Congressmen 1788-1838

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

4th Congress U. S. Congressional Election 14 October 1794 1795-1797 Name Party Vote Name Party Vote Name Party Vote 1st District: Robert Lollar Anti-Admin 1,072 10th District: John Swanwick Anti-Admin 1,240 John P. Muhlenberg Anti-Admin 661 David Bard Anti-Admin 1,808 Thomas Fitzsimons Federalist 1,182 James Barclay 195 James McLane Anti-Admin 1,090 James Chambers Federalist 519 2nd District: 5th District: Frederick Muhlenberg Federalist 656 Daniel Hiester Anti-Admin 11th District: Samuel Miles Anti-Admin 510 Unopposed. Data incomplete. William Findley Anti-Admin Unopposed. Data incomplete. 3rd District: 6th District: 12th District: Richard Thomas Federalist 1,222 Samuel Maclay Anti-Admin 1,882 Albert Gallatin Anti-Admin 769 Thomas Ross Anti-Admin 571 John A. Hanna Anti-Admin 1,722 Thomas Scott Federalist 643 John Carson Federalist 438 4th District (2 elected): Daniel Hamilton Anti-Admin 377 Samuel Sitgreaves Federalist 2,954 7th District: Hugh H. Brackenridge Anti-Admin? 140 John Richards Federalist 1,635* John Wilkes Kittera Federalist John Woods Federalist 137 James Morris Anti-Admin 1,648* Unopposed. Data incomplete. Isaac Tichenor Federalist 256 The governor of Pennsylvania refused to 8th District: Special Election issue a certificate of election. Morris died Thomas Hartley Federalist 11 October 1796 10 July 1795 before the House took up the Unopposed. Data incomplete. 5th District: matter. Richard’s claimed he had been duly George Ege Federalist 2,039 elected in the first place. The House voted 9th District: Joseph Heister Anti-Admin 1,553 to seat Richards on 18 January 1786. The Andrew Gregg Anti-Admin 383 Replaced an Anti-Administration con- revised vote was Richards 1,791, Morris James Wallace Federalist 525 gressman, thereby giving a majority of the 1,688. William Irvine Anti-Admin 470 delegation to the Federalists, 7 to 6. Boldface indicates winner. Italics indicate incumbent. 4th Congress: 1795-1797 Anti-Administration - 7 Federalist (Administration) - 6 NORTHUMBERLAND LUZERNE ALLEGHENY 6 5 4 2 seats MIFFLIN 12 NORTHAMPTON 5 HUNTINGDON 9 BERKS BUCKS WESTMORELAND DAUPHIN MONTGOMERY 11 CUMBERLAND WASHINGTON 10 LANCASTER CHESTER PHILA. BEDFORD 2 FAYETTE 8 7 DELAWARE PHILA. FRANKLIN YORK 3 1CITY Source: Dubin, Congressional Elections, pp. 11-13. 13 January 2007.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

High Court of Congress: Impeachment Trials, 1797-1936 William F
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Popular Media Faculty and Deans 1974 High Court of Congress: Impeachment Trials, 1797-1936 William F. Swindler William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Swindler, William F., "High Court of Congress: Impeachment Trials, 1797-1936" (1974). Popular Media. 267. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media/267 Copyright c 1974 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media High Court of Congress: Impeachment Trials, 1797-1936 by William F. Swindler Twelve "civil officers" of the United States have tacle, appear to have rested more on objective (and been subjected to trials on impeachment articles perhaps quasi-indictable) charges. in the Senate. Both colorful and colorless figures The history of impeachment as a tool in the struggle have suffered through these trials, and the nation's for parliamentary supremacy in Great Britain and the fabric has been tested by some of the trials. History understanding of it at the time of the first state constitu- shows that impeachment trials have moved from tions and the Federal Convention of 1787 have been barely disguised political vendettas to quasi-judicial admirably researched by a leading constitutional his- proceedings bearing the trappings of legal trials. torian, Raoul Berger, in his book published last year, Impeachment: Some Constitutional Problems. Like Americans, Englishmen once, but only once, carried the political attack to; the head of state himself. In that encounter Charles I lost his case as well as his head. The decline in the quality of government under the Com- monwealth thereafter, like the inglorious record of MPEACHMENT-what Alexander Hamilton called American government under the Reconstruction Con- "the grand inquest of the nation"-has reached the gresses, may have had an ultimately beneficial effect.
[Show full text]
1823 Journal of General Convention
Journal of the Proceedings of the Bishops, Clergy, and Laity of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America in a General Convention 1823 Digital Copyright Notice Copyright 2017. The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America / The Archives of the Episcopal Church All rights reserved. Limited reproduction of excerpts of this is permitted for personal research and educational activities. Systematic or multiple copy reproduction; electronic retransmission or redistribution; print or electronic duplication of any material for a fee or for commercial purposes; altering or recompiling any contents of this document for electronic re-display, and all other re-publication that does not qualify as fair use are not permitted without prior written permission. Send written requests for permission to re-publish to: Rights and Permissions Office The Archives of the Episcopal Church 606 Rathervue Place P.O. Box 2247 Austin, Texas 78768 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 512-472-6816 Fax: 512-480-0437 JOURNAL .. MTRJI OJr TllII "BISHOPS, CLERGY, AND LAITY O~ TIU; PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH XII TIIJ! UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Xif A GENERAL CONVENTION, Held in St. l'eter's Church, in the City of Philadelphia, from the 20th t" .the 26th Day of May inclusive, A. D. 1823. NEW· YORK ~ PlllNTED BY T. lit J. SWURDS: No. 99 Pearl-street, 1823. The Right Rev. William White, D. D. of Pennsylvania, Pre siding Bishop; The Right Rev. John Henry Hobart, D. D. of New-York, The Right Rev. Alexander Viets Griswold, D. D. of the Eastern Diocese, comprising the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusct ts, Vermont, and Rhode Island, The Right Rev.
[Show full text]
H. Doc. 108-222
FOURTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1795, TO MARCH 3, 1797 FIRST SESSION—December 7, 1795, to June 1, 1796 SECOND SESSION—December 5, 1796, to March 3, 1797 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—June 8, 1795, to June 26, 1795 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—JOHN ADAMS, of Massachusetts PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—HENRY TAZEWELL, 1 of Virginia; SAMUEL LIVERMORE, 2 of New Hampshire; WILLIAM BINGHAM, 3 of Pennsylvania SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SAMUEL A. OTIS, of Massachusetts DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE—JAMES MATHERS, of New York SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JONATHAN DAYTON, 4 of New Jersey CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN BECKLEY, 5 of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH WHEATON, of Rhode Island DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS CLAXTON CONNECTICUT GEORGIA Richard Potts 17 18 SENATORS SENATORS John Eager Howard Oliver Ellsworth 6 James Gunn REPRESENTATIVES James Hillhouse 7 James Jackson 14 8 Jonathan Trumbull George Walton 15 Gabriel Christie 9 Uriah Tracy Josiah Tattnall 16 Jeremiah Crabb 19 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE 20 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE William Craik Joshua Coit 21 Abraham Baldwin Gabriel Duvall Chauncey Goodrich Richard Sprigg, Jr. 22 Roger Griswold John Milledge George Dent James Hillhouse 10 James Davenport 11 KENTUCKY William Hindman Nathaniel Smith SENATORS Samuel Smith Zephaniah Swift John Brown Thomas Sprigg 12 Uriah Tracy Humphrey Marshall William Vans Murray Samuel Whittlesey Dana 13 REPRESENTATIVES DELAWARE Christopher Greenup MASSACHUSETTS SENATORS Alexander D. Orr John Vining SENATORS Henry Latimer MARYLAND Caleb Strong 23 REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE SENATORS Theodore Sedgwick 24 John Patten John Henry George Cabot 25 1 Elected December 7, 1795.
[Show full text]
Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment As a Madisonian Device
TURLEY TO PRINTER 11/30/99 3:15 PM Duke Law Journal VOLUME 49 OCTOBER 1999 NUMBER 1 SENATE TRIALS AND FACTIONAL DISPUTES: IMPEACHMENT AS A MADISONIAN DEVICE JONATHAN TURLEY† ABSTRACT In this Article, Professor Turley addresses the use of impeachment, specifically the Senate trial, as a method of resolving factional disputes about an impeached official’s legitimacy to remain in office. While the Madisonian democracy was designed to regulate factional pressures, academics and legislators often discuss impeachments as relatively static events focused solely on removal. Alternatively, impeachment is sometimes viewed as an extreme countermajoritarian measure used to “reverse” or “nullify” the popular election of a President. This Article advances a more dynamic view of the Senate trial as a Madisonian device to resolve factional disputes. This Article first discusses the history of impeachment and demon- strates that it is largely a history of factional or partisan disputes over legitimacy. The Article then explores how impeachment was used historically as a check on the authority of the Crown and tended to be used most heavily during periods of political instability. English and colonial impeachments proved to be highly destabilizing in the ab- sence of an integrated political system. The postcolonial impeachment process was modified to convert it from a tool of factional dissension to a vehicle of factional resolution. This use of Senate trials as a Madisonian device allows for the public consideration of the full rec- † J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. For Benjamin John Turley, who was born during the research and writing of this Article.
[Show full text]
Samuel Maclay, Colonial Surveyor
Samuel Maclay, Colonial Surveyor Samuel Maclay was born June 17, 1741 in Lurgan Township, Franklin County, and died October 5, 1811 at his home in Buffalo Township, Union County, Pennsylvania. Maclay was buried on the family farm, a brick wall enclosing the family graveyard. A monument honoring Samuel Maclay was dedicated in October 1906 when Maclay was reinterred at the Dreisbach Church Cemetery, across the road from his 18th century homesite. Several of Maclay's children still lie buried in the family graveyard. Samuel Maclay worked as a surveyor with his older brother William Maclay (a noted surveyor, lawyer and politician) in 1767-68. The Maclays surveyed the Buffalo Valley, and Samuel settled in Buffalo Township. His stone house is down a lane off Dreisbach Church Road. In July 1774, Samuel Maclay and John Lowden were chosen members of the Committee of Correspondence in Buffalo Township. The area had joined in selecting representatives from Northumberland County to the Convention of Deputies, which met in Philadelphia in January 1775. Maclay was lieutenant colonel of a battalion, and delegate with McLanachan, Geddes and Brady to the convention in Lancaster on July 4, 1776, which organized the militia for Pennsylvania. In 1790 Samuel Maclay was chosen to survey streams in northwestern Pennsylvania that might be used for transportation. The survey took months, and covered about one-third of Pennsylvania, to the borders of New York and Ohio. At the election in 1794, the Democratic Republicans defeated the Federalist incumbent in the legislature and elected Samuel Maclay to Congress, where he served from 1795 to 1796.
[Show full text]
Calculated for the Use of the State of Massachusetts-Bay
Mil Digitized by tine Internet Arcliive in 2009 witli funding from University of IVIassacliusetts, Boston Iittp://www.arcliive.org/details/pocketalmanackfo1807amer jB^''^^mfff^fiî!!uiutiXj»f^;'^' ^^ ^pî:^"P^^^ Bf^taSH THE J i MASSACHUSETTS i f AND United States Calendar; For the Year of our LORD 180 7, and the Thiity-firft oi American Indetendence, CONTAINING Civil, Ecdeâjlical, Judkial, and Military Lifts in MASSACHUSETTS ; AssaciATioNs, and Corporate Institutions, for littraiy, ag ncuUural, <ind cUariiablt Furpoitb, I Lijl of PoiT-TowNS in Majjachufdts^ with I'm 'I' Names of tkt Post-Masters. I ALSO, Catalogues of the Officers of the .1 GENERAL GOVERNMENT, With its feveral Deparanents and Eitablirhnicnts ; Time^ o^ the Siumgi. of the feveral Courts ; Goveinors in each State , PuDiic Duties, (&:c. USEFUL TABLES; And a Variety of oiher interefting Articles. 1> BOSTON : t Publilhcd by JOHN \\EsT, and MANNING & LORINO. Sold, wholcfale and retail, at their Book Stores, Cornhill. > fS^tpSfxârSgSiî^ci .^jÂd^xasw^^ô* , — : ECLIPSES FOR 1807. THER£ will be four Eclipfcs this year; two of the Sun anJ iwc of the Mooo. as follows : I. The firft will he of the Moon, May 21ft, lih.^SiiN in the mornuig ; and of courfe invifible. II. 7 he fecond will be of the Sun, June 6th, oh. 40m. in the morning ; which will llkewift; be invi^ble in rhp wellern conrnieHt, bnt vifible and central in the fouthein p^ri s of the Eh(1 Indirs. ' HI. The third will be a vifible eclipfe of the Moon, November 15th ; and by calculation as follows ^.
[Show full text]
MACLAY's MILL TWIN BRIDGE (EAST & WEST) HAER No. PA-457
MACLAY'S MILL TWIN BRIDGE (EAST & WEST) HAER No. PA-457 Pennsylvania Historic Bridges Recording Project Spanning Conodoguinet Creek at Maclay's Mill Rd. (State Rt. 4018) Mowersville vie. Q/J Wd\ &fe<Sc Franklin County Pennsylvania PHOTOGRAPHS XEROGRAPHIC COPIES OF COLOR TRANSPARENCIES REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS T\ WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATAS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD MACLAY'S MILL TWIN BRIDGE ("EAST & WEST) HAERNo. PA-457 Location: Spanning Conodoguinet Creek and mill race at Maclay's Mill Rd. (State Rt. 4018), Mowersville vicinity, Franklin County, Pennsylvania. USGS Quadrangle: Shippensburg, Pennsylvania (7.5-minute series). UTM Coordinates: 18/280860/4441480 (east bridge) 18/280840/4441460 (west bridge) Date of Construction: 1827. Builder: Silas Harry. Present Owner: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Present Use: Vehicular bridge. Significance: The Maclay's Mill Twin Bridges are outstanding examples of surviving stone arch bridges constructed by a nineteenth-century designer-craftsperson. Before the appearance of professional engineers and architects during the middle of the nineteenth century, local craftspeople such as Silas Harry were responsible for the design and construction of vernacular bridges such as the Maclay's Mill Twin Bridges. No fewer than six Franklin County stone arch bridges have been attributed to Harry. An active stonemason throughout much of the first half of the nineteenth century, Harry also was responsible for the 1842 reconstruction of the Franklin County courthouse. The Maclay's Mill Twin Bridges were listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1988. The bridges are also significant for their association with the Maclay family.
[Show full text]
Thomas Jefferson, Congress, and the Gunboat Debate, 1802
IN SEARCH OF A MORE REPUBLICAN NAVAL DEFENSE: THOMAS JEFFERSON, CONGRESS, AND THE GUNBOAT DEBATE, 1802-1810 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty and Department of History Liberty University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History By Ethan Zook December, 2019 1 Acknowledgements I was introduced to Thomas Jefferson in 2003, the two hundredth anniversary of the Lewis and Clark expedition. I was a member of a high school group which traced the route of the Corps of Discovery across the United States; we read Jefferson’s papers and considered themes like empire building and republicanism. That summer was my first encounter with his thought, and I was hooked. I’m grateful to Myron Blosser and Elwood Yoder, my high school teachers from Eastern Mennonite High School, who started my quest to better understand Jefferson. I’m also thankful for the assistance of scholars who graciously provided materials and suggestions. Craig L. Symonds, author of Navalists and Antinavalists, kindly (and completely unexpectedly) responded to my “out of the blue” email with encouragement and suggestions. Gene A. Smith assisted my search for a copy of his book For the Purposes of Defense. Christopher R. Sabick, Archaeological Director at the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum, provided a copy of Eric Emery’s archeological survey of the gunboat USS Allen. I’m especially grateful to my thesis advisors Troy L. Kickler and Carey M. Roberts who guided me through the research and writing process with extraordinary patience, and to David J. White who provided thoughtful suggestions for the later drafts.
[Show full text]
President Thomas Jefferson V. Chief Justice John Marshall by Amanda
A Thesis Entitled Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall By Amanda Dennison Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Master of Arts in History ________________________ Advisor: Diane Britton ________________________ Graduate School The University of Toledo August 2005 Copyright © 2005 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. Acknowledgments Finishing this step of my academic career would not have been possible without the support from my mentors, family, and friends. My professors at the University of Toledo have supported me over the past three years and I thank them for their inspiration. I especially thank Professors Alfred Cave, Diane Britton, Ronald Lora, and Charles Glaab for reading my work, making corrections, and serving as advisors on my thesis committee. I am eternally grateful to the University of Toledo History Department for their financial and moral support. When I came to the University of Toledo, I would not have survived my first graduate seminar, let alone long enough to finish this project without the experience from my undergraduate career at Southwestern Oklahoma State University. I thank Professors Laura Endicott and John Hayden for their constant support, reading drafts, and offering suggestions and Professors Roger Bromert and David Hertzel for encouraging me via email and on my visits back to Southwestern. Ya’ll are the best. I have a wonderful support system from my family and friends, especially my parents and brother. Thank you Mom and Dad for your encouragement and love.
[Show full text]
Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
[Show full text]
In Preparation for the 2012 Presidential Election, Members Of
Contested eleCtion laws: RepResentation, eleCtions, and paRty Building in pennsylvania, 1788–1794 David W. Houpt n preparation for the 2012 presidential election, members of the Pennsylvania GOP have been considering changing the way the Istate awards its electoral votes. Under the current system, the can- didate who wins the greatest number of votes statewide receives all twenty of the state’s votes in the Electoral College. In recent years, heavy Democratic voting in urban areas such as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh has offset Republican victories in rural parts of the state. In order to build on their strength in the less-populated areas, Republicans are considering having Pennsylvania award electors based on a district method. While this approach is technically con- stitutional, political commentators have been quick to condemn the proposal as unethical and potentially dangerous.1 This is not, however, the first time a political party has attempted to change election laws to their advantage. The manipulation of election law dates back to the first elections under the Constitution. pennsylvania history: a journal of mid-atlantic studies, vol. 79, no. 3, 2012. Copyright © 2012 The Pennsylvania Historical Association This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:12:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms pennsylvania history Concern over the lack of representation in the British Parliament was one of the major reasons the colonists decided to declare independence.2 The Revolution established the principle of actual representation—that all regions of a state or the nation ought to be represented in the legislature, and that federal representation ought to be apportioned by population in the House of Representatives—but there were still many questions about what that meant in practice.
[Show full text]
The Trials of John Fries
The Trials of John Fries N THE spring of 1800 Samuel Chase, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, presided with District I Judge Richard Peters at the Circuit Court for the Middle District in Pennsylvania. One of the cases before them which was destined to attract much public attention was that of the United States v. John Fries. The defendant, a Federalist, was fifty years old when he was brought to trial a second time for treason. Fries was a moderately successful auctioneer who had served as a captain in the Continental Army and in the Whiskey Rebellion. His arrest and first trial in 1799 resulted from his participation in the tragi- comic "Hot Water War" of that year. This ludicrous episode originated from a misunderstanding precipitated by poor com- munications. Anticipating war with France, Congress had enacted legislation designed to provide a means of financing it. Under the provisions of an Act of July 9, 1798, Congress authorized excise officers to assess the value of houses, lands, and slaves. On July 14th Congress also sanctioned a direct tax of $2,000,000 which was to be laid according to the preceding evaluation of property.1 In urban areas the acts were publicized, and the inhabitants were relatively in- different to the officers who proceeded unmolested with their work. In rural regions, however, such as northeastern Pennsylvania where many of the residents spoke and read only German, many people were unaware of the reason for the inquisitiveness of the men who were so assiduously assessing property and inexplicably counting windows of houses.
[Show full text]