Program 91 University College of the West Indies: Faculty of Medicine 92 University of Guadalajara: Faculty of Medicine 93 American University of Beirut: Medical School 94 National Institute of Nutrition, Mexico: Hospital for Nutritional Diseases 95 University of Ankara: Research Institute
    [Show full text]
  • ED289758.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 289 758 SO 018 082 AUTHOR Williams, Roger J. TITLE Rethinking Education: The Coming Age of Enlightenment. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8022-2500-4 PUB DATE 86 NOTE 156p. AVAILABLE FROMPhilosophical Library, 200 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019 ($15.00). PUB TYPE Books (010) Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Change; Educational Development; Educational Improvement; Educational Innovation; *Educational Philosophy; Educational Theories; *Fused Curriculum; Higher Education; *Humanistic Education; Humanization; *Integrated Curriculum; *Interdisciplinary Approach; Social Sciences; Unified Studies Curriculum ABSTRACT The world's most serious problems involve people's inability to peacefully coexist with other people.The only antidote to prejudice, injustice, murder, and terrorism is to developan understanding of the many different patterns of human life.However, western civilization and its educational systems have developed into fragmented forms, resulting in numerous unrelated disciplinesthat disregard an overall perspective and do not promote the solutionof multifaceted problems. This book proposes the unificationof all knowledge and offers ideas for educational systems that consider human problems and prepare persons to live ina complex world. The benefits of interdisciplinary education include the fosteringof human understanding, the seeking of mutual efforts toward solutions for human and social, problems, and prevention ofwar. Factors involved in establishing successful interdisciplinaryeducation programs include: (1) positive attitudes; (2) their emphasis anduse by instructors; and (3) growth in the number of interdepartmental university seminars, programs, and research efforts. Appendices include information concerning the history, role,and interdependence of humanities, the social sciences, sciences, and ethics. (JHP) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]