Guanabara Bay Report Card The quality of Guanabara Bay directly affects over 8.5 million people that live in the surrounding area. This report card shows the current environmental health conditions and supports the need for restoration and conservation of the Bay. Sanitation & trash are key problems How was health calculated? Environmental report cards are used by resource managers Guanabara Bay health and Guanabara Basin health to assess and report on the ecosystem health of a region. are defined as the progress of five indicators toward Developing rigorous, quantitative assessments provides scientifically-derived thresholds or goals. The Bay indicators accountability to support environmental protection efforts. are dissolved inorganic nitrogen, total phosphorus, A five-step process of developing report cards is used to dissolved oxygen, biological oxygen demand, and fecal assess progress: 1) determine values and threats, 2) choose coliform. The Basin indicators are dissolved inorganic indicators, 3) define thresholds, 4) calculate scores, and 5) nitrogen, orthophosphate, dissolved oxygen, biological communicate results. oxygen demand, and turbidity. The indicators are combined into two water quality scores, one score for the Bay, and This report card provides a transparent, timely, and one for the Basin, ranging from A to F. geographically detailed assessment of health in Guanabara’s Bay and Basin using data from 2013-2015. The data was For more information on methodology and scoring please collected by INEA's monitoring program. visit guanabarabay.ecoreportcard.org. Access to sewage treatment and trash collection greatly needed throughout Guanabara Bay Population Sewage treated A lack of sewage collection and treatment surrounding Municipality (thousands) (%) Guanabara Bay has led to a number of problems for both people and the environment. Untreated sewage entering the Belford Roxo 469 34% Bay contributes to high levels of bacteria in the water. This Cachoeira de Macacu 54 0% makes the water unsuitable for recreation and fishing. Duque de Caxias 855 5% The city with the highest amount of sewage treatment in the Guapimirim 51 no data Basin is Niterói, with 95% of its sewage treated by a private Itaboraí 218 2% company. The next highest amount of sewage treatment was in Rio de Janeiro, with 47% of sewage treated. The total Magé 227 0% amount of sewage treatment for all municipalities combined Mesquita 168 7% was only 35% in 2014. This data was collected by the National Nilópólis 157 0% Sanitation Information System (SNIS). Niterói 420 95% Trash collection and disposal is a long-standing problem in Nova Iguaçu 608 0.05% Guanabara Bay. Without trash services available, tons of trash Rio Bonito 43 no data end up in the Bay, negatively impacting human health, recreation, tourism, fisheries, and the environment. Rio de Janeiro 4005 47% Ecobarriers have been São Gonçalo 1000 10% collecting floating trash Trash collected by ecobarriers in 2016 São João de Meriti 459 0% over the last two years in 800 the tributaries of 700 Tanguá 31 0% Guanabara Bay. By 600 TOTAL 8765 35% 500 August 2016, a total of 400 Population data within the Basin from Brazilian Institute for 17 ecobarriers were 300 Tons of trash Geography and Statistics for 2010. Sewage treatment data implemented. While they 200 help keep trash out of 100 from 2014, released by the National Sanitation Information 0 System (SNIS). the Bay, it is still July May June April important to dispose of March August January October February December November trash properly so it does Month September not reach the rivers. Trash collected by ecobarriers. Source: INEA, 2017. Guanabara Bay health Water quality was good to poor in the Bay The overall score for Guanabara Bay water quality was a D. The highest scoring indicator in the Bay was Guapimirim dissolved inorganic nitrogen, with a B. Magé The lowest scoring indicator in the Bay D was total phosphorus, with an F. When Duque de Caxias in excess, these nutrients contribute to algal blooms. Dissolved oxygen scored a 4 B and biological oxygen demand scored a D. In conjunction, these indicators show the availability of oxygen, which is essential to aquatic life. Fecal coliform scored an F, which indicates 5 the presence of untreated sewage in 1 the water. For this report card, the Bay was divided into five regions, based on Governador Island the flow and water circulation patterns. São Gonçalo 1. Central channel This was the second highest scoring region, which had an overall score of C. The region has high oceanic flushing in 3 the deep central channel of Guanabara Bay, and it extends from the oceanic entrance of the Bay to Paquetá Island. 2. Mouth of Guanabara Bay This was the highest scoring region, 2 which had an overall score of B. This Niterói area includes nearshore regions at the Rio de Janeiro mouth of the Bay on both the west side (Rio de Janeiro) and east side (Niterói). 3. Central margins of Guanabara Bay Atlantic Ocean This region had an overall score of C. This area includes the harbors of Rio de Janeiro and Niterói with dredged The scores for the regions of the Bay and scores for the sampling stations. The Bay channels and is impacted by the was divided into regions based on Mayr et al. 1989. Sampling stations are from INEA. presence of vessels. 4. Northern Guanabara Bay A B C D F This was the second lowest scoring 85–100%: 70–85%: 55–70%: 40–55%: 0–40%: region, with an overall score of D. This Water quality in Water quality in Water quality in Water quality in Water quality in region includes shallow water habitats these areas is these areas is these areas is these areas is these areas is and mangrove forests from the Iguaçu very good. good. moderate. poor. very poor. River mouth to Itaoca. The grades were obtained from the percentage 5. Northwest Guanabara Bay of the samples that met the threshold. This was the lowest scoring region, which had an overall score of F. This region is west of the Iguaçu River mouth and includes channels separating Governador and Fundao Islands. Guanabara Bay: beautiful but polluted The values of Guanabara Bay are under threat Guanabara Bay is a beautiful natural harbor that forms the identity of the Rio de Janeiro region. The Bay supports the Brazilian economy, through activities like shipping, recreation, and tourism. Urban development results in significant impacts including trash and untreated sewage that pollute the Bay and contaminate its waters. In addition, industrial and agricultural development can result in contaminated runoff. D Nova Iguaçu Duque de Magé Guapimirim Caxias Belford Roxo Itaboraí São João de Meriti Nilópolis Legend São Gonçalo Wastewater treatment plant Landfill Rio de Ponte Ri Janeiro o-Niterói Ecobarrier Niterói Refinery Shipyard Port Ferry station Airport Fishing area Soccer stadium The values, threats, and services in Guanabara Bay. Brazil Fight Historic Aquatic symbol mistreated Permanent important Resource Chaotic Treatable misused Recuperable responsibilities Pollutants Valuable Estuary Renewable Backyard ImportantDeteriorated Entrance problem water Recoverable Dirty Workshop stakeholders recognize Hearth Navigable Green Filter NeglectedIncredible Postcard Useful habitat Productive State Renegade polluted Self-sustainable dirty Dependent Waste sanctuary Resistant Risky Transportation the need for action well Spetacular debris Representative biodiversity Clean Huge Sustainable wastes Vulnerable Essential Housing PollutedFluminense Fundamental reference Heritage sky Finite fetid Disrespectedtrash Diverse possibility Well-used help mangroves Tourism Lifemirror Comprehensive History population care Nursery Extensive home treasure Rich During the development of the report card, participants at workshops Integration species uses Fantastic Blue dump Poor rich Special Potent rivers Ecosystem sewage gave feedback about Guanabara Bay values, threats, and restoration port Involving Economy infinite people efforts. Each person was asked to use four words to describe the Bay. Nature Water recovered future Monument house Conflicting Sensible Estuarine Disorganized Mother benchmark Brown marine threats Marvelous Resilient food-source Habitat BeautifulImpacted Fragile Rio Open The results were compiled into a word cloud where the dominant words Abandoned preserved Ecological extensive Unknown jewel Unequal Excellent were beautiful, polluted, dynamic, unique, dirty, important, and alive. Connection DynamicMultiuse Future Hydrodynamic Limited subsistence ecosystem Everything Necessary Active Contaminated Rare Alive Health solution The participants concluded that while the conditions in Guanabara mismanaged Support Bay are challenging, they are committed to enhancing, restoring, and UniquePublic protecting the Bay for future generations. This word cloud describes how participants feel about the state of Guanabara Bay. Guanabara Basin health Very poor water quality in the Basin All the area that drains to Guanabara Bay makes up the Basin. The Guapimirim-Macacu region had the best score, while the Rio de Janeiro region had the worst score. The overall score for Guanabara Basin water quality was a D. The highest scoring indicator in the Basin was orthophosphate, with a D. The lowest scoring indicator D in the Basin was dissolved oxygen, with an F. Both biological oxygen demand and dissolved inorganic nitrogen scored D. Turbidity was the second highest scoring indicator with a D. 3 2 Guanabara Bay 4 5 1 6 A 85–100% D 40–55% B 70–85% F 0–40% C 55–70% No data Atlantic Ocean The scores for the regions of the Basin and scores for the sampling stations. Sampling stations are from INEA. 1. Rio de Janeiro region. This was the lowest scoring region, 4. Caceribu region. This was the second highest scoring with an overall score of F. This is the most urbanized basin, region, with an overall score of D. This basin supports which extends from the mouth of Guanabara Bay to the petrochemical industrial development, urban development, Pavuna River and includes Governador Island. and agriculture. 2. Baixada Fluminense region. This region had an overall 5. Alcantara region. This was the second lowest score of F.