An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere Looking for Freedom: An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere ‘Looking for Freedom: An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere’ A study submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Librarianship at THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD By Alexis Rigby September 2007 Alexis Rigby: 060111799 1 Looking for Freedom: An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere Acknowledgments For Max Mitchell Many Thanks to Andrew Cox and my dear friends and wonderful hosts S.A, D.Y and Y.M. Alexis Rigby: 060111799 2 Looking for Freedom: An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere Abstract This investigation of the Iranian blogosphere provides an account of the impact that Internet censorship has had on blog discourse. It focuses on a sample of English-language Iranian weblogs inside Iran and the Iranian diaspora to investigate how their experiences of blogging differs in terms of content, character and motivation differ. The methods used to generate the data include a literature review and research trip, an online survey and a textual analysis of blog content. In analysing the data the researcher grounds theory in relation to previous research conducted by Herring et al (2004) and Nardi, Schiano and Gumbrecht (2004). It is a qualitative inquiry that establishes why and how blog patterns have emerged and what motivates these bloggers to maintain weblogs. With the aim to explore processes of self-censorship it also considers how Iran’s long history of censoring activity and cultural paradoxes has influenced the spread of Internet access. Despite government attempts to control content through limiting connection speeds, blocking access to popular websites and arresting bloggers, Persian is the third most populous blogging language. Tough policies on freedom of expression and crackdowns on print media have all increased the importance of the Internet and consequently blogs as platforms for self-expression and self-empowerment. With this rise in active filtering Iranian bloggers have created new methods to counter limitations and undermine restrictions on social interactions. The main findings of this research suggest that blogs in the diaspora are much more similar to those inside Iran than anticipated as bloggers post about similar topics for similar audiences. Self-censorship is a process commonly found across the entire Iranian blogosphere as authors seek to avoid filtering and the loss of their audience inside Iran. The strategies of self-censorship highlighted by this research include: the omission of direct personal evaluation, retreats to personal experiences, disclaimers, conversational transcripts and anonymity or pseudonymity. Word Count: 307 Alexis Rigby: 060111799 3 Looking for Freedom: An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere Contents Page Contents ............................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Subject of Investigation............................................................................................ 6 1.2 Aims and Objectives ................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1 Research Questions............................................................................................. 9 1.3 Motivations .............................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Methodology and Methods Overview.................................................................... 10 1.5 Dissertation Structure............................................................................................. 11 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Methodological Strategies...................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Qualitative Characteristics................................................................................ 14 2.1.2 Rationale ........................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Methods of Data Collection ................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Literature Review and Research Trip ............................................................... 16 2.2.2 Survey ............................................................................................................... 18 2.2.3 Textual Analysis ............................................................................................... 19 2.2.3.1 Research Sample and Selection Criteria...................................................... 21 2.2.3.1.1 Insiders................................................................................................... 22 2.2.3.1.2 Outsiders ................................................................................................ 23 2.3 Method of Data Analysis ....................................................................................... 24 2.3.1 Grounded Theory.............................................................................................. 24 2.4 Ethical Approval and Research Practicalities ........................................................ 25 2.5 Timetable of Study Overview ................................................................................ 26 3. Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 27 3.1 A Culture of Paradoxes? ........................................................................................ 27 3.1.1 Pre-Islamic Histories and the Islamic Revolution ............................................ 27 3.1.2 A Veiled Society............................................................................................... 31 3.1.3 Education and National ‘Brain Drain’.............................................................. 33 3.1.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 35 3.2 The Internet Predicament ....................................................................................... 36 3.2.1 A Platform of Communication ......................................................................... 36 3.2.2 Access, Control and Regulation........................................................................ 38 3.2.3 Uncensoring the Censored................................................................................ 41 3.2.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 42 3.3 The Weblog Phenomenon...................................................................................... 43 3.3.1 Definition and Common Characteristics........................................................... 43 3.3.2 Style, Purpose and Genre.................................................................................. 44 3.3.3 The Quiet Revolution – Iranian Blogging ........................................................ 46 3.3.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 48 Alexis Rigby: 060111799 4 Looking for Freedom: An Exploration of the Iranian Blogosphere 4. Findings and Discussion ............................................................................................. 50 4.1 Quantitative Survey Results................................................................................... 50 4.2 Qualitative Survey Results..................................................................................... 52 4.3 Qualitative Textual Analysis Observations............................................................ 58 4.3.1 Object-oriented Motivations and Blog Characterisations................................. 58 4.3.1.1 Update Others on Activities and Whereabouts/Journals and Notebooks.... 59 4.3.1.2 Express Opinions to Influence Others/Filters and Notebooks .................... 60 4.3.1.3 Seek Others’ Opinions and Feedback/Journals ........................................... 61 4.3.1.4 ‘Think by Writing’/Filters, Journals and Notebooks................................... 62 4.3.1.5 Release Emotional Tension/Filters and Notebooks..................................... 63 4.4 Self-censoring Linguistic Strategies ...................................................................... 64 4.4.1 Reporting Experiences and Personal Evaluation.............................................. 64 4.4.2 Metaphor and Analogy ..................................................................................... 66 4.4.3 Anonymity and Pseudonymity.......................................................................... 67 4.5 Discussion Summary.............................................................................................. 69 5. Conclusion and Recommendations ........................................................................... 72 5.1 Recommendations for Further Research................................................................ 74 6. Bibliography ................................................................................................................ 75 7. Appendices...................................................................................................................84
Recommended publications
  • Open Letter to His Excellency, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran
    1 His Excellency Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran The Office of the Supreme Leader Tehran Province, Tehran, District 11, Islamic Republic of Iran 17 February 2021 Joint open letter to His Excellency, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran Your Excellency, We, the undersigned, write to you to express our grave concern over the arbitrary imprisonment of Dr Reza Eslami in Tehran’s Evin Prison. Dr Eslami’s case is illustrative of the ongoing clampdown against the legal and academic professions in Iran. On Monday 15 February 2021, 58 countries launched the International Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations1, characterizing such arbitrary detention as a standing violation of international law. The case against Dr Eslami is an emblematic assault on this rules-based international order. On 7 February 2021,2 Dr Reza Eslami, an Iranian-Canadian human rights and environmental law professor at Beheshti University,3 was sentenced to seven years imprisonment by Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court after being charged with ‘cooperating with a hostile state.’4 The case against Dr Eslami is devoid of any credible evidence and derives from spurious charges to begin with. We believe that this case is based on his participation in a training course on the rule of law in the Czech Republic in 2020, funded by a United States-based non-government organisation (NGO). Dr Eslami has refuted the charges as baseless, stating that his academic work was free of ‘political, security and foreign- relations issues’5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Zeinab Jalalian V. Iran Submission to WGAD, March 2015
    Zeinab Jalalian v. Iran Submission to WGAD, March 2015 Contents I. Identity of the Complainant ..................................................................................................................... 2 II. Introduction and Summary ..................................................................................................................... 3 III. Statement of Facts .................................................................................................................................. 6 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 6 10 March 2008: Arrest and detention of Ms. Jalalian in Iran .................................................................. 7 10 March 2008 – December 2008: Kermanshah Intelligence Prison and Kermanshah Juvenile Correction and Training Centre ............................................................................................................... 7 3 December 2008: Ms. Jalalian’s trial and conviction ............................................................................. 9 Lack of access to health care ................................................................................................................. 16 IV. VIOLATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Category I: No justification for the deprivation of liberty ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetics of Commitment in Modern Persian: a Case of Three Revolutionary Poets in Iran
    The Poetics of Commitment in Modern Persian: A Case of Three Revolutionary Poets in Iran by Samad Josef Alavi A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Shahwali Ahmadi, Chair Professor Muhammad Siddiq Professor Robert Kaufman Fall 2013 Abstract The Poetics of Commitment in Modern Persian: A Case of Three Revolutionary Poets in Iran by Samad Josef Alavi Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Shahwali Ahmadi, Chair Modern Persian literary histories generally characterize the decades leading up to the Iranian Revolution of 1979 as a single episode of accumulating political anxieties in Persian poetics, as in other areas of cultural production. According to the dominant literary-historical narrative, calls for “committed poetry” (she‘r-e mota‘ahhed) grew louder over the course of the radical 1970s, crescendoed with the monarch’s ouster, and then faded shortly thereafter as the consolidation of the Islamic Republic shattered any hopes among the once-influential Iranian Left for a secular, socio-economically equitable political order. Such a narrative has proven useful for locating general trends in poetic discourses of the last five decades, but it does not account for the complex and often divergent ways in which poets and critics have reconciled their political and aesthetic commitments. This dissertation begins with the historical assumption that in Iran a question of how poetry must serve society and vice versa did in fact acquire a heightened sense of urgency sometime during the ideologically-charged years surrounding the revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • De Farlige Bloggerne De Har Lagt Ned Aviser Og Arrestert Kritiske Journalister, Nå Prøver Myndighetene I Iran Å Kneble Bloggerne
    De farlige bloggerne De har lagt ned aviser og arrestert kritiske journalister, nå prøver myndighetene i Iran å kneble bloggerne. Men unge, smarte iranere finner hullene i den statlige nettsensuren. Av Bente Kalsnes, Master of Arts i Communication, Culture and Technology ved Georgetown University og community- ansvarlig på dagbladet.no Iran og Kina har en tvilsom felles interesse: interaktiviteten med andre mennesker er internettsensur. Kina har lenge vært kjent noe av forklaringen til bloggsuksessen som for å drive verdens strengeste internettsen- startet i usa gjennom selskap som blog- sur, blant annet ved å sensurere ord som ger.com. I dag finnes det 16,7 millioner “demokrati” og “menneskerettigheter” i blogger i verden, ifølge bloggsøkemotoren søkemotorer,1 men de siste årene har også Technorati,3 og disse favner om et vidt iranske myndigheter skjønt at internett er spekter av genre, alt fra personlige dagbøk- farlig for landets innbyggere. Først slo de er, politiske kommentarer og litterære ned på pornografiske sider som ikke søm- eksperimenter til foto-, video- og met seg for iranske statsborgere, men etter audioblogger. Blogger har fått gjennomslag hvert har myndighetene skjønt at politiske i amerikansk media etter avsløringer av fak- nettsider er minst like fordervende som tafeil hos blant annet programleder Dan pupper og lår. Det siste it-sjefene i Teheran Rather i 60 Minutes II. I et program om har fått snusen i, er blogger – nettjour- president George Bush’ militærtjeneste, naler som jevnlig oppdateres med kom- siterte Rather et dokument som hevdet at mentarer og linker av én eller flere person- Bush ikke fullførte militærtjenesten sin.4 er.
    [Show full text]
  • Disinformation Annotated Bibliography
    Disinformation Annotated Bibliography By Gabrielle Lim Copyright © The Citizen Lab Licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike licence). Electronic version first published in 2019 by the Citizen Lab. This work can be accessed through https://citizenlab.ca/2019/05/burned-after-reading-endless-mayflys- ephemeral-disinformation-campaign. Document Version: 1.0 The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license under which this report is licensed lets you freely copy, distribute, remix, transform, and build on it, as long as you: • give appropriate credit; • indicate whether you made changes; and • use and link to the same CC BY-SA 4.0 licence. However, any rights in excerpts reproduced in this report remain with their respective authors; and any rights in brand and product names and associated logos remain with their respective owners. Uses of these that are protected by copyright or trademark rights require the rightsholder’s prior written agreement. Suggested Citation Gabrielle Lim. "Disinformation Annotated Bibliography." Citizen Lab, University of Toronto, May 2019. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Ron Deibert, John Scott-Railton, and Adam Senft. The design of this document is by Mari Zhou. About the Citizen Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto The Citizen Lab is an interdisciplinary laboratory based at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto, focusing on research, development, and high-level strategic policy and legal engagement at the intersection of information and communication technologies, human rights, and global security. We use a “mixed methods” approach to research that combines methods from political science, law, computer science, and area studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Page 1 of 43
    2010 Human Rights Report: Iran Page 1 of 43 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » Human Rights Reports » 2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices » Near East and North Africa » Iran 2010 Human Rights Report: Iran* BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices April 8, 2011 The Islamic Republic of Iran, with a population of approximately 77 million, is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shia Muslim clergy, and political leaders vetted by the clergy, dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty--albeit restricted--and the rule of the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not directly elected but chosen by a directly elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei's writ dominates the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controls the armed forces and indirectly controls internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majles. The unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviews all legislation the Majles passes to ensure adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles; it also screens presidential and Majles candidates for eligibility. Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, a member of the Alliance of Builders political party, was reelected president in June 2009 in a multiparty election that was generally considered neither free nor fair. There were numerous instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently of civilian control.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Musicians and Dancers in Post-Revolution Iran
    Negotiating a Position: Women Musicians and Dancers in Post-Revolution Iran Parmis Mozafari Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Music January 2011 The candidate confIrms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. 2011 The University of Leeds Parmis Mozafari Acknowledgment I would like to express my gratitude to ORSAS scholarship committee and the University of Leeds Tetly and Lupton funding committee for offering the financial support that enabled me to do this research. I would also like to thank my supervisors Professor Kevin Dawe and Dr Sita Popat for their constructive suggestions and patience. Abstract This research examines the changes in conditions of music and dance after the 1979 revolution in Iran. My focus is the restrictions imposed on women instrumentalists, dancers and singers and the ways that have confronted them. I study the social, religious, and political factors that cause restrictive attitudes towards female performers. I pay particular attention to changes in some specific musical genres and the attitudes of the government officials towards them in pre and post-revolution Iran. I have tried to demonstrate the emotional and professional effects of post-revolution boundaries on female musicians and dancers. Chapter one of this thesis is a historical overview of the position of female performers in pre-modern and contemporary Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Blogging Iran – a Case Study of Iranian English Language Weblogs
    UNIVERSITY OF OSLO FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES TIK Centre for technology, innovation and culture P.O. BOX 1108 Blindern N-0317 OSLO Norway http://www.tik.uio.no ESST The European Inter-University Association on Society, Science and Technology http://www.esst.uio.no The ESST MA Blogging Iran – A Case Study of Iranian English Language Weblogs Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen University of Oslo Nature and Culture 2004 24.819 Words 1 Supervisor for this Master thesis has been Professor Terje Rasmussen from the Department of Media and Communication, the University of Oslo, Norway. I would also like to thank Elisabeth Staksrud from Statens Filmtilsyn for valuable information, and for pointing me to the Nordic Institute for Asian Studies (NIAS) in Copenhagen, Denmark, who were kind enough to offer me a scholarship and the opportunity to use their library. James Gomez was generous enough to send me his excellent new book Asian Cyberactivism for free. Last, but not least, I have to thank Mr. Hossein Derakhshan for spending some of his time giving me information and granting me an interview. Without him, and the other Iranian webloggers described here, this Master thesis would not have been possible. 2 Chapter outline of thesis: 1 Motivation 2. Methodology 3. The Internet and censorship 4. Background on Internet censorship in several countries 4.1 The case of China 4.2 The case of Singapore 4.3 Burma 5. The situation in Iran – Politics and censorship 6. Weblogs 6.1 About weblogs 6.2 Iranian weblogs 6.3 About description of weblogs 7. Weblogs – case studies 7.1 Weblogs by Insiders, Iranians in Iran 7.1.1 Additional weblogs by Insiders 7.2 Weblogs by Outsiders, Iranians in exile 7.3 Summary, and conclusion about weblog findings 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Anderson Cooper and Situation Room (CNN)
    US-Iran Media Resource Program National Iranian American Council 9 month report Program supported by: Connect US Fund, OSI, Colombe Foundation, Ploughshares Fund The US-Iran Media Resource Project is aimed at ensuring that the national media has the best information and interpretation available in a timely manner on the sensitive negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear program. The project has provided the news media with objective, balanced and well-documented analyses of important developments, highlighting potential openings for a peaceful settlement that might otherwise be unnoticed and deepening the understanding of the motives of involved actors. The fundamental goal of the program has been to prevent war between the US and Iran. The proposed solution towards preventing war has been to push for direct US-Iran negotiations through overwhelming public and media support for such a shift in policy. Evaluation: The project has made a significant impact on the debate in the US by producing unique analysis disseminated widely both to the media and directly to decision makers, briefing journalists in order to improve the accuracy of their reporting, advising TV and radio producers, and giving interviews to the media. The evaluation of the project during its first 9 months is based on both qualitative and quantitative measurements. Quantitatively, the project has produced an impressive number of deliverables, including seven (7) in depth Issue Briefs, twenty-two (22) Editorial Memos, and eight (8) statements. These written analyses have addressed a variety of issues, all pointing to the superiority of direct US-Iran negotiations versus military or economic warfare. These analyses, in turn, were either quoted or influenced otherwise reporting in major newspapers as well as important news shows, such as Meet the Press (where NIAC’s analysis was directly quoted by Tim Russel).
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Republic of Iran (Persian)
    Coor din ates: 3 2 °N 5 3 °E Iran Irān [ʔiːˈɾɒːn] ( listen)), also known اﯾﺮان :Iran (Persian [11] [12] Islamic Republic of Iran as Persia (/ˈpɜːrʒə/), officially the Islamic (Persian) ﺟﻣﮫوری اﺳﻼﻣﯽ اﯾران Jomhuri-ye ﺟﻤﮭﻮری اﺳﻼﻣﯽ اﯾﺮان :Republic of Iran (Persian Eslāmi-ye Irān ( listen)),[13] is a sovereign state in Jomhuri-ye Eslāmi-ye Irān Western Asia.[14][15] With over 81 million inhabitants,[7] Iran is the world's 18th-most-populous country.[16] Comprising a land area of 1,648,195 km2 (636,37 2 sq mi), it is the second-largest country in the Middle East and the 17 th-largest in the world. Iran is Flag Emblem bordered to the northwest by Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan,[a] to the north by the Caspian Sea, to the Motto: اﺳﺗﻘﻼل، آزادی، ﺟﻣﮫوری اﺳﻼﻣﯽ northeast by Turkmenistan, to the east by Afghanistan Esteqlāl, Āzādi, Jomhuri-ye Eslāmi and Pakistan, to the south by the Persian Gulf and the Gulf ("Independence, freedom, the Islamic of Oman, and to the west by Turkey and Iraq. The Republic") [1] country's central location in Eurasia and Western Asia, (de facto) and its proximity to the Strait of Hormuz, give it Anthem: ﺳرود ﻣﻠﯽ ﺟﻣﮫوری اﺳﻼﻣﯽ اﯾران geostrategic importance.[17] Tehran is the country's capital and largest city, as well as its leading economic Sorud-e Melli-ye Jomhuri-ye Eslāmi-ye Irān ("National Anthem of the Islamic Republic of Iran") and cultural center. 0:00 MENU Iran is home to one of the world's oldest civilizations,[18][19] beginning with the formation of the Elamite kingdoms in the fourth millennium BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy
    E-PAPER A Companion to Democracy #3 Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy LEJLA TURCILO AND MLADEN OBRENOVIC A Publication of Heinrich Böll Foundation, August 2020 Preface to the e-paper series “A Companion to Democracy” Democracy is multifaceted, adaptable – and must constantly meet new challenges. Democratic systems are influenced by the historical and social context, by a country’s geopolitical circumstances, by the political climate and by the interaction between institutions and actors. But democracy cannot be taken for granted. It has to be fought for, revitalised and renewed. There are a number of trends and challenges that affect democracy and democratisation. Some, like autocratisation, corruption, the delegitimisation of democratic institutions, the shrinking space for civil society or the dissemination of misleading and erroneous information, such as fake news, can shake democracy to its core. Others like human rights, active civil society engagement and accountability strengthen its foundations and develop alongside it. The e-paper series “A Companion to Democracy” examines pressing trends and challenges facing the world and analyses how they impact democracy and democratisation. Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy 2/ 38 Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy 3 Lejla Turcilo and Mladen Obrenovic Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical origins of misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation 5 3. Information disorder – key concepts and definitions 7 3.1. Fake news – definitions, motives, forms 7 3.2. Disinformation, misinformation, malinformation 8 4. Distortion of truth and manipulation of consent 12 5. Democracy at risk in post-truth society – how misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation destroy democratic values 17 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Weblogistan: a New Path to Self-Expression in Iran
    Occasional paper MÄRZ 2008 KONRAD- ADENAUER- STIFTUNG WASHINGTON, D.C. Weblogistan: a new path to self-expression in Iran by Sepideh Parsa While official US- My weblog is an opportunity for me to be heard...a free microphone that doesn’t need speakers…a Iranian relations con- blank page…Sometimes I stretch out on this page in the nude…now and again I hide behind it. tinue to be at a low Occasionally I dance on it…Once in a while I tear it up…and from time to time I draw a picture of point, American pop my childhood on it…I think…I live…I weblog …therefore I…exist.[1] culture remains surpri- In recent years the blogosphere in the Middle East has experienced significant growth. singly popular with the Weblogs have become a primary medium for dissidence against the autocratic regime Iranian population itself. with its state-controlled media. Iran is one of the countries with the strictest censorship The Konrad Adenauer policy in the Middle East. Thus, weblogs offer Iranians the only platform to peacefully exchange their policy thoughts, emotions and opinions by overcoming the boundaries of Foundation has therefore gender and social class that have been imposed by the government. Hence, the Iranian asked researcher Sepideh people can enjoy such democratic pillars as freedom of speech and self-determination al- Parsa to provide a sketch beit to a limited extent. of the vibrant Iranian blogosphere. While Having surveyed approximately one hundred weblogs the author has chosen to center her “Weblogistan” is par- research on the three most discussed topics by concentrating on 20 weblogs.
    [Show full text]