DOCSLIB.ORG

Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society TRANSACTIONS of the NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY Volume 47 Part 1 2014 & Volume 48 Part 1 2015 combined Natural History Museum Library TRANSACTIONS OF ooo2266oa_ .._ { NATURALISTS' SOCIETY Volume47 Parti 2014 & Volume 48 Parti 2015 (published April 2016) Editor: AR Leech Assistant Editors: S Harrap & NW Owens Published by the Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists' Society www.nnns.org.uk Contributions for Volume 49 (2016) should be sent to the Editor, Nick Owens, 22 Springfield Close, Weybourne, Holt, Norfolk NR25 7TB [email protected], from whom notes for contributors can be obtained. The Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists'Society has as a principal aim the investigation and recording of Norfolk's wildlife and to this end it publishes: • An annual volume of Transactions, consisting of papers and notes on wildlife in the county. • The Norfolk Bird and Mammal Report which contains systematic lists of observations on the county's birds and mammals, as well as relevant articles. • The Norfolk Natterjack, a quarterly illustrated newsletter. All of these publications are free to members, as are Occasional Publications on specific topics. The Society also arranges lectures and field meetings which are planned to appeal to anyone interested in natural history. More specialist groups cover many aspects of the county's flora and fauna. The subscription rate is £20 per year, which includes all members of a family living at the same address. Membership enquiries should be made to: David Richmond, 42 Richmond Rise, Reepham, Norfolk, NR10 4LS, All other enquiries should be directed to the Secretary, Nick Owens, 22 Springfield Close, Weybourne, Holt, Norfolk NR25 7TB.Tel: 01263 588410. The Society gratefully acknowledges the support of the Sarnia Trust in the production of this publication. ISSN 0375 7226 © Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists' Society 2014 Charity No. 291604 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electrical, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission, except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988. Applications for permission should be addressed to the Secretary (see address see website: www.nnns.org.uk). Printed by Barnwell Print Ltd, Aylsham, Norfolk NR11 6SU.Tel: 01263 732767 > rr L» j csj Vegetation development in the Broadland fens X 1 < - LU CO Jo Parmenter P LD < Introduction litter/fodder mowing, and grazing: “On the The Broadland fens form part of a complex basis of the information available, turbary2 and extensive mosaic of waterways, shallow would seem to be the most economically lakes, grazing marsh, woodland and arable important and widespread historic land land occupying approximately 300 km2 use, followed by the cutting of various (George 1992). This area of land lies in the types of vegetation (litter, reed, sedge valleys of three major rivers; the Bure, Yare etc.), and lastly, grazing. Turbary was and Waveney, and their main tributaries, particularly prominent in the medieval the Ant, Thurne, and Muckfleet. See Fig. 1 period, producing the deep, water-filled for map of Broadland fens. basins which dominate the landscape to the present day, but peat cutting continued until Over two-thirds of the Broadland landscape the early 20th century. During the medieval is managed as agricultural land; either and post-medieval periods the demand for intensively managed pasture (grazing marsh) litter and fodder is likely to have risen with or'high quality arable land. Much of the the increasing population. By the late 18th remainder is seminatural vegetation or open century, it was possibly as important as peat water. The Broads National Character Area cutting to the local economy and probably Profile (http://publications.naturalengland. greatly exceeded the importance of reed and org.uk/publication/11549064) records that sedge cutting. over 7,000 ha of land is nationally designated as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Peat has been cut for fuel in Broadland for with international designations including over 1000 years. The increased use of peat three Special Protection Areas (SPA), two as a fuel source from the late Saxon period Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and onwards led to the creation of extensive two Ramsar sites. Key habitats include turbaries in Broadland. A large proportion grazing marsh (c.12,300 ha) and fen and of the floodplain, and possibly over 75% reedbed (c.10,400 ha), as well as the most of the land area in the middle and upper extensive tract of wet woodland within floodplains, has been cut for peat. Many eastern England. A number of iconic species of the fen communities which are found are present in the Broads, including 95% of growing over the former turbaries are the UK population of Fen Orchid Liparis relatively recent in origin and the great loeselii var. loeselii1 (Mason 2014), and the majority of the colonisation of open water entire UK population of the Swallowtail by fen vegetation has taken place over butterfly Papilio machaon Both of these the last 175 years. The apparently sudden species are restricted to fen habitat. proliferation of fen communities over the medieval turbaries was in most cases in Principal environmental and response to the accumulation of lake mud anthropogenic influences upon fen and sediment to the point when the basin vegetation became sufficiently shallow to enable colonisation by swamp species (Lambert Five principal uses have historically been 1965). made of the Broadland fens. These were peat cutting, reed cutting, sedge cutting, The shallowest of the former medieval broad basins, at Dilham and Sutton, have already 1 See Appendix for English names of plants referred to in the text. succeeded to fen. Substantial areas of open Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 2014 47(1) 1 kilometres Figure 1. Location of fen sites within The Broads area. Key opposite. 2 Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 2014 47(1) The River Ant Fens 28 Upton Fen & The Doles 1 East Ruston Common, Honing Common 29 AcleCarrs & FishleyCarrs & Dilham Broad 30 Decoy CarrAcle 2 South Fen & The Holmes 31 Halvergate Marshes 3 Broad Fen & Smallburgh Fen 32 Wickhampton Marshes & The Fleet 4 Barton Fen, Common Fen & Stalham Fens Marshes 5 Sutton Fen, Sutton Broad & Hand Marsh The River Yare Fens & Ronds 6 Barton Broad Fens & The Heater 33 Whitlingham Marshes & Thorpe Marshes 7 Catfield Fen 34 Surlingham Church Marshes & Kirby Marshes 8 Reedham Marshes, Snipe Marsh, Hall Fen & Alderfen 35 Surlingham Broad Marshes, Bargate & The Outmeadows The River Thurne Fens 36 Bradeston & Strumpshaw Marshes & 9 Horsey Mere, Brayden Marshes & Long Strumpshaw Common Gore Marsh 37 Surlingham Marsh, Wheatfen & Rockland 10 Skoyles Marsh, 100 Acre Marsh, Whiteslea Marshes & Meadow Dyke (North) 38 Ducans Marsh & Carleton Broad Marshes 11 Hickling Broad Marshes & Mrs Myhills 39 Buckenham & Hassingham Carrs & Marsh Buckenham Ronds 12 Heigham Sound, Meadow Dyke (South) 40 Poplar Farm Marshes, Limpenhoe & Sound Marshes Marshes & Cantley Ronds 13 Mere Farm Marshes, Starch Grass & 41 Hardley Flood, Chedgrave Common & Martham Broad Marshes Loddon Common 14 Potter Heigham Fen & Martham Marshes 42 Thurlton Beck Marshes 15 Womack Water Marshes & Shallam Dyke 43 Reedham Ronds The Muckfleet Fens The River Waveney Fens & Ronds 16 Ormesby Common, Ormesby Broad 44 Glebe Marshes & Burgh Castle Ronds Marshes & Hemsby Common 45 Belton Ronds 17 Rollesby Broad Marshes 46 Belton Bog & Bradwell Doles 18 Burgh Common & Filby Broad Marshes 47 Fritton Ronds The River Bure Fens 48 Fritton Decoy & Ashby Warren 19 Coltishall Marsh & Blackmans Fen 49 Herringfleet Ronds 20 Crostwick Marsh & Dobbs Beck Marshes 50 Wheatacre Marshes 21 Belaugh, Wroxham & Jubys Farm 51 Flixton Decoy, Wicker Well & Marshes Summerhouse Water 22 Snapes Water, Hoveton Marsh, Sedge Fen 52 Somerleyton & Blundeston Ronds & Salhouse Marshes 53 Burgh St Peter & Barnby Ronds 23 Woodbastwick Marshes & Hoveton Little Broad & The Lows 54 Barnby Broad & Marshes, North Cove & Wadehall Marshes 24 Ranworth Broad Marshes & Horning 55 Oulton Marshes, White Cast Marshes & Church Marshes Sprats Water 25 Horning Hall Marshes & Hulver Ground 56 Beccles Marshes, Wild Carr & Stanley & 26 Ranworth Marshes & Ward Marsh Alder Carrs 27 Ranworth Flood, Leists Marsh & South 57 Roos Hall Marshes, Barsham Marshes & Walsham Fen Geldeston Marshes Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 2014 47(1) 3 water at Hickling Broad, Ranworth Broad individuals to make choices about the and Heigham Sound have also become way in which they would manage their grown over. The deeper basins, such as those land. Enclosure increased exploitation of at Trinity Broads and Fritton Decoy, are still fenland for mutually exclusive purposes, relatively open. The colonisation of the Yare such as turbary or litter cutting. It also valley broads by swamp and subsequently encouraged a much more organised fen vegetation has progressed much faster pattern of management and specialisation than elsewhere in Broadland, apparently of land use towards particular marketable because of the ability of Reed Sweet-grass fen products such as reed and sedge, rather Glyceria maxima to colonise quite deep water than continuing to manage one area of land without the necessity of being rooted in the for a number of different purposes. The underlying substrate (Lambert 1965). decision whether to cut peat or whether to harvest fen crops was probably largely Before enclosure, much of the upper valley an economic one, although the existing floodplain was held in common. Common vegetation would have to some extent fenland would have been used to supply determined the way in which the fen was a variety of commodities, including reed, managed. sedge, litter and peat. The most essential types of fen produce were peat for fuel Some areas of fen, particularly those which and fodder for feeding domestic animals, had undergone substantial terrestrialisation however the management regime had to or those on solid peat, have been grazed take into account the differing requirements in the past, usually in the drier summer of a large number of people and common months.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commision for England Electoral Review of South Norfolk
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SOUTH NORFOLK E Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of South Norfolk March 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 OLD COSTESSEY COSTESSEY CP EASTON CP D C This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestry's Stationary Office @ Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil preceedings. NEW COSTESSEY The Local Governement Boundary Commision for England GD100049926 2017. B Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information MARLINGFORD AND COLTON CP applied as part of this review. BAWBURGH CP BRANDON PARVA, COSTON, A RUNHALL AND WELBORNE CP EASTON BARNHAM BROOM CP BARFORD CP COLNEY CP HETHERSETT TROWSE WITH LITTLE MELTON CP NEWTON CP SURLINGHAM CP GREAT MELTON CP KIRBY BEDON CP CRINGLEFORD WRAMPLINGHAM CP CRINGLEFORD CP KIMBERLEY CP HETHERSETT CP BIXLEY CP WICKLEWOOD BRAMERTON CP ROCKLAND ST MARY CP KESWICK AND INTWOOD CP PORINGLAND, ROCKLAND FRAMINGHAM FRAMINGHAMS & TROWSE PIGOT CP H CAISTOR ST EDMUND CP H CLAXTON CP NORTH WYMONDHAM P O P C L C M V A E H R R C S E G T IN P O T ER SWARDESTON CP N HELLINGTON E T FRAMINGHAM YELVERTON P T CP KE EARL CP CP T S N O T E G EAST CARLETON CP L WICKLEWOOD CP F STOKE HOLY CROSS CP ASHBY ST MARY CP R A C ALPINGTON CP HINGHAM CP PORINGLAND CP LANGLEY WITH HARDLEY CP HINGHAM & DEOPHAM CENTRAL
    [Show full text]
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
    Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations & Policies Document, Wymondham Area Action Plan, Long Stratton Area Action Plan and Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan, undertaken for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Natural Environment Team HRA of Site Allocations Document, Wymondham AAP, Long Stratton AAP and Cringleford Neighbourhood Plan for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations and Policies Document, the Wymondham Area Action Plan, the Long Stratton Area Action Plan and the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan Executive Summary As required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, before deciding to give consent or permission for a plan or project which is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, the competent authority is required to make an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives. This document is a record of the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Sites Allocation Document, undertaken for South Norfolk Council. Additionally, proposed development at Wymondham, as described in the emerging Wymondham Area Action Plan, at Long Stratton, as described in the emerging Long Stratton Area Action Plan and proposed housing in the parish of Cringleford, guided by the emerging Cringleford Draft Neighbourhood Plan, are assessed Three groups of plans are reviewed with respect to their conclusions with respect to potential in-combination effects. These are plans for The Greater Norwich Development Partnership, Great Yarmouth Borough Council, Breckland District Council, and The Broads Authority including local development plans and the Tourism Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Ouse and Waveney Project
    Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project May 2006 214980-UA02/01/B - 12th May 2006 Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 13 th Jan J. For January TEN A E. Lunt 2006 Purseglove workshop 24 th May E. Lunt J. B Draft for Comment 2006 Purseglove This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any o ther project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a pur pose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage re sulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Holland's Duinen Nr. 57, April 2011
    Informatie over het duinonderzoek in Berkheide, Meijendel en Solleveld Nummer 57 april 2011 Omslag Holland's Duinen 57.indd 1 11-4-11 17:12 H O L L A N D ’ S D U I N E N Informatie over het duinonderzoek in Berkheide, Meijendel en Solleveld 1 Holland’s Duinen nr 57, april 2011 Inhoud H. Lucas. Het duin... een dierentuin? 3 - 5 R. Beringen en W. van der Slikke. Flora-monitoring in Meijendel, Berkheide en Solleveld 6 - 15 W. Moerland. Nachtvlinderonderzoek in de Wassenaarse duinen 16 - 31 H.E. Kirk. Natuurlijke hybridisatie tussen Senecio jacobaea en Senecio aquaticus 32 - 36 I. Kruisinga-Zanen. Bijzondere vondsten in hok 83 - 462 38 - 39 P.N. Peperkamp en R. Wielinga. Onderzoek naar het effect van de begrazing op de mycoflora van Solleveld 2009-2010 40 - 45 F.C. Hooijmans en A. Remeeus. Vlinders in Meijendel: aantallen in 2010 langs twee telroutes 46 - 49 T. van Schie. Aalscholvers in Solleveld 50 - 51 F.C. Hooijmans. Broedvogelmonitoring Meijendel 2009 52 - 69 Colofon 72 REDACTIONEEL Opnieuw zijn een aantal tekeningen van Pia Sprong opgenomen. Dit nummer herbergt weer een breed scala aan interessante onderwerpen. Het opent met: is het duin een dierentuin aan het worden? Daarna volgen diverse artikelen met reeksen van inventarisaties, die vooral door vrijwilligers worden uitgevoerd en waar Dunea een beperkte bijdrage heeft. Het Landelijk Meetnet Flora aandachtssoorten (LMF-a) is lokaal voortgezet en nu bijna 12 jaar: tijd voor een stand van zaken en een blik in de toekomst of het netwerk een bijdrage kan leveren als kwaliteitsparameter voor Natura2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Farmhouse in Unspoilt Position
    Georgian farmhouse in unspoilt position Grove House, Irstead, Norfolk Freehold Entrance hall • Drawing room • Dining room • Kitchen/ breakfast room with Aga • Study • Utility room • Old dairy Studio • Cloakroom/WC • Cellar • Six bedrooms • Family bathroom • Shower room • Outbuildings including barn Garaging • Mooring rights nearby • Mature gardens and grounds in all about 0.48 of an acre The Property traditionally constructed of red Grove House is a most brick and providing garaging attractive Grade II listed and workshop/storage space. Georgian farmhouse of circa The land in all extends to about 1820 with earlier origins 0.48 of an acre. believed to date to the 17th century. The house has elegant Situation and well-proportioned rooms Irstead is a small unspoilt rural typical of the period and lit by hamlet lying between Horning fine sash windows. Much and Neatishead. The village of period detail remains Neatishead is about half a mile throughout the house which and has a community village was acquired by the current shop and traditional pub. There owners in 1991 and who carried is a new village hall which hosts out a sensitive and faithful a number of local events. The programme of renovation and village of Irstead itself is about restoration. a mile and there is access via a boardwalk with fine walks Outside around the periphery of Barton The house is approached by a Broad nearby. The bustling gravelled drive to the east of riverside village of Horning the house which finishes in a (about two miles) has further large gravelled turning and everyday shopping including a parking space to the north of delicatessen, three public the house.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Steppe Lebt
    Buchrücken 1200 Stück:Layout 1 04.04.2008 14:39 Seite 1 Die Steppe lebt Felssteppen und Trockenrasen in Niederösterreich Heinz Wiesbauer (Hrsg.) Die Steppe lebt ISBN 3-901542-28-0 Die Steppe lebt Felssteppen und Trockenrasen in Niederösterreich Heinz Wiesbauer (Hrsg.) Mit Beiträgen von Roland Albert, Horst Aspöck, Ulrike Aspöck, Hans-Martin Berg, Peter Buchner, Erhard Christian, Margret Bunzel-Drüke, Manuel Denner, Joachim Drüke, Michael Duda, Rudolf Eis, Karin Enzinger, Ursula Göhlich, Mathias Harzhauser, Johannes Hill, Werner Holzinger, Franz Humer, Rudolf Klepsch, Brigitte Komposch, Christian Komposch, Ernst Lauermann, Erwin Neumeister, Mathias Pacher, Wolfgang Rabitsch, Birgit C. Schlick-Steiner, Luise Schratt-Ehrendorfer, Florian M. Steiner, Otto H. Urban, Henning Vierhaus, Wolfgang Waitzbauer, Heinz Wiesbauer und Herbert Zettel St. Pölten 2008 Die Steppe lebt – Felssteppen und Trockenrasen in Niederösterreich Begleitband zur gleichnamigen Ausstellung in Hainburg an der Donau Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. ISBN 3-901542-28-0 Die Erstellung des Buches wurde aus Mitteln von LIFE-Natur gefördert. LIFE-Natur-Projekt „Pannonische Steppen und Trockenrasen“ Gestaltung: Manuel Denner und Heinz Wiesbauer Lektorat: caout:chouc Umschlagbilder: Heinz Wiesbauer Druck: Gugler Druck, Melk Medieninhaber: Amt der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Naturschutz Landhausplatz 1 A-3109 St. Pölten Bestellung: Tel.: +43/(0)2742/9005-15238 oder [email protected] © 2008 Autoren der jeweiligen Beiträge, Bilder: Bildautoren Sämtliche Rechte vorbehalten Inhalt 1. Einleitung 5 2. Eiszeitliche Steppen und Großsäuger 9 2.1 Was ist Eiszeit? 11 2.2 Die Tierwelt der Eiszeit 14 2.3 Der Einfluss von Großherbivoren auf die Naturlandschaft Mitteleuropas 17 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 233 08 SD50 Environment Permitting Decision Document
    Environment Agency permitting decisions Bespoke permit We have decided to grant the permit for Didlington Farm Poultry Unit operated by Mr Robert Anderson, Mrs Rosamond Anderson and Mr Marcus Anderson. The permit number is EPR/EP3937EP. We consider in reaching that decision we have taken into account all relevant considerations and legal requirements and that the permit will ensure that the appropriate level of environmental protection is provided. Purpose of this document This decision document: • explains how the application has been determined • provides a record of the decision-making process • shows how all relevant factors have been taken into account • justifies the specific conditions in the permit other than those in our generic permit template. Unless the decision document specifies otherwise we have accepted the applicant’s proposals. Structure of this document • Key issues • Annex 1 the decision checklist • Annex 2 the consultation, web publicising responses. EPR/EP3937EP/A001 Page 1 of 12 Key Issues 1) Ammonia Impacts There are two Special Areas for Conservation (SAC) within 3.4km, one Special Protection Area (SPA) within 850m, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 4.9km and six Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) within 1.4km of the facility, one of which is within 250m. Assessment of SAC and SPA If the Process Contribution (PC) is below 4% of the relevant critical level (CLe) or critical load (CLo) then the farm can be permitted with no further assessment. Initial screening using Ammonia Screening Tool (AST) v4.4 has indicated that the PC for Breckland SAC, Norfolk Valley Fens SAC and Breckland SPA is predicted to be greater than 4% of the CLe for ammonia.
    [Show full text]