Strategic Development Directions Consultation Document (SDD Consultation Document) That Was
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pick up Points
Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Abercynon Ampthill Bakewell Aberdare Andover Baldock Aberdeen Annan Baldock Services (A1(M)) Aberdeen (ABZ) Annandale Water Services Banbury (A74(M)) Abergavenny Bangor Arbroath Abergele Banstead Armthorpe Abingdon Bargoed Arnold Abington Services (M74) Barking Arundel Accrington Barnet Ashbourne Acle Barnetby Top Services Ashburton (M180) Adlington Ashby-de-la-Zouch Barnoldswick Alcester Ashford Barnsley Alcester Oversley Mill Services (A46) Ashington Barnstaple Aldershot Ashton-in-Makerfield Barrow-in-Furness Aldridge Ashton-under-Lyne Barry Alfreton Aspatria Barton-le-Clay Alnwick Astley Barton-upon-Humber Alsager Atherstone Basildon Alton Atherton Basingstoke Altrincham Attleborough Bath Amble Audenshaw Batley Ambleside Axminster Battle Amersham Aylesbury Bawtry Amesbury Countess Ayr Beaconsfield Services (A303) Bembridge Beaconsfield Services Amesbury Solstice Park (M40) Britannia Grand Burstin Services (A303) Bebington Britannia Grand Ammanford Pont Abraham Scarborough Beccles Services (M4) Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Beckenham Birmingham Bourne Bedford Birmingham (BHX) Bournemouth Bedlington Birtley Bournemouth (BOH) Bedworth Bishop Auckland Brackley Beeston Bishop's Cleeve Bracknell Belfast (BFS) Bishop's Stortford Bradford Belper Bradford-on-Avon Birchanger Green -
Impact Assessment
Number of Number of Alcohol refreshment off-trade Number of additional Location Name of MSA Served venues premises retailers 1 A1 (M) Baldock Services No 4 1 2 2 M40 Beaconsfield Services No 4 1 1 3 M62 Birch Services No 3 1 3 4 M11 Birchanger Green Services No 4 1 1 5 M65 Blackburn with Darwen Services No 2 1 6 A1(M) Blyth Services No 3 1 7 M5 Bridgwater Services No 3 1 8 M6 Burton-in-Kendal Services No 3 1 9 M62 Burtonwood Services No 3 1 10 A14/M11 Cambridge Services No 4 1 1 11 M4 Cardiff Gate Services Yes 2 1 1 12 M4 Cardiff West Services No 3 1 13 M6 Charnock Richard Services Yes 5 1 14 M40 Cherwell Valley Services No 4 1 1 15 M56 Chester Services No 3 1 16 M4 Chieveley Services No 3 1 1 17 M25 Clacket Lane Services No 3 1 18 M6 Corley Services No 5 19 M5 Cullompton Services No 2 1 20 M18 Doncaster North Services No 3 1 21 M1 Donington Park Services No 3 1 22 A1 (M) Durham Services No 3 1 23 M5 Exeter Services Yes 2 1 1 24 A1/M62 Ferrybridge Services No 3 1 1 25 M3 Fleet Services No 6 1 1 26 M5 Frankley Services No 3 1 1 27 M5 Gordano Services No 4 1 1 28 M62 Hartshead Moor Services No 5 1 29 M4 Heston Eastbound No 3 1 30 M4 Heston Westbound No 4 1 31 M6 Hilton Park Services No 4 1 1 32 M42 Hopwood Park Services No 4 1 1 33 M6 J38 Truckstop Yes 1 1 34 M6 Keele Services No 5 1 35 M6 Killington Lake Services No 3 1 36 M6 Knutsford Services No 4 1 1 37 M6 Lancaster (Forton) Services No 3 1 2 38 M1 Leicester (Markfield) Services No 1 39 M1 Leicester Forest East Services No 4 40 M4 Leigh Delamere Services No 6 1 4 41 M1 London Gateway -
Construction Impacts on Motorway Interchanges
HIGH SPEED UK : CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON MOTORWAY INTERCHANGES Introduction Massive road traffic disruption and associated major construction difficulties at motorway interchanges have always been cited as one of the key arguments against any proposed high speed rail route aligned along the M1 corridor. Whilst no study has ever been published to substantiate this claim, it has gained general acceptance as a primary reason for rejecting the M1 corridor in favour of the selected route for HS2 through the Chilterns. Development of detailed horizontal and vertical alignment designs for the M1-aligned High Speed UK proposals now allows the assertion of insuperable difficulties at interchanges to be rigorously tested. This paper reviews the proposed HSUK alignments at all of the 21 M1 interchanges and 5 service areas between London and Lutterworth, to determine the nature and extent of the asserted difficulties. Information Considered 1:25,000 scale plans have been developed to cover the full extent (circa 1,000km ) of proposed HSUK new build route, from London to Liverpool and Glasgow. This has allowed both horizontal and vertical alignments to be designed for the proposed high speed line. Extracts from this mapping are presented below, in the case studies relating to each interchange. Technical Challenges presented at Motorway Interchanges The M1 was constructed along the primary national transport corridor, followed by Romans (Watling Street), canal builders (Grand Union Canal) and railway builders (London & Birmingham Railway, now West Coast Main Line) alike. In terms of the topography encountered en route, it is by far the most favourable route between London and the Midlands (this contrasts sharply with the Chiltern-aligned M40, constructed in much more difficult terrain). -
HAVERSHAM Cum LITTLE LINFORD PARISH COUNCIL
HAVERSHAM cum LITTLE LINFORD PARISH COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE HAVERSHAM CUM LITTLE LINFORD PARISH COUNCIL held at Haversham Social and Community Centre on Monday 18th September 2017 at 7.30pm PRESENT- Cllrs N Watson (in the Chair), I Burgess, C Langham, P Furniss, B Clift, P Williams and E Neal; 11 members of the public including Patrick Upton, Harvey Gilbert, Lesley Gilbert, Jackie Brown, Pat Brightman and David Stabler from Great Linford Parish Council. Clerk J Vischer. 1. APOLOGIES Ward Cllr A Geary. These were accepted. 2. PUBLIC FORUM 2.1. Lesley Gilbert reiterated a complaint concerning traffic speeds on entering the Lower village from Little Linford. She had noted that no ‘30’ speed roundel was marked on the road surface for traffic descending the hill from the ‘40’ to the ‘30’ limit where there are several such reminders to drivers at other points on this road. The Clerk expressed doubt that Milton Keynes Council (MKC) Highways would respond to such a request but it was agreed he should make enquiries into the possibility of the Parish Council paying for it. CLK 2.2. Mr Upton reported back on a meeting held between concerned residents and Ward Councillor Andrew Geary at Great Linford Parish Council offices regarding the Keswani/Portfields and Linford Lakes planning applications (17/02105/OUT & 17/01937/OUTEIS below). Concerns revolved around the possible success of a planning appeal by the developers on the basis of the validity of the MKC Five-Year Land Supply. It was agreed to append these notes of the meeting to the minutes. -
VP 2.Looking North from Lower End Rd - National Cycle Route No.51 and Milton Keynes Boundary Walk Near Eagle Farm at Wavendon
A3 A B C D E F G H I Field of view: 72 degrees Grid reference: SP 95028 38094 Viewpoint elevation: 70m AOD ! Viewer height: 1.6m ° M1 vehicles and taller infrastructure such as signage visible between Viewing distance @ A3: 300mm Hayfield Farm and above intervening vegetation Distance from M1: 250m 1 1 2 2 VP 1. Looking west from Salford Rd near PRoW FP10 at Brogborough. 3 3 Field of view: 76 degrees Grid reference: SP 92910 37990 Viewpoint elevation: 70m AOD Viewer height: 1.6m Viewing distance @ A3: 300mm Distance from M1: 1km John Lewis Fox Covert M1 vehicles and taller infrastructure such as signage visible distribution centre between and above intervening vegetation A421 4 4 5 5 VP 2.Looking north from Lower End Rd - National Cycle Route No.51 and Milton Keynes Boundary Walk near Eagle Farm at Wavendon. Service Layer Credits: Legend: Client Scale at A3 NTS P02 124-02-175-12-16 NM BO CS 1:250,000 Role Rev Date By Chkd Appd Specialist Designer - Environment Metres Project Title Suitability 0 3,150 6,300 12,600 Smart Motorways Programme M1 S2 J13 - J16 Job No Rev Drawing Title 248769-00 P02 Viewpoints Photographs Name www.amey.co.uk Sheet 1 o off 13 www.arup.com HA549348-AMAR-ELS-SWI-DR-YE-000006HA------ MXD Location: J:\248000\248769-00\4 Internal Project Data\4-03 Drawings\1_GIS\Workspaces_ESR\Template\SMP_J13-J16_ESR_Map00_Template_20161214.mxd © Arup Do not scale A3 A B C D E F G H I Field of view: 41 degrees Grid reference: SP 93175 38460 John Lewis Viewpoint elevation: 70m AOD distribution centre Broughton °! Viewer height: 1.6m Viewing distance @ A3: 300mm Distance from M1: 0m 1 1 Fox Covert 2 2 VP 3. -
Smart Motorways Programme M1 Junction 13 to 16 Smart Motorway
Smart Motorways Programme M1 Junction 13 to 16 Smart Motorway Statutory Instrument Consultation Document The introduction of variable mandatory speed limits Summary of the consultation Topic of this consultation The implementation of variable mandatory speed limits (VMSL) on the M1 junctions 13 to 16 smart motorway scheme (the Scheme). Scope of this consultation We are keen to have your comments on the proposal for implementation of VMSL for the Scheme, which comprises all-lane running (ALR) from junctions 13 to 16. We specifically would like to hear how the proposal could affect you, your organisation or those you represent. It is important to note that this is not a consultation on the actual policy of using VMSL. Use of this traffic management feature is already established government policy. We are therefore seeking your views on the implementation of VMSL as set out within this document. Geographical scope The proposed smart motorway will enable proactive management of the M1 carriageway, including slip roads and motorway to motorway intersections between junctions 13 and 16. It will mean consistent coverage of VMSL from junction 10 to junction 19. General Information To The consultation is aimed at any affected stakeholder groups or individuals. Body/bodies responsible Highways England for the consultation Duration The consultation will last for a period of four weeks commencing on 26 March 2018. The consultation will close on 23 April 2018. Please ensure responses arrive no later than the closing date. Enquiries Debraj De Project Manager Highways England 5 St. Phillips Place Birmingham B3 2PW [email protected] How to respond Please respond to the consultation through our online survey. -
HS2 : High Speed Trains, Slow Speed Brains What the Government’S Experts at HS2 Ltd Were Told – but Failed to Understand
HS2 : High Speed Trains, Slow Speed Brains What the Government’s Experts at HS2 Ltd were told – but failed to understand 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 7 2. Rationale of Study 10 3. Overview of HS2 Process 19 4. Key Flaws in HS2 Process 25 5. High Speed North/High Speed UK Submissions in Summary 31 6. Prologue : Initial Engagement with HS2 Ltd 38 7. Consultation on HS2 Phase 1 Proposals 40 8. Consultation on HS2 Phase 1 Draft Environmental Statement 50 9. ‘Call For Proposals’ from the Government Airports Commission 55 10. Consultation on HS2 Phase 2 Proposals 59 11. House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee Inquiry 69 12. House of Commons PACAC Inquiry 80 13. ‘Heywood Review’ into HS2’s Rising Costs 80 14. Letter to Andrew Jones MP, HS2 Minister 82 15. Conclusions 83 Appendix A : HSUK commentary on HS2 remit 85 Appendix B : HSUK commentary on HS2 option selection procedure 90 Appendix C : HSUK commentary on HS2 official consultations 95 Appendix D : Prologue : Initial Engagement with HS2 Ltd 99 Appendix E : HSUK response to HS2 Phase 1 consultation 106 1 Appendix F : HSUK response to HS2 Draft Environmental Statement 143 Appendix G : HSUK submission to Government Airports Commission 151 Appendix H : HSUK response to HS2 Phase 2 consultation 162 Appendix I : HSUK submission to House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs Inquiry into the Economic Case for HS2 179 Appendix J : Extracts from Select Committee Report HoL134 and Government Response Cm9078 188 Appendix K : HSUK report on construction impacts at motorway interchanges 193 Appendix L : HSUK response to Inquiry by Public Administration & Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) Inquiry into HS2 community engagement 205 Appendix M : HSUK letter to Sir Jeremy Heywood in connection with ‘Heywood Review’ 222 Appendix N : HSUK letter to Andrew Jones MP, Junior Transport Minister responsible for HS2 227 HS2 – High Speed Trains, Slow Speed Brains All text and diagrams © 2017 to Colin Elliff (CSE) / Network 2020 mapping. -
Cargo Crime – March 2021
IMPORTANT NOTICE Due to circumstances beyond our control, this will be the last free NaVCIS Freight bulletin. Following this they will only be available on payment of a membership fee*. Please see the final slide for more details * Law enforcement are exempt and will continue to receive them for free* 1 d Cargo Crime Update March 2021 This document is intended to inform UK law enforcement and trusted industry partners. This document should not be shared outside of this audience without permission from NaVCIS Freight. THANK YOU The work undertaken by NaVCIS Freight would not be possible without the assistance & funding from our financial partners. Data Limitations Freight crime does not have a unique Home Office Crime Recording code. Police forces invariably record freight and cargo crime as a general theft offence, or theft from motor vehicle. As a result, there are inherent difficulties when attempting to harvest specific freight or cargo crime data. NaVCIS Freight is the only police unit in the UK to attempt to collate and maintain a recording system to capture freight and cargo crime offences. This is done on a national scale. To achieve this, NaVCIS request cargo crime notifications from a number of sources, namely UK police forces, hauliers, cargo insurers and cargo surveyors, along with industry trade organisations such as the Road Haulage Association, and the British International Freight Association. It must be noted that whilst cargo crime data is received regularly from the majority of UK police forces on either a weekly, monthly, or quarterly basis, the regularity and completeness of this data can vary greatly. -
Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report
Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 14 September 2010 Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Report Draft Newport Pagnell © Mike Farley Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 1 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 4 I DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Project Background and Purpose ............................................................................................ 9 1.2 Aims ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Setting ............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Location, Topography & Geology .......................................................................................... 11 2.2 Wider Landscape ................................................................................................................... 14 3 Brief History of Settlement............................................................................................................ 17 4 Evidence......................................................................................................................................... -
Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – April/ May/ June 2020
Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – April/ May/ June 2020 Q2 2020 Author: NaVCIS Intelligence Analyst Contributor: NaVCIS Intelligence Researcher Date/version: 20th August 2020/v.1 Classification: OFFICIAL Handling instructions: This document is intended to inform NaVCIS’ strategic governance structures and Freight industry partners. This document should not be shared outside of this audience without prior permission of the author. OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – April/ May/ June 2020 Introduction Partners NaVCIS receive cargo crime notifications from a number of sources The work undertaken by NaVCIS Freight Crime would not be possible namely Police, Industry, Hauliers, Insurers, Cargo Surveyors, Trade without the assistance & funding from our financial partners. Organisations, the Road Haulage Association, and the British International Freight Association. Reported cargo crime data is received regularly from 34 UK police forces. The remaining forces provide data on a quarterly basis. Aims and Objectives The aim of this report is to analyse the cargo crime data in relation to all cargo crime notifications received for the period April, May and June 2020 (Q2), in order to provide an overview and assessment of the scale and nature of thefts nationally. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] Creating value from data 2 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – April/ May/ June 2020 Key Findings Recommendations • There were 783 Cargo crime notifications during Q2. • Discover what security measures are currently in place • The total loss in Q2 was £16,020,723.94. at the most vulnerable MSA’s and look at ways to • 70% of notifications were Theft From Motor Vehicle increase them if appropriate. -
Cafe and Truck Stops.Xml
Name Position Link A1 Truckstop, 01476 860916, 6am-10pm N52 48.221 W0 36.558 A35 Caf 01305 269199, Mo-Fr 630am-7pm Sa 630am-7pm Su 745am-6pm N50 42.880 W2 26.564 A6 Cafe N54 13.384 W2 46.372 Abington Services, 01864 502637, Mo-Su 24hr N55 30.313 W3 41.678 Ace Cafe N51 32.475 W0 16.665 http://www.ace-cafe-london.com Adderstone Services, 01668 213440, Mo-Su 24hr N55 33.881 W1 47.513 Albion Inn 01458 210281 Mo-Th 7am-8pm Fr-Sa 7am-3pm Su 10am-3pm N51 07.889 W2 49.499 Alton Railway Station Cafe N51 09.130 W0 58.034 Anglia Motel, 01406 422766, Mo-Su 7am-9pm N52 48.436 E0 03.488 Annandale Water Services, 01576 470870, Mo-Su 24hr N55 12.952 W3 24.926 Ashford International, 01233 502919, Mo-Su 24hr N51 07.253 E0 54.166 Ashgrove, 01466 760223, Mo-Fr 7am-630pm Sa 8am-5pm Su 9am-5pm N57 29.056 W2 51.383 Avon Forest 01425 471641 Mo-Th 8am-8pm Fr-Sa 8am-6pm Su 9am-5pm N50 49.533 W1 49.850 Avon Lodge, 01179 827706, Mo 6am-11pm Tu-Fr 630am-1130pm N51 30.316 W2 41.404 Baldock Services, 01462 832810, Mo-Su 24hr N52 00.865 W0 12.068 Ballachulish Tourist Info Cafe N56 40.717 W5 07.856 Barbaras Tearooms, Pateley Bridge N54 05.037 W1 45.769 Barton Park Services, 01325 377777, Mo-Su 24hr N54 28.025 W1 39.728 BCT Cafe N53 50.167 W1 47.379 http://www.bfmmotorcycles.co.uk/ Beach Cafe nr Kippford N54 52.777 W3 43.825 Ben Nevis Inn N56 49.185 W5 04.696 Bernies Cafe N54 09.259 W2 28.039 http://www.berniescafe.co.uk/catalog/ Billy Jeans 01352 781118 Mo-Fr 730am-3pm Sa 730am-12pm N53 14.828 W3 11.350 Birch Lea, 01522 869293, Mo-Fr 7am-3pm Sa 8am-2pm N53 09.140 W0 40.853 -
A U Tu MN 2007 Issu E
TOPIC: MILTON KEYNES 104 AT 40 E U SS FRANCIS TIBBALDS AWARD PROJECTS SHORTLIST: 2007 I HOLT TOWN MN GRAHAME PARK U T U A PRICE £5.00 ISSN 1750 712X UDG UPDATE Ben van Bruggen, the UDG’s Chair reflects on its role 30 years on As Milton Keynes is forty years of age, voice for urban design in this country, ways of being professional in urban we are able to view it with a degree of for professionalism in urban design design. objectivity. The Urban Design Group and for raising standards. Our current I’m not sure what the UDG will is approaching a more youthful thirty Executive – a mix of enthusiastic look like in ten years’ time when it too years, and while it may not be the time educators, architects, urban designers, hits forty, but I believe that it will still to settle down just yet, we can think of town planners, both retired and be growing and prospering, enticing ourselves as grown-up and mature. It practising – and the broad range of a younger generation to participate seems legitimate to ask too whether the interests that make up the membership through its membership, and promoting UDG is still as relevant today as it was are well equipped to provide this. debate about good urban design and thirty years ago. Do we still need it? One outcome of the recent Executive quality of life - much like Milton Keynes. My view is yes. Simply put, if the Awayday was not that we need to invent UDG did not exist today we would want a new profession (a new town, if you Ben van Bruggen to invent it.