DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Portfolio Holdings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Portfolio Holdings Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund Full Portfolio Holdings* as of July 31, 2021 % of Security Coupon Maturity Shares/Par Market Value Net Assets Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds, 0.010 12/31/2050 26,625,331 26,625,331 3.270 Treasury Portfolio, Institutional Class, 0.01% Assurant, Inc. 0.000 143,541 22,652,205 2.782 Advance Auto Parts, Inc. 0.000 86,510 18,345,311 2.253 Nordson Corp. 0.000 80,753 18,260,676 2.243 Catalent, Inc. 0.000 136,907 16,402,828 2.015 Black Knight, Inc. 0.000 194,897 16,139,421 1.982 Hershey Co. 0.000 84,869 15,181,367 1.865 Encompass Health Corp. 0.000 177,637 14,788,280 1.816 IDEX Corp. 0.000 63,165 14,318,874 1.759 Arthur J Gallagher & Co. 0.000 98,539 13,727,468 1.686 Genpact Ltd. 0.000 275,463 13,720,812 1.685 Motorola Solutions, Inc. 0.000 61,025 13,664,718 1.678 Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. 0.000 140,187 13,664,027 1.678 Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.000 67,285 13,547,162 1.664 Microchip Technology, Inc. 0.000 94,541 13,530,708 1.662 Teleflex, Inc. 0.000 32,530 12,928,398 1.588 TE Connectivity Ltd. 0.000 87,316 12,876,491 1.582 ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.000 325,392 12,709,812 1.561 Masimo Corp. 0.000 46,628 12,701,001 1.560 VeriSign, Inc. 0.000 56,967 12,325,950 1.514 Leidos Holdings, Inc. 0.000 114,386 12,172,958 1.495 First Republic Bank 0.000 61,909 12,073,493 1.483 PTC, Inc. 0.000 88,879 12,038,661 1.479 LKQ Corp. 0.000 236,286 11,991,515 1.473 FirstEnergy Corp. 0.000 312,586 11,978,296 1.471 Burlington Stores, Inc. 0.000 35,638 11,931,602 1.466 Dover Corp. 0.000 71,061 11,875,714 1.459 Waste Connections, Inc. 0.000 92,547 11,724,779 1.440 Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. 0.000 65,537 11,365,427 1.396 Entegris, Inc. 0.000 94,146 11,357,773 1.395 SEI Investments Co. 0.000 186,695 11,351,056 1.394 Brunswick Corp. 0.000 108,630 11,340,972 1.393 West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 0.000 27,389 11,276,873 1.385 CDW Corp. 0.000 59,787 10,961,946 1.346 Amdocs Ltd. 0.000 141,777 10,932,424 1.343 Robert Half International, Inc. 0.000 111,064 10,907,595 1.340 Verisk Analytics, Inc. 0.000 56,606 10,751,744 1.321 Cooper Cos., Inc. 0.000 25,141 10,603,720 1.302 Trane Technologies plc 0.000 50,879 10,359,473 1.272 Dolby Laboratories, Inc. 0.000 104,317 10,129,181 1.244 Crown Holdings, Inc. 0.000 101,296 10,105,289 1.241 Aramark 0.000 286,800 10,075,284 1.238 Churchill Downs, Inc. 0.000 52,526 9,759,331 1.199 Globe Life, Inc. 0.000 104,419 9,722,453 1.194 Page 1 of 3 HARTFORD FUNDS 07.31.21(unaudited) Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund Full Portfolio Holdings* as of July 31, 2021 % of Security Coupon Maturity Shares/Par Market Value Net Assets Americold Realty Trust 0.000 249,005 9,673,844 1.188 Ryan Specialty Group Holdings, Inc. 0.000 325,334 9,597,353 1.179 Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. 0.000 86,735 9,556,462 1.174 Fifth Third Bancorp 0.000 260,254 9,444,618 1.160 Brixmor Property Group, Inc. 0.000 408,457 9,402,680 1.155 Alliant Energy Corp. 0.000 152,868 8,947,364 1.099 BWX Technologies, Inc. 0.000 149,937 8,610,882 1.058 Raymond James Financial, Inc. 0.000 65,798 8,519,525 1.046 Ciena Corp. 0.000 145,272 8,446,114 1.037 Snap-on, Inc. 0.000 38,083 8,301,332 1.020 Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 0.000 20,765 8,286,273 1.018 Westlake Chemical Corp. 0.000 98,961 8,205,846 1.008 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 0.000 319,852 8,143,432 1.000 Mohawk Industries, Inc. 0.000 41,046 7,999,865 0.983 Interpublic Group of Cos., Inc. 0.000 221,202 7,821,703 0.961 Commerce Bancshares, Inc. 0.000 106,318 7,519,872 0.924 Teledyne Technologies, Inc. 0.000 16,034 7,259,714 0.892 Casey's General Stores, Inc. 0.000 36,194 7,155,916 0.879 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 0.000 43,722 6,675,912 0.820 Pioneer Natural Resources Co. 0.000 45,628 6,632,942 0.815 IAA, Inc. 0.000 106,948 6,468,215 0.794 American Homes 4 Rent 0.000 151,997 6,383,874 0.784 Pentair plc 0.000 84,154 6,199,625 0.761 CMS Energy Corp. 0.000 100,114 6,186,044 0.760 Teradata Corp. 0.000 123,340 6,125,064 0.752 NiSource, Inc. 0.000 240,353 5,953,544 0.731 Match Group, Inc. 0.000 35,966 5,728,305 0.704 AptarGroup, Inc. 0.000 44,237 5,703,034 0.700 Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. 0.000 185,770 5,591,677 0.687 Royalty Pharma plc 0.000 139,536 5,330,275 0.655 Diamondback Energy, Inc. 0.000 63,398 4,889,888 0.601 Eversource Energy 0.000 51,098 4,408,224 0.541 First Solar, Inc. 0.000 44,680 3,844,267 0.472 Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds, 0.010 12/31/2030 253 253 0.000 Treasury Portfolio, Institutional Class, 0.01% Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds, 0.000 12/31/2030 208 208 0.000 Treasury Portfolio, Institutional Class, 0.01% OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES 247,371 0.030 TOTAL NET ASSETS 814,159,916 Page 2 of 3 HARTFORD FUNDS 07.31.21(unaudited) Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund Full Portfolio Holdings* as of July 31, 2021 * This unaudited information is being presented pursuant to the Fund’s Policy on Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings. A discussion of the Fund’s policy may be viewed in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information on hartfordfunds.com. Please note that certain Fund holdings (including, but not limited to, foreign currencies, currency contracts, equity and debt futures, equity and debt options, equity swaps and short-term investments) may have been included under “Other Assets” and may not be listed separately. For a complete list of portfolio holdings, please contact Hartford Funds at 888-843-7824. Investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in a fund’s full prospectus and summary prospectus, which can be obtained by visiting hartfordfunds.com. Please read it carefully before investing. Mutual funds are distributed by Hartford Funds Distributors, LLC (HFD), Member FINRA. Advisory services are provided by Hartford Funds Management Company, LLC (HFMC). Certain funds are sub-advised by Schroder Investment Management North America, Inc. Schroder Investment Management North America Ltd. serves as a secondary sub-adviser. HFD and HFMC are not affiliated with any sub-adviser. 210571 2/21 Page 3 of 3 HARTFORD FUNDS 07.31.21(unaudited).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 03.031 Socc04 Final 2(R)
    STATEOF CENTER CITY 2008 Prepared by Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation May 2008 STATEOF CENTER CITY 2008 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation 660 Chestnut Street Philadelphia PA, 19106 215.440.5500 www.CenterCityPhila.org TABLEOFCONTENTSCONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 OFFICE MARKET 2 HEALTHCARE & EDUCATION 6 HOSPITALITY & TOURISM 10 ARTS & CULTURE 14 RETAIL MARKET 18 EMPLOYMENT 22 TRANSPORTATION & ACCESS 28 RESIDENTIAL MARKET 32 PARKS & RECREATION 36 CENTER CITY DISTRICT PERFORMANCE 38 CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENTS 44 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 48 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation www.CenterCityPhila.org INTRODUCTION CENTER CITY PHILADELPHIA 2007 was a year of positive change in Center City. Even with the new Comcast Tower topping out at 975 feet, overall office occupancy still climbed to 89%, as the expansion of existing firms and several new arrivals downtown pushed Class A rents up 14%. For the first time in 15 years, Center City increased its share of regional office space. Healthcare and educational institutions continued to attract students, patients and research dollars to downtown, while elementary schools experienced strong demand from the growing number of families in Center City with children. The Pennsylvania Convention Center expansion commenced and plans advanced for new hotels, as occupancy and room rates steadily climbed. On Independence Mall, the National Museum of American Jewish History started construction, while the Barnes Foundation retained designers for a new home on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway. Housing prices remained strong, rents steadily climbed and rental vacancy rates dropped to 4.6%, as new residents continued to flock to Center City. While the average condo sold for $428,596, 115 units sold in 2007 for more than $1 million, double the number in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Employer Program Companies*
    Preferred Employer Program Companies* • 3M Company • AutoZone • Cintas • 7-Eleven • Avera Health • Cisco Systems • AAA - (Employees Only) • Avon Products • Citigroup • Abbott Laboratories • Bacardi USA • Citizens Financial Group • AbbVie Corp. • Bank of America Corp. • Cleveland Clinic Foundation • Accenture Ltd. • Baptist Health South Florida • Coca-Cola Bottling Co. • adidas America • Barclays Capital/Stifel Financial • Coldwell Banker Richard Ellis • Advanced Micro Devices • Bausch & Lomb • Compass Group USA • Aflac - (Employees Only) • Bayer Corp. • ConocoPhillips • Alcon Laboratories • Becton, Dickinson and Company • Continental General Tire • ALDI • Berkshire Hathaway • Corning • Allegheny Health Network • BI Worldwide • Costco • Allergan • Biogen Idec • Cowan Systems • Alliance Data • BioReference Labs • Cox Enterprises • Allianz Global Investors of America • Bloomin’ Brands • Credit Suisse Asset Mgmt. • Allstate Insurance Co. - (Employees Only) • Blue Cross Blue Shield - (Employees Only) • CSRA International • Altice • Blue Iron • Cumberland Farms • Amazon • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals • Curtiss-Wright Corp. • American Airlines Credit Union • Boeing Corp. • CVS • American Association of Physicians • Boston Scientific Corp. • Daimler Trucks North America of Indian Origin • BP • Dassault Systèmes • American Express Co. - (Employees Only) • Braintree Laboratories • DealerTrack Holdings • AMETEK • Bristol Myers Squibb • Del Monte Foods • Amgen • Broadcom • Dell • Analog Devices • Brown-Forman • Deloitte & Touche LLP • Anthem
    [Show full text]
  • Name and Title Company and Work Address Email Phone 2020
    Executive Leadership Institute for Women 2020 Philadelphia Class List Name and Title Company and Work Address Email Phone Cigna Michele Adams 215-761-1467 1601 Chestnut Street, TL 14A [email protected] Senior Director, Accounting Policy 267-418-3629 (c) Philadelphia, PA 19192 KPMG, LLP Lauren Albertson 267-256-3183 1601 Market Street [email protected] Senior Manager 215-817-0889 (c) Philadelphia, PA 07677 KPMG, LLP Rupali Amin 267-256-3221 1601 Market Street [email protected] Managing Director 267-210-4331 (c) Philadelphia, PA 07677 KPMG, LLP Abigail (Abby) Aungst 30 North Third Street, Suite 1000 [email protected] 717-507-7707 (c) Audit Senior Manager Harrisburg, PA 17101 Aramark Kelly Banaszak 267-671-4469 1101 Market St [email protected] Director of Communications 609-760-3332 (c) Philadelphia, PA 19107 Exelon Corporation Anne Bancroft 10 S. Dearborn St [email protected] 610-812-5454 (c) Associate General Counsel Chicago, IL 60603 Aramark Jennifer Bloom 215-238-8143 1101 Market St [email protected] Finance Director 215-779-1025 (c) Philadelphia, PA 19107 Geisinger Hannah Bobrowski 570-271-5417 100 North Academy Ave, MC 28-10 [email protected] Associate Vice President, Achieving Excellence 570-926-3071 (c) Danville, PA 17822 Independence Blue Cross Roslyn Boskett 1900 Market St, 7th Floor [email protected] 856-986-9814 (c) Director, Contact Center Philadelphia, PA 19103 KPMG, LLP Kelli Brown 1601 Market Street [email protected] 610-256-0628 (c) Senior Manager Audit Philadelphia, PA 07677
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Annual Report
    ARAMARK 2002 ANNUAL REPORT ARAMARK CORPORATION ARAMARK TOWER 1101 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 U.S.A. www.ARAMARK.com 2002 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 2 Letter To Shareholders 6 ARAMARK At A Glance 8 Partnership Profiles 20 Community Service 21 Financial Review 61 Shareholder Information 62 Officers And Presidents Council 63 Board Of Directors BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2000 %* 2001 %* 2002 %* OPERATING RESULTS Sales $7,262,867 8% $7,788,690 7% $8,769,841 13% Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes 419,583 12% 439,507 5% 560,267 27% Net Income 167,960 12% 176,496 5% 269,912 53% FINANCIAL POSITION Total Assets $3,199,383 11% $3,216,394 1% $4,259,302 32% Long-term Debt 1,777,660 10% 1,635,867 -8% 1,835,713 12% NET INCOME PER SHARE Basic $0.94 18% $1.03 10% $1.42 38% (Seated, left to right) Leonard Coleman, James Preston, Karl von der Heyden. (Standing, left to right) Ronald Davenport, James Ksansnak, Joseph Neubauer, Robert Callander, Thomas Kean, Lawrence Babbio, Patricia Barron. Diluted 0.88 19% 0.97 10% 1.34 38% * change over prior year JOSEPH NEUBAUER2,3 RONALD R. DAVENPORT 1,4,5 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, ARAMARK Sheridan Broadcasting Corporation LAWRENCE T. BABBIO, JR.2,3,4 THOMAS H. KEAN3,4 Vice Chairman and President, President, Drew University Verizon Communications, Inc. Former Governor of New Jersey PATRICIA C. BARRON1 JAMES E. KSANSNAK3 Professor, Leonard N. Stern School Retired Vice Chairman, of Business, New York University ARAMARK ROBERT J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Food Industry Scorecard
    THE FOOD INDUSTRY SCORECARD An evaluation of food companies’ progress making—and keeping— animal welfare promises humanesociety.org/scorecard Executive summary Most of the largest U.S. food companies have publicly pledged to eliminate certain animal abuses from their supply chains. But as countless consumers have asked: are they keeping their promises? For context, the vast majority of animals in our food system live Here’s the good news: that kind of radical view is out of in dismal conditions. Mother pigs are locked in gestation crates step with traditional American values. Agribusiness may see ani- so small they can’t turn around. Egg-laying hens are crammed mals as mere machines, but consumers don’t. into cages so tightly they can’t even spread their wings. And chickens in the poultry industry are bred to grow so large, so ɠ As the American Farm Bureau reports, nearly all consumers (95%) believe farm animals should be fast they suffer from agonizing leg disorders. treated well. It wasn’t always this way. Throughout history, animals hav- en’t been forced to endure such miserable lives. (And today, ɠ The Food Marketing Institute found that animal welfare is shoppers’ second most important social issue. there are certainly farmers who don’t use these abusive prac- tices.) But as agri-culture developed into agri-business, the ɠ The food industry analytics firm Technomic concluded industry’s relationship to animals became more severe. that for American restaurant patrons, concerns about animal cruelty outweigh those regarding the “Forget the pig is an animal,” urged Hog Farm Management environment, fair trade, local sourcing and other issues.
    [Show full text]
  • It Is Undisputed That ARAMARK, Inc. (“ARAMARK”) Acquired Servicemaster and Assumed Its Contractual Obligations with Greyhound
    Case 2:06-cv-03049-LDD Document 39 Filed 01/16/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SELWYN NIEVES : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 06-3049 : GREYHOUND LINES, INC., et al. : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kauffman, J. January 16, 2009 Now before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) of Defendant Servicemaster, TBS Division (“Servicemaster”). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND This action arises from a workplace injury sustained by Plaintiff Selwyn M. Nieves (“Plaintiff”) on July 4, 2004. As alleged in the Complaint, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Mount Corporation (“Mount”) was, at all times relevant to this action, the owner of a maintenance facility (the “Greyhound Maintenance Center”) located at 710 N. Delaware Avenue in Philadelphia. Compl. ¶ 3. Pursuant to a written service agreement (the “Agreement”) with Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”), Servicemaster was responsible for maintaining the premises of the Greyhound Maintenance Center. Id. ¶ 4.1 1 It is undisputed that ARAMARK, Inc. (“ARAMARK”) acquired Servicemaster and assumed its contractual obligations with Greyhound. However, Plaintiff contends that ARAMARK did not assume Servicemaster’s contractual obligations until after the accident at issue in this case. -1- Case 2:06-cv-03049-LDD Document 39 Filed 01/16/09 Page 2 of 7 Plaintiff alleges that on July 4, 2004, “there existed a dangerous condition on certain concrete steps situated in the Greyhound Maintenance Center, to wit, a slippery substance which was allowed and permitted . to be on the steps with no warnings, barricades or similar precautions.” Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Date: July 1, 2019 Mission Fast Facts the Mission of St
    ST. JOSEPH’S PREPARATORY SCHOOL PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA PRINCIPAL START DATE: JULY 1, 2019 WWW.SJPREP.ORG Mission Fast Facts The mission of St. Joseph’s Prep — as a • Year established: 1851 Catholic, Jesuit, urban, college preparatory • Total enrollment: 902 school — is to develop the minds, hearts, • Student/teacher ratio: 13:1 souls and characters of young men in their • Total faculty: 71 pursuit of becoming men for and with others. • Faculty with advanced degrees: 97% • Average faculty tenure: 17 years • Students receiving financial aid: 56% Motto of the Society of Jesus Ad maiorem Dei gloriam – “For the greater glory of God” OVERVIEW Founded in 1851 by the Society of Jesus, St. Joseph’s Preparatory School (the Prep) is an independent, Catholic, college-preparatory school for boys. Located in North Philadelphia, it is the only Jesuit high school in the Delaware Valley and one of 62 Jesuit Secondary Schools in the United States. The school serves approximately 900 students and is dedicated to providing a robust educational experience to its students while balancing its highly-regarded classical program with extensive offerings of athletics, theater, music, and club opportunities. Even more important is the school’s commitment to produce graduates who are “men for and with others” and who will serve their families, churches, and communities. A sense of pride, enthusiasm, and “Brotherhood” permeates the campus at all levels. Students, parents, alumni, faculty, and administration fully embrace the Ignatian mission. The school is devoted to maintaining its commitment to diversity, service, and academic excellence. Enrollment is strong and steady, the Board is visionary and supportive, the faculty is talented and dedicated, there is a formidable strategic plan in place, and the reputation of the school is stellar.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOLUTION Encouraging Amazon to Choose the City of Philadelphia
    RESOLUTION Encouraging Amazon to choose the City of Philadelphia as the future home of HQ2. WHEREAS On Thursday, September 7, 2017, Amazon announced that it is seeking to open a second company headquarters in North America (“Amazon HQ2”), and will conduct a comprehensive search to decide on the location; and WHEREAS, the HQ2 campus will require up to 8 million square feet of new space, may entail more than $5 billion to build, and employ up to 50,000 new full-time employees in the years following commencement of operations; and WHEREAS, Amazon issued a Request for Proposals for HQ2 highlighting specific requirements for an ideal site, including a metropolitan area of at least 1 million people; greenfield or infill space available to meet Amazon’s space needs in multiple phases; access to mass transit on site; close proximity to a major international airport; and a location able to attract and retain strong technical talent; and WHEREAS, Philadelphia’s commercial and non-commercial real estate is more affordable than other cities in the U.S. comparable in size and density, and its cost of living is 20 percent less than other major metropolitan areas; and WHEREAS, Philadelphia has the fastest millennial growth rate of any of the nation’s 10 largest cities with nearly 40 percent of 25-34 year olds holding a bachelor's degrees or higher, compared with the national average of 33 percent; and WHEREAS, With 102 colleges and universities, the Greater Philadelphia region offers a diverse pool of highly-skilled, experienced experts, and young professionals, with 90,000 graduates each year; and WHEREAS, Philadelphia is an international gateway, perfectly situated for business operations along the northeast corridor between Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Brochure
    schuylkillyards.com BY BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST The Vision Schuylkill Yards transforms 14 acres adjacent to Philadelphia’s 30th Street Station, replacing parking lots with a vibrant 6.9 million SF neighborhood of parks, lifestyle experiences, and workspaces intentionally designed for productivity and wellbeing. Building upon our country’s historic values of invention, equity, entrepreneurship and courage, Schuylkill Yards introduces the next chapter for Philadelphia. Here, we are connecting people and communities, uniting bold brands with driven, entrepreneurial minded talent. Our vision is executed by the world’s best architects, engineers, planners and designers, and guided by an intentional, inclusive approach. Now, a new place is rising between Center City and University City—inspiring us to continue building the powerful legacy of Philadelphia. SF of4.8M Work Spaces SF of1.9M Living Spaces SF of Retail132K Experiences 6.5of Greenspace Acres The NEW HEART of America’s First Great City Your New Neighbors Our Neighborhood is Brilliant This is where talent flocks to and people set down roots after graduation. Anchored by several of the nation’s most acclaimed educational and medical institutions, University City continues to thrive as the center for innovation and opportunities. largest 4thpopulation of students in the U.S. with 440,000 students College54% Students Stay in Area after Talent Thrives Here Graduation It just got way easier to recruit the nation's top talent. Here, you are surrounded by Increase115% in College- the risk-takers, boundary-pushers, and educated 25-34 forward-thinkers. These people are driven by Year-olds, 2000-2017 passion and purpose, and they’re seeking like-minded companies and leaders who will push for advances in life sciences, technology and business.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Gift Companies
    Matching Gift Companies Company Subsidiary of For More Information Aetna, Inc. - Matching Grant - http://www.cybergrants.com/aetna/docs/matching_grant_guidelines.pdf Aetna Dental Care of Kentucky, Inc. Personal Donations AK Steel Holding Corporation AK Steel Holding Corporation http://www.vpr.net/vpr_files/employee_matching/ak_steel.pdf American Fidelity Assurance American Fidelity Assurance Please contact your HR representative Corporation Corporation Ameriprise Financial, Inc (for Ameriprise Financial, Inc (for http://www.joinameriprise.com/careers/about/community-relations/ Employees and Employee Advisors Employees and Employee Advisors (P1)) (P1)) http://forms.matchinggifts.com/Amylin2010.pdf Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Please contact your HR representative ARAMARK Corporation ARAMARK Corporation Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. of Kentucky, Please contact your HR representative Inc. AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. http://www.bankofamerica.com/foundation/index.cfm?template=fd_matchinggift Bank of America Corporation Bank of America Corporation http://www.cigna.com/aboutus/community-involvement CIGNA Dental Health of Kentucky, Inc CIGNA Corporation Please contact your HR representative Cornerstone Brand IAC Interactive Corp. CSX Corp. (Volunteer program) CSX Corp. (Volunteer program) http://www.beyondourrails.org/docs/volunteerism-program-organization- Dollars for Doers Dollars for Doers information.pdf Please contact your HR representative David J. Joseph Company, The David J. Joseph Company, The DJJ Railcar Leasing
    [Show full text]
  • Aramark Timeline
    Aramark Timeline 1930s In 1936, Davre Davidson begins selling peanuts out of his Dodge in Los Angeles as the first step to building what will eventually become ARAMARK. In 1939, Davre Davidson and his brother, Henry, become business partners through the formation of Davidson Brothers. The company flourishes under their joint management and eventually becomes the largest independent vending operator in the United States. 1940s In 1940, William Fishman, believing there was a promising future in vending, purchases 200 candy and cigarette machines and enters into the vending industry. 1950s In 1959, the Davidson brothers and William Fishman combine their companies to create ARA. 1960s In 1960, ARA makes its debut as a public company. By the end of the year, ARA revenues top $37 million with operations in 19 states. In 1967, ARA broadens its activity in Canada through an equity investment in Versafood Services, Ltd., Canada’s leading food service company at the time. In 1968, ARA serves its first Olympics at the Summer Games in Mexico City. That same year, the company acquires District News and enters the magazine and book publishing business. In 1969, ARA officially becomes ARA Services, to reflect its growing range of businesses. 1970s In 1972, ARA Services begins operating in England. In 1976, ARA Services enters the Japanese market through a joint venture with Mitsui & Co. Ltd. to form AIM Services. That same year, the company entered the work uniform rental and career apparel industry. In 1979, ARA Services’ total employment surpasses 100,000. 1980s In 1980, ARA Services acquires National Child Care Centers, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:14-Cv-05677-MAK Document 83 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 28
    Case 2:14-cv-05677-MAK Document 83 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERTS TECHNOLOGY GROUP, : CIVIL ACTION INC. : : v. : NO. 14-5677 : CURWOOD, INC. : OPINION KEARNEY, J. September 23, 2015 Pennsylvania contract law enforces supply agreements between a distributor and manufacturer based on definite terms. Distributors assume substantial risk electing to work with a manufacturer relying upon uncertain terms in an email exchange with no obligation to produce product for a defined period of time. Here, the Plaintiff distributor relied on the Defendant manufacturer’s email promise to “protect” Plaintiff’s new customers without defining how long the obligations last. We now address what happens when Plaintiff’s new customers decide to end relationships with Plaintiff and begin buying the same product from the Defendant manufacturer or its agents. Plaintiff, having decided to build a warehouse for its new business line based on its legal interpretations and internal sales formulas, now seeks damages from the Defendant manufacturer for servicing its “protected” customers under contract theories and duplicative tort claims. Plaintiff cannot obtain contract damages for losses beyond the parties’ termination of their agreement. The parties, however, have not shown when their agreement ended and we find genuine issues of material fact whether Defendant breached its promise to “protect” Plaintiff’s accounts before termination when it entered into a separate agreement to supply the product line directly to the customers after it decided to stop doing business with Plaintiff. In the accompanying Order, we grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Case 2:14-cv-05677-MAK Document 83 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 28 all claims except for damages arising from a breach of contract as we find genuine issues of material fact as to whether Defendant failed to “protect” Plaintiff’s relationship with its customers before their agreement terminated at some disputed unknown date.
    [Show full text]