DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Efficiency and Cost Savings Opportunities For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Efficiency and Cost Savings Opportunities For Energy Efficiency and Cost Saving Opportunities for Metal Casting An ENERGY STAR® Guide for Energy & Plant Managers January 2016 Document Number 430-R-16-001 Office of Air Programs—Climate Protection Partnership Division Energy Efficiency and Cost Saving Opportunities for Metal Casting An ENERGY STAR® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Katerina Kermeli, Utrecht University Richard Deuchler, Utrecht University Ernst Worrell, Utrecht University Eric Masanet, Northwestern University January 2016 Disclaimer This guide was prepared for the United States Government and is believed to contain correct information. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any persons or organizations involved in its development, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe on privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or any persons or organizations involved in its development. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Development of this guide was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The research embodied in this report was initially supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 and was completed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Contract No. EP-BPA-12-H-0012. The cover photograph was provided by Grede LLC of its St. Cloud casting plant. The ENERGY STAR Metal Casting Guide Table of Contents Overview....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One: Why Energy Management is Good for Your Business ...................................................... 2 Chapter Two: Where to Look for Energy Savings ..................................................................................... 3 Energy Efficiency Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 5 Chapter Three: Energy Management Programs and Systems ................................................................ 8 Energy Savings Checklist: Energy Management .................................................................................. 8 Chapter Four: Motor Systems ................................................................................................................... 12 Chapter Five: Compressed Air Systems ................................................................................................... 18 Chapter Six: Fan Systems .......................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter Seven: Pump Systems ................................................................................................................. 30 Chapter Eight: Lighting .............................................................................................................................. 37 Chapter Nine: Building HVAC ................................................................................................................... 42 Chapter Ten: Dust Control ......................................................................................................................... 48 Chapter Eleven: Process Chain Level ...................................................................................................... 49 Chapter Twelve: Furnace Operation ........................................................................................................ 54 Chapter Thirteen: General Furnace Measures ........................................................................................ 58 Chapter Fourteen: Cupola Furnaces ......................................................................................................... 64 Chapter Fifteen: Electric Induction Furnaces .......................................................................................... 67 Chapter Sixteen: Electric Arc Furnaces ................................................................................................... 72 Chapter Seventeen: Crucible Furnaces ................................................................................................... 75 Chapter Eighteen: Reverberatory and Stack Furnaces .......................................................................... 77 Chapter Nineteen: Ladles .......................................................................................................................... 81 Chapter Twenty: Improve Casting Yield and Decrease Scrap Generation .......................................... 84 Conclusion: Why Manage Energy? ........................................................................................................... 88 Appendix A: The Metal Casting Industry ................................................................................................ 90 Process Description .............................................................................................................................. 92 Appendix B: Energy Consumption by Foundry Type ................................................................................ 95 Energy Use in U.S Iron Foundries ........................................................................................................ 95 Energy Use in U.S. Steel Foundries ...................................................................................................... 96 Energy Use in U.S. Aluminum Foundries ............................................................................................. 98 Appendix C: Diagram of Process and Non-Process Energy Use in U.S. Foundries in 2006 ............... 100 Appendix D: Standards for NEMA Motors ............................................................................................. 101 The ENERGY STAR Metal Casting Guide Appendix E: Energy Management Program Assessment Matrix ......................................................... 102 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 102 How To Use The Assessment Matrix ................................................................................................. 102 Interpreting Your Results .................................................................................................................... 106 Resources and Help ............................................................................................................................ 106 Appendix F: Teaming Up to Save Energy Checklist ............................................................................... 107 Appendix G: Support Programs for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvement .................................. 109 Tools for Self-Assessment .................................................................................................................. 109 Assessment and Technical Assistance ............................................................................................. 111 Federal, State, Local, and Utility Incentives ..................................................................................... 112 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................... 113 References ............................................................................................................................................... 115 The ENERGY STAR Metal Casting Guide 1 Overview This Guide provides information to identify cost-effective practices and technologies to increase energy efficiency in each of three industrial metal casting segments: iron, steel and aluminum. It focuses on the most important systems, processes, and practices that account for the bulk of energy consumption. The information found in this Guide will help energy and plant managers identify energy reduction opportunities in their facility as well as improve the quality of metal casting operations. For additional information on metal casting and associated processes and their energy consumption, please consult Appendix A of this Guide. Energy costs typically account for 5-7% of the overall operating costs in a metal casting foundry. Energy waste is found in all plants, and improving energy efficiency goes right to the bottom line. Following the procedures outlined in this guide will reduce your energy costs (and dollars spent) per ton1 of cast metal while improving your environmental reputation as well as image in the community. This Guide is organized as follows: • Chapter One - the value of energy management in a metal casting facility, • Chapter Two – information on energy costs and energy efficiency opportunities in metal casting, • Chapters Three through Twenty-four - step-by-step best practices to save energy and reduce costs, and, • Appendices – explanation on how energy is used in the industry and in various processes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Consumption by Source and Sector, 2019 (Quadrillion Btu)
    U.S. energy consumption by source and sector, 2019 (Quadrillion Btu) Sourcea End-use sectorc Percent of sources Percent of sectors 70 91 Transportation Petroleum 24 3 28.2 36.7 3 5 2 <1 (37%) (37%) 1 34 40 9 Industrial 4 3 26.3 Natural gas 12 33 (35%) 32.1 16 11 (32%) 36 8 44 7 Residential 41 11.9 (16%) 12 9 22 39 Renewable energy 7 3 Commercial 11.5 (11%) 2 <1 9.4 (12%) 56 49 10 Total = 75.9 Coal <1 11.3 (11%) 90 Electric power sectorb Nuclear 100 8.5 (8%) Electricity retail sales 12.8 (35%) Total = 100.2 Electrical system energy losses 24.3 (65%) Total = 37.1 a Primary energy consumption. Each energy source is measured in different physical content of electricity retail sales. See Note 1, "Electrical System Energy Losses," at the end of units and converted to common British thermal units (Btu). See U.S. Energy Information EIA’s Monthly Energy Review, Section 2. Administration (EIA), Monthly Energy Review, Appendix A. Noncombustible renewable c End-use sector consumption of primary energy and electricity retail sales, excluding electrical energy sources are converted to Btu using the “Fossil Fuel Equivalency Approach”, see system energy losses from electricity retail sales. Industrial and commercial sectors EIA’s Monthly Energy Review, Appendix E. consumption includes primary energy consumption by combined-heat-and-power (CHP) and b The electric power sector includes electricity-only and combined-heat-and-power (CHP) electricity-only plants contained within the sector. plants whose primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA ENERGY FACT SHEET Energy Efficiency & Energy Consumption April 2016
    ARIZONA ENERGY FACT SHEET Energy Efficiency & Energy Consumption April 2016 An Overview of Energy Efficiency Quick Facts: Energy efficiency means reducing the amount of energy Population, 2014: 6,731,484 that you need to perform a particular task. When you Population growth rate, 2006-2014: 0.79% per year practice energy efficiency, you increase or maintain your Number of households, 2014: 2,387,246 level of service, but you decrease the energy used to Source: United States Census Bureau. provide that service through efficient technologies. Examples include ENERGY STAR appliances, compact fluorescent and LED light bulbs, better insulation for Primary Energy Consumption (2013) buildings, more efficient windows, high efficiency air Primary energy consumption: 1,415 trillion Btu conditioning equipment, and vehicles with higher miles Growth rate, 2006-2013: -0.57% per year per gallon (mpg). Another distinct strategy is energy con- servation, which means that you change your behavior or Primary energy consumption per capita: 213 million Btu lifestyle to reduce energy use. Examples include carpool- Ranking, energy consumption per capita: 43 ing, using mass transit, turning thermostats down in the Ranking, total energy consumption: 27 winter and up in summer, and other behavioral changes. Ratio of consumption to production: 2.38 Improving energy efficiency is a “win-win” strategy — Energy Expenditures (2013) it saves money for consumers and businesses, reduces the need for costly and controversial new power plants, Total energy expenditures: $ 22.8 billion increases the reliability of energy supply, cuts pollution Ranking, energy expenditures: 23 and greenhouse gas emissions, and lowers energy Energy expenditures per capita: $ 3,434 imports.
    [Show full text]
  • ITP Metal Casting: Advanced Melting Technologies
    Advanced Melting Technologies: Energy Saving Concepts and Opportunities for the Metal Casting Industry November 2005 BCS, Incorporated 5550 Sterrett Place, Suite 306 Columbia, MD 21044 www.bcs-hq.com Advanced Melting Technologies: Energy Saving Concepts and Opportunities for the Metal Casting Industry Prepared for ITP Metal Casting by BCS, Incorporated November 2005 Acknowledgments This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers from University of Missouri–Rolla, Case Western Reserve University, and Carnegie Mellon University with BCS, Incorporated as the project coordinator and lead. The research findings for the nonferrous casting industry were contributed by Dr. Jack Wallace and Dr. David Schwam, while the ferrous melting technologies were addressed by Dr. Kent Peaslee and Dr. Richard Fruehan. BCS, Incorporated researched independently to provide an overview of the melting process and the U.S. metal casting industry. The final report was prepared by Robert D. Naranjo, Ji-Yea Kwon, Rajita Majumdar, and William T. Choate of BCS, Incorporated. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of the U.S. Department of Energy and Cast Metal Coalition (CMC) in conducting this study. Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an Agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any Agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any Agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 12.9: Secondary Copper Smelting
    12.9SecondaryCopperSmelting 12.9.1General1,2 Asof1992,morethan40percentoftheU.S.supplyofcopperisderivedfromsecondary sources,includingsuchitemsasmachineshoppunchings,turnings,andborings;manufacturingfacility defectiveorsurplusgoods;automobileradiators,pipes,wires,bushings,andbearings;and metallurgicalprocessskimmingsanddross.Thissecondarycoppercanberefinedintorelativelypure metalliccopper,alloyedwithzincortintoformbrassorbronze,incorporatedintochemicalproducts, orusedinanumberofsmallerapplications.Sixsecondarycoppersmeltersareinoperationinthe U.S.:3inIllinoisand1eachinGeorgia,Pennsylvania,andSouthCarolina.Alargenumberofmills andfoundriesreclaimrelativelypurecopperscrapforalloyingpurposes. 12.9.2ProcessDescription2,3 Secondarycopperrecoveryisdividedinto4separateoperations:scrappretreatment,smelting, alloying,andcasting.Pretreatmentincludesthecleaningandconsolidationofscrapinpreparationfor smelting.Smeltingconsistsofheatingandtreatingthescrapforseparationandpurificationofspecific metals.Alloyinginvolvestheadditionof1ormoreothermetalstocoppertoobtaindesirable qualitiescharacteristicofthecombinationofmetals.Themajorsecondarycoppersmeltingoperations areshowninFigure12.9-1;brassandbronzealloyingoperationsareshowninFigure12.9-2. 12.9.2.1Pretreatment- Scrappretreatmentmaybeachievedthroughmanual,mechanical,pyrometallurgical,or hydrometallurgicalmethods.Manualandmechanicalmethodsincludesorting,stripping,shredding, andmagneticseparation.Thescrapmaythenbecompressedintobricquettesinahydraulicpress. Pyrometallurgicalpretreatmentmayincludesweating(theseparationofdifferentmetalsbyslowly
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property
    NFS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multipler Propertyr ' Documentation Form NATIONAL This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ____Iron and Steel Resources of Pennsylvania, 1716-1945_______________ B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________ ~ ___Pennsylvania Iron and Steel Industry. 1716-1945_________________ C. Geographical Data Commonwealth of Pennsylvania continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, J hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requiremerytS\set forth iri36JCFR PafrfsBOfcyid the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature of certifying official Date / Brent D. Glass Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into the Energy Consumption of a Data Center with a Thermosyphon Heat Exchanger
    Article Mechanical Engineering July 2011 Vol.56 No.20: 21852190 doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4500-5 SPECIAL TOPICS: Investigation into the energy consumption of a data center with a thermosyphon heat exchanger ZHOU Feng, TIAN Xin & MA GuoYuan* College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China Received October 18, 2010; accepted February 17, 2011 A data center test model was used to analyze the energy dissipation characteristics and energy consumption of a data center. The results indicate that adequate heat dissipation from a data center cannot be achieved only from heat dissipation through the build- ing envelope during Beijing winter conditions. This is because heat dissipation through the building envelope covers about 19.5% of the total data center heat load. The average energy consumption for an air conditioner is 4 to 5 kW over a 24-h period. The temperature difference between the indoor and outdoor air for the data center with a thermosyphon heat exchanger is less than 20°C. The energy consumption of the thermosyphon heat exchanger is only 41% of that of an air conditioner. The annual energy consumption can be reduced by 35.4% with a thermosyphon system. In addition, the effect of the outdoor temperature on the en- ergy consumption of an air conditioner is greater than the indoor room temperature. The energy consumption of an air conditioner system increases by 5% to 6% for every 1°C rise in the outdoor temperature. data center, energy consumption, thermosyphon heat exchanger, ambient energy Citation: Zhou F, Tian X, Ma G Y.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 12.8: Secondary Aluminum Operations
    12.8SecondaryAluminumOperations 12.8.1General1 Secondaryaluminumproducersrecyclealuminumfromaluminum-containingscrap,while primaryaluminumproducersconvertbauxiteoreintoaluminum.Thesecondaryaluminumindustry wasresponsiblefor27.5percentofdomesticaluminumproducedin1989.Thereareapproximately 116plantswitharecoverycapacityofapproximately2.4millionmegagrams(2.6milliontons)of aluminumperyear.Actualtotalsecondaryaluminumproductionwasrelativelyconstantduringthe 1980s.However,increaseddemandforaluminumbytheautomobileindustryhasdoubledinthelast 10yearstoanaverageof78.5kilograms(173pounds)percar.Recyclingofusedaluminumbeverage cans(UBC)increasedmorethan26percentfrom1986to1989.In1989,1.3millionmegagrams(1.4 milliontons)ofUBCswererecycled,representingover60percentofcansshipped.Recyclingaton ofaluminumrequiresonly5percentoftheenergyrequiredtorefineatonofprimaryaluminumfrom bauxiteore,makingthesecondaryaluminumeconomicallyviable. 12.8.2ProcessDescription Secondaryaluminumproductioninvolves2generalcategoriesofoperations,scrappretreatment andsmelting/refining.Pretreatmentoperationsincludesorting,processing,andcleaningscrap. Smelting/refiningoperationsincludecleaning,melting,refining,alloying,andpouringofaluminum recoveredfromscrap.Theprocessesusedtoconvertscrapaluminumtoproductssuchaslightweight aluminumalloysforindustrialcastingsarepresentedinFigure12.8-1Aand Figure12.8-1B.Someorallthestepsinthesefiguresmaybeinvolvedatanyonefacility.Some stepsmaybecombinedorreordered,dependingonscrapquality,sourceofscrap,auxiliaryequipment available,furnacedesign,andproductspecifications.Plantconfiguration,scraptypeusage,and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Energy Challenges September 2015 1 Energy Challenges
    QUADRENNIAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW AN ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES Chapter 1: Energy Challenges September 2015 1 Energy Challenges Energy is the Engine of the U.S. Economy Quadrennial Technology Review 1 1 Energy Challenges 1.1 Introduction The United States’ energy system, vast in size and increasingly complex, is the engine of the economy. The national energy enterprise has served us well, driving unprecedented economic growth and prosperity and supporting our national security. The U.S. energy system is entering a period of unprecedented change; new technologies, new requirements, and new vulnerabilities are transforming the system. The challenge is to transition to energy systems and technologies that simultaneously address the nation’s most fundamental needs—energy security, economic competitiveness, and environmental responsibility—while providing better energy services. Emerging advanced energy technologies can do much to address these challenges, but further improvements in cost and performance are important.1 Carefully targeted research, development, demonstration, and deployment (RDD&D) are essential to achieving these improvements and enabling us to meet our nation’s energy objectives. This report, the 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review (QTR 2015), examines science and technology RDD&D opportunities across the entire U.S. energy system. It focuses primarily on technologies with commercialization potential in the mid-term and beyond. It frames various tradeoffs that all energy technologies must balance, across such dimensions as diversity and security of supply, cost, environmental impacts, reliability, land use, and materials use. Finally, it provides data and analysis on RDD&D pathways to assist decision makers as they set priorities, subject to budget constraints, to develop more secure, affordable, and sustainable energy services.
    [Show full text]
  • Router Energy Per Bit Router Energy Efficiency 10000
    Energy Considerations in Data Transmission and Switching Rod Tucker Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering University of Melbourne Summary • Big‐picture view of data and energy in network & DCs • Snapshot of 2017 and projections for 2021 • Key energy bottlenecks – Access networks – Servers in data centers – Data storage – Switches and routers – Global optical transmission • Gap between technology limits and reality The Internet Storage Servers Switches Router Routers etc Global Data Core Network Base Center Station Switch Data Center Data Networks Center Metro/Edge Access Network Network Data Center Content Distribution OLT ONU Data Networks Router Center This talk Fiber Optical TX/RX Router Data usage in 2017 ‐ 1.5 Zettabytes >15 ? 12 Zettabytes/year 200 Tb/s 3200 Tb/s 800 Tb/s (40 %) 1.5x1021 bytes/year* Global 500 Tb/s (avg.) Data Core Network 135 kb/s (avg.) Center Data Center Data Networks Center Metro/Edge Access Network Network Data Center 300 Tb/s Content Distribution 3.7 billion users Data Networks (50 % of world pop.) Center 300 Tb/s (60 %) Sources: Cisco, VNI*, 2016‐2021, (2017); Google; Facebook; Akamai 2021 ‐ Twice as much data as 2017 > 40 ? 25 Zettabytes/year 300 Tb/s 6.4 Pb/s 1.6 Pb/s (30 %) 3.3x1021 bytes/year* Global 1Pb/s (avg.) Data Core Network 220 kb/s (avg.) Center Data Center Data Networks Center Metro/Edge Access Network Network Data Center 600 Tb/s Content Distribution 4.5 billion users Data Networks (60 % of world pop.) Center 700 Tb/s (70 %) Sources: Cisco, VNI*, 2016‐2021, (2017); Google; Facebook; Akamai Data, energy and efficiency Data (~ 25 % p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of High-Temperature Treatment of Melt on the Composition and Structure of Aluminum Alloy
    ARCHIVES of ISSN (2299-2944) FOUNDRY ENGINEERING Volume 17 DOI: 10.1515/afe-2017-0131 Issue 4/2017 Published quarterly as the organ of the Foundry Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences 61 – 66 Influence of High-Temperature Treatment of Melt on the Composition and Structure of Aluminum Alloy V.A. Grachev a, *, N.D. Turakhodjaev b a A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Bldg 1, Bolshaya Ordynka St., Suite # 104, 119017 Moscow, Russia b Tashkent State Technical University, Faculty of Mechanical University 2,Tashkent 100095, Republic of Uzbekistan, * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Received 12.04.2017; accepted in revised form 23.06.2017 Abstract The aim of the current study was to examine the structure of an alloy treated at various temperatures up to 2,000–2,100 °C. Among research techniques for studying alloy structure there were the electron and optical microstructure, X-ray structure, and spectral analysis, and for studying the developed furnace geometric parameters the authors employed mathematical modeling method. The research was performed using aluminum smelting gas-fired furnaces and electric arc furnaces. The objects of the study were aluminum alloys of the brand AK7p and AK6, as well as hydrogen and aluminum oxide in the melt. For determining the hydrogen content in the aluminum alloy, the vacuum extraction method was selected. Authors have established that treatment of molten aluminum alloy in contact with carbon melt at high temperatures of 2,000–2,100 °C has resulted in facilitating reduction of hydrogen and aluminum oxide content in the melt by 40- 43% and 50-58%, respectively, which is important because hydrogen and aluminum oxide adversely affect the structure and properties of the alloy.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Roadmap to 80 X 50
    New York City’s Roadmap to 80 to City’s Roadmap x 50 York New New York City’s Roadmap to nyc.gov/onenyc The City of New York #OneNYC Mayor Bill de Blasio @NYClimate Anthony Shorris Printed on 100% post-consumer recyled paper First Deputy Mayor New York City’s Roadmap to 80 x 50 is published pursuant to Local Law 66 of 2014. This report was produced by the New York City Mayor’s Office of Sustainability. This document was designed by Elisa Chaudet Cover Photo: Michael Appleton, Mayor’s Photography Office 80 x 50 Table of Contents Letter from the Mayor 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 15 Methodology 23 Energy 35 Buildings 55 Transportation 79 Waste 99 Actions New Yorkers Can Do 110 Next Steps 113 Glossary 117 Directory of Abbreviations 127 End Notes 129 nyc.gov/onenyc 80 x 50 1 80 x 50 Letter from the Mayor 2 80 x 50 nyc.gov/onenyc 80 x 50 Friends, Two years ago, I joined 400,000 others as we marched for action on climate change and committed that New York City would continue to lead by reducing greenhouse gases 80 percent by 2050, or 80 x 50. We detailed this commitment in our OneNYC report. Since that time, the nations of the world have come together to agree on a ground- breaking Paris Agreement, and just this month the world’s two biggest emitters, the US and China, committed to joining that agreement, putting it on a path toward ratification. Locally, we have continued to drive down our emissions, but we have much more to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Power Units and Conversions
    Energy and Power Units and Conversions Basic Energy Units 1 Joule (J) = Newton meter × 1 calorie (cal)= 4.18 J = energy required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1◦C 1 Btu = 1055 Joules = 778 ft-lb = 252 calories = energy required to raise the temperature 1 lb of water by 1◦F 1 ft-lb = 1.356 Joules = 0.33 calories 1 physiological calorie = 1000 cal = 1 kilocal = 1 Cal 1 quad = 1015Btu 1 megaJoule (MJ) = 106 Joules = 948 Btu, 1 gigaJoule (GJ) = 109 Joules = 948; 000 Btu 1 electron-Volt (eV) = 1:6 10 19 J × − 1 therm = 100,000 Btu Basic Power Units 1 Watt (W) = 1 Joule/s = 3:41 Btu/hr 1 kiloWatt (kW) = 103 Watt = 3:41 103 Btu/hr × 1 megaWatt (MW) = 106 Watt = 3:41 106 Btu/hr × 1 gigaWatt (GW) = 109 Watt = 3:41 109 Btu/hr × 1 horse-power (hp) = 2545 Btu/hr = 746 Watts Other Energy Units 1 horsepower-hour (hp-hr) = 2:68 106 Joules = 0.746 kwh × 1 watt-hour (Wh) = 3:6 103 sec 1 Joule/sec = 3:6 103 J = 3.413 Btu × × × 1 kilowatt-hour (kWh) = 3:6 106 Joules = 3413 Btu × 1 megaton of TNT = 4:2 1015 J × Energy and Power Values solar constant = 1400W=m2 1 barrel (bbl) crude oil (42 gals) = 5:8 106 Btu = 9:12 109 J × × 1 standard cubic foot natural gas = 1000 Btu 1 gal gasoline = 1:24 105 Btu × 1 Physics 313 OSU 3 April 2001 1 ton coal 3 106Btu ≈ × 1 ton 235U (fissioned) = 70 1012 Btu × 1 million bbl oil/day = 5:8 1012 Btu/day =2:1 1015Btu/yr = 2.1 quad/yr × × 1 million bbl oil/day = 80 million tons of coal/year = 1/5 ton of uranium oxide/year One million Btu approximately equals 90 pounds of coal 125 pounds of dry wood 8 gallons of
    [Show full text]