Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 205/Friday, October 23, 1998/Rules

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 205/Friday, October 23, 1998/Rules 56802 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 205 / Friday, October 23, 1998 / Rules and Regulations salicylate, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND men who have had transient ischemia of magnesium salicylate, naproxen HUMAN SERVICES the brain due to fibrin platelet emboli, sodium, and sodium salicylate. and for reducing the risk of death and/ ``Alcohol Warning'' [heading in boldface Food and Drug Administration or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) in type]: ``If you consume 3 or more patients with a previous infarction or 21 CFR Part 343 alcoholic drinks every day, ask your unstable angina pectoris. The agency doctor whether you should take [insert [Docket No. 77N±094A] also proposed professional labeling for the use of carbaspirin calcium, choline acetaminophen and one nonsteroidal RIN 0910±AA01 anti-inflammatory analgesic/antipyretic salicylate, magnesium salicylate, or active ingredientÐincluding, but not Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic, and sodium salicylate for rheumatologic limited to aspirin, carbaspirin calcium, Antirheumatic Drug Products for Over- diseases. Interested persons were choline salicylate, magnesium The-Counter Human Use; Final Rule invited to submit new data or file written comments, objections, or salicylate, or sodium salicylate] or other for Professional Labeling of Aspirin, requests for oral hearing before the pain relievers/fever reducers. Buffered Aspirin, and Aspirin in Combination With Antacid Drug Commissioner of Food and Drugs [Acetaminophen and (insert one regarding the proposal. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory Products In response to the TFM, the agency analgesic/antipyretic ingredientÐ AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, received four comments and three including, but not limited to aspirin, HHS. citizen petitions related to the carbaspirin calcium, choline salicylate, ACTION: Final rule. professional labeling of aspirin for magnesium salicylate, or sodium cardiovascular and cerebrovascular uses salicylate] may cause liver damage and SUMMARY: The Food and Drug (Ref. 1). No comments were received on stomach bleeding.'' Administration (FDA) is issuing as a the professional use of aspirin drug (b) Requirements to supplement final rule professional labeling for over- products for rheumatologic diseases. In approved application. Holders of the-counter (OTC) internal analgesic, response to two of the petitions, the approved applications for OTC drug antipyretic, and antirheumatic drug agency proposed to amend the products that contain internal analgesic/ products containing aspirin, buffered professional labeling section of the TFM antipyretic active ingredients that are aspirin, and aspirin in combination with for OTC internal analgesic, antipyretic, subject to the requirements of paragraph an antacid. This portion of the final and antirheumatic drug products to monograph is being issued prior to the (a) of this section must submit include an indication for aspirin for entire monograph so that the supplements under § 314.70(c) of this suspected acute MI (61 FR 30002, June professional labeling of these products chapter to include the required warning 13, 1996). In response to the proposed will reflect the latest information on amendment, the agency received 10 in the product's labeling. Such labeling cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and comments (Ref. 2). may be put into use without advance rheumatologic uses. FDA is issuing this In the TFM for OTC internal approval of FDA provided it includes final rule after considering comments on analgesic, antipyretic, and the exact information included in the agency's proposed regulation for antirheumatic drug products (53 FR paragraph (a) of this section. OTC internal analgesic, antipyretic, and 46204 at 46205), and in the proposed (c) Any drug product subject to this antirheumatic drug products, a amendment to the TFM (61 FR 30002), section that is not labeled as required proposed amendment to the regulation, the agency proposed that any final rule and that is initially introduced or and data and information that have that may issue based on the proposal initially delivered for introduction into come to the agency's attention. will be effective 12 months after the interstate commerce after April 23, EFFECTIVE DATE: October 25, 1999. date of publication in the Federal 1999, is misbranded under section 502 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida Register. Therefore, on or after October of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic I. Yoder, Center for Drug Evaluation and 25, 1998, the dissemination of Act (21 U.S.C. 352) and is subject to Research (HFD±560), Food and Drug professional labeling that does not regulatory action. Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, comply with this final rule may result Rockville, MD 20857, 301±827±2222. in regulatory action against the product, Dated: July 22, 1998. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the marketer, or both. Manufacturers are Michael A. Friedman, encouraged to comply voluntarily with Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs. I. Background this final rule at the earliest possible Donna E. Shalala, In the Federal Register of November date. Secretary of Health and Human Services. 16, 1988 (53 FR 46204), FDA published, The labeling in this final rule for [FR Doc. 98±28520 Filed 10±21±98; 10:58 under 21 CFR 330.10(a)(7), a notice of professional use of aspirin drug am] proposed rulemaking, in the form of a products contains complete information BILLING CODE 4160±01±F tentative final monograph (TFM), that on certain professional uses of aspirin, would establish conditions in part 343 including information for professionals (21 CFR part 343) under which OTC on the treatment of the signs and internal analgesic, antipyretic, and symptoms of rheumatologic disease. antirheumatic drug products are The labeling is organized and presented generally recognized as safe and in a manner similar to that required of effective and not misbranded. In the prescription drug products under TFM (53 FR 46204 at 46258 and 46259), §§ 201.56 and 201.57 (21 CFR 201.56 the agency proposed professional and 201.57). The labeling in this final labeling in § 343.80 for the use of rule also includes an optional highlights aspirin for rheumatologic diseases, for section that summarizes the reducing the risk of recurrent transient professional indications and the ischemic attacks (TIA's) or stroke in recommended dosage and Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 205 / Friday, October 23, 1998 / Rules and Regulations 56803 administration for each professional individuals at low risk of having a heart also had evidence of an old MI. The indication. attack who would be treated long term. exact number of cases with prior MI in The Committee unanimously agreed the entire study population at the time II. The Agency's Conclusions on the that patients should ask their doctor of randomization is not known. Comments before beginning prophylactic therapy. Therefore, it is not possible to determine A. Comments to the TFM The agency has considered the with assurance how much of the effect 1. One comment requested that Committee's views in conjunction with of aspirin attributed to prevention of a aspirin be approved for use as a the additional data that have been primary MI was really prevention of a prophylaxis for primary (first) MI under subsequently submitted to FDA. reinfarction. The agency does not consider the The U.S. Physicians' Health Study a physician's supervision. The comment results of the aspirin component of the also found a statistically significant based its request on the preliminary U.S. Physicians' Health Study adequate reduction in the risk of fatal acute MI in report of a large, highly statistically to support the effectiveness of aspirin in the aspirin group, but no overall effect significant, reduction (47 percent) in the decreasing the risk of MI in healthy on survival. The agency does not risk of total (fatal and nonfatal) MI in individuals without evidence of consider this finding persuasive. subjects taking aspirin in the U.S. coronary artery disease because of Assessing cause-specific mortality is Physicians' Health Study (Ref. 3). A concerns about the revised primary usually difficult and the finding of final report was published later (Ref. 4). endpoint, the study population, and the benefit is of uncertain meaning in the The agency also considered the results of the British Doctors Study. face of equivalent total cardiovascular British Doctors Study, by Peto et al. The primary endpoint described in mortality (the original primary (Ref. 5), that was similar in many the protocol for the aspirin component endpoint). Thus, the decrease in acute respects to the U.S. Physicians' Health of the U.S. Physicians' Health Study MI deaths in the aspirin group were Study. It randomized 5,139 apparently was total cardiovascular mortality. On almost matched by an increase in healthy male doctors, to 500 milligrams interim evaluations, however, it became sudden deaths, not an obviously (mg) aspirin daily, or to no aspirin, to clear to the Data Monitoring Board worthwhile effect. Redefinition of see whether aspirin would reduce the (DMB) for the study that the aspirin arm endpoints would, in any case, require incidence of, and mortality from, stroke, of the study had little chance of adjustment for multiplicity, but it is MI, or other vascular conditions. The showing a survival effect before the year difficult to describe the appropriate British Doctors Study, despite its 2000, if then, because the mortality rate adjustment, as the number of possible similarity to the U.S. Physicians' Health was far lower than expected and the secondary endpoints is unspecified. The Study, does not support the use of study did not show even a positive nominally significant decrease of fatal aspirin to prevent an initial MI. After 6 trend for this endpoint. There were 81 MI (p = 0.004) thus needs considerable years of followup, there were 23.5 deaths in the aspirin group and 83 in upward adjustment and would not be confirmed nonfatal MI reports per 1,000 the placebo group (p = 0.87). The DMB close to the significance level needed at participants in the aspirin group and 24 also took note of the reductions in total an interim point (p < 0.0027).
Recommended publications
  • Table S1: Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 Score of NLP Vs. ICD for Identification of Symptoms for (A) Biome Developm
    Table S1: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score of NLP vs. ICD for identification of symptoms for (A) BioMe development cohort; (B) BioMe validation cohort; (C) MIMIC-III; (D) 1 year of notes from patients in BioMe calculated using manual chart review. A) Fatigue Nausea and/or vomiting Anxiety Depression NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.99 (0.93- 0.59 (0.43- <0.00 0.25 (0.12- <0.00 <0.00 0.54 (0.33- Sensitivity 0.99 (0.9 – 1) 0.98 (0.88 -1) 0.3 (0.15-0.5) 0.85 (0.65-96) 0.02 1) 0.73) 1 0.42) 1 1 0.73) 0.57 (0.29- 0.9 (0.68- Specificity 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.75 (0.19-1) 0.68 0.97 (0.77-1) 0.03 0.98 (0.83-1) 0.22 0.81 (0.53-0.9) 0.96 (0.79-1) 0.06 0.82) 0.99) 0.99 (0.92- 0.86 (0.71- 0.94 (0.79- 0.79 (0.59- PPV 0.96 (0.82-1) 0.3 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.02 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.16 0.93 (0.68-1) 0.12 1) 0.95) 0.99) 0.92) 0.13 (0.03- <0.00 0.49 (0.33- <0.00 0.66 (0.48- NPV 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.007 0.94 (0.63-1) 0.34 (0.2-0.51) 0.97 (0.81-1) 0.86 (0.6-0.95) 0.04 0.35) 1 0.65) 1 0.81) <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.99 0.83 0.88 0.57 0.95 0.63 0.82 0.79 0.002 1 1 1 Itching Cramp Pain NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.98 (0.86- 0.24 (0.09- <0.00 0.09 (0.01- <0.00 0.52 (0.37- <0.00 Sensitivity 0.98 (0.85-1) 0.99 (0.93-1) 1) 0.45) 1 0.29) 1 0.66) 1 0.89 (0.72- 0.5 (0.37- Specificity 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.68 0.98 (0.88-1) 0.18 0.5 (0-1) 1 0.98) 0.66) 0.88 (0.69- PPV 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.8 (0.54-1) 0.32 0.8 (0.16-1) 0.22 0.99 (0.93-1) 0.98 (0.87-1) NA* 0.97) 0.98 (0.85- 0.57 (0.41- <0.00 0.58 (0.43- <0.00 NPV 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.5 (0-1) 0.02 (0-0.08) NA* 1) 0.72) 1 0.72) 1 <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.97 0.56 0.91 0.28 0.99 0.68 1 1 1 *Denotes 95% confidence intervals and P values that could not be calculated due to insufficient cells in 2x2 tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Antipyretic Efficacy of an Initial 30-Mg/Kg Loading Dose of Acetaminophen Versus a 15-Mg/Kg Maintenance Dose
    Antipyretic Efficacy of an Initial 30-mg/kg Loading Dose of Acetaminophen Versus a 15-mg/kg Maintenance Dose Jean Marc Tre´luyer, MD, PhD*; Sylvie Tonnelier, PharmD*; Philippe d’Athis‡; Beatrice Leclerc§; Isabelle Jolivet-Landreau, MD§; and Ge´rard Pons, MD, PhD* ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare the antipyretic comfort.1 Among the available antipyretic agents, efficacy of an initial 30-mg/kg acetaminophen loading acetaminophen is one of the most widely used be- dose versus a 15-mg/kg maintenance dose. cause it has an antipyretic efficacy equivalent to the Methods. A double-blind, parallel-group, random- other antipyretic drugs and a good safety profile.2–4 ized clinical trial was conducted. A total of 121 febrile Acetaminophen antipyretic efficacy is dose-depen- (rectal temperature between 39°C and 40°C) but other- dent.5,6 The recommended dose is 15 mg/kg every 6 wise healthy outpatients who were 4 months to 9 years of 2 age and weighed 4 to 26 kg were assigned randomly to 1 hours. Following this dosing schedule, it usually -takes several hours after the first acetaminophen ad ؍ and 30 mg/kg (n (62 ؍ of the dose groups: 15 mg/kg (n 59). ministration to obtain the maximal clinical efficacy of Results. In an “intention to treat” analysis, the time to the drug.7 Therefore, Mahar et al8 suggested a phys- obtain a temperature lower than 38.5°C was significantly ical “cold therapy” at the initiation of the chemical shorter in the 30-mg/kg than in the 15-mg/kg group treatment to decrease the time course to antipyretic minutes vs 139 ؎ 113 minutes).
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Report—Fever and Antipyretic Use in Children Abstract
    Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care Clinical Report—Fever and Antipyretic Use in Children Janice E. Sullivan, MD, Henry C. Farrar, MD, and the abstract SECTION ON CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, and COMMITTEE ON DRUGS Fever in a child is one of the most common clinical symptoms managed by pediatricians and other health care providers and a frequent cause KEY WORDS fever, antipyretics, children of parental concern. Many parents administer antipyretics even when ABBREVIATIONS there is minimal or no fever, because they are concerned that the child NSAID—nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug must maintain a “normal” temperature. Fever, however, is not the The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive primary illness but is a physiologic mechanism that has beneficial course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. effects in fighting infection. There is no evidence that fever itself wors- Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be ens the course of an illness or that it causes long-term neurologic appropriate. complications. Thus, the primary goal of treating the febrile child This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors should be to improve the child’s overall comfort rather than focus on have filed conflict of interest statements with the American the normalization of body temperature. When counseling the parents Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through or caregivers of a febrile child, the general well-being of the child, the a process approved by the Board of Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2010/099522 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 2 September 2010 (02.09.2010) WO 2010/099522 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 45/06 (2006.01) A61K 31/4164 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/4045 (2006.01) A61K 31/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) International Application Number: DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US2010/025725 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 1 March 2010 (01 .03.2010) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (25) Filing Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (26) Publication Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/156,129 27 February 2009 (27.02.2009) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, HELSINN THERAPEUTICS (U.S.), INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances
    WHO/PSM/QSM/2006.3 The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances 2006 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Evaluation of Novel Dimers of an Arylpropionic Acid Class of Non-Selective Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
    Halimi et al Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research February 2017; 16 (2): 327-336 ISSN: 1596-5996 (print); 1596-9827 (electronic) © Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, 300001 Nigeria. All rights reserved. Available online at http://www.tjpr.org http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v16i2.10 Original Research Article Pharmacological evaluation of novel dimers of an arylpropionic acid class of non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors Syed Muhammad Ashhad Halimi1*, Muhammad Saeed1, Safiullah1 and Khalid Muhammed Khan2 1Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, 2H.E.J. International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan *For correspondence: Email: [email protected]; Tel: +92 91 9216750; Fax: +92 91 9218318 Received: 4 August 2016 Revised accepted: 5 January 2017 Abstract Purpose: To explore and identify cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors with optimal potency and efficacy using an arylpropionic acid class of drugs as lead molecules. Methods: The selected lead molecules were dimerised through chemical processes (reflux condensation) and characterised in terms of structural properties using infrared, proton nuclear magnetic resonance, electron impact mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis techniques. The molecules were evaluated pharmacologically for acute toxicity and anti-inflammatory (carrageenan- induced paw oedema test), analgesic (acetic acid-induced writhing test in mice), and antipyretic (Brewer’s yeast-induced pyrexia test in mice) activities against control (normal saline) and relevant reference standard drugs. Docking analyses were also performed to assess possible protein–ligand interactions. Results: The test compounds were non-toxic at doses of 50, 100 and 150 mg/kg body weight, ip.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Techniques for Analysis of Aspirin, Caffeine, Diclofenac Sodium and Paracetamol: Review Article
    ISSN 2692-4374 Pharmaceutical Sciences | Review Article Different techniques for Analysis of Aspirin, Caffeine, Diclofenac Sodium and Paracetamol: Review Article Mahmoud M. Sebaiy1*, Sobhy M. El-Adl1, and Amr A. Mattar1&2 1 Medicinal Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. 2 Pharmaceutical Medicinal Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Egyptian Russian University, Badr City, Cairo 11829, Egypt. *Аuthоrcоrrеspоndеncе: Е-mаil: mmsеbаiу@zu.еdu.еg; sеbаiуm@gmаil.cоm.Tеl: 01062780060. Fаx: 0552303266 Submitted: 27 April 2020 Approved: 11 May 2020 Published: 14 May 2020 How to cite this article: Sebaiy MM, El-Adl SM, Mattar AA. Different techniques for Analysis of Aspirin, Caffeine, Diclofenac Sodium and Paracetamol: Review Article. G Med Sci. 2020; 1(1): 013-031. https://www.doi.org/10.46766/thegms.pharma.20042701 Copyright: © 2020 Mahmoud MS. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unre- stricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTracT Early treatment of pain is of a great importance as unrelieved pain can have profound psychological effects on the patient, and acute pain that is poorly managed initially can degenerate into chronic pain, which may prove to be much more difficult to treat. It is important to assess and treat the article,mental weand will emotional shed the aspects light on of different the pain waysas well of assome its physicalanalgesic aspects. drugs monitoring Although drug and therapyanalysis isusing a mainstay different of techniques pain treatment, in addition physical to methodsthe most such as physiotherapy (including massage and the application of heat and cold), surgery, and drug monitoring are also very valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulations Comprising Nanoparticulate Meloxicam
    (19) TZZ¥ZZ¥__T (11) EP 3 090 731 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 09.11.2016 Bulletin 2016/45 A61K 9/14 (2006.01) A61K 31/5415 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 16161176.9 (22) Date of filing: 27.02.2004 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Ryde, Tuula AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Malvern, PA Pennsylvania 19355 (US) HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR • Pruitt, John, D. Suwanee, GA Georgia 30024 (US) (30) Priority: 03.03.2003 US 450705 P • Kline, Laura Harleysville, PA Pennsylvania 19438 (US) (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in accordance with Art. 76 EPC: (74) Representative: Wichmann, Hendrik 08006465.2 / 1 938 803 Wuesthoff & Wuesthoff 04785761.0 / 1 617 816 Patentanwälte PartG mbB Schweigerstraße 2 (71) Applicant: DV Technology LLC 81541 München (DE) Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (US) Remarks: (72) Inventors: This application was filed on 18-03-2016 as a • Cooper, Eugene, R. divisional application to the application mentioned Berwyn, PA Pennsylvania 19312 (US) under INID code 62. (54) FORMULATIONS COMPRISING NANOPARTICULATE MELOXICAM (57) The present invention is directed to composi- than about 2 microns; wherein said effective average par- tions comprising meloxicam. The stable meloxicam com- ticle size is different than the particle size of the nano- positions comprise (a) nanoparticulate particles of mel- particulate particles of meloxicam (a); and (c) at least one oxicam having an effective average particle size of less surface stabilizer. The invention relates also to uses of than about 2000 nm, (b) particles of meloxicam having the composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on Salicylic Acid (CAS 69-72-7) - Submission I - Corrigendum of 20-21 June 2019
    SCCS/1601/18 Final Opinion Corrigendum of 20-21 June 2019 Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS OPINION ON salicylic acid (CAS 69-72-7) Submission I The SCCS adopted the final Opinion by written procedure on 21 December 2018 Corrigendum of 20-21 June 2019 SCCS/1601/18 Final Opinion Opinion on salicylic acid (CAS 69-72-7) - Submission I - Corrigendum of 20-21 June 2019 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Members of the Working Group are acknowledged for their valuable contribution to this Opinion. The members of the Working Group are: For the preliminary and the final Opinion The SCCS members: Dr U. Bernauer Dr L. Bodin Prof. Q. Chaudhry (SCCS Chair) Prof. P.J. Coenraads (SCCS Vice-Chair and Chairperson of the WG) Prof. M. Dusinska Dr J. Ezendam Dr E. Gaffet Prof. C. L. Galli Dr B. Granum Prof. E. Panteri (Rapporteur) Prof. V. Rogiers (SCCS Vice-Chair) Dr Ch. Rousselle Dr M. Stepnik Prof. T. Vanhaecke Dr S. Wijnhoven External experts: Dr A. Simonnard Dr A. Koutsodimou Prof. W. Uter The additional contribution of the following external expert is gratefully acknowledged: Dr. N. von Goetz All Declarations of Working Group members are available on the following webpage: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/experts/declarations/sccs_en.htm This Opinion has been subject to a commenting period of a minimum eight weeks after its initial publication (from 10 September until 14 November 2018). Comments received during this time were considered by the SCCS. For this Opinion, comments received resulted in the following main changes: sections 3.3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
    Non Steroidal Anti‐inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) 4 signs of inflammation • Redness ‐ due to local vessel dilatation • Heat ‐ due to local vessel dilatation • Swelling – due to influx of plasma proteins and phagocytic cells into the tissue spaces • Pain – due to local release of enzymes and increased tissue pressure NSAIDs • Cause relief of pain ‐. analgesic • Suppress the signs and symptoms of inflammation. • Exert antipyretic action. • Useful in pain related to inflammation. Esp for superficial/integumental pain . Classification of NSAIDs • Salicylates: aspirin, Sodium salicylate & diflunisal. • Propionic acid derivatives: ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen. • Aryl acetic acid derivatives: diclofenac, ketorolac • Indole derivatives: indomethacin, sulindac • Alkanones: Nabumetone. • Oxicams: piroxicam, tenoxicam Classification of NSAIDs ….. • Anthranilic acid derivatives (fenamates): mefenamic acid and flufenamic acid. • Pyrazolone derivatives: phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, azapropazone (apazone) & dipyrone (novalgine). • Aniline derivatives (analgesic only): paracetamol. Clinical Classif. • Non selective Irreversible COX inhibitors • Non slective Reversible COX inhibitors • Preferential COX 2 inhibitors • 10‐20 fold cox 2 selective • meloxicam, etodolac, nabumetone • Selective COX 2 inhibitors • > 50 fold COX ‐2 selective • Celecoxib, Etoricoxib, Rofecoxib, Valdecoxib • COX 3 Inhibitor? PCM Cyclooxygenase‐1 (COX‐1): -constitutively expressed in wide variety of cells all over the body. -"housekeeping enzyme" -ex. gastric cytoprotection, hemostasis Cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2): -inducible enzyme -dramatically up-regulated during inflammation (10-18X) -constitutive : maintains renal blood flow and renal electrolyte homeostasis Salicylates Acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin). Kinetics: • Well absorbed from the stomach, more from upper small intestine. • Distributed all over the body, 50‐80% bound to plasma protein (albumin). • Metabolized to acetic acid and salicylates (active metabolite). • Salicylate is conjugated with glucuronic acid and glycine. • Excreted by the kidney.
    [Show full text]
  • Uses and Abuses of Antipyretic Therapy
    USES AND ABUSES OF ANTIPYRETIC THERAPY By Alan K. Done, M.D. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine F undoubtedly the most common ben of points which deserve consideration symptom confronting the physician before one elects to use an antipyretic. who treats children. It is fought as though DuBois’ summarized a lifetime of study it were the patient’s primary disease, and on fever and the regulation of body tem. its mere presence is often accepted as being penature with the statement: “Fever is only sufficient indication for the institution of a symptom and we are not sure that it is antipyretic therapy. It is not surprising, an enemy. Perhaps it is a friend.” The litena- therefore, that therapeutists and pharma- tune concerning the possible role of fever in ceutical concerns have energetically sought body defenses is extensive and inconclusive. new and better drugs for the control of There is little question that artificially in- fever. In the past few years there has ap- duced fever is of some value in the treat- peared on the market a number of new ment of such diseases as neurosyphilis, cer- formulations which are purported to offer tam inflammations of the eye, and arthritis. distinct advantages in terms of antipyretic In animal experiments, elevation of body potency, acceptance by children, and/or temperature has been shown to be of im- reduced toxicity. portance in resistance to certain infections.2 It is axiomatic that virtually any claim Body temperatures of greater than 106#{176}F regarding a drug can be supported by pub- (41.1#{176}C) rarely occur except under highly lished data, if the proper study is selected anomalous circumstances, and this level is and interpretation is sufficiently influenced probably safely below the point at which by conviction.
    [Show full text]
  • Emit®Tox™ Salicylic Acid Assay
    3 METHODOLOGY The Emit® tox™ Salicylic Acid Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay technique used for the quantitative analysis of salicylic acid in human serum or plasma.7 In the performance of the Emit® tox™ Salicylic Acid Assay, serum or plasma is mixed with Reagent 1, which contains antibodies to salicylic acid and the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). Subsequently, Reagent 2, which contains salicylic acid ™ labeled with the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), is added. Salicylic acid in Emit tox Salicylic Acid Assay the sample and salicylic acid-labeled G6PDH compete for antibody binding sites. Enzyme activity ® decreases upon binding to the antibody, so the salicylic acid concentration in the sample can be measured in terms of enzyme activity. Active enzyme converts oxidized NAD to NADH, resulting May 2012 7S052.2D_C in an absorbance change that is measured spectrophotometrically. Endogenous G6PDH does not interfere because the coenzyme functions only with the bacterial (Leuconostoc mesenteroides) enzyme employed in the assay. See shaded sections: Updated information from August 2010 version. 4 REAGENTS Reagents contain the following substances: Mouse monoclonal antibodies reactive to salicylic acid (60.4 µg/mL),* salicylic acid labeled with bacterial G6PDH (0.34 U/mL), glucose-6-phosphate (22 mM), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (18 mM), Tris buffer, bovine serum albumin, preservatives, and stabilizers. Catalog Quantity/ *The antibody titer and enzyme conjugate activity may vary from lot to lot. Number Product Description Volume For in vitro diagnostic use. OSR7S229 Emit® tox™ Salicylic Acid Assay Precautions OSR7S518 R1 (Antibody/Substrate Reagent 1) 2 x 32 mL • Reagents contains nonsterile mouse monoclonal antibodies.
    [Show full text]