Energy and Power Units and Conversions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Energy and Power Units and Conversions Basic Energy Units 1 Joule (J) = Newton meter × 1 calorie (cal)= 4.18 J = energy required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1◦C 1 Btu = 1055 Joules = 778 ft-lb = 252 calories = energy required to raise the temperature 1 lb of water by 1◦F 1 ft-lb = 1.356 Joules = 0.33 calories 1 physiological calorie = 1000 cal = 1 kilocal = 1 Cal 1 quad = 1015Btu 1 megaJoule (MJ) = 106 Joules = 948 Btu, 1 gigaJoule (GJ) = 109 Joules = 948; 000 Btu 1 electron-Volt (eV) = 1:6 10 19 J × − 1 therm = 100,000 Btu Basic Power Units 1 Watt (W) = 1 Joule/s = 3:41 Btu/hr 1 kiloWatt (kW) = 103 Watt = 3:41 103 Btu/hr × 1 megaWatt (MW) = 106 Watt = 3:41 106 Btu/hr × 1 gigaWatt (GW) = 109 Watt = 3:41 109 Btu/hr × 1 horse-power (hp) = 2545 Btu/hr = 746 Watts Other Energy Units 1 horsepower-hour (hp-hr) = 2:68 106 Joules = 0.746 kwh × 1 watt-hour (Wh) = 3:6 103 sec 1 Joule/sec = 3:6 103 J = 3.413 Btu × × × 1 kilowatt-hour (kWh) = 3:6 106 Joules = 3413 Btu × 1 megaton of TNT = 4:2 1015 J × Energy and Power Values solar constant = 1400W=m2 1 barrel (bbl) crude oil (42 gals) = 5:8 106 Btu = 9:12 109 J × × 1 standard cubic foot natural gas = 1000 Btu 1 gal gasoline = 1:24 105 Btu × 1 Physics 313 OSU 3 April 2001 1 ton coal 3 106Btu ≈ × 1 ton 235U (ﬁssioned) = 70 1012 Btu × 1 million bbl oil/day = 5:8 1012 Btu/day =2:1 1015Btu/yr = 2.1 quad/yr × × 1 million bbl oil/day = 80 million tons of coal/year = 1/5 ton of uranium oxide/year One million Btu approximately equals 90 pounds of coal 125 pounds of dry wood 8 gallons of gasoline 10 therms of natural gas 1.1 day energy consumption per person in the US 100 kwh of electricity generated at a fossil fuel power plant Everyday usage and energy equivalencies 1 bbl oil = driving 840 miles in average car State of California energy needs for 8 hours = 1 million barrels of oil 1 gal gasoline = 11 kwh electricity (assuming 30 1 gal gasoline = 48 hours of color TV 1 gal gasoline = 5 hours of air conditioning 1 gal gasoline = average summer solar energy incident on 2 square meters Preﬁxes kilo = 103, mega = 106, giga= 109 3 6 9 milli= 10− , micro= 10− , nano= 10− 2 Physics 313 OSU 3 April 2001.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Locomotive Dedication Ceremony
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers REGIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING HERITAGE COLLECTION LOCOMOTIVE DEDICATION CEREMONY Kenefick Park • Omaha, Nebraska June 7, 1994 Locomotives 4023 and 6900 are examples of the world’s largest motive power in the steam and diesel eras. These locomotives are on permanent display at Kenefick Park, which was established in 1989 in honor of noted former Union Pacific chairman, John C. Kenefick. The 4023 was one of twenty-five famous “Big Boy” type simple articulated locomotives Locomotive 4023 was a feature display lauded in the industry and press as the highest horsepower, heaviest and longest steam at the Omaha Shops locomotives ever built, developing seven thousand horsepower at their seventy miles until being moved to per hour design speed. Kenefick Park. 2 World’s largest The Big Boy type was designed at the Omaha headquarters of Union Pacific under the single unit diesel personal direction of the road’s noted mechanical head, Otto Jabelmann. The original locomotives required four axle trucks to distribute twenty locomotives of this type were built by American Locomotive Company in their heavy weight and Schenectady, New York, in the fall of 1941. They were built in preparation for the nation’s keep within track probable entry into World War II because no proven diesel freight locomotive was yet loading limits. in production. These 4-8-8-4 type locomotives were specifically designed to haul fast, heavy eastbound freight trains between Ogden, Utah, and Green River, Wyoming, over the 1.14 percent eastbound grade. The 4023 was one of five additional units built in 1944 under govern- ment authority in preparation for a twenty-five percent increase in traffic due to the shift from European to Pacific war operations.
[Show full text]
Energy Consumption by Source and Sector, 2019 (Quadrillion Btu)
U.S. energy consumption by source and sector, 2019 (Quadrillion Btu) Sourcea End-use sectorc Percent of sources Percent of sectors 70 91 Transportation Petroleum 24 3 28.2 36.7 3 5 2 <1 (37%) (37%) 1 34 40 9 Industrial 4 3 26.3 Natural gas 12 33 (35%) 32.1 16 11 (32%) 36 8 44 7 Residential 41 11.9 (16%) 12 9 22 39 Renewable energy 7 3 Commercial 11.5 (11%) 2 <1 9.4 (12%) 56 49 10 Total = 75.9 Coal <1 11.3 (11%) 90 Electric power sectorb Nuclear 100 8.5 (8%) Electricity retail sales 12.8 (35%) Total = 100.2 Electrical system energy losses 24.3 (65%) Total = 37.1 a Primary energy consumption. Each energy source is measured in different physical content of electricity retail sales. See Note 1, "Electrical System Energy Losses," at the end of units and converted to common British thermal units (Btu). See U.S. Energy Information EIA’s Monthly Energy Review, Section 2. Administration (EIA), Monthly Energy Review, Appendix A. Noncombustible renewable c End-use sector consumption of primary energy and electricity retail sales, excluding electrical energy sources are converted to Btu using the “Fossil Fuel Equivalency Approach”, see system energy losses from electricity retail sales. Industrial and commercial sectors EIA’s Monthly Energy Review, Appendix E. consumption includes primary energy consumption by combined-heat-and-power (CHP) and b The electric power sector includes electricity-only and combined-heat-and-power (CHP) electricity-only plants contained within the sector. plants whose primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
[Show full text]
ARIZONA ENERGY FACT SHEET Energy Efficiency & Energy Consumption April 2016
ARIZONA ENERGY FACT SHEET Energy Efficiency & Energy Consumption April 2016 An Overview of Energy Efficiency Quick Facts: Energy efficiency means reducing the amount of energy Population, 2014: 6,731,484 that you need to perform a particular task. When you Population growth rate, 2006-2014: 0.79% per year practice energy efficiency, you increase or maintain your Number of households, 2014: 2,387,246 level of service, but you decrease the energy used to Source: United States Census Bureau. provide that service through efficient technologies. Examples include ENERGY STAR appliances, compact fluorescent and LED light bulbs, better insulation for Primary Energy Consumption (2013) buildings, more efficient windows, high efficiency air Primary energy consumption: 1,415 trillion Btu conditioning equipment, and vehicles with higher miles Growth rate, 2006-2013: -0.57% per year per gallon (mpg). Another distinct strategy is energy con- servation, which means that you change your behavior or Primary energy consumption per capita: 213 million Btu lifestyle to reduce energy use. Examples include carpool- Ranking, energy consumption per capita: 43 ing, using mass transit, turning thermostats down in the Ranking, total energy consumption: 27 winter and up in summer, and other behavioral changes. Ratio of consumption to production: 2.38 Improving energy efficiency is a “win-win” strategy — Energy Expenditures (2013) it saves money for consumers and businesses, reduces the need for costly and controversial new power plants, Total energy expenditures: $ 22.8 billion increases the reliability of energy supply, cuts pollution Ranking, energy expenditures: 23 and greenhouse gas emissions, and lowers energy Energy expenditures per capita: $ 3,434 imports.
[Show full text]
Data Center Energy: the Novel Therm Way
Data Center Energy: The Novel Therm Way Executive Summary: Novel Therm has a unique solution that allows them to build low- cost HPC data centers that are powered by low temperature geothermal energy. With their innovative technology, they provide 100% green powered data centers with no upfront customer investment and at significantly lower cost than competitors can offer. Data centers have an insatiable appetite for energy. According to the latest estimates, data centers today are consuming as much as 416 Terawatts of electricity. That accounts for more than 2% of the world’s electricity production and is on par with the pollution caused by the entire aviation industry. While data centers are becoming more efficient in how they use energy, this isn’t enough to counter the growth in overall energy demand from ever expanding usage of computing technology. For example, the number of internet connected devices numbered roughly 26 billion in 2019 and is estimated to skyrocket to more than 75 billion by 2025. All of these devices generate data that needs to be stored, processed and analyzed. Growth in HPC (High Performance Computing) processing workloads is expected to increase by roughly 20% per year. Organizations using HPC include energy production (oil & gas), financial services, pharma/bioscience, manufacturing, academic/research computing, along with users in a large variety of other industries. Squeezing the Juice HPC data centers are experiencing significant electricity- related problems. As systems become larger, their power needs also scale up. With the estimated 20% growth rate in HPC system workload, plenty of organizations are going to find that their local utility will have difficulty supplying increased power to their facilities.
[Show full text]
Engineering Info
Engineering Info To Find Given Formula 1. Basic Geometry Circumference of a circle Diameter Circumference = 3.1416 x diameter Diameter of a circle Circumference Diameter = Circumference / 3.1416 2. Motion Ratio High Speed & Low Speed Ratio = RPM High RPM Low RPM Feet per Minute of Belt RPM = FPM and Pulley Diameter .262 x diameter in inches Belt Speed Feet per Minute RPM & Pulley Diameter FPM = .262 x RPM x diameter in inches Ratio Teeth of Pinion & Teeth of Gear Ratio = Teeth of Gear Teeth of Pinion Ratio Two Sprockets or Pulley Diameters Ratio = Diameter Driven Diameter Driver 3. Force - Work - Torque Force (F) Torque & Diameter F = Torque x 2 Diameter Torque (T) Force & Diameter T = ( F x Diameter) / 2 Diameter (Dia.) Torque & Force Diameter = (2 x T) / F Work Force & Distance Work = Force x Distance Chain Pull Torque & Diameter Pull = (T x 2) / Diameter 4. Power Chain Pull Horsepower & Speed (FPM) Pull = (33,000 x HP)/ Speed Horsepower Force & Speed (FPM) HP = (Force x Speed) / 33,000 Horsepower RPM & Torque (#in.) HP = (Torque x RPM) / 63025 Horsepower RPM & Torque (#ft.) HP = (Torque x RPM) / 5250 Torque HP & RPM T #in. = (63025 x HP) / RPM Torque HP & RPM T #ft. = (5250 x HP) / RPM 5. Inertia Accelerating Torque (#ft.) WK2, RMP, Time T = WK2 x RPM 308 x Time Accelerating Time (Sec.) Torque, WK2, RPM t = WK2 x RPM 308 x Torque WK2 at motor WK2 at Load, Ratio WK2 Motor = WK2 Ratio2 6. Gearing Gearset Centers Pd Gear & Pd Pinion Centers = ( PdG + PdP ) / 2 Pitch Diameter No. of Teeth & Diametral Pitch Pd = Teeth / DP Pitch Diameter No.
[Show full text]
3.Joule's Experiments
The Force of Gravity Creates Energy: The “Work” of James Prescott Joule http://www.bookrags.com/biography/james-prescott-joule-wsd/ James Prescott Joule (1818-1889) was the son of a successful British brewer. He tinkered with the tools of his father’s trade (particularly thermometers), and despite never earning an undergraduate degree, he was able to answer two rather simple questions: 1. Why is the temperature of the water at the bottom of a waterfall higher than the temperature at the top? 2. Why does an electrical current flowing through a conductor raise the temperature of water? In order to adequately investigate these questions on our own, we need to first define “temperature” and “energy.” Second, we should determine how the measurement of temperature can relate to “heat” (as energy). Third, we need to find relationships that might exist between temperature and “mechanical” energy and also between temperature and “electrical” energy. Definitions: Before continuing, please write down what you know about temperature and energy below. If you require more space, use the back. Temperature: Energy: We have used the concept of gravity to show how acceleration of freely falling objects is related mathematically to distance, time, and speed. We have also used the relationship between net force applied through a distance to define “work” in the Harvard Step Test. Now, through the work of Joule, we can equate the concepts of “work” and “energy”: Energy is the capacity of a physical system to do work. Potential energy is “stored” energy, kinetic energy is “moving” energy. One type of potential energy is that induced by the gravitational force between two objects held at a distance (there are other types of potential energy, including electrical, magnetic, chemical, nuclear, etc).
[Show full text]
An Atomic Physics Perspective on the New Kilogram Defined by Planck's Constant
An atomic physics perspective on the new kilogram defined by Planck’s constant (Wolfgang Ketterle and Alan O. Jamison, MIT) (Manuscript submitted to Physics Today) On May 20, the kilogram will no longer be defined by the artefact in Paris, but through the definition1 of Planck’s constant h=6.626 070 15*10-34 kg m2/s. This is the result of advances in metrology: The best two measurements of h, the Watt balance and the silicon spheres, have now reached an accuracy similar to the mass drift of the ur-kilogram in Paris over 130 years. At this point, the General Conference on Weights and Measures decided to use the precisely measured numerical value of h as the definition of h, which then defines the unit of the kilogram. But how can we now explain in simple terms what exactly one kilogram is? How do fixed numerical values of h, the speed of light c and the Cs hyperfine frequency νCs define the kilogram? In this article we give a simple conceptual picture of the new kilogram and relate it to the practical realizations of the kilogram. A similar change occurred in 1983 for the definition of the meter when the speed of light was defined to be 299 792 458 m/s. Since the second was the time required for 9 192 631 770 oscillations of hyperfine radiation from a cesium atom, defining the speed of light defined the meter as the distance travelled by light in 1/9192631770 of a second, or equivalently, as 9192631770/299792458 times the wavelength of the cesium hyperfine radiation.
[Show full text]
History of a Forgotten Engine Alex Cannella, News Editor
POWER PLAY History of a Forgotten Engine Alex Cannella, News Editor In 2017, there’s more variety to be found un- der the hood of a car than ever. Electric, hybrid and internal combustion engines all sit next to a range of trans- mission types, creating an ever-increasingly complex evolu- tionary web of technology choices for what we put into our automobiles. But every evolutionary tree has a few dead end branches that ended up never going anywhere. One such branch has an interesting and somewhat storied history, but it’s a history that’s been largely forgotten outside of columns describing quirky engineering marvels like this one. The sleeve-valve engine was an invention that came at the turn of the 20th century and saw scattered use between its inception and World War II. But afterwards, it fell into obscurity, outpaced (By Andy Dingley (scanner) - Scan from The Autocar (Ninth edition, circa 1919) Autocar Handbook, London: Iliffe & Sons., pp. p. 38,fig. 21, Public Domain, by the poppet valves we use in engines today that, ironically, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8771152) it was initially developed to replace. Back when the sleeve-valve engine was first developed, through the economic downturn, and by the time the econ- the poppet valves in internal combustion engines were ex- omy was looking up again, poppet valve engines had caught tremely noisy contraptions, a concern that likely sounds fa- up to the sleeve-valve and were quickly becoming just as miliar to anyone in the automotive industry today. Charles quiet and efficient.
[Show full text]
Work and Energy Summary Sheet Chapter 6
Work and Energy Summary Sheet Chapter 6 Work: work is done when a force is applied to a mass through a displacement or W=Fd. The force and the displacement must be parallel to one another in order for work to be done. F (N) W =(Fcosθ)d F If the force is not parallel to The area of a force vs. the displacement, then the displacement graph + W component of the force that represents the work θ d (m) is parallel must be found. done by the varying - W d force. Signs and Units for Work Work is a scalar but it can be positive or negative. Units of Work F d W = + (Ex: pitcher throwing ball) 1 N•m = 1 J (Joule) F d W = - (Ex. catcher catching ball) Note: N = kg m/s2 • Work – Energy Principle Hooke’s Law x The work done on an object is equal to its change F = kx in kinetic energy. F F is the applied force. 2 2 x W = ΔEk = ½ mvf – ½ mvi x is the change in length. k is the spring constant. F Energy Defined Units Energy is the ability to do work. Same as work: 1 N•m = 1 J (Joule) Kinetic Energy Potential Energy Potential energy is stored energy due to a system’s shape, position, or Kinetic energy is the energy of state. motion. If a mass has velocity, Gravitational PE Elastic (Spring) PE then it has KE 2 Mass with height Stretch/compress elastic material Ek = ½ mv 2 EG = mgh EE = ½ kx To measure the change in KE Change in E use: G Change in ES 2 2 2 2 ΔEk = ½ mvf – ½ mvi ΔEG = mghf – mghi ΔEE = ½ kxf – ½ kxi Conservation of Energy “The total energy is neither increased nor decreased in any process.
[Show full text]
Active Short Circuit - Chassis Short Characterization and Potential Mitigation Technique for the MMRTG
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Multi-Mission RTG Active Short Circuit - Chassis Short Characterization and Potential Mitigation Technique for the MMRTG February 25, 2015 Gary Bolotin1 Nicholas Keyawa1 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Agenda Multi-Mission RTG • Introduction – MMRTG – Internal MMRTG Chassis Shorts • Active Short Circuit Purpose • Active Short Circuit Theory • Active Short Design and Component Layout • Conclusion and Future Work 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Introduction – MMRTG Multi-Mission RTG • The Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) utilizes a combination of PbTe, PbSnTe, and TAGS thermoelectric couples to produce electric current from the heat generated by the radioactive decay of plutonium – 238. 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory Introduction – Internal MMRTG Chassis California Institute of Technology Shorts Multi-Mission RTG • Shorts inside the MMRTG between the electrical power circuit and the MMRTG chassis have been detected via isolation checks and/or changes in the bus balance voltage. • Example location of short shown below MMRTG Chassis Internal MMRTG Short 4 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Active Short Circuit Purpose Multi-Mission RTG • The leading hypothesis suggests that the FOD which is causing the internal shorts are extremely small pieces of material that could potentially melt and/or sublimate away given a sufficient amount of current. • By inducing a controlled second short (in the presence of an internal MMRTG chassis short), a significant amount of current flow can be generated to achieve three main design goals: 1) Measure and characterize the MMRTG internal short to chassis, 2) Safely determine if the MMRTG internal short can be cleared in the presence of another controlled short 3) Quantify the amount of energy required to clear the MMRTG internal short.
[Show full text]
Investigation Into the Energy Consumption of a Data Center with a Thermosyphon Heat Exchanger
Article Mechanical Engineering July 2011 Vol.56 No.20: 21852190 doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4500-5 SPECIAL TOPICS: Investigation into the energy consumption of a data center with a thermosyphon heat exchanger ZHOU Feng, TIAN Xin & MA GuoYuan* College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China Received October 18, 2010; accepted February 17, 2011 A data center test model was used to analyze the energy dissipation characteristics and energy consumption of a data center. The results indicate that adequate heat dissipation from a data center cannot be achieved only from heat dissipation through the build- ing envelope during Beijing winter conditions. This is because heat dissipation through the building envelope covers about 19.5% of the total data center heat load. The average energy consumption for an air conditioner is 4 to 5 kW over a 24-h period. The temperature difference between the indoor and outdoor air for the data center with a thermosyphon heat exchanger is less than 20°C. The energy consumption of the thermosyphon heat exchanger is only 41% of that of an air conditioner. The annual energy consumption can be reduced by 35.4% with a thermosyphon system. In addition, the effect of the outdoor temperature on the en- ergy consumption of an air conditioner is greater than the indoor room temperature. The energy consumption of an air conditioner system increases by 5% to 6% for every 1°C rise in the outdoor temperature. data center, energy consumption, thermosyphon heat exchanger, ambient energy Citation: Zhou F, Tian X, Ma G Y.
[Show full text]
Re-Examining the Role of Nuclear Fusion in a Renewables-Based Energy Mix
Re-examining the Role of Nuclear Fusion in a Renewables-Based Energy Mix T. E. G. Nicholasa,∗, T. P. Davisb, F. Federicia, J. E. Lelandc, B. S. Patela, C. Vincentd, S. H. Warda a York Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK b Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH c Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GJ, UK d Centre for Advanced Instrumentation, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LS, UK Abstract Fusion energy is often regarded as a long-term solution to the world's energy needs. However, even after solving the critical research challenges, engineer- ing and materials science will still impose significant constraints on the char- acteristics of a fusion power plant. Meanwhile, the global energy grid must transition to low-carbon sources by 2050 to prevent the worst effects of climate change. We review three factors affecting fusion's future trajectory: (1) the sig- nificant drop in the price of renewable energy, (2) the intermittency of renewable sources and implications for future energy grids, and (3) the recent proposition of intermediate-level nuclear waste as a product of fusion. Within the scenario assumed by our premises, we find that while there remains a clear motivation to develop fusion power plants, this motivation is likely weakened by the time they become available. We also conclude that most current fusion reactor designs do not take these factors into account and, to increase market penetration, fu- sion research should consider relaxed nuclear waste design criteria, raw material availability constraints and load-following designs with pulsed operation.
[Show full text]