DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy for Space

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ENERGY FOR SPACE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S STRATEGY TO ADVANCE AMERICAN SPACE LEADERSHIP (FY 2021–FY 2031) Energy for Space: Department of Energy’s Strategy to Advance American Space Leadership Executive Summary The United States is facing an increasingly diverse and competitive environment in the commercial and Vision military exploitation of space. A growing number of The Department of Energy will be an essential nations are seeking to venture into space, and our source of the science, technology, and adversaries are energetically pursuing commercial and engineering solutions needed for advancing U.S. military advantage in this domain. The current National Space Strategy, National Space Policy, and Space leadership in the space domain. Policy Directives (SPDs) call for a reinvigorated, whole- of-nation approach to advance America’s leadership Strategic Goals in space-based science, technology, commerce, and security. U.S. priorities include returning American DOE will apply the Department’s core competencies astronauts to the Moon for the long-term, followed and emerging capabilities, including those of its 17 by human exploration missions to Mars and beyond; National Laboratories, to the needs of the U.S. space ensuring an unfettered ability to operate in space by community through focused strategic goals: deterring, countering, and defeating space-oriented threats to U.S. security; and reforming regulatory • Power the Exploration of Space. DOE will develop frameworks and pursuing international cooperation to space-capable energy technologies (both nuclear foster growth in space commerce. America’s leadership and non-nuclear) for U.S. space customers, explore in space will depend upon developing advanced, space- energy management systems for their potential applicable technology, through our own U.S. efforts application to space missions, and advance innovative and in partnership with nations and international space energy generation, collection, storage, distribution, agencies that share our values and interests. employment, dissipation, and thermal management technologies for space systems. Since the earliest days of space exploration, the • Solve the Mysteries of Space. DOE will harness Department of Energy (DOE) and its National the capabilities and expertise within its laboratory Laboratories have been essential suppliers of the complex and across its broad community of scientific research, knowledge, and technologies that researchers to make scientific discoveries for have led to a sustained U.S. presence in space, to ever- space and in space, advancing our fundamental longer space exploration missions, and to significant understanding of the universe and the ways in space achievements. The DOE innovation enterprise which humans can live and work in it safely, securely, brings together a world-class community of scientists, productively, and profitably. engineers, and technologists with unique, cutting-edge research facilities, capable of solving U.S. space mission • Support the Secure and Peaceful Use of Space. challenges and advancing U.S. scientific understanding DOE, including the National Nuclear Security of the universe. Administration (NNSA), will provide technical capabilities, systems, multi-purpose sensors, and Through this Energy for Space strategy, DOE will satellite development/deployment support with build on its support to U.S national space policies application to national security as well as civil space and programs, and contribute to advancing U.S. programs. leadership in space exploration, security, and • Enable the Development of Space. DOE will drive commerce via a more strategic approach to DOE’s innovation in space science research and achieve work with the space community. This strategy also breakthroughs in space-applicable technology for demonstrates the connections between DOE’s space- future U.S. space missions and grow U.S. space related contributions and DOE’s pursuit of its own commerce. core missions in science, energy, security, and the environment. i Energy for Space: Department of Energy’s Strategy to Advance American Space Leadership Principles Implementation DOE’s approach to these four strategic goals will be The Energy for Space strategy was prepared through underpinned by three foundational principles: the internal DOE Space Coordinating Group and in consultation with external U.S. space leaders, • DOE’s space-related activities will concurrently stakeholders, and partners, including the National develop DOE’s scientific and technically skilled Space Council, National Security Council, National workforce within DOE’s primary mission areas; create Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the opportunities to maintain and retain DOE’s cadre of Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. Space Force, experienced scientists, engineers, and technicians; and others. The implementation of this strategy will and promote educational achievement in Science, take place through a series of programmatic objectives Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and lines of action that DOE will pursue to support the programs aimed at building DOE’s next generation requirements and needs of other U.S. space agencies workforce. and industry, consistent with DOE’s strategic goals and • DOE’s scientific facilities and infrastructure will principles. The anticipated supporting program actions benefit from the additional work provided by other are outlined in the appendices to this document. agencies sponsoring space research, experiments, and technology development across the DOE enterprise. • DOE’s flexible Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) contracting model, as well as strategic partnering with other Federal agencies, industry, and universities, will both support U.S. space initiatives as well as offer practical opportunities for DOE to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of contract administration and project management performance at the best value to the U.S. taxpayer. ii Energy for Space: Department of Energy’s Strategy to Advance American Space Leadership Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................i The U.S. Strategy for Space Leadership ........................................... 1 The DOE Strategy for Space .............................................................. 3 Methodology ....................................................................................... 5 Goals and Objectives ..........................................................................7 Power the Exploration of Space ........................................................... 7 Solve the Mysteries of Space .............................................................10 Support the Secure and Peaceful Use of Space ............................. 12 Enable the Development of Space .................................................... 15 Conclusion .........................................................................................18 Appendix A: List of Legislation, Policy Directives, and Other Documents ................................................... 19 Appendix B: DOE Space Power Action Plan .................................... 21 Appendix C: DOE Space Science Action Plan ................................ 23 Appendix D: DOE Space National Security Action Plan ................ 26 Appendix E: DOE Space Development Action Plan ....................... 28 iii Energy for Space: Department of Energy’s Strategy to Advance American Space Leadership Acronyms and Abbreviations AI Artificial Intelligence LIBS Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy BNL Brookhaven National Laboratory LPS Lab Partnering Service CRADA Cooperative Research and Development MI Machine Intelligence Agreements MMRTG Multi-Mission Radioisotope CSP Concentrating Solar Power Thermoelectric Generator DAMIEN Detecting and Mitigating the Impact of MOU Memorandum of Understanding Earth-Bound Near-Earth Objects M&S Modeling and Simulation DART Double Asteroid Redirection Test NASA National Aeronautics and Space DC Direct Current Administration DoD Department of Defense NEO Near-Earth Object DOE Department of Energy NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration DOE NE Department of Energy Office of Nuclear NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Energy Administration DOE OE Department of Energy Office of Electricity NSF National Science Foundation FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency NTP Nuclear Thermal Propulsion FFRDC Federally Funded Research and ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory Development Center DOE OSPP Department of Energy Office of Strategic GPS Global Positioning Satellites Planning and Policy INL Idaho National Laboratory Pu Plutonium ISS International Space Station RFI Request for Information KRUSTY Kilowatt Power Using Stirling Technology RTG Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator LANL Los Alamos National Laboratory R&D Research and Development LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SHERLOC Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman & Luminescence for Organics and LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chemicals LTBT Limited Test Ban Treaty SNL Sandia National Laboratories iv Energy for Space: Department of Energy’s Strategy to Advance American Space Leadership SNPP Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion TRISO Tristructural-Isotropic (Nuclear Fuel) SPD Space Policy Directive USAF U.S. Air Force SPP Strategic Partnership Projects USNDS U.S. Nuclear Detonation Detection System SSA Space Situational Awareness STEM Science, Technology, Engineering
Recommended publications
  • A US Strategy for Sustainable Energy Security

    A US Strategy for Sustainable Energy Security

    A US Strategy for Sustainable Energy Security David Koranyi Foreword by Chuck Hagel A US Strategy for Sustainable Energy Security Atlantic Council Strategy Paper No. 2 © 2016 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-953-2 Cover art credit: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Mill of Montmartre by Georges Michel, ca. 1820. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council, its partners, and funders do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s particular conclusions. March 2016 Atlantic Council Strategy Papers Editorial Board Executive Editors Mr. Frederick Kempe Dr. Alexander V. Mirtchev Editor-in-Chief Mr. Barry Pavel Managing Editor Dr. Daniel Chiu Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................i Executive Summary ...................................................iii Introduction .................................................................1 The Need for a US Sustainable Energy Strategy .................. 2 Ten Key Trends Affecting US Energy Security ...................... 3 A US Strategy for Sustainable Energy Security........ 17 Pillar 1. Accelerate the Energy Sector Transition and Solidify the American Innovative Advantage ..................... 22 Pillar 2. Lead on Global Climate Action and Sustain Robust Energy Diplomacy Capabilities ................. 26 Pillar 3. Promote a Liberalized and Rules-based Global Energy Trade System and Build a Functioning Global Energy and Climate Governance Network .............
  • Energy Technology Perspectives 2020

    Energy Technology Perspectives 2020

    Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 A path for the decarbonisation of the buildings sector 14 December 2020 Page 1 Opening remarks Timur Gül Head, Energy Technology Policy Division, International Energy Agency (IEA) The IEA buildings technology work across four main deliverables Energy Technology Tracking clean energy Special Report on Clean Technology guide progress Perspectives Innovation Tracking Clean Energy Progress Assessing critical energy technologies for global clean energy transitions The IEA is unfolding a series of resources setting an ambitious pathway to reach the Paris Agreement and other Sustainable Development goals. Opening remarks Roland Hunziker Director, Sustainable Buildings and Cities, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 presentation Thibaut ABERGEL Chiara DELMASTRO Co-leads, Buildings Energy Technology, Energy Technology Policy Division, International Energy Agency (IEA) Commitment to net-zero emissions is globalising Share of energy-related CO2 emissions covered by national and supra-national public net-zero emissions targets as of 01st SeptemberDecember 20202020 Carbon or climate 100% 10 neutrality target 80% 8 No target 2 60% 6 Under discussion GtCO 40% 4 In policy document 20% 2 Proposed legislation 0% 0 In law Total emissions (right axis) Countries responsible for around 60% of global energy-related CO2 emissions have formulated net-zero emissions ambitions in laws, legislation, policy documents or official discussions. Source: IEA (2020),| Credit Energyphoto
  • Fuel Cells and Environmental, Energy, and Other Clean Energy Technologies…

    Fuel Cells and Environmental, Energy, and Other Clean Energy Technologies…

    Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Program Nancy L. Garland, Ph.D. Technology Development Manager Fuel Cell Technologies Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy United States Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 18th WWorldo rld Hydrogen EnergyEnergy Conference 2010 Essen, Germany May 17, 2010 Advancing Presidential Priorities Energy efficiency and renewable energy research , development , and deployment activities help the U.S. meet its economic, energy security, and environmental challenges concurrently. Energy Security Economic • Deploy the cheapest, cleanest, • Create green jobs through fastest energy source – energy Recovery Act energy projects efficiency • Double renewable energy • One million plug-in hybrid cars generation by 2012 on the road by 2015 Presidential Priorities • Weatherize one million homes • Develop the next generation of annually sustainable biofuels and infrastructure • Increase fuel economy standards Environmental • Implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050 • Make the US a leader on climate change • Establish a national low carbon fuel standard U.S. DOE President’s National Objectives for DOE— Energy to Secure America’s Future • Quickly Implement the Economic Recovery Package: Create Millions of New Green Jobs and Lay the Foundation for the Future • Restore Science Leadership: Strengthen America ’s Role as the World Leader in Science and Technology • Reduce GHG Emissions: Drive emissions 20 Percent below 1990 levels by 2020 • Enhance Energy Security: Save More Oil than the U.S currently imports from the Middle East and Venezuela combined within 10 years • Enhance Nuclear Security: Strengthen non-proliferation activities, reduce global stockpiles of nuclear weapons, and maintain safety and reliability of the US stockpile First Principle: Pursue material and cost-effective measures with a sense of urgency From: Secretary Chu’s presentation on DOE Goal’s and Targets, 5/5/09 U.S.
  • Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security

    Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security

    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE CONTRIBUTION OF RENEWABLES TO ENERGY SECURITY IEA INFORMATION PAPER S AMANTHA ÖLZ, R ALPH SIMS AND N ICOLAI KIRCHNER I NTERNATIONAL E NERGY A GENCY © OECD/IEA, April 2007 Table of contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................... 3 Foreword .............................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................. 7 1. Risks to energy security ............................................................................................... 13 1.1 Risks for developing countries............................................................................. 15 1.2 Policy responses to energy security risks ............................................................ 15 1.3 Energy security implications of renewable energy technologies........................... 16 2. Current energy use by market segment........................................................................ 19 2.1. Electricity production ........................................................................................... 19 2.2. Heat .................................................................................................................... 21 2.3. Transport............................................................................................................
  • Drivers of Innovation in Energy and Fuel Cell Technology: Supply-Demand and R&D

    Drivers of Innovation in Energy and Fuel Cell Technology: Supply-Demand and R&D

    Drivers of Innovation in Energy and Fuel Cell Technology: Supply-Demand and R&D Madeline Woodruff IEA and Yukiko Fukasaku OECD 1 Overview Q Drivers of energy technology innovation – Sustained increase in demand – Diversification of sources of fossil fuel supply due to growing security and economic concerns – Fuel switching and development of new fuels due to efficiency and environmental concerns – De-regulation and increasing competition Q Increasing importance of R&D and technological innovation Q How the energy innovation system works Q Focus on fuel cells 2 Part I Supply, Demand, and Investment Trends Role of Fuel Cells in the Energy System 3 4 Today’s Energy Reference Word Primary Energy Demand Challenges 6,000 WEO 2002 Oil Q Energy security to fuel economic 5,000 growth and mobility Gas 4,000 and Coal 3,000 curbing environmental and climate Nuclear damage from energy use 2,000 Hydro 1,000 Other – “business as usual” energy renewables demand is rising inexorably 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 – greenhouse gas emissions also – stronger policies stabilize OECD emissions only after 2020. Reference Energy-Related CO2 Emissions WEO 2002 Q Access to modern energy for all – 1.6 billion people have no access 45000 to electricity, 80% of them in 40000 World South Asia and sub-Saharan 35000 30000 OECD Africa 25000 Transition 20000 Q Lower costs in deregulated Economies 15000 markets; infrastructure stresses Developing 10000 Million Tonnes CO2 Tonnes Million Countries 5000 0 1971 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 5 Renewables Growing Fast, but From
  • Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition

    Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition

    Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition Ryan Wiser1, Mark Bolinger1, Ben Hoen, Dev Millstein, Joe Rand, Galen Barbose, Naïm Darghouth, Will Gorman, Seongeun Jeong, Andrew Mills, Ben Paulos Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Corresponding authors August 2020 This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Photo source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory ENERGY T ECHNOLOGIES AREA ENERGY ANALYSISAND ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACTS DIVISION ELECTRICITY M ARKETS & POLICY Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California.
  • Energy Technology Innovation Leadership in the 21St Century

    Energy Technology Innovation Leadership in the 21St Century

    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEADERSHIP IN THE 21ST CENTURY Hal Harvey, Jeffrey Rissman, and Sonia Aggarwal Technicians work on a 3-megawatt Alstom wind turbine and a 1.5-megawatt GE wind turbine at the National Wind Technology Center, the nation's premier wind energy technology research facility. www.energyinnovation.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A rich array of new energy options is a critical foundation for enduring prosperity, energy security, and the protection of the environment and public health. Smart policy can fill the pipeline with many energy technology options, bring the best of these options to market, and unleash the full power of the private sector in driving down their prices. Energy is profoundly a technology business, so it pays to understand which policies work best at stimulating energy technology innovation. This paper unpacks innovation—from risky science, with only distant potential for application, to the intense work of commercialization, wherein companies drive down costs, increase performance, and learn to deliver reliable products. To understand the set of needed policies, this paper divides innovation into three stages: research, engineering, and commercialization. It then examines which tools and practices work best for each stage. Research is by definition a risky business, and some projects will inevitably fail. However, well- managed research can deliver a far higher fraction of success than a piecemeal approach. For the research stage, four principals rise to the top: 1. Concentrate resources in innovation hubs; 2. Use peer review to select promising research domains that support explicit policy goals; 3. Ensure that policies intended to incentivize R&D are stable and predictable over the long time horizons (~10 years) necessary for R&D investment and technology development; 4.
  • Energy Security and the Energy Transition: a Classic Framework for a New Challenge

    Energy Security and the Energy Transition: a Classic Framework for a New Challenge

    REPORT 11.25.19 Energy Security and the Energy Transition: A Classic Framework for a New Challenge Mark Finley, Fellow in Energy and Global Oil their political leaders during the oil shocks of SUMMARY the 1970s. While these considerations have Policymakers in the US and around the world historically been motivated by consumers are grappling with how to understand the worried about access to uninterrupted security implications of an energy system supplies of oil, producing countries can in transition—and if they aren’t, they equally raise concerns about shocks to— should be. Recent attacks on Saudi facilities and the security of—demand. show that oil supply remains vulnerable In addition to geopolitical risk, the to disruption. New energy forms can help reliability of energy supplies has recently reduce vulnerability to oil supply outages, been threatened by factors ranging from but they also have the potential to introduce weather events (the frequency and intensity new vulnerabilities and risks. The US and its of which are exacerbated by climate allies have spent the past 50 years building a change) to terrorist activities, industrial robust domestic and international response accidents, and cyberattacks. The recent system to mitigate risks to oil supplies, but attack on Saudi oil facilities and resulting disruption of oil supplies,1 hurricanes on similar arrangements for other energy forms Policymakers are remain limited. This paper offers a framework the Gulf Coast (which disrupted oil and gas for assessing energy security based on an production and distribution, as well as the grappling with the evaluation of vulnerability, risk, and offsets; electrical grid), and high winds in California security implications this approach has been a useful tool for that caused widespread power outages of an energy system in assessing oil security for the past 50 years, have brought energy security once again transition—and if they into the global headlines.
  • Modeling Regulation of Economic Sustainability in Energy Systems with Diversified Resources

    Modeling Regulation of Economic Sustainability in Energy Systems with Diversified Resources

    Article Modeling Regulation of Economic Sustainability in Energy Systems with Diversified Resources Anatoly Alabugin and Sergei Aliukov * Higher School of Economics and Management, South Ural State University, Prospekt Lenina, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The imperfection of theoretical and methodological approaches to regulate the jump process transition when combining differentiated energy resources is a pressing issue. The goal of this paper is to develop a theory and a method to regulate the integration-balancing processes of combining diversified resources. The concept of combining integration and balancing models has been substantiated by methods of transforming multidimensional space and approximating generalized functions that represent jump-like processes. Theoretical and operational-regulatory models of economic sustainability have been developed, substantiating new concepts, patterns, prop- erties, dependencies and indicators of the dynamics of the processes of combination; the optimality conditions for the number of approximations of generalized functions, interpreting the effects of control functions of combining resources, are thus determined. New methods for solving problems have been developed: the organization of the energy technology complex of facilities for enhanced resource diversification and the Sustainable Development Center, improving the quality of managing dynamic processes in terms of combining and diversifying resources. Emphasis is placed on four
  • Energy Security Assessment Framework to Support Energy Policy Decisions

    Energy Security Assessment Framework to Support Energy Policy Decisions

    Energy security assessment framework to support energy policy decisions Juozas Augutis, Ričardas Krikštolaitis, Linas Martišauskas Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania EU Conference on modelling for policy support Brussels (Belgium), 26-27 November 2019 Presentation outline • Energy security definition • Methodology framework • Results of Lithuanian energy system 2 Energy security definition Energy Security Energy system Energy supply Energy price resilience to reliability acceptability disruptions Energy security* – the ability of the energy system: • to uninterruptedly supply energy to consumers under acceptable prices, • to resist potential disruptions arising due to technical, natural, economic, socio- political and geopolitical threats. *Vytautas Magnus University and Lithuanian Energy Institute, Energy Security Research Centre, 2013–2019 3 Methodology framework for the energy security analysis Threats • Identification and analysis of threats to energy security Disruptions • Formation of internal and external disruptions to energy system Energy system modelling • Model for energy system development implemented in OSeMOSYS tool • Energy system modelling with stochastic disruption scenarios or pathways Consequence analysis • Disruption consequences: energy cost increase and unsupplied energy Energy security metric Methodological approach • Energy security coefficient – quantitative level of energy security 4 Threats to energy security • A threat to energy security is defined as any potential danger that exists within or outside the energy system and that has a potential to result in some kind of disruption of that system. Category Threats • technical problems or accidents in the energy production, resource extractions and transportation, Technical energy transmission infrastructure and processing enterprises, • attacks on supply infrastructure. • extreme temperature, wind, rainfall and other extreme meteorological phenomena or natural Natural disasters.
  • New York City's Roadmap to 80 X 50

    New York City's Roadmap to 80 X 50

    New York City’s Roadmap to 80 to City’s Roadmap x 50 York New New York City’s Roadmap to nyc.gov/onenyc The City of New York #OneNYC Mayor Bill de Blasio @NYClimate Anthony Shorris Printed on 100% post-consumer recyled paper First Deputy Mayor New York City’s Roadmap to 80 x 50 is published pursuant to Local Law 66 of 2014. This report was produced by the New York City Mayor’s Office of Sustainability. This document was designed by Elisa Chaudet Cover Photo: Michael Appleton, Mayor’s Photography Office 80 x 50 Table of Contents Letter from the Mayor 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 15 Methodology 23 Energy 35 Buildings 55 Transportation 79 Waste 99 Actions New Yorkers Can Do 110 Next Steps 113 Glossary 117 Directory of Abbreviations 127 End Notes 129 nyc.gov/onenyc 80 x 50 1 80 x 50 Letter from the Mayor 2 80 x 50 nyc.gov/onenyc 80 x 50 Friends, Two years ago, I joined 400,000 others as we marched for action on climate change and committed that New York City would continue to lead by reducing greenhouse gases 80 percent by 2050, or 80 x 50. We detailed this commitment in our OneNYC report. Since that time, the nations of the world have come together to agree on a ground- breaking Paris Agreement, and just this month the world’s two biggest emitters, the US and China, committed to joining that agreement, putting it on a path toward ratification. Locally, we have continued to drive down our emissions, but we have much more to do.
  • Thermophotovoltaic Energy in Space Applications: Review and Future Potential A

    Thermophotovoltaic Energy in Space Applications: Review and Future Potential A

    Thermophotovoltaic energy in space applications: Review and future potential A. Datas , A. Marti ABSTRACT This article reviews the state of the art and historical development of thermophotovoltaic (TPV) energy conversion along with that of the main competing technologies, i.e. Stirling, Brayton, thermoelectrics, and thermionics, in the field of space power generation. Main advantages of TPV are the high efficiency, the absence of moving parts, and the fact that it directly generates DC power. The main drawbacks are the unproven reliability and the low rejection temperature, which makes necessary the use of relatively large radiators. This limits the usefulness of TPV to small/medium power applications (100 We-class) that includes radioisotope (RTPV) and small solar thermal (STPV) generators. In this article, next generation TPV concepts are also revisited in order to explore their potential in future space power applications. Among them, multiband TPV cells are found to be the most promising in the short term because of their higher conversion efficiencies at lower emitter temperatures; thus significantly reducing the amount of rejected heat and the required radiator mass. 1. Introduction into electricity. A few of them enable a direct conversion process (e.g. PV and fuel cells), but the majority require the intermediate generation A number of technological options exist for power generation in of heat, which is subsequently converted into electricity by a heat space, which are selected depending on the mission duration and the engine. Thus, many kinds of heat engines have been developed within electric power requirements. For very short missions, chemical energy the frame of international space power R&D programs.