Trees, Shrubs & Perennials for Attracting Birds And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
P L a N T L I S T Water-Wise Trees and Shrubs for the High Plains
P L A N T L I S T Water-Wise Trees and Shrubs for the High Plains By Steve Scott, Cheyenne Botanic Gardens Horticulturist 03302004 © Cheyenne Botanic Gardens 2003 710 S. Lions Park Dr., Cheyenne WY, 82001 www.botanic.org The following is a list of suitable water-wise trees and shrubs that are suitable for water- wise landscaping also known as xeriscapes. Many of these plants may suffer if they are placed in areas receiving more than ¾ of an inch of water per week in summer. Even drought tolerant trees and shrubs are doomed to failure if grasses or weeds are growing directly under and around the plant, especially during the first few years. It is best to practice tillage, hoeing, hand pulling or an approved herbicide to kill all competing vegetation for the first five to eight years of establishment. Avoid sweetening the planting hole with manure or compost. If the soil is needs improvement, improve the whole area, not just the planting hole. Trees and shrubs generally do best well with no amendments. Many of the plants listed here are not available in department type stores. Your best bets for finding these plants will be in local nurseries- shop your hometown first! Take this list with you. Encourage nurseries and landscapers to carry these plants! For more information on any of these plants please contact the Cheyenne Botanic Gardens (307-637-6458), the Cheyenne Forestry Department (307-637-6428) or your favorite local nursery. CODE KEY- The code key below will assist you in selecting for appropriate characteristics. -
CBA/ABC Bulletin 35(1)
THE CANADIAN BOTANICAL ASSOCIATION BULLETIN DE LASSOCIATION BOTANIQUE DU CANADA February / février 2002 35(1) Montréal Patron / Président d'honneur Her Excellency the Right Honourable / Son excellence la très honorable Adrienne Clarkson, C.C., C.M.M., C.D. Governor General of Canada / Gouverneure générale du Canada On the inside / À l'intérieur I Presidents Message I This issue of the bulletin is the last one to be produced by Denis Lauzer. I am sure you will all agree that Denis has done a wonderful job bringing us all up to date on the current happenings in our Association. Thank you, Denis, for all the 2 Page time you have invested producing such an excellent publication. Editors / La rédaction CBA Section and Committee Chairs The next issue of the Bulletin will be produced in Edmundston, NB, under the direction of our new Editor, Martin Dubé. We look forward to the continued production of an informative and interesting Bulletin under his editorship. Page 3 Plans are being finalized for our next Annual Meeting (August 4-7), to be President's Message (continued) held at the Pyle Conference Center on the campus of the University of Wisconsin Macoun Travel Boursary in Madison, Wisconsin. The deadline for submission of abstracts is now estab- 2002 CBA Annual Meeting / lished (April 1, 2002) and we now have a list of planned Symposia. The subject Congrès annuel de l'ABC 2002 of the Plenary Symposium is Evolution: Highlighting Plants, organized by Patricia Gensel. Sectional Symposia of the Botanical Socie ty of America (with input from Page 4 CBA Sections) include the following: Poorly Known Economic Plants of Canada - 32. -
Evaluation of Antioxidant Properties of Native Utah Berries and Their Potential for Use in Meats
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2018 Evaluation of Antioxidant Properties of Native Utah Berries and Their Potential for Use in Meats Xiaoxi Wang Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Nutrition Commons Recommended Citation Wang, Xiaoxi, "Evaluation of Antioxidant Properties of Native Utah Berries and Their Potential for Use in Meats" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7331. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7331 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i EVALUATION OF ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES OF NATIVE UTAH BERRIES AND THEIR POTENTIAL FOR USE IN MEATS by Xiaoxi Wang A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Nutrition and Food Sciences Approved: ____________________________ ____________________________ Karin Allen, Ph.D. Brain Nummer, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ___________________________ ____________________________ Silvana Martini, Ph.D. Marie Walsh, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member ____________________________ ____________________________ Sean Johnson, Ph.D. Laurens H. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member Interim Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Xiaoxi Wang 2018 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Evaluation of Antioxidant Properties of Native Utah Berries and Their Potential for use in Meats by Xiaoxi Wang, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2017 Major Professor: Dr. -
Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus. -
Phylogenetic Relationships in Korean Elaeagnus L. Based on Nrdna ITS Sequences
Korean J. Plant Res. 27(6):671-679(2014) Print ISSN 1226-3591 http://dx.doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2014.27.6.671 Online ISSN 2287-8203 Original Research Article Phylogenetic Relationships in Korean Elaeagnus L. Based on nrDNA ITS Sequences OGyeong Son1, Chang Young Yoon2 and SeonJoo Park1* 1Department of Life Science, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea 2Department of Biotechnology, Shingyeong University, Hwaseon 445-741, Korea Abstract - Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Korean Elaeagnus L. were conducted using seven species, one variety, one forma and four outgroups to evaluate their relationships and phylogeny. The sequences of internal transcribed spacer regions in nuclear ribosomal DNA were employed to construct phylogenetic relationships using maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian analysis. Molecular phylogenetic analysis revealed that Korean Elaeagnus was a polyphyly. E. umbellata var. coreana formed a subclade with E. umbellata. Additionally, the genetic difference between E. submacrophylla and E. macrophylla was very low. Moreover, E. submacrophylla formed a branch from E. macrophylla, indicating that E. submacrophylla can be regarded as a variety. However, several populations of this species were not clustered as a single clade; therefore, further study should be conducted using other molecular markers. Although E. glabra f. oxyphylla was distinct in morphological characters of leaf shape with E. glabra. But E. glabra f. oxyphylla was formed one clade by molecular phylogenetic with E. glabra. Additionally, this study clearly demonstrated that E. pungens occurs in Korea, although it was previously reported near South Korea in Japan and China. According to the results of ITS regions analyses, it showed a resolution and to verify the relationship between interspecies of Korean Elaeagnus. -
Designing Hardwood Tree Plantings for Wildlife Brian J
FNR-213 Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University Designing Hardwood Tree Plantings for Wildlife Brian J. MacGowan, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University Woody plants can be of value to many wildlife species. The species of tree or shrub, or the location, size, and shape of planting can all have an impact on wildlife. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the benefits of trees and shrubs for wildlife and how to design tree and shrub plantings for wildlife. Some of the practices may conflict with other management goals and may have to be modified for individual priorities. Trees and Shrubs for Wildlife The species you select for a tree planting should depend on the growing conditions of the site and the wildlife species that you want to manage. Talk to a professional forester to help you select the tree species best suited for your growing conditions. A professional biologist, such as a Department of Natural Resources District Biologist (www.in.gov/ food source for wildlife (Table 2). Shrubs can be dnr/fishwild/huntguide1/wbiolo.htm), can assist you particularly important because several species of with planning a tree planting for wildlife. wildlife, especially songbirds, prefer to feed or nest There is no specific formula for developing wild- on or near the ground. Shrubs also provide good life habitat. For example, acorns are eaten by a wide protective cover for these types of wildlife. Pines variety of wildlife species including tree squirrels, and other softwoods provide limited food, but are an pheasants, wild turkey, and deer. -
Crataegus in Ohio with Description of One New Species
CRATAEGUS IN OHIO WITH DESCRIPTION OF ONE NEW SPECIES ERNEST J. PALMER Webb City, Missouri This review of Crataegus in Ohio has been made in cooperation with the Ohio Flora Committee of the Ohio Academy of Science as a contribution to their forth- coming flora of the state. Many of the universities and colleges of the state have sent collections of herbarium specimens to me for examination, and information has been drawn from these and other sources including some private collections. The large collection in the herbarium of the Ohio State University, covering most of the state, has been particularly helpful. Other institutions sending large col- lections were the University of Cincinnati, Oberlin College, Miami University, and Defiance College. Dr. E. Lucy Braun also sent many interesting collections from her private herbarium; and she has given invaluable assistance in outlining the work and in cooperating with it in many ways. In addition to the larger collections mentioned above, specimens have been received from Ohio University, Dennison University, Kent State University, Antioch College, and from the private collection of Mr. John Guccion of Cleveland. Dr. Gerald B. Ownbey also sent a number of collections from Ohio deposited in the herbarium of the University of Minnesota. The large amount of material from Ohio in the her- barium of the Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, was also checked, including duplicates of many of the collections seen in Ohio herbaria, and also fuller collections made by R. E. Horsey in many parts of the state, and by F. J. Tyler, Harry Crowfoot, and C. -
Silver Buffaloberry
Silver Buffaloberry slide 4a 400% slide 4b 360% slide 4c slide 4d 360% 360% III-5 Silver Buffaloberry Environmental Requirements (Shepherdia argentea) Soils Soil Texture - Grows well in most soils. Soil pH - 5.5 to 8.0. Adapted to moderately alkaline and General Description saline soils. A tall, thorny, thicket-forming native shrub. Well adapted Windbreak Suitability Group - 1, 1K, 3, 4, 4C, 5, 6D, 6G, 8, to dry, moderately alkaline and saline soils. Tolerates 9C, 9L. infertile soils, in part because of its ability to fix and assimilate atmospheric nitrogen. Berries used for jellies. Cold Hardiness USDA Zone - 2. Leaves and Buds Bud Arrangement - Opposite. Water Drought tolerant. Not adapted to wet, poorly-drained Bud Color - Silvery. sites. Bud Size - Small, solitary or multiple, stalked, oblong. Leaf Type and Shape - Simple, oblong-elliptical. Light Leaf Margins - Entire. Full sun. Leaf Surface - Finely-scaled, pubescent. Uses Leaf Length - 1 to 2 inches. Leaf Width - 1/4 to 5/8 inch. Conservation/Windbreaks Leaf Color - Silvery-gray on both surfaces. Medium to tall shrub for farmstead and field windbreaks, riparian plantings, and highway beautification. Flowers and Fruits Flower Type - Dioecious. Wildlife Highly important for mule deer browse. Ideal cover and Flower Color - Yellowish. nesting site for many birds. Preferred food source of many Fruit Type - Drupe-like, insipid, ovoid. songbirds and sharptail grouse. Good late winter food Fruit Color - Predominately red, however, some female source for birds. plants can produce yellow fruits. Agroforestry Products Form Food - Fruit processed as jams and jellies. Growth Habit - Loosely branched shrub of rounded outline. Urban/Recreational Ornamental foliage and fruit, but limited in use because of Texture - Medium-fine, summer; fine, winter. -
Missouriensis Volume 28 / 29
Missouriensis Volume 28/29 (2008) In this issue: Improved Status of Auriculate False Foxglove (Agalinis auriculata) in Missouri in 2007 Tim E. Smith, Tom Nagel, and Bruce Schuette ......................... 1 Current Status of Yellow False Mallow (Malvastrum hispidum) in Missouri Tim E. Smith.................................................................................... 5 Heliotropium europaeum (Heliotropiaceae) New to Missouri Jay A. Raveill and George Yatskievych ..................................... 10 Melica mutica (Poaceae) New for the Flora of Missouri Alan E. Brant ................................................................................. 18 Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) New to Missouri Timothy E. Vogt and Paul M. McKenzie ................................. 22 Flora of Galloway Creek Nature Park, Howell County, Missouri Bill Summers .................................................................................. 27 Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Missouriensis, Volume 28/29 2008 1 IMPROVED STATUS OF AURICULATE FALSE FOXGLOVE (AGALINIS AURICULATA) IN MISSOURI IN 2007 Tim E. Smith Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0180 Tom Nagel Missouri Department of Conservation 701 James McCarthy Drive St. Joseph, MO 64507-2194 Bruce Schuette Missouri Department of Natural Resources Cuivre River State Park 678 State Rt. 147 Troy, MO 63379 Populations of annual plant species are known to have periodic “boom” and “bust” years as well as years when plant numbers more closely approach long-term averages. In tracking populations of plant species of conservation concern (Missouri Natural Heritage Program, 2007), there are sometimes also boom years in the number of reports of new populations. Because of reports of five new populations and a surge in numbers of plants at some previously-known sites, 2007 provided encouraging news for the conservation of the auriculate false foxglove [Agalinis auriculata (Michx.) Blake] in Missouri. -
Russian Olive Vs. Silverleaf Buffaloberry (Elaeagnus Angustifolia Vs
Russian Olive vs. Silverleaf Buffaloberry (Elaeagnus angustifolia vs. Shepherdia argentea) Russian olive is closely related to silveleaf buffaloberry. At first glance these two relatives appear very similar. They grow in common places, have thorns, and can take on shrub-like forms. However, upon closer inspection you will find several differences between these species. Silverleaf Russian olive (invasive) Buffaloberry VS (native) Leaves Leaves Arranged in alternate pairs; Arranged in opposite pairs; useful memory trick: invasive useful memory trick: nave has UNBALANCED arrangement has BALANCED arrangement 0.8‐4” long and 0.4‐1.6” wide 1‐2” long and about 3/8” wide Upper surface green‐gray; lower Silvery on both top and boom surface silvery‐gray Leaves emerge 1‐2 weeks aer flowering Chris Evans, Illinois Wildlife Acon Plan, Bugwood.org Flowers Flowers hp://prairieform.com/ Yellow, bell shaped flower clus‐ Small yellow flower clusters; ters; appear between May and appear April to mid‐late summer June Insect pollinated; esp. aracve Insect pollinated to honey bees and bumble bees Male and female flowers on Male and female flowers on separate plants separate plants Flowers lack petals and have 4 Male flowers are longer (2‐3 petal‐like sepals and 4 stamens mm) and have 8 stamens John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy; Bugword.org Photo ©Al Schneider, www.swcoloradowildflowers.com Fruit Fruit Newly‐formed fruits are silver Fruit yellow or light orange in but become tan or brown as early summer; turn red later in they mature season Shaped like small olives; contain Fruit drupe shaped; contain a single seed single seed Eaten by over 50 species of bird Important food source for many or wildlife, 12 of them being birds and animals including mule game birds deer, bears, rodents and several bird species Jan Samanek, State Phytosanitary Administraon, Bug‐ wood.org Photo ©Al Schneider, www.swcoloradowildflowers.com Russian Olive vs. -
Ecological Site R058AC619MT Saline Subirrigated (Ssb) RRU 58A-C 11-14" P.Z
Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site R058AC619MT Saline Subirrigated (SSb) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Accessed: 09/26/2021 General information Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site. Figure 1. Mapped extent Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated. Similar sites R058AC043MT Wet Meadow (WM) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. The Wet Meadow site differs mainly by being wet at or near the surface for most of the growing season. R058AC618MT Saline Overflow (SOv) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. The Saline Overflow site differs mainly by being associated with ephemeral streams and having no permanent water table. R058AC044MT Subirrigated (Sb) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. The Subirrigated site differs mainly by not being salt affected. Table 1. Dominant plant species Tree Not specified Shrub (1) Shepherdia argentea (2) Sarcobatus vermiculatus Herbaceous (1) Spartina gracilis (2) Sporobolus airoides Physiographic features This ecological site occurs on subirrigated lands where salt and/or alkali accumulations are apparent and salt-tolerant species dominate the plant community. This site can also occur around pond margins, particularly if the water recedes (e.g., drawdown zone) but a permanent water table is maintained. Slopes are mainly less than 4 percent, and aspect is not significant. -
Reference Plant List
APPENDIX J NATIVE & INVASIVE PLANT LIST The following tables capture the referenced plants, native and invasive species, found throughout this document. The Wildlife Action Plan Team elected to only use common names for plants to improve the readability, particular for the general reader. However, common names can create confusion for a variety of reasons. Common names can change from region-to-region; one common name can refer to more than one species; and common names have a way of changing over time. For example, there are two widespread species of greasewood in Nevada, and numerous species of sagebrush. In everyday conversation generic common names usually work well. But if you are considering management activities, landscape restoration or the habitat needs of a particular wildlife species, the need to differentiate between plant species and even subspecies suddenly takes on critical importance. This appendix provides the reader with a cross reference between the common plant names used in this document’s text, and the scientific names that link common names to the precise species to which writers referenced. With regards to invasive plants, all species listed under the Nevada Revised Statute 555 (NRS 555) as a “Noxious Weed” will be notated, within the larger table, as such. A noxious weed is a plant that has been designated by the state as a “species of plant which is, or is likely to be, detrimental or destructive and difficult to control or eradicate” (NRS 555.05). To assist the reader, we also included a separate table detailing the noxious weeds, category level (A, B, or C), and the typical habitats that these species invade.