Mobilizing U.S. Industry in World War II: Myth and Reality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mobilizing U.S. Industry in World War II: Myth and Reality M C H A~ R ~A I? ~ ! 50 obilizing U.S. Industry in World War II Alan L. Gropman r A popular Government, without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. JAMES MADISON to W. T. BARRY August 4, 1822 MOBILIZING U.S. INDUSTRY IN WORLD WAR I1: MYTH AND REALITY Alan L. Gropman McNair Paper 50 August 1996 INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY Washington, DC NATI()NAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY [] President: Lieutenant General Ervin J. Rokke, USAF [] Vice President: Ambassador Willi~un G. Walker INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES [] Director & Publisher: Dr. Hans A. Binnendijk Publications Directorate & NDU Press Fort Lesley J. McNair, W,'tshington, DC 20319-6000 [] Phone: (202) 685-421(] [] Facsimile: (202) 685-4806 [] Director & Managing Editor: Dr. Frederick T. Kiley [] Vice Director & General Editor: Major Thom~Ls W. Krise, USAF [] Chief, Editorial & Publications Branch: Mr. George C. Maerz [] Senior Editor: Ms. Mary A. Sommerville [] Editor: Mr. Jonath:m W. Pierce [] Editor for this issue: Ms. Mary A. Sommerville [] Distribution Manager: Mrs. Myrna Myers [] Secretary: Mrs. Laura Hall From time to time, INSS publishes McN~dr Papers to provoke thought ,'rod inform discussion on issues of U.S. national security in the post-Cold W:tr era. These monographs present current topics related to national security strategy ,and policy, defense resource m~magemcnt, international affairs, civil-milit~u'y relations, military technology, and joint, combined, and coalition operations. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations, expressed or implied, are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of ttw National Defense Hniversity, ttw Department of Defi, nse, or any other U.S. Government agency. Cleared for public reh, ase; distrihution unlimited. Portions of this publication may be quoted or reprinted without further permission, with credit to the Institute for National Strategic Studies, W~tshington, DC. A courtesy copy of reviews and tearsheets would he appreciated. For sale by the II.,S. (;overnment lhinting Office Superintendent of D,~cuments, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washingt,n, I)(" 204(12-9328 ISSN 1071-7552 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ..................... 1 2. MOBILIZATION ACTIVITIES BEFORE PEARL HARBOR DAY ...................... 9 3. EDUCATION FOR MOBILIZATION ....... 15 4. INTERWAR PLANNING FOR INDUSTRIAL MOBILIZATION ..................... 19 5. MOBILIZING FOR WAR: 1939TO 1941 ... 31 6. THE WAR PRODUCTION BOARD ....... 55 7. THE CONTROLLED MATERIALS PLAN .. 69 8. THE OFFICE OF WAR MOBILIZATION AND RECONVERSION ............... 83 9. U.S. PRODUCTION IN WORLD WAR II . 93 10. BALANCING MILITARY AND CIVILIAN NEEDS ................... 107 11. OVERCOMING RAW MATERIAL SCARCITIES ...................... 115 12. MARITIME CONSTRUCTION ........... 123 13. PEOPLE MOBILIZATION: "Rosie the Riveter" . ................. 127 14. CONCLUSIONS .................... 139 APPENDIX A: Production of Selected Munitions Items .................... 141 APPENDIX B: The War Agencies of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government ....... 147 ABOUT THE AUTHOR .................. 167 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I was most fortunate to be assisted by many people while writing this account of World War II U.S. Industrial Mobilization. Five people in particular stand out. Dr. Gary E. Weir of the Naval Historical Center provided very wise counsel. Mr. Terrance J. Gough of the Anny's Center of Military History was especially supportive in his analysis of all of the drafts, continually broadening my research anti making me reevaluate my inquiry. I also received essential help from Ms. Sarah Mikel's ace reference librarian, Rosemary Marlowe-Dziuk, of the National Defense University Library. Ms. Marlowe-Dziuk llas that indispensable quality common only to great librarians---curiosity. All my research problems became hers. I also owe a debt of gratitude--as even the most casual reader will notice--to the graphics office at the National Defense lJniversity. Don Barry and Alex Contreras assigned Ms. Nancy Bressi to assist me in developing the visual aids in this numbers-reliant essay. Ms. Bressi has the soul of an artist and the temperament of Job. My chief adviser in this effort was Mr. Thomas Candon, a young graduate student wise and mature beyond his years. Mr. Candon read and critiqued every draft and checked all the data displayed in the numerous charts. Without Mr. Candon's wise advice and assistance, this treatise would have been markedly inferior. Of course, I bear responsibility for all errors of fact and judgment--probably arising because I failed Io heed the sage advice of Dr. Weir and Mr. Gough and the sagacious suggestions of Mr. Candon. V MOBILIZING U.S. INDUSTRY IN WORLD WAR I1: MYTH AND REALITY • INTRODUCTION At a dinner during the Teheran Conference in December 1943, Joseph St;din praised United States manufacturing: I w,'mt to tell you from the Russi~m point of view, what the President ;rod the United States have done to win the w~tr. The most import;rot things in this war are machines. The United States has proven ttutt it c;m turn out from 8,000 to 10,000 airpl~mes per month. Russia c~m only turn out, at most. 3,000 airpl~mes a month .... The United States, therefore, is a country of machines. Without the use of those machines, through Lend-Le&se, we would lose this wal-. 1 It was more than airplaJ~es, of course. The Soviets received, in addition to thousands of tanks and airplanes, hundreds of thousands of trucks from the United States, which vastly enhanced the mobility of the Soviet ground forces. The United States also supplied St',din's factories wilh millions of tons of raw materials and thousands of machine tools to assist the Soviet Union in manufacturing trucks and all the other implements of modem war including tmlks. 2 World War II was won in largest part because of superior allied am~aments production, s The IJnited States greatly outproduced all its "allies and "all its enemies and, at its output 2 MOBILIZING U.S. INDUSTRY IN WORLD WAR II peak in late 1943 and early 1944, was manufacturing munitions almost equal to the combined tt)t',d tff both its friends mid adversaries. The prodigious arms manufacturing capability of the United States is well known by even casual readers of World War II history, if its decisiveness is not as well understood. But myths provoked by sentimentality regarding United States munitions production have evolved in the half century since the war ended, and these have become a barrier to comprehending the lessons of that era. When viewed in isolation the output is indeed impressive. United States Gross National Product grew by 52 percent between 1939 and 1944 (nmch more in unadjusted dollars), munitions production skyrocketed from virtually nothing in 1939 to unprecedented levels, industrial output tripled, and even consumer spending increased (unique among all combatants). But United States industrial production was neither a "miracle" nor was its output comparatively prodigious given the American advantages of abundant raw materials, superb transportation and technological infrastructure, a large and skilled labor force, and, most importantly, two large ocean barriers to bar bombing of its industries. 4 Germany, once it abandoned its Blitzkrieg strategy, increased its productivity more than the United States, Britain, mad the Soviet Union, and despite German attacks on Britain and the Soviet Union, these states performed outstandingly too. 5 This is not to say that United States logistics grand strategy 6 was not ultimately effective. The United States anti its allies were, of course, victorious, and we lost far fewer lives than m~y of our adversaries and fewer than our main "allies. Stalin was correct when he hailed American production. But the halo that has surrounded the era needs to be examined because there were enormous govenunental, supervisory, labor-management relations] and domestic politicai frictions that hampered the effort--and there is no reason to think that these problems would not handicap future mobilization efforts. With enormous threats looming in the mid 1930s and increasing as Europe exploded into war at the end of the decade, the United States was in no way unified in its perception of the hazards, nor was there any unity in government or business about what to do about it. 8 In the end, America and its allies were triumphant, and logistics played the ALAN L. GROPMAN 3 decisive role, but the mobilization could have been more efficient and America could have produced more munitions more quickly and perhaps have ended the war sooner. A nostalgic look at United States industrial mobilization during World War 11 will not make future mobilizations of any size more effective. Certainly none of the major World War II adversaries was less prepared for war in 1939 than the United States. There were fewer than 200,000 men in the Army, only 125,200 in the Navy, and fewer than 20,000 in the Marine Corps. Those troops on maneuvers in 1939 and 1940 used broomsticks to simulate rifles and trucks to represent tanks. 9 Despite war orders from Britain and France in 1939 and 1940 and Lend-Lease shipments to Britain, the Soviet Union, China and elsewhere ",ffter Lend-Lease took effect in March 1941, there were still five million Americans unemployed at tile end of the year. ~° Hitler's Germany had long since absorbed its unemployment by building arms and German infrastructure. In the United States, great progress had been made by the time production peaked in late 1943, compared with the situation in 1941, but output could have been even higher. The fact that it took from August 1939, when the first federal agency designed to analyze mobilization options--theWar Resources Board--was inaugurated, to May 1943, when the final supervisory agency was put in place--the Office of War Mobilization--should be instructive.
Recommended publications
  • The Pillars of American Grand Strategy in World War II by Tami Davis Biddle
    Leveraging Strength: The Pillars of American Grand Strategy in World War II by Tami Davis Biddle Tami Davis Biddle is the Hoyt S. Vandenberg Chair of Aerospace Studies at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, PA. She is the author of Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Thinking about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945, and is at work on a new book titled, Taking Command: The United States at War, 1944–1945. This article is based on a lecture she delivered in March 2010 in The Hertog Program on Grand Strategy, jointly sponsored by Temple University’s Center for Force and Diplomacy, and FPRI. Abstract: This article argues that U.S. leaders navigated their way through World War II challenges in several important ways. These included: sustaining a functional civil-military relationship; mobilizing inside a democratic, capitalist paradigm; leveraging the moral high ground ceded to them by their enemies; cultivating their ongoing relationship with the British, and embra- cing a kind of adaptability and resiliency that facilitated their ability to learn from mistakes and take advantage of their enemies’ mistakes. ooking back on their World War II experience from the vantage point of the twenty-first century, Americans are struck, first of all, by the speed L with which everything was accomplished: armies were raised, fleets of planes and ships were built, setbacks were overcome, and great victories were won—all in a mere 45 months. Between December 1941 and August 1945, Americans faced extraordinary challenges and accepted responsibilities they had previously eschewed.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL PHOTOGRAPHS File Subject Index
    GENERAL PHOTOGRAPHS File Subject Index A (General) Abeokuta: the Alake of Abram, Morris B.: see A (General) Abruzzi: Duke of Absher, Franklin Roosevelt: see A (General) Adams, C.E.: see A (General) Adams, Charles, Dr. D.F., C.E., Laura Franklin Delano, Gladys, Dorothy Adams, Fred: see A (General) Adams, Frederick B. and Mrs. (Eilen W. Delano) Adams, Frederick B., Jr. Adams, William Adult Education Program Advertisements, Sears: see A (General) Advertising: Exhibits re: bill (1944) against false advertising Advertising: Seagram Distilleries Corporation Agresta, Fred Jr.: see A (General) Agriculture Agriculture: Cotton Production: Mexican Cotton Pickers Agriculture: Department of (photos by) Agriculture: Department of: Weather Bureau Agriculture: Dutchess County Agriculture: Farm Training Program Agriculture: Guayule Cultivation Agriculture: Holmes Foundry Company- Farm Plan, 1933 Agriculture: Land Sale Agriculture: Pig Slaughter Agriculture: Soil Conservation Agriculture: Surplus Commodities (Consumers' Guide) Aircraft (2) Aircraft, 1907- 1914 (2) Aircraft: Presidential Aircraft: World War II: see World War II: Aircraft Airmail Akihito, Crown Prince of Japan: Visit to Hyde Park, NY Akin, David Akiyama, Kunia: see A (General) Alabama Alaska Alaska, Matanuska Valley Albemarle Island Albert, Medora: see A (General) Albright, Catherine Isabelle: see A (General) Albright, Edward (Minister to Finland) Albright, Ethel Marie: see A (General) Albright, Joe Emma: see A (General) Alcantara, Heitormelo: see A (General) Alderson, Wrae: see A (General) Aldine, Charles: see A (General) Aldrich, Richard and Mrs. Margaret Chanler Alexander (son of Charles and Belva Alexander): see A (General) Alexander, John H. Alexitch, Vladimir Joseph Alford, Bradford: see A (General) Allen, Mrs. Idella: see A (General) 2 Allen, Mrs. Mary E.: see A (General) Allen, R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Planning in World War II
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Rockoff, Hugh Working Paper The Paradox of Planning in World War II Working Paper, No. 1995-13 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, Rutgers University Suggested Citation: Rockoff, Hugh (1996) : The Paradox of Planning in World War II, Working Paper, No. 1995-13, Rutgers University, Department of Economics, New Brunswick, NJ This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/94307 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 95-13 April 1996 The Paradox of Planning in the United States during World War II* Hugh Rockoff Department of Economics Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ 08903-5055 908-932-7857 For Discussion Only I.
    [Show full text]
  • 9Th Grade Textbook Packet
    To defeat Japanese in the military during the war, including 350,000 women. ITALY AND GERMANY In 1922, and Italian fascism, the United States mobilized all i~periilism and German former journalist Benito Mussolini ,.foe massive government spending required to wage ofits economic resources. and 40,000 of his black-shirted sup­ nd wrenched the economy out ofthe total war boosted industrial production a porters seized control of Italy, taking Great Depression. advantage of a paralyzed political sys­ Four years after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States and its allies tem incapable of dealing with wide­ in the cos!!_iest and most destructive war in history. Cit­ emerged victorious spread unemployment, runaway d, nations dismembered, and societies transformed. More ies were destroye inflation, mass strikes, and fears of million people were killed in the war between 1939 and 1945-per­ than 50 communism. By 1925, Mussolini was ofthem civilians, including millions ofJews and other ethnic haps 60 percent wielding dictatorial power;:s "Il Duce" eath camps and Soviet concentration camps. minorities in Nazi d (the Leader). He called his version -of and scale of the Second World War ended America's tra­ The global scope antisociali~ totalitarian nationalism ofisolationism. By 1945, the United States was the world's most power­ dition Jascisn1, All political parties except the and global responsibilitie~. The war ful nation, with new international interests Fascists were eliminated, and several in Europe and Asia that the Soviet Union and the United left power vacuums political opponents were murdered. fill to protect their military, economic, and political interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Materials in the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library
    HISTORICAL MATERIALS IN THE FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION April 2011 FOREWORD It seems to me that the dedication of a library is in itself an act of faith. To bring together the records of the past and to house them in buildings where they will be preserved for the use of men and women in the future, a Nation must believe in three things. It must believe in the past. It must believe in the future. It must, above all, believe in the capacity of its own people so to learn from the past that they can gain in judgement in creating their own future. ...This latest addition to the archives of America is dedicated at a moment when government of the people by themselves is being attacked everywhere. It is, therefore, proof - if any proof is needed - that our confidence in the future of democracy has not diminished in this Nation and will not diminish. Franklin D. Roosevelt Remarks at the dedication of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library. June 30, 1941 This is a list of holdings of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library. Included are the President's personal and family papers, papers covering his public career at the state and national level, those of Eleanor Roosevelt, as well as those of many of his associates in public and private life. The Library, a gift to the American people from the President, had its beginnings in 1939 when Franklin Roosevelt turned over to the Government 16 acres of the family estate at Hyde Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustana College
    Augustana College HIST 315 Concepts addressed: The Second World War and the Post War Period 1939-1963 Timeline: The Road to World War II 1931 Japanese invasion of Manchuria 1933 Hitler took power in Germany 1934-37 Nye Committee 1935 Italy's invasion of Ethiopia 1937 Japan's invasion of China 9/1/1939 German invasion of Poland 1940 Fall of France 1940 Roosevelt's election to a third term 1941 Lend-Lease program began 1941 Germany's invasion of Russia 1941 Japanese extend protectorate over Indochina 12/7/1941 Attack on Pearl Harbor Period Goals & Key Concepts: Road to War • Understand the US role in the broader policy of appeasement. • Trace US neutrality and the gradual evidence of wartime aid and involvement. • Explain the election of 1940 in the context of neutrality. • Detail the attack on Peal Harbor and the subsequent US reactions. Timeline: WWII 1941 War Powers Act passed 1942 War Production Board established 1942 Revenue Act of 1942 May 1942 Battle of the Coral Sea June 1942 Battle of Midway Nov. 1942 U.S. North Africa campaign launched 1/1943 Casablanca Conference July 1943 U.S. troops land in Sicily 11-12/1943 Teheran Conference 6/6/1944 D-Day Invasion 2/1945 Yalta Conference 4/12/1945 FDR died and Truman inaugurated 5/8/1945 V-E Day July 1945 Potsdam Conference 8/6/1945 Atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima 9/2/1945 Japan surrendered [V-J Day] Period Goals & Key Concepts: The War • Describe and understand the differing strategies of Axis and Allies. Development of this review sheet was made possible by funding from the US Department of Education through South Dakota’s EveryTeacher Teacher Quality Enhancement grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Timber Products Procurement During World War II, 1941-1945
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1951 Problems of timber products procurement during World War II, 1941-1945 Ben Meyer Huey The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Huey, Ben Meyer, "Problems of timber products procurement during World War II, 1941-1945" (1951). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3314. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3314 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CfilllEIISIAL PROBLEMS OP TIMBER PRODUCTS PROCUREMENT OTRINQ WORLD WAR II» 1941-1945 by Ben K. Mm»¥ B.S. ^Colorado A. aria I-C College, 3.94-2 A Report Prepared for the U.S. Department of Defense, Army, Corp® of Engineers by the U.So Department of Agricultures Forest Service Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Seieae®. Montana Stat® University 1951 Chairman of Bo*rd of Examiners Dean, Graduate School UMI Number: EP33843 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.35 – Origins of World War II EQ: Could World War II Have Been Prevented? 35.1 – Coach Schroeder Reads Introduction 34
    Ch.35 – Origins of World War II EQ: Could World War II have been prevented? 35.1 – Coach Schroeder reads introduction 34. 2 – Write down all 3 problems and choose 1 solution per problem to copy. (I’m writing all 3, personally) 35.3-8 – Paste your pictures in your notebook like it described on the handout. Then write the opportunities and hardships. Section 2 – On the Front Side of a sheet of paper. Fill in the boxes you create on a page in your IAN. Copy the PROBLEM. (YOU ONLY HAVE TO COPY ONE bullet per problem, but I’m WRITING ALL BULLETS, SO I GET SMARTER!) Problem: The economy needed to be converted from consumer production to military production. • The government created a new agency (the War Production Board) to manage the conversion and to mobilize businesses behind the war effort. • Various industries switched from producing consumer goods to producing military weapons and machinery. • The National War Labor Board settled labor disputes before they disrupted the production of war goods. Problem: The government needed large amounts of money to fight the war. • The Revenue Act of 1942 increased individual and corporate income tax rates and more than tripled the number of individuals required to pay income tax. • To make tax collection easier, Congress devised a system of withholding a certain amount from every paycheck and sending it directly to the government. • The government borrowed money from banks and other financial institutions. • The government issued war savings bonds to raise cash from the American people. Problem: Inflation and overconsumption threatened the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Collection Xii. World War Ii Papers, 1939 – 1947 Viii
    MILITARY COLLECTION XII. WORLD WAR II PAPERS, 1939 – 1947 VIII. OFFICE OF CIVILIAN DEFENSE Box No. Contents [1-27 Director’s Office, Correspondence Subject Files, 1941-1945, n.d. Files of the three directors of the Office of Civilian Defense: Theodore S. Johnson, 1941-1942; Ben E. Douglas, 1942 (previously an assistant director under Johnson); and Robert L. McMillan, 1943-1945. Also includes correspondence files of John W. Harrelson, chairman, North Carolina State Council of National Defense, 1941; and the correspondence files of the several assistant directors and field representatives. 1 Agreements with other agencies Agriculture, U.S. Department of Air markings [maps of New Hanover and Stanly counties removed and filed as MilColl.WWII.Maps.98-99] Air raid wardens Aircraft warning service Aluminum [see also weight receipts] American Committee for Defense of British Homes American Legion [see also Bryce P. Beard] American Red Cross [map removed and filed as MilColl.WWII.Maps.103] American War Dads American War Mothers 2 Applications for employment Applications for employment – correspondence Army liaison officers Army liaison officers – Chambliss’s territory Army liaison officers – Snow’s territory Automobiles Auxiliary firemen Bane, Frank P. [executive director, Council of State Governments] Beard, Bryce P. [American Legion] Belser, Irvine F. [director, regional office, Atlanta], July-September 1941 3 Belser, Irvine F., October 1941-June 1942 Blackouts for cars Boy Scouts of America MILITARY COLLECTION XII. WORLD WAR II PAPERS, 1939 – 1947 VIII. OFFICE OF CIVILIAN DEFENSE Box No. Contents 3 (cont.) Broughton, Governor J. Melville [includes booklet, For Vice President J. M. Broughton Governor of North Carolina] 4 Budget Bureau (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Guide
    CCCuuurrrrrriiicccuuullluuummm GGGuuuiiidddeee Franklin D. Roosevelt and WWII Vocabulary Allied Powers - The twenty-six nations fighting together against the Axis powers in WW II. The Allied powers were led by the US, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. America First Committee - A powerful isolationist group opposed to American involvement in WW II. It was disbanded following the Pearl Harbor attack. Anti-Comintern Pact - An agreement originally signed by Germany and Japan in November, 1936 and later signed by Italy in 1937 agreeing to cooperation against communism among the members Appeasement - A policy of preventing conflict by giving in to hostile nations’ demands. It is often used in referring to European concessions to Hitler in the 1930s, eg. at Munich in 1938. Arsenal of Democracy - A term referring to the United States’ ability to provide arms and materiel before and during WW II. Atlantic Charter - A document drafted in August, 1941 by FDR and Winston Churchill which contained basic principles of their hopes for a better world. It became the inspiration for the United Nations and was signed by twenty-six nations. Axis Powers - The nations fighting together against the Allies in WW II. The Axis consisted of Germany, Italy, Japan, and some of their satellites. Bataan Death March - A forced march that US prisoners of war endured following the fall of the Philippines to Japan. Battle of Britain - The defense of England against the Luftwaffe (Nazi air force) by the RAF (Royal Air Force) and anti-aircraft forces in 1940-41. Battle of Midway - A June, 1942 air/sea battle in the mid-Pacific during which the Japanese lost four aircraft carriers as well as numerous other fighting and transport ships.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii and the American Home Front
    DRAFT 2004 WORLD WAR II AND THE AMERICAN HOME FRONT National Historic Landmark Theme Study National Historic Landmarks Survey National Register, History, and Education National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission ____ Amended Submission =================================================================================== A. Name of Multiple Property Listing =================================================================================== WORLD WAR II AND THE AMERICAN HOME FRONT THEME STUDY =================================================================================== B. Associated Historic Contexts =================================================================================== (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) =================================================================================== C. Form Prepared by ===================================================================================
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Participants and Contemporaries: Papers
    World War II Participants and Contemporaries: Papers Container List ACCETTA, DOMINICK Residence: Fort Lee, New Jersey Service: 355th Inf Regt, Europe Volume: -1" Papers (1)(2) [record of Cannon Co., 355th Inf. Regt., 89th Inf. Div., Jan.-July 1945; Ohrdruf Concentration Camp; clippings; maps; booklet ”The Story of the 89th Infantry Division;” orders; song; ship’s newspaper, Jan. 1946;map with route of 89th Div.] AENCHBACHER, A.E. "Gene" Residence: Wichita, Kansas Service: Pilot, 97th Bomber Group, Europe; flew DDE from Gibraltar to North Africa, November 1942 Volume: -1" Papers [letters; clippings] ALFORD, MARTIN Residence: Abilene, Kansas Service: 5th Inf Div, Europe Volume: -1" Papers [copy of unit newspaper for 5th Inf. Div., May 8, 1945; program for memorial service; statistics on service and casualties in wars and conflicts] ALLMON, WILLIAM B. Residence: Jefferson City, Missouri Service: historian Volume: -1” 104 Inf Div (1) (2) [after action report for November 1944, describing activities of division in southwest Holland; this is a copy of the original report at the National Archives] 1 AMERICAN LEGION NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS Residence: Indianapolis, Indiana Service: Veteran's organization Volume: 13" After the War 1943-45 [a monthly bulletin published by the Institute on Postwar Reconstruction, Aug. 1943-April 1945] American Legion Publications (1)-(11) [civil defense; rights and benefits of veterans; home front; citizenship; universal draft; national defense and security program; Americanism; employment manual; Boy Scouts-youth program; G. I. Bill of Rights; peace and foreign relations; disaster; natural resources; law and order; UMT-universal military training; national defense; veterans’ employment; 1946 survey of veterans; reprint of two pages from The National Legionnaire, June 1940; instructors manual for military drill; United Nations; junior baseball program] Army-Navy YMCA Bulletin, 1942-44 Atlas of World Battle Fronts [1943-45] China at War, 1939 [four issues published by the China Information Publishing Co.] Clippings [submarine war; Alaska; U.S.
    [Show full text]