DOCSLIB.ORG

Prophantis Smaragdina (Butler) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) in the Field

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prophantis Smaragdina (Butler) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) in the Field ( /) : : : Prophantis smaragdina !" #$ (Butler) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) ** * **** *** ** * *** ** **** . ! "#$ %& ' (! )* +, !*- /! !** &#0 & 1 23 45 !* */ '!* ! (6 & !** &#0- 6 '- # ,& )* +, !* ' 0 ;< ;8,:) "#$ %& ?!1 ( >$ !6- 4 ( 4 ! & . -@ # ! - & 6 ٤٧ ٤٨ /! !** &#0 23 45 B!C * A ! ' (6 & !** &#0- 6 '- # ,& "#$ %& D ! *C ( -@ # ! - +, !* & ;A,E: ;,EF) 6 ?!1 '!* B 1 0 . >$ !6- 4 ( 4 ! )* +3 0 ! !* & C /! !** &#0 ' !C . '!! '! +, !* & !# !* & Elasmus sp (Eulophidae:Hymenoptera) 3G .;FF,FF4 @ 3G -- (A !! , & +, +G (Pyralidae Prophantis smaragdina :!3 0 .'! (?!1 ('!* ("# (!*!6 !!!" °´ °´ °´ °´! )!! " #$%& ' (" °´! 2# %0 1) +, -%, . % )!! * ' # (" ' *0# .()34 ; ' .Eskesa and Mukred,1989) 7 1 8 9 :%,& genetics) < =' %, = (Coffea arabica L. $ >, 2 ? 81 $@ *0# (%# (groups 2< .A B C' 2< #$% <B 2A .D E1 = CFG% 2'%H ... ٤٩ I I0' J,I 2K%'%L % M NI J,I I =, $& 81 B% 2" *IL OL 2P %, 29 8 0" J, ' Prophantis ) I I< @ # Q @R KO% smaragdina (Butler) (=Thliptocera octoguttalis) (Pyralidae: . ; 2 J#S ; 2 80# .0 % 2(Lepidoptera *L # C, @ @ ( < J,% 7I I1 8 9 U!V! 2T 1 K U! I D8 8%S$ % , ; .(4!! 29, Mukred, 2000) 2C4!! ,I *% T%$ G % ' $% C0"H B UX! *L ! W%% < $ < @L ; *L .(4!!2D8) :@ >SB 2S JL % 1 >08%,% < $ T " ; Sao Tome C% , T' ' .(Derron, 1977) 8% T% G < ! * 3 I # 9S 2# YB *0# 1$ '; >S IA *I0# I1 CI< 2K% 2K%# *0# , E&Z S CI" 2D 0% # P%H E1 = C:G%% '% % A C4!! C# :@ ' – # 0B < @A B -I ,I%B I % @ [ % I0% .I I *I0# E% C% 8G % 2 # ٥٠ GOI$ I% I? < B # <% ( 9I'? 8 B 2 C;) 0 ' Ficus JI<A I ; =O 2 # %, .= # C%,% % 2 '; *0# salicifolius Vahl =I I% < @A B *% 0% . NS? ?; I# T % " T H ,$ DS %) 0% . NS? C%, 2T NS? B # 9 I SI$% *IL OL 2( J<A ; C%, ' GO$ O; E$%0 ,% E1% < -A # G . # T' ,% < I8 *% C4!! A ,A \:% S$% C% . B # C, 0 B %% 2%0 *0# C4!! ,I% I 27 1 8 9 2S 1 . . # . @ '%H D !#$ %!& ! ( 9D E@ , ! ?#;) '] # % E@) 7 1 8 9 2S 1 . . # C4!! # C, G =% C,% C% .(D,# ... ٥١ GI I8 A I M@ 2 0 % . I I% .A I<B $0 L *0# 0% % E1% CI0% I 2",I% .A =' *L OL 28" ., C, >IS 2JI<A 0 2] (&; @ < M0% 2J% IO I% Ficus salicifolius Vahl J<A T' ; =O *L OL < $ 0B 0 T %B 2 T' ; I% C% Y 2% 0 < >% 2 0 T 2J (7O) E' GO$ T " <G< C%, I ( 9I'? 8I B V) 0 #, – 4 I# CI, I ; . 0B 0 T A *0# @ TBSI ^$ G =% C,% -' 2C4!! I; # T# *A 0 @; Y 2G EG% = NG#; B 2 E1% % < 0 2 E1% J<A *IL IOL E1% % J<A ; *0# %% << 0 I<G< I0B DI = C1 ( '% @ . 0 J<A ; E1% ? G YG< ( B B T' ) B IB I'; .())! 2IZ B?,I) 8%G% % 0 YG<I GI IB 9 < ,% G # 0 %I, T , S$ . # @% J, 9 ,% 8%G% ٥٢ A I# C, B 2, B # C, %%% ^I$ (O; < # C, 2C4!! A ,A .A # C, T% .I I I *0# < T <B % C% DI# I I0 IB T< 4!! % 2NG#; TBS J,I J, % M$% < B 28 T 1% T@ ." G$% *0# @ 2" #; 2@H I :I, .A S % @ <0 " T (1 2% +, %%, =O $% *0# T' T#" *0# ; % .?#; J,%& -S # [%$% -' !'( )!$( . G < < " <B () ' +O :, G =' ; 1G Y . C4!! # C, E1% ; 2(T</ " !,!) % ; 2(T</ " !,!) J<A ; I< " <B $ *L ; " (T</ " !,!) aI >IS =I 2(T</ " !,`) <B I< I " <B 8 01 % J<A ; %0 ... ٥٣ I'% & IB 2 8%G< C, 8 *L O$ ; 2G >0% =' D@H 8' " I *I0# JI<A I; 0 % 1G @ <0 D , I$ E1% 0 ; % 0 :, 2-A G =I 2(U,4)) < @L "; #; 8B 2@ < , I (4) ' < . G NS? G% '% & >S I I " >? 81% C 2N'%& ^$ G =' , I I<B ; Cb *0# 2G >0% " #; & 2() ' . 8%G< .$% (4) ' 8 0', Ib $$ 1% T NS? ; >S 2\ E@ B * >S =' & M (G 8 9 ; *L >S 'L B B 2 <]I% >S =% 2 , 9 8 0" J, N NS? B 0B ] % ' = .$% S? 2D E1 *0# % 2D E1 J, T0 @% <B% * = ' 8 T CI0% 2:I MI I# 1A % 2# D C1 (OI; 1G 2@ <0 D , *L 1 .(Stambuli, 1988) *0# 2(UX) J<A ; 0 D@H 8' 9 .$% ' EI1% I0 ; 2(U) I% I0 :I, -A G .(4 ') (U4,4) ٥٤ .(& '(*) $% !""# . ! " ! " ! " ! " #$ / #$ / #$ / #$ / %,%* ) %,%( % % % % ' %,%& %,&+ &+,( %,%)( - %,%& + %,%& ( %,%+ &,%* ++ %,.' . %,%( ),( %,%( ),( %,%' &,(& +. &,-( ( %,%+ ',( %,%& (,( %,%' &,-& +% &,' .,( %,%& %,%& . %,%& ## ي، ن وون %,% &*,( %,% ' % & % + % # %,%+ &&,( %,%+ + % & % &,( % # &&,( ',.( '+,( %,%. +' %,% '',( %,& &*,.' %,() -,*- %,%&' ',+. %,%&& -,). %,%&- %,%& = !" #$ " ,= , (LSD0.01) .#$ %&$ ' ( !!" . ! " ! " ! " ! " #$ / #$ / #$ / #$ / %,(& ) %,%) & %,%& &,' %,%( ' %,%& %,&' (( %,(' ' %,%' &,' %,%& ),' %,%* (,&- &( %,+- (' %,(' ' %,%' (% %,( ا ق ا &,') *% (,+) &+ %,(' ' %,(' (' %,* . (,') (-,' %,)' (' %,% - %,%* &,' %,)' ## %,&) () %,% &' %,%& (,' %,(' (' %,% # %,%) (' %,%& % % &,' %,%& -,' %,%* # ادارة ا ت ... ((+,' +( %,* & %,* -',' (,&) (),%) %,') (* %,% %,% (&,&( %,(- .$,%& = ! "# ! ,= , (LSD0.01) ٥٥ ٥٦ . I < < " <B () ' +O G =' ; 1G Y . C4!! # C, G I0 ; 2( TI</ I" !,!3) E1% = J<A ; 0 :, =I JI<A I; 0 ; 2(T</ " !,) E1% = % <B $ *L ; " 2(T</ " !,!) E1% % !,XX) I I I I<B I 2I < " ; &L 2(I 8 E0%% & G =' a >S = 2(T</" CI, I8 *L O$ 01 8 < " <B 2@I I<0 ID , ; 2 8%G< G *0# E1% % = J<A ; 0 % 1G =I JI<A ; 0 ; 2 E1% = % 0 :, 2-A < @L "; #; 8B 2@ < , $ E1% N'%& ^$ G =' , () ' < .(U,`) 2G >0% " #; & " >? 81% C (OI; () I' 8 0', <B ; Cb *0# *I (O; >S =' & 2(') . 8%G< # "$% 1% *L 1 . b $$ 1% T NS? ; >S 2( E@ B 0 (D@L 9 .$% ' (O; 1G @ <0 D , GI I *I0# 2(U,`)) I E1% % = J<A ; I; 0 ; 2(U4,`)) E1% = % 0 :, 2-A .( ') (U4,X) E1% = J<A ... ٥٧ ^,b; 8 8%S *L 0@ " " #; ; 7D% +O% *0#; 0', 2(4 &') 8 9 . 2C4!! 2I% ^I$ ( &') C4!! %, 8 G 8 TS *I0#; 0'I, SL ((Sao Tome) C% , T' ' = .$% & S? ,I I I< TS ',I% =I 2 8 " NS8 TS .(Derron, 1977) 2# 0 C%?& # @% B 27D% *0# (%# JI<A I;) I0% . T$%,& 28' E1% < D " (D Q . NS? ; @ 2-; 8' (% I$ K # 9S %& 2G$% T DG I, NSI? B; Y 2D $ B C%, " Elasmus sp. (Eulophidae:Hymenoptera) 0 $% ',% , 2C4!! 8 . ' % < SI? ; =I' %I, G +O% .U2 * 0@ $% I8 I < $ ' T, ; 2 B '% C $% Apanteles coffeae Wilkinson III" III$% *IIIL =III' I? -; " G$% ; *L OL ((Hymenoptera:Braconidae) Phanerotoma I Pristomerus sp. (Macrocentrus sp. (Cratocnema sp. I" I$ % ; I<L Ib; I ' B .(Ndungi, 1994) sp. < " # , J, Apanteles coffeae Wilkinson .(Lepelley, 1968 and Abate, 1991) ٥٨ .(& '*+) $% !""# .() .(& '*+) $% !""# . & ' # !" & ' # !" & ' # !" & ' # !" () % /$ () % /$ () % /$ () % /$ *,+ *,+ . *,*+ . *,*. - *,*+ *,- *,. - *,*+ - *,*- *,*+ *, + *, *,* *,* . *,*. +,. + *, *,* +*, *,+ *,* !" ., . +,- *,+ , *,. *, ((" ي، ن وون *, ++ *, *,*- *,*- , *,+ ( *, , *, . * . * * ( *, , -- *,-- - *,- +, *, +.,- *, ,+ *,* ,+ *,* , *,+ .,=! "# $% # ,= , (LSD0.01) .$% &'% ( ) !""# . & ' ! "# & ' ! "# & ' ! "# & ' ! "# () % /$ () % /$ () % /$ () % /$ *,. *,.- *,*. *,*. - *,*+ *, .*,- *,- *,*+ - *,* *,* .,+ . .,* .. *,*. *,*. .- *,.- .,* .- *, .* *,*+ . *,*. *,* "# +,** + .,- -,- *,*. ++,- *,*+ .-,- *,*.- ((# *, . *,- *,*. ,- *,*+ . *,*- ( اق ا ادارة ا ت ... *,+ .,+ *,- - *,* .,- *,* .- *,*. ( .*, -,- *,- *,. ,- *,. ,- *, .-,- *,- -, *,*+ .+, *,* .+, *,*- .,%= !" #$ " ,= , (LSD0.01) ٥٩ ٦٠ IDS I ,I% '0 % B # < *0# 9 # T TL 2 ,$ T$ , ,$ .0 Y S8 80% : . (F::) ( .3@ (+ ( ! (**- C Leucoptera +3$ @ , !!- !! () Prophantis smaragdina (eucoptera '- # ,& '- + & caffeina Wash. 1& ( !) 6G & &0 +G '- # 4 caffeina WashButler) (! @ !0 ( '! ('!- 1&- (*@) G- .3@ FF8 ('! ('* ('* C .'* (G ( (F:) ! "# $ & '- # ,& 4 * (F) !" '" (#*+ %& .3@ F8E ('! - : , Abate, T. (1991) Entomophagous Arthropods of Ethiopia, A Catalog, IAR, Addis Abeba, Technical Manual No, 4, 50 p. Derron, M. (1977) Prophantis smaragdina (Butler) and Cryptophlebia colivora Meyrick (Lepidoptera): Two important pests on coffea arabica L. on the island of Sao Tome, Mitteilungen-der-Schweizerischen-Entomologische- Gesellschaft, 50(2): 149-151. Eskesa, A.B. and Mukred, A. W. O. (1989) Coffee survey in P.D.R.Yemen, Ministry of Agric., Aden, P.D.R. Y. Leppelley, R.H. (1968) Pests of Coffee, Longmans, Green & Co., London, 540 pp. Mukred, A.W. (2000) Brief Note on Coffee in Raymah District, Tihama, 2p. (unpublished). Ndungi, A.W. (1994) New natural enemies of the coffee berry moth, Prophantis smaragdina (Butler) in Kenya, Kenya Coffee, 59 (688): 1725-1726. Stambuli, M. (1988) The problem of coffee insect pests in Tanzania, Taro-newsletter, 3 (2): 10- 14. ... ٦١ The Traditional Methods of Integrated Pest Management: a Promising Strategy to reduce Population Density of Coffee Berry Moth, Prophantis smaragdina (Butler) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) in the Field Hassan Soliman Mahdi, Amin Al Hakimi*, Mohamed Mahyoub**, **** Ahmed Sayef**, Saeed Al Shargabi*** and Frederic Pelat Plant Protection Department, *Yemeni Genetic Resources center, Faculty of Agriculture, Sana'a University, **General Department of Plant Protection, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation (MAI), ***Coffee Department, MAI. 5 French Embassy/ Technical Cooperation (French Food Aid Counterpart Funds), Yemen Abstract. During 2004 season, in Medinat Ash – Sharq and Wadi Yaher, the Athab branches followed by smoking treatments reduced the population density of coffee berry moth in comparison to the control. Results have also showed that the Athab branches treatment was the most effective on reducing the % of fruits infestation (3.29% and 6% for Medinat Ash – Sharq and Wadi Yaher, respectively) compared to the other treatments of either smoking treatment or cleaning treatment. During 2005 season, in both Medinat Ash – Sharq and Wadi Yaher, the results showed that all traditional methods
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
    Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed.
    [Show full text]
  • From Field Courses to DNA Barcoding Data Release for West Papua - Making Specimens and Identifications from University Courses More Sustainable
    Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e25237 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e25237 Short Communications From field courses to DNA barcoding data release for West Papua - making specimens and identifications from university courses more sustainable Bruno Cancian de Araujo‡, Stefan Schmidt‡‡, Olga Schmidt , Thomas von Rintelen§, Agustinus Kilmaskossu|, Rawati Panjaitan|, Michael Balke ‡ ‡ SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Munich, Germany § Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin, Germany | Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, State University of Papua (UNIPA), Jalan Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, Indonesia Corresponding author: Bruno Cancian de Araujo ([email protected]) Academic editor: Dmitry Schigel Received: 23 Mar 2018 | Accepted: 29 May 2018 | Published: 05 Jun 2018 Citation: Cancian de Araujo B, Schmidt S, Schmidt O, von Rintelen T, Kilmaskossu A, Panjaitan R, Balke M () From field courses to DNA barcoding data release for West Papua - making specimens and identifications from university courses more sustainable. https://doi.org/ ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FC529346-029B-49FE-8E23-B2483CB61D4B Abstract The diversity of insects collected during entomological field courses at the University of West Papua (UNIPA), Indonesia, is studied using DNA barcoding tools. The results were compared with public data available for West Papua in the Barcode of Life Data System. During two training courses in 2013 and 2015, 1,052 specimens of insects were collected at eight sites near Manokwari in northern West Papua. The DNA sequences obtained from these specimens were assigned to 311 Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) and represent species in 27 families of Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera. Of those BINs, 294 (95%) were new to West Papua.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae) Oriane Lavogez, Centina Pinier, Samuel Nibouche, Brigitte Frerot
    Volatile compounds release by the hair pencils in male Prophantis smaragdina (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae) Oriane Lavogez, Centina Pinier, Samuel Nibouche, Brigitte Frerot To cite this version: Oriane Lavogez, Centina Pinier, Samuel Nibouche, Brigitte Frerot. Volatile compounds release by the hair pencils in male Prophantis smaragdina (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae). Journal of Insect Science, Oxford University Press, 2017, 17 (6), pp.1-5. 10.1093/jisesa/iex094. hal-02622250 HAL Id: hal-02622250 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02622250 Submitted on 26 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial| 4.0 International License Journal of Insect Science, (2017) 17(6): 121; 1–5 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iex094 Research Volatile Compounds Release by the Hair Pencils in Male Prophantis smaragdina (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae) Oriane Lavogez,1,2,3,5 Centina Pinier,4 Samuel Nibouche1 and Brigitte Frérot4 1CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 St Pierre, La Réunion, France, 2Université
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Strategies for Control of Coffee Insect Pests in Tanzania: a Review
    Innovative Strategies for Control of Coffee Insect Pests in Tanzania: A Review F. L., Magina1, D. L., Kilambo2, A. P. Maerere, and 1 J. M. Teri1 1Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI), Lyamungu, Moshi, Tanzania. 2Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Morogoro, Tanzania. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Coffee insect pests are one of the major factors which affect coffee production and quality. globally, coffee insect pests are estimated to cause losses of about 13%. However in Africa, yield losses can be much higher, particularly where Arabica and Robusta coffee are grown for a long time. In Tanzania the major insect pests are white coffee stem borer (Monochamus leuconatus), coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei), Antestia bugs (Antestiopsis spp), leaf miner (Leucoptera spp), green scale (Coccus spp) and mealy bugs (Planococcus kenyae). Minor important pests including yellow headed borer (Dirphya nigricornis), thrips (Diarthrothrips coffeae) and berry moth (Prophants smaragdina) are reported to vary in crop losses caused. For decades industrial chemicals have been used to control the prevailing coffee insect-pests. But uses of industrial chemicals have been reported to have negative implications to the environment, animals and human health. In the recent years worldwide, efforts have been focused to researching on the sustainable control measures for coffee insect pests. For a period of over ten years Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) has been developing ecologically and environmentally sustainable coffee insect-pests control measures which include; use of bio pesticides, traps, parasites, attractants and biological agents. These technologies are progressively adopted by coffee farmers in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management in the Global Arena
    Integrated Pest Management in the Global Arena This Handbook is dedicated to all the participants of the Michigan State University’s International IPM Short Course and to the faculty members who have provided support to this course. Integrated Pest Management in the Global Arena Edited by K.M. Maredia Professor Institute of International Agriculture and Department of Entomology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA D. Dakouo Senior Research Scientist INERA Bobo-Dioulasso Burkina Faso and D. Mota-Sanchez Research Associate Department of Entomology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA CABI Publishing CABI Publishing is a division of CAB International CABI Publishing CABI Publishing CAB International 44 Brattle Street Wallingford 4th Floor Oxon OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02138 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 Email: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi-publishing.org ©CAB International 2003. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Integrated pest management in the global arena /edited by K.M. Maredia, D. Dakouo, D. Mota-Sanchez p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-85199-652-3 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Maredia, Karim M. II. Dakouo, D. (Dona), 1951- III. Mota-Sanchez, D. (David), 1960- SB950.I4575 2003 632′.9--dc21 2002154965 ISBN 0 85199 652 3 Typeset by AMA DataSet, UK Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press, Trowbridge Contents Contributors ix Preface xv Acknowledgments xvii Foreword xix Acronyms and Abbreviations xxi 1Introduction and Overview 1 K.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance of Pests and Diseases in Arabica Coffee Production Systems
    Abundance of pests and diseases in Arabica coffee production systems in Uganda - ecological mechanisms and spatial analysis in the face of climate change Von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨atder Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universit¨atHannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktorin der Gartenbauwissenschaften (Dr. rer. hort.) genehmigte Dissertation von Theresa Ines Liebig, Dipl.-Agr.Biol. 2017 Referent: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Hans-Michael Poehling Korreferent: Prof. Dr. rer. hort. Christian Borgemeister Korreferent: Prof. Dr. rer. hort. Edgar Maiss Tag der Promotion: 17.07.2017 External supervisors / advisers Dr. Jacques Avelino Dr. Peter L¨aderach Dr. Piet van Asten Dr. Laurence Jassogne Funding Claussen Simon Stiftung Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development Abstract Coffee production worldwide is threatened by a range of coffee pests and diseases (CPaD). Integrated management options require an understanding of the bioecology of CPaD and the prevalent interdependencies within the agroecological context. The comparison of different shading systems (e.g. shade-grown vs. sun-grown coffee) and the identification of trade- offs for ecosystem services is still a matter of ongoing debates. There is little quantitative knowledge of field-level investigation on shade effects and its ecological mechanisms across environmental and shading system gradients. Considering the increasingly evident effects of progressive climate change on CPaD, the need to examine the balance of shade effects under different environmental conditions becomes apparent. With the example of the coffee grow- ing region of Mt Elgon, Uganda, this project aimed at addressing the complexity of shading effects on economically relevant CPaD using environmental and production system gradients. The approach was designed in an interdisciplinary manner, to involve the broader context of coffee agroforestry systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) Inferred from DNA and Morphology 141-204 77 (1): 141 – 204 2019
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2019 Band/Volume: 77 Autor(en)/Author(s): Mally Richard, Hayden James E., Neinhuis Christoph, Jordal Bjarte H., Nuss Matthias Artikel/Article: The phylogenetic systematics of Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) inferred from DNA and morphology 141-204 77 (1): 141 – 204 2019 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2019. The phylogenetic systematics of Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) inferred from DNA and morphology Richard Mally *, 1, James E. Hayden 2, Christoph Neinhuis 3, Bjarte H. Jordal 1 & Matthias Nuss 4 1 University Museum of Bergen, Natural History Collections, Realfagbygget, Allégaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Richard Mally [richard. [email protected], [email protected]], Bjarte H. Jordal [[email protected]] — 2 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Ser- vices, Division of Plant Industry, 1911 SW 34th Street, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA; James E. Hayden [[email protected]] — 3 Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Botanik, 01062 Dresden, Germany; Christoph Neinhuis [[email protected]] — 4 Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany; Matthias Nuss [[email protected]] — * Corresponding author Accepted on March 14, 2019. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on May 17, 2019. Published in print on June 03, 2019. Editors in charge: Brian Wiegmann & Klaus-Dieter Klass. Abstract. Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae form a species-rich monophylum of Crambidae (snout moths). Morphological distinction of the two groups has been diffcult in the past, and the morphologically heterogenous Spilomelinae has not been broadly accepted as a natural group due to the lack of convincing apomorphies.
    [Show full text]
  • La Pyrale Du Café Prophantis Smaragdina Butler
    La pyrale du café Prophantis smaragdina Butler 1. Taxonomie & description Nom : Prophantis smaragdina Butler 1875 Ordre : Lepidoptera, Superfamille : Pyraloidea, Famille : Crambidae. Description : L’adulte est un petit papillon nocturne (~2 cm d’envergure). Les ailes sont brunes et présentent une frange irrégulière jaune doré à l’arrière. Sur les ailes antérieures on distingue une petite tache jaune doré et trois taches blanches. Les taches sont bordées d’un brun Photo 1 : Prophantis smaragdina plus foncé que le reste de l’aile. Le ventre et les pattes (femelle) sont blanc nacré, l’extrémité de l’abdomen est jaune doré (Ph. 1). En fin de développement, les chenilles peuvent atteindre ~1.3 cm de long. Leur capsule céphalique est brun sombre. Leur face dorsale est vieux rose et présente une fine ligne grise longitudinale sur le dessus, ainsi que des points noirs alignés sur toute la longueur (Ph. 2). La face ventrale est blanc crème. 2. Biologie & dégâts - Les femelles de la pyrale du café pondent sur les cerises vertes. Les chenilles sortent des œufs et rentrent dans les cerises de café en les perçant (on dit alors, un peu à tort, que les fruits sont « piqués »). Elles se nourrissent de l’intérieur de la graine (l’albumen) et se développent pendant deux semaines en consommant plusieurs cerises de café. - Les cerises attaquées présentent des trous (« piqûres »). Elles jaunissent puis noircissent, et se décrochent alors facilement. Elles sont reliées par des fils de soie produits par les chenilles, au milieu desquels on trouve des amas de déjections brunes (Ph. 2). - Parfois, les femelles de la pyrale pondent à l’extrémité de la tige principale des caféiers, et les chenilles se développent à l’intérieur de cette tige.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance of Pests and Diseases in Arabica Coffee Production
    Abundance of pests and diseases in Arabica coffee production systems in Uganda - ecological mechanisms and spatial analysis in the face of climate change Von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨atder Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universit¨atHannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktorin der Gartenbauwissenschaften (Dr. rer. hort.) genehmigte Dissertation von Theresa Ines Liebig, Dipl.-Agr.Biol. 2017 Referent: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Hans-Michael Poehling Korreferent: Prof. Dr. rer. hort. Christian Borgemeister Korreferent: Prof. Dr. rer. hort. Edgar Maiss Tag der Promotion: 17.07.2017 External supervisors / advisers Dr. Jacques Avelino Dr. Peter L¨aderach Dr. Piet van Asten Dr. Laurence Jassogne Funding Claussen Simon Stiftung Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development Abstract Coffee production worldwide is threatened by a range of coffee pests and diseases (CPaD). Integrated management options require an understanding of the bioecology of CPaD and the prevalent interdependencies within the agroecological context. The comparison of different shading systems (e.g. shade-grown vs. sun-grown coffee) and the identification of trade- offs for ecosystem services is still a matter of ongoing debates. There is little quantitative knowledge of field-level investigation on shade effects and its ecological mechanisms across environmental and shading system gradients. Considering the increasingly evident effects of progressive climate change on CPaD, the need to examine the balance of shade effects under different environmental conditions becomes apparent. With the example of the coffee grow- ing region of Mt Elgon, Uganda, this project aimed at addressing the complexity of shading effects on economically relevant CPaD using environmental and production system gradients. The approach was designed in an interdisciplinary manner, to involve the broader context of coffee agroforestry systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Insect Pests of Coffee and Their Management in Nature-Friendly Production Systems
    19 Insect Pests of Coffee and their Management in Nature-friendly Production Systems Juan F. Barrera* El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Tapachula, Mexico Introduction used in mixtures or to make soluble instant coffee. Today, coffee is one of the world’s It is speculated that at least 700 years ago, most important agricultural products. For coffee (Coffea arabica L.) came out of the Abys- many developing countries, coffee has been sinian Mountains (present-day Ethiopia) in the second most important product, only merchant and slave-trader caravans heading after oil, because of the value in foreign cur- for the Arabian Peninsula. There, in Yemen, rency it generates. Coffee is the main source the first coffee plantations flourished. How- of income for more than 125 million people ever, it was not until the end of the 17th and worldwide, many of whom belong to very beginning of the 18th century that the Dutch low-income farming families of indigenous and French began coffee cultivation in their ethnic groups (Osorio, 2002). These families colonies abroad, putting an end to the Ara- of small farmers produce 75% of the world’s bians’ monopoly, and C. arabica commenced coffee. C. arabica is cultivated at middle the adventure of colonizing the world. Much and high altitudes in most of the producer later, in the 19th century, another coffee countries, particularly in Latin America, species, robusta (Coffea canephora Pierre ex while C. canephora is mostly cultivated at A. Froehner), was discovered on the plains of low altitudes in Africa and Asia where the western Africa (Coste, 1964; Haarer, 1964; climate and coffee rust (Hemileia vastatrix Smith, 1985; Wrigley, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Low Host Specificity and Abundance of Frugivorous Lepidoptera in the Lowland Rain Forests of Papua New Guinea
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Low host specificity and abundance of frugivorous lepidoptera in the lowland rain forests of Papua New Guinea Katerina Sam1,2*, Richard Ctvrtecka1, Scott E. Miller3, Margaret E. Rosati3, Kenneth Molem4, Kipiro Damas4,5,6, Bradley Gewa4, Vojtech Novotny1,2 1 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branisovska, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 2 Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, Branisovska, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 3 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of America, 4 New Guinea a1111111111 Binatang Research Center, Madang, Papua New Guinea, 5 The University of Papua New Guinea, Waigani, a1111111111 University, National Capital District, Papua New Guinea, 6 Papua New Guinea Forest Research Institute, a1111111111 Lae, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS We studied a community of frugivorous Lepidoptera in the lowland rainforest of Papua New Citation: Sam K, Ctvrtecka R, Miller SE, Rosati ME, Guinea. Rearing revealed 122 species represented by 1,720 individuals from 326 woody Molem K, Damas K, et al. (2017) Low host plant species. Only fruits from 52% (171) of the plant species sampled were attacked. On specificity and abundance of frugivorous average, Lepidoptera were reared from 1 in 89 fruits and a kilogram of fruit was attacked by lepidoptera in the lowland rain forests of Papua New Guinea. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171843. 1.01 individuals. Host specificity of Lepidoptera was notably low: 69% (33) of species attacked doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171843 plants from >1 family, 8% (4) fed on single family, 6% (3) on single genus and 17% (8) were Editor: William J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera : Pyralidae
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 21(5): 2245-2258 AN INVENTORY OF INDIAN PYRALIDS (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) George Mathew Division of Entomology, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala 680653, India Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT combination has been given. Altogether, 1646 species (against An inventory of 1646 species of pyralids so far recorded 1136 species reported in the Fauna of British India) is given. from India is presented indicating the year of publication While every attempt has been made to cover as many species and the current nomenclatural combination. A key adapted from literature is also given for separation of subfamilies. as possible, it is possible that some names could have been left out due to oversight. It is hoped that the present list may serve KEYWORDS as a draft for immediate reference until a detailed revision on Checklist, India, inventory, Lepidoptera, moths, Pyralidae, this group is prepared. subfamily key The classification followed in this work is the one proposed by Due to discovery of new species and also due to refinements in Munroe (1972) for the Pyralidae of America north of Mexico. the taxonomic techniques, considerable changes have taken Munroe and Solis (1999) have also given a detailed taxonomic place in the taxonomic status of various categories of the Indian treatment of this group. A key adapted from the above work is Pyralidae since publication of Sir George Hampson’s Fauna presented here for the separation of various subfamilies. volume in 1896 in the ‘Fauna of British India’ series. As a result, the nomenclature of a number of species had undergone REFERENCES changes, some times on several occasions and unaware of these Arora, G.S.
    [Show full text]