DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Drought Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Drought Management Plan Draft Drought Management Plan Revised November 2017 South Staffs Water – Cambridge Region Drought Management Plan Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables ......................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Overview of the Process ........................................................................................................... 9 1.2 The Cambridge Region Drought Plan ..................................................................................... 10 1.3 Background To Cambridge Water .......................................................................................... 12 2. Consultation on the Drought Plan .................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Pre consultation ..................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Consultation on the Draft Plan ............................................................................................... 17 3. Water Resources in the Cambridge Region.................................................................................... 19 3.1 Supply Demand Balance Position ........................................................................................... 19 3.2 Levels of Service – Frequency of Restrictions ........................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Compensation .................................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Deployable Output ................................................................................................................. 22 3.4 Leakage Control ...................................................................................................................... 22 3.5 Water Efficiency ..................................................................................................................... 23 4 Drought Scenarios .......................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Historic Droughts .................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.1 1920s Drought Sequence ................................................................................................... 27 4.1.2 1972‐77 Drought Sequence ................................................................................................ 27 4.1.3 1988‐93 Drought Sequence ................................................................................................ 27 4.1.4 1995‐98 Drought Sequence ................................................................................................ 30 4.1.5 2003‐07 Drought Sequence ................................................................................................ 30 4.1.6 2011‐12 Drought Sequence ................................................................................................ 34 4.2 Drought Scenarios .................................................................................................................. 34 4.2.1 A Short Duration Drought .................................................................................................. 34 4.2.2 A Medium Duration Drought .............................................................................................. 35 4.2.3 A Long‐term Drought .......................................................................................................... 38 5 Drought Control Rules ‐ Triggers and Actions ................................................................................ 42 5.1 Groundwater and Rainfall Monitoring ................................................................................... 42 5.2 Drought Indicators .................................................................................................................. 45 5.3 Drought Triggers ..................................................................................................................... 45 6 Drought Management Actions ....................................................................................................... 51 6.1 Overview................................................................................................................................. 51 2 South Staffs Water – Cambridge Region Drought Management Plan 6.2.1 Leakage Reduction ............................................................................................................. 52 6.2.2 Temporary Water Use Restrictions .................................................................................... 52 6.2.2.2 Activities Covered by Restrictions ...................................................................................... 53 6.2.2.3 Implementation of Restrictions .......................................................................................... 54 6.2.2.4 Phased Introduction of Restrictions ................................................................................... 55 6.2.2.5 Concession and Exemptions ............................................................................................... 56 6.2.2.6 Communications ................................................................................................................. 58 6.2.2.7 Ordinary Drought Orders (Non‐Essential Use Restrictions) ............................................... 58 6.3 Supply‐side Actions ................................................................................................................ 60 6.3.1 Deployable Output ............................................................................................................. 60 6.3.2 Maintaining Existing Sources .............................................................................................. 61 6.3.3 Bulk Supplies....................................................................................................................... 62 6.3.4 Drought Orders and Permits .............................................................................................. 62 6.3.5 Potential Drought Permit Sites ........................................................................................... 62 6.3.6 Emergency Drought Orders ................................................................................................ 63 7 Environmental Impacts .................................................................................................................. 65 7.1 Environmental Assessment .................................................................................................... 65 7.2 Supply Side Option Assessment ............................................................................................. 68 7.2.1 Option S1: Re‐commission Fleam Dyke 12 Borehole ......................................................... 69 7.2.2 Option S2: Re‐commission Croydon PS .............................................................................. 70 7.2.3 Option S3: Re‐commission Kingston PS .............................................................................. 71 7.2.4 Option S4: Re‐commission St Ives PS ................................................................................. 71 7.3 Statutory Designated Sites ..................................................................................................... 72 7.4 Habitats Regulations Assessment .......................................................................................... 72 7.5 Strategic Environmental Assessment ..................................................................................... 73 7.6 NEP Investigations .................................................................................................................. 76 7.6.1 Previous Investigations ....................................................................................................... 76 7.6.2 River Granta ........................................................................................................................ 76 7.6.3 Nine Wells Local Nature Reserve (LNR) & Hobson’s Brook ................................................ 77 7.6.4 Cherry Hinton Brook ........................................................................................................... 77 8 Drought Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................................... 78 8.1 Overview................................................................................................................................. 78 8.2 Baseline Monitoring ............................................................................................................... 78 8.2.1 Meteorological and Hydrometric Monitoring .................................................................... 78 8.2.2 Ecological Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 79 3 South Staffs Water – Cambridge Region Drought Management Plan 8.3 Enhanced Monitoring Plan ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambridge Nature Network Final Report
    Cambridge Nature Network Final Report FOREWORD I’m delighted to introduce this important report. For years, now, we have known we need to ensure nature’s recovery, and for years that has been an all-too-elusive ambition. In fact, we are still overseeing nature’s decline. It’s a ship that simply must be turned around. Now we have a clear way forward. This report, building on the ambition to double nature in Cambridgeshire, tells us precisely how and where we can do it. Working from the ground up, looking at real places and the actual state of nature, it offers for the first time a tangible plan for the revitalisation of nature in the 10km around the city of Cambridge, based on what is already there and how it can be brought back to life. And there’s more. Fully integrated with the vision for nature recovery is one for the enhancement and creation of green spaces for public recreation and refreshment – vital needs, as we have come to understand fully during the covid-19 crisis. The risk with nature recovery is that in our enthusiasm we may do the wrong thing in the wrong place: plant trees on peat or valuable grassland, or put hedgerows in where the landscape should be open. This report will ensure we do the right thing in the right place. It provides a place-based analysis of where existing nature sites can be enhanced, what kind of nature-friendly farming to encourage, how to create stepping-stones to create new, linked nature networks, and how, overall, the ambition for doubling nature can be met.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation
    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stow-Cum-Quy
    STOW-CUM-QUY (Inset Proposals Map No. 87) 87.01 This section contains the detailed planning background, policies and proposals for this village. It must be read in conjunction with the general policies set out in Part I of the Local Plan and the accompanying village inset maps. Location 87.02 Stow-cum-Quy lies about 5 miles east of Cambridge north of the A14T to Newmarket, and close to the border with East Cambridgeshire. The B1102 runs north-westwards through the village on its way to Anglesey Abbey and Burwell. The Quy Water runs parallel to this road, further west. The parish covers 768 hectares. History and Settlement 87.03 The parish was once two separate parishes. It is bounded on the south by Fulbourn Fen and Quy Fen on the north. It is crossed from the south-west to the north-east by Quy Water which is landscaped through the grounds of Quy Hall. Quy Hall occupies the site of the Manor of Holme - a parish church was sited in the parkland near the cross roads. The settlement of Stow was centred around the parish church and the former Manor of Engayne. The roads of both parishes have been altered by improvements and a new bypass. 87.04 The parish church of St Mary dating from the 12th century has an 18th century wooden belfrey. Stow-cum-Quy Hall is an H-plan house rebuilt in the 19th century in the same style of the 16th century house. The park covers 60 hectares and includes an avenue which was increased in size at the time of the enclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Corporate Objectives of South Cambridgeshire District Council
    SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL CONTAMINATED LAND STRATEGY JULY 2001 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 2 3 Corporate Objectives of South Cambridgeshire District Council 3 4 Regulatory Context 4 4.1 Contaminated land regime 4 4.2 Other enforcement regimes 4 4.3 Definition of contaminated land 7 4.4 Principles of pollutant linkage 7 4.5 Principles of risk assessment 9 5 Roles and Responsibilities 10 5.1 Role of South Cambridgeshire District Council 10 5.2 Role of Environment Agency 10 5.3 Special sites 11 6 Development of the Strategy 12 6.1 Statutory requirements 12 6.2 Strategy production 12 7 Characteristics of South Cambridgeshire District Council area 13 7.1 Geographical location 13 7.2 Description and history of area 13 7.3 Details of South Cambridgeshire’s Ownership of Land and Property 15 7.4 Geology of south Cambridgeshire 15 7.5 Areas of naturally metal enriched soils 16 7.6 Hydrogeology of South Cambridgeshire 16 7.7 Water Resources 18 7.8 Protected locations 19 7.9 Current land use 20 7.10 Known information on contaminated land 20 8 Aims and Objectives 21 9 Priority Actions and Timescales 22 9.1 Site prioritisation methodology 22 9.2 Definition of Contaminant Source, Pathway and Receptor Data 23 9.3 Priorities for Inspection 24 10 Determining Liabilities and Securing Remediation 26 10.1 Remediation 26 ii 10.2 Voluntary remediation 27 10.3 Remediation notices 27 11 Liaison and Communication 29 11.1 Statutory Consultees 29 11.2 Non-statutory consultees 29 11.3 Communicating with owners, occupiers and other interested parties 30 11.4 Powers of entry 30 11.5 Enforcement action 31 11.6 Risk communication 31 11.7 Public register 32 11.8 Key contacts within the council 32 11.9 Provision of information to the Environment Agency 32 12 Information Management 34 13 Review Mechanisms 35 13.1 Triggers for undertaking inspection 35 13.2 Triggers for reviewing inspection decisions 35 13.3 Reviewing the strategy 35 Appendices 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crested Cow-Wheat in Trouble C
    Nature in Cambridgeshire No 55 2013 Plate 1 Riffle and kingfisher bank Plate 4 Restored ditch to give two-stage channel. Plate 2 Shoal creation through gravel placement Plate 5 Reed-bed two years after planting. Photographs by Rob Mungovan. See article on page 49 Plate 3 Log jam bank CONTENTS Muntjac Deer in Cambridgeshire Arnold Cooke 3 Crested Cow-wheat in trouble C. James Cadbury 22 The Hemiptera of Coe Fen, Cambridge Alex Dittrich, Alvin Helden, Rodi Mackzenie & Guy Belcher 32 Marsh Carpet moth larvae at Wicken Fen Norman Sills 37 Cambridgeshire Otter Survey – 2012 Peter Pilbeam 44 A Land Flatworm new to Britain Brian Eversham 46 River Cam Habitat Enhancement Project Rob Mungovan 49 Symphytum ´ perringianum in Cambridge Philip H. Oswald 57 A recovery programme for wetland plants at the Kingfishers Bridge Reserve Roger C. Beecroft, C. James Cadbury, & Stephen P. Tomkins 60 Contributions towards a new algal flora of Cambridgeshire:7. Rhodophyta. Hilary Belcher, Erica Swale and Eric George 71 Diptera of the Devil’s Ditch, Cambridgeshire I Perry 76 Lichens in the West Cambridgeshire woodlands Mark Powell, Louise Bacon and the Cambridge Lichen Group 87 Waterbeach Airfield and Barracks Louise Bacon 96 Trumpington Meadows CNHS Survey Jonathan Shanklin 100 A New Era for Cambridge University Herbarium Christine Bartram 108 Announcing a Fenland Flora Owen Mountford and Jonathan Graham 112 Green-flowered Helleborine in Cambridge Monica Frisch 116 Bourn Free Jess Hatchett, Ruth Hawksley & Vince Lea 118 Geodiversity Ken Rolfe 127 Additional Sulphur Clover populations Philippa M. Harding and Paul T. Harding 129 Sulphur Clover: a correction Louise Bacon 131 Vascular Plant Records Alan Leslie 131 Bryophyte records M.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Sites Where Regular Species Monitoring Activities Are Undertaken in Cambridgeshire & Peterborough
    Analysis of sites where regular species monitoring activities are undertaken in Cambridgeshire & Peterborough As part of our memorandum of agreement with Natural England and the Environment Agency for 2013-14, we have been asked to identify sites where individuals or groups are carrying out species surveys in a structured and repeated manner, whether as part of national monitoring programmes, or independently. We initiated the process by collating publicly-available sites in monitoring schemes such as the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS) or the British Trust for Ornithology’s (BTO) Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) and data provided by the Wildlife Trust for Cambridgeshire, Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire (WTBCN) from their reserve monitoring and Ecology Groups programmes. This collated list was then distributed to our county recorders and other naturalists, and numerous additions were then added by these individuals and organisations. A summary of the sites, taxa and method if known are presented overleaf. We aim to use this information as the basis for transferring the methods within currently monitored sites, and for widening the network of regular monitoring by promoting these survey methods to individuals and groups keen to learn and adopt such methods for their sites. We are also aware that the Cambridge Bryophyte Group survey across the whole county, and aim to revisit every site on a 10 year cycle. Similarly, the Cambridge Lichen group are resurveying sites visited in the 1960s and 19770s, especially churchyards, and then hope to try and revisit sites every 10 years, but this form of long-term surveillance is hard to document in the format presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature in Cambridgeshire No 49 2007
    Nature in Cambridgeshire No 49 2007 Plate 1 Sphaerium solidum from site 9, the New Bedford River near Mepal. (Note the difference in colour between the older grey and younger olive-yellow parts of the shell.) (scale: cm) Plate 2 Corbicula fluminea from site 9, the New Bedford River near Mepal. (scale: cm) (See article by Martin Willing, page 39) CONTENTS The current distribution of Green-winged Orchid Orchis morio L. in Huntingdonshire (vc31), the Soke of Peterborough (vc32) and old Cambridgeshire (vc29) Peter Stroh 3 The impact of a lack of grazing and lowered water-table on Cambridge Milk-parsley (Selinum carvifolia) and other plants at Sawston Hall Fen, Cambridgeshire C. James Cadbury and J. Owen Mountford 11 Saving Water Germander (Teucrium scordium) in Cambridgeshire Roger Beecroft, C. James Cadbury and J. Owen Mountford 21 Garden alien plants Graham Easy 24 Contributions towards a new algal flora of Cambridgeshire II Hilary Belcher, Eric George and Erica Swale 25 The history of the purchase of Hayley Wood, Cambridgeshire, for a nature reserve Donald Pigott 37 Sphaerium solidum and Corbicula fluminea: two rare bivalve molluscs in the River Great Ouse System in Cambridgeshire Martin J. Willing 39 A note on new records of the prawn Palaemon longirostris H. Milne Edwards, 1837 (Crustacea, Decapoda) in Cambridgeshire Martin J. Willing 49 Reed beetles Nick Millar 51 The spread of the harlequin ladybird in Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire Peter Brown, Helen Roy and Michael Majerus 55 Small rodent population dynamics in Madingley Wood, 1982-1993. Do warm winters and heavy tree fruiting promote more mice and voles? John R.
    [Show full text]
  • South Cambridgeshire District Council Contaminated Land Strategy
    South Cambridgeshire District Council Contaminated Land Strategy July 2001 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Background ................................................................................................................. 2 3. Corporate Objectives of South Cambridgeshire District Council ................................. 3 4. Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Contaminated Land regime ......................................................................................... 4 4.2 Other Enforcement Regimes ....................................................................................... 4 4.2.1 Planning and Development Control ........................................................................ 4 4.2.2 Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) and Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) ..... 5 4.2.3 Waste Management Licensing ................................................................................ 5 4.2.4 Statutory Nuisance .................................................................................................. 5 4.2.5 Water Resources Act 1991 ..................................................................................... 5 4.2.6 Radioactivity ........................................................................................................... 6 4.2.7 Food Safety ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nature in Cambridgeshire No 54 2012
    Nature in Cambridgeshire No 54 2012 Plate 1. Overall design and arrangement of planting types in Madingley 800 Wood. (See article on page 60) Plate 2. : An overview of Madingley 800 Wood in its fifth growing season (2011). (See article on page 60) CONTENTS Potamogeton compressus recolonises Cambridgeshire J.J. Graham & C.D. Preston 3 Marsh Stitchwort on Cambridgeshire’s washlands C. James Cadbury 11 Marsh Harriers breeding near Cambridge – continued Bob Jarman 17 Chinese Water Deer and Muntjac browsing at Woodwalton Fen NNR Arnold Cooke 21 Three annotated copies of Babington’s Flora of Cambridgeshire C.D. Preston 27 The Dingy Skipper on Devil’s Dyke Hilary Conlan 33 Plant species recorded by John Ray in Cambs. C.D. Preston & P.H. Oswald 36 Sulphur Clover; its decline in Cambridgeshire C. James Cadbury 44 Molluscs in the Cambridge Botanic Garden Richard C. Preece & Tom S. White 53 The lichens of Cambridge walls Mark Powell and the Cambridge Lichen Group 56 The Establishment of 800 Wood at Madingley Karen Russell, Rachel Buckingham Howard & Justin Mumford 60 The Backs: CNHS Field Studies area of 2011 Jonathan Shanklin 65 Vascular Plant Records Alan Leslie 71 Bryophyte records T.G.Charman and C.D. Preston 78 Invertebrate Records Louise Bacon 80 OBITUARIES 82 BOOK REVIEWS 84 Weather Summary for 2011 John Kapor 90 Cover Illustration: A Chinese Water Deer in a plot of sallow coppice at Woodwalton Fen National Nature Reserve Nature in Cambridgeshire’s website: www.natureincambridgeshire.org.uk Copies of Nature in Cambridgeshire may be obtained by writing to Nature in Cambridgeshire, c/o Museum of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ (price £7 plus postage and packing).
    [Show full text]
  • LSA) Estate Neighbourhood Plan
    Great Abington Parish Council Great Abington Former Land Settlement Association (LSA) Estate Neighbourhood Plan Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Screening Determination Statement 6 July 2017 Executive Summary This statement sets out the reasons for the determination that the draft Great Abington Former Land Settlement Association (LSA) Estate Neighbourhood Plan is unlikely to result in significant environmental effects and therefore does not require a Strategic Environmental Assessment. In addition this statement determines that the making of the Great Abington Former LSA Estate Neighbourhood Plan is not likely to have a significant effect on a European site. This determination statement is intended to demonstrate that the Great Abington Former LSA Estate Neighbourhood Plan is compatible with certain European Union obligations as required by the basic conditions, namely: Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment; and Article 6(3) and (4) of the EU Habitats Directive and with Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended). Great Abington Parish Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council will publish this determination statement in accordance with the regulatory requirements. Determination Statement This statement has been produced to ensure the Neighbourhood Plan will, when examined, comply with the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) in particular Regulation 32 and Regulation 15(1)e(ii) of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) (Amendment) Regulations 2015. A neighbourhood plan is required to meet a number of basic conditions (which are set out in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990), one of which being it must not breach and must be otherwise compatible with EU and Human Rights obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment Supplementary Planning Document
    East Cambridgeshire District Council Natural Environment – Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Adopted 24 September 2020 Contact: Strategic Planning team East Cambridgeshire District Council Email: [email protected] Tel: 01353 665555 East Cambridgeshire District Council – Natural Environment SPD: Adopted September 2020 A simple guide to this Natural Environment Supplementary Planning Document What is this document? Its primary purpose is to help make sure new development in East Cambridgeshire both protects the current natural environment, but also creates new areas for wildlife to thrive. Do we have many wildlife areas worthy of protection in East Cambridgeshire? Yes, lots! In fact, some parts of the district are of international importance for wildlife, whilst other sites are of national or local importance. Internationally important? That’s exciting. Why are they so important? For various reasons, but mostly it relates to surviving wetland areas in our district which are home to rare plants, birds and other animals. Wicken Fen is probably the best known, and home to all kinds of rare plants and animals (8,500 different species have been recorded, including over 1,000 different species of moths!), whereas in the north of the district the Ouse Washes (the UKs biggest washland) is especially important for birds. For example, around one-third of the entire population of north-west Europe Bewick Swans spend their winter on the Ouse Washes. And nationally important in East Cambs? We have a further 15 sites of national importance, and hundreds of sites of more local importance. So, this document protects these sites does it? Yes, absolutely, this document provides a vital role in helping to both highlight the importance of these sites and to make sure new development does not harm them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wetland Framework for Impact Assessment at Statutory Sites in Eastern England Site Accounts
    A WETLAND FRAMEWORK FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT AT STATUTORY SITES IN EASTERN ENGLAND SITE ACCOUNTS R&D Technical Report W6-068/TR2 B.D. Wheeler & S.C. Shaw Wetlands Research Group University of Sheffield Sheffield, S10 2TN Publishing Organisation Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 ISBN: 1 8570 5563 2. © Environment Agency 2000 This report is the result of work jointly funded by the Environment Agency and the University of Sheffield. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Environment Agency. Its officers, servants or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance upon views contained herein. Dissemination status Internal: Released to Regions External: Released to Public Domain Statement of Use This document provides an assessment and summary of the ecohydrogeological characteristics of the wetland sites included in the project. The project provides guidance to Environment Agency staff and external agencies involved in hydrological and ecological impact assessment under the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations, 1994. For full details of the project, refer to R&D Technical Report W6- 068/TR1. Research Contractor This document was produced under R&D Project W6-068 by: The Wetlands Research Group, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN Tel: 0114 222 0000 Fax: 0114 222 0002 Environment Agency Project Manager The Environment Agency’s Project Manager for R&D Project W6-068 was: Mark Whiteman - Environment Agency Anglian Region R&D PROJECT RECORD W6-068/TR2 Appendix 3 CONTENTS Page 1.
    [Show full text]