DOCSLIB.ORG

Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 14 September 2010 Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Report Draft Newport Pagnell © Mike Farley Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 1 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 4 I DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Project Background and Purpose ............................................................................................ 9 1.2 Aims ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Setting ............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Location, Topography & Geology .......................................................................................... 11 2.2 Wider Landscape ................................................................................................................... 14 3 Brief History of Settlement............................................................................................................ 17 4 Evidence.......................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Historic Maps.......................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Documentary Evidence .......................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Built Heritage.......................................................................................................................... 22 4.4 Archaeological Evidence........................................................................................................ 26 4.5 Environmental Evidence ........................................................................................................ 40 5 Archaeological & Historical Development................................................................................... 41 5.1 Prehistoric period (c.10,000 BC – AD 43).............................................................................. 41 5.2 Roman synthesis and components (AD 43 – 410) ................................................................ 43 5.3 Anglo Saxon synthesis and components (AD 410 – 1066) ................................................... 45 5.4 Medieval synthesis and components (1066-1536) ................................................................ 50 5.5 Post medieval synthesis and components (1536-1800) ........................................................ 58 5.6 Modern synthesis and components (1800-Present) .............................................................. 63 6 Historic Urban Zones..................................................................................................................... 73 6.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 73 6.2 Historic Urban Zones ............................................................................................................. 73 6.3 Archaeological Assessment................................................................................................... 73 6.4 Period:.................................................................................................................................... 74 6.5 Survival:.................................................................................................................................. 75 6.6 Potential: ................................................................................................................................ 75 6.7 Group Value: .......................................................................................................................... 75 6.8 Diversity:................................................................................................................................. 75 6.9 Historic Settlement ................................................................................................................. 77 6.10 Modern Settlement................................................................................................................. 85 II ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................. 89 7 Summary and Potential ................................................................................................................. 89 7.1 Conservation Areas (CA) ....................................................................................................... 91 7.2 Scheduled Ancient Monuments (SAMs) ................................................................................ 91 7.3 Historic Character .................................................................................................................. 91 7.4 Archaeological Potential......................................................................................................... 91 III RESEARCH AGENDA.................................................................................................................92 8 Research Agenda ........................................................................................................................... 92 9 References ...................................................................................................................................... 94 9.1 Map Sources .......................................................................................................................... 94 9.2 Trade Directories.................................................................................................................... 94 9.3 Bibliography............................................................................................................................ 94 9.4 Websites................................................................................................................................. 98 10 Addresses ................................................................................................................................... 98 11 Appendix 1: Chronology & Glossary of Terms ..................................................................... 100 11.1 Chronology (taken from Unlocking Buckinghamshire’s Past Website)................................ 100 11.2 Glossary of Terms................................................................................................................ 100 12 Appendix 2: HER Records ....................................................................................................... 102 12.1 Monuments HER Report...................................................................................................... 102 12.2 Landscapes HER Reports.................................................................................................... 106 12.3 Find Spots ............................................................................................................................ 106 12.4 Listed Buildings .................................................................................................................... 109 13 Appendix 3: Trade Listings and Population Data ................................................................. 113 14 Appendix 4: Historical Consultancy Report .......................................................................... 115 2 Newport Pagnell Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 1 List of Illustrations Figure 1: Urban Character Zones for Newport Pagnell.............................................................................6 Figure 2: Newport Pagnell in location...................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3: Geology of town (BGS) ............................................................................................................ 12 Figure 4: Diagram of Connections from Newport Pagnell (representational only).................................. 13 Figure 5: Town in the wider historic landscape using routes and Bucks HLC ........................................ 15 Figure 6: Settlement around Newport Pagnell ........................................................................................ 16 Figure 7: Graph showing population changes in Newport Pagnell (excluding 1941, 1981 & 1991)....... 18 Figure 8: Town in the 1880s to 1920s ..................................................................................................... 19 Figure 9: The town in the post war to modern period.............................................................................. 20 Figure 10: 1644 plan of Newport Pagnell by C. Vandenboome.............................................................. 21 Figure 11: Listed Buildings in Newport Pagnell by century ..................................................................... 22 Figure 12: Historic maps from Clockwise: Thomas Jefferys’s Map depicting Newport
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Admissions Arrangements Policy
    ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS For Year 7 entry in September 2021 & In-year admissions from September 2020 (Sections A-C) 1 ADMISSIONS ARRANGEMENTS FOR OUSEDALE SCHOOL A. BACKGROUND The ethos of Ousedale School is expressed in its mission statement: in which it strives to provide: Students with the knowledge, confidence and skills to contribute and compete successfully locally, nationally and globally because they were educated at Ousedale School. Our school motto is for the school community to Aspire, Believe, Achieve: Aspire: Students, supported by staff and parents, are motivated to aim high in everything they do. They are encouraged to aspire to new heights: academically, practically and through the acquisition of new skills. Core values are promoted and opportunities provided for staff and students to demonstrate these on a daily basis. Believe: Students, with staff, develop resilience and self-belief in their ability to reach challenging targets and develop new skills. Achieve: Students achieve outstanding results and take responsibility for their learning enabling them to progress onto pathways of their choice and participate fully in the life of the school. We ask all parents/carers applying for a place to respect this ethos and its importance to the school community. 2 B. AREA SERVED BY OUSEDALE SCHOOL – THE DEFINED AREA The school serves the two most northern towns in Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell and Olney. Students in years 7 to 11 will attend one of the campuses (later referred to as the ‘designated campus’) of Ousedale School as follows; students living outside the defined area are considered for the campus they live closest to: Newport Pagnell Campus for children living in: Astwood, Chicheley, Gayhurst, Hardmead, Lathbury, Little Linford, Moulsoe, Newport Pagnell, North Crawley, Sherington and Stoke Goldington.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Snapshot As of 23Rd June 2021 (Data Reported up to 20Th June 2021)
    COVID-19 Snapshot As of 23rd June 2021 (data reported up to 20th June 2021) Population 269,457 Total individuals Total COVID-19 Percentage of Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated tested cases individuals that tested with 1st dose with 2nd dose positive (positivity) by 13-Jun by 13-Jun 170,587 20,878 12.2% 162,269 105,018 63.3% of population 66.4% of 16+ population 43.0% of 16+ population Number of Covid-19 cases PCR test Positivity Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated PCR tests in in the in the with 1st dose with 2nd dose the last 7 days last 7 days last 7 days in the last 7 days in the last 7 days 8,219 188 2.3% 7,947 8,048 direction of travel +990 direction of travel +14 direction of travel -0.1% direction of travel +2,267 direction of travel -3,007 direction of travel Direction of travel compares current snapshot against previous snapshot key: Increasing l no change decreasing Number of COVID-19 cases and All cases by Last 7 days by deaths by week age and gender age and gender 3,000 CASES DEATHS 100 FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE 2,700 2,400 90+ 90+ 75 2,100 80 to 89 80 to 89 1,800 70 to 79 70 to 79 1,500 50 60 to 69 60 to 69 1,200 50 to 59 50 to 59 Positive cases 900 40 to 49 40 to 49 25 Registered deaths 600 30 to 39 30 to 39 300 20 to 29 20 to 29 0 0 10 to 19 10 to 19 0 to 9 0 to 9 2,640 0 2,640 40 20 0 20 40 11 Oct 25 Oct 11 Apr 25 Apr 20 Jun 03 Jan 17 Jan 31 Jan 06 Jun 14 Mar 28 Mar 14 Feb 28 Feb 08 Nov 22 Nov 30 Aug 13 Sep 27 Sep 06 Dec 20 Dec 09 May 23 May Week ending only age groups with more than two cases will be shown Most
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKING Hal\T!SHIRE. FAR 259
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] BUCKING HAl\t!SHIRE. FAR 259 Tack Thomas, The Firs, Steeple Clay- TownsendJohnEmberton,Newprt. Pagnll Webb Joseph, Mount Pleasant, ~fiddle don, Winslow Townsend J. W. Gayhurst, :Newprt. Pgnll Craydon, Steeple Claydon S.O Talbot William, The Hyde, Olney S.O Treadwell J. Winchendon Up. Aylesbury Webster Samuel, North Crawley, New- Tanner Henry, Twyford, Buckingham Treadwell Samuel, Windmill hill, Wad- port Pagnell Tapping Henry, Wendover dean, Wen- desdon, Aylesbury WeedonThomasBrown,NewHousefarm, dover, Tring Treadwell Tom, Stowe, Buckingham Chalfont St. Giles,Gerrard's Cross R.S.O TappingJ. H. Weston Turville, Aylesbury Treadwell J. jun. Tingewick, Buckingham Welch George, Gold hill, Chalfont St. Tapping John Henry, Manor farm, Stoke Tucker John, Little Totteridge, Hazle- Peter, Gerrard's Cross R.S.O Mandeville, Aylesbury mere, High Wycombe Welch T. Layter's green, Chalfont St. Tarrant J. Eton wick, Eton, Winsdor Turner W. Great Brickhill, Bletchley Peter, Gerrard's Cross R.S.O Tattam John, Deverells, Swanbrne. W nslw Turney C. T. Chicheley, K ewport Pagnell Wells J ames, Ley hill, Chesham R.S.O Tayler G. Kickles frm. Newport Pagnell Turney J. Slapton, Leighton Buzzard West Arthur, Twigside, Ibstone, Tetswrth Taylor David, Haddenham, Thame TurneyJameFJ,Soulbury,LeightonBuzzrd West GBo. Stokenchurch, Wallingford Taylor G. Little Missenden, Amersham Turnham Henry, London road, Wycombe West Geor"e, Hundridae, Chesham R.S.O Taylor Henry, Newton Blossom ville, Twidell W. Dagnall, Great Berkhamstead West Robe~t, Daws hill~Radnage, Stoken- Newport Pagnell Tyler Thomas, Loosely row, Princes church, Wallingford Taylor J. Milton Keynes, Nwprt. Pagnell Risborough S.O West W. Lewkner-up-Hill,High Wycombe Taylor James, Lane farm, Kingswood, Uff Richard, Westcott, Aylesbury Westaway Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • Comm News 62
    Issue 62! Winter 2014 Shenley Brook End & Tattenhoe Community News The official source of Parish Council news & information for residents of Emerson Valley, Furzton, Kingsmead, Shenley Brook End, Shenley Lodge, Tattenhoe, Tattenhoe Park & Westcroft. Who were the Men on the conflict in Salonika, northern Greece, where more soldiers died from disease than from injuries. The other OBLI men Shenley War Memorial ? saw active service on the Western Front in France and Belgium, as did those Shenley soldiers who had joined Shenley War Memorial, which stands on the small green other infantry regiments. Three other Shenley soldiers outside St Mary's Church in Shenley Church End, bears the served with the big guns of the Royal Field Artillery. names of forty-seven men. It was erected after World Several Wolverton workers were drafted into the Royal War I by the community of St Mary's parish which Engineers transport section; they and the village school comprises the two civil parishes of Shenley Brook End and teacher in the Royal Army Medical Corps also would have Shenley Church End. Unlike most war memorials there is come under fire and some were injured. Only one Shenley just one list of everyone who took part in World War I. soldier is recorded as being captured as a prisoner of war. The names of the four Shenley men who died, George Cox, George Daniels, Arthur Shouler and Arthur Willett, are Not all the men on the memorial became soldiers. Two marked with a small black cross. It is not possible to brothers of the Cox family were in the navy, one in the identify everyone on the memorial from their surname and Royal Navy and the other in the Royal Australian Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do YOU Think?
    Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Consultation December 2020 What do YOU think? Contents Letter from the Steering Group Page 1 What You Told Us Page 3 Policy Intents Page 7 Design and Energy Efficiency Page 8 Non-designated Heritage Assets Page 9 Important Views Page 10 Designated Local Green Spaces Page 13 Green and Blue Infrastructure Network Page 14 Footpaths and Bridleways Page 16 Cycleways Page 18 Community Facilities Page 19 Traffic Page 20 Economy, Employment and Agriculture Page 20 Site Assessment Page 21 Questionnaire – insert Photo credit: Thank you to Laura Boddington who supplied most of the photographs. Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and Haversham-cum-Little-Linford Parish Council have been working for a considerable time to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish. We have been assisted in this by Oneill Homer, a leading consultancy who have assisted Parish and Town Councils around the country to produce well over 100 Neighbourhood Plans, including several in Milton Keynes. The cost of this consultancy work has been paid for by a government grant. What is a Neighbourhood Plan? A document that sets out planning policies for the neighbourhood area – planning policies are used to decide whether to approve planning applications. Written by the local community, the people who know and love the area, rather than the Local Planning Authority. A powerful tool to ensure the community gets the right types of development, in the right place. What is this document for? We had hoped to hold a public meeting / exhibition to discuss the significant work undertaken so far and find out YOUR views of our policy intents and the potential development sites offered by landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030
    Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Final version R September 2017 1 Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Published by Castlethorpe Parish Council for Pre-Submission Consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 and in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42. September 2017 Published by Castlethorpe Parish Council, 63 Thrupp Close, Castlethorpe, Milton Keynes MK19 7PL. Printed by Milton Keynes Council Print Services, 89-90 Priory Court, Bradwell Abbey, Milton Keynes MK13 9HF 2 Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Foreword I am very pleased to introduce our new respondents to the survey indicated a desire for Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan. additional housing with support for mainly The Plan is important because it defines how we smaller as well as some larger homes but with want our village to look over the next 15 years particular emphasis on affordable and in terms of development, building design, retirement/sheltered homes. However, there important buildings to be protected and local are no sites remaining within the existing Green Spaces. settlement boundary for additional housing. The Plan is powerful because, while it complies Following issue of the Plan for review, a response with national and Milton Keynes Planning was received from Carington Estates asking Policies, it defines local policies which must be that the field we call “Maltings 2” be designated followed by Milton Keynes Council when for housing. This site is bounded by Paddock considering planning applications. Close, Maltings Field, the railway and the It has taken a considerable amount of time and extension of Fox Covert Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions Made by Individual Cabinet Members/Officers
    Published: 8 July 2016 DELEGATED DECISION DATE: 5 JULY 2016 Present: Councillor Middleton (Cabinet member for Resources and Innovation), Councillor Nolan (Cabinet Member for Children and Families), M Bracey (Corporate Director – People), T Hannam (Corporate Director – Resources), N Jones (Service Director [Finance and Resources]), S Bridglalsingh (Acting Service Director [Legal and Democratic Services]), M Devlin-Hogg (Head of Human Resources), K Rashid (Interim Capital Programme Director), M Darbyshire (Strategic Lead - Access), S Sims (Strategic Lead – Children Missing Education) and S Heap (Committee Services and Scrutiny Manager) Also Present: Councillors Ganatra, A Geary and d Hopkins and 14 members of the public. Subject Decision Decision Maker Documents Taken Into Account Essential 1. That the Cool Air System in Civic Offices be replaced, in accordance with Councillor Report Maintenance of Air Statutory Health and Safety Duties, inter alia, Regulation 6 of the (Health, Middleton Cooling System in Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, SI 1992/3004, which requires that (Cabinet member Civic Offices effective and suitable provision be made to ensure that every enclosed for Resources and workplace is ventilated by a sufficient quantity of fresh or purified air. Innovation) 2. That a resource allocation and spend approval of £2.236m be added to the Capital Programme 2016/17 and £0.400m added into the Capital Programme 2017/18 to reflect the timing of the works. 3. That this decision be not implemented until after the meeting of the Scrutiny
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT INCLUDING PARKING ASSESSMENT CIVIC ENGINEERS December 2020
    TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT INCLUDING PARKING ASSESSMENT CIVIC ENGINEERS December 2020 1 Civic Engineers Job Title Prepared for Love Wolverton Love Wolverton Report Type Date Transport Assessment including Parking Assessment ISSUE v09 10 December 2020 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Commission .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Development Description ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Development Proposals and Vision ......................................................................................................................... 4 Report Content ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Planning History ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Existing Site and Transport Context .................................................................................................................. 6 Site Location .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review
    Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review Contents 1 General Context 2 Introduction 2 Location 6 Town Environs 6 Geology and Topography 7 Historic Development 7 Planning Framework 8 2 Local Character and Appearance 10 Defining Special Interest and the Management of Conservation Areas 10 The Definition of Special Interest for Newport Pagnell Conservation Area 11 Individual Character Areas 12 Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review Building Materials Guide 23 Further Afield - Buildings, Structures and Spaces Beyond the Conservation Area 26 Boundary Trees 26 The Setting of the Conservation Area 28 Conclusions 28 Milton Keynes Council 3 Revisions to the Conservation Area Boundary 29 4 Management Proposals 31 A References 36 1 . General Context Milton Keynes Council 1 General Context Picture 1 St Peter and St Paul's from Tickford Bridge Introduction 1.1 Conservation areas are places of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review enhance(1). Newport Pagnell was first designated as a conservation area by Buckinghamshire County Council in 1969 and last reviewed in 1996. In 2009 the conservation area was extended to include the surviving former Aston Martin works buildings on Tickford Street. Map 1 'Newport Pagnell: Conservation Area Boundary and Listed Buildings' shows the extent of the revised boundary. Map 7 'Amendments to the Conservation Area Boundary (27.7.10)' illustrates the additions to the1996 designation and 2009 south Picture 2 Shops on the High Street eastward extension arising from the review. 1.2 To protect the character and appearance of the conservation area a character statement is written that identifies and describes those features that are of special interest or which contribute to local character (see 2 'Local Character and Appearance' ).
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH BRICK SOCIETY Summer Meeting Saturday 25 July 2015 the FRINGES of MILTON KEYNES BRICKWORKS, RAILWAY STATIONS, CHURCHES Buildings Notes
    BRITISH BRICK SOCIETY Summer Meeting Saturday 25 July 2015 THE FRINGES OF MILTON KEYNES BRICKWORKS, RAILWAY STATIONS, CHURCHES Buildings Notes INTRODUCTION Timgad in a green field: the City of Milton Keynes is an artificial creation, no less than the Roman city on the edge of the desert in Algeria. Some of us remember the land between the M1 to the east and Watling Street (or the West Coast main railway line) to the west as green fields bisected by pleasant country roads and having isolated villages within them. The writer did the journey from Luton to Northampton very frequently in the late 1960s and the first seven years of the 1970s. Along the fringes of the new city the village centres and their eighteenth-century churches remain: Fenny Stratford, Bow Brickhill (not taken in by the new city), Willen, Great Linford. These notes will concentrate on these villages but will also record buildings in two of the old market towns ― Bletchley and Stony Stratford ― now subsumed within the new metropolis. The notes concentrate on three aspects of brick activity: brickworks and their surviving structure, railways and the buildings erected for them, and a group of churches, rebuilt in brick in the early eighteenth century. BRICKWORKS Beside the railway line from Oxford to Cambridge were many brickyards; this is particularly so in the Buckinghamshire section from north of Marsh Gibbon to Woburn Sands. The yards producing the self-combusting Flettons in the late nineteenth century and through to the end of the twentieth century are well-known. But the brickmaking industry around the fringes of Milton Keynes is much older than the last decades of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestricted Total Restricted Total Total 1St Emerson & Furzton Guides
    Unrestricted Restricted Total Total Total 1st Emerson & Furzton Guides 50 50 1st Emerson & Furzton Guides 120 120 1st Emerson & Furzton Guides 48 48 1st Shenley Brook End Brownies 50 50 1st Shenley Brook End Brownies 7 7 1st Shenley Brook End Brownies 65 65 1st Shenley Brook End Rainbows 70 70 1st Shenley Brook End Rainbows 60 60 1st Whitehouses Rainbows 300 300 2nd Loughton Guides 200 200 326 Hanslope After School Club 180 0 180 5th Newport Pagnell Brownies 48 48 5th Newport Pagnell Scout Group 1,496 1,496 Acornfields Community Interactions CIC 1,000 1,000 Age UK Milton Keynes 1,500 1,500 Age UK Milton Keynes 41,016 41,016 Age UK Milton Keynes 25,000 25,000 Age UK Milton Keynes 50 50 Akota British Bangladeshi Community in MK 1,000 1,000 Arabian School of Gymnastics 182 1,818 2,000 Arta & Heritage Alliance MK 4,800 4,800 Arts Gateway MK 2,000 2,000 Arts Gateway MK 520 520 Aspects Trust 1,100 1,100 Awake to Know Africa 1,000 1,000 Baba Zorawa Lunch Club 1,500 1,500 Beanhill Action Group 962 962 Bletchley Old Peoples' Welfare Committee 1,070 1,070 Bletchley Town Cricket Club 1,000 1,000 British Blind Sport 715 715 British Red Cross Society 874 874 Broughton Cycling Group 197 197 Broughton & Brooklands Community Connectors 300 300 Broughton Cycling Group 1,968 1,968 BucksVision MK 50 50 BucksVision MK 150 150 Camphill MK Communities 922 922 Care Services (MK) CIC 5,000 5,000 Carers Trust Thames 330 330 Carers Trust Thames 75 75 Chicheley Village Hall 5,000 5,000 Child Bereavement UK 500 1,000 1,500 Child Bereavement UK 2,000 18,000 20,000
    [Show full text]